CASE: GONZALES V.

COURT OF APPEALS
G.R. No. L-37453
May 25, 1979

FACTS:
Petitioner Rizalina Gonzales and Lutgarda Santiago (Private respondent) are the nieces
of the deceased Isabel Gabriel who died a widow. A will was thereafter submitted to probate. The
said will was typewritten, in Tagalog and appeared to have been executed in April 1961 or two
months prior to the death of Isabel. It consisted of 5 pages including the attestation and
acknowledgment, with the signature of testatrix on page 4 and the left margin of all the pages.

Lutgarda was named as the universal heir and executor. The petitioner opposed the
probate.

The lower court denied the probate on the ground that the will was not executed and
attested in accordance with law on the issue of the competency and credibility of the witnesses.

ISSUE:
Whether or not the credibility of the subscribing witnesses is material to the validity of a
will.

HELD:
No. The law requires only that witnesses possess the qualifications under Art. 820 (NCC)
and none of the disqualifications of Art. 802. There is no requirement that they are of good
standing or reputation in the community, for trustworthiness, honesty and uprightness in order
that his testimony is believed and accepted in court. For the testimony to be credible, it is not
mandatory that evidence be established on record that the witnesses have good standing in the
the community. Competency is distinguished from credibility; the former being determined by Art.
820 while the latter does not require evidence of such good standing. Credibility depends on the
convincing weight of his testimony in court.