Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mitpress.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Leonardo.
http://www.jstor.org
The Measurement of Music and the
Cerebral Clock: A New Theory
Ernst Poppel
ABSTRACT
? 1989 ISAST
PergamonPressplc.PrintedinGreatBritain.
0024-094X/89
$3.00+0.00 LEONARDO, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 83-89, 1989 83
order under identical experimental
NeuronalOscillator ("Brain-Clock") conditions. Apparently, the new ques-
I I I I I I tion activated a different cerebral
_I - t
mechanism.
This thesis, i.e. that the recognition
Tempo-L Player A i J J J j of temporal order requires a further
Control J cerebral mechanism than is necessary
J J J J for the recognition of asynchrony, has
PlayerB I
been verified by experiments on pa-
Synchronization Ifthe phase angle differencebetween tients who have suffered central brain
"inphase" changes is too great the results may be: damage. In these experiments the
threshold for the recognition of tem-
a) aesthetic displeasure
poral order is raised to approximately
b) experience of 2 tempi 100 ms. In contrast to the auditory fu-
sion threshold, which is roughly the
Fig. 3. Neuronal oscillator of a conductor (t-arrowat the top; vertical bars indicating
'ticks' of the 'brain-clock') controlling the tempo of two players. Player A is thought to be same among healthy and brain-dam-
synchronized; player B lags behind. aged subjects, an obvious difference in
thresholds can be observed in the
TIME QUANTA- poral fusion of a succession of stimuli recognition of the temporal order of
in the visual or tactile realms have events.
EVIDENCEFOR A shown that the fusion threshold is ap- A surprising result is that among
'BRAIN-CLOCK' proximately 10 ms in the tactile system healthy subjects the threshold for the
and about 20 ms to 30 ms in the visual recognition of temporal order in the
First, let me demonstrate some find- system. These thresholds are depend- three sensory systems appears to be
ings on subjective simultaneity and ent on the specific stimuli selected. If the same for any one individual,
asynchrony. If, over earphones, a test the sensory systems hearing, touch whereas the thresholds for the recog-
subject is given a brief stimulus lasting, and vision are compared, it is striking nition of asynchrony differ. This ob-
for example, 1 ms (0.001 second) in that the transition from simultaneity servation suggests that the recognition
each ear, then when both stimuli are to asynchrony differs among them, of temporal order necessitates only
produced simultaneously, only one whereby the auditory system has by far one cerebral mechanism, which is sim-
tone is perceived-in the middle of the lowest fusion threshold. The ilarly available to the three sensory sys-
the head. If a delay of, say, 1 ms occurs differences in fusion thresholds of the tems investigated, whereas other, pre-
between the two stimuli, still only one various sensory systems are probably sumably peripheral, mechanisms are
tone is perceived, although, objec- based on their mechanisms of trans- responsible for the recognition of
tively speaking, the two stimuli are not duction. Transduction refers to the asynchrony.
simultaneous. Objective asynchrony is transformation of physical events (e.g. If events are to be placed in a tem-
not sufficient for subjective asyn-
light or sound) into action potentials poral order, indicating which came
chrony. The tone, however, is no in the brain. Transduction is known to first, etc., it is essential for the indi-
longer perceived in the middle of the take considerably longer within the vidual events to be identified. A ques-
subject's head but either on one side visual system than within the auditory tion concerning the mechanisms re-
or on the other. Only if the temporal
system, which apparently results in a sponsible for the recognition of
difference between the two acoustic far less well differentiated perception temporal order involves determining
stimuli is 3 ms (4 ms to 5 ms in some of simultaneity in the visual realm than the minimal time required to identify
test subjects) is the threshold of the in the auditory realm. events and to make this information
perception of asynchrony reached, During experiments involving the consciously available. Experiments to
and the subject hears a separate sound fusion threshold in the different sen- determine the minimal times that are
in each ear.
sory systems, my colleagues J. Ilm- required to make a conscious identifi-
If the same experiment is per-
berger, N. V. Steinbuichel and I in- cation have shown that 30 ms to 50 ms
formed on patients with brain dam- seem necessary.
quired whether one or two stimuli had
age, e.g. after a stroke in the left cere- been perceived. When only a minimal This hypothesis has been substan-
bral hemisphere with a resulting alteration of the experimental condi- tiated by investigations measuring re-
speech disturbance, the measured tions was made, it became obvious that action times involved in making a
transition from synchrony to asyn-
simply changing the question could choice [8]. Above all, studies of the
chrony-the auditory fusion thresh- lead to a different test result. In the intrahemispheric reaction times in
old-is also between 3 ms and 5 ms. next experiment, we no longer asked choice making, i.e. when stimuli were
They have the same auditory fusion if one or two stimuli had been per- presented to only one hemisphere of
threshold as healthy subjects. The cen- ceived; rather, the subject had to indi- the brain, illustrated that minimal
tral brain damage demonstrates no in- cate which stimulus came first and times of between 30 ms and 50 ms were
fluence on the transition from syn- which second. The question was di- required to decide between stimuli. It
chrony to asynchrony. One therefore rected at the order in which the per- is theoretically possible that each
surmises that the ability to perceive ceived stimuli occurred. Although the stimulus activates an oscillating pro-
temporal differences among stimuli transition from simultaneity to asyn- cess in the brain, whereby, technically
depends upon peripheral mecha- chrony took 3 ms to 5 ms in the audi- speaking, this process is to be under-
nisms of the nervous system.
tory system, 30 ms to 50 ms were neces- stood as a relaxation oscillator. Such
Experiments to determine tem- sary for the recognition of temporal neuronal oscillators are immediately
P6ppel,The Measurement
w of Music and the Cerebral Clock 85
~~~~~~85
porarily blocked, all temporal func- in the brain that has an integrative integrating mechanism, which is 3 sec-
tions of musical expression remain function. This integrating mechanism onds on the average.
intact, e.g. the patient still sings rhyth- can be demonstrated for the phenom- One must ask whether there exists
mically and can control the tempo enon that I refer to as the subjective further evidence that the subjective
precisely. The patient, however, is no present, or 'now'. present or immediate consciousness
longer able to modulate pitch. The A simple experiment illustrates the can last only a few seconds. Many ex-
song is sung on only one note. This integration of single events into uni- periments on speech behavior have
leads one to believe that the right fied concepts. If a metronome ticks been conducted to investigate this.
hemisphere holds the key to pitch every second, it is easy for everyone to One can demonstrate, for example,
modulation. This conviction is sup- pick up a subjective beat. Everysecond that verbal units in spontaneous
ported by numerous experiments on beat can be given a subjective accent, speech are limited to about 3 seconds.
patients with delimited right hemi- although all beats are identically loud. Tests concerning the recognition of
spheric lesions, whose ability to modu- It probably also would be possible to rhythm can also be cited [13], al-
late pitch has disappeared and whose unite three successive beats into a sub- though they determined a somewhat
capacity to differentiate among vari- jective Gestalt by attributing emphasis shorter temporal limit. A further area
ous pitches is limited. to every third beat, although this may that is especially illustrative of the ex-
This evidence presumably corre- be difficult for some. Trying to com- istence of a finite limit to conscious-
lates with right hemispheric domi- bine four, or even five, consecutive ness involves particular phenomena in
nance in certain aspects of our emo- beats subjectively into a recognizable the arts.
tions. It is thus plausible that it is the form will prove even more difficult for The 3-second phenomenon can be
modulation in pitch that lends music many. This test demonstrates that the verified in poetry as well as in music.
its particular emotional effect. A. Holl- integration of successive events into Experiments that Fred Turner and I
mann and I conducted a test to inves- perceptual forms has a temporal limit, conducted in 1983 using poems in
tigate the extent to which patients with which seems to be a few seconds. Nu- different languages demonstrated
right hemispheric lesions can recog- merous experiments, especially con- that verse lines preferably take only 3
nize the emotional content of a piece cerning the temporal organization of seconds when spoken aloud [14]. Re-
of music. We used songs that were vision, illustrate that the limit above gardless of the language involved, we
from an African culture but whose which we are no longer able to create discovered that there appears to be a
emotional meaning would be recog- cognitive entities by integrating events universal temporal phenomenon,
nizable to any healthy member of our is about 3 seconds [12]. These tem- which poets, presumably in all lan-
culture. The patients we tested, how- poral limits of integration can vary guages, have observed. Assuming that
ever, were severely handicapped in individually, i.e. slightly longer or Latin and ancient Greek were spoken
evaluating these songs. In particular, shorter intervals are also possible. in a tempo similar to languages of to-
they were no longer able to recognize I would like to suggest applying the day, verse lines in antiquity observed
sorrow expressed in a song. This ob- phenomenon of temporal integration the 3-second segmentation of speech.
servation verifies the importance of to the formal definition of the subjec- Considering the wide variety of
the right hemisphere for the recogni- tive present, or 'now'. That which is grammatical possibilities and cultural
tion of a musically expressed emotion. subjectivelyavailable to us is so for only traditions, there is no recognizable
a few seconds. The mental availability reason for such an ubiquitous 3-
of something of which we are only tem- second segmentation. It would have
THE 3-SECOND porarily conscious is determined by been easy to compose longer poetic
WINDOW OF the temporal limitation of a central lines. The apparent reason is that the
3-second segmentation of the con-
TEMPORAL
INTEGRATION Fig. 5. Visuali7ation of two brain mechanisms underlying tempo control and temporal
integration during musical performance. A neuronal oscillator provides 'ticks' of a 'brain-
Returning to the hierarchical classifi- clock' (t-arrowat the top). It is suggested that this 'brain-clock' underlies tempo control
cation of the subjective experience of and also provides the temporal framework for event detection. In addition, a neuronal
mechanism is assumed that integrates successive events into units. Experimental evidence
time, how far has this taxonomic sys-
tem progressed? Examination of syn- suggests that sensory stimuli lasting longer than the integration interval do not lead to the
subjective impression of a musical movement and thus of tempo. Only if several events
chrony, asynchrony and succession are recorded within one integration interval-using the 'brain-clock' as a device to do so-
raises the question of whether these will musical movement and thus tempo be perceptually available.
three aspects alone are sufficient to
grasp the meaning of experienced NeuronalOscillator ("Brain-Clock")
time.
i I 1 IIII1 1111I I1 1IIi 111.III. t
A brief reflection reveals that an ad-
L-I-. 1 I
^J , II II I1 1
ditional mechanism must be necessary
to perceive time. Everyone knows I IntegrationIntervals
from personal experience that events
are not experienced in isolation, but
^. ~ @ # perception
rather that single occurrences are re-
Tempo- HHHHHHH HtHHHH HH of tempo
lated to one another and, normally,
create perceptive forms (Gestalten) in * Control t I No perception
which several events are combined.
durationof acoustic stimuli of tempo
This is made possible by a mechanism