Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol xxx (2016) 1e6

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Mealtime behavior among parents and their young children with food
allergy
Linda Jones Herbert, PhD *, y; Priya Mehta, BA y; Hemant Sharma, MD, MHS *, y
* Division of Allergy and Immunology, Childrens National Health System, Washington, DC
y
The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Article history: Background: Food allergies are increasingly prevalent in the pediatric population. Balancing allergen
Received for publication August 4, 2016. avoidance with the promotion of healthy eating behaviors can be challenging for families.
Received in revised form November 8, 2016. Objective: To characterize mealtime behaviors among parents of young children with food allergy.
Accepted for publication December 1, 2016. Methods: Seventy-four parents of young children with food allergies (!7 years of age) completed measures
of mealtime behavior, perceptions of food allergy risk and severity, pediatric parenting stress, and food
allergyerelated quality of life. Mealtime behavior reports were compared with published data regarding
typically developing children, young children with type 1 diabetes, and children with diagnosed feeding
disorders (with or without related medical factors).
Results: Parents of young children with food allergies reported frequent mealtime concerns. Specically,
they reported signicantly more mealtime behavioral concerns than typically developing peers, comparable
mealtime behavioral concerns to young children with type 1 diabetes, and signicantly fewer mealtime
behavioral concerns than children with diagnosed feeding disorders. Parental mealtime concerns were
positively correlated with other parent perceptions of food allergy, such as risk of allergen exposure, illness-
related parenting stress, and food allergyerelated quality of life.
Conclusion: Young children with food allergy and their parents are more likely to exhibit mealtime
behavioral concerns than typically developing peers and their parents. Future research should investigate
the effect of food allergies and maladaptive mealtime behaviors on childrens nutrition to provide clinical
guidelines for parents who may benet from psychosocial and/or nutritional support.
! 2016 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Introduction skills, and autonomy.10e12 Finding a balance between safe food al-
lergy management and engagement in normal developmental
Food allergies are increasingly prevalent in the pediatric popu-
tasks may be challenging.
lation, affecting an estimated 8% of children in the United States.1,2
A primary developmental task during early childhood is the
Food allergy diagnosis can be life-altering for the child and family; a
establishment of healthy eating habits. Mealtime behavioral con-
key component of treatment is allergen avoidance to prevent
cerns are very common in healthy, typically developing children.
potentially life-threatening allergic reactions.3e5 In early childhood,
Approximately 25% to 45% of parents of typically developing chil-
parents are often responsible for all aspects of food allergy man-
dren report concerns with their childs feeding and mealtime be-
agement because children may be too young to understand the
haviors, including disruptive child behaviors (eg, food refusal, food
complexities of allergen avoidance and lack the skills necessary to
selectivity, getting up from the table).13e16 Many parents report
implement food allergy management.6 Thus, food allergy man-
anxiety about their childs mealtime behaviors and use maladaptive
agement can be tedious, time-consuming, and stressful for paren-
techniques to encourage their child to eat.17 These behaviors may
ts.6e9 Further complicating food allergy management is that
have unintended consequences, such as more or less food intake or
parents are responsible for supporting their childs normal devel-
lack of a varied diet, which may then contribute to inadequate or
opmental needs, such as promoting healthy eating habits, social
excess weight gain and/or inappropriate nutritional intake.17
Furthermore, behavioral problems at mealtime may increase
Reprints: Linda Jones Herbert, PhD, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Childrens
parental stress and decrease quality of life.
National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010; E-mail:
lherbert@childrensnational.org. For families of children with chronic illnesses who require strict
Disclosures: Authors have nothing to disclose. diet management, such as type 1 diabetes, mealtime behavioral

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2016.12.002
1081-1206/! 2016 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2 L.J. Herbert et al. / Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol xxx (2016) 1e6

concerns are even more common than among families of typically (to be consistent with the feeding measure guidelines), diagnosis of
developing children.18,19 These concerns may have consequences at least one IgE-mediated food allergy by an allergist, access to the
for illness-specic physiologic and psychosocial outcomes.20 For internet, and English uency. No parents elected to opt out of
example, more frequent problematic child and parent mealtime including their responses in the deidentied research database.
behavior was signicantly associated with poorer diabetes-related
quality of life in a sample of parents of young children with type Measures
1 diabetes.21 Given the need to focus on eating and food con-
Demographic questionnaire
sumption similar to children with type 1 diabetes, children with
As part of the online survey, participants rst completed a de-
food allergy may also be at greater risk for mealtime behavioral
mographic and medical questionnaire developed by the study team
concerns than typically developing children. However, little is
that assessed child age, sex, race, and ethnicity and parent age, sex,
known about mealtime behavioral concerns among children with
and education level. Parents also reported diagnosis of peanut, tree
food allergy. Preliminary research indicates that food allergy pa-
nut, cows milk, egg, soy, wheat, sh, and/or shellsh allergy.
tients may be overrepresented at feeding clinics compared with the
general population,22 and feeding concerns are common among
Child mealtime behavior
children diagnosed with cows milk allergy, food proteineinduced
Parents completed the Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assess-
gastrointestinal allergies, and eosinophilic gastrointestinal dis-
ment Scale (BPFAS)15 to obtain parent report of childrens meal-
orders.23e25 However, no prior studies have examined mealtime
time behavior and parents strategies for managing these
concerns among children with a broader array of food allergies; behaviors. The BPFAS was developed for parents of children aged 9
therefore, it is unknown whether those concerns are increased
months to 7 years. The measure includes 35 items regarding child
compared with typically developing children or associated with behaviors (25 items) and parents behaviors and emotions (10
increased parenting stress and/or poorer quality of life.
items) associated with meals. For each behavior, parents report the
The aim of this study is to characterize mealtime concerns frequency on a 5-point Likert scale and indicate a dichotomous
among parents of young children with food allergy. To accomplish
endorsement (yes/no) of whether the behavior is a problem for
this aim, we (1) describe mealtime behavioral concerns among a the parent. Six scores are derived from the BPFAS: child behavior
sample of parents of young children with food allergy, (2) compare
frequency, child problem, parent behavior frequency, parent
the mealtime concerns of parents in our sample with published problem, total behavior frequency, and total problem. Higher
data from 3 other samples (children with type 1 diabetes, children
scores indicate more concerns. The BPFAS has acceptable validity
with diagnosed feeding disorders, and typically developing chil- and reliability among typically developing populations.15 It has
dren), and (3) investigate the association of parents mealtime
also been successfully used in pediatric chronic illness pop-
concerns with parenting stress and food allergyerelated quality ulations, such as those with type 1 diabetes, with satisfactory in-
of life.
ternal consistency.21,27 The Cronbach a values for this sample were
0.91 for the total behavior frequency scale and 0.93 for the total
Methods problem scale.
Procedure
Food allergy perceptions
This study was approved by the Childrens National Health Parents perceptions regarding their childs risk of allergen
Systems institutional review board. Participants were recruited exposure, food allergy severity, and food allergy worry were
during a 16-month period (March 2014 to June 2015). Primary assessed. Perceived risk of allergen exposure was rated on a 4-point
caregivers of children 0 to 18 years old with at least one diagnosed Likert scale (0 indicating no chance to 3 indicating high risk),
food allergy (hereafter referred to as parents) completed an online perceived food allergy severity was rated on a 100-point visual
clinical assessment of food allergyerelated psychosocial func- analog scale, and food allergyerelated worry was rated on a 100-
tioning as part of routine clinical care. Practitioners identied their point visual analog scale. Parents provided a rating for each indi-
patients who were diagnosed with food allergies at clinic ap- vidual food allergy, and then composite variables were created as
pointments. Food allergies were diagnosed by allergists via one of the mean of the individual food allergy ratings.
several methods: skin prick testing, IgE testing, oral food challenge,
or clinical history. Within a week of their childs food allergy clinic Pediatric parenting stress
appointment, parents received an e-mail asking them to complete a Stress regarding parenting a child with a medical illness was
set of questionnaires about their childs food allergy and their assessed via the Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP).28 The PIP is a
psychosocial functioning. The e-mail also included a link to a 42-item parent self-report measure. Parents rate the items fre-
REDCap survey,26 an encrypted web-based application that is quency in the last week (1 indicating never to 5 indicating very
designed to support data capture for research studies. After often) and the level of difculty associated with it on a 5-point
completing questionnaires, parents reviewed an information page Likert-type scale (1 indicating not at all to 5 indicating
that indicated their deidentied responses would be included in a extremely). Frequency and difculty ratings are summed for an
research database. Parents had the option to opt out of their in- overall total frequency score and a total difculty score. Higher
clusion in this database. Only research team members had access to scores indicate greater pediatric parenting stress. The PIP has been
the deidentied data that were entered into the research database. used in diabetes samples and samples with other pediatric con-
A waiver of documentation of consent was approved for this proj- ditions.28e30 The Cronbach a values for this sample were 0.92 for
ect. Participants did not receive incentives. Approximately 34% of the frequency scale and 0.95 for the difculty scale.
all potential participants (N 303) completed the survey.
Food Allergy Quality of Lifeeparental burden
Parents food allergyerelated quality of life was assessed using
Participants
the Food Allergy Quality of LifeeParental Burden (FAQL-PB).31 The
A total of 103 parents who received clinical care at an urban FAQL-PB is a 17-item measure that assesses the effect of food al-
Mid-Atlantic food allergy clinic in a pediatric medical center lergy on parents daily lives on a 7-point Likert scale (0 indicating
completed the clinical assessment. Of these, 74 (72%) parents met not limited or troubled to 6 indicating extremely limited/troubled).
the inclusion criteria: child age between 9 months and 7 years A total score is derived by summing the items; higher scores
L.J. Herbert et al. / Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol xxx (2016) 1e6 3

indicate greater parental burden. This measure has been well (SD) child mealtime problem score of 3.57 (4.69) (range, 0e18), a
validated.31,32 The Cronbach a for this sample was 0.94. mean (SD) parent mealtime concerns score of 19.32 (5.28)
(range, 11e36), and a mean (SD) parent mealtime problem score
Statistical Analysis of 1.54 (2.16) (range, 0e9). Parents reported a mean (SD) total
frequency score of 70.93 (16.67) (range, 41e127) and a mean
All statistical analyses were based on the 74 participants who
(SD) total problem score of 5.11 (6.51) (range, 0e27) (Table 2).
completed the online survey and were conducted using SPSS sta-
The BPFAS scores were signicantly positively correlated with
tistical software, 23rd edition (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois). Pre-
each other (P < .001 for all) but were not related to number of
liminary descriptive statistics were generated for demographic and
food allergies, child age, parent age, or parent educational level
medical characteristics, the BPFAS, food allergy perceptions ratings,
(P > .05).
the PIP, and the FAQL-PB. Independent-samples t tests were con-
ducted comparing the mean BPFAS scores of this sample to pub-
Parenting Stress and Food AllergyeRelated Quality of Life
lished BPFAS data from typically developing and clinical
samples.15,21,33 Finally, Pearson Product Moment and Spearman r Parents reported a mean (SD) total frequency score on the PIP of
correlational analyses and a univariate regression analysis were 78.98 (21.11) (range, 46e140) and a mean (SD) total difculty score
conducted regarding the associations among demographic and of 68.18 (22.16) (range, 42e144) (Table 2). The BPFAS scores were
medical characteristics, BPFAS scores, food allergy perceptions, PIP signicantly positively correlated with PIP frequency and difculty
scores, and FAQL-PB scores. scores (P < .05 for all). Parents who reported greater mealtime
concerns also reported greater parenting stress related to parenting
Results a child with a medical illness. On the FAQL-PB, parents reported a
Participant Characteristics mean (SD) score of 1.76 (1.18) (range, 0e5). The FAQL-PB scores
were signicantly positively correlated with the BPFAS scores;
Table 1 lists the characteristics of the study participants. Chil- parents who reported greater mealtime concerns reported poorer
dren had a mean (SD) age of 3.57 (1.91) years. Most children were food allergyerelated quality of life. Finally, the BPFAS scores were
male (62%) and diagnosed with peanut (76%), tree nut (55%), or signicantly positively correlated with parents perceptions of their
direct egg (53%) allergies; 69% were diagnosed with more than one childs risk of allergen exposure; parents who reported greater
food allergy. Parents had a mean (SD) age of 36.32 (4.95) years. mealtime concerns also perceived a greater risk of allergen expo-
Most parents were female (92%) and white (44%) or African sure (P < .05 for all) (Table 3).
American (29%). Approximately half of parents had a graduate or A univariate regression analysis was conducted to assess the
professional degree (54%). relative contributions of parenting stress, food allergyerelated
In general, our sample reects the sex breakdown of our clinic quality of life, and perceived risk of allergen exposure on parents
population (62% vs 60% male). Our sample represents a slightly perceptions of mealtime behavioral concerns. The overall model
more white group of parents than our clinic population, which is was signicant (F3,67 13.50, P < .001). All 3 variables made a
25% white, 41% African American, 5% Asian American, 12% His- signicant contribution to mealtime behavioral concerns, with
panics, and 17% other race/ethnicity. parenting stress having the greatest impact (PIP: b .33, P < .001;
FAQL-PB: b .26, P < .001; risk of allergen exposure: b .20,
Mealtime Behavior P < .001).
On the BPFAS, parents reported a mean (SD) child mealtime
concerns frequency score of 51.61 (12.32) (range, 28e93), a mean Comparisons With Other Samples
Parents of children with food allergies reported signicantly
more mealtime problems than parents of typically developing
Table 1
Demographic and Food Allergy Characteristics of the 74 Study Participantsa children.33 Parents of children with food allergy reported more
frequent child mealtime concerns than parents of typically devel-
Characteristic Finding
oping children (t581 3.90, P < .0001) and were more likely to
Child age, mean (SD) [range], y 3.57 (1.91) [0.82e7.93]
Female children 28 (38.40)
Food allergies Table 2
Peanut 56 (75.70) Descriptive Statistics Regarding Mealtime Behavior, Parenting Stress, and Food
Tree nuts 41 (55.40) AllergyeRelated Parental Quality of Life
Direct egg 39 (53.40)
Baked egg 15 (23.10) Variable No. of Mean (SD) Range
Direct cows milk 21 (28.40) participants
Baked cows milk 12 (17.40)
Soy 9 (12.20) Behavioral Pediatric Feeding
Wheat 8 (10.80) Assessment Scale
Fish 11 (14.90) Child frequency 74 51.61 (12.32) 28.00e93.00
Shellsh 9 (12.30) Child problem 74 3.57 (4.69) 0.00e18.00
Diagnosed with >1 food allergy 51 (68.90) Parent frequency 74 19.32 (5.28) 11.00e36.00
Parent age, mean (SD) [range], y 36.32 (4.95) [23.92e50.93] Parent problem 74 1.54 (2.16) 0.00e9.00
Female parents 68 (91.90) Total frequency 74 70.93 (16.67) 41.00e127.00
Parent race/ethnicity Total problem 74 5.11 (6.51) 0.00e27.00
White 31 (44.30) Pediatric Inventory for Parents
African American 20 (28.60) Total frequency 71 78.98 (21.11) 46.00e140.00
Asian American 8 (11.40) Total difculty 71 68.18 (22.16) 42.00e144.00
Hispanic 4 (5.80) Food Allergy Quality of 74 1.76 (1.18) 0.00e5.50
Other 11 (15.70) LifeeParental Burden total score
Parent educational level of graduate or 39 (54.20) Mean perceived risk of allergen 74 1.24 (0.49) 0.09e2.60
professional degree exposure
a
Mean perceived food allergy severity 67 52.36 (24.02) 4.00e100.00
Data are presented as number (percentage) of participants unless otherwise Mean food allergy worry 72 63.35 (24.48) 10.00e100.00
indicated.
4 L.J. Herbert et al. / Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol xxx (2016) 1e6

Table 3
Correlations Among Parents Mealtime Concerns and Food Allergy Perceptions

BPFAS Perceived risk of allergen exposure Perceived food allergy severity Food allergy worry PIP- frequency PIP- difculty FAQL-PB

Child frequency .25a .20 .03 .48b .33c .42b


Child problem .19 .13 .13 .44b .26a .39c
Parent frequency .40b .13 .15 .53b .43b .49b
Parent problem .28a .15 .18 .48b .38c .37c
Total frequency .31b .19 .07 .53b .38c .47b
Total problem .23a .14 .15 .47b .31c .40b

Abbreviations: BPFAS, Behavioral Pediatric Feeding Assessment Scale; FAQL-PB, Food Allergy Quality of LifeeParental Burden; PIP, Pediatric Inventory for Parents.
a
P < .05.
b
P < .001.
c
P < .01.

report these behaviors as a problem than parents of typically result in acutely severe and life-threatening anaphylaxis, mealtime
developing children (t581 3.36, P < .001). Similarly, parents of behavioral concerns may be most related to the fact that a strict
children with food allergy reported more frequent parent mealtime diet is required of both children with type 1 diabetes and food
concerns than parents of typically developing children (t581 3.50, allergy.
P < .001) and were more likely to report that these concerns were a Finally, mealtime concerns were strongly related to other
problem than parents of typically developing children (t581 3.83, parent perceptions of food allergy, such as risk of allergen
P < .001) (Table 4). exposure, food allergyerelated quality of life, and illness-
When compared with parents of children with type 1 diabetes, related parenting stress. These ndings indicate that the par-
parents of children with food allergy reported more frequent child ents who are mostly likely to experience mealtime concerns are
mealtime concerns (t206 3.06, P < .01), but parents concerns in parents who report general psychosocial functioning concerns
other areas were comparable between the 2 samples (P > .05). as well. This is consistent with ndings that increased
Finally, when compared with parents of children with diagnosed worry regarding food allergy correlates with decreased quality
feeding disorders with or without related medical factors, parents of life.
of children with food allergy consistently reported fewer mealtime
concerns (P < .001) for all. See Table 4 for additional details. Of note, Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions
the food allergy sample was younger than the type 1 diabetes
sample (mean, 3.57 vs 5.33 years). This study is the rst to assess mealtime behaviors among
children with food allergy compared with typically developing
children and examine the association of mealtime behaviors with
Discussion
quality of life. Results were based on large sample sizes, and the
This is the rst study to examine the effect of mealtime con- food allergy sample was racially diverse. Limitations to this study
cerns among a diverse sample of children with food allergy. Par- include the cross-sectional design, reliance on internet-based
ents of children with food allergies reported signicantly more questionnaires, and the restricted age group of the children with
mealtime problems than typically developing children. Several food allergies (as necessitated by the validated mealtime behavior
factors may explain why mealtime concerns are more common measure). It is uncertain whether the ndings are generalizable to
among parents of children with food allergies. Allergic reactions older age groups, but they are nonetheless important because early
may contribute to child and/or parental fear about trying new childhood is developmentally when parents have primary re-
foods and anxiety about eating previously introduced foods that sponsibility for mealtime behaviors. Parents were the sole source of
are similar to the allergen.34e36 Indeed, food avoidance among information, and parental perceptions may not necessarily align
children with food allergy has a stronger association with anxiety with those of children. Finally, there were no data on whether
regarding allergic reactions than medical recommendations children were also diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis, a
regarding elimination diets.37 Very young children who are unable condition that may have a more severe effect on mealtime behav-
to communicate about their anxiety and physical symptoms may iors than IgE-mediated food allergy.
cry, have tantrums, or refuse to eat, so parents may hesitate to Future research should replicate these ndings among a longi-
feed children certain foods or alter mealtime patterns because tudinal sample that has access to in-person or telephone partici-
they are uncertain if child behavior is due to an allergic reaction or pation and should include more objective measures of feeding
general food pickiness.34 Further complicating feeding is that concerns (ie, observational studies). Additional details regarding
elimination diets may affect overall growth and nutrition; parents food allergy and general medical history may further elucidate the
may be concerned about meeting nutritional guidelines; feel way that food allergies may affect nutritional concerns and meal-
pressured to ensure that their child eats an appropriate amount of time behavior (ie, epinephrine autoinjector prescription, allergic
protein, carbohydrates, and vitamins; and engage in maladaptive reaction history, length of food allergy diagnosis, history of feeding
mealtime behaviors.34,38e40 Avoiding allergens may also lead to a difculties, growth difculties, and/or appointments with a regis-
monotonous diet,41 which may adversely affect mealtime tered dietician). It will be advantageous to also examine how par-
behaviors. ents mealtime behavioral concerns affect childrens intake (ie,
Parents of children with food allergies reported signicantly examine food records). Finally, there is little information about
fewer mealtime behavioral problems than children with diag- older childrens feeding concerns and patterns, so inclusion of older
nosed feeding concerns. Compared with another pediatric chronic children in future studies is warranted. As the body of literature
illness that affects diet, type 1 diabetes, parents of children with regarding feeding concerns among children with food allergy in-
food allergy reported signicantly more frequent child mealtime creases, it will be possible to develop clinical guidelines regarding
concerns but similar perceptions regarding whether these child the assessment of feeding concerns among patients with food al-
behaviors were a problem and similar perceptions regarding lergy and advocate for appropriate referral to psychologists and
parent mealtime concerns. Although ingestion of an allergen may registered dieticians who may be able to provide intervention.
L.J. Herbert et al. / Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol xxx (2016) 1e6 5

Conclusions

t Score

3.06b

0.80

0.74

1.38
Parents of young children with food allergy report more

Type 1 diabetes (n 134)


behavioral mealtime concerns than parents of typically developing

206

206

206

206
children and comparable concerns with parents of children with

df
other pediatric illnesses, such as type 1 diabetes. Mealtime con-
cerns were related to parents other perceptions about the childs

18.78 (4.92)
46.84 (9.8)

4.11 (4.66)

1.97 (2.14)
Mean (SD)
food allergy and may be an appropriate area for intervention.
Future research should investigate feeding concerns over time
and how food allergies and maladaptive mealtime behaviors affect
nutrition. These data may help clinicians better serve patients with
food allergy by identifying which families may need psychosocial
or nutritional support in addition to medical guidance. In particular,
Medical conditions requiring devices (n 154)

parents would likely benet from additional assistance in choosing


t Score

9.40a

7.21a

a
9.39

6.66

nutritionally appropriate hypoallergenic formulas, vitamin and


mineral supplements, and other food alternatives to ensure chil-
dren on avoidance diets receive a balanced, healthy diet.
BPFAS Comparisons Among Parents of Children With Food Allergy, Type 1 Diabetes, Feeding Disorders, Medical Conditions Requiring Feeding Devices, and Healthy Children

226

226

226

226

References
df

[1] Gupta R, Springston E, Warrier M, et al. The prevelance, severity, and distri-
bution of childhood food allergy in the United States. Pediatrics. 2011;128:
e9ee17.
[2] Branum A, Lukacs S. Food allergy among children in the United States. Pedi-
67.8 (12.1)
Mean (SD)

atrics. 2009;124:1549e1555.
26.9 (5.9)
9.0 (5.6)

4.0 (2.8)

[3] Turnbull J, Adamsn H, Gorard D. Review article: The diagnosis and management
of food allergy and food intolerances. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:3e25.
[4] Sampson HA, Aceves S, Bock SA, et al. Food allergy: a practice parameter
update- 2014. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:1016e1025.
[5] Muraro A, Werfel T, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, et al. EAACI food allergy and
anaphylaxis guidelines: diagnosis and management of food allergy. Allergy.
t Score

2014;69:1008e1025.
8.77a

9.28a

a
Other feeding disorders (n 64)

6.78

6.62

[6] Komulainen J. Parental burden in families with a young food-allergic child.


Child Care Pract. 2010;16:287e302.
[7] Kim J, Sicherer S. Living with food allergy: Allergen avoidance. Pediatr Clin
North Am. 2011;58:459e470.
136

136

136

136

[8] Allen C, Bidarkar M, vanNunen S, Campbell D. Factors impacting parental


df

burden in food allergic children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51:696e698.


[9] Abdurrahman Z, Kastner M, Wurman C, et al. Experiencing a rst food allergic
reaction: a survey of parent and caregiver perspectives. Allergy Asthma Clin
72.4 (15.5)
Mean (SD)

Immunol. 2013;9:18.
11.7 (5.6)

27.5 (8.7)

4.4 (2.9)

[10] Mandell D, Curtis R, Gold M, Hardie S. Anaphylaxis: how do you live with it?
Health Soc Work. 2005;30:325e335.
[11] Herbert L, Shemesh E, Bender B. Clinical management of psychosocial coc-
nerns related to food allergy. J Clin Allergy Immunol Pract. 2016;4:205e213.
[12] Dahlquist L, Power T, Hahn A, et al. Parenting and independent problem-
t Score

3.36b

b
3.90a

solving in preschool children with food allergy. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015;40:


3.50

3.83
Healthy norms (n 509)

96e108.
[13] Lefton-Greif M, Arvedson J. Pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders: State
of health, population trends, and application of the International Classica-
581

581

581

581

tion of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Semin Speech Lang. 2007;28:


df

161e165.
[14] Berlin KS, Davies WH, Lobato DJ, Silverman AH. A biopsychosocial model of
45.6 (12.4)
Mean (SD)

16.9 (5.6)

0.70 (1.7)

normative and problematic pediatric feeding. Child Health Care. 2009;38:


2.0 (3.6)

263e282.
[15] Crist WP, Napier-Phillips AB. Mealtime behaviors of young children: a com-
parison of normative and clinical cata. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2001;22:279e286.
[16] Manikam R, Perman JA. Pediatric feeding disorders. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;
Food allergy (n 74)

30:34e46.
[17] Kerzner B, Milano K, MacLean WJ, Berall G, Stuart S, Chatoor I. A practical
approach to classifying and managing feeding difculties. Pediatrics. 2015;
51.61 (12.32)

135:344e353.
19.32 (5.28)
3.57 (4.69)

1.54 (2.16)
Mean (SD)

[18] Patton S, Dolan L, Powers S. Differences in family mealtime interactions be-


tween young children with type 1 diabetes and controls: Implications for
behavioral intervention. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33:885e893.
[19] Powers SW, Byars KC, Mitchell MJ, Patton SR, Standiford DA, Dolan LM. Parent
report of mealtime behavior and parenting stress in young children with type
1 diabetes and in healthy control subjects. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:313e318.
[20] Patton S, Williams L, Dolan L, Chen M, Powers S. Feeding problems reported
by parents of young children with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy
and their associations with childrens glycemic control. Pediatr Diabetes.
Parents mealtime concerns
Parent mealtime concerns

2009;10:455e460.
Child mealtime concerns

[21] Monaghan M, Herbert L, Wang J, Holmes C, Cogen F, Streisand R. Mealtime


concernseproblem

behavior and diabetes-specic parent functioning in young children with


type 1 diabetes. Health Psychol. 2015;34:794e801.
Child mealtime

[22] Yeung K, Taylor TR, Scheimann A, et al. The prevalence of food allergies in
efrequency

efrequency

children referred to a multidisciplinary feeding program. Clin Pediatr. 2015;


eproblem

54:1081e1086.
P ! .001.
P < .01.
Table 4

[23] Meyer R, Rommel N, Van Oudenhove L, Fleming C, Dziubak R, Shah N. Feeding


BPFAS

difculties in children with food protein-induced gastrointestinal allergies.


J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:1764e1769.
b
a
6 L.J. Herbert et al. / Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol xxx (2016) 1e6

[24] Maslin K, Dean T, Arshad S, Venter C. Fussy eating and feeding difculties in [32] Knibb R, Stalker C. Validation of the Food Allergy Quality of Life: Parental
infants and toddlers consuming a cows milk exclusion diet. Pediatr Allergy Burden Questionnaire in the UK. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1841e1849.
Immunol. 2015;26:503e508. [33] Dovey T, Jordan C, Aldridge V, Martin C. Screening for feeding disorders:
[25] Wu Y, Franciosi J, Rothenberg M, Hommel K. Behavioral feeding problems and Creating critical values using the Behavioural Pediatrics Feeding Assessment
parenting stress in eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders in children. Pediatr Scale. Appetite. 2013;69:108e113.
Allergy Immunol. 2012;23:730e735. [34] Haas A. Feeding disorders in food allergic children. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep.
[26] Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research elec- 2010;10:258e264.
tronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workow [35] Rigal N, Reiter F, Morice C, De Boissieu D, Dupont C. Food allergy in the child:
process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed an exploratory study on the impact of the elimination diet on food neophobia.
Inform. 2009;42:377e381. Arch Pediatr. 2005;12:1714e1720.
[27] Patton SR, Dolan LM, Powers SW. Parent report of mealtime behaviors in [36] Polloni L, Baldi I, Lazzarotto F, Gregori D, Muraro A. Multidimensional analysis
young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Implications for better of food-allergic children and adolescents self-concept: a comparison with a
assessment of dietary adherence problems in the clinic. J Dev Behav Pediatr. healthy matched sample. J Health Psychol. 2013;20:850e857.
2006;27:202e208. [37] Le T, Zijlstra W, van Optal E, et al. Food avoidance in children with adverse
[28] Streisand RP, Braniecki S, Tercyak KP, Kazak AE. Childhood illness-related food reactions: Inuence of anxiety and clinical parameters. Pediatr Allergy
parenting stress: The Pediatric Inventory for Parents. J Pediatr Psychol. Immunol. 2013;24:650e655.
2001;26:155e162. [38] Robbins K, Wood R, Keet C. Milk allergy is associated with decreased growth
[29] Preston A, Storch EA, Lewin A, et al. Parental stress and maladjustment in in US children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:1466e1468.e1466.
children with short stature. Clin Pediatr. 2005;44:327e331. [39] Berry M, Adams J, Voutilainen H, Feustel P, Celestin J, Jarvinen K. Impact of
[30] Streisand R, Swift E, Wickmark T, Chen R, Holmes C. Pediatric parenting stress elimination diets on growth and nutritional status in children with multiple
among parents of children with type 1 diabetes: the role of self-efcacy, re- food allergies. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015;26:133e138.
sponsibility, and fear. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005;30:513e521. [40] Flammarion S, Santos C, Guimber D, et al. Diet and nutritional status of
[31] Cohen B, Noone S, Munoz-Furlong A, Sicherer S. Development of a ques- children with food allergies. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011;22:161e165.
tionnaire to measure quality of life in families with a child with food allergy. [41] Pollini L, Toniolo A, Lazzarotto F, et al. Nutritional behavior and attitudes in
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:1159e1163. food allergic children and their mothers. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013;3:41.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen