Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chain Management
BBA/BBA-BI/BBA-TT/BCIS/BCA/BHM
It will be apparent that supply chain management involves a significant change from the
traditional arms-length, even adversarial, relationships that so often typified
buyer/supplier relationships in the past. The focus of supply chain management is on
co-operation and trust and the recognition that, properly managed, the whole can be
greater than the sum of its parts. Thus the definition of supply chain management
adopted is:
Thus the focus of supply chain management is upon the management of relationships in
order to achieve a more profitable outcome for all parties in the chain. This brings with
it some significant challenges since there may be occasions when the narrow self-
interest of one party has to be subsumed for the benefit of the chain as a whole.
The source of competitive advantage is found firstly in the ability of the organization to
differentiate itself, in the eyes of the customer, from its competition, and secondly by
operating at a lower cost and hence at greater profit. Seeking a sustainable and
defensible competitive advantage has become the concern of every manager who is
alert to the realities of the marketplace. It is no longer acceptable to assume that good
products will sell themselves, neither is it advisable to imagine that success today will
carry forward into tomorrow. Let us consider the bases of success in any competitive
context. At its most elemental, commercial success derives from either a cost advantage
or a value advantage or, ideally, both. It is as simple as that the most profitable
competitor in any industry sector tends to be the lowest-cost producer or the supplier
providing a product with the greatest perceived differentiated values.
Put very simply, successful companies either have a cost advantage or they have a value
advantage, or even better a combination of the two. Cost advantage gives a lower
Logistics management, from systems viewpoint, is the means whereby the needs of
customers are satisfied through the co-ordination of the materials and information
flows that extend from the marketplace, through the firm and its operations and beyond
that to suppliers. To achieve this company-wide integration clearly requires a quite
different orientation than that typically encountered in the conventional organization.
For example, for many years marketing and manufacturing have been seen as largely
separate activities within the organization. At best they have coexisted, at worst there
has been open warfare. Manufacturing priorities and objectives have typically been
focused on operating efficiency, achieved through long production runs, minimized set-
ups and change-over and product standardization. On the other hand, marketing has
sought to achieve competitive advantage through variety, high service levels and
frequent product changes.
Equally there has been a growing recognition of the critical role that procurement plays
in creating and sustaining competitive advantage as part of an integrated logistics
process. Leading-edge organizations now routinely include supply-side issues in the
development of their strategic plans. not only is the cost of purchased materials and
supplies a significant part of total costs in most organizations, but there is a major
opportunity for leveraging the capabilities and competencies of suppliers through
closer integration of the buyers and suppliers logistics processes. In this scheme of
things, logistics is therefore essentially an integrative concept that seeks to develop a
system-wide view of the firm. It is fundamentally a planning concept that seeks to create
a framework through which the needs of the marketplace can be translated into a
manufacturing strategy and plan, which in turn links into a strategy and plan for
procurement. Ideally there should be a one-plan mentality within the business which
seeks to replace the conventional stand-alone and separate plans of marketing,
distribution, production and procurement. This, quite simply, is the mission of logistics
management.
A: Pre- transaction Phase: This Phase is more related to policy delivery for defining
the service level and related activities in quantitative and qualitative terms. It is non-
routine activity and gives guidelines to operating people, regarding the dimensions and
limitations on the customer service activities of the firm. Following are the important
elements of the pre-transaction phase.
a. Customer Service Policy: This indicates the service standard of the firm. The
firm has to evolve the policy framework for performance measures. For example,
the caterpillar, a leading manufacturer of Construction Company, makes a policy
commitment to deliver spare parts to customers within 24 hours of placements
of order. Further it promises free supply, if the parts reached after the stipulated
time.
b. Service Organization: For implementing policy directives on customer service
the form should formalize the reporting structure, delegate authority and
allocate responsibility. The contact persons contact number, name need to be
informed to the customers for getting information on order status, dispatch
details, warranty claims etc.
5. What are the customer service elements for which standards should be set?
Answer: To maintain the customer to service it is necessary to set the various service
standards. There must be complete match between what the customer expects and
what the firm willing and able to provide. This may require negotiation of service
standards between the supplier and the buyer.
What are the customer service elements for which standards should be set?
There are internal service standards. In many respects theses mirror the standards that
external customers place upon the firm. As far as theses external standards are
concerned they must be defined by the customers themselves. The areas where the
standards are essentials are as follows:
a. Order Cycle time: This is the time elapsed from order to delivery. Standards
should be defined against customers requirements.
b. Stock Availability: This relates to percentage of demand for given line items
that can be met from the available inventory. The supplier should maintain the
stocks standards to make the product available to customers at right time.
c. Order- size constraints: Most customer wants Just- in- time deliveries in small
lot size in frequent manner as this firm or buyer cam]n eliminates its inventory
holding cost. The firms must fix standard of order to minimize the future
complexities.
d. Ordering Convenience: The ordering convenience may differ on the nature of
products. The question may arise to set the standard how are we seen from the
customers view point? Do the firms systems talk to buyers system?
The successful achievement of defined mission goals involves inputs from a large
number of functional areas and activity centers within the firm. Thus an effective
logistics costing system must seek to determine the total systems cost of meeting
desired logistic objectives (the output of the system) and the costs of the various
inputs involved in meeting these outputs. Interest has been growing in an approach to
this problem, known as mission costing.
More recently there has been a further development in that the concept of economic
value added (EVA) has become widely used and linked to the creation of shareholder
value. Essentially EVA is the difference between operating income after taxes less the
true cost of capital employed to generate those profits. Thus,
Economic value added (EVA) = (Profit after tax True cost of capital employed)
Note: If Cost of capital is greater than profit after tax results negative EVA, which erode
the shareholders value in long run. And positive EVA enhances the shareholders value.
If the net present value of expected future EVAs were to be calculated this would
generate a measure of wealth known as market value added (MVA), which is a true
measure of what the business is worth to its shareholders. A simple definition of MVA is:
The impact of logistics service can have upon net operating income (profit) and also
have impact on capital efficiency (asset turn). Many companies have come to realize the
effect that lengthy pipelines and highly capital-intensive logistics facilities can have on
EVA and hence shareholder value. As a result they have focused on finding ways in
which pipelines can be shortened and, consequently, working capital requirements
reduced.
The common theme that links these points is that we seem to suffer in business from a
lack of visibility of costs as they are incurred through the logistics pipeline. Ideally what
logistics management requires is a means of capturing costs as products and orders
flow towards the customer.
The advantage of using activity-based costing is that it enables each customers unique
characteristics in terms of ordering behavior and distribution requirements to be
separately accounted for. Once the cost attached to each level of activity is
There are certain parallels between activity-based costing and the idea of mission
costing introduced earlier in this chapter. Essentially mission costing seeks to identify
the unique costs that are generated as a result of specific logistics/customer service
strategies aimed at targeted market segments. The aim is to establish a better matching
of the service needs of the various markets that the company addresses with the
inevitably limited resources of the company. There is little point in committing
incremental costs where the incremental benefits do not justify the expenditure.
There are four stages in the implementation of an effective mission costing process:
a. Define the customer service segment: The basic principle is that because not
all customers share the same service requirements and characteristics they
should be treated differently.
b. Identify the factors that produce variations in the cost of service: This step
involves the determination of the service elements that will directly or indirectly
impact upon the costs of service, e.g. the product mix, the delivery characteristics
such as drop size and frequency or incidence of direct deliveries, merchandising
support, special packs and so on.
c. Identify the specific resources used to support customer segments: This is
the point at which the principles of activity-based costing and mission costing
coincide. The basic tenet of ABC is that the activities that generate cost should be
defined and the specific cost drivers involved identified. These may be the
number of lines on an order, the people involved, the inventory support or the
delivery frequency.
d. Attribute activity costs by customer type or segment: Using the principle of
avoid ability the incremental costs incurred through the application of a specific
resource to meeting service needs are attributed to customers. It must be
emphasized that this is not cost allocation but cost attribution. In other words it
is because customers use resources that the appropriate share of cost is
attributed to them.
The basic purpose of logistics cost analysis is to provide managers with reliable
information that will enable a better allocation of resources to be achieved. Given that
the purpose of logistics and supply chain management, as we have observed, ultimately
is concerned to meet customer service requirements in the most cost effective way, then
it is essential that those responsible have the most accurate and meaningful data
possible.
The types of issues that need to be assessed in supplier and distributor benchmarking
are such questions as
Willingness to work as a partner/ co- maker
Commitment to continuous improvement
Acceptance of innovation and change
Focus on throughput time reduction
Utilization of quality management procedure
Flexibility in logistical system
Does employee actively seek to improve communication with the firm?
The ultimate guide to the selection of benchmark priorities has to be the impact that an
activity of function has upon competitive advantage (relative cost and relative value).
The firm only can get competitive advantage in the market place if the firm able to
differentiate its products from its competitors or market leaders. The figure below
highlights the competitive goal.
Each of these steps/components in the chain will consume time. Because of bottlenecks,
inefficient processes and fluctuations in the volume of orders handled there will often
be considerable variation in the time taken for these various activities to be completed.
The overall effect can lead to a substantial reduction in the reliability of delivery.
Lead Time Gap= (Logistical Lead time- Customers Order Cycle time)
Where,
Logistics Lead Time: It is the total time it takes to complete the manufacturing and
supply of a product. In other words, it takes time to source raw materials, convert them
into products and move them into the market.
Customer Order Cycle Time: It is the time that customer is prepared to wait, from
when the order is placed through to when the goods are received. This is the maximum
period available for order fulfillment. In some cases this may be measured in months
but in others it is measured in hours. Market as well as the nature of the product will
influence the customers willingness to wait. Thus a customer may be willing to wait a
few weeks for delivery of a car with particular options but only a day for a new set of
tyres.
c. Kanban
There is now emerging an alternative way of managing demand. In this revised model
the customer no longer places orders but instead shares information with the vendor.
This information relates to the actual usage or sales of their product, their current on-
hand inventory and details of any additional marketing activity such as promotions. On
the basis of this information, the supplier takes responsibility for replenishment of the
customers inventory. No orders are received, but instead an indication is given by the
customer of the upper and lower limits of stock that they wish to keep on hand. It is the
responsibility of the supplier to maintain the customers inventory within the specified
stock bands. The benefit to the customer is that inventory levels can be significantly
A Dharma Raj Upreti Courseware/Logistics & Supply Chain Management/OCEM/2015 Page 25
reduced whilst the risk of stock-outs diminishes. Furthermore it is often the case that
the customer does not pay for the inventory until after it has been sold or used so
there is a considerable cash flow benefit. The advantage to the supplier is that because
they have direct access to information on real demand, usually transmitted through
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) or web-based systems, they can much better plan and
schedule production and distribution-thus improving capacity utilization and at the
same time the requirement for safety stock is considerably reduced.
These days most companies are familiar with the idea of mission statements as an
articulation of the vision of the business. The mission statement seeks to define the
purpose of the business, its boundaries and its aspirations. It is now by no means
uncommon for organizations to have such statements for the business as a whole and
for key constituent components. What some companies have found is that there can be
significant benefits to defining the logistics vision of the firm.
The purpose of the logistics vision statement is to give a clear indication of the basis on
which the business intends to build a position of advantage through closer customer
relationships. Such statements are never easy to construct. There is always the danger
that they will descend into vague motherhood statements that give everyone a warm
feeling but provide no guidelines for action.
Ideally the logistics vision should be built around the simple issue of How do we intend
to use logistics and supply chain management to create value for our customers? To
operationalise this idea will necessitate a detailed understanding of how customer value
is (or could be) created and delivered in the markets in which the business competes.
Value chain analysis will be a fundamental element in this investigation, as will the
The four elements of logistics-derived customer value are Better, Faster, Cheaper,
Closer and the criterion for a good logistics vision statement is that it should provide
the roadmap for how these four goals are to be achieved.
15. Explain the problems with conventional organization in terms of logistic &
supply chain management.
Answer: Amongst experienced observers and commentators of the logistics
management process there is general agreement that the major barrier to the
implementation of the logistics concept is organizational. In other words, a major
impediment to change in this crucial managerial area is the entrenched and rigid
organizational structure that most established companies are burdened with.
There is a great danger that those companies that do not recognize the need for
organizational change, or that lack the will to make it happen, will never achieve the
improvements in competitive advantage that integrated logistics management can
bring. The argument advanced here is that the demands of the marketplace for
enhanced service provision combined with dramatically heightened competition call for
a paradigm shift in the way in which we think about our organizations.
The concept of integrated supply chain management, whereby flows of information and
material between source and user are co-ordinated and managed as a system, is now
widely understood, if not widely implemented. The logic of linking each step of the
process as materials and products move towards the customer is based upon the
principles of optimization. In other words, the goal is to maximize customer service
whilst simultaneously minimizing costs and reducing assets locked up in the logistics
pipeline.
The Japanese, not surprisingly, have led the way in developing techniques for set-up
time reduction. Single minute exchange of die, or SMED, is the goal in many Japanese
plants. In other words continuous attention by management and the workforce is
focused upon the ways in which set-up times can be reduced.
Sometimes it will involve new technology, but more often than not it is achieved
through taking a totally different look at the process itself. In many cases set-up times
have been reduced from hours down to minutes, simply by questioning the
conventional wisdom. What in effect we are seeing is a fundamental shift away from the
economies of scale model, which is volume based and hence implies long production
runs with few change-overs, to the economies of scope model, which is based upon
producing small quantities of a wider range, hence requiring more change-overs.
The marketing advantages that such flexibility brings are considerable. It means that in
effect the company can cater for the precise needs of multiple customers, and they can
offer even higher levels of customization. In todays marketplace where customers seek
individuality and where segments or niches are getting ever smaller, a major source of