Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
To cite this article: Navaratnarajah Sathiparan (2015): Mesh type seismic retrofitting for masonry
structures: critical issues and possible strategies, European Journal of Environmental and Civil
Engineering, DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2015.1005160
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
Content) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or
howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising
out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1005160
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka
(Received 22 August 2014; accepted 5 January 2015)
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
The tremendous loss of life that resulted in the aftermath of recent earthquakes in
developing countries is mostly due to the collapse of non-engineered building struc-
tures. It has been observed that these buildings cannot withstand the lateral loads
imposed by an earthquake and often fails, in a brittle manner. This underscores the
urgency to nd simple and economic solutions to reinforce these buildings. Different
conventional retrotting techniques are available to increase the strength and/or duc-
tility of unreinforced masonry walls. Recent years, several researches work on mesh
type retrotting for masonry structures to delay or prevent the collapse of buildings
and reduce the number of lives lost during devastating earthquake events. This paper
reviews and discusses the state-of-the-art on seismic retrotting of masonry walls
with emphasis on the mesh type retrotting techniques include retrotting
procedures, cost, improvement in structural performance and limitations.
Keywords: earthquake; masonry; seismic retrotting; meshes
1. Introduction
Natural disasters are causing tremendous loss of life and property with earthquakes
being the most serious risk. As shown in the Figure 1 (Guha-Sapir, Hoyois, & Below,
2013; Guha-Sapir, Vos, Below, & Ponserre, 2011, 2012; Hoyois, Scheuren, Below,
Guha-Sapir, & Ponserre, 2007; Jha, Duyne Barenstein, Phelps, Pittet, & Sena, 2010;
Rodriguez, Vos, Below, & Guha-Sapir, 2009; Scheuren, Le Polain de Waroux, Below,
Guha-Sapir, & Ponserre, 2008; Vos, Rodriguez, Below, & Guha-Sapir, 2010), in last
two decades, about 96% of the fatalities attributed to earthquakes are caused in
developing countries or least developing countries. Figure 2 shows the breakdown of
the fatalities due to earthquakes in the period of 19001999 to different causes. About
75% of the fatalities attributed to earthquakes are caused by the collapse of buildings
and the greatest proportion is from the collapse of masonry buildings (Coburn &
Spence, 2002).
The result of earthquake damage investigations and studies conducted in earthquake-
prone regions has revealed that the masonry constructed type buildings would collapse
within a few seconds during earthquake movement, and does become a major cause of
human fatalities. Major types of problems and basic damage patterns observed during
earthquakes in this type of buildings are summarised in Figure 3.
*Email: sakthi@cee.ruh.ac.lk
Figure 1. Disaster fatalities by of disaster between year 1991 and 2012 (left) and earthquake
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
Figure 3. Building damages during Sichuan 2008 earthquake (a) lack of structural integrity, (b)
out-of-plane failure, (c) in-plane failure.
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 3
In-plane lateral loads induce shearing deformations in masonry walls. This deformation
elongates one diagonal, including tension, and shortens the other, including compression
perpendicular to the tension. Since masonry materials have much lower strength in
tension than compression, in-plane forces typically induce diagonal cracking perpendicu-
lar to the tension axis. It is very common for seismic loading to induce X cracking in
masonry structures, resulting from in-plane loading in alternate directions, as shown in
the Figure 3(c).
repairing process, (ii) improving the in-plane strength of the wall by local member retro-
tting and (iii) Improving the structural integrity of the whole structure (Sivaraja &
Thandavamoorthy, 2014).
2.1. Repair
The main purpose of repairs is to bring back the architectural shape of the house and
immediate occupancy of residents is resumed quickly. The repair does not pretend to
improve the structural strength of the house and can be vulnerable to future earthquake.
2.2. Restoration
The main purpose of restoration is to carry out structural repairs to load bearing
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
2.3. Strengthening
Strengthening methods, unlike repair or restoration, should not be limited to increasing
the strength of members that have been damaged, but should consider the overall behav-
iour of the structure. Therefore, strengthening methods improve the ductility capacity
and energy dissipation capacity of the masonry structure. Arya, Boen, and Ishiyama
(2012) reported strengthening procedures should aim at one or more of the following
objectives:
For the seismic safety of the structure, good connections between walls and oors
or foundations, between adjacent walls and between walls and roof are essential.
Integrity of masonry can prevent large pieces of debris to fall out and injure inhabitants.
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 5
Considering these facts, recent years, several researches work on mesh type retrotting
for masonry structures to delay or prevent the collapse of buildings and reduce the num-
ber of lives lost during devastating earthquake events.
bending and inertia forces in transverse walls (out-of-plane) to the supporting shear walls
(in-plane), as well as restraining the shear force between adjoining walls and minimising
vertical crack propagation. The horizontal and vertical bands should be tied together and
to the other structural elements (foundations, roof, etc.) by means of nylon string. This
attachment provides a stable matrix, which is inherently stronger than the individual com-
ponents. Figure 5 shows the construction procedure during the retrotting of the full-scale
house model using one of the mesh type retrotting methods using PP-band mesh
(National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal [NSET], 2009).
According to Sathiparan, Mayorca, and Meguro (2008), there is a trend towards a
signicant increase in cracking in masonry wall retrotted by meshes, which is
generated by the incompatibility of deformation between the masonry and meshes.
Figure 4. Various mesh type retrotting techniques used for masonry structures. (a) and (e)
reproduced from Tetley and Madabhushi (2007).
6 N. Sathiparan
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
Figure 5. Procedure for mesh type retrotting (PP-band retrotting). Reproduced with permission
from National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET) (2009).
Generally mesh distributed the stress through the cracks, transferring it to the undam-
aged portions of the structure. As a result, new cracks appeared. By allowing cracking
without the loss of wall integrity, the meshes enhance structural ductility and energy
dissipation capacity while holding disintegrated structural elements together, thus
preventing collapse. In addition, the effectiveness of the retrot is highly dependent on
how tightly the mesh is attached to the structure. The tighter the mesh is attached, the
earlier its effects will be observed (Sathiparan et al., 2008).
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 7
Polymer Soft polymer mesh can be easily Tough nature of material and lack
deformed so transportation, of exibility makes Industrial geo-
application and removal are easy grid application and removal is
difcult
Polymer mesh requires use and
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
processing of petrochemicals,
which is not sustainable unless
sourced from recycled or re-used
units
Plastic The materials used are light and It takes a very long time to
carrier exible construct the mesh, which is a
bag Carrier bags are incredibly cheap barrier for this method unless the
Carrier bags are normally sent to mesh manufacture can be
landll or thrown away. Reusing industrialised/streamlined in some
these bags is therefore considered a way
sustainable solution
assessing them according to seismic safety. Based on that suitability of polymer mesh
and PP-band mesh retrotting method are considered as strong option; bamboo mesh,
steel mesh and plastic carrier bag retrotting method are considered as moderate option
for application in developing communities (Smith & Redman, 2009).
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 11
dissipation (Pandey, 2002). The materials used in mesh type retrotting have a relatively
low stiffness compared to the masonry walls. Because of this, they did not contribute to
increase the walls initial strength. Although some differences are observed, these are
due to: (1) mortar overlay presence, (2) bonding between mortar overlay and masonry
wall and (3) variability of masonry properties due to the workmanship effect. The
retrotting material mesh contribution was only observed after the wall cracked.
Table 5 shows the structural performance comparison for different mesh type retro-
tting method. Although these methods were not improving the initial peak strength of
the structures, but improve the residual strength, deformation capacity and energy dissi-
pation by a high margin. Because of the type of test conducted and material used were
varied, it is difcult to make direct comparisons regarding the structural performance of
the techniques. However, test results show that behaviour factor achieved by these
methods is more than the range of values of behaviour factor for reinforced masonry
construction which is proposed in the Eurocode 8 (BS EN 19981, 2004).
Table 5. Structural performance comparison for different mesh type retrotting methods.
Improvement
Retrotting Performance (comparison to
methods Reference Test type parameter reference wall)
Steel mesh Tetley and Madabhushi Shaking Collapse ~2
(2007) table test acceleration
Kadam et al. (2014) Diagonal Residual 4.510
shear test strength
Behaviour 5.4
factor
Polymer Varum et al. (2014) Cyclic Shear ~1.2
shear test resistance
Deformation 1.8
capacity
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
5.3. Technology
Self-construction is a major practice in developing countries (Dixit, 2004), it is
necessary to propose a simple method to understand and easy to implement retrotting
schemes. These strengthening methods are more complicated for implemented in the
local sites than during laboratory testing. Special care has taken into consideration
during foundation level, roof level and closer to opening.
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 13
eral organizations (JBIC, 2007; Meguro, 2010; Numada, Watanabe, Kuroda, & Meguro,
2013). Figure 7 shows the public demonstration at Muzaffarabad, Pakistan, one of the
most hit areas during 2005 Kashmir earthquake (Meguro, 2010). The main feedback
from the community after the demonstration was that community members were also
motivated by the need for earthquake safety, keen to retrot their homes but concerned
over the cost of retrotting. This type demonstration may improve peoples disaster
awareness.
Figure 6. Training programmes for masons. Reproduced with permission from National Society
for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET) (2009).
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 15
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
the masonry structures. Initial research conducted by Nissanka and Priyankara (2014).
There has been no other research into the strengthening of masonry using plants, so
there are no data for these results to be compared to. A major disadvantage in green
walls is their aerial roots penetrate small cracks and as they grow and expand it jeopar-
dises the structural integrity of a building. Therefore, plants can alter the mortar quality
and do permanent damage to the masonry wall. Further tests would be required before
an exact gure can be placed on the value of this technique.
7. Conclusions
Masonry is classied as a brittle material with a fragile behaviour, in particular when
subjected to horizontal forces, like those induced by earthquakes. Masonry structures
are heavy and brittle, and during earthquakes, they may attract large inertia forces that
lead to the collapse of the adobe constructions. Several masonry seismic retrotting
methods studied by different researchers showed to be efcient, as observed in their test
results.
In recent years, several researches work on mesh type retrotting for masonry struc-
tures to improve the seismic behaviour of masonry constructions. The main objective of
mesh retrotting is to hold the masonry components into a single unit and to prevent
the collapse of masonry structures. The mesh type retrotting can be made of any
16 N. Sathiparan
ductile material, including steel cage, polymer, polypropylene band, bamboo meshes
and plastic carrier bag. Although this review has assessed the feasibility of applying the
various mesh types retrotting methods in developing countries, but data collected from
varies researchers, so it is difcult to make direct comparisons regarding the structural
performance of the techniques. It is therefore recommended that further work is carried
out on the same type of test with the same materials, which can provide some sort of
structural performance comparison of the methods discussed in this review. So, the
selection of a mesh for use in the retrotting of the adobe wall was challenging based
on the studies examined during the state-of-the art review of the meshes available in the
market and used in interventions in other constructions and on general considerations.
Generally, when selecting the particular mesh type, in addition to structural
performance, following characteristics should be considered (Figueiredo, Varum, Costa,
Silveira, & Oliveira, 2013):
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
As mentioned earlier, the mesh type material was considered for retrotting of
masonry houses because they are affordable and notably improve the structure seismic
behaviour. But even these methods are technically attractive retrotting method, if peo-
ples disaster imagination capability is poor, retrot of weaker houses cannot be popular.
So, we should pay much attention to increase disaster imagination of the people to
understand the importance of seismic retrot of weaker houses that is the main cause of
casualty and to create some social systems by which house owners are encouraged to
retrot their own weaker houses by themselves.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr. Ramesh Guragain and Mr. Amod Dixit, National Society for
Earthquake Technology (NSET) - Nepal, for providing the data to prepare Figure 5 and Figure 6.
References
Arya, A. S., Boen, T., & Ishiyama, Y. (2012). Guidelines for earthquake resistant non-engineered
construction. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE), United
Nations Educational, Scientic and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and International
Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IISEE).
Bischof, P., & Suter, R. (2014). Retrotting masonry walls with carbon mesh. Polymers, 6,
280299.
Blondet, M., Torrealva, D., Vargas, J., Velasquez, J., & Tarque, N. (2006). Seismic reinforcement
of adobe houses using external polymer mesh. Proceedings of 1st European Conference on
Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland.
Blondet, M., Villa Garcia, G., Brzev, S., & Rubios, A. (2011). Earthquake-resistant construction
of adobe buildings: A tutorial (2nd ed., M. Greene, Ed.). Oakland, CA: Earthquake
Engineering Research Institute.
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 17
Bothara, J., & Brzev, S. (2011). A tutorial: Improving the seismic performance of stone masonry
buildings. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Coburn, A., & Spence, R. (2002). Earthquake protection (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Disaster Mitigation and Management Centre (DMMC), Temasek Foundation & Nanyang
Technological University. (2012). A report on seismic retrotting of lifeline structures in
Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand: Uttarakhand Secretariat.
Dixit, A. M. (2004). Promoting safer building construction in Nepal. Proceedings of 13th World
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
Dixit, A. M. (2007). Mini workshop on school safety for DRH-Asia Contents Development.
Proceedings of SESP: Effect towards making schools safer against hazards in Nepal, Kobe,
Japan.
Ehsani, M. R., Saadatmanesh, H., & Velazquez-Dimas, J. I. (1999). Behavior of retrotted URM
walls under simulated earthquake loading. Journal of Composites for Construction, 3,
134142.
ElGawady, M, A., Lestuzzi, P., & Badoux, M. (2006). A seismic retrotting of unreinforced
masonry walls using FRP. Composites: Part B, 37, 148162.
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
Meguro, K., Mayorca, P., Sathiparan, N., Guragain, R., & Nesheli, N. (2005). Shaking table tests
of 1/4 scaled masonry models retrotted with PP-band meshes. Proceedings of 4th Interna-
tional Symposium on New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia, Singapore.
Meguro, K., Soti, R., Sathiparan, N., & Numada, M. (2012). Dynamic testing of masonry houses
retrotting by bamboo band meshes. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers (Structural
Engineering & Earthquake Engineering), 68, 760765.
National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET). (2009). Improving structural strength
under seismic loading of non-engineering buildings in the Himalayan Region. Kathmandu:
Author.
Nesheli, K., Sathiparan, N., Guragain, R., Mayorca, P., Ito, F., Kagawa, H., Meguro, K.
(2006). Full scale shaking table tests on masonry buildings retrotted by PP-band meshes.
Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on New Technologies for Urban Safety of
Megacities in Asia, Phuket, Thailand.
Nissanka, N. A. A. C., & Priyankara, R. L. S. (2014). Green wall technology for strengthening
masonry structures in low seismic region (Undergradute thesis). University of Ruhuna, Galle,
Srilanka.
Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 18:14 05 March 2015
Numada, M., Watanabe, M., Kuroda, M., & Meguro, K. (2013). Application of PP-band mesh
technology to retrot the masonry structure Case study of the building of orphanage in
Indonesia. Seisan Kenkyu, 65, 441446.
Pandey, B. (2002). Numerical simulation of masonry wall failure behaviour using applied element
method (Master thesis). University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Paudel, S. K. (2010). Bamboo as a green building material. Proceedings of 7th International
Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering (7CUEE) and 5th International Conference on
Earthquake Engineering (5ICEE), Tokyo, Japan.
Perini, K., Ottel, M., Fraaij, A. L. A., Haas, E. M., & Raiteri, R. (2011). Vertical greening
systems and the effect on air ow and temperature on the building envelope. Building and
Environment, 46, 22872294.
Rajendra, D., & Rupal, D. (2009). Trainers guide for training in hazards resistant construction.
Ahmedabad: National Centre for Peoples Action in Disaster Preparedness (NCPDP).
Rodriguez, J., Vos, F., Below, R., & Guha-Sapir, D. (2009). Annual Disaster Statistical Review
2008: The numbers and trends. Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of
Disasters (CRED).
San Bartolome, A., Quiun, D., & Zegarra, L. (2008). Performance of reinforced adobe houses in
Pisco, Peru Earthquake. Proceedings of 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,
Beijing, China.
Sathiparan, N., Mayorca, P., & Meguro, K. (2008). Parametric study on diagonal shear and out-
of-plane behavior of masonry wallettes retrotted by PP-band mesh. Proceedings of 14th
World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
Sathiparan, N., Mayorca, P., & Meguro, K. (2012). Shake table tests on one-quarter scale models
of masonry houses retrotted with PP-band mesh. Earthquake Spectra, 28, 277299.
Sathiparan, N., Mayorca, P., Nesheli, K., Ramesh, G., & Meguro, K. (2005). Experimental study
on in-plane and out-of-plane behavior of masonry wallettes retrotted by PP-band meshes.
Seisan Kenkyu, 57, 530533.
Sathiparan, N., & Meguro, K. (2013). Shear and exural bending strength of masonry wall
retrotted using PP-band mesh. Constructii, 14, 312.
Sathiparan, N., Sakurai, K., Numada, M., & Meguro, K. (2013). Experimental investigation on
the seismic performance of PP-band strengthening stone masonry houses. Bulletin of
Earthquake Engineering, 11, 21772196.
Sathiparan, N., Sakurai, K., Numada, M., & Meguro, K. (2014). Seismic evaluation of earthquake
resistance and retrotting measures for two story masonry houses. Bulletin of Earthquake
Engineering, 12, 18051826.
Scheuren, J. M., Le Polain de Waroux, O., Below, R., Guha-Sapir, D., & Ponserre, S. (2008).
Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2007: The numbers and trends. Brussels: Centre for
Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED).
Shrestha, H., Pradhan, S., & Guragain R. (2012). Experiences on retrotting of low strength
masonry buildings by different retrotting techniques in Nepal. 15th World Conference on
Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 19
Vos, F., Rodriguez, J., Below, R., & Guha-Sapir, D. (2010). Annual Disaster Statistical Review
2009: The numbers and trends. Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of
Disasters (CRED).