Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
FPI Rules
5 5B-1-1/3 Column-Stabilized Installations, Definitions 1525a
(New PRC)
Replaces Topside Deck Structure by
Integrated Deck, Column Top Frame, and
Non-integrated Deck.
Prepared Approved
by: Date: 2-Feb-2017 by: Date
Charles Dunlap
Director
Classification Reqts
& Standards
i
Item # PARAGRAPH DESCRIPTION Page References
No.
6 5B-1-2/5 Column-Stabilized Installations, Engineering 1526a
Analysis of the Installations Primary Structure
(New PRC)
Replaces Topside Deck Structure by
Integrated Deck, Column Top Frame, and
Non-integrated Deck.
Corrigenda
OSV Rules
7 3-5-1 Allowable Stress. 842
(Replace existing PRC with revision)
11.1.1(c) was corrected to be the same as
11.1.2(d)
8 5-3-4/7.11 & 7.15 Welded Fabrication 988
(Replace existing PRC with revision)
Welding consumables are to be type-approved
Prepared Approved
by: Date: 2-Feb-2017 by: Date
Charles Dunlap
Director
Classification Reqts
& Standards
ii
Item # PARAGRAPH DESCRIPTION Page References
No.
High-Speed Craft Rules
9 3-5-1 Allowable Stress. 1079
(Replace existing PRC with revision)
11.3.1(c) was corrected to be the same as
11.3.2(d)
Prepared Approved
by: Date: 2-Feb-2017 by: Date
Charles Dunlap
Director
Classification Reqts
& Standards
iii
PREPARATION DATE: 24 September 2016
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
7 Portlights
7.5 Construction
Reason:
The requirements of hinged deadlights for this section are edited to be in line with ICLL Reg 23(4)
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
Proposed Change:
Reason:
To align ABS rules with IACS and to further align ABS rules with the IGF Code and industry standards.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
IACS UR Zxx The reference is so new it has not been given a number yet.
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
Proposed Change:
Reason:
To align ABS rules with IACS and to further align ABS rules with the IGF Code and industry standards.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
IACS UR Zxx The reference is so new it has not been given a number yet.
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
Proposed Change:
To align ABS rules with IACS and to further align ABS rules with the IGF Code and industry standards
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
IACS UR Zxx The reference is so new it has not been given a number yet.
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION
INSTALLATIONS 2017
Proposed Change:
3 Definitions (2018)
A column stabilized floating production installation consists of a main deck connected to the
underwater hull or footings by columns or caissons. The deck is noted in these Rules as Topside
Deck Structure.
A column stabilized floating production installation consists of hull, topside deck and position
mooring system. The hull may consist of pontoons, columns and bracing members. The tops of the
columns are connected to a column top frame or a topside deck forming the global strength of the hull.
For the hull with a column top frame, the topside deck is not integrated as part of the global strength
of the hull. The topside deck is noted as Non-integrated Deck in these Rules. The topside deck
integrated with the hull to form the global strength of the hull is noted as Integrated Deck in these
Rules.
The installation depends upon the buoyancy of columns or caissons for flotation and stability. Lower
hulls or footings are normally provided at the bottom of the columns for additional buoyancy and the
most common arrangements are either twin pontoons connected by braces or a ring (continuous)
pontoon. The topside deck structure can be of an enclosed hull type or an open space truss frame
construction. The topside deck structure is interconnected with the stability columns of the hull to
form the installations overall strength.
Reason:
Topside Deck Structure is not an accurate definition, and are not consistent through Section 5B-1-2/5.
Because the definition of Topside Deck Structure is vague, criteria in Table 2 and Table 3 in 5B-1-2/5.1
are confusing and misleading.
The proposed definitions are consistent with 5B-2-1/3 for TLPs, which have similar hull configurations.
In this section and Section 5B-1-2/5, Topside Deck Structure will be replaced by Integrated Deck,
Column Top Frame, and Non-integrated Deck as applicable.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
N/A
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING FLOATING PRODUCTION
INSTALLATIONS 2017
Proposed Change:
5.1.2(a) Critical Responses for Global Strength. The global strength of the installation is to
be designed for withstanding the maximum global effects (noted in these Rules as critical
responses) induced by the loads specified in 5B-1-1/5.1. The critical responses that control
the installation strength design are prying/squeezing loads, deck inertia loads, torsional
moments, and longitudinal shear forces between pontoons. The critical responses that control
the topside deck structure integrated deck and top column frame strength design are the deck
inertia loads. As indicated in 5B-1-2/Table 1, the in-place intact strength is to be designed for
these critical responses with a return period of 100 years in the Design Environmental
Condition (DEC).
The highest wave may not always produce the most critical responses. So that the most
critical responses are captured, a sufficient number of design cases are to be used, considering
the following permutations:
i) Variation in environmental conditions and headings
ii) Variation in variables (deck payloads)
iii) Variation in ballasting distributions
iv) Variation in riser arrangements
5.1.3 Major Joint Analysis Analysis for Main Intersections of Primary Structures
Since it is difficult to adequately capture the details of the main intersections in the global
strength model, local FEM analyses are to be used, as required, to design these areas. These main
intersections include connections of pontoon to pontoon, column to pontoon, and column to
topside deck structure. For twin-pontoon column stabilized installations, special attention
should be given to brace connections to braces, columns, pontoons, and topside deck structure.
5.1.4 Fatigue Analysis
Fatigue analysis is to be performed to verify adequate strength against fatigue failure within
its design life. The fatigue analysis is to consider the loading history of the column-stabilized
installation including transport and in-place conditions. Special attention is to be given to the
major joints mentioned above. Attention is also to be given to the designs of structural
notches, cutouts, brackets, toes, and abrupt changes of structural sections where they are
prone to fatigue damages.
5.1.5 Structural Redundancy Analysis
The hull structural redundancy analysis is required to verify that there is adequate
redistribution of stress in the damaged condition defined in 5B-1-2/Table 1. The damaged
conditions are to consider loss of one compartment buoyancy and loss of one brace for twin-
pontoon column stabilized installations.
TABLE 2
Safety Factors for Fatigue Life of Hull, Integrated Deck,
and Column Top Frame (1 July 2009)
Importance Inspectable and Field Repairable
Yes No
Non-critical 3 5
Critical 5 10
Note: Critical implies that failure of these structural items would
result in the rapid loss of structural integrity and produce an
event of unacceptable consequence.
For topside deck structure, ABS Offshore S-N curves and AWS S-N curves can be used.
5B-1-2/Table 3 provides general safety factor requirements for fatigue life.
Reason:
The proposed Rule Sections clarify the difference between Integrated Deck with Column Top Frame and
Non-integrated Deck. They have different loading conditions and different acceptance criteria. Proposed
changes are consistent with 5B-2-3/5 for TLP.
Section 5.3 is added to address design requirements for non-integrated deck, which doesnt contribute global
strength.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
8 Windows (2018)
8.1 Location
Windows are defined as being rectangular, round, or oval openings with an area exceeding 0.16 m2.
A window fitted in an external door is to be treated the same as a window in the adjacent bulkhead.
Windows in side bulkheads set inboard from the side shell in the second tier that protect direct access
below to spaces listed in 3-2-17/7.5.1, are to be provided with either hinged inside deadlights or, where
they are accessible, permanently attached external storm covers of approved design and substantial
construction capable of being closed and secured weathertight.
Cabin bulkheads and doors may be accepted in place of deadlights or storm covers in the second tier
and above provided they separate side scuttles and windows from a direct access leading below or to
the second tier considered buoyant in the stability calculations.
8.5 Construction
Window frames are to be metal or other approved material and secured to the adjacent structure.
Window cutouts are to have a suitable radius at all corners and the glazing is to be set into the frames
in an appropriate, flexible seawater and sunlight resistant packing or compound. Special attention is to
be paid to the windows installed in angled deckhouse fronts.
The thickness of the thermally toughened monolithic safety glass is to be not less than the greater of
the following:
The above requirements are for thermally toughened monolithic glass, which is to comply with ISO
21005 or an equivalent national standard. Alternatively, glazing with a flexural strength of not less than
160 N/mm2 (23206 psi) approved by recognized standard is also acceptable.
Windows of glazing other than thermally toughened monolithic glass will be specially considered with
regards to design, manufacture, and testing.
Reason:
There is no Rule requirement for windows in SVR. The added window requirement will be helpful for design,
construction, and survey.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
A2
F.P.
h
3
h
2
h1
B/8
h3
Notional
h2 deck line
h1
Upper deck
5 Tests
Tests are to be in accordance with the requirements of Part 2, Chapter 2 for the respective sizes of
anchors and chains. See Section 2-2-1 and Section 2-2-2.
A/EN Ratio
Increase
SI Units number of
MKS Units U.S. Units hawsers by
Above 0.9 up to 1.1 above 9.7 up to 11.8 1
Above 1.1 up to 1.2 above 11.8 up to 12.9 2
above 1.2 above 12.9 3
where
A = defined in 3-5-1/3
EN = determined by the equation in 3-5-1/3
9.3 Mooring Lines
The mooring lines for vessels with Equipment Number EN of less than or equal to 2000 are given in 3-
5-1/9.3.1. For other vessels, the mooring lines are given in 3-5-1/9.3.2.
The Equipment Number EN is to be calculated in compliance with 3-5-1/3. Deck cargo as given by the
loading manual should be included for the determination of side-projected area A.
9.3.2(a) Minimum Breaking Strength. The minimum breaking strength, in kN (kgf, lbf), of the
mooring lines should be taken as:
MBL = 0.1 A1 + 350 kN
MBL = 10.20 A1 + 35690 kgf
MBL = 2.089 A1 + 78680 lbf
The minimum breaking strength may be limited to 1275 kN (130,000 kgf, 286,600 lbf).
However, in this case the moorings are to be considered as not sufficient for environmental
conditions given by 3-5-1/9.3.2. For these vessels, the acceptable wind speed vw*, in m/s, can
be estimated as follows:
where vw is the wind speed as per 3-5-1/9.3.2, MBL* the breaking strength of the
mooring lines intended to be supplied and MBL the breaking strength according to the
above formula. However, the minimum breaking strength should not be taken less than
corresponding to an acceptable wind speed of 21 m/s (68.9ft/s):
2
21
MBL MBL
*
for vw in m/s
vw
2
68.9
MBL* MBL for vw in ft/s
vw
9.3.2(b) Number of Mooring Lines. The total number of head, stern, and breast lines (see Note
in 3-5-1/9.3.2) should be taken as:
n = 8.310-4 A1 + 6 for A1 in m2
n = 7.7110-5 A1 + 6 for A1 in ft2
For oil tankers, chemical tankers, bulk carriers, and ore carriers the total number of head, stern,
and breast lines should be taken as:
n = 8.310-4 A1 + 4 for A1 in m2
n = 7.7110-5 A1 + 4 for A1 in ft2
The total number of head, stern, and breast lines should be rounded to the nearest whole number.
The number of head, stern, and breast lines may be increased or decreased in conjunction with
an adjustment to the strength of the lines. The adjusted strength, MBL*, should be taken as:
MBL* = 1.2 MBL n/n* MBL for increased number of lines,
MBL* = MBL n/n* for reduced number of lines.
where n* is the increased or decreased total number of head, stern and breast lines
and n the number of lines for the considered vessel type as calculated by the above
formulas without rounding.
Similarly, the strength of head, stern, and breast lines may be increased or decreased in
conjunction with an adjustment to the number of lines.
The total number of spring lines (see Note in 3-5-1/9.3.2) is not to be taken as less than:
Two lines, where EN < 5000,
Four lines, where EN 5000.
The strength of spring lines is to be the same as that of the head, stern, and breast lines. If the
number of head, stern, and breast lines is increased in conjunction with an adjustment to the
strength of the lines, the number of spring lines is to be likewise increased, but rounded up to
the nearest even number.
9.3.3 Length of Mooring Lines
The length of mooring lines for vessels with EN of less than or equal to 2000 may be taken
from 3-5-1/Table 2. For vessels with EN > 2000 the length of mooring lines may be taken as
200 m.
The lengths of individual mooring lines may be reduced by up to 7% of the above given lengths,
but the total length of mooring lines should not be less than would have resulted had all lines
been of equal length.
9.5 Tow line
The tow lines are given in 3-5-1/Table 3 and are intended as a vessels own tow line of a vessel being
towed by a tug or other vessel. For the selection of the tow line from 3-5-1/Table 3, the Equipment
Number (EN) is to be taken according to 3-5-1/3.
Notwithstanding the requirements given in 3-5-1/9.3 and 3-5-1/9.5, no fiber rope is to be less than 20
mm (0.79 in) in diameter. For polyamide ropes, the minimum breaking strength is to be increased by
20% and for other synthetic ropes by 10% to account for strength loss due to, among others, aging and
wear.
Offset
Towing chock
As far as practicable, warping drums are to be positioned not more than 20 m (65.6 ft) away
from the chock, measured along the path of the line.
Attention is to be given to the arrangement of the equipment for towing and mooring operations
in order to prevent interference of mooring and towing lines as far as practicable. It is beneficial
to provide dedicated towing arrangements separate from the mooring equipment.
For emergency towing arrangements for tankers reference is be made to 3-5-1/15.9. For all
vessels other than tankers it is recommended to provide towing arrangements fore and aft of
sufficient strength for other towing service as defined in 3-2-7/4.3.2.
where:
= coefficient of friction (0.5)
M = mass of windlass, in tonnes (Ltons)
g = gravity: 9.81 m/sec2 (32.2 ft/sec2)
N = number of groups of bolts
The axial tensile/compressive and lateral forces from the above equations are also to
be considered in the design of the supporting structure.
11.3.2(c) Stresses in Bolts. Tensile axial stresses in the individual bolts in each group of bolts
i are to be calculated. The horizontal forces, Fxi and Fyi, are normally to be reacted by shear
chocks. Where fitted bolts are designed to support these shear forces in one or both directions,
the von Mises equivalent stresses in the individual fitted bolts are to be calculated and
compared to the stress under proof load. Where pourable resins are incorporated in the holding
down arrangements, due account is to be taken in the calculations.
11.3.2(d) Allowable Stress (2018)
i) Bolts. The safety factor against bolt proof strength is to be not less than 2.0.
ii) Supporting Structures. The stresses, based on gross thickness, in the above deck
framing and the hull structure supporting the windlass and chain stopper are not to
exceed the following values.
Bending Stress Normal stress 85 100% of the yield strength of the material
Shearing Stress Shear stress 60% of the yield strength of the material
11.5 Trial
See 3-7-2/1.
Py Px
h
W
Fore
Centerline of Vessel Py
Centerline of B
Windlass
Note: Px
Py to be examined from both inboard and outboard
directions separately - see 3-5-1/11.3.2(a). The
sign convention for yi is reversed when Py is from
the opposite direction as shown.
FIGURE 3
Sign Convention (2004)
y2 (+ve)
y1 (+ve)
* For intermediate values of equipment number, use equipment complement in sizes and weights given for the lower equipment
number in the table.
* For intermediate values of equipment number, use equipment complement in sizes and weights given for the lower equipment
number in the table.
* For intermediate values of equipment number, use equipment complement in sizes and weights given for the lower equipment
number in the table.
* For intermediate values of equipment number, use equipment complement in sizes and weights given for the lower equipment
number in the table.
* 3-5-1/9.2.3 is to be observed
Due to concerns raised by the industry in view of an increasing number of incidents, such as anchor losses,
IACS decided to review and update UR A1 Anchoring Equipment and Recommendation No. 10
Anchoring, Mooring, and Towing Equipment. Operational practices being adopted by many owners, in
particular, anchoring in unsheltered waters, have been considered for the review of the existing criteria for
anchoring to reflect current practice.
Furthermore, due to recurrent incidents during mooring and towing, IACS also decided to review and update
Recommendation No. 10 and Unified Requirement A2 Shipboard fittings and supporting hull structures
associated with towing and mooring on conventional ships. Extensive investigations indicated that the
minimum recommended number and strength of mooring lines, in particular, for larger vessels is insufficient.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
TABLE 2 (ABS)
Requirements for Design Temperatures Below 0C (32F)
and Down to -55C (-67F) (2016) (2018)
Note: Supplementary to 5C-8-6/Table 2
Tension Test
Tensile Strength 400 490 N/mm2 440 590 N/mm2 490 620 N/mm2
(41 50 kgf/mm2, (45 60 kgf/mm2, (50 63 kgf/mm2,
58,000 71,000 psi) 64000 - 85000 psi) 71,000 90,000 psi)
Yield Strength (2) Min. 235 N/mm2 315 N/mm2 355 N/mm2
(24 kgf/mm2, 34,000 psi) (32 kgf/mm2, 46000 psi) (36 kgf/mm2, 51,000 psi)
Elongation (%) in
200 mm (8 in.) or 21 20 19
50 mm (2 in.) or 24 23 22
5.65 A 22 21 20
A = Cross Sectional area of Specimen in mm2 (in2)
Marking (see 2-1-4/9 and Note 2) AB/V-OXX AB/VH32-OXX AB/VH-OXX
Impact Test (Charpy V-notch)
Frequency: Plates See 5C-8-6/Table 2 Sections each 15 tons of each heat
Heat Treatment: See 5C-8-6/Table 2 and Note 1 for 5C-8-6/Table 2 (ABS)
Notes:
1 Control Rolled (for sections only) or Thermo-Mechanical Controlled Process may also be considered as an
alternative to normalizing or quenching and tempering.
2 (2018) For materials which exhibit a definite yield point exceeding 80% of the tensile strength, a letter Y is
to be added at the end of the marking thus AB/V-OXXY or AB/VH32-OXXY or ABVH-OXXY.
Reason:
Notes under table 2 updated to include marking for the new strength level.
Notes under table 4 updated to remove note 9. ABS does not want to rule out the impact testing requirement
for austenitic stainless steels, in certain cases.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
SVR for Liquefied Gas Carriers with Membrane Tanks does not consider the effect of partial girder effect
while fully extended horizontal stringer considers partial stringer as load sharing members. Accordingly, other
alternative approach such as grillage analysis or finite element analysis could be accepted.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
N/A
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
SVR for Liquefied Gas Carriers with Membrane Tanks does not consider the effect of partial girder effect while
fully extended horizontal stringer considers partial stringer as load sharing members. Accordingly, other
alternative approach such as grillage analysis or finite element analysis could be accepted.
Permissible shear stress of deck girder is not consistent with other main supporting member such as double
bottom girder/floors (SVR 5C-12-4/7.7), deck transverse (SVR 5C-12-4/11.3), side transverse (SVR 5C-12-
4/11.7), side stringers (SVR 5C-12-4/11.9), vertical webs (SVR 5C-12-4/15.3), horizontal webs (SVR 5C-12-
4/15.5).
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
N/A
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
The heel line may be used to check the misalignment as an alternative to the median alignment shown
in Figures 1 and 2.
FIGURE 1
Median Alignment of Critical Joint
Reason:
Currently, the limiting values of misalignment tolerances for cruciform joints are not laid out in our Rules or
Guides; and IACS Recommendation 47, which is referred in our Rules, does not specify the limiting tolerance
for cruciform joints.
We have been receiving increasing number of requests from the yards to accept a misalignment tolerance value
greater than 5 mm. Since no limiting tolerance is explicitly mentioned in our Rules, yards insist on accepting a
higher tolerance and it becomes difficult to explain to the yard that this requirement is based on our internal
work instructions which is to be met with, for AB-CM notation.
Since we have an Appendix for AB-CM notation, it is suggested to include the tolerance limits so that the
clients have clear understanding of the requirements.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING OFFSHORE SUPPORT
VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
A2
F.P.
h
3
h
2
h1
B/8
h3
Notional
h2 deck line
h1
Upper deck
5 Tests
Tests are to be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 2 of the ABS Rules for Materials and
Welding (Part 2) for the respective sizes of anchors and chains. See Sections 2-2-1 and 2-2-2.
A/EN Ratio
Increase
SI Units number of
MKS Units U.S. Units hawsers by
Above 0.9 up to 1.1 above 9.7 up to 11.8 1
Above 1.1 up to 1.2 above 11.8 up to 12.9 2
above 1.2 above 12.9 3
where
A = defined in 3-5-1/3
EN = determined by the equation in 3-5-1/3
9.3 Mooring Lines
The mooring lines for vessels with Equipment Number EN of less than or equal to 2000 are given in 3-
5-1/9.3.1. For other vessels, the mooring lines are given in 3-5-1/9.3.2.
The Equipment Number EN is to be calculated in compliance with 3-5-1/3. Deck cargo as given by the
loading manual should be included for the determination of side-projected area A.
9.3.2(a) Minimum Breaking Strength. The minimum breaking strength, in kN (kgf, lbf), of the
mooring lines should be taken as:
MBL = 0.1 A1 + 350 kN
MBL = 10.20 A1 + 35690 kgf
MBL = 2.089 A1 + 78680 lbf
The minimum breaking strength may be limited to 1275 kN (130,000 kgf, 286,600 lbf).
However, in this case the moorings are to be considered as not sufficient for environmental
conditions given by 3-5-1/9.3.2. For these vessels, the acceptable wind speed vw*, in m/s, can
be estimated as follows:
where vw is the wind speed as per 3-5-1/9.3.2, MBL* the breaking strength of the
mooring lines intended to be supplied and MBL the breaking strength according to the
above formula. However, the minimum breaking strength should not be taken less than
corresponding to an acceptable wind speed of 21 m/s (68.9ft/s):
2
21
MBL MBL
*
for vw in m/s
vw
2
68.9
MBL* MBL for vw in ft/s
vw
vw
9.3.2(b) Number of Mooring Lines. The total number of head, stern, and breast lines (see Note
in 3-5-1/9.3.2) should be taken as:
n = 8.310-4 A1 + 6 for A1 in m2
n = 7.7110-5 A1 + 6 for A1 in ft2
For oil tankers, chemical tankers, bulk carriers, and ore carriers the total number of head, stern,
and breast lines should be taken as:
n = 8.310-4 A1 + 4 for A1 in m2
n = 7.7110-5 A1 + 4 for A1 in ft2
The total number of head, stern, and breast lines should be rounded to the nearest whole number.
The number of head, stern, and breast lines may be increased or decreased in conjunction with
an adjustment to the strength of the lines. The adjusted strength, MBL*, should be taken as:
MBL* = 1.2 MBL n/n* MBL for increased number of lines,
MBL* = MBL n/n* for reduced number of lines.
where n* is the increased or decreased total number of head, stern and breast lines
and n the number of lines for the considered vessel type as calculated by the above
formulas without rounding.
Similarly, the strength of head, stern, and breast lines may be increased or decreased in
conjunction with an adjustment to the number of lines.
The total number of spring lines (see Note in 3-5-1/9.3.2) is not to be taken as less than:
Two lines, where EN < 5000,
Four lines, where EN 5000.
The strength of spring lines is to be the same as that of the head, stern, and breast lines. If the
number of head, stern, and breast lines is increased in conjunction with an adjustment to the
strength of the lines, the number of spring lines is to be likewise increased, but rounded up to
the nearest even number.
9.3.3 Length of Mooring Lines
The length of mooring lines for vessels with EN of less than or equal to 2000 may be taken
from 3-5-1/Table 2. For vessels with EN > 2000 the length of mooring lines may be taken as
200 m.
The lengths of individual mooring lines may be reduced by up to 7% of the above given lengths,
but the total length of mooring lines should not be less than would have resulted had all lines
been of equal length.
9.5 Tow line
The tow lines are given in 3-5-1/Table 3 and are intended as a vessels own tow line of a vessel being
towed by a tug or other vessel. For the selection of the tow line from 3-5-1/Table 3, the Equipment
Number (EN) is to be taken according to 3-5-1/3.
Notwithstanding the requirements given in 3-5-1/9.3 and 3-5-1/9.5, no fiber rope is to be less than 20
mm (0.79 in) in diameter. For polyamide ropes, the minimum breaking strength is to be increased by
20% and for other synthetic ropes by 10% to account for strength loss due to, among others, aging and
wear.
Offset
Towing chock
As far as practicable, warping drums are to be positioned not more than 20 m (65.6 ft) away
from the chock, measured along the path of the line.
Attention is to be given to the arrangement of the equipment for towing and mooring operations
in order to prevent interference of mooring and towing lines as far as practicable. It is beneficial
to provide dedicated towing arrangements separate from the mooring equipment.
For emergency towing arrangements for tankers reference is be made to 3-5-1/15.9. For all
vessels other than tankers it is recommended to provide towing arrangements fore and aft of
sufficient strength for other towing service as defined in 3-2-7/4.3.2.
FIGURE 2
Direction of Forces and Weight (2004)
Py Px
h
W
Fore
Centerline of Vessel Py
Centerline of B
Windlass
Note: Px
Py to be examined from both inboard and outboard
directions separately - see 3-5-1/11.3.2(a). The
sign convention for yi is reversed when Py is from
the opposite direction as shown.
y2 (+ve)
y1 (+ve)
13 12 Hawse Pipes
Hawse pipes are to have full rounded flanges and the least possible lead, in order to minimize the nip
on the cables. They are to be attached to thick insert plates by continuous welds the size of which are to
be in accordance with Section 3-2-19 for the plating thickness and type of joint selected. They are to be
hose tested in position for water-tightness with the water pressure of not less than 2.0 bar (2.0 kgf/cm2,
30 psi). Hawse pipes for stockless anchors are to provide enough clearances to preclude the anchor
jamming. The anchors are to be let go aweigh and heaved up to the satisfaction of the Surveyor, proving
the smooth setting, flukes adherence to the pocket surface and no jamming occurrence. Care is to be
taken to ensure a fair lead for the chain from the windlass to the hawse pipes and down to the chain pipes
of the chain lockers.
TABLE 1 (continued)
Equipment for Self-propelled Ocean-going Vessels (2018)
US Units
Stockless Bower Anchors Chain Cable Stud Link Bower Chain
Diameter
Normal- High- Extra High-
Mass per Strength Steel Strength Steel Strength Steel
Equipment Equipment Anchor, Length, (Grade 1), (Grade 2), (Grade 3),
Numeral Number* Number pounds fathoms inches inches inches
U41 3210 32 21800 360 3 15/16 3 7/16 3 1/16
U42 3400 32 23100 360 4 3 /16
9 3 1/16
U43 3600 32 24500 375 4 /8
1 3 /8
5 3 3/16
U44 3800 32 25800 375 4 /4
1 3 /4
3 3 5/16
U45 4000 32 27100 375 4 /8
3 3 /8
7 3 7/16
* For intermediate values of equipment number, use equipment complement in sizes and weights given for the lower equipment
number in the table.
* 3-5-1/9.2.3 is to be observed
Due to concerns raised by the industry in view of an increasing number of incidents, such as anchor losses,
IACS decided to review and update UR A1 Anchoring Equipment and Recommendation No. 10
Anchoring, Mooring, and Towing Equipment. Operational practices being adopted by many owners, in
particular, anchoring in unsheltered waters, have been considered for the review of the existing criteria for
anchoring to reflect current practice.
Furthermore, due to recurrent incidents during mooring and towing, IACS also decided to review and update
Recommendation No. 10 and Unified Requirement A2 Shipboard fittings and supporting hull structures
associated with towing and mooring on conventional ships. Extensive investigations indicated that the
minimum recommended number and strength of mooring lines, in particular, for larger vessels is insufficient.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING OFFSHORE SUPPORT
VESSELS 2017
Proposed Change:
7.15.1 Materials
i) Materials entered into the construction of torque-transmitting and load-bearing parts
of anchor handling/towing winches are to comply with material specifications in either
Chapter 3 of the ABS Rules for Materials and Welding (Part 2) or a recognized
material standard.
ii) Shark jaw and towing pins with attachment shall be made of rolled, forged, or cast
steel in accordance with Chapter 3 of the ABS Rules for Materials and Welding (Part
2).
iii) Stern roller, bollards, and other deck fittings are to comply with material specifications
in Chapter 1 of the ABS Rules for Materials and Welding (Part 2). Where they are
made in accordance with recognized standards (e.g., ISO 13795), the material shall
meet the related requirements in the applicable recognized standard.
iv) The proposed materials are to be indicated in the construction plans and are to be
approved in connection with the design. All such materials are to be certified by the
material manufacturers approved by ABS and are to be traceable to the manufacturers
certificates; otherwise, material tests need to be witnessed by Surveyor.
Added 2 new subsections for deck fitting design as well as materials and welded fabrication requirements for
anchor handling and/or towing equipment and components.
Changed original subsection number 7.11 to 7.13 to accommodate the new order of subsection.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING HIGH-SPEED CRAFT 2017
Proposed Change:
3 Calculation of EN
3.1 Monohulls (2018)
The basic Equipment Number (EN) is to be obtained from the following equation for use in determining
required equipment.
EN = k2/3 + m(Ba + bh) + nA
where
k = 1.0 (1.0, 1.012)
m = 2 (2, 0.186)
n = 0.1 (0.1, 0.00929)
= molded displacement, in metric tons (long tons), at the summer load waterline.
B = molded breadth, as defined in 3-1-1/5, in m (ft)
A2
F.P.
...
15 14 Hawse Pipes
Hawse pipes are to be of ample size and strength; they are to have full rounded flanges and the least
possible lead, in order to minimize the nip on the cables; they are to be securely attached to thick
doubling or insert plates by continuous welds the size of which are to be in accordance with Section 3-2-13
for the plating thickness and type of joint selected. When in position they are to be thoroughly tested for
watertightness by means of a hose in which the water pressure is not to be less than 2.06 bar (2.1 kgf/cm2,
30 psi). Hawse pipes for stockless anchors are to provide ample clearances; the anchors are to be shipped
and unshipped so that the Surveyor may be satisfied that there is no risk of the anchor jamming in the
hawse pipe. Care is to be taken to ensure a fair lead for the chain from the windlass to the hawse pipes
and to the chain pipes.
where
A = defined in 3-5-1/3
EN = determined by the equation in 3-5-1/3
The Equipment Number EN is to be calculated in compliance with 3-5-1/3. Deck cargo as given by the
loading manual is to be included for the determination of side-projected area A.
A/EN Ratio
Increase
SI Units number of
MKS Units U.S. Units hawsers by
Above 0.9 up to 1.1 above 9.7 up to 11.8 1
Above 1.1 up to 1.2 above 11.8 up to 12.9 2
above 1.2 above 12.9 3
17.2.2(a) Minimum Breaking Strength. The minimum breaking strength, in kN (kgf, lbf), of
the mooring lines should be taken as:
MBL = 0.1 A1 + 350 kN
MBL = 10.20 A1 + 35690 kgf
MBL = 2.089 A1 + 78680 lbf
The minimum breaking strength may be limited to 1275 kN (130,000 kgf, 286,600 lbf).
However, in this case the moorings are to be considered as not sufficient for environmental
conditions given by 3-5-1/17.3.2. For these craft, the acceptable wind speed vw*can be
estimated as follows:
where vw is the wind speed as per 3-5-1/17.3.2, MBL* the breaking strength of the
mooring lines intended to be supplied and MBL the breaking strength according to the
above formula. However, the minimum breaking strength should not be taken less than
corresponding to an acceptable wind speed of 21 m/s (68.9ft/s):
2
21
MBL MBL
*
for vw in m/s
vw
2
68.9
MBL* MBL for vw in ft/s
vw
If lines are intended to be supplied for an acceptable wind speed vw* higher than vw as per 3-5-
1/17.3.2, the minimum breaking strength should be taken as:
2
v
MBL w
* MBL
vw
17.3.2(b) Number of Mooring Lines. The total number of head, stern, and breast lines (see
Note in 3-5-1/17.3.2) should be taken as:
n = 8.310-4 A1 + 6 for A1 in m2
n = 7.7110-5 A1 + 6 for A1 in ft2
For oil tankers, chemical tankers, bulk carriers, and ore carriers the total number of head, stern,
and breast lines should be taken as:
n = 8.310-4 A1 + 4 for A1 in m2
n = 7.7110-5 A1 + 4 for A1 in ft2
The total number of head, stern, and breast lines should be rounded to the nearest whole number.
Notwithstanding the requirements given in 3-5-1/17.3 and 3-5-1/17.5, no fiber rope is to be less than 20
mm (0.79 in) in diameter. For polyamide ropes, the minimum breaking strength is to be increased by
20% and for other synthetic ropes by 10% to account for strength loss due to, among others, aging and
wear.
Towing chock
US Units
Towline Wire or Rope Hawsers
Breaking Length of Breaking
Equipment Equipment Length, Strength, Each Strength,
Numeral Number* Fathoms Pounds Number Fathoms Pounds
U6 150 98 22000 3 66 12100
U7 175 98 25100 3 66 13200
U8 205 98 29100 4 66 14300
U9 240 98 33700 4 66 15400
U10 280 98 39000 4 77 16500
* 3-5-1/17.2.3 is to be observed
Due to concerns raised by the industry in view of an increasing number of incidents, such as anchor losses,
IACS decided to review and update UR A1 Anchoring Equipment and Recommendation No. 10
Anchoring, Mooring, and Towing Equipment. Operational practices being adopted by many owners, in
particular, anchoring in unsheltered waters, have been considered for the review of the existing criteria for
anchoring to reflect current practice.
Furthermore, due to recurrent incidents during mooring and towing, IACS also decided to review and update
Recommendation No. 10 and Unified Requirement A2 Shipboard fittings and supporting hull structures
associated with towing and mooring on conventional ships. Extensive investigations indicated that the
minimum recommended number and strength of mooring lines, in particular, for larger craft is insufficient
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING HIGH SPEED NAVAL
CRAFT 2017
Proposed Change:
3 Calculation of EN
3.1 Monohulls (2012) (2018)
The basic Equipment Number (EN) is to be obtained from the following equation for use in determining
required equipment.
EN = k2/3 + m(Ba + bh) + nA
where
k = 1.0 (1.0, 1.012)
m = 2 (2, 0.186)
n = 0.1 (0.1, 0.00929)
= molded displacement, in metric tons (long tons), at the summer load waterline.
B = molded breadth, as defined in 3-1-1/5, in m (ft)
a = freeboard, in m (ft), from the light waterline amidships.
A2
F.P.
...
15 14 Hawse Pipes
Hawse pipes are to be of ample size and strength; they are to have full rounded flanges and the least
possible lead, in order to minimize the nip on the cables; they are to be securely attached to thick
doubling or insert plates by continuous welds the size of which are to be in accordance with Section 3-2-13
for the plating thickness and type of joint selected. When in position they are to be thoroughly tested for
watertightness by means of a hose in which the water pressure is not to be less than 2.06 bar (2.1 kgf/cm2,
30 psi). Hawse pipes for stockless anchors are to provide ample clearances; the anchors are to be shipped
and unshipped so that the Surveyor may be satisfied that there is no risk of the anchor jamming in the
hawse pipe. Care is to be taken to provide a fair lead for the chain from the windlass to the hawse pipes
and to the chain pipes.
* 3-5-1/17.2.3 is to be observed
Due to concerns raised by the industry in view of an increasing number of incidents, such as anchor losses,
IACS decided to review and update UR A1 Anchoring Equipment and Recommendation No. 10
Anchoring, Mooring, and Towing Equipment. Operational practices being adopted by many owners, in
particular, anchoring in unsheltered waters, have been considered for the review of the existing criteria for
anchoring to reflect current practice.
Furthermore, due to recurrent incidents during mooring and towing, IACS also decided to review and update
Recommendation No. 10 and Unified Requirement A2 Shipboard fittings and supporting hull structures
associated with towing and mooring on conventional ships. Extensive investigations indicated that the
minimum recommended number and strength of mooring lines, in particular, for larger vessels is insufficient
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING BULK CARRIERS FOR
SERVICE ON GREAT LAKES 2017
Proposed Change:
t2 = 0.73s(k2p/f2)1/2 mm (in.)
t3 = 6.35 mm (0.25 in.)
where
s = stiffener spacing, in mm (in.)
k1 = 0.342
k2 = 0.500
p = nominal pressure due to gravity at the lower edge of each plate, in
N/cm2 (kgf/cm2, lbf/in2)
= k3ghc[cos2 + (1 sino)sin2]
k3 = adjustment factor to account for the Great Lakes environment
= 0.870
g = specific weight of the bulk cargo considered, in N/cm2-m (kgf/cm2-m,
lbf/in2-ft). g is not to be taken less than 1.471 N/cm2-m (0.15 kgf/cm2-
m, 0.6503 lbf/in2-ft)
= slope of wall measured from horizontal plane, in degrees
Reason:
1) When the hopper slope is not a part of a tank, it is not covered in the Great Lakes Bulk Carriers Rules 1978
(and 2017). The reason for this Proposed Rule Change (PRC) is to cover this common case and avoid the
confusion it is causing our clients by not having this area addressed in our Rules. This Proposed Rule
Change (PRC) was presented during the GREAT LAKES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING in
Chicago on 17 June 2015, and we have received positive feedback from clients for addressing this subject.
2) Since the above method for calculating pressure (p) is taken from SVR 5C-3-3/5.7.2 with a few
adjustments, when calculating required plate thickness, Sm (as outlined in SVR 5C-3-4/7.3.1) should be
used instead of Q (as outlined in the Great Lakes Bulk Carriers Rules 2-5-2)
3) When calculating required SM for stiffeners, the same adjustment factor (ka =0.870) that applies to plating
thickness, should be applied to SM. To avoid the confusion, k3 is added to the pressure (p) equation instead
of the plating thickness (t1 and t2) equations.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
PROPOSED CHANGE TO: RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING BULK CARRIERS FOR
SERVICE ON GREAT LAKES 2017
Proposed Change:
FIGURE 2
Example of Screen Bulkhead Section Modulus
Calculation Double Hulls (1 July 2017)
Screen bulkheads are non-watertight, and they might have openings in them, but they still contribute to the
transverse strength of the hull. 3-2-6/11 above was proposed last year to make sure the transverse strength
integrity of the vessel is maintained when Screen bulkheads get corroded. After discussing with ship owners
and designers at the GREAT LAKES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING - June 2016, it was brought to
our attention that in the second paragraph of the new 3-2-6/11, the required ring along the screen bulkhead
edges, that has to meet the web requirements in 3-2-5/11.1, should be reduced to the U shaped part that only
runs along the deck and side tanks for double hulls or the deck and side shell for single hulls. We concur with
the clients feedback since the screen bulkhead is only used to separate cargo, and it is not intended to support
the hopper slope, thus reducing the ring along the Screen Bulkhead edges to the U shaped part as indicated
above should be satisfactory for the intended purpose of this new Rule 3-2-6/11.
Reference (If applicable. Please submit a copy of references with this form.)
Impact Assessment (Please move the cursor to the impact category for guidance)
Substantially Minimally Neutral Minimally Substantially
Unfavorable Unfavorable Favorable Favorable
Environment
Safety
Shipyard
Owner
Vendor
Designer
1. Application
2. Special Survey
2.1 Schedule
2.2 Scope
2.2.1 General
2.2.2 Fuel Handling and Piping
2.2.3 Fuel Valves
2.2.4 Pressure Relief Valves
2.2.5 Fuel Handling Equipment
2.2.6 Electrical Equipment
2.2.7 Safety Systems
2.2.8 Fuel Storage Tanks
3. Annual Survey
3.1 Schedule
3.2 Scope
3.2.1 General
3.2.1.1 Logbooks/Records.
3.2.1.2 Operating and Maintenance Instruction Manuals.
3.2.1.3 Control, Monitoring and Safety Systems.
3.2.1.4 Fuel Handling Piping, Machinery and Equipment
3.2.1.5 Ventilating System
3.2.1.6 Drip Trays
3.2.1.7 Hazardous Areas
3.2.1.8 Electrical Bonding.
3.2.2 Fuel Storage, Bunkering and Supply Systems
3.2.2.1 Fuel Storage
3.2.2.2 Fuel Bunkering System
3.2.2.3 Fuel Supply System
4. Intermediate Survey
4.1 Schedule
4.2 Scope
4.2.1 General
4.2.1.1 Safety Systems.
Note:
1. The requirements of this UR are to be uniformly applied by IACS Societies for surveys
commenced on or after 1 January 2018.
1. Application
Z25
(cont) These requirements apply to ships, other than those covered by the UR Z16, which utilize
gas or other low flash point fuels as a fuel for propulsion prime mover/auxiliary power
generation arrangements and associated systems. These requirements are in addition to the
requirements of UR Z18.
These survey requirements do not cover fire protection, fire-fighting installation, and
personnel protection equipment.
2. Special Survey
2.1 Schedule
2.1.1 Special Surveys are to be carried out at 5 years intervals to renew the Classification
Certificate.
2.1.2 The first Special Survey is to be completed within 5 years from the date of the initial
classification survey and thereafter within 5 years from the credited date of the previous
Special Survey. However, an extension of class of 3 months maximum beyond the 5th year
can be granted in exceptional circumstances. In this case, the next period of class will start
from the expiry date of the Special Survey before the extension was granted.
2.1.3 For surveys completed within 3 months before the expiry date of the Special Survey,
the next period of class will start from the expiry date of the Special Survey. For surveys
completed more than 3 months before the expiry date of the Special Survey, the period of
class will start from the survey completion date. In cases where the vessel has been laid up
or has been out of service for a considerable period because of a major repair or modification
and the owner elects to only carry out the overdue surveys, the next period of class will start
from the expiry date of the Special Survey. If the owner elects to carry out the next due
Special Survey, the period of class will start from the survey completion date.
2.1.4 The Special Survey may be commenced at the 4th Annual Survey and be progressed
with a view to completion by the 5th anniversary date. When the Special Survey is
commenced prior to the 4th Annual Survey, the entire survey is to be completed within 15
months if such work is to be credited to the Special Survey.
2.1.5 Special Surveys may be carried out on a continuous survey basis. In this case, the
interval between consecutive examinations of each item is not to exceed five (5) years.
2.2 Scope
2.2.1 General
The Special Survey is to include, in addition to the requirements of the Annual Survey,
examination, tests and checks of sufficient extent to ensure that the fuel installations are in a
satisfactory condition and is fit for its intended purpose for the new period of class of 5 years
to be assigned, subject to proper maintenance and operation and to periodical surveys being
carried out at the due dates.
All piping for fuel storage, fuel bunkering, and fuel supply such as venting, compressing,
refrigerating, liquefying, heating storing, burning or otherwise handling the fuel and liquid
nitrogen installations are to be examined. Removal of insulation from the piping and opening
Z25 for examination may be required. Where deemed suspect, a hydrostatic test to 1.25 times the
(cont) Maximum Allowable Relief Valve Setting (MARVS) for the pipeline is to be carried out. After
reassembly, the complete piping is to be tested for leaks. Where water cannot be tolerated
and the piping cannot be dried prior to putting the system into service, the Surveyor may
accept alternative testing fluids or alternative means of testing.
All emergency shut-down valves, check valves, block and bleed valves, master gas valves,
remote operating valves, isolating valves for pressure relief valves in the fuel storage, fuel
bunkering, and fuel supply piping systems are to be examined and proven operable. A
random selection of valves is to be opened for examination.
i) Fuel Storage Tank Pressure Relief Valves. The pressure relief valves for the fuel
storage tanks are to be opened for examination, adjusted, and function tested. If the
tanks are equipped with relief valves with non-metallic membranes in the main or pilot
valves, such non-metallic membranes are to be replaced.
ii) Fuel Supply and Bunkering Piping Pressure Relief Valves. A random selection of
pressure relief valves for the fuel supply and bunkering piping are to be opened for
examination, adjusted, and function tested. Where a proper record of continuous
overhaul and retesting of individually identifiable relief valves is maintained,
consideration will be given to acceptance on the basis of opening, internal examination,
and testing of a representative sampling of valves, including each size and type of
liquefied gas or vapor relief valve in use, provided there is logbook evidence that the
remaining valves have been overhauled and tested since crediting of the previous
Special Survey.
iii) Pressure/Vacuum Relief Valves. The pressure/vacuum relief valves, rupture disc and
other pressure relief devices for interbarrier spaces and hold spaces are to be opened,
examined, tested and readjusted as necessary, depending on their design.
Fuel pumps, compressors, process pressure vessels, inert gas generators, heat exchangers
and other components used in connection with fuel handling are to be examined as required
in the Rules of each individual Society for periodical survey of machinery.
iii) Testing of systems for de-energizing electrical equipment which is not certified for use
in hazardous areas.
iv) An electrical insulation resistance test of the circuits terminating in, or passing through,
the hazardous zones and spaces is to be carried out.
i) Proper response of the fuel safety system upon fault conditions is to be verified.
Fuel storage tanks are to be examined in accordance with an approved survey plan.
Liquefied gas fuel storage tanks are to be examined based upon Recommendation No. 148.
3. Annual Survey
3.1 Schedule
3.1.1 Annual Surveys are to be held within 3 months before or after each anniversary date of
the date of the initial classification survey or of the date credited for the last Special Survey.
They will normally be performed at the same time as an Annual Hull survey.
3.2 Scope
3.2.1 General
The following is to be carried out during the survey of the Fuel Storage, Fuel Bunkering
System, and Fuel Supply System:
3.2.1.1 Logbooks/Records
The logbooks and operating records are to be examined with regard to correct functioning of
the gas detection systems, fuel supply/gas systems, etc. The hours per day of the re-
liquefaction plant, gas combustion unit, as applicable, the boil-off rate, and nitrogen
consumption (for membrane containment systems) are to be considered together with gas
detection records.
The manufacturer/builder instructions and manuals covering the operations, safety and
maintenance requirements and occupational health hazards relevant to fuel storage, fuel
bunkering, and fuel supply and associated systems for the use of the fuel, are to be
confirmed as being aboard the vessel.
i) Gas detection and other leakage detection equipment in compartments containing fuel
storage, fuel bunkering, and fuel supply equipment or components or associated
systems, including indicators and alarms, is to be confirmed in satisfactory operating
condition. Recalibration of the gas detection systems should be verified in accordance
with the manufacturers recommendations.
ii) Verification of the satisfactory operation of the control, monitoring and automatic shut-
Z25 down systems as far as practicable of the fuel supply and bunkering systems.
(cont)
iii) Operational test, as far as practicable, of the shutdown of ESD protected machinery
spaces.
Piping, hoses, emergency shut-down valves, remote operating valves, relief valves,
machinery and equipment for fuel storage, fuel bunkering, and fuel supply such as venting,
compressing, refrigerating, liquefying, heating, cooling or otherwise handling the fuel is to be
examined, as far as practicable. Means for inerting is to be examined. Stopping of pumps and
compressors upon emergency shut-down of the system is to be confirmed as far as
practicable.
Examination of the ventilation system, including portable ventilating equipment where fitted, is
to be made for spaces containing fuel storage, fuel bunkering, and fuel supply units or
components or associated systems, including air locks, pump rooms, compressor rooms, fuel
preparation rooms, fuel valve rooms, control rooms and spaces containing gas burning
equipment. Where alarms, such as differential pressure and loss of pressure alarms, are
fitted, these should be operationally tested as far as practicable.
Portable and fixed drip trays and insulation for the protection of the ships structure in the
event of leakage are to be examined.
Electrical bonding arrangements in hazardous areas, including bonding straps where fitted,
are to be examined.
The following are to be examined, so far as applicable. Insulation need not be removed, but
any deterioration or evidence of dampness is to be investigated:
i) External examination of the storage tanks including secondary barrier if fitted and
accessible.
vii) Testing of the remote and local closing of the installed main tank valve.
ii) Verification of satisfactory operation of the fuel bunkering control, monitoring and shut-
down systems.
Examination of the fuel supply system during working condition as far as practicable.
i) Verification of satisfactory operation of the fuel supply system control, monitoring and
shut-down systems.
ii) Testing of the remote and local closing of the master fuel valve for each engine
compartment.
4. Intermediate Survey
4.1 Schedule
4.1.1 The Intermediate Survey is to be held at or between either the 2nd or 3rd Annual
Survey.
4.1.2 Those items which are additional to the requirements of the Annual Surveys may be
surveyed either at or between the 2nd and 3rd Annual Survey.
4.2 Scope
4.2.1 General
In addition to the applicable requirements of the Annual Survey, the Intermediate Survey is
also to include:
Gas detectors, temperature sensors, pressure sensors, level indicators, and other equipment
providing input to the fuel safety system are to be randomly tested to confirm satisfactory
operating condition. Proper response of the fuel safety system upon fault conditions is to be
verified.
End of
Document
During discussions at the September 2015 Survey Panel Meeting, the members
supported developing common survey requirements for gas fuelled ships considering
the implementation of the IGF Code on ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017.
None.
The Survey Panel formed a Project Team to review the IGF Code to develop periodical
survey requirements for the gas fuel systems. The Form A and Form 1 were approved
by GPG on 10 February 2016. The project team held a workshop in Genoa on 14 March
2016 to develop the draft UR which was progressed through correspondence. During
the development of the draft UR, it was decided to also include ships utilizing other low
flashpoint fuels. The project team submitted a draft UR to the Survey Panel on 29 June
2016 for their approval. The Survey Panel raised comments which were sent to the
project team for consideration on 9 August 2016. The project reviewed the comments
and submitted a revised draft UR to the Survey Panel on 31 August 2016. The draft UR
was discussed and finalized at the Survey Panel Meeting held 7 9 September.
None.
.6 Dates:
Note:
1) There is no separate Technical Background (TB) document for New (Jan 2017).
Page 2 of 2