Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
LIFE CYCLE
&
GROWTH
PGP 20- OB II
Tuesday, 25th October , 2016
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
LIABILITY OF NEWNESS: the dangers associated with being the first in a new
environment.
A new organization is fragile because it lacks a formal structure.
Develop a plan for a new business
Statement of the organizations mission, goals, financial & strategic
objectives
List of all the functional and organizational resources required to
implement the idea
Timeline that contains specific milestones used to measure the progress of
the venture.
A POPULATION ECOLOGY MODEL
OF ORGANIZATIONAL BIRTH
Population ecology theory: explains the factors that affect the rate at which new
organizations are born (and die) in a population of existing organizations.
Population of organizations: the organizations that are competing for the same set of
resources in the environment
Population density: the number of organizations that can compete for the same
resources in a particular environment
Environmental niches: particular sets of resources or skills.
Number of births determined by the availability of resources
The founders of the company are usually technically or entrepreneurially oriented, and they
generally disdain management activities; their physical and mental energies are absorbed
entirely by making and selling a new product.
Communication among employees is frequent and informal.
Long hours of work are rewarded by modest salaries and the promise of ownership benefits.
Decisions and motivation are highly sensitive to marketplace feedback; management acts as
customers react.
Crisis of autonomy - Creative people lose control over new product development
DELEGATION
The next era of growth evolves from the successful application of a decentralized organizational structure. It
exhibits these characteristics:
Much greater responsibility is given to the managers of plants and market territories. Movement toward
product team structure
Bonuses are used to motivate employees.
Top-level executives at headquarters limit themselves to managing by exception based on periodic
reports from the field.
Management often concentrates on acquiring outside enterprises that can be lined up with other
decentralized units.
Communication from the top is infrequent and usually occurs by correspondence, telephone, or brief
visits to field locations.
Crisis of control as power struggles over resources emerge between top-level and
lower-level managers
COORDINATION
The evolutionary period of the coordination phase is characterized by the use of formal systems for achieving
greater coordination and by top-level executives taking responsibility for the initiation and administration of
these new systems. For example:
Decentralized units are merged into product groups. product/ multi divisional
Formal planning procedures are established and intensively reviewed.
Numerous staff members are hired and located at headquarters to initiate companywide programs of
control and review for line managers.
Capital expenditures are carefully weighed and parceled out across the organization.
Each product group is treated as an investment center where return on invested capital is an important
criterion used in allocating funds.
Certain technical functions, such as data processing, are centralized at headquarters, while daily operating
decisions remain decentralized.
Stock options and companywide profit sharing are used to encourage employees to identify with the
organization as a whole.
Crisis of red tape: Increasing reliance on rules and standard procedure; becomes overly
bureaucratic and stifles entrepreneurship
COLLABORATION
The last observable phase emphasizes strong interpersonal collaboration in an attempt to overcome
the red-tape crisis. Where Phase 4 was managed through formal systems and procedures, Phase 5
emphasizes spontaneity in management action through teams and the skillful confrontation of
interpersonal differences. Social control and self-discipline replace formal control. This transition is
especially difficult for the experts who created the coordination systems as well as for the line
managers who relied on formal methods for answers.
A more flexible and behavioral approach to management. Here are its characteristics:
The focus is on solving problems quickly through team action.
Teams are combined across functions to handle specific tasks.
COLLABORATION
(CONT..)
Staff experts at headquarters are reduced in number, reassigned, and combined into interdisciplinary teams
that consult with, not direct, field units.
A matrix-type structure is frequently used to assemble the right teams for the appropriate problems.
Formal control systems are simplified and combined into single multipurpose systems.
Conferences of key managers are held frequently to focus on major problems.
Educational programs are used to train managers in behavioral skills for achieving better teamwork and
conflict resolution.
Real-time information systems are integrated into daily decision-making processes.
Economic rewards are geared more to team performance than to individual achievement.
Experimenting with new practices is encouraged throughout the organization.
Crisis of ???????
ORGANIZATION PRACTICES
CATEGORY PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5
Problem
Management Efficiency of Expansion of Consolidation of
Make and sell solving and
Focus operations market organization
innovation
Organization Centralized Decentralized and Line-staff and
Informal Matrix of teams
Structure and functional geographical product groups
Top-
Individualistic &
Management Directive Delegative Watchdog Participative
entrepreneurial
Style
Plans and
Standards and Reports and profit Mutual goal
Control System Market results investment
cost centers centers setting
centers
Management
Salary & merit Profit sharing and
Reward Ownership Individual bonus Team bonus
increases stock options
Emphasis
ORGANIZATIONAL LIFE CYCLE:
Streamlining,
small-company
thinking
Sources: Adapted from Robert E. Quinn and Kim Cameron, Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence, Management
Science 29 (1983): 33-51; and Larry E. Greiner, Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow, Harvard Business Review 50 (July-August 1972): 37-46.
ORGANIZATIONAL DECLINE AND DEATH
ORGANIZATIONAL INERTIA: the forces inside an organization that make it resistant to
change
Risk aversion: managers become unwilling to bear the uncertainty of change as
organizations grow
The desire to maximize rewards: managers may increase the size of the
company to maximize their own rewards even when this growth reduces
organizational effectiveness
Overly bureaucratic culture: in large organizations, property rights can
become so strong that managers spend all their time protecting their specific
property rights instead of working to advance the organization
UNCERTAIN AND CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
Affect an organizations ability to obtain scarce resources, thereby leading to decline
Makes it difficult for top management to anticipate the need for change and to
manage the way organizations change and adapt to the environment
WEITZEL AND JONSSONS MODEL OF
ORGANIZATIONAL DECLINE
5 STAGES OF DECLINE
Stage 1: Blinded: organizations are unable to recognize the internal or external problems
that threaten their long-term survival.
Stage 2: Inaction: despite clear signs of deteriorating performance, top management takes
little actions to correct problems. Gap between acceptable performance and actual
performance increases.
Stage 3: Faulty action: managers may have made the wrong decisions because of conflict
in the top-management team, or they may have changed too little too late fearing more
harm than good from reorganization.
Stage 4: Crisis: by the time this stage has arrived, only radical changes in strategy and
structure can stop the decline.
Stage 5: Dissolution: decline is irreversible and the organization cannot recover
WEITZEL AND JONSSONS MODEL
OF ORGANIZATIONAL DECLINE
Stage 1:Blinded Stage 3:Faulty action
Stage 2: Inaction Stage 4:Crisis
Good info Acceptable Stage
performance 5:Dissolution
Prompt action
Performance
Corrective action
Effective
reorganization
Actual
performance
Environmental factor
a) velocity of environmental change,
b) content of change munificence
Organizational factors:
ownership, corporate control, culture, age, size, and industrial relations