Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
E L M H U R S T P A R K D I S T R I C T
B O A R D O F P A R K C O M M I S S I O N E R S
M E M O R A N D U M
ISSUE
Led by The Lakota Group, the planning team for the Districts Vision 2020 process has
completed the draft Vision 2020 Plan key findings and draft document based on the outcomes
of the engage, analyze, envision, and implement phases of the process. The planning team will
present these findings and an overview of the draft document at the Boards June 26, 2017
meeting.
DISCUSSION
The planning team developed the attached draft Vision 2020 Plan document to summarize the
Vision 2020 Comprehensive and Strategic Planning process and phases, key findings, and data
and feedback collected from the Board, community, stakeholders and staff. The Plan includes a
summary of the current state of the District and recommended future strategies. At the June 26,
2017 Board meeting, the planning team will present an overview of the draft document, key
findings, and recommended future strategies along with the outcomes of the action planning
completed by staff to address these strategies.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Board of Park Commissioners review the attached draft Vision 2020 Plan document for
discussion at the June 26, 2017 Board meeting.
Thank you.
Attachment: Draft Elmhurst Park District Vision 2020 Plan Final Report
DRAFT
COMPREHENSIVE &
STRATEGIC PLAN
DRAFT
BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
Vince Spaeth, President
Kevin Graf, Vice President
Doug Ennis, Commissioner
Mary Kies, Commissioner
Patricia Morissette-Moll, Commissioner
Tim Sheehan, Commissioner
Carolyn Ubriaco, Commissioner
STAFF
James Rogers, Executive Director
Kari Felkamp, Director of Marketing & Communications
Angela Ferrentino, Director of Parks & Facilities
Laura Guttman, Strategy and Planning Coordinator
Christi Jacobson, Director of Finance & Human Resources
Brian McDermott, Director of Enterprise Services
Nimfa Melesio, Administrative Office Manager
Cindy Szkolka, Director of Recreation
Allison Wiggins, Director of Information Technology
DRAFT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTIONIV
WHERE WE ARE TODAY 9
OUR VISION FOR TOMORROW 18
APPENDIX A: ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY 30
APPENDIX B: ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY 65
APPENDIX C: PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS 114
APPENDIX D: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 219
DRAFT
INTRODUCTION
iv
DRAFT
1
DRAFT
HEALTH + WELLNESS
RECREATION?
reduces risk of heart disease, hypertension,
and diabetes; improves muscle strength;
promotes weight loss; and boosts
cardiovascular, respiratory, and endocrine
systems. Studies have shown that enhanced
access to places for physical activity leads to
an increase in frequency of physical activity
for both adults and children. Active park
The Elmhurst Park District plays a vital users also require fewer physician visits and
experience lower health care costs than
role in enhancing the community. From those who used parks passively or not at all.
2
helping stakeholders understand their role
in the process.
3
shared long-term vision for the Park District
based on the Engage and Analyze phase
results. Alternative strategies for recreation
programming; existing parks and open
spaces; new parks, recreation facilities, and This chapter provides the Districts
open spaces; and area trail corridors were
tested, evaluated, and refined into a set of mission, vision, and values and
action items that the District will implement
over the next 1 to 10 years (1-3: Strategic
outlines the strategic action plan and
Initiatives, 1-10: Comprehensive Plan
Initiatives).
supporting implementation detail for
IMPLEMENT: In the final phase of the
the next 1, 3, 5, and 10 years.
planning process, the planning team,
staff, and Board of Commissioners refined
the strategies for the ten-year Vision.
A
Recommendations for near- and mid-term
capital and operational strategies were
outlined in a Five-Year Strategy Action Plan.
ELMHURST PARK
DISTRICT PROFILE
HISTORY greenhouse in 1924, and the Wilder Park Perhaps the most significant decade in
Conservatory then opened to the public. the Park Districts history was the 1970s,
The Elmhurst Park District was when the District blossomed into a full-
established on June 5, 1920, to meet In the late 1920s and early 1930s, Salt service agency. In 1971, voters approved
the leisure and recreational needs Creek, East End, and Butterfield Parks a $3.9 million bond referendum for
of the community. Soon thereafter, were established. East End Pool opened land acquisition and development.
negotiations were opened for the on June 26, 1937, with a Grand Splash The majority of EPDs present land was
acquisition of the Wilder estate. The of 750 youths who had lined up along purchased during this time, along with
estate consisted of an undeveloped the edge of the pool in readiness for its new park development. Five new special
cow pasture to the north and the family big moment. The pool was an immediate facilities also opened during this period,
home, gardens, and clay tennis courts success for the District, with 1,200 including: The Courts (1972), an indoor
to the south. Original development of people showing up on its second day. tennis, racquetball, and handball facility;
the gardens had begun in 1868 by Seth Sugar Creek Golf Course (early 1970s), a
and Elizabeth Wadhams, who built their The first recreation programs were
9-hole golf course owned and operated
home, known as White Birch, along with offered in 1942 and included baton,
through a partnership between Elmhurst
a greenhouse and gardens. They planted handicrafts, archery, baseball, and ballet.
Park District and the Village of Villa Park;
numerous trees representing a variety Ben Allison Playground and Eldridge
the first Elmhurst Community Center
of species to create a true garden spot in Park opened in the early 1950s. The
(1979); The Abbey Leisure Center (1975),
Elmhurst. Abbey was also established during this
a senior citizen leisure programming
period as a place for teenagers to gather,
facility; and The Depot on York Road
The Park District acquired the Wilder but did not become part of the Park
(1971). The Depot was renovated as a
property in 1921, making it the first District until 1964. During the 1960s,
bicentennial project in 1975.
public park in Elmhurst. The Park seven new parks opened, including the
District added the conservatory to the York Commons Pool, dedicated in 1967.
WHERE WE
ARE TODAY
DRAFT
has a total population 46,337 and this In its 458 acres of parks and open space, the
Elmhurst Park District provides a vast array
is expected to increase to 47,282 by of recreational opportunities for residents,
including 18 playgrounds, 28 baseball /
2021. softball fields, 25 tennis courts, 28 multi-
purpose fields, 75 garden plots, and 5.9
miles of trails within its parks. The District
also has access to two regional trails. Indoor
facilities available include The Abbey Senior
Center, Wagner Community Center, Courts
Plus, The Hub, Wilder Mansion, and four
preschool facilities Butterfield, Eldridge,
Wilder, and Crestview. In total, the District
operates 202,255 square feet of indoor
space. For this study 147,115 square feet of
indoor space was evaluated and studied,
93,600 square feet of which is dedicated to
recreation programming.
WELCOME
ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT
ELMHURST
NAPERVILLE
WHEATON
CAROL STREAM
LOMBARD
GLEN ELLYN
ADDISON
WOODRIDGE
FACILITIES
DuPage Medical Building 135 Palmer Drive. PARK DISTRICT
Buttereld Park Recreation Building
Crestview Park Recreation Building COMPARISON
Eldridge Park Recreation Building
Smalley Bath House
Wilder Park Recreation Building
Wilder Park Former Administration Building
225 Prospect
Sugar Creek Golf Maintenance Building
COURTS PLUS
THE ABBEY WAGNER
WILDER
MANSION
4 SMALL
PRESCHOOL
BUILDINGS
147,115
SQUARE FEET
INDOOR SPACE*
*included in this study
STAKEHOLDERS
City of Elmhurst, Elmhurst Youth Commission, Elmhurst Senior Commission, Elmhurst Library, Village of Villa
Park, DuPage County / IC Catholic Prep, School District 205, Elmhurst College / Elmhurst Chamber of
Commerce, Edwards / Elmhurst Healthcare, Active Trans / Elmhurst Bike Club, Greenman Theatre, Elmhurst
Symphony, Elmhurst Chorale Union, Center of Performing Arts, Elmhurst Cool Cities Coalition, Crestview
Garden Club, Elmhurst Garden Club, Lizzardo Museum, Ray Graham Association, People For Elmhurst Parks
Foundation, AYSO, Elmhurst Eagles Football, Team Elmhurst, Elmhurst Baseball, Elmhurst Youth Baseball
PUBLIC
46,337
AGING GROWING BECOMING INCREASINGLY
IN PLACE MORE DIVERSE AFFLUENT
45,419 2016 2020 2016 2020
HOUSEHOLD
INCOME
CURRENT POPULATION ANNAUAL RATE
ELMHURST
PARK
DISTRICT ELMHURST ILLINOIS USA
30% 33%
8.1% 9.4%
HISPANIC
ORIGIN
HISPANIC
ORIGIN
1.8% 1.3% 1.9%
55+ AGE POPULATION
WHITE ASIAN TWO OR MORE
BLACK OTHER AMERICAN INDIAN
25
TENNIS
COURTS
2
REGIONAL 28
TRAILS MULTIPURPOSE
ILL
INO
FIELDS
IS
PR
AI
RI
E
PA
TH
458 18
ACRES
Y
28 PLAY-
A
PARK
W
GROUNDS 75
N
BASEBALL
EE
&OPEN
GR
SOFTBALL SPACE
GARDEN
PLOTS
K
FIELDS
EE
CR
LT
SA
9 5.9
HOLE GOLF
MILES OF TRAILS EN
IN PARKS GA
COURSE
GE
ME
4 2
NT
1. COMMUNITY 3
2. BOARD 5
3. STAKEHOLDERS
4. STAFF
5. WEBSITE
1
61 167 170 7 26 9
STAFF STAFF RESPONDENTS BOARD MEMBERS STAFF STAFF
STAFF
COURTS
FIELDS
PLAY-
DRINKING
FOUNTAINS
GREEN
SPACES
NATURAL
AREAS
PARKING
LOTS
PATHS
GROUNDS
REST-
ROOMS
SEATING
AREAS
park open space, 45% of households making these sports fields
participated in recreation programs upgrades using tax dollars.
in the past 12 months, exceeding the THE COMMUNITY WOULD BENEFIT FROM THE
national average of 34%. Overall, 72% of NEW AMENITIES, INCLUDING A DOG PARK AND
households OUTDOOR NATURE CENTER.
use the The top outdoor recreation priorities, according to the survey, are walking and
District biking trails, off-leash dog parks, and an outdoor nature center. Additionally, the lack
for their of a dog park puts the community in a deficiency compared to state and national
indoor and benchmarks. According to community input, the preferred site for the dog park is
outdoor Eldridge Park, but they also may support placing the dog park at Salt Creek Park,
recreation a partnership with another agency, or acquiring land for the amenity. Community
needs and input revealed that the preferred amenities for an outdoor nature center are: hiking
activities. trails, nature-based / themed play, open air shelter, water feature, gardens, fishing
overlook, ropes course, and bike course. A dog park and outdoor nature center are
also a high priority for the Board, staff, and stakeholders. In addition, implementing
new amenities including picnic shelters, pavilions, trails and playgrounds, would
help decrease the deficiencies for benchmarks and may be implemented as part of
the aforementioned community priorities. It is especially important to meet these
benchmarks because Elmhurst residents are more likely than typical Americans to
participate in walking, jogging, hiking, and bicycling according to trends research.
GRAND OPENING!!
WAGNER
INDOOR SPORTS
FACILITY
135
PALMER
ADULTING CONTINUING
EDUCATION
Technology Health
College CPR
Photography Cooking
Computer Programs Gardening
Foreign Language Classes
ADULT FITNESS
COMMUNITY AND WELLNESS
EVENTS Yoga
Concerts Zumba
Movies in the Park Pilates
Music in the Park Walking
Nature Programs Basketball
Free festivals Ballet
Nutrition
OUR
VISION FOR
TOMORROW
OVERVIEW
Mission
Mission Weenrichliveswhilehavingfun.
Weenrichliveswhilehavingfun.
VisionVision Tobeanationalleaderinprovidingmemorableparksandrecreationexperiencestoourcommu
Tobeanationalleaderinprovidingmemorableparksandrecreationexperiencestoourco
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS
Integrity Integrity Wewillalwaysdotherightthingandwewilldoittherightway
Wewillalwaysdotherightthingandwewilldoittherightway
CustomerServiceExcellence
CustomerServiceExcellence
Wewillexceedcustomerexpectationsconsistentlyandpresentthe'wow'moment
Wewillexceedcustomerexpectationsconsistentlyandpresentthe'wow'moment
CommunityFocused
CommunityFocused Attheendoftheday,it'sallaboutthecommunityweserve
Attheendoftheday,it'sallaboutthecommunityweserve
Themes+Goals
Themes+Goals PerformanceMetric(s)
PerformanceMetric(s
PA PA Parks:Meetcommunityneedsforparks,openspace,andoutdooramenities.
Parks:Meetcommunityneedsforparks,openspace,andoutdooramenities.
PARKS PARKS PA1:Maintainandupdateexistingparks,openspaces,andamenities.
PA1:Maintainandupdateexistingparks,openspaces,andamenities.
Meetcommunityneedforparks,open PA2:Addressopenspaceandamenitydeficienciesandequitability.
Meetcommunityneedforparks,open PA2:Addressopenspaceandamenitydeficienciesandequitability.
space,andoutdooramenities.
space,andoutdooramenities.
PA3:Providenewrecreationalopportunitiestorespondtocommunityneeds.
PA3:Providenewrecreationalopportunitiestorespondtocommunityneeds.
FA FA Facilities:Meetcommunityneedsfornewandexistingindoorrecreationspace.
Facilities:Meetcommunityneedsfornewandexistingindoorrecreationspace.
FACILITIESFACILITIES FA1:Maintainandupdateexistingfacilities.
FA1:Maintainandupdateexistingfacilities.
Meetcommunityneedfornewand
MeetcommunityneedfornewandFA2:Investinnewindoorfacilities/spacestorespondtocommunityneeds.
FA2:Investinnewindoorfacilities/spacestorespondtocommunityneeds.
existingindoorrecreationspace.
existingindoorrecreationspace.
FA3:Optimizeuseofourexistingfacilities.
FA3:Optimizeuseofourexistingfacilities.
PR PR Programming:Innovativeprogrammingtomeetcommunityneeds.
Programming:Innovativeprogrammingtomeetcommunityneeds.
PROGRAMMING
PROGRAMMING PR1:Remainawareofandresponsivetotrends.
PR1:Remainawareofandresponsivetotrends.
Innovativeprogrammingtomeet PR2:Regularlyengagethecommunitytounderstandtheirneeds.
Innovativeprogrammingtomeet PR2:Regularlyengagethecommunitytounderstandtheirneeds.
communityneeds.
communityneeds. PR3:Providesustainable,highqualityandinclusiveprogramofferings.
PR3:Providesustainable,highqualityandinclusiveprogramofferings.
CO CO Communication:Exceptionalandconsistentguestexperience.
Communication:Exceptionalandconsistentguestexperience.
COMMUNICATIONS CO1:Fostera"customerfirst"environment.
COMMUNICATIONS CO1:Fostera"customerfirst"environment.
Exceptionalandconsistentguest
Exceptionalandconsistentguest
CO2:Addresscustomerservicestaffingneeds.
CO2:Addresscustomerservicestaffingneeds.
experience.
experience.
FI FI Finance:Sustainablerevenuestrategiesandfundingoptions.
Finance:Sustainablerevenuestrategiesandfundingoptions.
FINANCE FINANCE FI1:Reviewandimprovecostrecovery.
FI1:Reviewandimprovecostrecovery. .
Sustainablerevenuestrategiesandfunding FI2:Seekalternatesourcesofrevenue.
Sustainablerevenuestrategiesandfunding FI2:Seekalternatesourcesofrevenue.
options. options. FI3:ConsiderpursuingGeneralorRecreationFundreferendum.
FI3:ConsiderpursuingGeneralorRecreationFundreferendum.
IO IO InternalOperations:Employeegrowthanddevelopment.
InternalOperations:Employeegrowthanddevelopment.
INTERNALOPERATIONS IO1:Continuetoinvestintraining,continuingeducationandpersonaldevelopmentprograms.
INTERNALOPERATIONS IO1:Continuetoinvestintraining,continuingeducationandpersonaldevelopmentprograms.
Employeegrowthanddevelopment. IO2:Improveinternalcommunication.
Employeegrowthanddevelopment. IO2:Improveinternalcommunication.
IO3:Improveemployeebenefits.
IO3:Improveemployeebenefits.
IO4:Becomeamoredatadrivenorganization.
IO4:Becomeamoredatadrivenorganization.
IO5:IncreasefocusonDistrictwidesuccessionplanning.
IO5:IncreasefocusonDistrictwidesuccessionplanning.
CommunityFocused,Customer
PA PA1 1.1aUpdateConradFischerPark $$$
ServiceExcellence
CommunityFocused,Customer
PA PA1 1.1bUpdateCrestviewParkplayground,athleticcourts,andseatingareas. $$$
ServiceExcellence
FA2,PR1,PR2, 2.4:Explorefacilitypartnershipstoincreaseandmee
1.1cImproveathleticfields,includingbackstopsandnets,atVanVoorst,YorkCommonsPark,and FA
CommunityFocused,Customer
PA PA1 PR3 indoorsportsfacility,etc.)
$$
Butterfield ServiceExcellence
FI FI2
CommunityFocused,Customer 2.4:Developsponsorshipplantoevaluatetruespons
FA FA3,PR1,PR3 3.1:Conductindoorspaceutilizationstudyanddeterminefutureuseofallfacilities. $$
ServiceExcellence
PA PA2
CommunityFocused,Customer 2.1:Exploreopenspacepartnershipstoincreasecom
FA FA2,PR1,PR2 1.1a:UpdateWagnerCommunityCenterMasterPlan. FA2,PR1,PR2, 2.4:Explorefacilitypartnershipstoincreaseandmeetfacilityspaceneeds(ex:performingartsfacility,
$$ Communit
FA ServiceExcellence,Integrity
PR3 indoorsportsfacility,etc.) ServiceE
2.2:AnnuallyconducttheMalcolmBaldrigeSurveyt
CommunityFocused,Customer
IO IO2
FA FA2,PR1,PR2 2.1:DeterminefutureuseofPalmerDrivesite/building. $$
organizationalcultureandstrategiestoaddressit
ServiceExcellence,Integrity
FI FI2 2.4:Developsponsorshipplantoevaluatetruesponsorablevalueandviablesponsors Integrity,
PA PA3,PA2
CommunityFocused,Customer 3.2:Studythefeasibilityofanoutdoornaturecenter
FA FA2,PR1,PR3 2.2a:Determineapproachtoindoorsportsfacility. $$$$ Customer
PA PA2 ServiceExcellence
2.1:Exploreopenspacepartnershipstoincreasecommunityofferings
FA2,PR1,PR2, 2.4:Explorefacilitypartnershipstoincreaseandmeetfacilityspaceneeds(ex:performingartsfacility, CommunityFocused,Customer
FA $$$
PR3 indoorsportsfacility,etc.) ServiceExcellence,Integrity
IO IO5
Fun,CommunityFocused, 5.1:Establishcrosstrainingandjobshadowprogram
PR PR1,PR2,PR3 3.1:InvestigateandofferprogramsidentifiedashighprioritiesinCommunitySurvey $$
2.2:AnnuallyconducttheMalcolmBaldrigeSurveytogainemployeefeedbackandcontinueassessing
IO IO2 CustomerServiceExcellence
FI FI2 organizationalcultureandstrategiestoaddressit
2.4:Developsponsorshipplantoevaluatetruesponsorablevalueandviablesponsors Integrity,CommunityFocused TBD
PR PR1
CustomerServiceExcellence, 1.3:Establishtargetfornewprogramofferings,and
CO CO1 1.1:Establishadistrictwidecustomerservicemodel. $ Integrity
PA PA3,PA2 CommunityFocused,Fun
3.2:Studythefeasibilityofanoutdoornaturecenter
CustomerService,Community Com
PA PA2 2.1:Exploreopenspacepartnershipstoincreasecommunityofferings $$
Focused
IO IO2
CustomerServiceExcellence, 2.3:Institutenonstructuredopportunitiesfororgan
CO CO1,IO1,IO2 2.2:Evaluatestaffingstructuretoidentifyandprioritizecustomerservicetraining/hiringneeds $ Fun,Integr
IO IO5 Integrity
5.1:Establishcrosstrainingandjobshadowprogram
2.2:AnnuallyconducttheMalcolmBaldrigeSurveytogainemployeefeedbackandcontinueassessing
IO IO2 Integrity $
organizationalcultureandstrategiestoaddressit 4.3:Conductannualbenchmarkingstudycomparing
IO IO4
FI FI3 3.1:Determineapproachtoreferendum Integrity,CommunityFocused metricsTBD
PR PR1 1.3:Establishtargetfornewprogramofferings,andprovideincentivesforstaff
Integrity,CustomerService, Fun,Co
PA PA3,PA2 3.2:Studythefeasibilityofanoutdoornaturecenter $$
CommunityFocused
PR PR2 2.1:Implementrewardsprogramtoincentivizeparti
FI FI1 1.2:Analyzecostrecoverydatatomaximizerevenuepotential Integrity,CommunityFocused $
IO IO2 2.3:Institutenonstructuredopportunitiesfororganiccommunication(e.g.HallwayBuddies)
Fun,Integrity,CustomerService Fun,Co
IO IO5 5.1:Establishcrosstrainingandjobshadowprogram $
Excellence
FI FI1 1.1:Implementcostrecoverygoals 4.3:ConductannualbenchmarkingstudycomparingEPDmetricstobestpracticeNRPAfieldreport
Integrity,CommunityFocused $ Custome
IO IO4
PR PR1 metrics
1.3:Establishtargetfornewprogramofferings,andprovideincentivesforstaff TABLELEGEND/KEY
Fun,CommunityFocused $ Com
COST
Integrity,CustomerService
IO IO4,IO5 4.1:Utilizeadditionaldataandanalyticsforplanningandmonitoringperformance
PR PR2 $
2.1:Implementrewardsprogramtoincentivizeparticipation $
$0$25,000 Fun,Co
Excellence,CommunityFocused
IO IO2 2.3:Institutenonstructuredopportunitiesfororganiccommunication(e.g.HallwayBuddies) $$
Fun,CommunityFocused
$25,001$99,999 $
$$$ $100,000$499,999
IO IO3 3.1:Implement2017CompensationStudy Integrity $$$$ $$$
>$500,000
4.3:ConductannualbenchmarkingstudycomparingEPDmetricstobestpracticeNRPAfieldreport CustomerServiceExcellence,
IO IO4 $
metrics CommunityFocused
TABLELEGEND/KEY TIMEFRAME/DURATION
IO IO3 3.2:Expandbenefitsofferedtoparttimestaff Integrity TBD
6months(0)
COST
PR PR2 2.1:Implementrewardsprogramtoincentivizeparticipation $ $0$25,000 Fun,CommunityFocused
6months1year(25)$
$$ $25,001$99,999 Fun,CustomerServiceExcellence, 13years(50)
IO IO1 1.1:EstablishandinvestinDistrictwidetrainingplanforalllevelsofstaff $$
$$$ $100,000$499,999 CommunityFocused,Integrity 35years(75)
$$$$ >$500,000 5years(100)
TIMEFRAME/DURATION PROGRESS
6months(0) Started(10)
6months1year(25) Ongoing(50)
13years(50) Completed(100)
24 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE
35years(75) Delayed/Stopped(0) OUR VISION
5years(100)
PROGRESS
DRAFT
Year1
Timeframe Department/Staffing
ration AnticipatedStart AnticipatedCompletion Reporting Lead StaffGroups Implementation Progress
1.2:Updatecapitalimprovementplanforparksandfacilitiesandimprove/replaceparksandfacilities CommunityFocused,Customer
FA/PA FA1,PA1 $
withlowscorestoimproveoverallsystem. ServiceExcellence
CommunityFocused,Customer
FA FA2,PR1,PR3 2.2:Expandcommunityindoorrecreationspace. $$$$
ServiceExcellence
CommunityFocused,Customer
FA FA1,PR2 1.1:Updatefacilitymasterplans $$
ServiceExcellence,Integrity
Integrity,CommunityFocused,
PR PR1 1.2:Remaincurrentwithandinvestinindustryandinnovativetrends $
CustomerServiceExcellence
CommunityFocused,Customer
PR PR2 2.2:Gatherongoingfeedbackfromparticipantsandcommunityonprogramwants/needs $
ServiceExcellence
2.3:Explorelocationsfornewamenitiestomeetlevelofservicebenchmarksandfulfillamenity CommunityFocused,Customer
PA PA2 $$$
deficiencies ServiceExcellence
Fun,CustomerServiceExcellence,
IO IO5 5.2:Createpolicyandtrainingcurriculumforfutureleaders $
CommunityFocused,Integrity
Integrity,CustomerService
IO IO4,IO2 4.2:Trackperformancemetricstoenhanceefficiencies,productivity,andcustomerloyalty TBD
Excellence
Integrity,CustomerService
IO IO1 1.2:Definegrowthexpectationsforeachjobdescription $
Excellence
Integrity,CustomerService,
PA PA2,PA1 2.2:EstablishaDistrictwidelevelofservicepolicy $
CommunityFocused
CustomerServiceExcellence,
CO CO1,CO2 2.3:Unitecustomerserviceandregistrationstaffintoonedepartment $
CommunityFocused
FA2,PR1,PR2, CommunityFocused,Customer
FA 2.3:Undertakeaneedsassessmentandcreateafinancialandfacilityplanfornewseniorcenterfacility $$
PR3 ServiceExcellence,Integrity
Integrity,CustomerService,
PA PA1 1.3:Developparkdesignguidelines $
CommunityFocused
Integrity,CommunityFocused,
PR PR2 2.3:UpdatetheCommunityNeedsAssessmenteveryfiveyears $$$
CustomerServiceExcellence
ar25
Timeframe Department/Staffing
AnticipatedStart AnticipatedCompletion Reporting Lead StaffGroups Implementation Progress
FI FI2 2.4:Developsponsorshipplantoevaluatetruespons
DRAFT
PA PA2 2.1:Exploreopenspacepartnershipstoincreasecom
FA2,PR1,PR2, 2.4:Explorefacilitypartnershipstoincreaseandmeetfacilityspaceneeds(ex:performingartsfacility, Communit
FA
PR3 indoorsportsfacility,etc.) ServiceE
2.2:AnnuallyconducttheMalcolmBaldrigeSurveyt
IO IO2
organizationalcultureandstrategiestoaddressit
FI FI2 2.4:Developsponsorshipplantoevaluatetruesponsorablevalueandviablesponsors Integrity,
PA PA3,PA2 3.2:Studythefeasibilityofanoutdoornaturecenter
Customer
FA2,PR1,PR2, PA PA2 2.1:Exploreopenspacepartnershipstoincreasecommunityofferings
FAFA FA2,PR1,PR2,2.4:Explorefacilitypartnershipstoincreaseandmeetfacilityspaceneeds(ex:performingartsfacility,
2.4:Explorefacilitypartnershipstoincreaseandmeetfacilityspaceneeds(ex:performingartsfacility, CommunityFocused,Customer
CommunityFocused,Customer $$$
PR3 indoorsportsfacility,etc.) ServiceExcellence,Integrity $$$
PR3 indoorsportsfacility,etc.) IO ServiceExcellence,Integrity
IO5 5.1:Establishcrosstrainingandjobshadowprogram
2.2:AnnuallyconducttheMalcolmBaldrigeSurveytogainemployeefeedbackandcontinueassessing
IO IO2
FI FI FI2FI2 organizationalcultureandstrategiestoaddressit
2.4:Developsponsorshipplantoevaluatetruesponsorablevalueandviablesponsors Integrity,CommunityFocused TBD
2.4:Developsponsorshipplantoevaluatetruesponsorablevalueandviablesponsors Integrity,CommunityFocused TBD
PR PR1 1.3:Establishtargetfornewprogramofferings,and
Integrity
PA PA3,PA2 3.2:Studythefeasibilityofanoutdoornaturecenter
CustomerService,Community
PAPA PA2 2.1:Exploreopenspacepartnershipstoincreasecommunityofferings CustomerService,Community $$ Com
PA2 2.1:Exploreopenspacepartnershipstoincreasecommunityofferings Focused $$
IO IO2 Focused 2.3:Institutenonstructuredopportunitiesfororgan
Fun,Integr
IO IO5 5.1:Establishcrosstrainingandjobshadowprogram
2.2:AnnuallyconducttheMalcolmBaldrigeSurveytogainemployeefeedbackandcontinueassessing
IO IO IO2IO2 2.2:AnnuallyconducttheMalcolmBaldrigeSurveytogainemployeefeedbackandcontinueassessing Integrity $
organizationalcultureandstrategiestoaddressit Integrity $
4.3:Conductannualbenchmarkingstudycomparing
organizationalcultureandstrategiestoaddressit IO IO4
metrics
PR PR1 1.3:Establishtargetfornewprogramofferings,andprovideincentivesforstaff
Integrity,CustomerService, Fun,Co
PAPA PA3,PA2 3.2:Studythefeasibilityofanoutdoornaturecenter Integrity,CustomerService, $$
PA3,PA2 3.2:Studythefeasibilityofanoutdoornaturecenter $$
CommunityFocused
CommunityFocused
PR PR2 2.1:Implementrewardsprogramtoincentivizeparti
IO IO2 2.3:Institutenonstructuredopportunitiesfororganiccommunication(e.g.HallwayBuddies)
Fun,Integrity,CustomerService Fun,Co
Fun,Integrity,CustomerService
IO IO IO5IO5 5.1:Establishcrosstrainingandjobshadowprogram
5.1:Establishcrosstrainingandjobshadowprogram $
Excellence
Excellence
4.3:ConductannualbenchmarkingstudycomparingEPDmetricstobestpracticeNRPAfieldreport Custome
IO IO4
PRPR PR1 metrics
1.3:Establishtargetfornewprogramofferings,andprovideincentivesforstaff TABLELEGEND/KEY
Fun,CommunityFocused Com
PR1 1.3:Establishtargetfornewprogramofferings,andprovideincentivesforstaff Fun,CommunityFocused $
COST
PR PR2 $
2.1:Implementrewardsprogramtoincentivizeparticipation $0$25,000 Fun,Co
IO IO IO2IO2 2.3:Institutenonstructuredopportunitiesfororganiccommunication(e.g.HallwayBuddies)
2.3:Institutenonstructuredopportunitiesfororganiccommunication(e.g.HallwayBuddies) $$
Fun,CommunityFocused
Fun,CommunityFocused
$25,001$99,999 $
$$$ $100,000$499,999
4.3:ConductannualbenchmarkingstudycomparingEPDmetricstobestpracticeNRPAfieldreport
$$$$ >$500,000
CustomerServiceExcellence,
4.3:ConductannualbenchmarkingstudycomparingEPDmetricstobestpracticeNRPAfieldreport CustomerServiceExcellence,
IO IO IO4IO4 $
metrics
metrics CommunityFocused
CommunityFocused
TABLELEGEND/KEY TIMEFRAME/DURATION
COST 6months(0)
PRPR PR2
PR2 2.1:Implementrewardsprogramtoincentivizeparticipation
2.1:Implementrewardsprogramtoincentivizeparticipation$ $0$25,000
Fun,CommunityFocused
6months1year(25)$
Fun,CommunityFocused
$$ $25,001$99,999 13years(50)
$$$ $100,000$499,999 35years(75)
$$$$ >$500,000 5years(100)
TABLELEGEND/KEY
TABLELEGEND/KEY TIMEFRAME/DURATION PROGRESS
COST
COST 6months(0) Started(10)
$$ $0$25,000
$0$25,000 6months1year(25) Ongoing(50)
$$$$ $25,001$99,999
$25,001$99,999 13years(50) Completed(100)
$$$
$$$ $100,000$499,999
$100,000$499,999 35years(75) Delayed/Stopped(0)
$$$$
$$$$ >$500,000
>$500,000 5years(100)
TIMEFRAME/DURATION
TIMEFRAME/DURATION PROGRESS
6months(0)
6months(0) Started(10)
6months1year(25)
6months1year(25) Ongoing(50)
13years(50)
13years(50) Completed(100)
35years(75)
35years(75) Delayed/Stopped(0)
5years(100)
5years(100)
PROGRESS
PROGRESS
Started(10)
Started(10)
Ongoing(50)
Ongoing(50)
Completed(100)
Completed(100)
Delayed/Stopped(0)
Delayed/Stopped(0)
Statistically-valid Survey
The District conducted a statistically-valid community needs assessment survey in the fall of 2016. The survey had a return
rate that accurately represents a sampling of the community population and was administered both online and through the
mail. A total of 328 completed surveys were returned with a at a 95% level of confidence and a 5.4% margin of error.
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 31
KEY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
AND FOCUS GROUPS
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 33
PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES
The District and planning team Process: The planning team compiled These interactive stations included:
facilitated three public open houses a series of informational boards that Big Map Exercise: Attendees were
during three different phases of the explained the purpose, goals, and asked to place stickers on a large
planning process. Each open house had objectives of the comprehensive and map of the Elmhurst Park District to
a different purpose and content, but all strategic planning process. Additional identify where they lived, worked,
were facilitated in the same self-guided information on the informational boards and played.
open house format. The following included:
information summarizes the purpose, Today / Tomorrow Exercise:
Project Time-line Attendees were asked to describe
process, and findings of each meeting. Project Process
Overall, 107 community members parks and recreation in Elmhurst
Planning Team using a sticky note.
attended the three meetings total. Overview of the Elmhurst Park
District Program Offerings: Attendees were
Topics to be Studied asked to identify, using dot stickers,
OPEN HOUSE 1 Community Demographic Profile programs or activities offered by
the Park District that they have
The first public open house occurred on
participated in. On a second board,
October 19, 2016 at The Abbey Senior
In addition to informational display they were asked to place a dot
Center. The purpose of this open house
boards, attendees had the opportunity sticker next to a program area they
was to provide the community with an
to provide their initial thoughts and wanted to see expanded.
introduction to, and overview of, the
comprehensive and strategic planning ideas at interactive stations. Comment Cards: Attendees were
process and gather feedback on initial asked to write their thoughts for
thoughts and ideas for the future. the future on a comment card.
Sixteen community members attended
this meeting.
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 35
Process: The planning team compiled Findings: With 107 participants, there
a series of interactive workshop boards was a wealth of information to guide the
on which the community provided their remaining steps in the planning process.
feedback. These interactive stations Findings include:
included: Existing Park Enhancement Survey
Existing Park Enhancement Survey: High Priorities:
Based on the park assessments York Commons Park
results, 12 parks received scores of Crestview Park
C or lower. Attendees were asked
to identify whether improvements Conrad Fischer Park
were high, medium, or low Existing Facility Enhancement
priorities for each park site. Survey High Priorities:
Existing Facility Enhancement Wagner Community Center
Survey: Based on the facility Wilder Recreation Building
assessment results, all but
New Outdoor Nature Center Visual
one facility received a score
Preference Survey Top Five:
of C or lower. Attendees were
Hiking Trails
asked to identify whether park
improvements were high, medium, Nature-Based / Nature-
The Elmhurst Bucks activity provided
or low priorities for each facility. Themed Play
valuable insight into the priorities of
New Outdoor Nature Center Visual Open Air Shelter community residents. The majority
Preference Survey: Attendees were Water Feature of funds were split, almost equally,
asked to identify their top three across three categories - New Indoor
preferred amenities for an outdoor Gardens Facilities ($99 or 27%), Existing Parks and
nature center. New Dog Park Location Survey Top Amenities ($86 or 24%), and Existing
Three: Indoor Facilities ($84 or 23%). Specific
New Dog Park Location Survey:
Eldridge Park ideas in these top three categories
Attendees were asked to identify,
include:
out of six options, their preferred Salt Creek Park
site or strategy for a new dog park. New Indoor Facilities:
Land Acquisition
Indoor pool
New and Existing Facility Strategy New and Existing Facility Strategy
Preferences: A series of boards Indoor playground
Preferences:
presented three to six scenarios Senior Center: Renovate 135 Senior Center
for addressing the small recreation Palmer Drive and relocate
buildings, senior center, Wagner New Aquatic Center
senior programming
Community Center, and indoor Indoor basketball
sports facility. Attendees were New Indoor Sports Facility:
Acquire land to construct new Indoor hockey
asked to identify their preferred
strategy for each topic. indoor sports / recreation Existing Parks and Amenities:
facility. Baseball field improvements
Program Priorities: Attendees
were asked to use post-it notes Wagner Community Center: Berens and Plunkett outfield
and provide their ideas regarding Renovate and expand improvements
potential program improvements Wagner Community Center
Jaycee Tot Lot
within three categories. with gymnasium and multi-
purpose rooms. Crestview update
Elmhurst Bucks Activity: Attendees
Small Recreation Buildings: Pioneer Park
were given $10 in Elmhurst Bucks
and were asked to allocate their Consolidate into two satellite More restrooms
funds in five categories. In addition facilities (north / Wagner,
Update north end parks
to allocating their dollars to a south, and central).
specific category, they could write Existing Indoor Facilities:
Suggested new programs identified at Courts Plus
a specific improvement theyd like
the Program Priority activity include:
their dollar to go towards on the Rec Center, Snack Shop at
back if desired. Categories included Outdoor theatre Wagner
Existing Parks, Existing Facilities, Concerts in the park
Renovate Wagner
New Parks, New Facilities, and Stitching circle
Programs. Calligraphy Face-lift at Abbey Senior
Ballroom dance Center
Winter basketball
36 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX A
STATISTICALLY-VALID
SURVEY
on each program. Based on the sum Developmentofnewindoorfacilities:$20.02 Adult fitness and wellness
Based on the priority investment rating
Other:$7.00
of respondents top four choices, the (PIR), the following three programs were
Programs for teens
three most important program areas to Residentswerethenaskedtoindicatetheoverallvaluetheyreceivefromthetaxesthatgoto
Golf lessons and leagues
rated as high priorities for investment:
theParkDistrict.Amajority(66%)indicatedthevaluewaseitherexcellent(30%)orgood
residents were: adult fitness and wellness Adult continuing education
programs (44%), community events Adult fitness and wellness
(36%).
(33%), and adult continuing education programs (PIR=200) Households with no Children (20-
Benefits.Respondentswereaskedtoindicatehowstronglytheyagreewithvariousstatements
programs (20%). Community
describing benefits events (PIR=142)receive from64)
that households parks, trails, and nature areas. Of the 12
Adult continuing education Adult fitness and wellness
statementsthefollowingthreereceivedthehighestlevelsofagreement,baseduponthesumof
Adult fitness and wellness programs programs (PIR=114) Adult continuing education
were the most important program for all The chart above shows the overall Community events
households, most likely because an adult Priority Investment Rating (PIR) for each Pageviii
in the household filled out the survey. Adult programs for 62 and older
of the 30 programs that were rated. A
Youth sports (14.9%) was also important Priority Investment Rating (PIR) was also Adult sports programs
to Households with Children (under 10) completed for all households. The results Households with no Children (65+)
and adult programs for 62+ (20.5%) was revealed the information in the chart to Adult programs for 62 and older
also important for Households with no the right.
Children (65+). The other two household Adult fitness and wellness
categories did not have another Golf lessons and leagues
significant program area to note. Community events
Special events for adults only
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 41
ONLINE COMMUNITY
SURVEYS
The planning team facilitated two The second and final online community closely behind. In terms of quality, Wilder
online community surveys during the survey launched May 15, 2017, and Park was ranked highest, with 98.5% of
comprehensive and strategic planning concluded May 30, 2017. The purpose respondent rating the condition of the
process. The first online survey was of this survey was to supplement the park as good or excellent.
available on the Vision 2020 website final public open houses and provide
from late-November to the end of 2016. the general public with the opportunity Program Participation and Ratings:
The online survey supplemented the to give their input on action items and Nearly 70% (68.7%) of survey
hard copy and emailed statistically-valid priorities. This survey received 428 respondents participated in a Park
survey. Unlike the statistically-valid responses. District program over the last year, with
survey, however, the online survey was most participating in 2-3 programs per
available to all District residents and The findings of each survey are year. The overall quality of programs was
does not represent a random sample of summarized below. rated as either good or excellent with
households. 89.1% responding. The top reasons for
program participation are the location of
While the results of the online survey ONLINE SURVEY 1 the program or facility, reasonable fees,
echo those of the statistically-valid and times program is offered. On the
survey, they are not representative of the Overall Facility Use: The majority contrary, the top reasons that prevent
entire District community, but are still (99.7%) of survey respondents have respondents from using Park District
important to understand and combine visited a Park District park in the last year, program (or facilities) were the program
with the overall public input summary with most visiting parks monthly. Over or facility is not offered, program times
when looking at future decisions for the 93% rated the physical condition of parks are not convenient, or the class was full.
District. The first online survey had 374 as good or excellent. Wilder Park was
respondents. the most visited park, with Berens Park
and the Illinois Prairie Path following
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 43
Existing park improvements were ranked New potential amenities within the Park To address the Park Districts Indoor
based on a time-line for implementation. District also included the possibility of Sports Center, 42.26% of respondents
For example, if a respondent viewed a an Outdoor Nature Center. Respondents voted to construct new recreation/
park as an immediate priority, he/she were given 24 potential features and sports facility center at another
would choose High (0-1 years), Medium asked to choose three that they would park site. This was different than
(2-3 years), or Low (4-5 years). The twelve like to see. The six highest features that the preferred option for community
parks included in the survey ranking were chosen include: open house participants. Open house
were parks that scored below average Hiking Trails (50.13%) participants preferred option was the
during the initial park evaluations. Based Nature Based Play/Nature Themed acquire land and construct the new
on the weighted average scores of the Playground (33.07%) recreation / sports facility on the new
survey, the three highest priorities were: Open Air Shelter (27.30%) site.
East End Park (2.03) Water Feature (27.30%) In addition to park and facility priorities,
York Commons (2.02) Gardens (26.25%) the community provided the following
Plunkett Park (1.94) Ropes Course (26.25%) ideas regarding new or expanded
Existing facilities improvements were The last section of the online survey program offerings in three categories -
ranked in the same manner as the parks included questions regarding new Adult Fitness and Wellness, Community
(High, Medium, Low). The weighted and existing facilities. Respondents Events, and Adult Continuing Education.
average scores of the survey ranked the were asked to vote on their preferred
three highest priorities as: approach. Adult Fitness and Wellness
Wagner Community Center (2.26) To address the Small Recreation Classes, yoga, Zumba, walking, fitness
Smalley Pool Bath House (2.24) Buildings that are also currently used programs, Pilates, Adult programs,
Wilder Park Recreation Building for preschool programming (Butterfield Indoor and outdoor basketball courts,
(2.09) Park Recreation Building, Wilder Park ballet, Tennis, Nutrition, Dance,
Respondents were also asked to Recreation Building, Crestview Park swimming, walking club
consider the potential for new parks and Recreation Building, Eldridge Park
Community Events
amenities, including a potential dog park Recreation Building), 58.11% of all
site or strategy, and a potential outdoor respondents voted to Consolidate Concerts, music, more events, fireworks,
nature center. Community members preschool programming at three movies in the park, music in the park,
voted Eldridge Park as the best potential facilities one on the north, one nature programs, Free festivals outdoor
dog park site, however Salt Creek Park centrally-located, and one on the activities.
was a close second. Partnership and south. Demolish unused facilities.
land acquisition were third and fourth Adult Continuing Education
respectively. To address the Park Districts Senior
Center, 38.55% of responses voted Technology, College, Photography,
Potential Dog Park Sites Results to Renovate the recently acquired Health, CPR, Cooking, Computer
Eldridge Park (33.99%) 135 Palmer Drive Building. Relocate programs, Gardening, Foreign language
senior programming to 135 Palmer classes
Salt Creek Park (33.14%) Drive. Demolish The Abbey consider
Partnership (the Park District reusing and/or selling the property.
should look to partner with other
public or private agencies and To address the Park Districts Wagner
organizations to provide a dog Community Center, 51.42% of
park) (32.29%) respondents voted to Renovate and
expand Wagner Community Center
Land Acquisition (The Park with a gymnasium and multi-purpose
District should acquire new land rooms.
specifically for a dog park) (31.16%)
York Commons (24.36%)
The Abbey (16.43%)
programs, and facilities. 13, 2017, and April 10, 2017. The results In addition to The Abbey, the Wagner
of both the board interviews and Community Center and Courts Plus were
workshops are summarized in the also noted as facilities that could use
following paragraphs. improvements. Suggestions for Wagner
included improving the preschool rooms
and expanding and building a gym
COMMISSIONER (or two). Suggestions for Courts Plus
INTERVIEWS included re-purposing the racquetball
courts for something else, like gym
Indoor Recreation Facilities: The space, or expansion of the facilitys track
potential for a new indoor recreation and fitness facility. While not a physical
facility was on Commissioners minds improvement, nearly all Commissioners
during the planning process, especially suggested expanding program offerings
in the wake of the recently completed at Courts Plus.
Indoor Sports Facility study. While there
was consensus that this opportunity Partnerships: Each Commissioner
needs further study, there was not supported strengthening and expanding
consensus on the types of indoor spaces partnerships with public, private, and
for a new facility. Suggestions included non-profit agencies. They noted that
multi-purpose space, basketball, theyd like to avoid duplication, and find
volleyball, turf, ice, or a natatorium. The money to do things more collaboratively.
need for a gymnasium was mentioned Commissioners noted that as the
by multiple Commissioners, who noted comprehensive plan is implemented,
that existing available facilities are aging. theyd like to explore partnerships for
programs and facilities to best serve
As this opportunity is studied further, the community. Some agencies the
Commissioners would like to understand Commissioners noted as existing or
the communitys willingness to pay potential partners included the Elmhurst
and explore potential partnership Library, other Park Districts, Morton
opportunities for implementation. Arboretum, Botanic Gardens, Edwards
Some Commissioners supported / Elmhurst Healthcare, Villa Park, and
subsidizing the facility as needed, while School District 205.
others stated they prefer the facility
to be revenue-producing. Overall, Other: In addition to these three main
Commissioners agreed that any plan topics, Commissioners also discussed
for indoor recreation facilities must be communication improvements; praised
practical, realistic, and feasible. the Districts strong and efficient staff;
and noted the desire to alleviate park
deserts. Some provided ideas for
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 45
program improvements, specifically Strategic Plan Areas: BOARD WORKSHOP 2
for teens STEM, builders workshops, Customer: Customer Centered
maker spaces. Others noted the poor Following a review of the Boards initial
condition of existing fields, and the Financial: Fiscal Agility values with full-time staff and the Vision
high demand for field usage. They Internal Business: Improvement 2020 Work Group, the planning team
suggested improvements like different through Collaboration and facilitated a second workshop with the
soil, staffing changes for management, Innovation Board. This workshop, held on April 10,
and additional communication and 2017, included:
Growth & Development:
collaboration with the Districts Athletic Review and Discussion of Staff
Continuous Improvement through
Field Advisory Committee. Values, Vision and Mission
an Empowered Team
Confirm Overall EPD Values, Vision
BOARD WORKSHOP 1 and Mission Statements
Process and Findings: The Board Review Strategic Priorities (from
As a part of the Strategic Planning and leadership reviewed findings and staff work session)
process for the Elmhurst Park District, embarked upon a breakout exercise
the planning team engaged the Board Board Feedback / Consensus on
to determine key values. Each one was Strategic Priorities and Next Steps
and Management Team in a Strategic provided 5 blank sticky notes to note
Planning workshop on February 13, 2017. their values and stick them on the wall. The intent of the workshop was to share
Following this, a few compiled and the results of the strategic planning
The workshop included:
aggregated the values into overarching process as it related to the mission,
Community Needs Assessment ones based on similarity and overlap of vision, and values and confirm and
Survey (Statistically-Valid) Findings intent. finalize these items for the plan. In
Organizational Culture (Internal addition, the planning team also
The summary values identified (in no reviewed the strategic priorities as
Staff) Malcolm Baldrige Criteria
order of priority) were: developed by staff and the Board
Assessment
Empathy (teamwork, value for all, confirmed these priorities.
Visioning Work Session
excellence etc.)
Determining Organizational Values Process and Findings: The Board
Stewardship (powerful impact of reviewed findings and were led in a
Reviewing Vision and Mission nature, green, protect open space
Statements discussion to confirm the values, mission,
for future generations) vision, and strategic priorities.
The intent of the workshop was to share Safety (safety, safety, safety)
the internal customer (staff) and external Values
Community (collaboration,
customer (community) vision and needs community-minded, community The values, as confirmed by the Board,
for the future and allow the Board / focused) were:
leadership to use that information to
Customers (responsiveness, Fun
develop the road map for the future.
customer centric, people matter) Integrity
The previous Strategic Plan outlined the Fun (excitement, friendly, play- Customer Service Excellence
following: oriented) Community Focused
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 47
FULL-TIME STAFF AND VISION 2020
WORK GROUP WORKSHOPS
These focus groups were structured most frequently, followed by ideas related
as organized brain-storming sessions, to facilities, and so on).
wherein ideas were generated and also
ranked in terms of importance and Operations: Operational improvements are
potential for near term among the top priorities identified by staff
implementation. These at focus group meetings.
On December 13th and 14th, 2016 focus groups were aimed
Highest-ranked Priorities: Improve internal
the planning team hosted a series of at gathering ideas related
communications and operations: Improving
to both comprehensive
interviews and focus groups with Park and strategic planning,
communication between staff district-
wide is an important priority to many staff.
District staff. Interviews were hosted but focused more on
Also important is the Park District being
comprehensive planning
with department directors, and focus initiatives.
proactive instead of reactive. Staff would
also like to see ways to improve staffing
groups were hosted with other staff In addition to focus groups efficiency, for example by uniting similar
job functions under one department (e.g.
members. conducted in December, one
registration and programming).
additional all full-time staff
workshop was conducted on
Improve Staff Benefits: Many staff also feel
February 22, 2017. Twenty-six full-time staff
that it is important to consider ways to
from all departments and levels were also
improve staff benefits. Examples provided
engaged as part of the Vision 2020 Work
by participants include providing more full-
Group. This work group met four times
time job opportunities and offering higher
throughout the process. These meetings
wages for part-time staff to attract and
occurred on February 22, March 22, April
retain better employees. Many staff are also
19, and May 11, 2017. Summaries of the
interested in seeing more opportunities for
process, findings, and staff attendance are
training and professional development.
summarized in the following paragraphs.
Other Priorities: Invest in Technology: Across
all departments, staff members supported
DECEMBER FULL-TIME improving access to technology. Staff
STAFF FOCUS GROUPS would like to see better wi-fi access in Park
District parks and facilities, and some staff
The full-time staff focus group feedback is would like easier access to email. Many
listed below in five categories: operations, employees would like remote access or
facilities, parks, maintenance, and mobile workstations to help them work
recreation. from home. Ideas were also suggested for
These categories are listed in order of improving the registration system. Staff
relative priority, based on the frequency would like to see a parent portal like that
ideas in the category appeared across all offered by the school district, and would
focus group discussions (e.g. overall, ideas like the ability for customers to reserve
related to Park District operations appeared rental space through the registration
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 49
FEBRUARY ALL VISION 2020 WORK VISION 2020 WORK
FULL-TIME STAFF GROUP WORKSHOP 1 GROUP WORKSHOP 2
WORKSHOP
Following the full-time staff workshop, On March 22, 2017, the Vision 2020
Similar to the Boards workshop on the Vision 2020 Work Group met to Work group staff participated in a
February 13, 2017, the purpose of the review the preferred values from the second visioning workshop with the
full-time staff workshop was to review full-time staff meeting and the preferred planning team. Twenty-five staff were in
the scientific Community Survey and values developed by the Board. Twenty- attendance. The goal of the workshop
staff Organizational Culture survey six full-time staff members participated was to:
results and facilitate a brainstorming in this meeting and all departments and Review and Affirm Core Values
process to develop staffs initial draft organizational levels were represented. (Staff and Board Developed)
values. Once staff selected their initial Review and Revise (if needed)
Process and Findings: First, the
values, the planning team presented the Districts Vision and Mission
planning team led a discussion on the
Boards initial values and led a discussion Statements
values identified by the Board and
to compare the results. Sixty full-time Discuss and Develop Strategic
full-time staff, and asked the Vision
staff were in attendance Priorities (Overall and by Functional
2020 Work Group to narrow the values
down to 10. Once the top 10 values were Areas)
Process and Findings: During this
identified, the planning team wrote each Identify Next Steps for Board
meeting, staff were organized into
value on a post-it note for each table. review and Goals and Tactics
groups of 5-6 individuals. The planning
Each table then worked together to Development for 3-year Strategic
team facilitated a brainstorming
eliminate values, one by one, until they Plan
workshop where staff individually wrote
down their top 3-5 values on a sheet were left with their top five choices. In addition, in conjunction with District
of paper. Once they completed their staff, the planning team developed
individual brainstorming, the groups The planning team had each table Functional Areas for which strategic
were encouraged to discuss the values present their top five values and identify priorities and, subsequently, goals and
that each group member wrote down, which of the original 10 values were the tactics would be developed. These
and narrow their choices down to their easiest and hardest to eliminate. The functional areas are:
top three. These values were presented table below outlines the results of this
exercise. Land and Facilities
to the overall group, discussed, and Programs
categorized by similarities. Finally, each Communications (Internal and
staff member used stickers to vote for External)
their top values. Preferred values from Finance
the full-time staff workshop were: Internal Operations (Employee
Fun Relations, Technology etc.)
Integrity Visioning Process: During the process,
staff viewed a video by Simon Sinek
Community
and discussed Creating a World-Class
Excellence Organization and how the District
viewed itself in that context. A review
and comparison of Board and Staff
values followed.
Combined Values (Top 10) Overall Consensus (Top 5) Easiest to Eliminate Hardest to Eliminate
Fun Fun Safety Inclusive
Integrity Integrity Fiscal Responsibility Innovative
Customer Customer Service Excellence Collaboration
(Collaboration?)
Community Community Focused (Inclusive
included here)
Inclusive Innovative?
Innovative
Excellence
Collaboration
Safety
Fiscal Responsibility
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 51
VISION 2020 WORK Once the team provided an overview other options. This was not in line with
GROUP WORKSHOP 4 of the strategy matrix, staff dispersed the preferred strategy chosen by the
to review and participate in the self- community, who chose Eldridge Park as
The purpose of this fourth Vision 2020 guided interactive stations. Each theme the site for the dog park.
Work Group meeting was to review the (parks, facilities, programs, finance,
State of the District Report, draft strategy communications, internal operations) Outdoor Nature Center: Staff were
matrix, and brainstorm implementation had a station with multiple boards. asked to choose their top preferred
strategies. The meeting occurred on Within each station each goal had its amenities for an outdoor nature center
May 11, 2017, and twenty seven staff own board that listed the tactics to from a list of 25 different amenities. The
members attended. The State of the accomplish that goal. Staff were asked top preferred choices were:
District Report had been distributed to place dots on the boards to note Nature-based / Nature-themed Play
to staff for review in advance of this how high of a priority each tactic was. Hiking Trails
meeting , so the planning team covered The choices were high (start year 0-1), Open Air Shelter
the key findings from the report to medium (start year 2-3), or low (start year Gardens
provide the Work Group with the 4-5). If they had additional ideas, or felt Fishing Overlook
background behind the strategy matrix. that a goal was missing key tactics they Ropes Course
The full agenda included: could write their idea on post-it note Bike Course
and put it on the board. Some tactics Indoor Exhibits
State of the District Review
had additional activities associated with Water Feature
Parks and Facilities Scorecards
them as well. Amphitheater
Mission, Vision, Values Review
Draft Strategy Matrix Workshop Specifically, those tactics related to new Senior Center: Staff were asked to
Once the planning team covered the or improved indoor space and new choose their preferred option for a
key findings from the Analyze and outdoor amenities had additional boards new or improved senior center facility.
Engage phases, the team provided an where staff were asked to provide their The preferred option was to renovate
overview of the draft strategy matrix. preferences as to which strategy the 135 Palmer drive and relocate senior
Within each theme there were up to five District should take as it relates to the programming to the new facility. This
goals. These goals were the What we tactic / goal. was followed closely by renovating The
want to do. Under each goal there were Abbey.
various tactics for how to accomplish After weighting the results, 17 tactics
those goals. These tactics were the How rose to the top as the high priority.
were going to do it. This version of the These are listed in the table below.
strategy matrix combined the results
Dog Park: When asked which site or
of the April 19 staff workshop with the Wagner Community Center: Staff were
strategy for implementing a dog park,
planning teams internal visioning and asked to choose their preferred strategy
staff preferred land acquisition to all the
expertise. for improving Wagner Community
Small Recreation Buildings: Staff were The online staff survey results were the
asked to choose their preferred strategy same as the in-person staff workshop.
for the small recreation buildings that The preferred senior center strategy
was to renovate 135 Palmer Drive
currently serve as preschool and camp
and relocate senior programming
programming spaces. They were given
to the facility. The preferred Wagner
three options. The preferred strategy
Community Center strategy was to
was to repurpose and / or demolish
renovate and expand Wagner with a
the small recreation buildings and
gymnasium and multi-purpose rooms.
consolidate preschool programming
The preferred indoor recreation /
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 53
MANAGEMENT TEAM
WORKSHOPS
The nine management team MANAGEMENT TEAM Vision 2020 Work Group and confirm
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 55
MANAGEMENT TEAM
INTERVIEWS
As part of the comprehensive and INDOOR RECREATION / DOG PARK
strategic planning process, the SPORTS FACILITY
management team participated in There has been an increasing call for a
individual interviews with the planning Management staff noted that the desire dog park either a large, centralized
team. The planning team conducted for additional indoor recreation / sports facility or multiple smaller facilities. To
these interviews in October of 2016 facility space has been increasing in the implement this would require additional
and all management team members last few years. There is already a plan study and community outreach. Ideally,
participated in the process. The key to expand Courts Plus, but as that is an the site would already have parking and
topics discussed at the management enterprise / membership-based facility it wouldnt be adjacent to residential lots.
level were: may not serve all the community needs.
Indoor Recreation / Sports Facility There are also already limited resources
to fund and implement that expansion,
Dog Park much less an entirely new facility.
Maintaining and upgrading Space needs include gymnasium, turf,
existing parks and facilities classroom, and performing arts space.
If a new facility was developed, some
Limited resources
suggestions for a site include Eldridge or
Becoming a more digital and data Plunkett Parks.
driven organization
Staff training
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 57
PART-TIME STAFF WORKSHOPS &
ONLINE SURVEY
EXCELLENCE
0
20
40
60
80
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 59
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE
SURVEY
This assessment was based on the The seven Criteria Categories reviewed The summarized findings are color-
Baldrige Criteria for Performance include: coded based on the following:
Excellence. Organizations have utilized Leadership 33% or less responses Agree or
this tool for over 25 years to help Strongly Agree Red
accomplish their mission, improve Strategic Planning
results, and enhance competitiveness. Customer and Market Focus 34% - 66% of responses Agree or
The questionnaire is conveniently Strongly Agree Yellow
Measurement, Analysis and
organized into seven Criteria Categories 67% or higher responses Agree or
Knowledge Management
to evaluate employee sentiment District- Strongly Agree Green
wide. Workforce Focus
Process Management
One hundred and seventy (170) full-time,
part-time, and seasonal staff members Cultural Results
participated in this survey, which
provides a snapshot of current employee The results for each category are
opinion regarding the organizational provided in the following pages. These
culture at a point in time. These surveys are the key findings from each one of
were conducted from November the key areas and do not list every single
through early-December of 2016. question asked of the respondents.
Detailed information regarding the
entire set of responses are provided in
Appendix D: Supplemental Information.
38.8%
12.4%
Yes
Seasonal
One 35.5%
61.2%
Full-Time
hundred No
and seventy
52.1%
staff members Part-Time
participated in this
survey, which provides
a snapshot of current
employee opinion regarding the Employee Role
organizational culture at a point in Over two-thirds of employee
time. respondents work in the recreation
or enterprise services area within the
Park District. Thirteen percent work in
It is also important to note that the
facilities, 10% in other areas and 9% in
responses include a portion that
parks.
is undecided. Its unclear if those
responses are driven by a respondents
lack of knowledge pertaining to that
particular area or if they were simply
unsure of what they thought about the
Districts operations for that area.
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 61
FINDINGS
Leadership: Employees indicated a
high level of confidence in their senior
leadership. The ability and willingness of
the leadership to create a positive work
environment and to ensure alignment
with the organizational vision, mission,
and values are critical stepping stones
in the successful implementation
of any planning process. Those
surveyed indicated an opportunity
for improvement in continuing to ask
employees what they think.
ENGAGE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 63
Cultural Results: Among the seven
criteria categories, this section received
the lowest scores for staff feedback.
Although majority agree that the
organization is a good place to work,
there is a lack of confidence in the
agencys ability to remove things that
get in the way of progress and a general
unawareness of fiscal health among the
staff.
65
REGIONAL CONTEXT
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 67
2014-2018 Environmental The purpose of this study was to analyze Because this may be a joint effort
Strategic and Long Term the market, programmatic, financial, and between the City of Elmhurst and Park
Action Plan economic feasibility of a new Indoor District, funding sources that could
Environmental Policy Sports Facility for the purpose of driving be used to implement a new indoor
new revenue and economic impact to facility include General Obligation
Environmental Guidelines for Elmhurst, as well as enhancing rental, bonding, TIF district funding, hotel /
Plant Health Care and Pest practice and other special event facility motel tax, naming rights sales, public
Management alternatives available for area residents. agency partnerships, and public-private
Ozone Action Plan partnerships.
The types of indoor spaces evaluated in
2011 Attitude and Interest this study include: 2013-2017 Strategic Plan and Progress
Survey Reports
Indoor gymnasium facility
2007-2016 Comprehensive Indoor turf facility (soccer, football,
Plan A key function of the Board is to provide
lacrosse, baseball, softball, etc.) policy and strategic direction to the
Indoor pool / natatorium (50m) Elmhurst Park District. To that end,
2017-2026 Long-Range Capital Plan
Indoor ice arena since 1992, the Board along with staff
The Long-Range Capital Plan is a tool Local market conditions suggest that has committed to a Strategic Planning
the District uses to outline a time-line any envisioned consolidated indoor Process and in 2012 crafted the 2013-
for park and facility improvements and Elmhurst sports facility, designed 2017 Strategic Plan.
estimate budgetary needs. Current year appropriately, would allow the area to be
items are incorporated into the budget, more marketable in terms of tournament This plan was developed using
while future years are for planning and competitions. However, the market accumulated research including the
purposes only and are revisited and demand analysis suggests that strong 2007 Comprehensive Master Plan, 2009
revised each year. According to the local and non-local demand exists Indoor Facility Study, 2011 Attitude &
current Long-Range Capital Plan, the only for a gymnasium facility and ice Interest Survey, employee planning
Park District estimates that over the facility. In terms of indoor turf space and team recommendations, and staff and
next five years it needs to address an pool / natatorium, the market demand community feedback.
average of $6,480,765 per year on asset analysis suggestions only moderately
management, upgrades, and new / The Districts current strategic plan has
strong local and non-local demand.
major developments based on available four themes at its core:
Based on these conclusions, CSL
funding. Major investment for the 2017 conducted a feasibility analysis for three Customer Centered
fiscal year includes the purchase and space program scenarios (1) hard court Fiscal Agility
initial stages of abatement for the 135 sportsplex, (2) hard court sportsplex plus Improvement through
Palmer Drive site and facility. turf, and (3) ice complex. The analysis Collaboration and Innovation
revealed: Continuous Improvement through
In future years, the District plans to an Empowered Team
improve Berens, Salt Creek, Ben Allison, Scenario 2, hard court sportsplex
Van Voorst, and Conrad Fischer Parks, plus turf, generated the highest In addition to developing each of the
Wagner Community Center, and the potential for total attendance associated objectives under the umbrella
Crestview Recreation Building. and estimated nightly hotel room of the strategic theme, the Board and
rentals. staff developed the 2013-17 Strategic
2016 Indoor Sports Facility Market Work Plan, with initiatives and tactics
Scenarios 1 and 2 are estimated
Analysis and Financial Feasibility (action items).
to generate an operating profit
Study of approximately $149,000 and By December 31, 2016, the Park District
Completed by Conventions, Sports $270,000 annually, while Scenario had completed 20 of the 30 customer-
and Leisure International (CSL) in 2016, 3 is estimated to result in an annual centered tactics. Three were in progress
this joint City of Elmhurst-Park District operating loss. and two were deferred. Two of the
study evaluated the potential market Construction costs for each initiatives were deferred due to staff
and financial feasibility of a new Indoor scenario ranges between $22.8 to requirements related to learning the new
Sports Facility in Elmhurst. During this $32.2 million (2016 dollars). registration system.
planning process, potential user groups, Estimated output / revenues for
government / academic institution There are 21 tactics under the fiscal
a new indoor facility is estimated agility strategic theme. Nine have been
officials, local sports, tourism and to range between approx. $11.9
business leaders, league and tournament completed as of December 31, 2016,
and $16.5 million per year. This and seven were in progress. Four tactics
associations, and the community (via spending is estimated to support
an online survey) were asked to provide were deferred. The deferred tactics
between $5.9 and $8.2 million in address the initiative of developing
feedback to identify the potential market personal income and generate
demand. a comprehensive asset management
between 153 and 212 jobs. plan, which must be driven by the
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 69
In addition to the Environmental outcomes of the program plan process Determined the criteria for a
Policy, the Park District developed the to the Board at its May 27, 2015 meeting. program/service to be categorized
Environmental Guidelines for Plant as a social good to identify
Health Care and Pest Management, During 2015, staff completed the programs that should appropriately
which direct employees in the majority of items on the action plan and be fully subsidized.
production of healthy plants, identifying, will begin tracking and reporting cost
recovery levels to assess implementation Reviewed the Districts refund
monitoring, and studying existing policies and customer transaction
ecosystems, and effectively managing of the program plan. Outstanding action
plan items will be addressed in 2016-17 fees and improved refund policy
organisms that are injurious to humans, communications to customers such
plans, or animals. and are recorded under other relevant
initiatives in the 2016 and 2017 Strategic as adding more information to the
Finally, the Park District adopted Work Plans. Districts website. With the goal of
an Ozone Action Plan in 2013. This being customer centered, staff will
plan describes existing air quality Program Analysis Outcomes continue to review refund policies
measurements and policies put into and procedures based on the
District-wide Program Action Plan: capabilities of the new registration
place by the EPA and outlines how the
Program analysis action plan items system.
Park District can implement policies and
accomplished in 2014-15 include the
strategies to make a difference in the air Individual Program Area/Program
following:
quality for Elmhurst residents. Outcomes
Assessed the Districts cost
2013-2015 Program and Service recovery/subsidy goals for tax- To meet cost recovery goals, staff have
Analysis supported programs/services implemented the following program
based on actual recovery levels changes to address the recommended
Overview of Process and Action Planning and developed separate goals outcomes from the analysis of individual
During 2013 and 2014, staff conducted for enterprise programs/services program areas/programs:
a comprehensive assessment of the based on actual recovery levels and
Districts program portfolio utilizing the enterprise revenue policies. 2015
expertise and objectivity of facilitator Evaluated District services (e.g., Launched new enrichment
and trainer, Jamie Sabbach (110% rentals, massage, personal training, programs in dance, music, sports
Percent LLC) and Matthew Hickey mini-golf, etc.), utilizing the SAFS and gymnastics to extend the day
(ePRepSolutions LLC). Mr. Hickey process and created a strategy for of preschool participants in the
compiled the true cost of all District addressing the outcomes of the Sunbeams and Rainbows programs
services utilizing his PASS software, evaluation, including maintaining, at the Wagner Community Center.
which was critical for analyzing the improving and/or divesting Launched a new home school
financial viability of programs. Staff services for future sustainability. gymnastics program.
used Ms. Sabbach's Service Analysis Reviewed the Districts program
and Financial Strategies (SAFS) process Developed a recreation based
duplication philosophy, the early childhood summer camp for
to assess programs, which involved direction of community events and
compiling programming, market and ages three-to-five to compliment
fitness programs. the Discovery University summer
competition data for all programs
being reviewed along with the financial Investigated new program ideas. program at the Wagner Community
data from the PASS reports. Staff also Completed research on community Center.
developed a cost recovery model for demographics and previously Expanded the Funseekers Day
programs/services. identified potential underserved Camp and Before and After
populations such as the Hispanic Camp Care programs at the
After completion of the process, Ms. resident and the baby-boomer/ Eldridge Recreation Building to
Sabbach presented her final report adult market. Staff determined accommodate participants residing
to staff, which included a summary that the Hispanic market is too on the south side of Elmhurst.
of the outcomes of the process and small currently to justify increased
recommended next steps. Staff Launched new music/voice
spending or targeting since data program opportunities, including
developed a programming action does not indicate that this market
plan (with initiatives, time lines Group Guitar and Group Intro to
is underserved by the District. Voice.
and responsibilities) based on the Staff conducted a survey of the
recommendations in Ms. Sabbachs adult population, resulting in little Launched new youth dance/fitness
final report, strategic plan work plan response or interest for additional opportunities, including Zumbini
initiatives and by brainstorming services from the District, which and Zumba for Kids.
additional ideas to address the program indicates that their needs appear to Offered new senior programs such
plan outcomes. Ms. Sabbach and staff be met through other offerings in as Chair Yoga, dueling Piano Party,
presented an overview of and the the community. etc.
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 71
Overview of Process and Outcomes Overall, the Park District was regarded 2007-2016 Comprehensive Plan
favorably with constituents, with
In 2015, utilizing the same process as the programs parks, and facilities all Completed by Edwards and Kelcey in
program plan analysis, staff determined receiving high marks of satisfaction from May 2007, the five phases for creating
which services to review (e.g., rentals, respondents. Seventy percent (70%) the plan included data collection and
massage, personal training, mini-golf, of respondents felt that the portion of inventory, public participation, data
etc.), developed the survey to guide data their taxes that goes to the Park District analysis / assessment, visioning, and the
collection, piloted the review of two represents a good / excellent value given development of the final comprehensive
services to test the survey and address the level of service. Park and program plan document. The public participation
issues with data collection, compiled usage is high, with 85% of respondents phase included the collection of public
data and conducted the analysis of indicating they have used / visited a Park input through focus groups and public
each service collaboratively. Staff District facility in the past year and 41% meetings and a scientific District-wide
reviewed the service analysis outcomes indicating they have used a program in written survey in the spring of 2006. The
and determined the next steps for the past year. Berens Park (44%) was the Board approved the final Comprehensive
maintaining, improving or divesting most visited park while youth athletics, Plan Document in May of 2007.
District services for future sustainability. non-sports youth programs, and
This included the following: The 2007-2016 Comprehensive Plan
adult athletics were the most popular
recommendations were organized into
Increased pool rental prices for programs. The website was the primary
18 different categories. Each category
the 2016 season to improve cost source of Park District information,
contained a goal, foundation statement,
recovery levels (rentals were 93% followed closely by the program guide.
and series of recommendations
cost recovery with a goal of 110%). expressed as action items that were
The top reason for not participating in
Continued to raise prices Park District programs or not using parks aimed to help the Park District realize the
appropriately for picnic rentals and / facilities was a lack of need / interest. overarching goal.
garden plots which currently meet Most often, non-users reported that they
their cost recovery goals and can The categories and associated goals
dont have children in their household
offset the subsidy of other rentals, were as follows:
and the perception is that the Park
which are not reaching their goals. District is primarily for youth activities. In Administration: Provide
Continued to increase prices and this case, the Park District could improve comprehensive and innovative
institute a higher non-resident by communicating about adult program administrative services that meet
fee for Abbey rentals to meet cost offerings. the needs and expectations of Park
recovery goal. District residents and promote the
Respondents expressed interest in interests of the Park District in the
Continued to seek opportunities walking and biking trails, passive, community.
at The Hub to meet cost recovery open park space, and natural areas.
goals, including more aggressive Interagency Cooperation: Maximize
Respondents also expressed interest in
sales and selling products with a opportunities to work with other
group fitness space, an indoor swimming
higher return on investment along agencies and organizations
pool, and a walking or running track.
with decreasing expenses. to provide improved park and
None of the items; however, received
recreation services to the residents
Increased personal training and greater than 50% of respondents
of the Elmhurst Park District.
massage therapy fees by an indicating interest in the facility and 36%
average of 15% based on a price of respondents chose none or dont Financial Resources: Develop
analysis of competitors and to know. Overall, there was no consensus creative and responsible funding
improve cost recovery. about new park or facility additions. operations that generate financial
resources that are utilized
2011 Attitude And Interest Survey Finally, while 56% indicated that efficiently and equitably.
expanding or building additional indoor
In 2011, The Park District engaged Board / Staff Education: Maintain a
recreation space was important, 32%
RDResearch to conduct a community- well-educated staff that provides
said they are not willing to pay for it.
wide survey. This telephone survey was superior services, programming,
Indoor space was supported most often
based on 409 completed surveys with and administration.
by younger households, higher-income
heads of households in Elmhurst, Illinois. households, and those with children. Customer Service: Provide
Out of all respondents, 48% were male Most residents were sensitive to taxes customer service protocols that are
and 52% were female. The median age and further spending; however, the most friendly, consistent, and easily-
of respondents was 54.8 and 61% of tax-sensitive respondents were typically accessible to all.
respondent households did not have non-users. The survey indicated that Communications: Create
children. The median length of time communication with this group should effective communication sources
living in Elmhurst was 20 years and most be key. that provide comprehensive
(62%) were employed. information to the community in
an easy-to-understand and legible
manner.
72 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX A
Public Awareness: Enhance resident
awareness and knowledge of the
Elmhurst Park District to facilitate
greater understanding of operations,
programs, and opportunities.
Volunteers: Engage volunteers in a
variety of activities that will assist the
Park District in living its Mission and
realizing its goals.
Acquisition: Develop a funding source
to support the acquisition of new
lands and facilities to expand the open
space and natural areas, and provide
additional land or space to meet
programming, administrative, and
facility management needs.
Program Access: Provide flexible
program opportunities that are
available to the greatest cross-section
of Park District residents.
Programs: Provide diverse educational,
recreational, and fitness programming
opportunities that meet the changing
needs of Park District residents.
Health: Provide programs, services,
and facilities that encourage healthy
choices and lifestyles.
Environmental Education: Develop
programs in environmental topics
that engage the residents in natural
surroundings and promote a greater
understanding of the natural world.
Maintenance and Planning: Provide
proactive maintenance programs that
anticipate needs and reduce reactive
maintenance of parks and facilities.
Image: Develop a common image that
creates a distinct character unique to
the Elmhurst Park District.
Open Space and Historic Integrity:
Preserve and enhance open space,
natural areas, and the historical site
and architectural features of the parks.
Park & Facility Enhancement: Provide
parks and facilities that are state-of-
the-art and well-maintained, and
improve facilities on a regular basis to
keep up with new technologies and
District resident needs.
Capital Projects: Add new facilities and
redevelop existing park site to elevate
the quality and provide enhance
program opportunities.
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 73
3
2
1 4
5
6
LOCAL POLICY 7
CONTEXT
WARDS
The City of Elmhurst is divided into seven
wards. Each ward is represented by two
aldermen, who through the legislative
and policy setting responsibility of the
City Council, pass ordinances, approve
the budget; levy taxes; award contracts;
appoint certain city officers, committees,
While the Park Districts boundaries are and commissions; and direct the course of
government.
not contiguous to the City of Elmhursts Wards are outlined and identified by the
boundaries, they are all very similar and number in the map above.
TIF 5 TIF 4
'
(
&
%294
'
(
&
%
290
TIF 1
TIF 3
(%
'
&
% '
(
&
290 294
'
(
&
%
88
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 75
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
Elmhurst consists mostly of single- LAND USE AND As it relates to Park District properties,
these are zoned CR - Conservation /
family residential neighborhoods, ZONING Recreation. The CR district is designed to
preserve and protect large, open space
with higher-density residential Schools, parks, and institutional uses uses and to encourage the development
are well-integrated throughout the
uses concentrated in the community, while commercial areas of land for "open space" recreational
activities or conserve natural resources.
downtown area. are concentrated in nodes, typically
at major intersections. The greatest Permitted Uses: Land located in the CR
concentration of commercial land uses district shall be used for the following
is downtown. Office and industrial uses purposes only:
are concentrated along the northern and
western edges of the community, with Botanical gardens and arboretums
business districts dispersed throughout. Buildings and/or facilities owned,
operated or controlled by the City
Elmhurst is expected to remain a Cemeteries
suburban residential community in the Forest preserves, wildlife
future, but through the implementation reservations, and ecological
of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan, sanctuaries
the City of Elmhurst would like Parks and playgrounds
to incorporate a new mix of uses Public flood control projects
throughout the community wherever Zoological gardens
possible. For example, portions of Accessory uses and buildings,
Elmhursts commercial corridor are incidental to and on the same
already undergoing redevelopment zoning lot as a principal use
with contemporary retail and mixed use The following conditional uses may be
commercial spaces. This redevelopment allowed:
establishes a more competitive retail
alignment for the community, as well Cultural facilities, including
as enhances the Citys tax base. The libraries, museums, and similar
existing Land Use Map is found to the cultural facilities
left. Elementary schools
Junior high schools
The Future Land Use Framework is Senior high schools
intended to provide a blueprint of Colleges or universities
the future development pattern. The Golf courses and driving ranges,
land use plan is a policy guide and tennis centers, pitch and putt, and
works in conjunction with the Zoning similar
Ordinance, a regulatory tool that guides Government administration
implementation of the land use plan. buildings and facilities
The City of Elmhurst Zoning and Land Miniature golf courses
Use Maps can be found in the Appendix Nurseries, for the growing and sale
D. of trees and shrubbery
Source 5. City of Elmhurst Comprehensive Plan
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 77
NATURAL
FEATURES
Watersheds and Riparian
Corridors
Floodplain
Wetlands
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 79
COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE
Public parks and open spaces are fishing opportunities at the various
provided by multiple agencies in the lake, creek, and ponds within
Elmhurst community the Forest the property, and on-leash dogs
Preserve District of DuPage County, are welcome to accompany their
public and private School Districts, owners on the trails.
the Park District, and Elmhurst
College. Salt Creek Greenway Forest
Preserve is in southwest Elmhurst.
While all agencies provide open space, This 38.5-acre site is currently an
they do so in varying capacities. The undeveloped natural area that
Forest Preserve District aims to acquire, provides stormwater retention
preserve, protect, and restore the for the community. While largely
countys natural areas, while also undeveloped, there is access to the
providing opportunities for people to regional Salt Creek Greenway Trail from
connect with nature. They function the property.
primarily as an agency for conservation
land from, or has some sort of shared-
and preservation. The school districts
SCHOOLS AND use agreement with the Forest Preserve
primary function is to provide local
District, City of Elmhurst, School District
open space for school-sponsored COLLEGES 205, and Elmhurst College. In addition to
team athletics, while also allowing for
School District 205 operates 113.5 parks and open space, the Park District
public neighborhood use of the land
acres of open space within the operates Sugar Creek Golf Course, a
during after school and weekend hours.
Elmhurst community. The school nine-hole course located and shared
Finally, the Park Districts purpose is to
district provides a variety of active and with the Village of Villa Park.
provide public parks, open space, and
free or low-cost recreational program passive recreation opportunities for
opportunities to the community. the community, including playgrounds,
tennis courts, basketball courts, and PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
open spaces. Private school district In addition to public open space, the
FOREST PRESERVE sites provide 37.7 acres of open space community also has a limited number
for Elmhurst community residents. The of private open spaces at their disposal.
Within the Elmhurst Park District 48-acre campus of Elmhurst College is These include the Arlington Cemetery
boundary, the Forest Preserve District designated as a Level II Arboretum and is and the Maywood Sportmans Club.
operates 216.2 acres of open space. open to the public for passive recreation. Private open space totals 186.92 acres.
Cricket Creek Forest Preserve is in the
northwest portion of the District along The map to the right identifies all open
Salt Creek. Out of the forest preserves PARK DISTRICT space within the Elmhurst Park District
216.2 acres, 177.7 acres are in the Cricket community.
Creek Forest Preserve. This forest The Park District operates 457.9 acres
preserve features nearly two miles of of public open space. Out of the 457.9
flat crushed limestone trails and a link to acres, 153 acres, or 33%, is leased from
the regional Salt Creek Greenway Trail. It another public agency but managed by
also includes a 50-peron picnic shelter, the Park District. The Park District leases
Baseball / Softball
Horseshoe Court
Bocce Ball Court
Program Facility
Swimming Pool
Batting Cages
Tennis Court
Concessions
Playground
Skate Park
Trails (mi.)
Basketball
Volleyball
Memorial
Mini Golf
2
Sled Hill
Ice Rink
Storage
Leased
Owned
MINI PARKS
Crescent Park 0.6 1
Glos Memorial Park 1.0 1
Jaycee Tot Lot 0.6 1 1
Kiwanis Park 1.2 1
1.2 2.2
TOTAL 3.4
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Ben Allison Park 2.8 1 3 1 1 1 1
Conrad Fischer Park 4.9 10.6 1 2 1 1 3 3 2
Crestview Park 8.4 2.5 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1
Golden Meadows 5.3 0.8 1 2 1
Marjorie Davis Park 3.3 0.26 1 75 1 1 1 1 1 1
Pioneer Park 4.6 1 5 1 1 1
Salt Creek Park 10.0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2
Washington Park 3.3 1 2 1 2 1 1
Van Voorst Park 2.7 1 1 1 2
42.6 16.6
TOTAL 59.2
COMMUNITY PARKS
Berens Park 65.2 1.72 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 5 2 1 5 1 1 5 12 3 1
Butterfield Park 21.7 1.7 0.57 1 1 2 1 16 1 4 2 3
East End Park 13.2 1 1 4 1 3 2 1 2 2 1
Eldridge Park 38.7 5.0 1.5 1 2 1 8 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 1
Plunkett Park 16.0 0.44 1 1 1 2 4 1 3 1
Wilder Park 17.3 1.42 3 1 1 3 13 1 4
York Commons 11.6 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1
183.7 6.6
TOTAL 190.4
NATURAL AREAS
Wild Meadows Park 5.5 4
5.5 0.0
TOTAL 5.5
LINEAR PARKS
Maple Trail Woods 27.1 66.6 3
Sleepy Hollow Park 2.0 1
Wild Meadows Trace 25.3 32.0 7 1
54.3 98.6
TOTAL 152.9
SPECIAL USE PARKS
Sugar Creek Golf Course 17.7 29.0 1 1 1 9
17.7 29.0
TOTAL 46.7
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 83
DEMOGRAPHICS &
SOCIOECONOMIC
CONTEXT
The Demographic Analysis was utilized for projected 2026 and 2031
demographics.
According to U.S. Census reports, the
total number of households in the
provides an understanding This analysis is reflective of the total
target area has experienced a coinciding
upward trend, increasing from 16,185
of the population within population living in the Park District's
boundaries, and its key characteristics
in 2010 to 16,526 in 2016. The total
households are expected to continue to
Elmhurst Park District, such as age, income, race, and increase at this modest rate up to 17,551
ethnicity. Future projections are based
Illinois. on historical patterns. Unforeseen
households by 2031.
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 85
ACREAGE
The Acreage Level of Service analysis
aims to measure the minimum acres of
land required to provide recreational
opportunities and the amenities / facilities
required to support them. Historically,
NRPA recommended 10 acres per 1,000
PARK & FACILITY population, but as more information has
become available to park and recreation
LEVEL OF SERVICE
professionals, they saw the need to develop
context-sensitive benchmarking. Park
Metrics is the NRPAs online reporting tool
that allows agencies to compare their
offerings, operations, staffing, and other
The Level of Service (LOS) analysis evaluates how well features to comparable agencies within
the Districts parks, outdoor amenities, and indoor their state, region, or the nation. Agencies
recreation facilities compare to local, regional, and industry can compare themselves to others based on
benchmarks and attempt to gauge how well offerings serve population, budget, full-time employees,
the Elmhurst Park District community. and more. Park Metrics was used to produce
benchmarks for agencies with populations
Level of Service standards and recommendations provide between 40,000 and 50,000. (The Park
agency staff and officials with the information they need to District's population is 46,377).
respond to growing and changing communities and their
ever-changing needs. Its basic utility is evaluating whether
community assets meet the legal and / or economic
requirement of equity. According to the NRPA, a Level of In addition to Park Metrics, the planning
Service benchmark should be: team utilized regional benchmarks for
agencies in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin
practical and achievable; with populations between 40,000
equitable; and, and 50,000 compiled from previous
context-sensitive. projects completed by the planning
team. To develop Elmhurst Park Districts
Typically, four Level of Service standards (The Acreage Level recommended Level of Service benchmark,
of Service, the Distribution Level of Service, the Amenity the Park Metrics recommendations and
Level of Service, and the Facility Level of Service) are used to regional benchmarks were combined
measure the equity of park and facility offerings. In addition to produce the context-sensitive
to explaining the purpose, source and / or methodology recommendation found on the following
behind each Level of Service measure, the following pages.
information provides a snapshot of the Elmhurst Park
Districts recommended Level of Service.
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 87
ACREAGE
The Acreage Level of Active Recreation Space, displays the full
analysis.
Service analysis aims to The second measure of acreage level of
measure the minimum service is overall Park District-owned and
managed sites. This not only includes the
acres of land required Mini, Neighborhood, and Community
Parks but also the Natural Areas,
to provide recreational Linear Parks, and Special Use Parks.
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 89
DISTRIBUTION
The District is then divided into planning areas that are distinguished by barriers
such as roads, railroads, stream corridors, or other features that obstructed
walkability. There are 16 planning areas in the Elmhurst Park District which are
shown in the map to the right. Planning Area 12 has the largest population
at 11,965 residents while Planning Area 2 has the smallest population at 246
residents. In general, the Planning Areas on the south and east have the high
population densities.
The charts above summarize the results of the distribution analysis. Forty-two
percent of Park District residents live within 0.25-miles of a Mini, Neighborhood,
or Community Park while 64% live within a 0.5-mile of a Neighborhood or
Community Park. Eighty-seven percent of residents live with 1.0-mile of a
Community Park and, finally, overall park service is 98%. Nearly all residents live
within 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0-miles of a park site.
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 91
NEIGHBORHOOD
PARK
DISTRIBUTION
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 93
OVERALL PARK
DISTRIBUTION
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 95
AMENITIES
Amenity Level of Service is recommended benchmark is 10.8. The
District also has surpluses in tennis
measured by the quantity, courts (+14.31) and baseball / softball
fields (+10.76). The largest deficiencies
quality, and distribution occur in golf course (-7.77) and disc golf
courses (-7.24).
of individual recreational
offerings. STATE
Compared to state benchmarks, the
This analysis compares the Park District's District has the largest surplus of tennis
available amenities with local, state, and courts (+17.06). Most other amenities
national benchmarks. Please note, not are at or just slightly below state *plots
all amenities have benchmarking data benchmarks. The largest deficiency
for each level available. If there isn't data for the District, compared to state
available, the charts on the following benchmarks is for baseball / softball
pages will note "n/a" in the column. fields (-13.65). Other deficiencies include
picnic shelters / pavilions (-7.49) and
Local benchmarks were derived from existing trails (-4.59).
comparable DuPage County agencies
based on total population, tax rate, and
median income. Agencies used in this NATIONAL
comparison were Naperville, Wheaton,
Carol Stream, Lombard, Glen Ellyn, Compared to national benchmarks,
Addison, and Woodridge Park Districts. the District has the largest surplus
of community garden plots at 73.84
State benchmarks were derived from more community garden plots than
the 2015-2019 Illinois Statewide Open comparable agencies around the US. The
Space and Recreation Plan (SCORP) and District also has a surplus of rectangular
National benchmarks were derived multi-purpose fields (+25.14), tennis
from the NRPA Park Metrics database courts (+16.82), and baseball / softball
for agencies with populations between fields (+12.29).
40,000 and 50,000.
LOCAL BENCHMARKS
Compared to local benchmarks, the
District has the largest surplus of
rectangular multi-purpose fields. TOTAL AMENITIES (LESS
THAN OR EQUAL TO
DEFICIENCIES (AS
INDICATED BY SPECIFIC
The District has 29 fields, and the DISTRICT OFFERING) BENCHMARKS)
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 97
98 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX A
Based on the facilities assessed INDOOR SQUARE this indoor space is general recreation
and fitness space, 4.3% is senior
during this planning process, the FOOTAGE / center recreation space, and 5.2% is
Park District owns and operates RECREATION preschool space. Combined, the total
recreation square footage equates to
a total of 147,115 square feet of FACILITIES (BY TYPE) 2.0 square feet per person, equal to the
Chicagoland benchmark. Not all facilities
indoor space. Of this, 63.6% is The allocation of square footage
noted was determined by reviewing were assessed during this planning
dedicated to recreation, 23.0% is floor plans, visiting each facility, and process, so this analysis only reflects the
indoor square footage of those included.
corresponding with staff. The table
dedicated to support space such as on the following page outlines each These are listed on the following page.
restrooms and storage, and 13.4% facility, the total square footage per
administration, recreation, and support
is administration space. use, and the quality of the space. The
INDOOR RECREATION
grading system used is meant to give a FACILITIES (BY TYPE)
general idea of each facilitys condition
Indoor facility level of service was
at a 30,000 foot altitude. The grades
derived from NRPA's Park Metric
align with standard academic grading in
database for agencies with populations
the form of five letter grades. A being
between 40,000 and 50,000. The District
the highest and F the lowest. The grades
meets or exceeds NRPA benchmarks for
enable an agency to quickly identify
Senior Center, Walking / Running Track,
which facilities need more attention
and Fitness Center. Wagner Community
than others. It is not meant to represent
Center was included in this chart as the
a detailed facility assessment. The chart
single recreation / community center
on the following page also illustrates this
for the District. While the chart shows
information. This is the base information
a deficiency, the District does operate
used for indoor recreation facility and
ancillary recreation facilities throughout
square footage level of service analysis.
the District. These facilities, however,
have their limitations (e.g., square
SQUARE FOOTAGE footage, quality, etc.) as to what types of
Indoor square footage Level of Service recreation they are able to host.
is measured by the total square feet
The District does not provide every type
of indoor space, by facility type,
of facility listed in the chart, but that
per person. The regional
does not mean they have deficiencies
Chicagoland benchmark
for those facility types. This information,
is two (2) square feet of
combined with the community survey,
indoor recreation space
will reveal exactly what types of indoor
per person. This analysis
spaces the District should or should not
calculates only the space
be offering.
designated as recreation
space per the table on
the following page. The
District has
93,600 square
feet of indoor
recreation
space. Ninety
percent of
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 99
FACILITY INVENTORY
C- AVERAGE
2 135 Palmer / DuPage Medical Building* N/A N/A N/A
3 Butterfield Park Recreation Building 0 900 1,047
4 Crestview Park Recreation Building 0 2,100 600
5 Eldridge Park Recreation Building 0 1,900 700
6 Norman P. Smalley Bath House 0 0 3,500
7 The Abbey 500 4,000 500
8 Joanne B. Wagner Community Center 5,000 25,000 2,000
9 Wilder Park Recreation Building 0 1,200 600
Sub-Total 5,500 35,100 8,947
TOTAL SF / % OF TOTAL 49,547 / 33.7%
D - BELOW AVERAGE
10 Sugar Creek Golf Maintenance Building 158 0 1,867
11 Wilder Park Building (225 Prospect) 5,000 0 543
Sub-Total 5,158 0 2,410
TOTAL SF / % OF TOTAL 7,568 / 5.1%
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 101
NATIONAL RECREATION TRENDS
Information released by Sports & Fitness barriers to entry. The purpose of the report
Industry Associations (SFIA) is to establish levels of activity and identify
2016 Study of Sports, Fitness, key participatory trends in recreation across
The following summarizes the Sports & and Leisure Activities Topline the US.
Participation Report reveals
Fitness Industry Associations (SFIA) 2016 the most popular sport and These popular activities also have appeal
because of their social application. For
Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Activities recreational activities. Most
example, although fitness activities are
of these activities appeal
Topline Participation Report. to both young and old mainly self-directed, people enjoy walking
alike, can be done in most and biking with other individuals because it
environments, are enjoyed regardless of can offer a degree of camaraderie.
level of skill, and have minimal economic
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 103
activities have become popular due to NATIONAL TRENDS
an increased interest among people IN OUTDOOR
to improve their health by engaging in
an active lifestyle. These activities also
RECREATION
have very few barriers to entry, which Much like the general fitness activities,
provides a variety of options that are these activities encourage an active
relatively inexpensive to participate in lifestyle, can be performed individually
and can be performed by nearly anyone or with a group, and are not limited
with no time restrictions. by time restraints. In 2015, the most
popular activities, in terms of total
The most popular fitness activity by
participants, from the outdoor /
far is fitness walking, which had just
adventure recreation category include
over 109.8 million participants in 2015,
road bicycling (38.3 million), freshwater
which represents a 2.4% decrease
fishing (37.7 million), day hiking (37.2
from the previous year. Other leading
million), and camping within mile of
fitness activities based on total number
vehicle/home (27.7 million).
of participants include treadmill (50.4
million), running/jogging (48.5 million), From 2010-2015, outdoor / adventure
hand weights (42.8 million), stretching recreation activities that have
(35.8 million), and stationary cycling (35.6 undergone the largest increases were
million). adventure racing (136%), archery (33%),
BMX bicycling (29%), traditional climbing
Over the last five years, the activities
(28%), and backpacking overnight (26%).
growing most rapidly are non-traditional
Over the same time frame, activities
/ off-road triathlons (119%), trail running
declining most rapidly were in-line roller
(63%), traditional road triathlons (57%),
skating (-26%), camping within mile
high impact aerobics (41%), and yoga
of home/vehicle (-15%), and recreational
(20%). In the last year, activities with the
vehicle camping (-12%). More recently,
largest gains in participation included
activities growing most rapidly in the last
non-traditional / off-road triathlons
year were adventure racing (21%), BMX
(24%), traditional / road triathlons
bicycling (15%), traditional climbing (5%),
(13%), barre (12%), and trail running
and fly fishing (4%).
(8%). It should be noted that many
of the activities growing most rapidly
have a relatively low user base, which
allows for more drastic shifts in terms of
percentage. The recent decline in the
extremely popular activities of fitness
walking and running / jogging paired
with widespread growth in activities
with lower participation levels, may
suggest that those engaging in fitness
activities are actively looking for new
forms of exercise.
The following charts show sport The MPI measures the likelihood that activities have scores well above 100.
an adult resident of the study area will These overall high MPI scores show that
and leisure market potential data participate in certain activities when Elmhursts residents have rather strong
from ESRI. A Market Potential compared to the US National average. participation in recreational activities.
The National average is 100, therefore This becomes significant for when the
Index (MPI) measures the probable numbers below 100 would represent a Park District considers hosting special
demand for a product or service in lower than average participation rate,
and numbers above 100 would represent
events or starting up new programs;
giving it a strong tool to estimate
Elmhurst Park District. higher than average participation rate. resident attendance.
The study area is compared to the
national average in three categories As seen in the tables to the left, the
general sports, fitness, and outdoor following sport and leisure trends are
activity. most prevalent for residents within
Elmhurst Park District. The activities are
% Population Overall, Elmhurst Park District listed from highest to lowest number of
demonstrates above average market estimated participants amongst the Park
Activity Qty. EPD US MPI
potential in numerous categories; this Districts residents.
General Sports is particularly noticeable in the fitness
Golf 4,281 12.3% 9.2% 134 market potential table. Every activity High index numbers (100+) are
Basketball 2,728 7.8% 8.2% 95 in this category has an above average significant because they demonstrate
MPI score (100+). Looking at the other that there is a greater potential that
Tennis 1,849 5.3% 4.0% 134
two categories (general sports and residents of the service area will actively
Football 1,592 4.6% 4.7% 97 participate in programs offered by the
outdoor activity), though they all have
Baseball 1,488 4.3% 4.6% 93 a few activities with MPI scores below Park District.
Soccer 1,427 4.1% 3.8% 107 the national averages, a majority of the
Softball 1,199 3.4% 3.4% 100
Volleyball 1,037 3.0% 3.3% 92
Summary of Local Trends
Fitness
The service area exhibits above average market potential for sport and leisure activities
Walking 11,508 33.0% 26.6% 124
Top recreational activities in Elmhurst Park District compared to the national averages
Swimming 6,563 18.8% 15.4% 122
Participated in Bicycling (mountain)
Jogging 5,734 16.5% 13.2% 125
Participated in Golf
Weights 4,567 13.1% 9.9% 132 Participated in Yoga
Aerobics 3,716 10.7% 8.5% 126
Yoga 3,239 9.3% 7.0% 132
Pilates 1,144 3.3% 2.8% 119
Outdoor Activity
Hiking 4,847 13.9% 9.9% 140
Bicycling 4,461 12.8% 9.9% 139
(Road)
Fishing 3,706 10.6% 12.3% 89
(Fresh
water)
Canoe / 2,307 6.6% 5.5% 119
Kayaking
Bicycling 1,877 5.4% 3.9% 139
(Mountain)
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 105
RECREATION PROGRAM
ASSESSMENT
marketing efforts were areas that full. The following chart represents the
full ranking of barriers to participation.
could benefit from further review.
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 107
Marketing Preferences
ENTERPRISE
Enterprise programs are supported by
Lifecycle stages are also compared
self-generated revenues. Even though
Lifecycle Analysis to industry best practices. Enterprise
there is a goal to recover costs, the level
programs were assigned to three of
of cost recovery is different among all Programs can be assigned lifecycle the six stages (see below): growth,
the enterprise program areas. stages based on their current mature, and saturation. Compared
performance: to industry best practices, Elmhursts
Programs
Introduction = new program, Enterprise programs are below the
The Enterprise area is comprised of the modest participation benchmark for early stage programming
following core program areas: Take-off = rapid participation (introduction, take-off, and growth)
Tennis growth and over the benchmark for the mature
Growth = moderate, but consistent and end stages (saturation and decline).
Camps There is an opportunity to introduce
participation growth
Martial arts Mature = slow participation growth new programming in this area while
Saturated = minimal to no reprogramming saturated and mature
Kids Plus
participation growth, extreme programming to better align with
Personal training competition industry best practices.
Massage therapy Decline = declining participation).
Cost Recovery Classification
Wilder Mansion (special events)
The following breakdown represents
Golf
how Enterprise programs are priced.
Fitness Programs are categorized into one of
Dual Benefit Benefit accrued from the parks and Tennis-Beginner/intermediate Tennis-Beginner/intermediate
recreation service may be to both public Camps Camps
and private interests; level of subsidy Martial Arts Martial Arts
dependent upon level of public service. Kids Plus Kids Plus
Wilder Mansion Wilder Mansion
Golf-Beginner/intermediate Golf-Beginner/intermediate
Fitness Fitness
three categories based on perceived Service Providers: continue to be important programs for
benefit to the end user. This classification Score (tennis) the Elmhurst community, it is important
is then used to determine cost recovery to continue providing them, but staff
goals. The table above indicates the Midtown Athletic Club (tennis) should continue to monitor similar
classification as indicated by the Oak Brook Tennis Center (tennis) providers to understand market share
Districts cost recovery model. and market demand for services.
Hinsdale Racquet Club (tennis)
Partnerships HealthTrack (tennis) Community Preference
There are many programs that operate YMCA (misc.) The statistically-valid Community
without partnership involvement; Schools (camps, kids plus Survey asked residents if they (or their
however, of the programs reporting programs) household) had a need for a certain
partnerships in-place (4), two report program or facility and the degree in
Daycare providers (kids plus
somewhat ineffective partnerships while which their need is currently being met.
programs)
the other two report somewhat effective It should be noted that the degree in
partnerships. Churches (kids plus programs) which the need is met does not imply
Xsport (personal training) that the need is being addressed by the
Marketing And Communications Elmhurst Park District; rather, it refers
LA Fitness (personal training and to if their need is being met within the
Staff report existing marketing and fitness) community regardless of the service
communication efforts as somewhat
Massage Envy (massage therapy) provider.
effective to reaching targeted
audiences. Further examination is Pure Harmony Massage (massage Unmet need can be attributed to
warranted to understand how Enterprise therapy) many factors, such as a general lack
programs are marketed. Currently, the Western Acres (golf) of program/facility, pricing structure
most well-known marketing tool is the (whether individuals believe programs/
program brochure. In addition to the Fresh Meadow (golf)
facilities are priced too high),
brochure, marketing strategies include Meadowlark (golf) convenience (both available times and
websites, Facebook, fitness app, internal TopGolf (golf) location), or access (transportation,
banners and flyers, outdoor banners, accessibility issues, etc.). A Priority
and direct mail. There are many similar providers within Investment Rating (PIR) is attributed
the community for Enterprise programs. to facilities and programs based on
Similar Providers Sport facilities such as tennis centers the degree of community unmet need
An environmental scan for similar service and golf courses are prevalent along and community importance rating.
providers adds context to the breadth with private facilities that compete As a result, facilities and programs
of service within the planning area and with personal training and fitness are categorized into three tiers (high,
surrounding area. opportunities. Since tennis and golf medium, and low). High priority facilities
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 109
and programs indicate there should RECREATION the introduction stage. Compared
be a strong focus/attention placed to industry best practices, Elmhursts
here; whereas, low priority facilities Recreation programs are tax-supported Recreation programs are close to the
and programs do not necessitate more services. Similar to Enterprise programs, industry best practice benchmark
resources (at this time) from the Elmhurst Recreation programs have tiered ranges. However, there is an opportunity
Park District. cost recovery goals within the overall to continue maturing growing programs
Recreation program spectrum. while sunsetting, or reprogramming,
There is high support for indoor fitness saturated or declining programs.
facilities and programs within Elmhurst Programs
due to lack of indoor recreation space; Cost Recovery
however, there is lower support for The Recreation area is comprised of the
youth fitness and wellness programs following core program areas: The following breakdown represents
compared to adult programs. Lapidary how Recreation programs are priced.
Programs are categorized into
In terms of sports, golf ranked higher Special events one of three categories based on
than tennis in terms of both facilities Adult aquatics (fitness and Masters perceived benefit to the end user. This
and program offerings. Interestingly, swim) classification is then used to determine
pickleball is also ranked in the lower tier Adult general interest cost recovery goals. The cost recovery
but it is poised to grow and is currently table on the following page indicates
one of the countrys fastest growing Day trips the classification as indicated by the
sports. Senior Programming Districts cost recovery model.
Day camp Partnerships
Before and after school care
The majority of recreation programs
Gymnastics do not report utilizing partnerships;
Swim lessons however, the programs that do report
have very effective partnerships. Before
Softball
and after school programming and
Volleyball many cultural arts programs denote
Basketball having successful partnerships in-place.
It may be beneficial to seek partnerships
Soccer for private sports programs in order to
Karate become more of a facilitative service
Taekwondo provider instead of a direct program
provider.
Sports camp
Enterprise Area Observations
Cultural arts Marketing And Communications
After reviewing statistically-valid
Youth general interest Staff report varying success levels of
survey results and program-specific
Early childhood existing marketing and communication
data, the following observations and
efforts. For those programs that are
recommendations are offered:
Lifecycle Analysis considered very effective, the program
Enhanced partnerships should brochure, word of mouth, newsletters,
be sought for personal training, Programs can be assigned lifecycle social media, e-blasts, and bulletin
massage therapy, and other fitness stages based on their current boards are reported to be the mediums
and wellness-type programs as performance (Introduction = new most often used. For the programs
many organizations in the health program, modest participation; Take- that report no outreach, it is reported
industry partner in these areas. off = rapid participation growth; that these programs tend to either:
There are a lot of other service Growth = moderate, but consistent 1) sell themselves or 2) are for a niche
providers for golf and tennis participation growth; Mature = slow audience so marketing techniques are
facilities within the community; participation growth; Saturated = not necessary.
therefore, a regular examination of minimal to no participation growth,
extreme competition; Decline = declining Similar Providers
Level of Service (LOS) standards for
these facilities should inform the participation). Lifecycle stages are also
compared to industry best practices. An environmental scan for similar service
District as to what level to maintain providers adds context to the breadth
the current number of facilities. Recreation programs were assigned to of service within the planning area and
all lifecycle stages (as illustrated in the surrounding area.
chart on the following page) except
ANALYZE PHASE SUMMARY ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC PLAN | 111
Cost Definition Core Program Consultant Recommendation
Recovery
Classification
Public Basic parks and recreation services Drive in safety town
intended to be accessible and of Safety town trips/parties
benefit to all; supported wholly or Senior abbey luncheon
significantly by tax subsidies. Community concerts
Computer classes
Dual Benefit Benefit accrued from the parks and Lapidary classes Lapidary classes
recreation service may be to both Daddy daughter dance Daddy daughter dance
public and private interests; level Adult general interest Adult general interest
of subsidy dependent upon level of Day trips Day trips
public service. Cooperative day trips Cooperative day trips
Senior abbey luncheon Senior off-site luncheon
Senior off-site luncheon Senior programs misc.
Senior programs misc. Senior abbey membership
Senior abbey membership Funseekers day camp
Funseekers day camp Rec station before and after care
Rec station before and after care Recreational gymnastics
Recreational gymnastics Polar express storytime train
Polar express Litl dribblers
Litl dribblers Chicago Bulls and White Sox Academy
Chicago Bulls and White Sox Academy Preschool and youth sports
Taekwondo Sports camp
Preschool and youth sports Contractual sports programs
Sports camp Family open gym
Contractual sports programs Annual dance recital
Family open gym Impact dance company
Community concerts Adult dance program
Annual dance recital Early childhood dance
Impact dance company Tiny tunes & zumbini programs
Adult dance program Sunbeams and rainbows
Early childhood dance Huggy bears
Voice group classes Wee threes
Guitar and string lessons Tinker toddler time
Preschool piano lessons Kids great escape
Tiny tunes & zumbini programs Safety town
Sunbeams and rainbows Tickets to travel
Huggy bears Litl butterflies
Wee threes Big bug little bug
Tinker toddler time Princess/superhero camps
Kids great escape Discovery university/camp firefly
Safety town Co-rec volleyball
Tickets to travel
Litl butterflies
Big bug little bug
Princess/superhero camps
Discovery university/camp firefly
Drive in safety town
Private Exclusive benefit and gain received Gymnastics private lessons Gymnastics private lessons
by individual(s) and not by the Gymnastics open gym Gymnastics open gym
general public; individual usually Competitive gymnastics Spring softball
pays the full cost of service Spring softball Fall softball
provision. Fall softball Mens basketball
Co-rec volleyball Adult soccer
Mens basketball Karate (miura dojo)
Adult soccer Youth karate (ISKC)
Karate (miura dojo) Kids karate club
Youth karate (ISKC) Taekwondo
Kids karate club Private piano lessons
Private piano lessons Drum lessons
Drum lessons Glitzy girls/ultimate parties
Glitzy girls/ultimate parties Magic classes
Magic classes Mad science/lego
Mad science/lego Chess
Chess Competitive gymnastics
Computer classes Voice group classes
Safety town trips/parties Guitar and string lessons
Preschool piano lessons
Elmhurst Park District park lands This Park and Facilities Scorecard is an
effort to measure the quality of park and
numerous park sites. Site inspections
were performed in October 2016 and
and facilities are beloved and facility infrastructure and maintenance March 2017.
in order to ensure the highest level of
visible assets of the community. service possible for park users. To help provide context for weighting
There are over 20 public park The scorecard will help the Park District
the scoring of Elmhursts parks, the
project team used information about
spaces within Elmhurst Park to: community trends and priorities
gathered through the comprehensive
District, which are used by Understand the present state of
planning process. Information related to
Elmhursts public open spaces
community residents, school and facilities, and in time, trends and priorities was collected from
the following sources:
children, and sports teams year compare future conditions to past
performance; A review of community
round. Determine priorities for demographics;
improvements and provide A review of a statistically valid
direction for allocation of funds, community survey; and,
staff, and other resources; Site inspections
Communicate priorities internally
among employees and externally
to governing boards, citizen FACILITY SCORE
committees, and the public; METHODOLOGY
Measure the impact of open
The scores for each facility were
space infrastructure and facility
determined using a separate
investments and open space and
methodology. These scores were
facility maintenance efforts; and
developed during a series of facility
finally,
visits with the managing staff. The
Help Elmhurst residents to eight facility considerations are equally
understand how their local weighted and included the following:
neighborhood parks and facilities
Interior / Furniture / Finishes
are performing in comparison to
other parks in the District. HVAC (heating/ventilation/air-
conditioning)
Ultimately, the Park and Facilities
Plumbing / Fire Protection
Scorecard is intended to help guide
capital improvement plans, master Electrical
plans, and maintenance standards, Roof
helping Elmhurst Park District maintain
Building Exterior / Windows / Doors
and improve its park and facility
infrastructure. Security (cameras, lights, alarms)
ADA Compliance (Americans with
Disability Act)
PARK AND FEATURE
SCORE METHODOLOGY
To prepare the park and feature
scorecards, the project team conducted
rigorous field inspections of Elmhursts
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 115
INSPECTION OF PARKS DATA ANALYSIS an overall park score. For example, if a
AND FEATURES park has a soccer field and a baseball
To ensure that park scores reflect the diamond, those scores would be
In all, the project team evaluated 24 viewpoint of an average Elmhurst citizen, averaged to create an Athletic Field score
parks within Elmhurst Park District. weighting was applied to each feature for the park. This score was combined
Inspections did NOT include: score when producing individual park with the other average area scores for
scores based on: that park to create an overall park score.
Parks and / or features closed for
capital improvements throughout Local and National recreation
the survey period; trends and best practices; and,
PARK AND FEATURE
Community survey priorities and
Park properties that have not been SCORECARD RESULTS
developed for public use; and, results.
Seasonal facilities not available Park System Score
Each feature area was assigned a factor
for review during the inspection based on community survey results Elmhurst Park District parks fared
period (e.g. outdoor ice rinks). regarding amenities level of importance. reasonably well, with an overall system
The amenities that were rated as most score of 79, C+ (Fair) due to half of parks
Each park was inspected based on ten
important are weighted heavier in park (50%) receiving a rating of Good or
park feature types. Feature types were
scores than the areas that were rated higher.
chosen to represent different features
of lower importance. Although water
commonly found in Elmhurst Park Feature Scores Analysis
fountains and bathrooms were not
District parks, including:
included in the survey question, data
Athletic Fields (soccer / football and responses from similar communities Half of individual park features scored
/ lacrosse fields and baseball / were used to assign those two amenities only Fair or Poor overall. Only 5 out
softball diamonds) a weight factor that we would expect to of 10 features received a B- (Good)
fit for the Elmhurst Park District as well. rating or higher, and no single feature
Athletic Courts (including tennis, class received an A (Excellent) rating.
basketball, volleyball and bocce The lowest scores were for playgrounds
Feature weighting was also
ball courts) (C+), athletic fields (C+), seating areas (C+)
implemented to help alleviate issues that
Playgrounds arise with smaller parks that may only athletic courts (C+), and greenspaces
Trails and Paths (including City- house a few features, so that a parking (C+). Athletic fields and courts suffered
owned sidewalks) lot or a drinking fountain doesnt count from deficiencies in fencing, seating,
as much as something that matters more and surfacing. Playgrounds and seating
Seating Areas (picnic area, facing to people during their actual visit, such areas suffered from deficiencies in
group of benches) as a playground or restroom. Conversely, natural debris, surfacing and fencing.
Passive Green Spaces scores are calculated to ensure that
no individual feature area or park is Individual Park Scores Analysis
Natural Areas (including
community gardens) penalized because it lacked any given
A little less than half of Elmhurst Park
feature (such as an athletic court).
Restrooms District parks fared only Fair, with 46%
The data collection and subsequent scoring a C+ or below (33.3% with fair
Drinking Fountains scores and 12.5% with poor scores). Still,
analysis resulted in three tiers of scoring
Parking Lots for Elmhurst parks: 54% of parks received a rating of Good.
Park features were inspected based on: Facility Scores Analysis
Park System Score Individual park
Missing items (toilet paper, storage scores were averaged together to create
bin, lights, etc.) Of the eleven facilities included as part
an overall system score.
of the facility assessment only Courts
Functionality Plus scored a B, while eight facilities
Feature Scores All individual feature
Deterioration scores were averaged with other feature (73%) received a C grade. Two facilities
scores of the same type throughout scored D grades, highlighting their
Seating, fencing, lighting and
the Elmhurst Park District to arrive at immediate need and attention for
landscaping
an overall feature score. For example, improvement. These included the Sugar
Water bodies (lagoons) Creek Golf Maintenance Building and
inspection results from all basketball
Surface courts, tennis courts, and volleyball the Wilder Park Former Administration
courts were combined to produce a Building. The maintenance facility
Litter requires replacement and the second,
District-wide Athletic Court score.
Natural debris a historic structure, requires a facility
Vandalism Individual Park Scores Average area assessment and reuse study to
scores within individual parks are determine related costs and best uses.
Safety hazards combined and weighted to produce
116 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 117
C+
OVERALL SYSTEM
PARK SCORECARD SCORE: 79
SUMMARY
Park Score
Distribution
Scores Grade Condition 12.5% D Overall, Elmhurst Park
100-97 A+ Excellent District parks fared
96-93 A Excellent
only Fair, with 46%
92-90 A- Excellent 14% D scoring a C or below.
89-87 B+ Good
86-83 B Good Still, 54% of parks
82-80 B- Good 45% B
54.2% received a rating of
79-77 C+ Fair
76-73 C Fair 33.3% B Good, however the
72-70 C- Fair
C 41% C average overall system
69-67 D+ Poor score is a C+ (Fair).
66-63 D Poor
62-60 D- Poor
59 & below F Failing
A (Excellent) C (Fair) F (Failing)
B (Good) D (Poor)
Overall Park
Feature Scores
Only 5 out of 10 features
84
84
83
82
78
78
79
78
77
81
Excellent
received a B- (Good) rating
or higher, and no single Good
Greenspace
Natural Areas
Paths
Playgrounds
Restrooms
Seating Areas
Athletic Fields
D r i n k i n g Fo u n t a i n s
Parking Lots
or lower.
Athletic fields suffered
mainly from deficiencies
in fencing, seating, and
surfacing.
118 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
Highest Ranked Features High-scoring examples of
System-wide existing park features.
Athletic Field at
Drinking Fountain at Golden Meadows Athletic Court at
Butterfield Park (100) (100) Wilder Park (89)
Athletic Field at
Parking Lot at Salt Playground at Conrad Fischer Park Greenspace at Wild
Creek Park (49) Plunkett Park (55) (44) Meadows Trace (49)
Low-scoring examples of park features. These examples were chosen because they
represent features with an especially low score and ranking.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 119
WHATS NEXT?
Overall, a little more than half of the every issue immediately. Instead, these
parks were rated as good, which issues should remain top of mind as staff
demonstrates that while review park maintenance standards,
these spaces are being equipment replacement schedules, and
Based on inspection results, used and experiencing develop future park improvements and
addressing the following areas wear and tear, the capital designs, resulting in a long-term and
improvements and open proactive approach. For the following
will have the greatest impact on space maintenance the Park issues most requiring attention that can
improving park quality system-wide. District invests in, result in
an overall quality park and
be addressed over the next several years,
its important that a balanced approach
facility system. is taken that allows current operations to
continue. Otherwise the agency may see
In general: improvements in the areas listed below
Few functionality issues found while allowing other areas to decline.
nothing to be concerned about.
In general, equipment found within
Few repair/maintenance issues parks was in good condition and
found that mainly consisted of did not show any major signs of
trimmed branches that had been damage or deterioration. When it
left behind or had not been picked was found, it was often minor issues
up yet. with signage, trash cans, etc. The
Few incidents of vandalism found only exceptions to this were drinking
that mainly consisted of spray paint fountains and grills where rust and
and scratches/etching. deterioration was more common.
Few safety issues found that Seating issues were found in all
mainly consisted of beer/alcohol areas, but especially at athletic fields.
cans and bottles and vegetation Repainting/refinishing benches
issues (including mushrooms). and identifying athletic field metal
benches and bleachers that require
replacement is recommended as a
ISSUES MOST first step to address seating issues.
REQUIRING ATTENTION
The majority of fencing in the park
Based on inspection results, addressing system had some sort of issue,
the following areas will have the greatest with half of those issues rated as
impact on improving park quality noticeable or worse. The most
system-wide. This is not meant to common issues were simply a
serve as a list of to-do items, as it is not result of wear and tear and age and
practical nor cost-effective to address included rust/corrosion, painting
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 121
T
RAF
D
122 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
FEATURE
SCORECARDS
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 123
C+ SCORE: 78
ATHLETIC COURTS
a+0+100+14+0+37+21+25+0+22+0+29+11+22+0+1
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 125
C+ SCORE: 77
ATHLETIC FIELDS
a+0+100+20+0+24+34+42+5+10+0+53+11+34+1+1
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
Soccer Field at Conrad Fischer Park Soccer Field at Ben Allison Park
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 127
B
SCORE: 84
DRINKING FOUNTAINS
a+0+100+2+14+37+0+0+0+0+0+20+2+18+0+0
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
D r i n k i n g Fo u n t a i n s N o t e s
All individual drinking fountains in a public open space, including
associated surfacing and equipment.
Drinking Fountain at East End Park Drinking Fountain at Salt Creek Park
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 129
C+ SCORE: 79
PASSIVE GREENSPACES
a+0+100+6+67+10+41+48+25+31+56+33+11+30+2+2
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 131
B
SCORE: 84
NATURAL AREAS
a+0+100+11+0+34+0+34+0+20+34+13+34+26+0+6
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
T
AF Area at Eldridge Park
Natural Areas scored an 84 due to the presence of litter and
Natural
DR natural debris, as well as some fencing and deterioration issues
present.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 133
B- SCORE: 81
PARKING LOTS
a+0+100+8+0+15+34+39+3+26+0+51+8+22+0+0
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
The Elmhurst Park District Parking Lots score (81) could have been
higher without the negative impacts from seating, fencing and
T
AF Park Parking Lot
surfacing issues.
East End
DR
134 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 135
B
SCORE: 83
a+0+100+14+0+7+17+39+9+21+67+32+12+28+1+3
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
PathsF
T The Paths and Sidewalks score was lower due to fencing issues
R A at Glos Memorial Park
D seen throughout the park system. Paths and sidewalks that are
located adjacent to water bodies (lagoons) also had major issues.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 137
C
SCORE: 78
PLAYGROUNDS
a+0+100+20+2+32+23+20+0+32+0+44+22+49+10+7
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
Playgrounds Notes
All playgrounds in a public open space, including accompanying
surfacing, fencing, seating, lighting, landscaping, signage, and
other play equipment.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 139
B- SCORE: 82
RESTROOMS
a+0+100+37+12+31+0+0+0+0+0+42+24+12+9+6
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
Restrooms Notes
All public restrooms open to park visitors on a daily basis,
including signage and accompanying equipment.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 141
C+ SCORE: 78
SEATING AREAS
a+0+100+30+2+34+36+56+0+18+0+20+19+33+11+5
Issues Observed
Fu n c t i o n a l i t y I s s u e s
Deterioration Issues
Seating Issues
Fe n c i n g I s s u e s
Lighting Issues
Landscaping Issues
Wa te r B o d i e s I ss u e s
Surface Issues
Litter Issues
Va n d a l i s m I s s u e s
Noticeable
Critical
Seating Area at Wild Meadows Trace Seating Area at Ben Allison Park
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 143
AFT
DR
144 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK
SCORECARDS
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 145
B
SCORE: 84
a+0+75+0+0+0+89+93+71+0+84+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Ben Allison Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 75
Multi-Use Fields 1
Ben Allison Park scored a good score of 84 reflecting high Restrooms n/a n/a
Greenspace and Paths scores. This Park score did not receive an Seating Areas 1 84
excellent (A) due to a fair Athletic Field score (75) and an even
Special Amenities: Temporary/Portable Restroom, Sled
lower Playground score (71). Both Athletic Fields and Playgrounds
Hill
are experiencing surfacing issues.
AFT
DR
146 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Baseball diamond surface issues at Ben Allison Park. Surface issues at Ben Allison sled hill and soccer field.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 147
B+ SCORE: 89
BERENS PARK
Location: 493 N Oaklawn Avenue
Pa r k Ty p e : Co m m u n i t y Pa r k
Size: 65.2 acres
Owned: 65.2 acres
a+73+71+97+84+79+80+85+88+88+79+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Berens Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 85
50 Basketball Courts 1
Tennis Courts 12
Volleyball Courts 3
0
Bocce Ball Courts n/a
AT H L E T I C C O U R T S
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 86
Multi-Use Fields 5
Drinking Fountains 3 98
Site Description
Natural Areas 3 89
The largest community park in Elmhurst, Berens Park features
football and soccer fields, five lighted baseball diamonds, three Community Garden
sand volleyball courts, a walking/running path, two playgrounds, Parking Lots 3 85
two synthetic turf fields, a sled hill and The Hub, an outdoor family
Passive Greenspaces 2 89
entertainment complex consisting of a miniature golf course, spray
ground and batting cages. Paths and Sidewalks 5 92
Playgrounds 2 88
Berens Park received a B+ (89) for an overall park score. With
excellent scores for its drinking fountain, paths, and restrooms, Restrooms 3 90
Berens Park had overall good scores. However, many of the tennis Seating Areas 2 84
courts are experiencing surfacing issues.
Special Amenities: Miniature Golf, Sled Hill, Batting
Cages, Splashpad/Spray Ground.
AFT
DR
148 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Playground at the southwest side of Berens Park. Tennis courts at Berens Park.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 149
B
SCORE: 83
BUTTERFIELD PARK
Lo c at i o n : 3 8 5 E. Va n B u re n St re e t
Pa r k Ty p e : Co m m u n i t y Pa r k
Size: 23.4 acres
Owned: 21.7 acres
a+0+70+100+0+96+77+87+93+70+72+
Leased: 1.7 acres
100 Butterfield Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 70
Multi-Use Fields 2
Surface issues and safety hazards at Butterfield Park greenspace. Restroom wear and tear at Butterfield Park.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 151
D
SCORE: 65
a+68+68+64+0+0+83+64+49+0+0+
Leased: 10.6 acres
100 Conrad Fischer Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 68
50 Basketball Courts n/a
Tennis Courts 2
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 68
Multi-Use Fields 3
Drinking Fountains 1 64
Site Description
Natural Areas n/a n/a
The original property belonged to the Fischer family, German
immigrants who settled in the area in 1836. Five acres of land Community Garden
was originally purchased in 1966 and development began in 1967. Parking Lots n/a n/a
The park is adjacent to Conrad Fischer Elementary School and
Passive Greenspaces 2 83
Churchville Middle School. In 2000, a master plan and playground
design was developed and approved, adding ADA-accessible Paths and Sidewalks 2 64
playground equipment, developing a pathway, and linking the
Playgrounds 1 49
neighborhood to the School and Park.
Restrooms n/a n/a
Conrad Fischer Park received a poor score (65). Multiple features Seating Areas n/a n/a
within the Park (including tennis courts, athletic fields, drinking
Special Amenities: Temporary/Portable Restroom, Roller
fountain, paths and sidewalks, and playground) contributed to the
Hockey/In-line Rink
low overall park score. Functionality, surface, and deterioration
issues were prominent at Conrad Fischer Park.
AFT
DR
152 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Water pressure and rust issues with drinking fountain at Conrad Cracked concrete and woodchip distribution issues at
Fischer Park. Conrad Fischer Park playground.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 153
C+ SCORE: 79
CRESCENT PARK
Loc ation: R idge Avenue and Fair Avenue
Pa r k Ty p e : M i n i Pa r k
Size: 0.6 acres
Owned: 0.6 acres
a+0+0+0+0+0+79+0+0+0+0+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Crescent Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Passive Greenspaces 1 79
Crescent Park received a fair score (79) based solely on its
passive greenspace, which includes a seating amenity within the Paths and Sidewalks n/a n/a
greenspace. Landscaping issues (such as tree stumps and large
Playgrounds n/a n/a
divots) contributed to the fair score.
Restrooms n/a n/a
AFT
DR
154 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 155
C
SCORE: 74
CRESTVIEW PARK
Location: 245 Crestview Avenue
Pa r k Ty p e : N e i g h b o r h o o d Pa r k
Size: 10.9 acres
Owned: 8.4 acres
a+67+77+64+0+87+74+82+70+0+66+
Leased: 2.5 acres
100 Crestview Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 67
50 Basketball Courts 1
Tennis Courts 1
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 77
Multi-Use Fields 2
Drinking Fountains 1 64
Site Description
Natural Areas n/a n/a
Crestview Park opened in 1967. The property was originally
purchased in 1963 and named after its previous occupant, Community Garden
Crestview School, which was 7.47 acres. Additional acreage was Parking Lots 1 87
purchased from the Elmhurst School District 205 through OSLAD
Passive Greenspaces 3 74
funds in 1971 and 1980. In a combined effort by the Park District,
homeowners association, and community clubs, the Crestview Paths and Sidewalks 1 82
recreation building was built and dedicated in 1970, with an
Playgrounds 1 70
addition built in 1975. A playground was built in 1989 and two
tennis courts were converted to roller hockey courts in the late Restrooms n/a n/a
1990s. The playground was renovated in 2005. Crestview Park Seating Areas 1 66
includes a treehouse-themed playground with multiple towers.
Special Amenities: Temporary/Portable Restroom, Roller
Hockey/In-line Rink, Sled Hill
Crestview Park scored fair (74). Its parking lot scored reasonably
well; however, low scores for its drinking fountain and athletic
courts resulted in the low overall park score. Rust, mold, and
deterioration played a major role in the scoring of these features. Date Surveyed: October 18, 2016
AFT
DR
156 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Mold and deterioration at Crestview Park playground fence. Rusted grill at Crestview Park seating area.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 157
B
SCORE: 83
a+87+73+90+0+88+77+85+69+74+73+
Leased: 0 acres
100 East End Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 87
50 Basketball Courts 2
Tennis Courts 2
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Pickleball/Tennis Courts 1
Athletic Fields 73
Multi-Use Fields 2
Drinking Fountains 2 90
Site Description
Natural Areas n/a n/a
East End Park is perhaps best known for East End Pool, but it also
features a playground, three baseball diamonds, a soccer field, Community Garden
three lighted tennis courts, a pickleball court, lighted basketball Parking Lots 3 88
courts and a concession stand. It is also host to the York High
Passive Greenspaces 4 77
School boys cross country teams home course.
Paths and Sidewalks 1 85
East End Park received an overall score of 83. Along with surfacing
Playgrounds 1 96
issues at many of the park features, the seating areas scored low
due to safety hazards. Additionally, the restrooms and athletic Restrooms 1 74
fields scored low Cs. The drinking fountains and the excellent Seating Areas 2 73
playground helped East End Park to its overall good score.
Special Amenities: Swimming Pool
AFT
DR
158 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Safety hazards at East End Park baseball diamond bleachers. Playground at East End Park.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 159
B- SCORE: 81
ELDRIDGE PARK
Location: 363 W Commonwealth Lane
Pa r k Ty p e : Co m m u n i t y Pa r k
Size: 43.7 acres
Owned: 38.7 acres
a+83+78+75+89+85+82+85+78+0+68+
Leased: 5 acres
100 Eldridge Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 83
50 Basketball Courts 2
Tennis Courts 1
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Pickleball/Tennis Courts 1
Athletic Fields 78
Multi-Use Fields 5
Drinking Fountains 1 75
Site Description
Natural Areas 1 89
Eldridge Park hosts two playgrounds, a lagoon, sled hill, soccer
field, baseball diamond, tennis courts, basketball courts, a roller Community Garden
hockey court, butterfly garden, and the Eldridge Park Recreation Parking Lots 2 85
Building. A 3/4 mile path winding around the perimeter of the park
Passive Greenspaces 7 82
serves as a link to Salt Creek Greenway Trail, and a canoe launch
offers boaters access to Salt Creek on the northeast corner of the Paths and Sidewalks 12 85
park.
Playgrounds 2 78
Eldridge Park scored a low B (81) overall. This score resulted from Restrooms n/a n/a
good scores for its paths and sidewalks, parking lots, natural Seating Areas 1 68
areas, and athletic courts offset with its poorly scored seating
Special Amenities: Temporary/Portable Restrooms, Ice
areas. Additionally, the athletic fields suffer from drainage issues,
Rink, Roller Hockey/In-line Rink, Sled Hill, Boat/Canoe
hindering the quality of the surface areas. Launch Ramp
DR
160 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Surface seating area at Eldridge Park Baseball Field. Drainage issues at Eldridge Park Baseball Field.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 161
B
SCORE: 84
a+0+0+100+0+0+67+85+0+0+0+
Leased: 1 acres
100 Glos Memorial Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
AFT
DR
162 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Exterior path at Glos Memorial Park. Bench furnishing deterioration at Glos Memorial Park.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 163
B
SCORE: 84
GOLDEN MEADOWS
Location: South ends of Caroline and Hampshire
Pa r k Ty p e : N e i g h b o r h o o d Pa r k
Size: 6.1 acres
Owned: 5.3 acres
a+0+100+0+0+88+69+0+0+0+0+
Leased: 0.8 acres
100 Golden Meadows Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Multi-Use Fields 1
AFT
DR
164 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Tree branch safety hazard at Golden Meadows Park. Golden Meadows Park open space.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 165
C+ SCORE: 79
a+0+0+0+0+0+82+79+77+0+0+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Jaycee Tot Lot Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
AFT
DR
166 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Landscaping issues at Jaycee Tot Lot. Maintenance issues with the Jaycee Tot Lot playground
equipment.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 167
C
SCORE: 76
KIWANIS PARK
Location: E Madison Street and Stratford Avenue
Pa r k Ty p e : M i n i Pa r k
Size: 1.2 acres
Owned: 0 acres
a+0+0+0+0+0+70+78+0+0+0+
Leased: 1.2 acres
100 Kiwanis Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
AFT
DR
168 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Rusted trash receptacle at Kiwanis Park. Bench updates and finishing needed at Kiwanis Park.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 169
B- SCORE: 81
a+0+0+0+63+0+75+91+0+0+84+
Leased: 66.6 acres
100 Maple Trail Woods Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
AFT
DR
170 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 171
B
SCORE: 84
a+76+79+92+0+73+77+89+84+0+0+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Marjorie Davis Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 76
50 Basketball Courts 1
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 79
Multi-Use Fields 1
Drinking Fountains 1 92
Site Description
Natural Areas n/a n/a
The park land was purchased in November 1979 (with assistance
from the City of Elmhurst) from the Elmhurst School District 205 Community Garden
and developed in 1980. The park was dedicated on September 26, Parking Lots 1 73
1981 and named after Marjorie Davis, a dedicated teacher who
Passive Greenspaces 1 77
taught at Roosevelt School for over 30 years. In 2009, the park
was updated to meet ADA standards and the changing needs of Paths and Sidewalks 1 89
patrons.
Playgrounds 1 84
Marjorie Davis Park received a good score of 84. Issues at the Park Restrooms n/a n/a
include leakage at the drinking fountain, repairs needed at the Seating Areas n/a n/a
athletic courts, and parking lot surfaces. Overall, the park scored
Special Amenities: Temporary/Portable Restroom
well.
AFT
DR
172 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Damaged basketball net at Marjorie Davis Park. Damaged equipment at Marjorie Davis Park playground.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 173
B- SCORE: 81
PIONEER PARK
Location: S Mitchell Ave and Prairie Path Lane
Pa r k Ty p e : N e i g h b o r h o o d Pa r k
Size: 4.6 acres
Owned: 4.6 acres
a+53+92+0+90+0+77+88+66+5+0+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Pioneer Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 53
50 Basketball Courts 1
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 92
Multi-Use Fields 1
Drinking Fountains 1 80
Site Description
Natural Areas 1 90
Named after the Pioneer, the first steam locomotive to operate
in Elmhurst, the four acres of land were purchased in April 1974 Community Garden
for $270,000. A naming contest was held and a student at Bryan Parking Lots 1 77
Junior High chose the name for two different reasons, including
Passive Greenspaces 4 80
the upcoming bicentennial by celebrating early settlers in
Elmhurst, and its proximity to a former railroad recognizing the Paths and Sidewalks 2 88
Pioneer. In 1986, the Holloway sisters donated an additional .37
Playgrounds 1 71
acres of family land to the Park, and in 2006, a plot of land at 519
Mitchell was purchased as well. Pioneer Park includes amenities Restrooms n/a n/a
like a basketball court and soccer field. Seating Areas n/a n/a
AFT
the low amenity and park feature scores.
DR
174 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Surface issues at Pioneer Park parking lot. Sand surface transferring across Pioneer Park playground
boundaries resulting in low sand levels.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 175
C- SCORE: 72
PLUNKETT PARK
L o c a t i o n : S . We s t A v e n u e a n d W. U t l e y R o a d
Pa r k Ty p e : Co m m u n i t y Pa r k
Size: 16 acres
Owned: 16 acres
a+68+82+63+89+74+83+73+55+83+56+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Plunkett Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 68
50 Basketball Courts 1
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 82
Drinking Fountains 1 63
Site Description
Natural Areas 1 89
Plunkett Park is home to Courts Plus, where the Elmhurst
community comes to stay fit and be active. The park offers a Community Garden
playground, three baseball diamonds, basketball court, batting Parking Lots 2 74
cages, concession stand and picnic area.
Passive Greenspaces 3 83
Plunkett Park scored a low C- (72). The playground and Paths and Sidewalks 3 73
seating areas received failing marks due to deterioration and
Playgrounds 1 55
infrastructure management. This includes broken bench panels,
chipped paint and rust. The athletic field score (82), and the Restrooms 1 83
athletic courts score (68) could improve with painted field Seating Areas 2 56
markings and designated signage.
Special Amenities: Storage
AFT
DR
176 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Plunkett Park Batting Cages. Lack of field markings at Plunkett Park soccer field.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 177
C
SCORE: 75
a+0+78+0+0+53+82+75+76+0+74+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Salt Creek Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Horseshoe Courts 2
Athletic Fields 78
Multi-Use Fields 2
Drinking Fountains 1 72
Site Description
Natural Areas n/a n/a
Salt Creek Park is the second oldest park in Elmhurst. The original
9.5 acres were purchased in 1927 for $20,000 and dedicated Community Garden
September 22, 1928. An additional parcel was acquired in 1967. Parking Lots 2 53
In early years, the park was very popular, allowing access to Salt
Passive Greenspaces 3 82
Creek for fishing. It also had a swimming hole and ice rink with
a warming house and picnic shelter. The expansion of Route 83 Paths and Sidewalks 3 75
eventually reduced the size, but in 1991, the Elmhurst Chicago
Playgrounds 1 76
Stone Company donated 21,780 sq.ft. making the park 10 acres.
A master plan was developed in 1999 when Elmhurst College Restrooms 1 77
approached the District to enter into an agreement to construct Seating Areas 4 74
a NCAA womens softball field and complex. In 2005, the Board
Special Amenities: Storage, Picnic Shelter/Pavilion
approved the agreement. Construction was completed in 2006.
Along with the diamonds, Salt Creek Park offers horseshoe pits.
Salt Creek Park scored a fair (75) overall. The parking lots suffered
from surfacing issues, including cracks and gaps over 18 inches Date Surveyed: October 18, 2016
AFT
wide. Additionally, the seating areas scored low due to rusted and
DR
corroded picnic grills.
Baseball diamond and seating areas at Salt Creek Park. Salt Creek Park seating area equipped with benches and
damaged grills.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 179
D
SCORE: 65
a+0+0+0+0+0+71+62+0+0+0+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Sleepy Hollow Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
AFT
DR
180 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Walking path at Sleepy Hollow Park. Passive Greenspace at Sleepy Hollow Park.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 181
C+ SCORE: 79
a+0+52+53+0+0+59+93+0+0+73+
Leased: 2.7 acres
100 Van Voorst Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 65
Multi-Use Fields 2
Drinking Fountains 1 65
Site Description
Natural Areas n/a n/a
Adjacent to Jefferson School, Jefferson Park was renamed May 19,
1979 for the former elementary principal and long-time resident Community Garden
Jack VanVoorst. With a baseball diamond, soccer field, and traffic Parking Lots n/a n/a
from Jefferson School, Van Voorst sees a lot of use.
Passive Greenspaces 1 72
Van Voorst Park scored a fair (79) overall. The drinking fountain Paths and Sidewalks 2 94
received poor grades for leakage and rust. Additionally, the
Playgrounds n/a n/a
athletic fields scored low due to surface issues, including
landscaping and field markings. Restrooms n/a n/a
Seating Areas 1 74
AFT
DR
182 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Passive Greenspace at Van Voorst Park. Soccer field at Van Voorst Park.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 183
B- SCORE: 82
WASHINGTON PARK
Location: S Poplar Ave and E May Street
Pa r k Ty p e : N e i g h b o r h o o d Pa r k
Size: 3.3 acres
Owned: 3.3 acres
a+79+72+91+0+83+83+78+91+0+80+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Washington Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 79
50 Basketball Courts 1
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 72
Multi-Use Fields 1
Drinking Fountains 1 91
Site Description
Natural Areas n/a n/a
Washington School and the surrounding land were purchased from
Elmhurst School District 205 in 1979 for $410,000. The school Community Garden
was removed, and the land turned into a park in 1980. Washington Parking Lots 1 83
Park amenities include a ball diamond, basketball court, and
Passive Greenspaces 2 83
playground.
Paths and Sidewalks 1 78
Washington Park scored a low B- (82). While this is considered a
Playgrounds 1 91
good score, the multi-use fields and baseball diamonds scored
only fair. The multi-use fields received low scores for faded field Restrooms n/a n/a
markings and landscaping issues such as worn or bare spots. The Seating Areas 2 80
baseball diamonds received fair scores for fencing issues such as
Special Amenities: Temporary/Portable Restroom
rust and paint. Washington Park playground and drinking fountain
scored well.
AFT
DR
184 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 185
D
SCORE: 64
a+0+0+0+67+0+62+64+0+0+0+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Wild Meadows Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Passive Greenspaces 3 62
Wild Meadows Park scored poorly (64) overall. Its greenspaces,
paths, and sidewalks all scored low due to migrating materials, Paths and Sidewalks 2 64
path and natural obstructions (such as a downed tree), and path
Playgrounds n/a n/a
markings.
Restrooms n/a n/a
AFT
DR
186 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Paved path at Wild Meadows Park. Fallen tree at Wild Meadows Park.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 187
B- SCORE: 80
a+0+0+71+96+0+81+79+9+0+83+
Leased: 32 acres
100 Wild Meadows Trace Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Drinking Fountains 2 71
Site Description
Natural Areas 1 96
Named after the park it is adjacent to, Wild Meadows Trace was
added as a right-of-way along the old Great Western Railroad. Community Garden
The land was acquired in 1971. Wild Meadows Trace was planned Parking Lots n/a n/a
using shrubs, flowering bushes, wildflowers, and trees in their
Passive Greenspaces 6 81
natural condition. Open grassy areas were left between the
clusters of native growth. Considered a special use area, the park Paths and Sidewalks 10 81
does contain development for active recreation. It was dedicated,
Playgrounds 1 65
along with the restored Great Western Railroad Depot, on July 4,
1976. Safety Town was then created to teach children bicycle and Restrooms n/a n/a
pedestrian safety. Some amenities included at Wild Meadows Trace Seating Areas 6 83
include a 9/11 memorial, bicentennial fountain, The Depot, and the
Special Amenities: n/a
Illinois Prairie Path.
Wild Meadows Trace scored 80, a low B. Its natural area received
excellent scores. Drinking fountains and seating areas could be
improved. Seating areas were negatively impacted by maintenance Date Surveyed: October 25, 2016
AFT
issues such as overflowing trash cans. Its poor playground score
DR
reflects missing playground equipment and overall quality.
Walking path at Wild Meadows Trace. Trash overflow at Wild Meadows Trace.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 189
B+ SCORE: 89
WILDER PARK
Location: 175 S Prospec t Avenue
Pa r k Ty p e : Co m m u n i t y Pa r k
Size: 17.3 acres
Owned: 17.3 acres
a+89+0+96+0+82+87+85+98+0+87+
Leased: 0 acres
100 Wilder Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
Athletic Courts 89
50 Basketball Courts n/a
Tennis Courts 4
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Drinking Fountains 2 96
Site Description
Natural Areas n/a n/a
Voted by Chicago Magazine as the #1 Suburban Park in 1997,
Wilder Park was the first park acquired by the District in 1921. Community Garden
This cultural hub sits in the center of town and hosts large-scale Parking Lots 3 82
annual community events, concerts and movies. Children enjoy the
Passive Greenspaces 13 87
playground, families walk and bike the pathways and groups of all
ages gather on the greenspace for sports, activities and picnics. Paths and Sidewalks 9 85
The Wilder Park Conservatory, is open to the public year-round
Playgrounds 1 98
and hosts stunning floral displays and offers youth education
programs. Greenhouses provide a temperate growing space for Restrooms 1 87
plants that are utilized throughout the community and the Formal Seating Areas 6 87
Gardens offer a beautiful setting for a quiet stroll or wedding. The
centerpiece of the park, Wilder Mansion, hosts hundreds of events Special Amenities: Memorial
each year. Wilder Park is also home to the Elmhurst Public Library,
Lizzadro Museum of Lapidary Art and Elmhurst Art Museum.
Wilder Park scored very good, with an overall park score of 89. Its Date Surveyed: October 22, 2016
AFT
landscaping and features are well-maintained. The parking lots
DR
suffered from faded markings and large surface cracks.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 191
C+ SCORE: 77
YORK COMMONS
L o c a t i o n : 6 6 5 S Yo r k S t r e e t
Pa r k Ty p e : Co m m u n i t y Pa r k
Size: 11.6 acres
Owned: 11.6 acres
a+0+68+0+0+64+73+76+84+0+78+
Leased: 0 acres
100 York Commons Park Features and Amenities
Quantity Score
AT H L E T I C F I E L D S
D R I N K I N G F O U N TA I N S
N AT U R A L A R E A S
PA R K I N G L O T S
PA S S I V E G R E E N S PA C E S
P AT H S A N D S I D E W A L K S
P L AY G R O U N D S
RESTROOMS
S E AT I N G A R E A S
Athletic Fields 68
Multi-Use Fields 1
Playgrounds 1 84
York Commons Park received a fair score of 77. The athletic fields
and playground suffered from weeds and maintenance issues. Restrooms 1 79
Additionally, seating at the park features were deteriorating and in Seating Areas 1 78
need of replacement or maintenance.
Special Amenities: Skate Park, Swimming Pool
AFT
DR
192 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 193
AFT
DR
194 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
FACILITY
SCORECARDS
FACILITY CONDITIONS FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
The grades for each category were Of the eleven facilities included in the The four park recreation buildings
determined during each facility visit. The assessment, only Courts Plus scored a are significantly under-utilized and
eight facility considerations are equally B grade, while eight facilities (73%) although convenient for users,
weighted and included the following: received a C grade. Two facilities are not the most cost effective
scored D grades, highlighting way to offer the Sunbeams &
their immediate need and attention Rainbows Preschool program. A
Interior / Furniture / Finishes for improvement. These included building expansion at the Wagner
the Sugar Creek Golf Maintenance Community Center may be a better
HVAC (heating/ventilation/air-
Building and the Wilder Park Former long-term solution to provide space
conditioning)
Administration Building (225 Prospect). for these programs while increasing
Plumbing / Fire Protection The maintenance facility requires the space utilization.
Electrical replacement and the second, a historic
structure, requires a facility assessment
Roof and reuse study to determine the
Building Exterior / Windows / Doors related costs and best uses.
Security (cameras, lights, alarms)
ADA Compliance (Americans with
Disability Act) One facility receiving a C grade was
the DuPage Medical Building that will
be acquired on May 31, 2017. A facility
assessment and further study will be
required to assist the Park District in
NOTES / OBSERVATIONS determining the best use.
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 195
B
COURTS PLUS
L o c a t i o n : 1 8 6 S . We s t Av e n u e
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 9 0 , 0 0 0 s f
B u i l t : 1 9 7 2 I n d o o r Te n n i s C o u r t s
Ad d i t i o n s : 1989 + 2001
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
196 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 197
C-
DUPAGE MEDICAL BUILDING
L o c a t i o n : 135 S. Rober t Palmer Drive
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 1 3 , 3 9 6 s f o n 0 . 8 6 2 a c r e l o t
Bu i l t : 1961
A d d i t i o n s : n /a , P a r k D i s t r i c t w i l l t a k e o w n e r s h i p o n M a y 3 1 , 2 0 1 7
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
198 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Entrance canopy
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 199
BUTTERFIELD PARK
RECREATIONAL BUILDING
C
L o c a t i o n : 3 8 5 E . Va n B u r e n S t r e e t
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 1 , 9 4 7 s f
Built: 1960
Additions: NA
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
200 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Indoor space
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 201
CRESTVIEW PARK
RECREATIONAL BUILDING
C+
L o c a t i o n : 24 5 E . C r e s t v i e w Av e n u e
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 2 , 7 0 0 s f
B u i l t : 1 970
Additions: NA
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
202 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 203
ELDRIDGE PARK
RECREATIONAL BUILDING
C
Lo c a t i o n : 363 Commonwealth Lane
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 2 , 6 0 0 s f
Built: 1965
Additions: NA
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
204 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 205
SMALLEY BATH HOUSE
C
L o c a t i o n : 6 6 5 S o u t h Yo r k S t r e e t
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 3 , 5 0 0 s f
Built: 1968
Additions: NA
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
206 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Concessions
Main entrance
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 207
THE ABBEY
C+
L o c a t i o n : 4 0 7 W. S t . C h a r l e s R o a d
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 5 , 0 0 0 s f
Bu i l t : 1953 as youth center
Additions: 1964
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
208 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 209
JOANNE B. WAGNER
COMMUNITY CENTER
C
L o c a t i o n : 6 1 5 N . We s t Av e n u e
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 3 2 , 0 0 0 s f
B u i l t : 1950s - Lewis J.Cornille Grade School
A c q u i r e d /A d d i t i o n s : 2 0 0 3 / 2 0 0 4 G y m n a s t i c s C e n t e r
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Plumbing / Fire Protection X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
210 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
Gymnastics Classroom
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 211
WILDER PARK
RECREATION BUILDING
C
L o c a t i o n : 1 75 P r o s p e c t Av e n u e
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 1 , 8 0 0 s f
B u i l t : 1 972
Additions: NA
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
212 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 213
WILDER PARK FORMER
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
D+
L o c a t i o n : 2 2 5 P r o s p e c t Av e n u e
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 5 , 5 4 3 s f
Built: NA
A d d i t i o n s : 1 9 7 2 P l a n n i n g O f f i c e / 1 9 74 G a r a g e
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
214 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 215
SUGAR CREEK GOLF
MAINTENANCE BUILDING
D
L o c a t i o n : 5 0 0 E . Va n B u r e n
To t a l S q u a r e Fo o t a g e : 2 , 0 2 5 s f
Built: NA
Additions: NA
Facility Conditions
A = Excellent B = Above Average C = Average D = Below Average F = Poor
Considerations A B C D F
HVAC X
Electrical X
Roof X
Security X
FT
ADA Compliance X
A
DR
216 | VISION 2020: FOCUS ON THE FUTURE APPENDIX C
DR
AF
T
PARK AND FACILITY SCORECARDS ELMHURST PARK DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 217