Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • Is-1893-Part 1 To 4-Latest Version

    Hochgeladen von

    Manvendra Nigam
    4K Ansichten134 Seiten
    is 1893 2016 updated

    Originaltitel

    Is-1893-Part 1 to 4-Latest Version (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    is 1893 2016 updated

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    4K Ansichten134 Seiten

    Is-1893-Part 1 To 4-Latest Version

    Hochgeladen von

    Manvendra Nigam
    is 1893 2016 updated

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 134
    ( andber water 1S 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 Indian Standard Zag aS ssn ee te, (Go-nom priny)* Pr ann APT 1 BATT STE Sie aT (Bar FRET) Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings ( Sixth Revision } Ics91.120.25 © Bis 2016 sila are =) BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS Tne TH, 9 aegeME oEt anf, ag fereit-110002 MANAK BHAVAN, @ BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHEt 10002 . ‘wn slandardsbis December 2016 Price Group 13, Earthquake Engineering Scetional Committee, CED 39 FOREWORD ‘This Indian Stomdard (Part 1) (Sixth Revision) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the drat finalized by the Earthquake Enginccting Sectional Committe bad been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council. India is prone to strong earthquake shaking, and hence earthquake resistant design is essential. The Committee hhas considered an earthquake zoning map based on the maximum intensities at each location as recorded from damage surveys after past earthquakes, taking into account, 2) known magnitudes and the known epicentres (see Annex A) assuming all other conditions as being average; and bb) tectonics (ree Annex B) and lithology (see Annex C) of exc region. ‘he Seismic Zone Map (sce Fig. 1)is broadly associated with 1964 MSK Intensity Seale (see Annex D) corresponding (0 VI(orless), Vil, VI and IX (and above) for Seismic Zones Il, HI, TV and V, respectively. Seismic Zone Factoss for some important towns are given in Annex E, Structures designed as per this standard are expected to sustain damage during strong earthquake ground shaking. ‘The provisions of this standard are intended for earthquake resistant design of only normal structures (without cncrgy dissipation devices or systems in-built). This standard provides the minimum design force for earthquake resistant design of special structures (such as large and tall buildings, lage and high dans, long-span bridges and major industrial projects), Such projects require rigorous, site-specific investigation to arrive at more accurate earthquake hazard assessment. ‘To control Joss of life and propeity, base isolation or other advanced techniques may be adopted. Currently, the Indien Standard is under formulation for design of such buildings; until the standard becomes available, specialist literature should be consulted for design, detail, installation and maintenance of such buildings. 1S 1893 : 1962 ‘Recommendations for earthquake resistant design of structures’ was frst published in 1962, and revised in 1966, 1970, 1975 and 1984, Further, in 2002, the Committe decided to present the provisions for different types of siractres in separate pars, to keep abreast with rapid developments and extensive research cartied out in earthquake-resistant design of various structures, Thus, 1S 1893 was split into five parts. The other parts inthe series are: Part 1 General provisions and buildings Part 2 Liquid retaining tanks — Elevated and ground supported Part 3 Bridges and retaining walls Part 4 Industeal structures, including stack-like structures Part 5 Dams and embankments (to be formulated) This standard (Part L) contains general provisions on carthquake hazard assessment applicable (o all buildings nd structures covered in Parts 2 to S, Also, Part I contains provisions specific to eatthquake-resistant design of buildings. Unless stated otherwise, the provisions in Parts 2 to 5 are to be read necessarily in conjunction with the general provisions as laid down in Patt I 4 In this revision, the following changes have been included: a) Design spectra are defined for natural period up to 6 s; 'b) Same design response spectra are specified forall buildings, irespective of the material of construction; Indian Standard CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BUILDINGS (Sixth Revision ) LSCOPE, 1.1 This standard (Part 1) primarily deals with earthquake hazard assessment for earthquake-resistant design of (1) buildings, 2) liquid retaining steuctures, G3) bridges, (4) embankments and retaining walls, (6) industrial and stack-like strvctures, and (6) concrete, masonry and earth dams. Also, this standard (Part 1) deals with earthquake-resistant design of buildings; earthquake-resistant design of the other structures is dealt within Parts 2 (0 5. 1.2 All structures, like parking stractures, security ‘cabins and ancillary structures need to be designed for appropriate earthquake effects as per this standard. 13 Temporary cloments, such. seafoldingand temporary ‘excavations, need to be desigued as per this standard. 1.4 This standard does not deal with construction Features relating to earthquake-resistant buildings and other structures. For guidance on earthguake-resistant construction of buildings, reference may be made to the latest revisions of the following Indian Standards: 1S 4326, 1S 13827, 18 13828, IS 13920, IS 13935 and 1S 15988. 15 The provisions of this standard are applicable even to critical and special structures, like nuclear power plants, petroleum refinery plants and large dams. For such structures, additional requirements may be imposed based on special stidies, such as site-specific hazard assessment. In such eases, the earthquake effects specified by this standard shail be taken as at Teast the minimum, ‘2 REFERENCES ‘The standards listed below contain provisions, which, through reference in this text, constimte provisions of this standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid, All standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on this standard are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the standards indicated below: ISNo. Tile 4562000 Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete (fourth revision) ISNo. 800: 2007 815 (Part 1: 1987) (Past 2: 1987) (Part3 :2015) 1343:2012 1498: 1970 1888: 1982 1893 (Part2):2014 (a3) :2014 (arta): 2015, 1905: 1987 2431: 1981 2809 1972 2810: 1979 oma (Part): 1982 (Part): 1980 art 3):1992 (Part 4): 1979 1S 1893 Part 1) : 2016 Tile Code of practice for general ‘construction in teal (second revision) Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures: Dead loads — Unit weights of building ‘material and stored materials (second revision) Imposed loads (second revision) ‘Wind loads (hint revision) Snow loads (second revision) Special loads and load combinations (second revision) Code of practice for prestressed conctete (second revision) Classification and identification of soils for general engineering ‘purposes (first revision) Method of load test on soils (second revision) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures Liquid retaining tanks Bridges and retaining walls Industrial structres including stack- Tike structures (first revision) Code of practice for siructaral use of “unreinforced masonry (thr revision) Method of standard penetration test for soils (first revision) Glossary of ttm and syinbols relating, to soil engineering (first revision) _ Glossary of terms relating to soil dynamics (first revision) Code of practice for design and cons- truction of machine foundations: Foundation for reciprocating type machines Foundations for impact type ‘machines (Hammer foundations) Foundations forrotary type machines (Medium and high frequency) Foundations for rotary type ‘machines of low frequency 1S 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ISNo. Title (Part5): 1987 Foundations for impact machines other than hammer (Forging, and stamping press, pig breaker, drop cmsher and jolter) Barthquake resistant design and construction of buildlings—Code of Practice (third revision) Code of practice for determination of beating capacity of shallow foundations (frst revision) Improving earthquake resistance of ceatthen buildings — Guidelinos Improving earthquake resistance of low strength masonry buildings — Guidelines Ductile design and detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces — Code of practice first revision) Repair end seismic strengthening of buildings — Guidelines Seisinic evaluation and sirengthening of existing reinforced concrete building — Guidelines National Building Code of fia: Part 6 Structural Design, Section 4 Masoary 4326:2013, 6403: 1981 13827: 1993) 13828: 1993 13920:2016 13935 1993 15988:2013 SP7:2016 (art 6800 4) 3 TERMINOLOGY For the purpose of this standard, definitions given below shall apply to ali structures, in general, For definition of terms pertaining to soil mechanics and soil dynamics, reference may be made to IS 2809 and 182810, and for definition of terms pertaining to ‘loads’, reference may be made to IS 875 (Parts 1 to 5). 3.1 Closely-Spaced Modes — Closely-spaced modes of a structure are those of the natural modes of ‘oscillation of a structure, whose natural frequencies Dimension of a building in a considered direction Modal mass of mode k Number of storeys or floors ‘Corrected SPT value for soil Number of modes to be considered as per 778.2 Mode participation factor of mode & Lateral force a floor Desig atoral force ot floor i in mode k Response reduction factor Design / Response acceleration coefficient for rock or soil sites as given by Fig. 2 ‘and 64.2 based on appropriate natural period Lateral shear strength of storey 7 Undamped natural period of oscillation of the structure (in second) Approximate fundamental period (i second) ‘Undamped natural period of mode k of oscillation (in second) Fundamental natural period of oscillation (in second) Design seismic base shear Design bese shear calculated using the approximate fundamental period 7, Peak storey shear force in storey / due to all ‘modes considered Shear force in storey iin mode & Peak storey shear force in the top storey due to all modes considered Seismie weight ofthe building. Seismic weight of floori Seismic zone factor Mode shape coefficient at floor i in mode k Peak response (for example, member forees, displacements, storey forces, storey shears ‘or base reactions) due to all modes considered Absolute value of maximum response in modo k Absolute value of maximum response in mode c, where mode ¢ is a elosely-spaced mode Peak response du to the elosely-spaced modes only Coefficient used in complete quadratic combination (CQC) method while combining responses of modes # andj Circular frequency (in radis) in mode J 6 GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN ‘CRITERIA 6.1 General Principles 6.1 Ground Motion ‘The characteristics (intensity, duration, frequency content, et) of seismic ground vibrations expected at ‘any site depend on magnitude of earthquake, its focal depth, epicenteal distance, characteristics of the path through which the seismic waves travel, and soil sraia on which the structure is founded. ‘The random earthquake ground motions, which cause the structure to oscillate, can bo resolved in any three mutually perpendicular directions. The predominant direction of ‘ground vibration is usually horizontal Effects of earthquake-induced vertical shaking can be significant for overall stability analysis of structures, especially in structures (a) with large spans, and (b) those in which stability is a eriterion for design, Reduction in gravity force due to vertical ground ‘motions cen be detrimental particularly in prestressed horizontal members, cantilevered members and gravity structures. Hence, special attention shall be paid to effects of vertical ground motion on prestressed or cantilevered beams, girders and slabs, 6.1.2 The response ofa structure fo ground vibrations depends on (2) typeof foundation; (b) materials, form, size and mode of construction of structures; and (© duration and characteristics of ground motion. This standard specifies design forces for structures founcled fon rocks or soils, which do not settle, liquefy o slide duc to loss of strength during earthquake ground vibrations. 6.1.3 Acteal forces that appear on structures during earthquakes are much higher than the design forces specified inthe standard. Ductltysrising from inelastic material behaviour with appropriate design and detsiling, an oversttength resulting ftom the additional reseve strength in structures over and above the design strength are relied upon for the deficit in acmal and design Intel loads. In other words, eartquake resistant design as per this standard relies on inelastic ‘behaviour structures. But, the maximum ductility that cean be realized in structures is limited. Therefare, structures shall be designed for atleast the minimum 400s 25 O 4005 25 0 4008 ») For use in response spectrum method [vee Fig.2091 L41ST T< 0.108 Forrocky|25 0.10s4.00s List P<0.10s frormed-|25 10s 4.008 Leis 7<0.108 25 0.10s) Raft foundations — Weighted average of N of soil layers from depth of founding, to dept of founding pur twice the breadth of rt ©) Pile foundation — Weighted avorage of W of soit Iayers from depth of boli tip of pile, to depth of bottom tip of pile pl twice the diameter of ple; 4) Group pile foundation — Weighted average of N of oil ayes ftom depth of bottom tp of pile group, to ‘depth of bottom tip of pile group plas tice the with ‘of ile group; and ) Wall foundation — Weighted average of N of soil layer ftom depth of bottom tp of well, to depth of bottom tp of well plus ewice the wid of well. 10 ‘Table 2 Classification of Types of Soils for Determining Percentage Inerease in Net Bearing Pressure and Skin Friction (Clause 63.5.2) Si No. Soil Type Remarks a @ eo 3) ‘Type A Wellgraded gavel (GW) orwell gnded sand Rock or (SW) both with es than $ percent passing Incd soils 75 mm sive (Fines) Well graded gravel — sand sixtures with ‘or withovt fines (GW-SW) Pootly-praded sand (SP) or Clayey sand (SC), all having N above 30 Sift to hard ely baving above 30, where ‘Nis corte standard penetration test value ii) Type B_ Poorly graded sands or poorly graded sands Media or wih gravel (SP) wit tle ono fies having Sif oils between 10 and 30 Suit to medivm stiff fine-gesined soils, Like sits of low compressibility (ML) ot lays of low compressibility (CLY having NW besween 10 and 30 ul) Type C All soft sais othr thas SP wih N10. The Seft coils vious posibie sole ae: Silts of intermediate compessbiliy (Qs Silts of high compressibility (MH); Clays of intermediate compres (C1; (Clays of high compressibility (CH), Sits and clays of intexmediate 10 high com-pressbility (MEMH or CI-CH); Sit wi lay of Iaermediste compressbity (MECH; and Silt with clay of high compressibility (MHC, iv) Type D Requires site specific study and special Unstable, eatment according to site contin (eee collapsible, 6.3.5.3) Uiguetnble ‘Table3 Seismic Zone Factor Z (Clause 6.4.2) Selamle Zone Factor MY o 2 oo © © z 010 0.16 0.24 0.36 6.4.3 bffeets of design earthquake loads applied on structures can be considered in two ways, namely: ) Equivalent static method, and b) Dynamic analysis method, In turn, dynamic analysis ean be performed ‘ways, namely: in three 1) Response spectrum method, 2) Modal time history method, and 3) Timehistory method. In this standard, Equivalent Static Method, Response Spectrum Method and Time History Method are staan 2016 eee MAP OF INDIA SHOWING ‘SEISMIC ZONES OF INDIA 18 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 20 —— Tipe! ROCK OR HARD Sm. 2s | "ye MEDIUM Om. : —— type tt SoFr son Bus 10 os ° 0 7 3 3 7 3 3 NATURAL PERIODT, 2ASPEGTRAFOR EQUNALENTSTATIC METHOO 20 = 25 —— te! ROCK OR HARD son i Type ! MEDIUM 80% ‘Type il SOFT SOIL Bis 10 os rf eee ESE eee 7 7 7 3 i 3 3 NATURAL PERIODT.« an SPEOTRAOR RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD Fo, 2Distow Acortsnaion Cote (8/8) (Conner 5 Pstcew Danna) Tabled Chassifeaton o Types ot Sols Determining the Spectrum beUsed to otimateDesinar quae ere (Clause 6.4.2.1) Bae oon cooe oe 3 ‘iy 1 2) Well goded el (GW) or welded snd (SW) bath wht than Spe pang 75 om ive ns vy Wl pode goed mite with wit ae (GW-SW) 1 Pony gel and) cr yy sad (SC, ng Wve 90 5B suttofard shy ving abe 3, wher Nie indard poeta te ae 5 Deny pe scr pty ed i ga is lt es kv Hoy 120830 3) Stato mado sl Enagined i bere a low compreiity (ML) o ay of oe Sum sells compresibiliy (CL) having W bebween 10 and 30 os All oP sails other than SP with N10, Tho various posts soils are: Sof site 4) Site of intenmedinte compcessiity (Ml); ie ity (MEN «) Claye of intennecate compeessbilty (Cs 4) Clays of high compressibility (CH) ) Sis and clays of intermediate to high compresbity (MLMI or CLCH; 2 Silt with clay of intermedite compressblty (MCD; and 2) Sit with clay of high compresiily (MECH) B 1g 1893 (Part 1) 2016 adopted. Equivalent static method may be used for analysis of regular structures with approximate natural period 7, less than 0.45. 643A. For structural analysis, the moment of inertia shall be taken as: 8) Im RC and masonry structures: 70 perceat of Tyo OF columns, and 35 percent OF lps OF beams; and b) In steel structures: J, of both beams and columns “6.4.4 Where a number ofmades are tobe considered in response spectrum method, 4, as defined in 6.4.2 for ‘each mode k shall be determined using natural period 7, of oscillation of that mode. 6.45 For underground structures and buildings whose bases located al depths of 30 m or more, A, atthe base shall be taken as half the value obtained from 6.4.2. ‘This reduced value shall be used only for estimating inertia effects due to masses atthe corresponding levels below the ground; the inertia effects for the above ‘ground portion ofthe building shall be estimated based ‘on the unreduced value of dy, For estimating inertia ‘offocts due to masses of structures and foundations placed berween the ground level and 30 in depth, the design horizontal acceleration spectrum value shatl be linearly intespolated between Ay and 0.5 4y, where Ay, is as specified in 6.4.2. 46.4.6 The design seismic seceleration spectral value Ay ‘or vertical motions shall be taken as: 22 (55) 2) setuitngs erent (feito 7 (G4) (25) Fortiquid retaining tanks RSET governed by 1S 1893 (an 2) For bridges governed DbyIS 5893 (Part 3) For industrial structures governed by IS 1893 (Pare a) ‘The value of S,/g shall be based on natural period 7 corresponding tothe first vestical mode of oseillation, using 6.4.2. 64.7 When design aoceleration spectrum is developed specific to 9 project site, the same may be used for esign of structures of the project. In such eases, cffects of the site-specific spectrum shall not be less than those arising out of the design spectrum specified in this standard, ‘7BUILDINGS ‘Tho four main desirable attributes of an earthquake resistant building ave a) Robust structural configuration, b) Atleast minimum elastic lateral stiffness, ©) Atleast a minimum lateral strength, and 4) Adequate ductility. 71.1 Regular and Irregular Configurations Buildings with simple regular geometry and uniformly

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen