February 27th 2007 A.D.

To: Carol Skelton the private woman acting as the minister of National Revenue.

C/o Box 190 Harris Saskatchewan, Prairie Pines Elk Ranch

From: Minister David _____Lachinski?

C/o #***************** Vancouver British Columbia the land mass

No code non commercial

Hello and Greetings in the name of YHWH and our savior Yehushua the anointed . My
Christian baptismal name is David_______ and I am of the Lachinski? family of the
geographical location called Edmonton Alberta Canada and have been told vebally that I
came into this land on the _____Day of ____________________ in Nineteen Hundred
and ________ A.D. In the ___________________ also being in the geographical location
of ______________.

I work as a painter-
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

I have recently been exposed to information that has caused me to strengthen my spiritual
connections in exercising my faith and beliefs. As a result of my spiritual awareness and
this knowledge I must quest after your awareness and hopefully establish an agreement
with you.
My understanding of life being brought up with a good moral structure is first to do no
harm.

I in my endeavour's in life have fallen from time to time along the road in and as such, as
the prodigal son, have reviewed my past and my awareness of God's law and decided it
was time for atonement and forgiveness.

My exercising of my faith may conflict with your monetary policies that in fact are not
law but corporate rules so by this agreement I am ensuring no false assumptions or
process may be engaged in obstructing me or intimidating me from having the ability to
practice my faith harmless from reproach.

First off I wish you to be aware this is a sincere expression of what I know and believe
and in no way is intended to be mischievous intimidating or malicious as it is a true
expression of my beliefs and faith.

I have been considering joining a relatively new and International Church that offers
redemption from a false god's system of laws. Before I do that, I wish to know if you
have any law that can induce me or intimidate me to violate my faith in practicing the
laws of the King James Bible of which such faith is founded upon?

If you do then obviously I will not be to interested in joining this Church.

So please get back to me with the information if you have it available, as if it is not
lawful for me to follow the laws of God then I need to see by whose authority that I can
be intimidated to break them.

If you have no authority to intimidate me to violate Gods first commandment then you
have no authority outside of Gods law as God's first commandment is Do not bow to
false Gods nor serve them .

Before you reply I would like you to review some of your own governments information.
This is clearly important for you to be aware of before you can grasp the significance of
what I am endeavoring to tell you.

First I would like you to know what the word De facto means so you can see the top of
the Canadian pyramid and what source it has for authority.

De Facto
De facto. [L.] actually; in fact; existing; as a king de facto, distinguished from a
king de jure, or by right.
American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. I,
page 56.

DE FACTO. Actually; in fact; in deed. A term used to denote a thing actually

done.
A government de facto signifies one completely, through only temporarily,
established in the place of the lawful government; Thomas v. Taylor, 42 Miss.
651, 2 Am. Rep. 625, Chisholm v. Coleman, 43 Ala. 204, 94 Am. Dec. 677, See
De Jure Austin, Jur. Lect. vi. p. 336.
Bouviers Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 1, page
761.

de facto (d fakt). In fact, as distinguished from de jure, by right.

Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 344.

de facto government. A government wherein all the attributes of sovereignty

have, by usurpation,(see below) been transferred from those who had been
legally invested with them to others, who, sustained by a power above the
forms of law, claim to act and do act in their stead. 30 Am Jur 181.
Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 345.
 De facto. In fact; actually; indeed; in reality. Ridout v. State, 161 Tenn. 248, 30
S.W.2d 255, 257, 71 A.L.R. 830.
Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 504.

De facto government. One that maintains itself by a display of force against

the will of the rightful legal government and is successful, at least
temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government
by setting up its own in lieu thereof. Wortham v. Walker, 133 Tex. 255, 128
S.W.2d 1138, 1145.
Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 504.

de facto (d fakt, da-, de-). [[L]] existing or being such in actual fact though not
by legal establishment, official recognitiont, etc. [de facto government]: cf. de
jure.
Websters New World Dictionary, 3rd College Ed. (1988), page 360.

Top of Form

Reference > Usage > The Columbia Guide to Standard American English

CONTENTS BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD

Bottom of Form
Kenneth G. Wilson (1923). The Columbia Guide to Standard American English. 1993.

de jure, de facto

De jure is a Latin phrase meaning by right or legally that English has taken over first
1
in legal jargon and then adopted into the general language. It usually contrasts with de
facto, which means in fact but not in law. A de jure government is one legally in
place; a de facto government is one effectively in power and operating, but without legal
authority. Spell both locutions as two words, and pronounce de either dee, dai, or di,
stressing the first syllable of the second word in each phrase, JOOR-ee (or JOOR-uh) and
FAK-to. See FOREIGN PHRASES.

Usurpation & Usurp

USURP, v. t. s. as z. [Fr. usurper ; L. usurpo.]
To seize and hold in possession by force or without right; as usurp a throne; to
usurp the prerogative of the crown; to usurp power. To usurp the right of a patron,
is to oust or dispossess him.
Vice sometimes usurps the place of virtue. Denham.
American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. II,
page 105.

USURPATION, n. [supra.]
The act of seizing or occupying and enjoying the property of another, without
right; as the usurpation of a throne; the usurpation of supreme power.
Usurpation, in a peculiar sense, denotes the absolute ouster and dispossession
of the patron of a church, by presenting a clerk to a vacant benefice, who is
thereupon admitted and instituted. Cyc.
American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. II,
page 105.

USURPER, n.
One who seizes or occupies the property of another, without right; as the
usurper of a throne; of power; or of rights of a patron. Shak. Dryden. Cyc.
American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. II,
page 105.

USURPATION. The unlawful assumption of the use of property which belongs to

another; an interruption or the disturbing a man in his right and possession. Tomi.

There are two kinds of usurpation: first, when a stranger, without right,
presents to a church and his clerk is admitted; and, second, when a subject uses
a franchise of the king without lawful authority. Co. Litt. 277 b.
In Governmental Law. The tyrannical assumption of the
government by force, contrary to and in violation of the
constitution of the country.
Bouviers Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 3, page
3380.

USURPER. One who assumes the right of government by force, contrary to and
in violation of the constitution of the country. Toul. Droit. Civ, n. 32.
One who intrudes himself into an office which is vacant, and ousts the
incumbent without any color of title whatever; his acts are void in every respect;
McCraw v. Williams, 33 Gratt. (Va.) 513; Hooper v. Goodwin, 48 Me. 80.
Bouviers Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 3, page
3380.

usurpation (-zr-pshon). The absolute ouster or dispossession of a patron by a

stranger who has no right to do so presented a clerk to a benefice who was
thereupon admitted to the living and instituted therein. See. 3 Bl. Comm. 242.
Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 1324.

usurper (-zr-pr). A person who assumes possession of an office, who

performs the duties, and who neither lawful title nor color of right. See Hamlin v.
Kassafer, 15 Ore. 456, 3 Am. St. Rep. 176, 179, 15 Pac. Rep. 778.
Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 1324.

USURPATION. The unlawful assumption of the use of property which belongs to

another; an interruption or the disturbing a man in his right and possession.
Tomlins.
The unlawful seizure or assumption of sovereign power; the assumption of
the government or supreme power by force or illegally, in derogation of the
constitution and of the rights of the lawful ruler.
Usurpation for which writ of prohibition may be granted involves attempted exercise of power
not possessed by inferior office. Ex parte Wilkinson, 220 Ala. 529, 126 So. 102, 104.
Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 1713.

USURPER. One who assumes the right of government by force, contrary to

and in violation of the constitution of the country. Toul. Droit. Civ, n. 32.
Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 1713.

usurp (y zurp, -surp) vt. [[ME usurpen < MFr usurper < L usurpare < usus, a
use + rapere, to seize: see rape]] to take or assume (power, a position, property,
rights, etc.) and hold in possession by force or without right vi. to practice or
commit usurpation (on or upon) usurper n. usurping|ly adv.
Websters New World Dictionary, 3rd College Ed. (1988) page 1470.

usurpation (y zer pshen, -ser-) n. [[ME usurpacion < L usuparetio]] the act of
usurping; esp., the unlawful or violent seizure of a throne, power, etc.
Websters New World Dictionary, 3rd College Ed. (1988) page 1470.
This a rendition form the Governor Generals web page. Note the use of the word
you have just seen the definition of. De facto

Here is the World Bank's, being Canada's creditor, definition of de facto.

Dealings with De Facto Governments

Note:This OP

7.30 replaces OP 7.30, dated November 1994. Questions may be addressed to the Chief
Counsel, Operations Policy.

1. A de facto government comes into, or remains in, power by means not

provided for in the countrys constitution, such as a coup d'etat, revolution,
usurpation, abrogation or suspension of the constitution.

Franais
Contact Us

Help

Search

Canada Site

Honours

Heraldry

Media

Visit us

Home

Print

Home : Governor General : Role and Responsibilities

Governor General Governor General
Biography
Speeches
Role and Responsibilities
Role and
A Modern Responsibilities of
Governor General
the Governor
Insignias General
Commander in Chief
The Office of the Governor
 State Visits
His Excellency General, Canada's oldest
Jean-Daniel Lafond continuing institution, is a thread
that ties Canadians together.
Former Governors General From Samuel de Champlain in
1608 to Viscount Monck in 1867
Congratulatory Messages to Vincent Massey in 1952 to
Submitting a proposal for vice-regal patronage todays Governor General, the
institution of Governor General
Rideau Hall dates back nearly 400 years.

The Office
What is the Governor
Top of Form General's position
in Government?
Quick Search:
Canada is a
parliamentary
democracy and a
Bottom of Form constitutional
monarchy. This
means Canadians
recognize The
Queen as our Head
of State. Canada's
Governor General
carries out Her
Majesty's duties in
Canada on a daily
basis and is
Canada's de facto
Head of State.
Like many other democracies,
Canada has clearly defined the
difference between the Head of
State and Head of Government.

The Governor General

represents The Queen

who is the Head of
State
is appointed by The
Queen on the advice of
Canadas Prime
Minister

The Prime Minister

 is the Head of
Government
is the leader of the
party with the most
support in Parliament

What does the Governor

General do?

The Governor General's role is

built on four major themes:

Representing the
Crown in Canada
Representing
Canadians and
Promoting our
Sovereignty
Celebrating Excellence

Bringing Canadians
together

Created: 2005-09-27
Updated: 2005-12-06

Important Notices

top of page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defacto is also an excellent source of a definition for the

word defacto.

The definition of that one word is a complete demonstration of how a government can act
as a false God.
I will also refer you to the repealed section 2 of the British North American Act.

It says there that the Queens heirs will be bound by and inherit the Act as under
their authority.

Footnotes to the Constitution Act, 1867

These footnotes are taken from the April 1, 1996 Consolidation of The Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982

(1) The Enacting clause was repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-
57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.). It read as follows:

Be it therefore enacted and declared by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with
the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this
present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, as follows:

(2) As enacted by the Constitution Act, 1982, which came into force on April 17,
1982. The section, as originally enacted, read as follows:

1. This Act may be cited as The British North America Act, 1867.

(3) Section 2, repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c.
14 (U.K.), read as follows:

2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the
Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Ireland.

(4) The first day of July, 1867, was fixed by proclamation dated May 22,
1867.

(5) Partially repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c.
14 (U.K.). As originally enacted the section read as follows:

4. The subsequent Provisions of this Act, shall, unless it is otherwise expressed or

implied, commence and have effect on and after the Union, that is to say, on and after the
Day appointed for the Union taking effect in the Queen's Proclamation; and in the same
Provisions, unless it is otherwise expressed or implied, the Name Canada shall be taken
to mean Canada as constituted under this Act.
(6) Canada now consists of ten provinces (Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New
Brunswick, Manitoba, British Columbia Prince Edward Island, Alberta Saskatchewan and
Newfoundland) and three territories (the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and
Nunavut).

Statute Law Revision Act, 1893

56-57 Victoria, c. 14 (U.K.)
[Note: Only parts affecting the Constitution Acts are reproduced here.]

An Act for further promoting the Revision of the Statute Law by repealing
Enactments which have ceased to be in force or have become unnecessary

[19th June 1893]

Whereas it is expedient that certain enactments, which may be regarded as

spent, or have ceased to be in force otherwise than by express specific repeal by
Parliament, or have, by lapse of time or otherwise become unnecessary, should
be expressly and specifically repealed:

Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the
advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this
present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

1. The enactments described in the schedule to this Act are hereby repealed,
subject to the provisions of this Act and subject to the exceptions and
qualifications in the schedule mentioned; and every part of a title, preamble, or
recital specified after the words "in part, namely," in connexion with an Act
mentioned in the said schedule may be omitted from any revised edition of the
statutes published by authority after the passing of this Act, and there may be
added in the said edition such brief statement of the Acts, officers, persons, and
things mentioned in the title, preamble, or recital, as may in consequence of such
omission appear necessary:

..........

4. This Act may be cited as the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893.

SCHEDULE
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------

Reign and | Title

Chapter |

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------

......................................

Constitution Act, 1867.

30 & 31 Victoria In part; namely,

c. 3 From "Be it therefore" to "same as follows."

Section two.

Section four to "provisions" where it last occurs .

Section twenty-five.

Sections forty-two and forty-three.

Section fifty-one. from "of the census" to "seventy-one and" and the
word 'subsequent ."

Section eighty-one.

Section eighty-eight, from "and the House" to the end of the section.

Sections eighty-nine and one hundred and twenty-seven.

Section one hundred and forty-five.

Repealed as to all Her Majesty's Dominions.

I will also offer you who the Supreme law of the Canadian corporation
applies to as per Heritage Canada liberal interpretation.
 Minister's page | Minister of State (Sport) | Minister of State (Multiculturalism)

Location: Home - Human Rights Program 2005/03/12

GUIDE TO THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND

FREEDOMS
Part II : The Contents of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Section 32

Application of Charter

This Charter applies

o to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all
matter within the authority of Parliament including all matters
relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
o to the legislature and government of each province in respect of
all matters within the authority of the legislature of each
province.

Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until

three years after this section comes into force.

The purpose of this section is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to
governments, and not to private individuals, businesses or other organizations.

If the Supreme law of the Canadian debtor corporation is over all the subordinate laws
and only applies to the government can you tell me how the subordinate laws apply to me
when I am not government nor partners with government?
I offer my apologies that the writers of this law make it so hard to
read but I am not the author of that confusion only my own God given
freedoms to not bow to a false god.

You with a competent eye can see readily that the government of Canada
was usurped and taken over by wealthy international bankers when in
January 22nd 1901 at Osborne house on the isle of wight Queen Victoria
died. This effectively brought the British North American Act to a
Sudden death as of the repeal of Section two that took place in 1893.
You have seen above that section 2 that was originally intended to bind
her heirs to the enforcement of that enactment. The repeal, as you have
read in the Statute law revision act of 1893, was of the consideration
of the drafters of that enactment that they no longer needed the Queen
or her heirs to continue their plunder and as such you have a de facto
unlawful government acting as if they were lawfully in a dejure position
of law. This is known as fraud.

Blessings upon your expeditious reply if you have any law regulation
court case or other authority that says you can tell me how to practice
my faith or obstruct me form the official performance of the functions
of my calling.

So in closing I await any proof you have than anything I

have said is untrue or false and the authority you may have
to intimidate me to violate my faith as if you do not I will
be joining the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption
International as one of and international group of ministers
promoting faith in God's law and not bowing to false gods.

I will return this letter to you as confirmation that we

have an agreement you have no authority to intimidate me in
the exercising of my faith. This returned letter will be
witnessed by three fellow ministers and will be testimonial
as to our good faith agreement.

In three days time from your receipt of that testimonial we

will in good faith to conclude our agreement , be posting
that confirmation of our covenant in as many local papers
and media as possible to ensure diligence is observed for
the benefit of all concerned men and women and in sealing
our agreement historically.

Blessings from:

Minister Don-Louis: Purcell