Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
United Kingdom
Bernard G. N. Smith, BDS, PhD, MS, MRD, a David W. Bartlett, BDS, PhD,
MRD, ~ and Nigel D. Robb, BDS, PhD c
UMDS, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Statement o f p r o b l e m . Recent epidemiologic evidence suggests that tooth wear is now a significant
problem in both children and adults. There is growing evidence that a major cause of the severe wear in
patients is regurgitation erosion due to a variety of factors including gastroesophageal reflux disease.
P u r p o s e . The purpose of this article is to discuss the prevalence of tooth wear in the United Kingdom.
Emphasis in management should be on accurate diagnosis, and in some patients, long-term monitoring
before embarking on any irreversible, intervenfive treatment. Even when treatment is necessary, a period of
monitoring is helpful to assess the rate of progress of the wear, the effectiveness of preventive measures,
and therefore the extent of the treatment necessary.(J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:367-72.)
I t is not always possible to differentiate between ditions. When there is inadequate evidence or when a
erosion, attrition, and abrasion, as these conditions fre- combination o f causes is present, then the term tooth
quently occur in combination. It is therefore necessary wear is preferred. Erosion is the result o f chemical dam-
to have a term for the condition in which teeth become age (acids) excluding chemicals produced by bacteria.
worn and tooth wear is a convenient, simple term readily Attrition is defined as the physical wear o f one tooth
understood by patients. This is important because the against another, which means that only tooth surfaces
management o f tooth wear relies on the patient under- that make contact with each other can be described as
standing the nature o f the condition, so that the patient having attrition. Abrasion is the physical wear o f the tooth
can provide sufficient information (sometimes sensitive surface by something other than another tooth.
or embarrassing) to the clinician to allow for a differen-
PREVALENCE OF TOOTH WEAR IN THE
tial diagnosis and to prevent further progression.
An alternative term, tooth surface loss (TSL), has been UNITED KINGDOM
proposed. 1 However, this term has two significant dis- There have been two major surveys in recent years,
advantages. First, it understates the severity o f the con- one o f adult patients in the South East o f England 2 and
dition by implying that only the surface o f the tooth is the other a national survey o f children conducted by a
lost, whereas in some situations, the wear can be very government agency. 3 The adult survey used the T o o t h
extensive. The second disadvantage o f the term is its Wear Index (TWI). 4 This index was designed to record
subtlety that escapes most patients and some dentists. levels o f tooth wear regardless o f the cause. It has been
The term was originally proposed to differentiate tooth used in a number o f studies, 5-7 the largest being 1007
surface loss from tooth subsurface loss, the latter being patients in the South East o f England. 2 Briefly, each vis-
a way o f describing early enamel caries. This distinction ible tooth surface (facial, lingual, and occlusal/incisal)
is i m p o r t a n t because early e n a m e l caries can be is recorded together with a separate score for the facial
remineralized, whereas once the surface o f the enamel cervical region, which sometimes suffers a different pat-
is lost, there is no matrix in which remineralization can tern o f wear. Scores from 0 to 4 are given, according to
take place. This distinction is important to scientists and the severity o f wear (TWI manual2.~). A problem in re-
clinicians but is less useful in communicating with pa- cording tooth wear is some wear is natural and progresses
tients. throughout life in contrast to caries and periodontal dis-
DEFINITION OF TERMS ease, which should not occur at all. The TWI therefore
incorporates threshold values for each tooth surface for
The terms erosion, attrition, and abrasion should only each decade o f age, and a computer program calculates
be applied clinically when there is strong evidence that unacceptable levels o f wear (above these thresholds). For
the differential diagnosis is clearly one o f the three con- example, Figure 1, A shows a mandibular molar with
cupped out wear defects through to dentin in a 17-year-
Presented at the Academy of Prosthodontics, Newport Beach, Calif., old patient. This amount o f wear is unacceptable or
May 1996.
pathologic for this age. Figure l , B shows a much more
~Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry.
bLecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry. extensive pattern o f wear, with dentin exposed across
CLecturer, Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Dental School, most o f the molar occlusal surface in a 75-year-old pa-
Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K. tient. Assuming that this wear had been progressive
0 5 10 15 20
M e a n T o o t h W e a r Score
jJ
30
influenced the maxillary incisal edges in at least some of
the patients. This evidence, although by no means con- o
clusive, suggests that posterior tooth loss does not sig- 15
nificantly affect anterior tooth wear.
PREVALENCE OF DENTAL EROSION IN J
CHILDREN
7 8 9 10
A national survey of over 2,000 children conducted in
the United Kingdom in 1993 examined all aspects of oral
health, s One measurement was dental erosion of the max-
illary anterior teeth. The results for permanent incisor teeth Fig. 4. The proportion of children with erosion affecting the
in children betwecn 7 and 15 years of age are illustrated permanent incisor teeth.
in Figure 4 and are distressingly high. Some evidence of
palatal enamel erosion was seen in more than a quarter of The Following dietary items, taken to excess, are
the subjects over 11 years of age and was sufficiently se- thought to produce dental erosion: Fruit juice and car-
vere in 13- to 15-year-old subjects to have penetrated to bonated drinks, citrus Fruit, picldes, spicy Food, and vin-
dentin in between 2% and 3% ofthc subjects. The Survey egar. Some industrial processes producing acid fumes
Report s suggests that this may be due to an increase in and droplets cause dental erosion, although this is now
the consumption of soft drinks, which contain acid, but less common with improved industrial practices. Also,
offers no evidence to support this assumption. some medications are acid. A common example is chew-
able vitamin C tablets that have a p H of about 2.
ETIOLOGY OF EROSION
The coFactors that affect the extent of erosion include
In addition to this survey of children, there is grow- the flow rate and buffering capacity of saliva and the
ing evidence that erosion rather than attrition or abra- effect on saliva of some common drugs such as the di-
sion is the major cause of tooth wear. ~6-19Certainly, the uretics and many of the antidepressants. The e n a m e l /
extent of the wear, particularly in young age groups, is dentin susceptibility to erosion may be influenced by
much greater when the causc is erosion compared with the fluoride content.
other causes. Recent studies 212s have shown that regurgitation ero-
Dental erosion is now recognized as being caused by sion in patients with GERD is closely related to dental
one or more of the following factors, and perhaps some erosion, particularly palatal erosion of the maxillary inci-
other factors as yet unknown: regurgitation occurring sor teeth. By using the standard internationally accepted
in the eating disorders, gastroesophageal reflux disease tests for GERD, including 24-hour monitoring of esoph-
(GERD), morning sickness, chronic alcoholism, hiatus ageal pH together with oral pH, this study related these
hernia, and voluntary rumination. 2 measurements to dental erosion. Figure 5 illustrates the
GERD +
Symptoms +
GERD +
Symptoms-
GERD-
Symptoms + ~ 6
Fig. 5. Number of patients with and without gastroesophageal toration difficult if allowed to continue. Currently, it is
reflux disease and with and without symptoms. All 40 patients
believed that active treatment is provided too early in
had well-established palatal erosion exposing large areas of
many patients. 26
dentin.
PREVENTION
number o f patients with and without GERD and with It is not possible to describe herein the details o f the
and without symptoms in 40 patients with well-estab- methods o f prevention of the eating disorders, chronic
lished palatal erosion, exposing large areas o f dentin in all alcoholism, or GERD that are mainly medical in nature
patients. The relationship between symptoms and GERD but to which the dentist can make a significant contri-
in 16 of the patients is to be expected, but the finding bution. Ira dietary cause is clearly identified, the dentist
that 9 of this sample of 40 patients (36%) had no symp- has a major role in preventing erosion.
toms and yet were diagnosed as having GERD is surpris- Preventing attrition caused by nocturnal bruxism is
ing. These are patients lmown by gastroenterologists as difficult, but hard acrylic resin occlusal splints can be
"silent refluxers." GERD is a cyclical condition and not effective. Figure 6 shows casts o f the occlusal surface of
all patients who suffer from it are diagnosed during a single a maxillary occlusal splint taken 3 months apart. Wear
24-hour p H monitoring period. It is therefore possible facets can be seen developing in the occlusal surface in
that some o f the nine other patients who were not diag- the cast on the left and these have progressed signifi-
nosed with GERD and also who did not have symptoms cantly in the cast on the right This technique is valuable
may have produced evidence o f GERD if the measure- in establishing that nocturnal bruxism is the cause o f
ments had been taken at another time. attrition. Continuing to wear an acrylic resin occlusal
splint at night absorbs the wear on the splint rather than
MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT
further damaging the teeth. In severe, long-term situa-
Tooth wear is a condition that affects the patients' tions, a cobalt chromium skeleton base can be used with
dentitions for the remainder o f their lives. A lifelong occlusal surfaces in acrylic resin, which can be replaced
approach to management should therefore be taken as necessary.
rather than short-term expedient treatment measures.
MONITORING
The emphasis should be on persistent efforts to identify
the cause o f the wear and appropriate prevention insti- Monitoring by periodic clinical examination is sub-
tuted with the same enthusiasm that dietary control and jective, and objective records should be kept. These may
oral hygiene are emphasized in the prevention o f caries be photographic records or study casts. Figure 7, A and
and in the management o f progressive periodontal dis- B, shows the maxillary incisor teeth o f a 15-year-old boy
ease, respectively. Long-term monitoring is necessary to who has palatal erosion that has exposed wide areas o f
assess the effectiveness o f preventive measures and any dentin. This has become stained, showing that the ero-
further progression o f the wear before deciding whether sion is no longer active Active erosion leaves a clean,
interventive treatment is necessary. unstained surface. The teeth were not sensitive, the la-
Restorative treatment is only necessary when one o f bial appearance was not affected (Fig. 7, B) and the in-
the following criteria is met. Active treatment is prema- cisal edges have not been shortened There was there-
ture unless one of these indications is present: The pa- fore no need to treat this condition, but there was a
tient is presently concerned about his or her appearance; long-term need for continual monitoring in the event
tooth sensitivity or pain that cannot be controlled con- that the cause o f the erosion (which had not been reli-
servatively; or progressive, uncontrollable wear that is ably identified) returned
altering the occlusal vertical dimension or will make res- Figures 8 and 9 show sets of study casts taken several
Fig. 8. Cast on left was taken when patient was in his early Fig. 10. Casts on left show eroded maxillary incisor teeth and
sixties. He had just had mandibular right first molar extracted. overerupted mandibular incisor teeth, Casts on right show
Cast on right was taken 10 years later and there has been result of orthodontic treatment to depress mandibular incisor
insignificant progression of wear, which had been largely due teeth, thereby creating space for crown preparations on max-
to erosion. Until time that first cast was taken, he was eating illary incisors without reducing eroded palatal surfaces any
spicy, Asian diet, producing regurgitation. Later when his wife more. This approach produced more esthetic appearance and
died, he dramatically changed to bland diet and regurgitation is less destructive than crown lengthening and conventional
ceased. crown preparations.
years apart. Figure 8 shows that wear had not continued maining to produce retentive preparations, but in others,
and Figure 9 shows casts where it had, although treat- the wear has progressed to the point where further prepa-
ment was still not indicated. ration o f the worn surfaces would be unwise. In these
situations, the occlusion is usually disrupted and some
TREATMENT
localized orthodontic treatment to intrude the teeth,
When treatment is indicated for one of the above rea- which have supraerupted as a result o f wear, is preferable
sons, the minimum treatment necessary to solve the prob- to crown lengthening. This can be achieved by conven-
lem should be used. This will range from simple desensi- tional orthodontic treatment (Fig. 10) or by the use o f a
tizing procedures through conventional restorations to fixed Dahl appliance (Fig. l l , A, B, and C). 27,28
multiple crowns. With regurgitation erosion that has pro-
SUMMARY
gressed to the point where the incisal edges are signifi-
cantly reduced or the labial surfaces are affected, it is of- The prevalence o f unacceptable levels o f tooth wear
ten necessary to crown at least the six maxillary anterior in the United Kingdom is high, particularly in older age
teeth. In some situations, there is sufficient dentin re- groups where substantial treatment may be necessary.
REFERENCES
I. Eccles JD. Tooth surface loss from abrasion, attrition and erosion. Dent
Update 1982;9:373-81..
2. Smith BG, Robb ND. The prevalence of tooth wear in 1007 dental pa-
tients. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:232-9.
3. O'Brien. Children's dental health in the United Kingdom, 1993. HMSO
1994: 74-6.
4. Smith BG, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J
1984;I 56:435-8.
5. Donachie MA, Walls WAG. Tooth wear in an aging population in the North
East of England. J Dent Res 1991;70:684 (Abstract 125).
6. Milosevic A, S]ade P. The orodental status of anorexics and bulimics. Br
Dent J 1984;I 67:66-70.
7. Poynter E, Wright PS. Tooth wear and some factors influencing its sever-
ity. Rest Dent 1990;6:8-I I.
8. Hellstrom I. Oral complications in anorexia nervosa. Scand J Dent Rest
1977;85:71-86.
9. Hurst PS, Lacey JH, Crisp AH. Teeth, vomiting and diet: a study of the
dental characteristics of 17 anorexia nervosa patients. Postgrad Med J
1977;53:298-305.
10. Milosevic A, Slade P. Dental characteristics of anorexia and bulimia nervosa.
J Dent Res 1989;68:980 (Abstract 907).
1I. Robb ND, Smith BGN. Anorexia and bulimia nervosa (the eating disorders):
conditions of interest to the dental practitioner. J Dent 1996;24:7-I 6.
12. King WH, Tucker KM. Dental problems of alcoholic and non-alcoholic
psychiatric patients. Q J Stud Alcohol 1973;34:1208-I I.
13. Simmons MS, Thompson DC. Dental erosion secondary to ethanol-induced
emesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho11987;64:731-3.
14. Smith BGN, Robb ND. Dental erosion in patients with chronic alcoholism.
J Dent 1989;I 7:219-21.
15. Robb ND, Smith BG. Prevalence of pathological tooth wear in patients
with chronic alcoholism. Br Dent J 1990;I 69:367-9.
16. White DK, Hayes RC, Benjamin RN. Loss of tooth structure associated
with chronic regurgitation and vomiting. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:833-5.
17. Jarvinen V, Meurman JH, Hyvarinen H, Rytomaa I, Murtomaa H. Dental
erosion and upper gastro intestinal disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 1988;65:298-303.
18. Aine L, Baer N, Maki M. Dental erosions caused by gastroesophagea[ re-
flux disease in children. ASCD J Dent Child 1993;60:210-4.
19. Smith BGN, Knight JK. A comparison of patterns of tooth wear with
aetiological factors. Br Dent J 1984;I 57:16-9.
20. Gilmour AG, Beckett HA. The voluntary reflux phenomenon. Br Dent J
1993;I 75:368-72.
Fig. 11. A, Maxillary teeth have been eroded both palatally 21. Bartlett DW, Evans DF, Smith BG. The relationship between gastro-oe-
and labially by regurgitation. B, Fixed Dahl appliance bonded sophagea[ reflux disease and dental erosion [review]. J Oral Rehabil
to maxillary anterior teeth acting as simple orthodontic ap- 1996;23:289-97.
pliance to depress mandibular incisors. C, After wearing DaN 22. Bartlett DW, Evans DF, Smith BGN. Oral regurgitation after reflux provok-
ing meals; a possible cause of dental erosion? J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:102-
appliance for 3 months, clearance between maxillary and 8.
mandibular incisor teeth is achieved so crown preparations 23. Bartlett DW, Evans DF, Anggiansah A, Smith BG. A study of the associa-
can be made with minimum further palatal tooth reduction. tion between gastro-oesophageal reflux and palatal dental erosion. Br Dent
J 1996;181:125-31.
24. Bartlett DW, Smith BGN. The dental relevance of gastric reflux part I. Dent
Update 1996;23:205-8.
There is also a high amount o f erosion in children, at 25. Bartlett DW, Smith BGN. The dental relevance of gastric reflux part II.
least in the United Kingdom. Patients specifically at risk Dent Update 1996;23:250-3.
include those with eating disorders (anorexia or bulimia 26. Smith BG. A personal historical view of the management of tooth wear. Br
Dent J 1996;I 80:204-5.
nervosa), chronic alcoholics, and patients with diagnosed 27. Ricketts DN, Smith BG. Minor axial tooth movement in preparation for
and undiagnosed GERD. Posterior tooth loss is prob- fixed prostheses. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1993;I :145-9.
ably not significantly related to anterior tooth wear. 28. Ricketts DN, Smith BG. Clinical techniques for producing and monitoring
minor axial tooth movement. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1993;2:5-9.
Long-term management of tooth wear should start with
a sound differential diagnosis, strenuous efforts at pre- Reprint requests to:
vention, long-term monitoring, and proceed to active DR, B. G. N. SMITH
GUY'S HOSPITALDENTALSCHOOL
treatment only when indicated. When treatment is indi- LONDONSE1 9RT
cated, it should be limited to solving specific problems, UNITED KINGDOM
although this may well indicate extensive reconstruc-
Copyright 1997 by The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Den-
tion in s o m e s i t u a t i o n s . tistry.
0022-3913/97/$5.00 + O. 10/1/82644
Figures 6, 7a, 8, 9, and 10 were borrowed with permission from
Smith BGN, Some Facets of Tooth Wear (Ann R Austr Coil Dent Surg
1991 ;11:37-51 ).