Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Document Version 1.2 2012, March 19: 9500MPR ODU300 and MPT: available configurations
Note
The feasibility of any 9500MPR configuration with ODU300 or MPT (see MPT variants in Annex 1) not included in this document must be asked to and
confirmed by the Wireless Transmission Product Line Management.
1-Restrictions when ATPC=on ODU300
In all cases where it is requested ATPC=on, the following additional constraints must be respected:
frequency bands below 15 GHz should not be used because of the limited speed of the ATPC algorithm
| fk - fi | (28MHz + CS), where
o fk are the frequencies used by the MXC equipment
o fi are the frequencies used by any possible co-polar signal in the same area
NOTE: WE KEPT THIS, BECAUSE WE ASSUME THIS IS RELATED TO ODU BEHAVIOUR => same behavior as MXC
ATPC functionality can not be used in conjunction with the Adaptive Modulation. (Ref. 9500MPR GAD)
2-Restriction when ATPC=on MPT
ATPC functionality can not be used in conjunction with the Adaptive Modulation. (Ref. 9500MPR GAD)
3-Restriction when using a coupler to combine two ODU300s onto a single polarization
Important Note on ODU300 (Ref. 9500MXC GAD - ETSI version, chapter 33 Coupler): When using a coupler to combine two ODUs onto a single
polarization the operating channels must be chosen from within the same diplexer option (see tuning guide to identify the options per Diplexer type).If
the two ODUs are not from the same tuning/diplexer option then interference may occur, resulting in degraded link performance.
4-Restriction when using a coupler to combine two MPT ODUs onto a single polarization
Attention must be taken to avoid local interference between the two sub-bands chosen, i.e. basically above restriction 3 is valid also for MPT.
MPT can be used with 2 adjacent channels CP. Restriction in CS 28MHz, 30MHz, 40MHz, 50MHz, in 256QAM only (no pb in 56MHz/256QAM).
Behaviour: in case of adjacent/copolar channel you may see Rx threshold degradation. See adjacent channel characteristics GAD 6.2.9 and 6.2.10.
Note: in the following schemes typical values of branching loss are reported: branching loss values depending on frequency band are specified in
Table 1 (ODU300) and Table 2 (MPT) in Annex 2.
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: for implementation of configurations 5, 6 and 8 it is recommended to set as default Tx (ODU main) the higher antenna at
both the end-sites so that to avoid obstructions along the main path.
Please note that, referring to the following configurations with MPT HC and MC using dual polarized antennas, the current document release refers to
solutions with not integrated antennas and does not include any OMT solutions (see GAD 16.4).
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
1+0 1+0 1+0
(OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name)
1
AM=yes AM=yes AM=yes
|f1-f2| 1 x CS
See also above
3-Restriction when
See also above See also above
using a coupler to
at Page 1. at Page 1.
combine two ODU300s
See also above See also above
onto a single
2-Restriction when 2-Restriction when
polarization
ATPC=on MPT ATPC=on MPT
at Page 1.
at Page 1. at Page 1.
See also above
at Page 1.
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
3B
1 IDU per site 1 IDU per site 1 IDU per site
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
2+0 single-polar 2+0 single-polar 2+0 single-polar
antennas antennas antennas
(OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name)
3B
bis
AM=yes AM=yes AM=yes
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
1+1 FD dual-polar
N.A.
2+0 dual-polar antenna
(OGCAT Name)
antennas (OGCAT Name)
Not integrated
(OGCAT Name) Not integrated
antennas.
antennas.
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
2+0 dual-polar 2+0 dual-polar
2+0 dual-polar antennas antennas
antennas (OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name)
(OGCAT Name) Not integrated Not integrated
4A antennas. antennas.
bis
AM=yes AM=yes AM=yes
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
4B
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
2+0 single-polar 2+0 single-polar 2+0 single-polar
antennas antennas antennas
(OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name)
4B
bis
AM=yes AM=yes AM=yes
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
-- -- --
-- -- --
7 bis
-- -- --
-- -- --
This configuration is not allowed because f2 would be affected by great losses due to the
unequal-split coupler. -- -- --
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
N.A.
(OGCAT Name)
OGCAT Bill Of Materials
Outdoor: double ODUs
N.A. N.A.
of config. number 5;
(OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name)
antennas double-polar.
OGCAT Bill of Materials
Indoor: to be manually
arranged.
8
AM=yes AM=yes AM=yes
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
9 bis
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
10
0 dB 0 dB 0 dB
Branching Losses Branching Losses Branching Losses
Typical values (see Typical values (see Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 1) Annex 2 Table 2) Annex 2 Table 2)
Not Available
(OGCAT Name)
OGCAT Bill Of Materials
Outdoor: double BOM
Not Available Not Available
of config. number 4A
(OGCAT Name) (OGCAT Name)
bis.
12 OGCAT Bill of Materials
bis Indoor: to be manually
arranged.
|f1-f2| AND |f2-f3| AND |f3-f4| 1 x CS 1 IDU per site 1 IDU per site 1 IDU per site
Note: 4+0 AP can be downgraded to 3+0 AP.
See also above See also above
2-Restriction when 2-Restriction when
See also above ATPC=on MPT ATPC=on MPT
at Page 1. at Page 1. at Page 1.
Note: for details on mechanical implementation of this configuration (namely if to use |f1-f2| 1 x CS
external hybrid or any different solution) please refer to Wireless Transmission Product Line See also above
Management or New Product Introduction. 3-Restriction when
using a coupler to
combine two ODU300s See also above See also above
onto a single at Page 1. at Page 1.
polarization See also above See also above
at Page 1. 2-Restriction when 2-Restriction when
See also above ATPC=on MPT ATPC=on MPT
at Page 1. at Page 1. at Page 1.
14
0 dB
Branching Losses
Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 2)
2+0 XPIC
(OGCAT Name)
Not integrated
antennas.
AM=no
15
0 dB
Branching Losses
Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 2)
N.A.
(OGCAT Name)
OGCAT Bill Of Materials
can be generated
creating configuration
15, then using the
OGCAT function Copy
section** to get
optimized indoor.**
16 Not integrated
|f1-f2| 1 x CS antennas.
Differential fading (f1 vs f2) is very high for path decorrelation. Thanks to optimized modem NOT feasible NOT feasible
AM=no
profile MPT can support 1 CS of differential in XPIC.
Only in case of frequencies impaired by multipath fading (mainly low frequencies), using
adjacent channels could imply (in the worst case) that the decorrelation among the two 1 IDU per site
different paths is such that to cause a signals difference (at the receiver side) high enough to
Available starting from
generate mutual interference between the two co-polar channels.
MPR 3.1 in 28 and 56
Note: this configuration can provide protection against hardware failure if used with LAG, MHz, from R.3.4 in 40
whereas it is not suggested if protection against propagation effects is wanted (either MHz (for supported
without or whit LAG): whatever the propagation issue (high frequency --> attenuation due to modem profiles see
precipitations, low frequency --> multipath) both V and H polarizations are expected to be Technical Summary).
affected at the same time. Therefore in case of propagation issue no protection among the XPIC in conjunction
two polarizations of the same system can be envisaged. with ATPC is not
available because not
**OGCAT Wiki reference: validated. If of interest
http://wiki.app.alcatel-lucent.com/Configurator_overview#Copy_section
it can be validated
through TEC.
1(10)+1(10) dB
Branching Losses
Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 2)
2x(1+1 HSB) XPIC
unbalanced
(OGCAT Name)
Not integrated
antennas.
AM=no
17
3+3 dB
Branching Losses
Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 2)
2x(1+1 HSB) XPIC
balanced
(OGCAT Name)
Not integrated
antennas.
AM=no
17
bis
NOT feasible NOT feasible
1 IDU per site
3+3 dB
Branching Losses
Typical values (see
Annex 2 Table 2)
N.A.
(OGCAT Name)
AM=no
18
1 IDU per site
NOT feasible NOT feasible
Available starting from
MPR 3.1 in 28 and 56
MHz, from R.3.4 in 40
MHz (for supported
modem profiles see
Technical Summary).
See also above
|f1-f2| 1 x CS
at Page 1.
XPIC in conjunction
with ATPC is not
available because not
validated. If of interest
it can be validated
through TEC.
AM=no
Notes:
a) In case of failure of one ODU see detailed cases 1, 2, 3 listed here below.
b) This configuration is not suggested if protection (between V and H polarizations) against Available starting from
propagation effects is wanted: whatever the propagation issue (high frequency --> MPR 3.1 in 28 and 56
attenuation due to precipitations, low frequency --> multipath) both V and H polarizations MHz, from R.3.4 in 40
are expected to be affected at the same time. Namely: MHz (for supported
1. in case of long hops in low frequency band the space diversity counteracts the multipath modem profiles see
fading but one polarization cannot protect the orthogonal one because both V and H Technical Summary).
polarizations are expected to be affected at the same time, so no protection among the two XPIC in conjunction
polarizations can be envisaged. with ATPC is not
2. SD is not effective in case of high frequency (i.e. when rain is the most impairing effect, SD available because not
does not give benefit from the propagation point of view). validated. If of interest
it can be validated
cases 1, 2, 3 in the following pages through TEC.
3+3 dB
Branching Losses
Typical values
(seeAnnex 2 Table 2)
N.A.
(OGCAT Name)
AM=no
21
Annex 1
1) 1+1 Configuration
MPT-HC does foresee the possiblity to expand its capability thanks to a module to be plugged directly on
the outdoor unit. Currently two module are foreseen: XPIC module (to be used for XPIC configuration) and
RPS module (to be used for 1+1 configuration). The two mate MPTs are consequently interconnected
through a cable to allow the exchange og signals needed to perform XPIC or RPS functionalities
Starting from R 3.3, RPS modules 3DB1820117BA and the tight cable between two mate MPT-HC are
optional.
Default configuration for 1+1 HSB/SD/FD radio protection does not require RPS module and tight cable:
signals needed for RPS are exchanged between two mate MPTs through IDU/ODU cables and through MSS,
instead of using RPS modules and tigth cable. This is leading to a cost optimized solution both in term of
cost and in term of operations.
Only in case of mixed traffic E1 AND Ethernet, If jumbo frames (>5000 bytes) are transported with mixed
TDM traffic, the maximum number of TDM2TDMs that can be cross-connected in a given radio direction in
1+1 configuration without RPS module and tight cable is 110 E1 in channel spacing of 40 Mhz and 81 E1 in
channel spacing of 56 MHz. If no jumbo frames are transported or if the number of TDM flows is lower than
the maximum, the suggested configuration is without RPS module and tight cable. For MPT-MC, an RPS
module is not foreseen and the only possible working mode is without the tight cable between the two
mate MPTs (no changes compared to previous releases): the above limit applies to MPT-MC as well.
2) Connectivity
MPT MC offers electrical connectivity on a single CAT5 cable providing data and power.
MPT HC V2 offers both electrical connectivity on a single CAT5 cable providing data and power and optical
connectivity
3) MPT HC upgradability
Current architecture of MPT allows the user to upgrade the hardware to XPIC or 1+1 thanks to a unique
plug-in mounted directly on the outdoor itself.
The upgrade to XPIC or 1+1 can be done on field without any specific tool. The module attached to the radio
is guaranteed IP67 after mounting.
Annex 2
Note: configuration schemes report typical values of branching loss: branching loss values
depending on frequency band are specified in Table 1 (ODU300) and Table 2 (MPT).
Table 1 - Coupler for ODU 300: Losses by Band for Equal and Unequal Loss Couplers (Ref. 9500MPR GAD)
Table 2 - Coupler for MPT: Losses by Band for Equal and Unequal Loss Couplers (Ref. 9500MPR GAD) Typical values
Alcatel-Lucent - All rights reserved March 19, 2012 Page 40
Confidential
9500MPR ODU300 and MPT: available configurations v 1.2
Change Log:
Revision Issue Date Changes
1.2 2012 March 19 1> 40 MHz modem profiles with XPIC available from R.3.4 > added note.
2> Annex 1 > updated according to today MPR GAD version.
3> MPT coupler losses typical values available from MPR GAD October 2011
> Table 2 (Annex 2) replaced.