Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Quantitative research method is used in this study. And for the collection of data
questionnaire is used as instrument and scale used is strongly agree to strongly
disagree. To compute the data inferential analysis is used. The population size is 100 and
the entire respondent will be the employees of private and government educational
sectors. And research site is Punjab University, Superior University, and Educators
School. The nature of the study will be cross sectional. And more than 2 variables will be
used in this study. The questionnaire is valid and reliable because it is taken from the
site and is used before in many researches.
Analysis and result:
In this research for summarizing data descriptive analysis is used and inferential analysis
is used to find the relationship and strength between the variables. For the analysis of
data SPSS is used in addition to other suitable statistical techniques. Because it transfer
the data in the simple manner so that the researcher can easily conclude that
information provided by the selected respondents.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
The above frequency table and bar chart shows the number of participants with respect
of their gender. In the frequency table, 19 participants are female and 81 are male.
Third column of valid percent shows that 19% of female and 81% of male.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
In the above frequency table that shows the number of participants with respect of
their job level. In the frequency table, 31 participants belong to lower level of job, 53
participants belong to middle level of job and remaining 16 participants belong to top
level of job. in the column of valid percent shows that 31% of middle level job, 53% of
lower level job and 16% of top level job.
Correlations
In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between training opportunity and
employee retention or not. If the difference is greater than 0.05, means there is no
linear relationship between them then spearman correlation applies otherwise Pearson
correlation. In our analysis, the difference is 0.024 so we apply the Pearson correlation.
Correlations
Employee training
retention opportunity
N 100 100
N 100 100
In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
there is some relationship between training opportunity and employee retention.
Pearson correlation value is .386 which means the relationship is moderate because the
Spearman correlation value is in between 0.33 and 0.66.
Correlations
N 100 100
N 100 100
In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
there is some relationship between work place environment and employee retention.
The positive sign of the Spearmans test value shows that there is positive relationship
which means that if the work place environment is better in life then employee
retention is also increase in the employees mind. Spearman correlation value is .578
which means the relationship is moderate because the Spearman correlation value is in
between 0.33 and 0.66.
Participation of employees and employee retention
In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between participation of employees and
employee retention or not. The difference is 0.028 so we apply the Pearson correlation.
Correlations
Employee participation of
retention employee
N 100 100
N 100 100
In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between Reward and employee retention
or not. In our analysis, the difference is 0.061 it means there is no linear relationship
between them so we apply the spearman correlation.
Correlations
Employee
retention Reward
N 100 100
N 100 100
In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
there is some relationship between reward and employee retention. The positive sign of
the Spearmans test value shows that there is positive relationship which means that if
the reward is increase then employee retention is also increase in the employees mind.
Spearman correlation value is .794 which means the relationship is strong because the
Spearman correlation value is greater than 0.66.
Employee satisfaction and employee retention
In the above scatter plot where we find the difference of quadratic and linear line which
helps us to know either it is linear relationship between employee satisfaction and
employee retention or not. The difference is 0.037 so we apply the Pearson correlation.
Correlations
Employee Employee
retention Satisfaction
N 100 100
N 100 100
In the above table of correlation sig. value is 0.000, it means null hypothesis is rejected,
there is some relationship between employee satisfaction and employee retention.
Pearson correlation value is .374 which means the relationship is moderate because the
Spearman correlation value is between 0.33 and 0.66.
Regressions
Through regression we can predict that how much influence on dependant variable
(response) due to how much change in independent variable (predictor).
Model Summary
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
The significant value is 0.000 it means null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that there is
relationship between these variables. In the model summary table the adjusted R
square value is 14.0 %. It shows that Training Opportunity bring change by 14.9 % in on
Employee retention.
Model Summary
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
The significant value is 0.000 it means null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that there is
relationship between these variables. In the model summary table to determine that
Workplace environment influences on Employee retention. And adjusted R square value
is 38.2 %. It means Workplace environment bring change by 38.8 % in on Employee
retention.
Model Summary
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
The significant value is 0.000 it means null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that there is
relationship between these variables.
In the model summary table we can determine that how much participation of
employee influences on Employee retention. In the model summary table the adjusted
R square value is 79.6 %. It means participation of employee bring change by 89.3 % on
Employee retention.
Model Summary
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
The significant value is 0.000 it means null hypothesis is rejected. It shows that there is
relationship between these variables
Model summary table shows that how much Reward influences on Employee retention.
In the model summary table the adjusted R square value is 76.3 %. It means Reward
bring change by 76.5 % on Employee retention.
Multi regression
Model Summary
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
In the above coefficient table we can see that all these variables are below the
significant level so that all these independent variables are rejecting null hypothesis.
And all these independent variables (reward, training opportunity, employees
satisfaction, participation of employees) have 91.4 % influences on employee retention.
Excluded Variablesb
Collinearity
Statistics
Partial
Model Beta In t Sig. Correlation Tolerance
a. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), participation of employee, training opportunity, Employee Satisfaction,
reward