Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
*
G.R. No. 138822. January 23, 2001.
_______________
* THIRD DIVISION.
114
issue when it filed in its first motionthe " Motion to Strike out
Answer Compulsory Counterclaim And To Declare Defendant In
Defaultwith the trial court rather, it was only nine months
after receiving petitioners answer that respondent assailed the
trial courts lack of jurisdiction over petitioners counterclaims
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
115
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
may allow payment of said fee within a reasonable time but also
in no case beyond its applicable prescriptive or reglementary
116
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
that the trial court should have declared respondent in default for
having failed to answer her counterclaim. Insofar as the
permissive counterclaim of petitioner is concerned, there is
obviously no need to file an answer until petitioner has paid the
prescribed docket fees for only then shall the court acquire
jurisdiction over such claim. Meanwhile, the compulsory
counterclaim of petitioner for damages based on the filing by
respondent of an allegedly unfounded and malicious suit need not
be answered since it is inseparable from the
117
GONZAGAREYES, J.:
________________
1 Branch 134.
2 Docketed as Civil Case No. 893816.
3 Rollo, 4244.
4 Ibid., 5363.
5 RTC Records, 3739.
6 Ibid., 46, 93.
118
(14) That, indeed, FGUs cause of action which is not supported by any
document other than the selfserving Statement of Account dated March
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
28, 1988 x x x
(15) That it should be noted that the cause of action of FGU is not the
enforcement of the Special Agents Contract but the alleged cash
accountabilities which are not based on written agreement x x x.
xxxx
_______________
7 Ibid., 96102.
8 Ibid., 110125.
9 Judge Ignacio M. Capulong
10 Rollo, 105.
11 Fourth Division, composed of Justices Jesus M. Elbinias, ponente and
Chairman Eugenio S. Labitoria and Marina L. Buzon.
12 Rollo, 3639.
119
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 7/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
_______________
13 Ibid., 41.
14 Ibid., 332.
120
15
abandoned or declined to assert it. In the case at bar,
respondent cannot be considered as estopped from assailing
the trial courts jurisdiction over petitioners counterclaim
since this issue was raised by respondent with the trial
court itselfthe body where the action is pendingeven
before the presentation of any evidence by the parties and
definitely, way before any judgment could be rendered by
the trial court.
Meanwhile, respondent questions the jurisdiction of the
Court of Appeals over the appeal filed by petitioner from
the 18 September 1990 and 28 February 1991 orders of the
trial court. It is significant to note that this objection to the
appellate courts jurisdiction is raised for the first time
before this Court respondent never having raised this
issue before the appellate court. Although the lack of
jurisdiction of a court may be raised at any stage of the
action, a party may be estopped from raising such
questions if he has actively taken part in the very
proceedings which he questions, belatedly objecting to the
courts jurisdiction in the event that that the judgment
16
or
order subsequently rendered is adverse to him. In this
case, respondent actively took part in the proceedings
before the Court 17
of Appeals by filing its appellees brief
with the same. Its participation, when taken together
with its failure to object to the appellate courts jurisdiction
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 8/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
_______________
121
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 9/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
______________
122
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 10/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
_______________
22 Rollo, 6162.
123
_______________
124
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 12/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
_________________
125
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 13/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
31
jurisdiction over such claim. Meanwhile, the compulsory
counterclaim of petitioner for damages based on the filing
by respondent of an allegedly unfounded and malicious suit
need not be answered since it is inseparable from the
claims of respondent. If respondent were to answer the
compulsory counterclaim of petitioner, it would merely
result in the
32
former pleading the same facts raised in its
complaint.
WHEREFORE, the assailed Decision of the Court of
Appeals promulgated on 23 December 1998 and its 19 May
1999 Resolution are hereby MODIFIED. The compulsory
counterclaim of petitioner for damages filed in Civil Case
No. 893816 is ordered REINSTATED. Meanwhile, the
Regional Trial Court of Makati (Branch 134) is ordered to
require petitioner to pay the prescribed docket fees for her
permissive counterclaim (direct commissions, profit
commissions, contingent bonuses and accumulated
premium reserves), after ascertaining 33
that the applicable
prescriptive period has not yet set in.
SO ORDERED.
_______________
126
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 14/15
8/21/2016 SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME350
o0o
Copyright2016CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000156ac95e0b574726629003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 15/15