Sie sind auf Seite 1von 36

Medieval

Medieval Encounters 22 (2016) 427462 Jewish, Christian and Muslim Culture

Encounters
in Confluence and Dialogue

brill.com/me

Constantinople and the Echo Chamber: The Vlachs


in the French Crusade Chronicles

Florin Curta
Department of History, University of Florida, 25 Keene-Flint Hall, Gainesville,
FL 32611, USA
fcurta@ufl.edu

Abstract

The chroniclers of the Fourth Crusade (Geoffroi de Villehardouin, Henri de


Valenciennes, and Robert de Clari) have much to say about the Vlachs. Much of that
information results from direct contact with the Vlachs, particularly in the case of
Villehardouin and Henri de Valenciennes. However, several issues characterizing
the Vlachs, especially in Robert de Claris chronicle, are remarkably similar to stories
that may be found in Niketas Choniates. The paper analyzes the role attributed to the
Vlachs in the French chronicles, and attempts to explain the similarity to the cover-
age of things Vlach in Niketas Choniates. As such, the paper offers an examination of
all Byzantine sources mentioning the Vlachs before Choniates and of non-Byzantine
sources such as Benjamin of Tudela. The conclusion is that the image of the Vlachs in
the French chronicles derives from stories about them circulating in twelfth-century
Constantinople.

Keywords

Benjamin of Tudela Bulgaria Geoffroi de Villehardouin Henri de Valenciennes


Johannitsa Kaloyannes Niketas Choniates Robert de Clari Trojan legend Vlachs

Introduction

There is hardly any ethnic group in the medieval history of the Balkans that
has created more confusion among historians than the Vlachs. With Romanian
and Bulgarian historians arguing over the real identity of the medieval Vlachs,

koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 6|doi 10.1163/15700674-12342232

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 427 9/1/2016 9:36:45 AM


428 Curta

the accounts of the Fourth Crusade written in Old French have more often
than not been mined for historical information.1 Little, if any attention,
has so far been paid to their literary qualities. For example, many have taken at
face value the episode in Robert de Claris Conquest of Constantinople, in which
Peter of Bracheux meets a party of Vlachs and Cumans.2 Very few have noted
that in fact the episode is out of the chronological sequence in Claris narrative,
and that Peter of Bracheuxs appeal to the Trojan legend in order to justify the
crusade in terms of a patrimonial concept of state is a purely literary motif.3
The chronicles of the Fourth Crusade show that the experience of the cru-
saders in the Balkans has disrupted the mental categories that had organized
their world.4 This may explain why, in the eyes of the French chroniclers, the
Vlachs moved very rapidly from a remote and exotic position to the front
stage role of one of the main enemies of the Latin Empire of Constantinople.
Responsible for this sudden change of attitude was the victory that Johannitsa
obtained on 14 April 1205 against the crusaders at Adrianople. The capture

1 For an excellent overview of the dispute between Bulgarian and Romanian historians concern-
ing the Vlachs, see Nicolae-erban Tanaoca, O problem controversat de istorie balcanic:
participarea romnilor la restaurarea aratului bulgar, in Rscoala i statul Asnetilor, ed.
Eugen Stnescu (Bucharest: Editura tiinific i Enciclopedic, 1989), 153181.
2 Robert de Clari, La conqute de Constantinople 106, ed. J. Dufournet (Paris: Honor Champion,
2004), 200 and 202. See Benjamin Hendrickx, Recherches sur les documents diplomatiques
conservs, concernant la Quatrime croisade et lempire latin de Constantinople pendant
les premires annes de son existence (12001206) Byzantina 2 (1970): 107184 (159160);
Francesco dallAglio, Limmagine della Bulgaria in occidente al tempo della quarta crociata,
Annuario. Istituto Romeno di cultura e ricerca umanistica 5 (2003): 99100; Ovidiu Pecican,
ntre cruciai i ttari. Cretintate occidental i nomazi n Europa central-sud-estic (1204
1241) (Cluj-Napoca: Limes, 2010), 8185 and 94109; Ulrich Mlk, Robert de Clari ber den
Vierten Kreuzzug, Romanistisches Jahrbuch 61 (2011): 213222 (222); Alexandru Madgearu,
Asnetii. Istoria politico-militar a statului dinastiei Asan (11851280) (Trgovite: Editura
Cetatea de Scaun, 2014), 123.
3 Theresa Shawcross, Re-Inventing the Homeland in the Historiography of Frankish Greece:
the Fourth Crusade and the legend of the Trojan War, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies
27 (2003): 120152 (135136); Alberto Varvaro, Esperienza e racconto in Robert de Clari, in
Miscellanea di studi in onore di Aurelio Roncaglia a cinquantanni dalla sua laurea (Modena:
Mucchi, 1989), 14131427 (1425). See also Jeanette Beer, In Their Own Words. Practices of
Quotation in Early Medieval History-Writing (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2014),
61. Nikolai Markov, Balkanite pez pogleda na edin frenski ricar na nachaloto na XIII vek.
Belezhki vrkhu khronikata na Robert de Clari (Veliko Trnovo: Faber, 2008), 35 believes that
this episode is in fact an interpolation by a later author writing after 1216.
4 Sharon Kinoshita, Medieval Boundaries. Rethinking Difference in Old French Literature
(Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006), 139175 (174175).

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 428 9/1/2016 9:36:46 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 429

of Emperor Baldwin (who would eventually perish as a prisoner in Bulgaria)


pushed the Vlachs to the front of the agenda of the new power.
The first mention of the Vlachs in vernacular is in two poems of Raimbaut
de Vaqueiras: Conseil don a lemperador written in 1204, and Nom agrad
iverns ni pascors from 1205. In both, li Blac appear as enemies of Boniface
of Montferrat.5 They also appear twelve times as enemies in Villehardouins
Conquest of Constantinople, which was written at some point after 1207.6 In
the company of Bulgarians, the Vlachs are typically warriors in the armies
that Johannitsa moves against the crusaders at different moments in time.7
Together with the Cumans, they begin and finish the job in the battle at
Adrianople; ride all night long in order to reach Rousion; and take cattle and
peoplemen and womenfrom the environs of Constantinople, wreaking
havoc and making si grant essil que onques nus hom no parler de si grant.8,9
In short, Villehardouins Vlachs are always at war, which they always wage
successfully against the crusaders. Villehardouin has nothing else to say
about them and there is no close-up or description of physical appearance,

5 Joseph Linskill, The Poems of the Troubadour Raimbaut de Vaqueiras (The Hague: Mouton,
1964), 226 and 244. See also Vladimir Agrigoroaiei, The Vlachs and the Troubadour. Brief
Analysis of Three Poems by Raimbaut de Vaqueiras, Revue des Etudes Sud-Est-Europennes
47 (2009): 5574 (5758); Sergio Vatteroni, Blacs e Dragoiz. Valaques et Sklavnes dans un
pome de Raimbaut de Vaqueiras, Romania 131 (2013): 467472.
6 As the last event mentioned in his chronicle is the death of Boniface of Montferrat,
Villehardouin must have finished his work after 1207, but nothing is known about the exact
date either of his composition or of his death. Out of six manuscripts of the chronicle, the ear-
liest three are dated to the thirteenth century. See Jean Dufournet, Prsentation, in Geoffroy
de Villehardouin, La conqute de Constantinople, ed. J. Dufournet (Paris: Flammarion, 2004),
28 and 34. For Villehardouins usage of Blas and Blac, see Giuseppe Stabile, Valacchi e
Valacchie nella letteratura francese medievale (Rome: Nuova cultura, 2010), 9497.
7 Villehardouin, Conqute 352, p. 228; 459, p. 290.
8 Villehardouin, Conqute 359 and 363, pp. 232 and 234; 406, p. 260; 419, p. 268. For the analy-
sis of Villehardouins account of the battle at Adrianople, see Kaloian Andonov, Voennoto
delo i voiskata na blgarite v predstatvite na Zhofroa do Vilarduen, Rober do Klari i Anri do
Valansien, in Omnia vincit amor. Iubileen sbornik na NGDEK v chest na prof. Vasilka Tpkova-
Zaimova, ed. V. Vachkova and C. Stepanov (Sofia: Universitetsko izdatelstvo Sv. Kliment
Okhridski, 2008), 363384 (365367). Boris Primov, Crearea celui de-al doilea arat bulgar
i participarea vlahilor, in Relaii romno-bulgare de-a lungul veacurilor, ed. M. Berza and
E. Stnescu, 2 vols. (Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste Romnia, 1971), 1:955
(51) believed the participants in the battle of Adrianople to have been Vlachs from the lands
north of the river Danube.
9 Villehardouin, Conqute 363, p. 234; 407, p. 260; 407, p. 261; 410, p. 263.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 429 9/1/2016 9:36:46 AM


430 Curta

weapons, or character.10 This is suprising, given that Villehardouin most


certainly had the opportunity to see the Vlachs in the battle at Adrianople.11
The only character standing out of the Vlach crowd is Johannitsa, the rois de
Blasquie et de Bougerie (sometimes only rois de Blasquie).12 He is also often
depicted in a military context, but Johannitsa has his own gonfanon that he
puts on display on the walls of Adrianople.13 He also ahas discretionary powers
over the Cumans, and sappers at his disposal.14 His despotic behavior is appar-
ent in the execution of his captives, some of whom he has lured on his side by
means of gifts.15 That, according to Villehardouin, is mortel trason.16 But not
everything about him is bad. Villehardouin describes Johannitsa as a rich and
clever king.17 He even calls Vlachia la terre Johannis.18
The name of the country, Blaquie, also appears in Henri de Valencienness
History of Emperor Henry of Constantinople, which was written a few years
after Villehardouins chronicle, if not at the same time.19 Like Villehardouin,

10 By contrast, the Cumans nestoient mie baptis (Villehardouin, Conqute 352, p. 228).
11 Villehardouin, Conqute 362, p. 234. For Villehardouin as a witness, see Michel Zink,
La subjectivit littraire. Autour du sicle de saint Louis (Paris: Ecriture, 1985), 20910; Beer,
In Their Own Words, 4041.
12 Villehardouin, Conqute 273, p. 186; 276, p. 186; 333, p. 220; 350, p. 228; 374, p. 240; 389,
p. 248; 399, p. 254; 404, p. 258; 442, p. 280; 497, p. 311. For rois de Blasquie, see Villehardouin,
Conqute 311, p. 206; 335, p. 220; 345, p. 226; 352, p. 228; 359, p. 232; 371, p. 238; 392, p. 250;
412, p. 262; 413, p. 264; 424, p. 271; 443, p. 280; 444, p. 280; 451, p. 286; 456, p. 288; 459, p. 290;
461, p. 290; 472, p. 298; 475, p. 299.
13 Villehardouin, Conqute 273, p. 186; 311, p. 206; 350, p. 228; 352, p. 228; 355, p. 230; 371, p. 238;
374, p. 240; 389, p. 250; 392, p. 250; 413, p. 264; 424, p. 271; 442, p. 280; 444, p. 282, 456, p. 288;
459, p. 290; 461, p. 290. Johannitsa has siege machines, which he brings under the walls of
Serres (Conqute 394, p. 252).
14 Villehardouin, Conqute 359, p. 232; 389, p. 248; 472, p. 298.
15 Villehardouin, Conqute 345, p. 226; 394, p. 252; 401, p. 256. The prisoners from Aspros and
Rhodostos were all transported to Blasquie (Villehardouin, Conqute 414, p. 264; 416,
p. 266). See also Dufournet, Les crivains, 285289.
16 In Villehardouins eyes, he is similar in that respect to the Greeks who are typically des-
loial. Gilles A. Chosson, Chronique dune qute inacheve: tude du significant pique et du
signifi mythique dans la Conqute de Constantinople de Geoffroi de Villehardouin, (Ph.D.
diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 2004), 122123.
17 Villehardouin, Conqute 202, p. 144; 276, p. 186; 404, p. 258. For the meaning of sage
as intelligent, but especially clever, see Charles Brucker, Sage et sagesse au Moyen Age
(XIIe et XIIIe s.). Etude historique, smantique et stylistique (Geneva: Droz, 1987), 221223.
18 Villehardouin, Conqute 451, p. 286. Vlachia is son pas, where where li Blac
live (Villehardouin, Conqute 399, p. 254; 493, p. 308).
19 Henri de Valenciennes, Histoire de lEmpereur Henri de Constantinople 505, ed. J. Longnon
(Paris: Paul Geuthner, 1948), 29. The terminus ad quem for the History is the date of Emperor

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 430 9/1/2016 9:36:46 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 431

Henri de Valenciennes regards the Blaquie as the country of its ruler Burile
(Boril), but calls it Great Vlachia (Blakie la Grant) in anticipation of its
conquest by Emperor Henry I.20 Much like in Villehardouin, the Vlachs appear
eighteen times in the History always in military action. They invade Emperor
Henrys lands, and attack the crusaders at Philippopolis, shooting at them their
arrows huant et glatissant et faisant une noise si grant kavis estoit que toute
la plaigne en tremblast.21 They sound the trumpets before entering the battle,
and have green swords with long blades made in Bohemia.22 Nonetheless, they
can be easily defeated and scattered, like larks when the sparrow hawks are
approaching.23 There is even a comparison between the crusaders and the
Vlachs: while, under the leadership of Emperor Henry I, the former are like
well-trained falcons, the Vlachs are like birds of prey that could never be tamed
and thus cannot be used for hunting.24
Unlike Villehardouin, Henri de Valenciennes has two Vlach characters in
focus. On one hand, Burile is the mirror image of Villehardouins Johannitsa:

Henrys death (June 11, 1216). Jean Longnon, Introduction, in Henri de Valenciennes,
Histoire, 12 believes that Henri de Valenciennes finished the History by September 1209,
when Peter of Douai, whose vassal Henri may have been, returned to Flanders. See also
Franois Zufferey, Henri de Valenciennes, auteur du Lai dAristote et de la vie de Saint
Jean lEvangeliste, Revue de linguistique romane 68 (2004), 335358 (349). Henri de
Valencienness work has long been treated as a continuation of Geoffroi de Villehardouin,
primarily because it actually appears after the latters Conquest of Constantinople in five
manuscripts, the earliest of which are dated to the thirteenth century. See Peter M. Schon,
Studien zum Stil der frhen franzsischen Prosa (Robert de Clari, Geoffroy de Villehardouin,
Henri de Valenciennes) (Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann, 1960), 73 and 104.
20 Valenciennes, Histoire 505, p. 29; 548, p. 49. Like Johannitsa, Boril is the ultimate trahi-
tour, qui empereur se faisait contre Dex et raison (Valenciennes, Histoire 528, p. 40). Jean
Dufournet, Robert de Clari, Villehardouin et Henri de Valenciennes, juges de lempereur
Henri de Constantinople. De lhistoire la lgende, in Mlanges de littrature du Moyen
Age au XXe sicle offerts Mademoiselle Jeanne Lods, ed. N. Cazauran (Paris: Ecole Normale
Suprieure de Jeunes Filles, 1978), 183202 (201) believes that as such he is the exact oppo-
site of boin empereour Henri (Valenciennes, Histoire 527, p. 39).
21 Valenciennes, Histoire 504, pp. 2829; 515, pp. 3435; 518, p. 35; 519, p. 36. Jean Dufournet,
Henri de Valenciennes et la Quatrime Croisade, in Image et mmoire du Hainaut
mdival, ed. J.-Ch. Herbin (Valenciennes: Presses Universitaires de Valenciennes, 2004),
3350 (42), notes that the Old French verb glatir (which refers to the barking of a dog)
also appears in the Song of Roland.
22 Valenciennes, Histoire 536, p. 43; 532, p. 41.
23 Valenciennes, Histoire 521, p. 36; 540, p. 45.
24 Valenciennes, Histoire 520, p. 36.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 431 9/1/2016 9:36:46 AM


432 Curta

a usurper who has made himself king against God and reason.25 On the other
hand, Esclas (Slav) is a hault home worthy of Emperor Henrys military
assistance.26 He marries the daughter of the emperor, who then promises to
make him segnour of his own country.27 When requesting the hand of the
princess, Slav boasts of being a man sufficiently rich in land, silver, and gold,
whom people in his own country see as a genteel man.28 But before sending
his daughter off to Slav, Henry gives her a pep talk, to warn her that her future
husband was somewhat savage (auques sauvages).29 He stresses the fact
that she would not be able to understand his language, nor he hers, despite the
fact that previous scenes have depicted Emperor Henry in direct dialogue with
Slav, apparently without any translator.
Nor is any translator mentioned in the episode of Peter of Bracheuxs meet-
ing with Johannitsa and his Vlachs and Cumans. The episode appears in Robert
de Claris Conquest of Constantinople, written at some point after the death of
Emperor Henry in 1216.30 Johannitsa and his Cumans, while raiding Henrys
lands, camped about two miles away from the emperors army. Having heard
about monseigneur Pierron de Braiechoel et de sa boine chevalerie, the
Vlachs and the Cumans decided to send envoys and ask for a meeting. Peter
obliged and as he was approaching the Vlachs, Johannitsa came out to meet
him together with his haus hommes de Blakie. They all greeted Peter and
welcomed him, even though they had a hard time looking at him, for he was

25 Valenciennes, Histoire 689, p. 419.


26 Valenciennes, Histoire 505, p. 29. Apparently, Emperor Henry wanted to go against Boril,
car Johanisses, ses [Borils] oncles, li avoit occis son [Henrys] frre lempereour Bauduin
(Valenciennes, Histoire 504, p. 28). This is the only mention of Villehardouins bte noire,
Johannitsa.
27 Valenciennes, Histoire 548, p. 49.
28 Valenciennes, Histoire 547, p. 49.
29 Valenciennes, Histoire 558, p. 54. According to Erica Jo. Gilles, Nova Francia?: Kinship and
Identity Among the Frankish Aristocracy in Conquered Byzantium, 12041282, Ph.D., diss.
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 61 and 68, to Henri de Valenciennes,
the cultural distance between crusaders and Vlachs was far greater than between crusad-
ers and Greeks.
30 Beer, In Their Own Words, 57. The only extent manuscript of Claris chronicle is GKS 487 2
from the Royal Library in Copenhagen (available online at http://www.kb.dk/da/nb/
materialer/haandskrifter/HA/e-mss/gks-2_487.html, accessed 25 March 2015), which is
dated to the late thirteenth or early fourteenth century. See Markov, Balkanite (see above,
note 6), 14; Ulrich Mlk, Robert de Clari. Bemerkungen zu einer neuen Ausgabe der
Conqute de Constantinople und zur Kopenhagener Handschrift, Zeitschrift fr romanische
Philologie 124.1 (2009): 97108; Mlk, Robert de Clari ber den Vierten Kreuzzug
(see above, note 2), 214.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 432 9/1/2016 9:36:46 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 433

very tall. After some conversation, they asked Peter why he had come to their
country to conquer lands. In reply, Peter asked whether they knew about how
the great Troy was destroyed, and by what means. Ba ouil! fisent li Blak et li
Commain, who, while acknowledging that they knew about it, noted that that
was ancient history. Troy, Peter then claimed, belonged to our ancestors, for
some of those who had escaped from Troy had settled in the lands from which
the crusaders had now come. In other words, they had come to take what was
rightly theirs.31
Robert de Clari did not see the Vlachs in battle, for he had already
returned to France by the time of Johannitsas victory over Emperor Baldwin
I at Adrianople. Like Villehardouin, Robert de Clari describes Johannitsa as a
rich man with great power and consistently calls him the Vlach (Jehans li
Blakis).32 He also knows that Johannitsa was once a sergeant of the emperor,
having charge of one of the emperors horse farms.33 Every time the emperor
would demand it, Johannitsa would send to him sixty or one hundred horses.
He would also come to court once a year. One day, however, as he presented
himself to the emperor in Constantinople, an imperial official struck him
in the face.34 Upset over the offense, Johannitsa left the court in anger and
returned to his country. In Vlachia he began to gather around him the haus
homes de Blakie and soon the inhabitants of Vlachia recognized him as their
lord.35 Johannitsa also went to the Cumans, managed to become their friend
and to obtain their military assistance, and thus became their lord as well.36
He now wanted international recognition and sent envoys to the crusad-
ers asking to be recognized as king in his own, in exchange for his alliance
against Constantinople. He promised military assistance in the form of 100000

31 Clari, Conqute (see above, note 2) 106, pp. 200 and 202. Troy is first mentioned in chapter 40,
where Clari claims that Abydos (Bouke dAve), at the entrance into the straight of
St. George, is the site of great Troy. Peter of Bracheux is also Robert de Claris superhero,
the man who, of all rich and poor, performed the greatest number of deeds of prowess,
thus becoming the epitome of French chivalric values.
32 Clari, Conqute 65, p. 142. Rike hons is not the same as haut home. Johannitsa, in other
words, was a man of means, a powerful man. See Peter F. Dembowski, La Chronique de
Robert de Clari. Etude de la langue et du style (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press,
1963), 71.
33 Clari, Conqute, 64, p. 142; English version from The Conquest of Constantinople, trans.
E. H. McNeal (New York, NY: Octagon Books, 1966), 87.
34 Clari, Conqute, 64, p. 142. Robert was not sure about the identity of the official: he was
either a eunuch (uns escouills) or an usherer (uissiers) of the emperor.
35 Clari, Conqute 65, p. 142.
36 Clari, Conqute 65, pp. 142 and 144.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 433 9/1/2016 9:36:46 AM


434 Curta

armed men.37 After taking counsel, the barons of the crusading army decided
to reject Johannitsas request.38 However, he dispatched envoys to Rome and
the pope sent a cardinal to crown him.39 Johannitsas country thus became
li roiaumes de Blakie.40
At his death, power in Vlachia was assumed by Boril (Burons, Burus),
the rois de Blakie. In a belated attempt to recognize the power of the Vlach
ruler, Emperor Henry decided to ask for Borils daughter in marriage, even if
he had previously rejected the idea of taking a wife of such low origin. He had
meanwhile been advised by his barons to take her, for the Vlachs were now the
greatest power in the region, if not in the world.41
Where did the chroniclers of the Fourth Crusade find their information
about the Vlachs? Their coverage of things Vlach is remarkably similar to that of
the late twelfth-century chronicle attributed to Ansbertus, who deals with the
participation of Frederick Barbarossa and his army in the Third Crusade. After
crossing the Danube and leaving Branievo on 11 July 1189, the imperial army
moved across that most lengthy forest of Bulgaria, where the Greeklings,
Bulgarians, Serbs, and the semi-barbarous Vlachs (Flachos semibarbaros) lay
in ambush, springing forth from their secret lairs to wound those who were last
into camp and the servant who went out to collect edible plants or fodder for
the horses with poisoned arrows.42 By the time the crusading army was cross-
ing the Balkans, Kalopeter the Vlach and his brother Asen with the Vlachs
subject to them were exercising tyrannical rule over much of Bulgaria, and
especially in the region where the Danube flows into the sea.43 Kalopeter is

37 Clari, Conqute 64, p. 142.


38 Clari, Conqute 65, p. 144.
39 Clari, Conqute 65, p. 144.
40 Clari, Conqute 116, p. 210.
41 Clari, Conqute 116, p. 210.
42 Historia de expeditione Friderici imperatoris, in Quellen zur Geschichte des Kreuzzuges
Kaiser Friedrichs I., ed. A. Chroust, MGH SRG Nova Series 5 (Berlin: Weidmann, 1928),
28; English version adapted from The Crusade of Frederick Barbarossa. The History of
the Expedition of Emperor Frederick and Related Texts, transl. G. A. Loud (Farnham and
Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010), 60. The name Ansbertus appears in a colophon describ-
ing the individual in question as a churchman from Austria, who can hardly have been
responsible for the entire chronicle. The anonymous author of the portion of the chron-
icle in which the Vlachs appear was most likely a participant in Fredericks crusade. See
Arnold Bhler, Der Kreuzzug Friedrich Barbarossas 11871190. Bericht eines Augenzeugen
(Stuttgart: Jan Thorbecke, 2002), 48.
43 Historia de expeditione, 33; English version from The Crusade of Frederick Barbarossa, 64.
Whatever political meaning the term tyranny may have had for the German author,

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 434 9/1/2016 9:36:47 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 435

most likely Peter, Johannitsas older brother, who is said to have sent letters and
messengers to Frederick Barbarossa. Much like Robert de Claris Johannitsa,
he promises faithful (military) assistance (fidelis auxilium).44 Later in that
same year, he asked the emperor for the crown of the kingdom of Greece in
exchange for the military assistance of 40000 Vlachs and Cumans armed with
bows and arrows.45 It is unlikely that Ansbertus inspired Robert de Claris
account.46 The source of his information about Johannitsa seeking recognition
must be sought elsewhere.
The same applies to the exchange of letters between Pope Innocent III and
Johannitsa. In a letter dated between late December 1199 and January 1200, the
pope claims that he has heard that the lineage of your ancestors has its ori-
gins in the noble city of Rome, and that you have taken from them, as if by
hereditary right, both the generosity of the blood and the inclination towards
the sincere devotion that you have for the Apostolic See, I have for a long
time intended to send you letters and envoys.47 This passage has often been
used as evidence that the Vlachs were aware of their Roman origins.48 Others

or the geographical extent of the polity over which the early Assenids ruled, it is impor-
tant to note that (Kalo-)Peter is given the epithet the Vlach, in the same way Robert de
Clari would later call Johannitsa li Blaquis. It is also obvious that to say that Kalopeter,
Asen and their Vlachs exercised tyrannical rule over Bulgaria expresses a Byzantine, not
German point of view.
44 Historia de expeditione, 33.
45 Historia de expeditione, 58; English version from The Crusade of Frederick Barbarossa, 84.
46 Parts of the History of Emperor Fredericks Expedition survive in two manuscripts, one
written in the Abbey of St. Lamprecht in Styria, the other from the Abbey of Milevsko in
Bohemia. Both are dated to the early thirteenth century (Bhler, Der Kreuzzug (see above,
note 42), 48; Loud, Introduction, 1).
47 Innocent III, ep. 255, in Die Register Innocenz III., vol. 2, ed. O. Hageneder, W. Maleczek,
and A. A. Strnad (Rome and Vienna: Verlag der sterreichischen Akademie der
Wissenschaften, 1979), 485: Nos autem audito, quod de nobili urbis Rome prosapia
progenitors tui originem traxerint et tu ab eis et sanguinis generositatem contraxeris et
sincere devotionis affectum, quem ad apostolicam sedem gens quasi hereditario iure,
iampridem te proposuimus litteris et nuntiis visitare. That this was the first letter of the
exchange between Pope Innocent III and Johannitsa has already been recognized by
Dietmar Hintner, Die Ungarn und das byzantinische Christentum der Bulgaren im Spiegel
der Register Papst Innozenz III. (Leipzig: St. Benno-Verlag, 1976), 22.
48 Nicolae Bnescu, Un problme dhistoire mdivale: cration et caractre du Second Empire
Bulgare (1185) (Bucharest: Cartea Romneasc, 1932), 77; Robert Lee Wolff, The Second
Bulgarian Empire: Its Origin and History to 1204, Speculum 24 (1949): 167206 (190191);
Petre t. Nsturel, Vlacho-balcanica, Byzantinisch-neugriechische Jahrbcher 22 (1977
1984): 221248 (233); Vasile Mrcule, aratul vlaho-bulgar ntre Bizanul ortodox i

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 435 9/1/2016 9:36:47 AM


436 Curta

have treated the story of the Roman origin of the Vlachs as concocted by the
papal chancery in an effort to convince Johannitsa to recognize the papal
primacy.49 While it is certainly not easy to separate compliment from Realpolitik,
how did Pope Innocent III learn about the Roman origin of Johannitsas lin-
eage? The fact that he was of Roman origin does not seem to have initially
been on Johannitsas mind. In a letter of mid-1202, he expresses his gratitude
to the pope for having reminded him of his blood and homeland (presumably
Rome).50 This, on the other hand, is a letter said to have been translated from
Bulgarian into Greek, and from Greek into Latin, the language of the surviv-
ing copy. The letter abounds in biblical citations, all in the same paragraph in
which Johannitsa acknowledges his Roman origin.51 When it comes to ances-
tors, Johannitsa has in mind his predecessors Peter (927969) and Samuel
(9971014), who had allegedly received crowns from Rome, as he was able to
learn from our books.52 In other words, he regarded himself a descendant of
Bulgarian emperors and not Roman settlers.
Where then did Pope Innocent III find the information about the Roman
origins of Johannitsa? The formula commonly applied in papal letters to

Occidentul catolic n timpul domniei arului Ioni Asan (11971207), Buletinul Muzeului
Militar Naional 6 (2008): 2338 (23); Madgearu, Asnetii, 110.
49 Fedor I. Uspenskii, Obrazovanie Vtorago Bolgarskago carstva (Odessa: Pechatano v
tipografii G. Ulrikha, 1879), 210211.
50 Innocent III, ep. 114, in Die Register Innocenz III., vol. 5, ed. O. Hageneder, C. Egger,
K. Rudolf, and A. Sommerlechner (Vienna: Verlag der sterreichischen Akademie der
Wissenschaften, 1993), 225. By contrast, the Archbishop Basil of Trnovo appears to have
learned much quicker what the pope wanted to hear. In his letter of the mid-1202, the
archbishop calls Johannitsa and all his subjects descendants of Roman blood (ep. 116, in
in Die Register Innocenz III., vol. 5, 230).
51 Bringing us back to the memory of our blood and homeland is in fact a biblical allusion
(Genesis 48:21). Francesco dallAglio, Innocenzo III e i Balcani: fede e politica nei Regesta
pontifici (Naples: Universit degli Studi, 2003), 52 n. 65 notes that another biblical quote at
the beginning of the letter (Psalms 18:11) is also used in the letter the Serbian ruler Vukan
sent to the pope in July or August 1199 (Innocent III, ep. 167, in Die Register Innocenz III,
vol. 2, 324). In that letter, Vukan claimed that he was not only of royal descent, but also a
relative of the pope. The parallel between the two cases is too strong to be accidental.
52 Innocent III, ep. 114, in Die Register Innocenz III., vol. 5, 226. This, of course, is pure
invention and propaganda: Peter and Samuel never received any crowns from Rome.
On the other hand, in his letter of September 8, 1203 (or later), Johannitsa claims the
Peter, Samuel, and Symeon had been emperors of both Bulgarians and Vlachs. See epp. 6,
in Die Register Innocenz III., vol. 7, 19; 4 (of September 1203), in Die Register Innocenz III.,
vol. 7, 14; Ivan Duichev, Prepiskata na papa Inokentiia III s blgarite, Godishnik na
Sofiiskiia Universitet Kliment Ohridski 38.3 (1942): 3109 (84).

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 436 9/1/2016 9:36:47 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 437

indicate the source of information (pervenit ad audientiam nostra, or some


variation of the same53) is replaced in the 1199 letter with a clear reference
to hearsay. The news about Johannitsas Roman origins most likely did not
come from his country, but from trustworthy sources elsewhere. I shall return
later to the Byzantine origin of the idea that the Vlachs are of Roman ori-
gin, but for the moment I will suggest that the popes informants were from
Constantinople, quite possibly from among the Latins who lived in that city
long before its conquest in 1204.54 As a matter of fact, Innocent wrote to the
Latins in Constantinople, as a group, and his letter suggests that he was well
informed about secular and ecclesiastical affairs in the Byzantine capital.55
But what was known in Constantinople about the Vlachs? The earliest
mention of the Vlachs in a Greek narrative source is the prescriptive hand-
book conventionally known as the Strategikon of Kekaumenos, which was
most written during the reign of Michael VII Dukas (10711078), but after the
death of Patriarch John Xiphilinos in August 1075.56 According to Kekaumenos,

53 E.g., epp. 89 of June 21, 1199 (Die Register Innocenz III, vol. 2, 187), in which Innocent men-
tions having learned about the ultrage and corporal damage done to the bishop of Vc
(Hungary); 249 of 1517 December 1199 (Die Register Innocenz III, vol. 2, 475), in which
Innocent explains how he has learned about King Lewon of Armenias conquest of
Baghra (Gaston) from the Templars; and 254 of late December 1199 or early January 1200
(Die Register Innocenz III, vol. 2, 484), in which the pope announces that he had learned
about Hartmann, a cleric from Lorch, who had been robbed by a canonicus named Albert.
54 Gnter Prinzing, Die Bedeutung Bulgariens und Serbiens in den Jahren 12041219 im
Zusammenhang mit der Erstehung und Entwicklung der byzantinischen Teilstaaten nach
der Einnahme Konstantinopels infolge des 4. Kreuzzuges (Munich: Institut fr Byzantinistik
und neugriechische Philologie, 1972), 2931, argues that the information came either
from Serbia or from Hungary, but attributes the whole issue to Johannitsas attempt to
imitate the presumed claims to Roman ancestry of the Byzantine aristocratic families.
Stergios Latsios, Die Konstruktion der Vlachen von 1640 bis 1720, in Vergangenheit und
Vergegenwrtigung. Frhes Mittelalter und europische Erinnerungskultur, ed. H. Reimitz
and B. Zeller (Vienna: Verlag der sterreichischer Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2009),
205227 (207) believes that while the idea that the Vlachs are of Roman origin originated
in Byzantium, it was Johannitsa (and not Pope Innocent III) who got it from there, namely
during the two years or so that he spent in Constantinople as a hostage. Needless to say,
there is no evidence either for this information originating in Serbia or Hungary, or for
Johannitsa aping the Byzantine aristocracy or boasting about his Roman origin (before
being reminded about that by Pope Innocent III).
55 Innocent III, ep. 204 of November 16, 1199, in Die Register Innocenz III., vol. 2, 399400.
56 Charlotte Rouech, Defining the Foreign in Kekaumenos, in Strangers to Themselves. The
Byzantine Outsider. Papers from the Thirty-Second Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies.
University of Sussex, Brighton, March 1998, ed. D. C. Smythe (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000),

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 437 9/1/2016 9:36:47 AM


438 Curta

in ancient times the Vlachs were called Dacians and Bessi, and he describes
their migration from the northern parts of the Balkan Peninsula into cen-
tral Greece.57 He has otherwise only bad things to say about the race of the
Vlachs. They are:

entirely untrustworthy, and corrupt, and keep true faith neither with
God, nor with the Emperor, nor with a relative or a friend, but endeavor
to do down everyone, tell many lies and steal a great deal, swearing every
day the most solemn oaths to its friends, and violating them easily, per-
forming adoptions of brothers and baptismal alliances, and scheming by
these means to deceive simpler people.

They are very cowardly, with the hearts of hares, but with bravadoand even
this comes from cowardice.58 Much ink has been spilled on this passage and
on the significance of its testimony for the history of both Romanians and the
Balkan Vlachs.59 However, the description of the Vlachs is modeled on a psogos

20314 (204). The work survives in only one manuscript copied in or near Trebizond in
the fourteenth century. It contains edifying maxims, tips on household management and
social relations, as well as counsel about serving as judge in the provinces. The author
appears to have been a senior commander in the Byzantine army, and to have been edu-
cated in grammar and rhetoric, albeit not at the highest level.
57 Kekaumenos, Strategikon IV 187, ed. M. D. Spadaro (Alessandria: Edizioni dellOrso, 1998),
226. It is important to note that unlike Pope Innocent III, Kekaumenos does not describe
the Vlachs as of Roman origin. By contrast, he insists that they have never been loyal to
anyone, not even to old emperors like Trajan, who defeated them. This strongly suggests
that in the late eleventh century the idea of the Vlachs being of Roman origin was not
sufficiently popular to be used in a handbook such as Kekaumenoss.
58 Kekaumenos, Strategikon IV 187, pp. 224 and 226; English version from Rouech, Defining
the Foreign, 211.
59 See, for example, Mtys Gyni, Loeuvre de Kkaumenos, source de lhistoire roumaine,
Revue dhistoire compare 23 (1945): 98180; George C. Soulis, The Thessalian Vlachia,
Zbornik radova Vizantolokog Instituta 8.1 (1963): 271273; Mihai Sptrelu, Opera lui
Kekaumenos i importana ei pentru istoria romnilor, Glasul Bisericii 44.79 (1985):
522532; Neagu Djuvara, Sur un passage controvers de Kekaumenos, Revue Roumaine
dHistoire 30.12 (1991): 2366; Ilona Czamaska, Problem pochodzenia Woochw, in
Wdrwka i etnogeneza w staroytnoci i redniowieczu, ed. M. Salamon and J. Strzelczyk
(Cracow: Towarzystwo Wydawnicze Historia Iagellonica, 2004), 327335 (327). For the
older literature, see Adolf Armbruster, Romanitatea romnilor. Istoria unei idei, 2nd ed.
(Bucharest: Editura enciclopedic, 1993), 27, n. 28.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 438 9/1/2016 9:36:47 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 439

or invective, the seventh exercise in the progymnasmata.60 The leading fea-


ture of the race of the Vlachs is apistia, the lack of faith either in God or in the
Emperor. Given that the Strategikon survives in only one manuscript, it is likely
that Kekaumenoss ideas about the Vlachs were not known in later centuries.
Any similarity between his portrait of the Vlachs and later descriptions may be
attributed not to his creation of a stereotype, but to his use of an already exist-
ing clich for his own rhetorical purposes.
Anna Comnena, who finished her Alexiad in 1148, relates that when
the Cumans crossed the Danube in 1094, Emperor Alexius Comnenus was
informed about their movements by a certain Poudila, who was a chieftain
of the Vlachs.61 At the same time, however, the Cumans learned the route
through the mountains passes from (other) local Vlachs.62 One is vaguely
reminded here of Kekaumenoss idea that the Vlachs are completely unreli-
able, scheming by these means to deceive simpler people. In another pas-
sage, Anna relates that in March 1091, Emperor Alexius ordered Nicephorus
Melissenos to raise an army against the Pechenegs, who had invaded the
Balkans. Melissenos recruited soldiers from among Bulgarians, but also those
who live a nomadic life and are called in vernacular Vlachs.63 A little later,
the recruits piled their baggage on ox-wagons, together with all necessary sup-
plies and went to Emperor Alexius in Chirenoi. As soon as they approached the
imperial army, however, the scouts mistook them for a Scythian (Pecheneg)
horde.64 Much has been made out of the phrase nomadic life used in rela-
tion to the Vlachs, presumably in reference to their transhumant form of

60 Rouech, Defining the foreign, 212, who notes that the use of a rhetorical device is fur-
ther betrayed by reference to Dio Cassius in relation to Trajans wars with the Dacians.
Dio Cassiuss work was in circulation in Constantinople in the second half of the
eleventh century, which suggests that Kekaumenos may have lived and written there
(Gyni, Loeuvre de Kkaumenos, 160167).
61 Anna Comnena, Alexiad X 2.6, ed. D. R. Reinsch and A. Kambylis (Berlin and New York,
NY: Walter de Gruyter, 2001), 286.
62 Anna Comnena, Alexiad X 3.1, p. 287.
63 Anna Comnena, Alexiad VIII 3.4, p. 242.
64 Anna Comnena, Alexiad VIII 4.5, p. 244; English version from Anna Comnena, The Alexiad,
transl. E. R. A. Sewter (London and New York, NY: Penguin, 1969), 255. These events took
place on the eve of the battle at Lebunion (April 29, 1091), where the Pechenegs were deci-
sively defeated. For Scythians as Pechenegs, see Paul Meinrad Strssle, Das Feindbild
der Petschenegen im Byzanz der Komnenen (11./12.Jh.), Byzantinische Forschungen 28
(2004): 297313 (302).

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 439 9/1/2016 9:36:47 AM


440 Curta

pastoralist economy.65 In reality, Annas intention may have nothing to do


either with transhumance, or with Vlach pastoralism. The Bulgarian and Vlach
recruits looked like nomads, because they moved around like the Pechenegs,
namely on wagons.
The Vlachs also appear, albeit indirectly, in the Prodromic poems written
in the 1160s or 1170s.66 The third poem makes fun of a cobbler in Constantinople,
who can afford buying expensive things for his breakfast, including Vlach
cheese.67 The Vlach cheese also appears in the fourth poem in a long recipe for
a lavish feast at a monastery, along with such exotic and expensive ingredients
as the underbelly of a Mediterranean moray, sturgeon filet, pepper, and sweet
wine.68 The Vlachs are also mentioned in the History of John Kinnamos, written
at some point after 1176.69 According to Kinnamos, they were drafted for Leo
Vatatzess 1166 expedition against Hungary, for they were are said to be settlers

65 Mtys Gyni, La transhumance des Vlaques balkaniques au Moyen Age, Byzanti-


noslavica 12 (1952): 2942 (3536), who believed that the information about those who
live a nomadic life, otherwise called Vlachs in vernacular, must have come from the
decree issued by Alexius I in 1091. That the Vlachs were not truly nomads, at least not
in Annas eyes, results from her mention of Ezeban, a Vlach village lying quite close to
Andronia, between Larissa and Trikala (Anna Comnena, Alexiad V 5.3, p. 154; English ver-
sion from Sewter, 168). For Ezeban, see Mtys Gyni, Egy vlach falu neve Anna Komnene
Alexiasban, Egyetemes Philologiai Kzlny 71 (1948): 2230.
66 Margaret Alexiou, The Poverty of criture and the Craft of Writing: Towards a
Reappraisal of the Prodromic Poems, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 10.1 (1986):
140 (25); Hans Eideneier, Ptochoprodromos. Einfhrung, kritische Ausgabe, deutsche
bersetzung, Glossar (Cologne: Romiosini, 1991), 38. The mention of a Vlach mantle in the
third poem (Ptochoprodromos III 273, in Eideneier, Ptochoprodromos, 135) is attested in
two late manuscripts of the Prodromic poems dated to or after the mid-fifteenth century.
This is therefore a later addition and cannot be used to draw any conclusions about the
image of the Vlachs in twelfth-century Constantinople. See Eideneier, Ptochoprodromos,
230; Markta Kulhnkov, Ich bin auch eines schicken Mantels wert. Zum Manteltopos
in der griechischen Literatur, in Epea pteroenta. Ren Dostlov k narozeninm,
ed. M. Kulhnkov and K. Loudov (Brno: Host, 2009), 191200 (195196); Gyni, La trans-
humance, 30; Petre t. Nsturel, Les Valaques de lespace byzantin et bulgare jusqu la
conqute ottomane, in Les Aroumains (Paris: Langue dO, 1989), 4578 (67).
67 Ptochoprodomos III 113114 and 117118, in Eideneier, Ptochoprodromos, 122.
68 Ptochoprodromos IV 210211, in Eideneier, Ptochoprodromos, 149150.
69 Paul Magdalino, The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos 11431180 (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1993), 1820. See also Iakov N. Liubarskii, John Kinnamos As a Writer,
in Polypleuros nous. Miscellanea fr Peter Schreiner zu seinem 60. Geburtstag, ed. C. Scholz
and G. Makris (Munich /Leipzig: K. G. Saur, 2000), 164173.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 440 9/1/2016 9:36:47 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 441

brought in ancient times from Italy.70 This has often been interpreted as an
indication that Kinnamos had learned about this information from the Vlachs
themselves.71 He may have drawn instead on Dio Cassius, according to whom
Trajan founded cities there (in Dacia).72 That the Vlachs are specifically said
to be the old settlers from Italy (and not their descendants) suggests, however,
a different interpretation. Colonists from Italy settled in the Balkans, as well as
in Dacia. The Vlachs may have been useful to Leo Vatatzes as settlers claiming
their old lands in the province of Dacia, now occupied by Hungarians. If so,
this rationalization was, of course, Kinnamoss construction, with little, if any
relation to Leo Vatatzess real reasons. In other words, what mattered at this
point for Kinnamos was to show off his knowledge of Roman (imperial) history,
as he expected his equally educated audience to know that the empire once
ruled over the lands north of the river Danube through which the Byzantine
troops were now moving against the Hungarians. This is definitely not too
far-fetched a hypothesis, given the surge of interest in Roman history in late
eleventh- and twelfth-century Byzantium.73 At any rate, Kinnamoss comment
on the Roman origin of the Vlachs strongly suggests that their exotic character,

70 John Kinnamos, Epitome rerum ab Ioanne et Alexio Comnenis gestarum, ed. A. Meineke
(Bonn: E. Weber, 1836), 259260. This is in fact the first mention of the Roman origin
of the Vlachs, and following Dimitrie Onciul, Romanian historians have traditionally
used it to write national history under the assumption that the Vlachs in question were
those of the lands north of the Danube, in present-day Romania. See Dimitrie Onciul,
Scrieri istorice, 2 vols. (Bucharest: Editura tiinific 1968), 1:104, 146, 161, 199, 273, 326, and
597; 2:202203 and 263; Alexandru D. Xenopol, Teoria lui Roesler. Studii asupra struinei
romnilor n Dacia Traian (Iai: Tipografia Naional, 1884), 117118; erban Papacostea,
Les Roumains et la conscience de leur romanit au Moyen Age, Revue Roumaine
dHistoire 4.1 (1965): 1524 (19).
71 Armbruster, Romanitatea, 31.
72 Dio Cassius, Roman History LXVIII 14.3, ed. H. B. Foster, trans. E. Cary (Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, 1927), 387. The implication is that the inhabitants of those cities
were settlers, some brought from Italy.
73 Attaleiates traced the origins of Byzantine law and the model for virtuous warfare to the
Roman Republic. Zonaras also expressed interest in the history of the Republic. Tzetzess
Letters and Histories are full of Roman stories. For all three examples, see Anthony
Kaldellis, Hellenism in Byzantium. The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception
of the Classical Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 62, 300, and
305. Kaldellis estimates that over a third of the exempla in twelfth-century texts are from
Roman history.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 441 9/1/2016 9:36:47 AM


442 Curta

as perceived in Constantinople, was an intellectual construction, and not the


result of a direct contact with, or even knowledge of things Vlach.74
No mention of the Roman origin of the Vlachs appears in Niketas Choniatess
orations or in his History, on which he was still working when he died in or
shortly after 1217.75 Like Kinnamos, Choniates wants to show off his knowl-
edge of ancient geography when claiming that Vlachs were formerly called
Mysiansa reference to the imperial Roman province of Moesia (inferior).76
Combining two biblical citations, he echoes Kekaumenos in describing
the Vlachs as an unfaithful nation, ready to break any oaths.77 However,
Choniatess Vlachs are a serious enemy, the Other par excellence. They are demon-
inspired barbarians who rejoice in rising in rebellion against the emperor.78
Initially reluctant and turning away from open revolt because of the magnitude
of the undertaking, they had to be convinced by their leaders through unusual
methods. Peter and Asen built a house of prayer (euktrion) in the name of the
Good Martyr Demetrios and gathered there many demoniacs (daimonolptn)
of both races [Vlach and Bulgarian]; with crossed and bloodshot eyes, hair
disheveled, and with precisely all the other symptoms demonstrated by those

74 This is in sharp contrast to the administrations view of the Vlachs. A prostaxis of


Emperor Andronicus I dated to February 1184 for the benefit of the Lavra Monastery at
Mount Athos mentions the descent of Vlach shepherds from the mountains of Moglena
into the plainthe first detailed description of Vlach transhumance. The Vlachs are
exempted from taxes in the entire theme of Moglena. See Paul Lemerle, Andr Guillou
and Nicolas Svoronos, Actes de Lavra (Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1970), 341345 (344); Nsturel,
Les Valaques balkaniques, 101; Tom Winnifrith, The Vlachs. The History of a Balkan People
(New York, NY: St. Martins Press, 1987), 119. For the prostaxis, see also Mark C. Bartusis,
Land and Privilege in Byzantium. The Institution of Pronoia (Cambridge and New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press, 2012), 5558.
75 Alicia Simpson, Niketas Choniates. A Historiographical Study (Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2013), 13 and 23.
76 Niketas Choniates, Historia, ed. J.-L. van Dieten (Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter,
1975), 131; English version from O City of Byzantium. Annals of Niketas Choniates, transl.
H. J. Magoulias (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1984), 74. Similarly, Choniates
occasionally calls Hungarians either Paiones or Pannones, in addition to Ouggroi, Ounnoi,
or Gpaides, for which see Lajos Berkes, Die Ungarn bei Niketas Choniates, Acta Antiqua
Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 51 (2011): 353371 (358).
77 Niketas Choniates, Orat. II, in Nicetae Choniatae Orationes et Epistulae, ed. J.-L. van Dieten
(Berlin and New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 1972), 9. The citations are from Luke 9:41
(O faithless and perverse generation...) and Matthew 12:39 (an evil and adulterous
generation).
78 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 371 and 368. For the rebellious Vlachs (apostatai Blachoi), see
also Historia, 435.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 442 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 443

possessed by demons. The demoniacs were instructed to say that, God had
consented to the freedom of the race of the Bulgars and Vlachs and assented
that they should shake off after so long a time the yoke from their neck.79
At a first glimpse, Choniates appears to say that the rebels took Gods name
in vain, since they needed the demoniacs to tell the people that they were
not free. He almost casts doubt on the rebels faith. However, elsewhere he
acknowledges that the Vlachs were fellow Christians.80 Moreover, the scene of
the possessed soothsayers is meant as a preamble for the story about how the
first Byzantine victories were obtained against the Vlachs. Taking advantage of
a solar eclipse (most likely that of 21 April 1196), the Byzantines took the Vlachs
by surprise to send them scurrying in panic. The rebels ran violently to the
river Danube like the herd of swine in the Gospels who ran into the sea.81
The point of the story is, of course, that the Vlachs were essentially pigs, irra-
tional animals that acted as if possessed by demons.82 The episode of the
possessed soothsayers was only a way to explain how the demons got into
the pigs.
Thir leaders, Peter and Asen went to Kypsella to ask the emperor to grant
them an estate near the mountains, which would provide them with a little

79 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 371; English version from O City of Byzantium, 205. For the chro-
nology of those events, see Gnter Prinzing, Demetrios-Kirche und Aseniden-Aufstand.
Zur chronologischen Przisierung der Frhphase des Aseniden-Aufstandes, Zbornik
radova Vizantolokog Instituta 38 (19992000): 257265. Choniatess rhetorical skills and
the precision of his supposedly ethnographic description have encouraged scholars to
interpret the scene of the possessed as an ancient parallel to nestinarstvo, a fire ritual
performed in many villages in southeastern Bulgaria, Strandzha, and Macedonia, which
involves demonstrations of mediumship in trance (Malingoudis, Die Nachrichten, 110).
That Choniatess readers may have not interpreted the scene of the possessed ethno-
graphically results from the fact that a fourteenth-century paraphrase of this passage
refers to the soothsayers as participants in the Eleusinian mysteries (Alexandru Elian and
Nicolae-erban Tanaoca, Izvoarele istoriei Romniei III. Scriitori bizantini (sec. XIXIV)
(Bucharest: Editura Academiei RSR, 1975), 257 with n. 43).
80 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 504.
81 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 372373; English version from O City of Byzantium, 206.
The reference here is to the episode of the Gergesene (or Gadarene) demoniac(s) healed
by Jesus, who transferred the unclean spirits into a herd of swine that ran off the cliff into
the Sea of Galilee, and drowned (Matthew 8:32; Mark 5:13; Luke 8:33).
82 Simpson, Niketas Choniates, 328. Choniates also calls the Cumans legions of spirits in
reference to the same episode of the Gadarene demoniac (Niketas Choniates, Historia,
374; English version from O City of Byzantium, 206; Luke 8:30).

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 443 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


444 Curta

revenue.83 Rebuffed and insulted (Asen was struck across the face at the order
of John Dukas as a punishment for his barbarian insolence), the two brothers
returned to their abodes, and incited the entire nation to rise in rebellion.84
When the Romans obtained their first victories against the Vlach, both Peter
and Asen were among the pigs running violently to the Istros. However, after
recruiting Scythians as auxiliaries, Asen returned to his homeland, which
he found emptied of Roman troops. He thus marched in at the head of his
Cuman allies with even greater braggadocio.85 The third brother, Johannitsa,
is consistently called the Mysian (ho Mysos Ianns), a perfect mirror image
of Robert de Claris Jehans li Blakis.86 His political profile in the History is
defined not only in relation to the Byzantines, but also to the crusaders who
have meanwhile arrived in the neighborhood.87 He even sends envoys to the
crusaders on a mission of friendship, but is snubbed and told to address
the Latins not as an emperor would address his friends, but as a servant his
masters, in this way being demoted to his former station. Otherwise, they
[the crusaders] would bear arms against him and ravage Mysia...since he had
rebelled against his Roman lords.88
Choniates associates the Vlachs and their rulers with mountains.89 They
occupy the rough ground and inaccessible places.90 Their fortresses are

83 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 369; English version from O City of Byzantium, 204. For Peter
and Asen asking for a pronoia, see Bartusis, Land, 98101.
84 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 369; English version from O City of Byzantium, 204.
85 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 374; English version from O City of Byzantium, 206. One is
vaguely reminded here of what Kekaumenos has to say about Vlach bravado based on
cowardice.
86 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 618, 627, and 635.
87 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 619; English version from O City of Byzantium, 339: he is both
an enemy and an avenger of the Romans.
88 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 613; English version from O City of Byzantium, 336.
89 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 375, 394, 397, and 512. Peter lives, like the deer, in the high
mountains (Niketas Choniates, Orat. IX, in: Nicetae Choniatae Orationes et Epistulae,
91). Dobromir Chrysos puts his faith in the rocks along which he moves. He looks like
being carved in the mountain or, like a statue, in rock. In short, he is a mountaineer (ho
oreibats: Niketas Choniates, Orat. XI, in Nicetae Choniatae Orationes et Epistulae, 109). For
the image of the (Stara Planina) mountains in the Byzantine historiography concerning
the Second Bulgarian Empire, see Kiri Marinow, Hemus jako baza wypadowa i miejsce
schronienia w okresie walk o restytucj pastwowoci bugarskiej pod koniec XII i na
pocztku XIII w., in Cesarstwo bizantyskie dzieje, religia, kultura : studia ofiarowane pro-
fesorowi Waldemarowi Ceranowi przez uczniw na 70-lecie jego urodzin, ed. P. Krupczyski
and M. J. Leszka (d: Leksem, 2006), 181199.
90 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 372; English version from O City of Byzantium, 206.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 444 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 445

situated directly above sheer cliffs and have newly built walls marked off
at intervals by crowned towers.91 Mysia is a country in the vicinity of the
Mount Haimos (Stara Planina), and as such it has fields, with crops gathered
in heaps which Isaac II Angelos set on fire in 1186.92 The Vlachs descend the
Mount Haimos and fall unexpectedly upon the Roman towns, killing many and
carrying away a great number of prisoners and goods.93 They leave the heights
on which they move like deer, and gather from the mountains like the sons of
Abraham.94
The comparison of the Vlachs with deer in the high mountains also appears
in the travelogue of Benjamin of Tudela, a rabbi who journeyed from his native
Navarre all the way to Baghdad and back between 1160 and 1171/2.95 However,
the text of the Sefer Masaot (Book of Travels) is the result not of Benjamins
travel or personal experiences, but of (at least) two redactions, the earliest
of which was done by an editor living in thirteenth-century Spain, who also
added a prologue.96 This text belongs to a genre of Jewish medieval literature

91 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 368 and 429; English version from O City of Byzantium, 204
and 236. The best fortified and most excellent of all cities along the Haimos is Trnovo.
The city is built on a ridge of the mountain, has mighty walls, and is divided by a river
(Niketas Choniates, Historia, 471; English version from O City of Byzantium, 258).
92 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 368 and 373; English version from O City of Byzantium,
204 and 206. Mysia is the name of the country over which both Peter (Niketas Choniates,
Historia, 472) and Johannitsa (Niketas Choniates, Historia, 613 and 628) ruled. Choniates also
knows the name Vlachia, which he employs as a terminus technicus (megal Blachia) for a
region in the highlands above Thessaly (Niketas Choniates, Historia, 638).
93 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 372.
94 Niketas Choniates, Orat. VII, in Nicetae Choniatae Orationes et Epistulae, 62. The reference
to the sons of Abraham is from Matthew 3:9.
95 Stefan Schreiner, Jdische Reisen im Mittelalter (Leipzig: Sammlung Dieterich, 1991), 175;
David Jacoby, Benjamin of Tudela in Byzantium, Palaeoslavica 10.1 (2002): 180185 (182);
Franois-Xavier Fauvelle-Aymar, Desperately Seeking the Jewish kingdom of Ethiopia:
Benjamin of Tudela and the Horn of Africa (Twelfth Century), Speculum 88.2 (2013):
383404 (385). For the possibility that Benjamin of Tudela is simply the invention of
a later compilator (the author of the prologue) who may have recycled scattered travel
notes attributed to one Binyamin, see Giancarlo Lacerenza, Appunti sulla letteratura di
viaggio nel Medioevo ebraico, in Medioevo romanzo e orientale. Il viaggio nella lettera-
ture romanze e orientali. V Colloquio Internazionale VII Convegno della Societ Italiana di
Filologia Romanza. Catania-Ragusa, 2427 settembre 2003, ed. G. Carbonaro, M. Casarino,
E. Creazzo, and G. Lalomia (Soveria Manneli: Rubbettino, 2006), 427452 (441).
96 David Jacoby, Benjamin of Tudela and his Book of Travels, in Venezia incrocio di culture.
Percezioni di viaggiatori europei e non-europei a confronto. Atti del Convegno, Venezia, 2627
gennaio 2006, ed. K. Herbers and F. Schmieder (Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura,

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 445 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


446 Curta

known as travel narrative, and consists of a list of entries, each with the fol-
lowing structure: And from there, there are x (number) of days or y (number)
of parasangs to w (place name), which is called z (Jewish name). To this basic
structure, comments are often added concerning the size, social structure, and
specific details about the Jewish community in w, as well as the names of
their leaders, where there was a sufficiently large number of Jews to constitute
a minyan (a quorum necessary for worship).97
Benjamin crossed Greece from Corfu to Thebes, Halmyros, and Thessaloniki
in 1161. One of his stops, at a days journey from Rabonica (Ravennika)
was in Sinon Potamo, near present-day Lamia, in Phthiotis. There were about
fifty Jews in the town at the time, led by rabbi Shelomoh and rabbi Yaaqov. A
digression on the Vlachs follows:

This [place] is at the foot of the mountains [of] Vlachia (blkyh), on which
mountains dwell the people called Vlachs (blkzyn), and they are as swift
as deer, descending from the mountains to plunder and loot the country
of Greece (Javan). And no man can climb up to them to fight, and no king
can rule over them, and they do not hold fast to the Christian religion,
and they call themselves by Jewish names. And it is said that they were
Jews and call the Jews our brothers, [and that] when they meet them,

2008), 135164 (140). According to Giancarlo Lacerenza, Struttura letteraria e dinamiche


compositive nel Sefer Massaot di Binyamin da Tudela, Materia giudaica 12.12 (2007):
8998 (97), the author of the prologue may have worked in Castile under King Alfonso X
el Sabio (reg. 12521284). The latest revision, which was probably done in France, appears
in the earliest extant manuscript, which, long believed to be of a thirteenth-century
date, is in fact from the fourteenth century (Jacoby, Benjamin of Tudela and his Book of
Travels, 140). For a brief description of all manuscripts, see Libro de viajes de Benjamn de
Tudela, transl. J. R. Magdalena Nom de De (Barcelona: Riopedras Ediciones, 1989), 1617.
97 Rolf Schmitz, Benjamin von Tudela Das Buch der Reisen. Realitt oder Fiktion, Henoch
16.23 (1994): 295314 (299); Juliette Sibon, Benjamin de Tudle, gographe ou voya-
geur? Pistes de relecture du Sefer massaot, in Gographes et voyageurs au Moyen Age,
ed. H. Bresc and E. Tixier du Mesnil (Nanterre: Presses universitaires de Paris ouest,
2010), 207223 (223). See also Immaculada Prez Martin, Ficcin y realidad en las nar-
raciones hispanas de viajes a Bizancio, in Mare nostrum. Viajeros griegos y latinos por
el Mediterrneo, ed. J. L. Arcaz Pozo and M. Montero (Madrid: Delegacin de Madrid
de la Sociedad Espaola de Estudios Clsicos, 2012), 175197 (181). For travel narrative,
see Giuliano Tamani, La letteratura ebraica medievale (secoli XXIII) (Brescia: Morcelliana,
2004), 147148.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 446 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 447

they steal from them, but do not kill them the way they kill the Greeks,
and they do not accept any religion.98

There is a remarkable parallel here to Choniatess comparison between the


Vlachs and mountain deer. This, however, is not the only description of moun-
tain people in the Sefer Masaot. The Druses of Lebanon are said to be pagans
of a lawless character. They inhabit the mountains and the clefts of the rock;
they have no king or ruler, but dwell independent in these high places.99 The
Druses are at war with the men of Sidon, who are of course the Christian
Franks.100 No Jews live among the Druses, but some Jewish artisans and dyers
travel through their country occasionally for the sake of trade, for the Druses
are favorable to the Jews. They roam over the mountains and hills, and no
man can do battle with them.101 No fewer than five elements are common to
Vlachs and Druses: they are lawless (i.e., they have no religion); no king rules
over either group; they are friendly to the Jews; they are at war with Christians;
and no man can go up and do battle with them. The accounts of Vlachs and
Druses are so similar that one may well have served as model for the other.
The image of the Vlachs swooping down from the mountains is also simi-
lar to that of Jews in the country of Baden, who are not under the yoke of
the Gentiles, but possess cities and castles on the summits of the mountains,
from which they make descents to raid the Christian kingdom of Amatum,
or Nubia. The Jews take spoils and booty (from the Christians) and retreat

98 Marcus N. Adler, Sefer Masaot shel R. Binyamin (London: Henry Frowde, 1907), 1213;
English version adapted from Lucian-Zeev Herscovici and Eugen Pentiuc, References to
the Carpatho-Danubian Region in Hebrew Sources of the 10th12th Centuries, Romanian
Jewish Studies 1.2 (1987): 517 (13). Herscovicis translation of the passage is slightly differ-
ent from that in The Itinerary of Benjamin of Tudela, transl. M. N. Adler (New York, NY:
Philipp Feldheim, 1907), 11. Most importantly, Herscovici takes blkyh to be an adjective
modifying the noun mountains, although the accompanying Romanian translation of
the same text implies that blkyh (Vlakiah) is the name of the mountains (the Romanian
translation is taken from Victor Eskenasy, Izvoare i mrturii referitoare la evreii din
Romnia (Bucharest: Hasefer, 1986), 3). The reference to Vlachs being swift as deer is a
citation from 2 Samuel 2:18.
99 Itinerary, 18.
100 For Crusader Sidon, see Rudolf Hiestand, Die Herren von Sidon und die Thronfolgekrise
des Jahres 1163 im Knigreich Jerusalem, in Montjoie. Studies in Crusade History in Honour
of Hans Eberhard Mayer, ed. B. Z. Kedar, J. Riley-Smith and R. Hiestand (Aldershot:
Ashgate, 1997), 7790.
101 Itinerary, 18.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 447 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


448 Curta

to the mountains, and no man can prevail against them.102 Again, the idea
appears that no man can go up and do battle with the mountaineers, albeit
in a slightly different form. Both Vlachs and Ethiopian Jews descend from their
respective mountains to raid and to despoil the neighboring Christian coun-
tries. The descriptions of Vlachs and mountain Jews open with the names of
the countries in which those people liveVlachia and Baden, respectively.
This is an unusual feature, as country names (as opposed to city names) do
not normally open anecdotes attached to entries in the Sefer Masaot. For the
mountain Jews, at least, this may be an indication of a much later addition
to the text, probably by its last editor. Indeed, while most authors have identi-
fied the Jews of Baden with the Falasha communities of northern Ethiopia,
there is no mention of any Ethiopian Jews prior to 1300.103
Could the description of the Vlachs be of an equally late date? In my opin-
ion, the answer must be affirmative for a number of reasons. First, when com-
pared, the position of the description of the Vlachs in the general economy of
the segment of Benjamins travel between Rome and Constantinople is very
different from that of the description of the Druses in the segment of his trip
between Constantinople and Jerusalem. The latter is spiced with anecdotes and
commentaries, which are abundant both before and after the description of
the Druses.104 There are no such anecdotes in the segment of the trip between
Corfu and Constantinople. In other words, the description of the Vlachs breaks
the paramount concern with the presence of Jewish communities in the most
unusual way. It is therefore likely that the description of the Vlachs is a later
addition to the text, perhaps by one of the editors, who modeled it after the
description of the Druses.105 If so, then the date for that description cannot be
1161 (the year in which Benjamin presumably traveled through Greece), but a
much later date after 1173 (the year in which Benjamin died). Assuming the first
editor of the Sefer Masaot, who was also the author of the prologue, worked

102 Itinerary, 67; Binyamin da Tudela, Itinerario (Sefer massaot), transl. G. Busi (Rimini 1988), 74.
Baden is the ancient name of Ethiopia.
103 Fauvelle-Aymar, Desperately seeking, 398, notes that there is no mention of Ethiopian
Jews in the otherwise abundant information of the Cairo Geniza.
104 E.g., the description of the Assassins and Samaritans before and after the Druses, respec-
tively (Itinerary, 18).
105 Judging by the fact that the description of the Vlachs is similar to that of the Ethiopian
Jews, which was almost certainly inserted into the text after 1300, it is possible that the
former was also of a similar date. But since the greatest degree of resemblance is with the
description of the Druses, which is most likely part of the oldest version of the text, it is
equally possible that the description of the mountain Jews in Ethiopia was modeled at a
later date (after 1300) after both that of the Druses and that of the Vlachs.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 448 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 449

in Castile, then the description of the Vlachs must be of a thirteenth-century


date, i.e., after the Fourth Crusade and the conquest of Constantinople.106
It has long been claimed that Benjamin of Tudela is the first source to men-
tion the name of the country in which Vlachs live.107 However, the earliest
use of Vlachia for a province of the Empire (provintia Blachie) is in the
gazetteer of provinces open for trade, which is included in the chrysobull
that Emperor Alexius III Angelos issued for the Venetians in November 1198.108
The division of the Empire between the crusaders of 1204 and the Venetians
employed the provincial names as rendered in Emperor Alexiuss chrysobull.109
It is from that division that the chroniclers of the Fourth Crusade
Villehardouin, Henri de Valenciennes, and Robert de Claritook the idea
of a country named Vlachia, although they applied that name to a different
province of the (formerly Byzantine) Empire. It is likely from that same
source that the author of the Sefer Masaot learned about Vlachia. Moreover,
like the chroniclers of the Fourth Crusade, he transferred to the country of the
Vlachs near Sinon Potamo the political and religious features associated with
the other Vlachia, much farther to the north. That the Vlachs were as swift as
deer when descending from the mountains to plunder and loot the country of
Greece applies best to the political and military conflict between the Assenids
and the emperors of the Angelos dynasty.110 It is, after all, an image that could
have just as well been lifted from Choniatess History. If the information concern-
ing the name of the country (Vlachia) originated in Constantinople, then it is
equally possible that the image of the Vlachs as descending from the mountains
to attack Byzantium also came from the capital of the Empire. Was the informa-
tion available to the chroniclers of the Fourth Crusade from the same source?

106 Such an assumption is primarily based on the use of the Castilian plural and Castilian
equivalents to Hebrew and other names (Jacoby, Benjamin of Tudela and his Book of
Travels, 143). For example, the Byzantines are called Grizianos or Grigos, in addition
to Javan, the traditional Jewish name for Greece (or Greeks) based on the table of
nations in Genesis 10.
107 Nsturel, Les Valaques de lespace byzantin, 53.
108 A Latin translation of the chrysobull survives in two manuscripts in the state archives
of Venice. For the mention of provincia Valachie in the text of the Latin translation,
see Marco Pozza and Giorgio Ravegnani, I trattati con Bisanzio 9921198 (Venice: Il Cardo,
1993), 130. The province of Blachie mentioned in the chrysobull was located next to
Mount Othrys, and included the lands around Lamia, Domokos, and Halmyros.
109 For Vlachia in the text of the partitio Romaniae, see Antonio Carile, Partitio terrarum
Imperium Romaniae, Studi Veneziani 7 (1965): 127305 (161, 221, and 281282).
110 Herscovici and Pentiuc, References, 13.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 449 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


450 Curta

To be sure, there is no description in Villehardouin of deer-like Vlach


descending from the mountains. Villehardouin uses Blasquie et Bougerie,
instead of just Blasquie in politically important contexts, perhaps because
of his participation in the negotiations leading to the partitio Romaniae of
1204, in which the name Blachia was reserved for a (formerly Byzantine)
province in central Greece. He also mistakes Johannitsa for the son of Isaac II
Angelos and the nephew of Alexius III Angelos, but it is impossible to tell
where this wrong information may have originated, as there is no parallel to
that in any contemporary source. To Villehardouin, the Vlach ruler was a type,
whose actions are described and condemned, but who is never given a voice.111
There is in fact no direct speech of Johannitsa, the Vlachs or the Cumans.112
By contrast, Henri de Valenciennes uses direct speech very often. The major-
ity of the sixty instances of direct speech in his History may be found in the
middle of the work, where the Vlachs appear together with their leaders, Boril,
and Slav. If Villehardouin identifies Vlachia with its ruler, Johannitsa, to Henri
de Valenciennes Borils name may be used as an adjective for identifying the
Vlachs, as a wholethe Boril people (la gent Burile).113 The country is
called Blaquie if the ruler is Boril and Blakie la Grant if, God willing, Emperor
Henry is going to defeat Boril and replace him with Slav.114 As both a haut
hom respected in his country and the hom of Emperor Henry, Slav is suf-
ficiently qualified to receive the hand of an imperial princess in marriage, and
to rule over Blakie la Grant, even if he remains somewhat savage. Henri de
Valencienness Vlachs are never compared with deer, but instead with birds,
either larks scattered at the approach of the sparrow hawks, or bruhiers

111 Dufournet, Robert de Clari, 188190 suggests that Villehardouins Johannitsa is just a
prop to highlight Emperor Henrys qualities and merits.
112 Beer, In Their Own Words, 372 notes that the most informative and frequent examples of
Villehardouins use of direct speech come from the first 200 paragraphs, i.e. before the
Vlachs and Johannitsa enter the story. Direct speeches in the latter part of the Conquest of
Constantinople record pleas for help, often against Johannitsa and the Vlachs.
113 Valenciennes, Histoire 528, p. 40.
114 That Blakie la Grant is in fact the same thing as Blaquie results from two manu-
scripts of Henri de Valencienness History, which replace the former with le roiaume de
Blaquie. See Kiril Zhuglev, Kakvo razbira Valasien pod Blaquie i Blakie-le-Grant, Izvestiia
na muzeite ot Iugoiztochna Blgariia 2224 (1948): 159169; Prinzing, Die Bedeutung
Bulgariens, 122 with n. 13; Madgearu, Asnetii, 156. Despite the great resemblance of
names, Great Vlachia is definitely not the region in the highlands above Thessaly men-
tioned by Niketas Choniates, Historia, 638. Nor can Henri de Valencienness usage be
attributed to concerns over the terminology borrowed from the partitio Romaniae of 1204.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 450 9/1/2016 9:36:48 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 451

that cannot be tamed for hunting.115 Both comparisons suggest that Henri de
Valenciennes had in mind an audience familiar with falconry.116 To own fal-
cons in early thirteenth-century France was a sign of social distinction and
birds of prey were sometimes treated as prizes at tournaments.117 By 1200,
the image of a falcon swooping to catch its prey has already become a stock
comparison for the knight charging against his enemies.118 After that, one way
to point out that not every rustic is destined to become a knight is to say that
one cannot turn a bruhier into a falcon.119 To Henri of Valencienness audi-
ence, therefore, the Vlachs appeared as no real match for the crusaders. With
only one retainer following him, Emperor Henry jumped on his horse Moriel,
spurred it into battle, and killed the first Vlach he encountered. When scolded
by Peter of Douai for his foolish behavior, the emperor recommends that lais-
sommes les Blas a tant, et tornons vers Phinepople.120 The Vlachs are just not
worth all that trouble. Why then is the bulk of the material in the History about
Vlachs and Cumans, especially in the first part? The answer may be found in
the long speech delivered by Emperor Henry before the battle at Philippopolis.
In that speech, Henry asks God for the victory against Vlachs and Cumans,
so that revenge may be taken on them.121 One could think of Baldwin as the
main reason for Henrys desire to take revenge on the Vlachs and the Cumans,
but the field sermon at Philippopolis depicts them as enemies of both Empire
and Church.122 This has been rightly interpreted as crusading propaganda.

115 Valenciennes, Histoire, 540 and 520, pp. 45 and 36.


116 The earliest Old French manuscripts containing treaties of falconry have been dated
to the thirteenth century. See An Smets, La mise en recueil des traits de fauconnerie
mdivaux en latin et en langue vernaculaire (franais et espagnol), Reinardus 23 (2010
2011): 163185 (180182).
117 Baudouin van den Abeele, La fauconnerie dans les lettres franaises du XIIe au XIVe sicle
(Louvain: Leuven University Press, 1990), 2022, 78, and 95.
118 Abeele, La fauconnerie, 149. The stereotype of larks fleeing the attack of the sparrow
hawk is already present in Chanson dAntioche, ca. 1180 (Chanson dAntioche 273, l. 6704,
ed. S. Duparc-Quioc (Paris: P. Geuthner, 1976), 331). For hunting larks with sparrow hawks
in the thirteenth century, see Abeele, La fauconnerie, 150.
119 Abeele, La fauconnerie, 203.
120 Valenciennes, Histoire 513, p. 33. According to Dufournet, Henri de Valenciennes, 44, the
name of Emperor Henrys horse is mentioned as if he were the hero of a chanson de geste.
121 Valenciennes, Histoire 529, p. 40.
122 Valenciennes, Histoire 5234, pp. 3738. As Aglio, Innocenzo III, 150 with n. 289 notes, in
a letter sent to his brother Geoffroy in September 1206, Henry actually called Johannitsa
sancte cruces inimico and curie et sancte romane ecclesie inimicus. In another let-
ter sent to Pope Innocent III in 1208, after the battle at Philippopolis, Henry also called
Boril iniquissimus persecutor ecclesie dei (Aglio, Innocenzo III, 157). For crusading as

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 451 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


452 Curta

Ovidiu Cristea has even suggested that the emphasis on Vlachs and Cumans
in the History is meant to justify the very existence of the Latin Empire of
Constantinople as a bastion against infidels.123 That, ultimately, is why Boril
is said to have made himself emperor against God and reason and why the
Vlachs sound their trumpets before battle, as if trusting their multitude more
than God.124
The crusade may have also been on the mind of Robert de Clari. There is a
greater concern with the Saracens in his Conquest of Constantinople than in
Villehardouin or Henri de Valencienness works. The Saracens appear eight
times in the text, more than the Vlachs. The first references to both groups,
however, are remarkably symmetrical. Kyrsac (Isaac), one of the three Angelos
brothers persecuted by Andronicus I, flees to a country called Blakie, while
another brother goes to Antioch et fu pris des Sarrasins par une chevauchie.125
Andronicuss biography, on the other hand, is also connected to the Saracens.
He has been sent by Emperor Manuel to bring to Constantinople la reine
Teudore de Jherusalem, qui se seurs estoit. But Andronicus raped the queen,
and then fled with her to Konya, among the Saracens. 126 This is, of course,
a story Robert de Clari invented most likely on the basis of the story of Lucretia
being raped by Sextus Tarquinius.127 Later in the narrative, the sultan of Konya,
having heard about the deeds of the crusaders at Constantinople on behalf of
Alexius, requests their assistance for taking back power from his (the sultans)
brother, who has usurped his land and seigniory of Konya.128 In addition, the
sultan promised to convert to Christianity, together with his men, and offered
the crusaders plenty of his own wealth. His request was nonetheless rejected
on pragmatic grounds, namely that the crusaders still had to get their reward
from the emperor (Alexius IV Angelos), and it would be dangerous to leave

vengeance between 1198 and 1216, see Susanna A. Throop, Crusading as an Act of
Vengeance, 10951216 (Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2011), 117143.
123 Prinzing, Die Bedeutung Bulgariens, 121 with n. 9; Ovidiu Cristea, Epilogul Cruciadei a
IV-a. Perspectiva lui Henri de Valenciennes, Revista de istorie 13 (2002): nos. 12, 243253
(244245).
124 That, in other words, may be a reference to Ezekiel 7:14.
125 Clari, Conqute 21, p. 76.
126 Clari, Conqute 20, p. 74.
127 Bertrand Rouzis-Lonardi, Le roman dAndronic, du bouc lagneau, in Mimtisme,
violence, sacr. Approche anthropologique de la littrature narrative mdivale, ed.
H. Heckmann and Nicolas Lenoir (Orlans: Paradigme, 2012), pp. 167186 (169).
128 Clari, Conqute, 52, p. 128. The un-named sultan is, of course, Kaykhusraw I (11921196,
12051211), the youngest son of Kilij Arslan II, whom Robert de Clari regards as the rightful
heir (drois oirs) against his brother Sulaymanshah.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 452 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 453

Constantinople, as things were then, and they dared not to leave it.129 This epi-
sode is remarkably similar to that in which Johannitsa requests recognition of
the title of king of his own lands in exchange for becoming a vassal of the cru-
saders against Constantinople, and offering military assistance in the form of
100000 men. Like Kaykhusraw, Johannitsa was rebuffed, as the barons needed
neither his fealty nor his military assistance.130 The episode of Johannitsa
requesting recognition from the crusaders is in turn remarkably similar to
Niketas Choniatess coverage of the same events. According to Choniates,
Johannitsa dispatched an embassy of friendship to the crusaders, who none-
theless repulsed and asked him to address them as a servant addresses his
masters.131 That the crusaders refused Johannitsas offers on grounds that he had
rebelled against his Roman lords suggests that they had chosen to treat him in
the same demeaning way in which the Byzantines had previously treated the
Vlach rulers. Choniatess version of events is therefore to be preferred to Robert
de Claris. The latter simply put a spin on a story he may have learned from
Byzantine informants in Constantinople.132 Choniatess Johannitsa does not
ask for anything, but simply looks for friends or allies. Robert de Clari has him
requesting the recognition of his title of king. This detail had to be added in
order to link the story to that about Johannitsa obtaining a crown and the title
of king from the pope.133 While the barons of the army treated Johannitsa
as a usurper, the pope recognized him as king. The arrogance of the crusaders
would have long-term consequences, as Johannitsa did not forget the indignity
he had suffered and took his revenge on the battlefield at Adrianople (che fu
molt grand deus et molt grans damages).134

129 The Conquest of Constantinople, transl. by McNeal, 79.


130 Clari, Conqute 65, p. 144. The parallel between the two scenes has first been noted by
Kinoshita, Medieval Boundaries, 154155.
131 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 613. See also Genoveva Cankova-Petkova, A propos des
rapports bulgaro-francs au commencement du XIIIe sicle, Bulgarian Historical Review
4.4 (1976): 5161 (52); Pecican, ntre cruciai i ttari, 7577.
132 Boris A. Todorov, The Bulgarians Between Two Romes: The Discourse of Power in Medieval
Bulgaria (Ph.D. diss. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 2007), 202; Mrcule, A
solicitat arul, 32. Robert de Claris mention of the crusaders rejecting Johannitsas offer
of cooperation shows that the crusaders have inherited the Byzantine notion of Peter and
Asen having usurped the imperial power, since their lands rightly belonged to the Empire
(Madgearu, Asnetii, 122). To be sure, Robert de Clari knows that Johannitsas country has
once been une tere qui est du demaine lempereur (Clari, Conqute 64, p. 142).
133 Clari, Conqute 65, p. 144.
134 Clari, Conqute 65, p. 144.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 453 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


454 Curta

But there is more to the parallel between Niketas Choniates and Robert
de Clari than meets the eye. Both attach an epithet to Johannitsas name:
the Mysian in Choniates, the Vlach in Robert de Clari. Robert de Claris
Johannitsa used to be a serjans of the emperor in charge with an imperial
horse farm. As such, he had to come to Constantinople every year. During one
of his visits, however, he is struck in the face by an imperial official (either
a eunuch or an usherer). Steamed up about the offense, he leaves the court
in rage and begins to plot a rebellion against the emperor, gathering on his
side both Vlachs and Cumans.135 This is clearly a variation of the story of Peter
and Asen to be found in Choniates.136 There are at least three points of over-
lap between the two stories.137 First, the hero (Asen for Choniates, Johannitsa
for Robert de Clari) is insulted and struck in the face (with a whip, according
to Robert de Clari, perhaps in reference to Johannitsa being in charge with the
emperors horses). He then leaves the court in rage, and subsequently begins
to organize the rebellion. In other words, the point of the story is to explain the
rebellion of the Vlachs by means of the incident in Kypsella.
How are the remarkable paralles between Robert de Clari and Choniates to
be explained? A direct correlation is of course out of question, for it was impos-
sible for Robert de Clari to have read Choniatess History, as he was in France
by the time Choniates died in Nicaea without finishing his work. Instead, both
authors must have learned about this incident from Constantinople. Robert de
Clari was there between July 1203 and the spring of 1205.138 Choniatess infor-
mation, on the other hand, is based on anecdotes or rumors that circulated
in Constantinople before, but also after the crusaders conquest of the city on
April 8, 1204. It is from such anecdotes and rumors that Robert de Clari learned
about the beginning of the Vlach rebellion, as well as the way in which the
crusaders had rejected Johannitsas offer of military assistance. In his Conquest

135 Clari, Conqute 65, p. 144.


136 Niketas Choniates, Historia, 369; Konstantin Mechev, Osvoboditelnaia borba bol-
garskogo narodo v konce XII-nachale XIII v. (K voprosu o soderzhanii termina vlachi),
Sovetskoe slavianovedenie (1979): no. 2, 3547 (3839).
137 Malingoudis, Die Nachrichten, 8485 with n. 101 notes two other correspondences
between Choniates and Robert de Clari: the demise of Andronicus Comnenus at the
hands of Isaac Angelos (Kyrsac), and the rebellion of Branas and his subsequent defeat
by Conrad of Montferrat.
138 Peter Schreiner, Robert de Clari und Konstantinopel, in Novum millennium. Studies in
Byzantine History and Culture Dedicated to Paul Speck, 19 December 1999, ed. C. Sode and
S. A. Takcs (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), pp. 237256 (338) notes that even the description
of the city is not based on an eyewitness account (i.e., Robert de Claris own experience of
Constantinople), but on written and oral accounts.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 454 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 455

of Constantinople, the former was meant to explain how Vlachia became a


major power, and the latterthe disaster at Adrianople. Unlike Villehardouin,
Robert de Clari explains that disaster as divine retribution for the arrogance of
the barons towards the poor people of the army and for the horrible sins com-
mitted in Constantinople after its conquest.139 Unlike Henri de Valenciennes,
Robert de Clari regards the Vlachs not as enemies of the Church, but as Gods
instruments for punishing sinners. In and by themselves, the Vlachs have no
significance: Robert de Clari mentions them only a few times in his Conquest
of Constantinople. But after being chosen by God to inflict upon the crusad-
ers the punishment they deserved, the Vlachs cannot be ignored any more.140
That is why Claris Johannitsa has none of the negative traits Villehardouin
has attributed to him: there is no word either of trahson or of indiscrimi-
nate massacres of prisoners. That is also why there is no crusade against the
Vlachs. On the contrary, while Henri de Valencienness Slav is eager to marry
Emperor Henry Is daughter, in Robert de Clari it is the emperor, who after
much hesitation (due to the womans allegedly low origin) is convinced by his
barons that it is in his own interest to ask Boril for the hand of his stepdaugh-
ter. Henri de Valencienness Henry gives his daughter a forewarning about her
future husband being somewhat savage. Robert de Claris Boril lives in a sav-
age country and may have barbarian features, but sends his stepdaughter to
Constantinople with a numerous retinue and an impressive dowry.141
How is the dramatic change to be explained, from the haughty attitude of
those who rejected Johannitsa to the rather humiliating position in which
Emperor Henry found himself in relation to Boril? The barons explain it all:
the Vlachs are now the most powerful and feared people in the empire, if
not the world. In relation to Constantinople, the Vlachs have now a posi-
tion symmetrically opposed to that of the Saracens.142 Byzantine politi-
cal refugees can go either to Vlachia or to Konya. When the crusaders close
on Constantinople, both Vlach and Saracen rulers approach them with
requests for help. Both Johannitsa and Kaykhusraw are turned down, but only

139 Clari, Conqute 112, p. 208; Dembowski, Chronique, 99; Kinoshita, Medieval Boundaries, 171.
140 Varvaro, Esperienza e racconto, 1425.
141 Clari, Conqute 116117, pp. 210 and 212. There is comic effect in the scene of Burus on
the point of executing Emperor Henrys enovys before realizing why there were there and
what they wanted.
142 In the thirteenth-century chanson de geste entitled Doon de Mayence (Les anciens potes
de France, ed. F. Guessard, 2 vols. (Paris: F. Vieweg, 1859), 2:345), Bulgaria (Bougerie)
marche a lAmustant et au roi de Blasquie. Amustant (in Middle French, a word derived
from Arabic al-mustal) is the governor of a Muslim country, an emir.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 455 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


456 Curta

Johannitsa gets his revenge. While the Vlachs appear increasingly formidable
before and after Adrianople, Peter of Bracheux asks for a kingdom for himself,
which was in the land of the Saracens toward Konya, if he should conquer it,
and it was given to him, and my lord Pierre went there with all his people, and
he conquered this kingdom right well and was lord of it.143 Given the super-
hero stature of Peter of Bracheux, it is perhaps no accident that the episode of
his meeting with the Vlachs and the Cumans was inserted at a later date into
the text of the Conquest of Constantinople before the account of the allocation
of the immovable wealth of the empire. The episode in fact operates like the
mirror image of Robert de Claris own (original) account of Peters conquest of
the lands next to the sultanate of Konya.
It may also not be an accident that the theme of that episode is the Trojan
legend. During the last quarter of the twelfth century, some learned mem-
bers of the Byzantine elite began to invoke the Roman origin of the Vlachs,
most likely because of the cultural fads of that time, especially the fascina-
tion with the history of Republican and early imperial Rome. However, neither
Choniates nor the chroniclers of the Fourth Crusade made any reference to
the Roman origin of the Vlachs. Their silence is significant, especially when
considered against the existing evidence pointing to the spread of that idea
beyond the limited circles of the educated elites in Constantinople. Most
relevant in this respect is a legal case mentioned in a document from the
chancery of John Apokaukos, Bishop of Naupaktos (11991233). The docu-
ment is dated to 1222 and refers to the complaint of one Symeon Sgouropoulos,
against a man named Avrilionis Constantine. Constantine is accused of hav-
ing raped Symeons youngest daughter, Blasia, and then beaten and seriously
injured Symeon himself. His accomplices in the crime were his people (meth
homogenous laou), for he is described as a colonist of the Romans, whom
people now call Vlachs (Rmain apoikos, onoma Konstantinos, Blachous touto
to genos o kairos nomasen anthropos).144 Despite the sarcastic tone, this is as

143 The Conquest of Constantinople, transl. by McNeal, 125.


144 Nikos A. Bees, Unedierte Schriftstcke aus der Kanzlei des Johannes Apokaukos des
Metropoliten von Naupaktos (in Aetolien), Byzantinisch-neugriechische Jahrbcher
21 (19711974): 55160 (6062); Nsturel, Les Valaques balkaniques, 945 and 99;
Winnifrith, Vlachs, 119; Kosmas Lampropoulos, Ioannes Apokaukos. Symbole sten ereuna
tou Biou kai tou syggraphikou ergou tou (Athens: S. D. Vasilopoulous, 1988), 271; Vasilis
Katsaros, Eideseis gia tous Blachous apo to ergo tou metropolitou Naupaktianou
Ioannou Apokaukou. Zetemata symbioses romaizonton me ellenizontes ste Mikra
Blachia, in Sparagmata Byzantinoslabikes kleronomias.Charisterios tomos ston Omotimo
kathegete Ioanne Chr. Tarnanide, ed. K. G. Nichoritis, E. Evangelou and A. G. Athanasiadis
(Thessaloniki: Kyriakide, 2011), 279305. According to Latsios, Konstruktion der Vlachen

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 456 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 457

an instance of intellectual showing off in the manner of Kinnamos. Moreover,


the parallels to Kinnamos are remarkable. In both cases, there is a specific men-
tion of settlers or colonists. More importantly, the Vlachs, in both cases, are
said to be settlers brought from Italy or the colonists of the Romans, and not
their (respective) descendants. In other words, Vlachs are equated to Romans
in a direct, albeit unexplicit way. The document demonstrates that the idea
of the Roman origin of the Vlachs was still in the air in the early thirteenth
century. Why then is it not mentioned in the chronicles of the Fourth Crusade?
Pope Innocent III may have well thought that mentioning the noble Roman
origin of his people to Johannitsa will warm him up to Roman Catholicism.
He probably learned about the Roman origin of the Vlachs from members
of the Latin colony in Constantinople who were aware of the hot topics of
intellectual and political discussions among the learned elites of the city.145
However, in the political atmosphere created after the crusaders conquest
of Constantinople, the idea that the Vlachs were of Roman origin had a com-
pletely different meaning. In the aftermath of Adrianople, such an idea would
have empowered the enemy, who, in the meantime, had already obtained rec-
ognition, as well as a crown from the pope. Only Robert de Clari mentions the
latter event, although both Villehardouin and Henri de Valenciennes must have
known about it, since they relate events taking place at the end of 1204. Even
Clari brings up the topic only to criticize the arrogance of the barons of the
army, who had rejected Johannitsas request and offer of military assistance.

(see above, note 100), 208, the name Avrilionis is a sarcastic reference to Constantines
people, possibly alluding to Emperor Aurelianus (270275) during whose reign the prov-
ince of Dacia was abandoned. Epirote Vlachs such as Avrilionis appear at the same time
(1220s) in documents of the chancery of the archbishop of Ohrid, Demetrios Chomatenos,
but without any mention of their Roman origins: Gnter Prinzing, Abbot or bishop?
The conflict about the spiritual obedience of the Vlach peasants in the region of Bothrotos
ca.1220: case no. 80 of the legal works of Demetrios Chomatenos reconsidered, in Church
and Society in Late Byzantium, ed. D. G. Angelov (Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute,
Western Michigan University, 2009), 2542. Similarly, there is no mention of such matters
in the charters of Stephen Nemanja for the Hilandar Monastery (11981199) and of his son,
Stephen Prvovenani, for the ia Monastery (1220), the earliest non-narrative sources in
Slavonic to mention the Vlachs (Silviu Dragomir, Vlahii din nordul Peninsulei Balcanice
n Evul Mediu (Bucharest: Editura Academiei RPR, 1959), 1718).
145 One of his informants may have been a certain Pretextatus, who is mentioned in three
letters as living in Constantinople together with his Hungarian wife, Sibilia (Innocent III,
epp. 114, 115, and 140, in Die Register Innocenz III., vol. 5, 226, 227, and 231). Prinzing, Das
Papsttum, 167 n. 105, points out that Pretextatus was in fact the liaison through which
Innocent IIIs letters reached Johannitsa (and vice-versa) in the early years of their
correspondence.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 457 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


458 Curta

Although Clari knew about the relations between Johannitsa and Innocent III,
he is silent about the Roman origin of the Vlachs. Nor do Villehardouin and
Henri de Valenciennes have anything to say in that respect, since their Vlachs
and portraits of Johannitsa and Boril, respectively, look more barbarian than
Robert de Claris.
Furthermore, there may have been an alternative ideological construct at
work, which prevented the three chroniclers of the Fourth Crusade from men-
tioning the idea that the Vlachs were descendants of noble Romans. In the
early thirteenth century, that construct, based as it was on the Trojan legend,
linked the glorious Roman past to the French, and not to the Vlachs.146 To be
sure, the emphasis in such late twelfth-century works as Eneas, long thought
to be an Old French version of Virgils Aeneid, and Benot de Sainte-Maures
Roman de Troie, is less on Rome and more on Troy.147 But Virgils idea that the
Romans were the heirs of Troy through Aeneas was sufficiently established
around 1200 in the Old French literature. At the same time, however, Troy was
linked to medieval France, and Trojans were depicted as the ancestors of the
French, as in the illuminations of one of the earliest surviving manuscripts
of the Roman de Troie.148 Re-inventing the homeland is precisely why the

146 Emmanule Baumgartner, Troie et Constantinople dans quelques textes du XIIe et du


XIIIe sicles: fiction et histoire, in La ville. Histoires et mythes, ed. M.-C. Bancquart (Paris:
Institut de Franais de lUniversit X-Nanterre, 1982), 616 (13).
147 Jessie Crossland, Eneas and the Aeneid, Modern Language Review 29 (1934): no. 3, 282
290; Rossana Petull, Il roman dEneas e lEneide, Filologia medievale e umanistica 102
(1968): 409431. However, the relation between the Aeneid and the Eneas is more com-
plicated than that (Francine Mora, De lEnide lEnas: le traducteur mdival la
recherche dune nouvelle stylistique, Bien dire et bien aprandre 14 (1996): 2140; Vladimir
Agrigoroaei, Histoire des traductions en franais au XIIe sicle (Ph.D. diss. University
of Poitiers, 2011), 262266. What is not at stake in this debate, however, is the fact that
the anonymous French poet knew that the Aeneid was about the origins of Rome. Aim
Petit, Lanachronisme dans les romans antiques du XIIe sicle. Le Roma de Thbes, le Roman
dnas, le Roman de Troie, le Roman dAlexandre (Paris: Honor Champion, 2002), 201,
notes that the French poet lists the kings of Rome in the same order that Vergil had them,
and that to its audience Eneas may sometimes have been a true De viris illustribus Romae.
Penny Eley, The Myth of Trojan Descent and Perceptions of National Identity: The Case
of Eneas and the Roman de Troie, Nottingham Medieval Studies 35 (1991): 2740 (32) goes
a step farther when interpreting the reference to Latin (the language in which Lavinia
wrote her declaration of love to Eneas) as clearly designed to emphasize the fact that
Lavinias Italy is destined to become the cradle of Roman civilization.
148 Elizabeth Morrison, Linking Ancient Troy and Medieval France: Illuminations of an
Early Copy of the Roman de Troie, in Medieval Manuscripts, Their Makers and Users.
A Special Issue of Viator in Honor of Richard and Mary Rouse, ed. H. A. Kelly and C. Baswell

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 458 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 459

episode of Peter of Bracheuxs meeting with the Vlachs and the Cumans was
inserted into Robert de Claris Conquest of Constantinople. Neither Peter nor
the Vlachs make any reference to the Romans. Moreover, while the Vlachs are
aware of the Trojan legend, they do not take the opportunity to claim that they
are the true heirs of Troy, because of being of Roman descent. Nonetheless,
as Theresa Shawcross has shown, Peter de Bracheuxs argument concerning
Trojan ancestry is proffered by way of explanation for the second assault on
Constantinople.149 Given that the Vlachs ask Peter about the reason for which
the crusaders came to their (the Vlachs) country to conquer lands, I would
suggest that the reason for which this episode was inserted into the text of
Claris Conquest of Constantinople may have something to do with the idea that
the Vlachs were of Roman origin. To counter such claims, Peter of Bracheux
invokes the Trojan legend, thus shifting the emphasis from Rome to Troy. That
Romans are not mentioned at all in this episode is because the Trojans are
presented instead as ancestors of the (essentially, French) crusaders.150 The
episode of Peter of Bracheuxs meeting with the Vlachs is therefore an indi-
rect testimony of how widespread and politically powerful was the idea of the
Roman origin of Johannitsa and his Vlachs.
That idea originated in the cultural milieu of Byzantine lettrs in twelfth-
century Constantinople. However, it is conspicuously absent from the work
of Niketas Choniates, which is otherwise the most detailed account of the
Vlachs among the sources examined in this paper. That Choniates avoids any
mention of the Roman origin of the Vlachs may have something to do with
the changing political climate in which he was writing his History. One of the
most important issues defining that climate was the debate over the new defi-
nition of Roman-ness that resulted from the conquest of Constantinople by
crusaders in 1204 and the rise of the Byzantine successor states, particularly
Nicaea (where Choniates went as a refugee from Constantinople). At stake
was more Roman (political) identity than history, but there was no room in
this debate for Vlach claims to Roman ancestry. Moreover, the very fact that
such claims had meanwhile been made (on behalf of the Vlachs) by the pope

(Turnhout: Brepols, 2011), 77102. For a historical survey of the linkage between the Trojan
legend and the French, see Claire Boudreau, Les plus anciennes sources du mythe des
origines troyennes des Franais (VIIeXIIIe sicle), Memini 1 (1997): 73117.
149 Shawcross, Re-inventing the homeland, 128.
150 Robert de Claris interest in the Trojan legend is evident in his mention in chapter 40
of the location of the great Troy, which he places at Bouke dAve, at the entrance
into the straight of St. George. For the linkage between Troy and the (French) crusaders,
see Colette Beaune, Naissance de la nation France (Paris: Gallimard, 1985), 4548.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 459 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


460 Curta

who had endorsed the conquest of Constantinople, and that Johannitsa had
recognized the papal primacy effectively eliminated the idea of the Vlachs
being of Roman origin from the political agenda of Niketas Choniates (and,
one may assume, of many other refugees from Constantinople who shared
his political views). His contemporary, John Apokaukos, had no such qualms.
A former Constantinopolitan lettr like Choniates (although without his deep
knowledge of imperial politics), Apokaukos lived at that time in the rival suc-
cessor state of Epirus, in which there seems to have been no particular con-
cerns with the redefinition of Roman-ness in reaction to the Latin Empire of
Constantinople.
Certain key elements in Choniatess description of the Vlachs also appear
in Robert de Claris Conquest of Constantinople, particularly the ideas that the
Vlach rebellion has been ignited by the (literal) slap in the face of Johannitsa
and that he had been repulsed by the crusaders when he approached them
with offers of military alliance. The latter is remarkably similar to what the
History of Emperor Fredericks Expedition has to say about Peters repeated
overtures to Emperor Frederick Barbarossa. Such parallels suggest that a
number of talking points about the Vlachs were on the minds and presum-
ably in the daily conversations of many people in Constantinople on the eve of
the citys conquest by the crusaders. Choniatess audience in Nicaea may have
well recognized many of them, but such issues were still discussed in the city
after its conquest, or else Robert de Clari could not have learned about them. To
be sure, not all talking points about the Vlachs on which Choniatess account
is based show up in Robert de Claris Conquest of Constantinople, which draws
on several other sources. For example, Clari has no knowledge of Vlachs pos-
sessed by demons, while he must have learned about Johannitsa being killed bt
St. Demetrius from sources in Thessaloniki, not Constantinople.151 Moreover,
there is no sign of Choniatess talking points either in Villehardouins Conquest
of Constantinople, or in Henri de Valencienness History of Emperor Henry of

151 Robert de Clari is the earliest source to mention this miracle of St. Demetrius. The miracle
is also mentioned in the chronicle of Alberic, a Cistercian monk in the abbey of Trois
Fontaines in Champagne (Alberic of Trois Fontaines, Chronica, ed. P. Scheffer-Boichorst,
MGH SS 23:886). Alberic died ca. 1252 and must have finished writing his chronicle
shortly before that. He has St. Demetrius killing Johannitsa, but without any mention of
the weapon by which the Vlach ruler was killed. According to Vasilka Tpkova-Zaimova,
Rligion et lgende dans la littrature hagiographique (Saint Dmtrius et le Tzar bulgare
Kalojan), Bollettino della Badia Greca di Grottaferrata 2 (2005): 221237 (222223), the ear-
liest and most detailed Greek source concerning this miracle first is the oration in honor
of St. Demetrius written by John Staurakios at some point during the second half of the
thirteenth century.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 460 9/1/2016 9:36:49 AM


Constantinople and The Echo Chamber 461

Constantinople, unless one is willing to accept that Johannitsa or Borils treach-


erous character is a variation on, or the interpretatio Latina of the theme of
the faithless and untrustworthy Vlachs, which goes back to Kekaumenos. Nor
are there any Vlachs descending from the mountains in the chronicles of the
Fourth Crusade.
However, that talking point is very effectively used in the description of
the Vlachs inserted in the Sefer Masaot of Benjamin of Tudela. Most likely,
its origin is in the same Constantinopolitan milieu from which Choniates
drew inspiration. Choniates clearly acknowledges the fact that the Vlachs are
fellow Orthodox Christians. One wonders therefore where the author of the
description of the Vlachs in Sefer Masaot may have learned that the Vlachs did
not hold fast to the Christian religion, but the idea certainly resonates with
both the scene of the possessed in Niketas Choniates and Emperor Henrys
claims in Henry de Valencienness History that the Vlachs were enemies of the
Church.152 In other words, some of the issues concerning the Vlachs in various
texts examined in this paper may be simply the result of distortion of talking
points originating in Constantinople.
The amplification and reinforcement of those ideas about the Vlachs was
subject not only to transmission and repetition, but also to considerable altera-
tion. In Constantinople, both before and after the conquest of the city by the
crusaders, things may have looked much like the echo chamber of the mod-
ern media. One can only imagine that some Byzantines who remained in the
city may have found their opinions about the Vlachs echoed back to them in
versions much altered by the interests, worldview, and prejudices of the new
masters. To pinpoint a particular stage in the historical construction of the por-
trait of the Balkan Vlachs is therefore to chase a moving target. The evidence
examined in this paper may, in many senses, be unsatisfactory: the talking
points have been rewritten over the course of more than 150 years. As indica-
tors of the broad outlines of the general perception of the Vlachs, they are,
however, sufficient. Despite considerable gaps in the record, the picture that
emerges is one of an echo chamber in which similar ideas kept recirculating
and where there was no interest in who the Vlachs really were. More often than
not, the mention of them serves some purpose other than the transmission of

152 Victor Spinei, An Oriental Perspective on the Ethnic Realities of the Balkans in the
EleventhTwelfth Centuries: Michael the Syrian, Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 20 (2013):
165238 (194) believes that the information about Vlachs (Balakay) as enemies of the
Empire, which one can find in the Chronicle of Michael the Syrian (ed. J.-B. Chabot, 4 vols.
(Paris: E. Typographeo Reipublicae, 18991910), 3:204), also originated in twelfth-century
Constantinople.

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 461 9/1/2016 9:36:50 AM


462 Curta

information about them, such as to show the decline of the Empire under the
Angelos dynasty or to explain the disaster at Adrianople. Their leaders may at
times appear in the spotlight with genuine demandsto receive a crown like
the kings of old Bulgaria, in Johannitsas case, or to marry an imperial princess,
in the case of Slav. In such cases, the interest soon shifts to matters of greater
importance to othersthe Roman origin of the Vlachs, in Johannitsas case, or
the fact that Slav was, after all, a little savage. Even Emperor Henry hesitates
to ask for the hand of Borils stepdaughter, for like Slav, she is a woman of low
origin from a savage country. But he swallows his pride, takes the advice of his
barons, and sends envoys to Boril. He does so because, after Adrianople, the
Vlachs had become le plus fort gent et le plus doutee de lempire ne de le tere.
When history bursts into the echo chamber, its time to look reality in the eye.

Acknowledgements

In the process of writing this paper, I have incurred many debts. Vladimir
Agrigoroaei and Pter Tth have generously offered clarifications and bib-
liographical references on several key points. Other scholars have lent their
wisdom. I am especially appreciative of Francesco dallAglio, Ivan Biliarski,
Anthony Kaldellis, Alexandru Madgearu, Dan Ioan Murean, and Victor Spinei
for their critical comments on earlier drafts.

AU: PLEASE ADD HEADINGS

medieval encounters 22 (2016) 427462

ME_022_04_2232_Curta.indd 462 9/1/2016 9:36:50 AM

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen