Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Martin Rehm
S-ICT 2008
Wednesday. 19th of November. 2008
Overview
• (Methodological) Framework
• Structure
• Results
Learning Program
e-Learning
Online Remedial
Teaching Model
Rienties, Tempelaar, Waterval,
Rehm, & Gijselaers (2006)
Face-to-Face
Community of Practice Workshop
Lave & Wenger (1991)
Community of Learning
Stacey, Smith & Barty (2004)
• Quizzes
• Final Assessment
- 2006: summative
- 2007: formative Face-to-Face
• “Common identity”
(Hung & Der-Thanq, 2001)
The content of Phase 1 was appropriate 4,75 1,44 5,31 1,38 0,001
Experiences
Phase 1 was well organized. 4,59 1,48 5,18 1,54 0,000
The goals of Phase 1 were clear to me. 5,56 1,11 5,67 0,90 -
The assignments/tasks stimulated me to
study. 5,02 1,40 5,76 1,26 0,032
I will get better results in my career. 4,76 1,39 5,30 1,39 0,014
The amount of required literature was too much. 5,44 1,48 4,61 1,88 0,000
9
Paired-Sample t-test
(PK – FG)
8
7 2006:
no significant difference
6
5
2006
2007:
2007
significant increase
4
(at 0.01 level)
3
1 PK: Pre-Knowledge
PG: Participation Grade
QZ: Quizzes
0 FE: Final Exam
PK PG QZ FE FG FG: Final Grade
Martin Rehm
S-ICT 2008
Wednesday. 19th of November. 2008