Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bridges are required mainly to connect between two inaccessible points and also to provide
efficient traffic flow between those points. The problem arises when the distance between two
inaccessible points is large and then the situation demands either to use small span multiple
bridges or long span truss bridge. In order to stimulate such environment condition, it is
necessary to design and model the long span bridges using truss frames. In this study the steel
truss bridge is modelled and analysed with help of software to find out the structural behaviour
of truss frame.
LITERATURE REVIEW
1. E. Bhargavi and G.V. Rama Rao (2015), discussed about comparative parametric study
of steel bridge trusses by applying external prestressing. The aim of the present
analytical work is to know the effect of Pre-stressing on the member forces, deflections
and total weight of steel of a statically determinate three types of trusses such as Pratt
type(Type A), Warren truss(Type B), Lattice Truss(Type C). Pre-stressing technique
has been adopted to upgrade the performance of the truss. The truss is pre-stressed with
high tensile steel cable and the profile of the cable is straight. The truss is analysed for
member forces and deflections using STAAD PRO Software. This paper concluded that
from the obtained analytical results, it is seen that there is a noticeable improvement in
the performance of the structure. Member forces have been reduced significantly in the
entire truss members and there is a reduction in deflection at the centre and material
requirement after pre-stressing.
2. Liang Xiao (2015), investigated on large span steel truss bridge finite element
simulation to investigate the boundary conditions In this paper, through theoretical
analysis and finite element software simulation, illustrates the principle of three kinds
of boundary selection, And according to the viewpoint of stress nephogram real
simulation presents a recommended boundary conditions which formed at both ends
simply supported constraints. This paper concluded that through the above analysis,
Three gusset plate boundary conditions (the left consolidation, the center for
consolidation, chord simply supported on both ends) simulated maximum Mises stress
both appear in the left vertical webs, and their values were about 234 MPa.
3. Ruly Irawan, Henricus Priyosulistyo (2014) at all, investigated about evaluation of
forces on a steel truss structure using modified resonance frequency. This research
shows that the error of estimation of member forces in the compression and tension
members using modified natural frequency and rotational spring parameter by linear
regression method varies from 0.26% to 1.99% and 0.2% to 2.41% respectively. The
value of rotational spring parameters indicates that the members have semi rigid
behaviour and closer to fixed rather than pinned conditions.
4. Akihiro MANDA and Shunichi NAKAMURA (2010), discussed about progressive
collapse analysis of steel truss bridges. Progressive collapse analysis is carried out for
the three continuous steel truss bridges using large deformation elastic plastic analysis.
It is intended to clarify how the live load intensity and distribution affect structural
safety and ductility for these two truss bridges. Although the collapse process is
different depending on live load distribution and length of the spans, the steel truss
bridge collapses due to plastic buckling or elastic buckling. It is found that ductility of
Model Bridge-B with a span ratio of 1:1.3:1 is larger than that of Model Bridge-A with
a span ration of 1:2:1.
OBJECTIVE
To find the structural behaviour of long span steel truss bridge when the distance
between the two inaccessible point is large and this is done by modelling and analysing
it in the software.
INTRODUCTION
1) TRUSS BRIDGES:
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
A truss bridge is a bridge whose load-bearing superstructure is composed of a truss, a
structure of connected elements usually forming triangular units. The connected
elements (typically straight) may be stressed from tension, compression, or sometimes
both in response to dynamic loads. Truss bridges are one of the oldest types of modern
bridges. The basic types of truss bridges shown in this article have simple designs which
could be easily analysed by 19th- and early 20th-century engineers. A truss bridge is
economical to construct because it uses materials efficiently.
Trusses are also used in multi-storey buildings and walls and horizontal planes of
industrial buildings to resist lateral loads and give lateral stability [Figs. 1(c) and 1(d)].
Trusses are used in long span bridges to carry gravity loads and lateral loads [Fig. 1(e)].
Fan trusses [Fig. 2(d)] are used when the rafter members of the roof trusses have to
be sub-divided into odd number of panels. A combination of fink and fan [Fig. 2(e)]
can also be used to some advantage in some specific situations requiring appropriate
number of panels.
Mansard trusses [Fig. 2(f)] are variation of fink trusses, which have shorter leading
diagonals even in very long span trusses, unlike the fink and fan type trusses.
The economical span lengths of the pitched roof trusses, excluding the Mansard
trusses, range from 6 m to 12 m. The Mansard trusses can be used in the span
ranges of 12 m to 30 m.
The economical span to depth ratio of the parallel chord trusses is in the range of
12 to 24. The total span is subdivided into a number of panels such that the
individual panel lengths are appropriate (6m to 9 m) for the stringer beams,
transferring the carriage way load to the nodes of the trusses and the inclination of
the web members are around 45 degrees. In the case of very deep and very
shallow trusses it may become necessary to use K and diamond patterns for web
members to achieve appropriate inclination of the web members [Figs. 3(d), 3(e)].
iii. Trapezoidal Trusses:
In case of very long span length pitched roof, trusses having trapezoidal
configuration, with depth at the ends are used [Fig. 4(a)]. This configuration
reduces the axial forces in the chord members adjacent to the supports. The
secondary bending effects in these members are also reduced. The trapezoidal
configurations [Fig. 4(b)] having the sloping bottom chord can be economical in
very long span trusses (spans > 30 m), since they tend to reduce the web member
length and the chord members tend to have nearly constant forces over the span
length. It has been found that bottom chord slope equal to nearly half as much as
the rafter slope tends to give close to optimum design.
Force in the top chord member at the construction load, R, is calculated from
the corresponding moment, Mst, and the lever arm between the chord
members.
Size of the member is based on the member strength as governed by lateral
buckling between the lateral supports to the top chord until the concrete
hardens.
A minimum width of 120 mm for the top chord is usually acceptable to
support the decking in a stable manner during erection.
Minimum of 8 mm thickness of the leg of the compression chord is required
to weld the stud through the deck on to the leg.
Vertical leg of the member should be adequate to directly weld the web
members.
Otherwise gusset may be required.
Where Xc= (Ds Dp) Rb/Rc, , Dp = Depth of the profile, Rb Rt, R are the forces in the bottom
chord, top chord of steel truss and the force in concrete slab, respectively. Area of the bottom
chord and the bottom chord member shape may be designed based on this force, Rb,,
2. Check the slab capacity for the compression force at the limit state of collapse.
Considering the yield strength of the member.
The slab capacity is given by
where fck = cube strength of concrete and beff is the effective width of the concrete slab acting
integral with the truss.
3. Design the web member.
The maximum force in the web member is calculated by setting the vertical
component of the member force equal to the maximum shear force in the
truss.
The web member is designed to carry the force considering its yield strength
in tension and buckling strength in compression.
STEEL BRIDGE:
1.0 INTRODUCTION:
The main advantages of structural steel over other construction materials are its strength and
ductility. It has a higher strength to cost ratio in tension and a slightly lower strength to cost
ratio in compression when compared with concrete. The stiffness to weight ratio of steel is
much higher than that of concrete. Thus, structural steel is an efficient and economic material
in bridges. Structural steel has been the natural solution for long span bridges since 1890, when
the Firth of Forth cantilever bridge, the world's major steel bridge at that time was completed.
Steel is indeed suitable for most span ranges, but particularly for longer spans. Howrah Bridge,
also known as Rabindra Setu, is to be looked at as an early classical steel bridge in India. This
cantilever bridge was built in 1943. It is 97 m high and 705 m long. This engineering marvel
is still serving the nation, deriding all the myths that people have about steel.
Figure 12: Typical deck, through and semi-through type truss bridges
(ii) Through Type Bridge The carriageway rests at the bottom level of the main
load carrying members [Fig. 12 (b)]. In the through type plate girder bridge, the
roadway or railway is placed at the level of bottom flanges. In the through type
truss girder bridge, the roadway or railway is placed at the bottom chord level.
The bracing of the top flange or lateral support of the top chord under
compression is also required.
(iii) Semi through Type Bridge - The deck lies in between the top and the bottom
of the main load carrying members. The bracing of the top flange or top chord
under compression is not done and part of the load carrying system project
above the floor level as shown in Fig. 12 (c). The lateral restraint in the system
is obtained usually by the U-frame action of the verticals and cross beam acting
together.
REFERENCES:
1. E. Bhargavi and G.V. Rama Rao. Comparative Parametric Study of Steel Bridge
Trusses by Applying External Prestressing. Department Of Civil Engineering, Andhra
University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. www.ijetmas.com. July 2015.
2. Liang Xiao. Large span steel truss bridge finite element simulation to investigate the
boundary conditions. Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, China. International
Journal of Technical Research and Applications. May-June 2015.
3. Ruly Irawan, Henricus Priyosulistyo, Bambang Suhendro. Evaluation of forces on a
steel truss structure using modified resonance frequency. Department of Civil
Engineering and Environment, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, 55281,
Indonesia. www.sciencedirect.com. 2014
4. Akihiro MANDA and Shunichi NAKAMURA. Progressive Collapse Analysis of Steel
Truss Bridges. Proc. Schl. Eng. Tokai Univ., Ser. E. Sep. 27, 2010