151 No 151

2013 5 CAFLE May 2013

* *

1 2 3

1 3 266071 2 200092

H319 3 A 1001-5795 2013 03-0003-0007

2009

PPT
FTP

Kress et al2001
1
Kress2003 Jewitt Kress2003 Kalantzis et al
2005 2003 2007
2007 1 1
2007 2010 Halliday

OToole1994 Kress van Leeu-
ven1996


Norris
Norris2004

2012-09-10

Kress 2001 means

pull
1 2 pronounced beat
deictic type
Norris
2004 115
2002
Gardner Lambert 1959 1972
Integrative Instru-
mental
Drnyei1994a1994b Gardner Tremb-
lay1994 Oxford1994 Extrinsic Motivation
Brown19901994 Drnyei1990 Tremblay Intrin-
Gardner1995 Deci Ryan 1985 sic Motivation
self-determination theory
Intrinsic Motivation
Extrinsic Motivation van Lier1996 112
1 4


eg
Brown1994 Drnyei1994a


1 3Norris
Norris 20042006 Scollon 1998
Mediated Discourse Analysis

mediated action

CD

mode density




1 5



Its a tree

4


1



2 2

1 09 720

689
08

8
8
339 338 8



SPSS11 0 30

3 1


2
20 20





8 50%


1
2 1

1
3
4

6
78 4
2 5
30


5


1 3
5 4 4
8

1 635 /689 92%

2 619 /689 90%

3 548 /689 85%

4 503 /689 73%

5 477 /689 69%

6 411 /689 60%
7 403 /689 58%
8 355 /689 52%


20

8
3
3

20 2 1 309 /332 93%
2 305 /332 92%

3 283 /332 85%

4 / 280 /332 84%

5 267 /332 80%

20
6 263 /332 79%
8
7 244 /332 73%
8
8 239 /332 72%



8
2
2

1 317 /339 94%
2 285 /339 84%

3 281 /339 83%

4 273 /339 81%

5 237 /339 70%

6 PPT 191 /339 56%

8
7 183 /339 54% 2
57 13468
8 175 /339 52%

3
1
6
1 1 48
2 267 3
6


8 4 5 6 7
4
8 8 N Meam Std Deviation Std Error Mean
1 30 65 800 8 293 7 1 514 2

2 30 67 100 10 176 4 1 857 9

N Meam Std Deviation Std Error Mean

1 30 66 500 8 779 9 1 603 0

2 30 72 033 10 978 0 2 004 3

30

4 5 4 30

5

P Val-
ue 0 05 P 0 05 0 590

3 2 6 72 033

66 500 5 533
3 1
7 0 035

0 05

Levenes Test for t-test for Equality

Equality of Valances of Means

Sig Mean Std Error 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

F Sig T Df
2-tailed Difference Difference Lower Upper

Equal Valances assumed 636 0 429 542 58 0 590 1 300 2 396 8 6 097 8 3 497 8

Equal Valances not assumed 542 55 731 0 590 1 300 2 396 8 6 302 0 3 502 0

Levenes Test for t-test for Equality

Equality of Valances of Means

Sig Mean Std Error 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

F Sig T Df
2-tailed Difference Difference Lower Upper

Equal Valances assumed 1 288 0 261 2 156 58 0 035 5 533 2 566 5 10 670 7 0 396 0

Equal Valances not assumed 2 156 55 327 0 035 5 533 2 566 5 10 676 0 0 390 7

8
4
8
8







Norris

1
1 BrownH D M Ms for language classrooms Another

look at motivationA In J E Alatis Ed Georgetown

University round table on language and linguistics C

WashingtonDC Georgetown University Press1990

2 BrownH D Teaching by Principles An Interactive Ap-

proach to Language PedagogyM New Jersey Prentice

Hall
1994
3 DeciE L RyanR M Intrinsic Motivation and Self-
2 Determination in Human BehaviorM New York Plenum
1985
4 DickinsonL Autonomy and motivation A literature review
3 J System
1995 2

5 DrnyeiZ Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language

learningJ Language Learning 40 45 78
1990

6 DrnyeiZ Motivation and motivating in the foreign language

PPT
classroomJ The Modern Language Journal
1994a 78 3

7 DrnyeiZ Understanding L2 Motivation On with the Chal-
lengeJ Modern Language Journal
1994b
78 515 523
4 8 GardnerR C W E Lambert Attitudes and Motivation
in Second Language Learning M Rowley Newbury
House
1972
5 9 GardnerR C W E Lambert Motivational variables in
second language acquisitionJ Canadian Journal of Psy-
chology
1959 13

10 GardnerR C P F Tremblay On Motivation Meas-

5 urement and conceptual considerationsJ Modern Lan-
guage Journal
1994 78 4

11 HallidayM A K Language as Social Semiotic The So-
cial Interpretation of Language and MeaningM London
Arnold
1978
12 JewittC KressG Multimodal LiteracyM New
York Peterlang
2003

13 KalantzisM CopeB with the Learning by Design Longman

1998
project group Learning by DesignM Melbourne Victo- 23 TremblayP F GardnerR C Expanding the motiva-
2005
rian Schools Innovation Commission tion construct in language learningJ The Modern Lan-
14 KressGJewitC OgbornJ and TsatsarelisC Mul- guage Journal
1995 79 4
timodal Teaching and Learning The Retorics of the Science 24 Van LierL Interaction in the Language Curriculum
ClassroomM London Continuum
2001 AwarenessAutonomy and AuthenticityM London New
15 KressG Van LeeuwenT Reading Images The Gram- York Eddison Wesley Longman
1996
mar of Visual DesignM London Routledge
1996 25 J
16 KressG Literacy in the New Media AgeM London 2007 2
Routledge
2003 26 J
17 NorrisS Analyzing Multimodal Interaction A Methodo-
2007 1
logical FrameworkM London Routledge
2004 27 J
18 NorrisS Multiparty interaction a multimodal perspective 2003 5
on relevanceJ Discourse Studies
2006
8 3 28
19 OHalloranK L eds Multimodal Discourse Analysis J
2002 1
Systemic-Functional PerspectiveC London Continuum 29 J
2004
2008 2
20 OTooleM The Language of Displayed ArtM London 30 J
Leicester University Press
1994
2010 3
21 OxfordR Where are we regarding language learning moti- 31 J
vationJ Modern Language Journal
1994 78 4
2009 1
22 ScollonR Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction A 32 J
Study of News DiscourseM London and New York
2007 5

Correlation between the Teachers Multimodal Discourse and

the StudentsLearning Enthusiasm
LIU Xiu-li1 ZHANG De-lu2 ZHANG Yi-bo3
1 3 School of Foreign LanguagesOcean University of ChinaQingdaoShandong 266071China
2 School of Foreign LanguagesTongji UniversityShanghai 200092China
Abstract The present article sets up a theoretical framework for the selection of the appropriate multimodal
discourse in foreign language teaching classroom to inspire the studentslearning enthusiasm on the basis of the theory of
multimodal discourse analysismotivation theoryNorriss attention level theory and the teachers personality charms
and conception of teaching On the basis of the frameworkwe find that students learning enthusiasm is closely
correlated with the type and form of the teacher s multimodal discourse in the foreign language teaching classroom
through questionnaires and Internet votingand we have also discovered the teachers conceptions of teachingteaching
strategiesmodes of teachingattitudes towards teaching that are best liked by the students On the basis of these new
findingswe have carried out a teaching experiment on the validity of the theoryand confirmed the effectiveness of the
above theoretical framework At lastwe have made several suggestions on how to make a better use of the teaching
conceptionsmeansmethods and modalities in the College English Teaching classroom so as to make College English
teaching students-oriented to simulate their learning enthusiasm and interestand achieve better teaching results
Key words Multimodal Discourse Motivation Attention Level Personality Charm Learning Enthusiasm