Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CX-
u
P 1.p
! .. I ,
i
FURNITURE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
by
Anco L. Prak and
Thomas W. Myers
-.
THIRD EDITION
Printed i n
United States o f America
ii
FOREWORD
L. K. Monteith
Dean of Engineering
North Carolina State University
iii
PREFACE
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE
Several hundred firms spec alize in furniture produced for use in busi-
nesses, schools, churches, l i b r a r i e s and other non-home uses. Obviously
there are a few furniture tems t h a t are likely t o be found in b o t h homes
a n d the other places mentioned. Upholstered furniture and items such as
bookcases are two good examples. Labels identified with these specialized
segments are institutional , metal , office, casual , kitchen and juvenile.
SOME DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
The furniture manufacturing industry has grown from the stage of cabinet-
makers and apprentices in the 1700's t o i t s current position. Approximate
wholesale (factory s a l e s ) volume of the 5000 plus furniture manufacturers
in 1980 was 12.5 billion dollars.
Of the over 5000 firms producing furniture, a b o u t 60 percent employ less
t h a n 20 people and these account f o r a b o u t ten percent of industry sales.
The six largest casegoods manufacturers account for a b o u t 1 2 percent of
annual sales in t h a t segment while in the upholstered furniture segment,
four firms account f o r a similar percentage. The largest single firm
accounts for about two and a half percent ($280 million plus) of the total
industry sales.
Currently, North Carolina, Virginia, California, and Tennessee are the
leading s t a t e s producing wood furniture, and these account f o r a b o u t 55
percent of total shipments. North Carolina, California, Mississippi,
and Tennessee account f o r a b o u t 60 percent of total upholstered furniture
shipments.
NORTH CAROLINA - FURNITURELAND, USA
Within a 200 miles radius of High Point, North Carolina, i s produced approx-
imately one half of the total wood bedroom and wood dining room furniture
and almost a third of the total upholstered furniture. Approximately one
quarter of the furniture sold annually in the country comes from North
Carol i n a .
The Southern Furniture Market Center, located in High Point, i s the show-
place f o r the introduction of new furniture styles and fashions. Starting
in 1921 with the Southern Furniture Exposition Building , there has evolved
the largest concentration of furniture exhibits in buildings and factory
showrooms anywhere in the world. Now the Southern Furniture Market Center
i s a complex of a b o u t two million square f e e t which houses hundreds of
exhibitors. Additional showrooms are concentrated a l o n g the "Furniture
Highway" t h a t carries buyers t h r o u g h other showroom c i t i e s such as Lexington ,
Thomasville, S t a t e s v i l l e , Hickory and Lenoir. Major national markets are
held annually in April and October. About 85 percent of the nation's
r e t a i l furniture purchasing power i s represented a t these shows.
1-3
Percent o f Percent of
Region State Total (100%) Region State Total (100%)
North- Maine __
0.3 North Kent uc ky 1.2
east Vermont 0.2 Central Ohio 5.8
New Hampsh i re 0.2 Indiana 2.6
Massachusetts 2.7 Mic h i g an 4.2
Connecticut 1.6 I1 1 i noi s 5.9
Rhode Island 0.5 Wisconsin 1.8
New York 9.9 Minnesota 1.6
Pennsylvania 5.6 Iowa 1.2
New Jersey 3.9 Missouri -
2.4
Del aware 0.3
Mary1 and 1.9 26.7
Dist. of Columbia 0.8 Mid- Montana 0.2
West Virginia 0.8 west Wyoming 0.1
Vi rgi n i a 2.2 Colorado 1.1
30.9 Utah 0.7
Idaho 0.3
South North Carolina 2.6 Kansas 0.8
South Carol i na 1.2 Nebraska 0.7
Georgia 2.1 South Dakota 0.2
F1 o r i da 3.2 North Dakota 0.3
A1 abama 1.7 4.4
Mississippi 0.7
Tennessee 2.0 South- Arizonia 0.8
Louisiana 1.6 west New Mexico 0.4
Arkansas 0.8 Texas 4.8
15.9 Oklahoma 1.1
-
7.1
West Was h i ng ton 1.6
Oregon 0.9
California 11.9
Nevada 0.3
14.7
Table 1-1 : Distribution o f Furniture Sales by Geographical Area
A t h i r d area that has an impact on furniture demand i s the nature and mag-
nitude of home construction a c t i v i t i e s . The r a t e of construction of single
family homes, apartments and other types o f family dwellings has a signi-
ficant influence on furniture demand. Design trends i n construction i n f l u -
ence demand. For example, a trend toward smaller, more compact homes may
r e s u l t i n a demand f o r scaled-down furniture designs and, i n general, fewer
pieces of furniture.
Furniture i s a "style" and "fashion" industry similar i n nature t o the
clothing industry. Annual introductions of new merchandise i s the r u l e
rather than the exception i n most firms. There are many comonly-referred-
t o design categories. Early American, Contemporary, French, Ita1 ian and
Spanish are a few of the most common design labels. Consumer buying trends
s h i f t from one s t y l e t o another w i t h time. Also there are definite regional
s t y l e preferences. Preferences for color of finish in the different s t y l e
categories vary from year t o year. Preferences for fabric texture, f i n i s h ,
color and other characteristics change from year t o year.
Of the 5000 plus furniture manufacturers i n the United States, no two have
the same product l i n e . The consumer thus has a very large variety o f
products t o consider.
FURNITURE MANUFACTURING AS AN ENTERPRISE
Chapter I 1 will discuss how the typical casegoods and upholstered furniture
manufacturing company i s organized. I n general, each manufacturer i s con-
cerned w i t h producing the product on one hand and selling the product on
the other. This t e x t i s primarily concerned w i t h production aspects o f
the business. Making furniture requires effective planning, directing and
controlling o f a number o f resources or ingredients. These resources are:
Materi a1 s Equipment Faci 1 i t i es Money Peopl e.
A firm's product l i n e i s the concern of both the producing segment and the
sales segment. However, product l i n e decisions are generally the concern
of t o p management and sales leadership. Production interacts, b u t i t s
primary objective i s t o attempt t o profitably produce the products required.
The following discussion will consider the production resources mentioned
and allow previous comments about product l i n e and sales a c t i v i t i e s t o suffice.
Materials
The major raw material used i n making household furniture i s wood (or wood
related products). Lumber, plywood and particleboard are the three p r i n - -
cipal forms in which wood i s used. Dozens of different wood species are
found i n furniture, many having different drying, machining, sanding and ~
GENERAL
There i s an obvious need for compromise between the ideal sales program
and the ideal manufacturing program. The stahdard solution f o r obtain-
ing the best results i s t o place sales and manufacturing side by side
under t o p management. The organization diagram looks l i k e t h i s :
TOP MANAGEMENT
SALES MANUFACTURING
PRODUCTION DEPARTMENTS
The diagrams shown i n Figures 11-1 and 11-2 exhibit the typical production
departments found in a casegoods and upholstery factory, respectively.
Rough End
The rough end cuts the dried lumber boards into s t r i p s o f wood of specific
dimensions. Sometimes these s t r i p s are rectangular pieces that are used
in the finish machine room t o make such parts a s r a i l s or posts. Other
times the rough mill cuts s t r i p s to random width and glues these together
t o form a panel. The final product of the rough mill i s always a rectangular
piece with a specific rough length, rough width and rough thickness.
I LUMBERYARD 8 DRY KILNS~
~
1
I PARTS STORAGE I
I
il?
W
U
I
CABINET ROOM 0
IFINISHING
1
RUBBING AND TRIMMING I SPRING UP , 1
1 t
e
IPACKX WG
I I I I
11-4
Sanding Department
Sometimes a sanding machine i s used t o equalize the thickness of a panel
o r to cut some other dimension. Used this way, sanding is just another
form of machining. Most of the sanding does not f i t into this category.
The main function of sanding i s to prepare the wood surface f o r finishing.
Since i t is easier to sand a part w i t h a machine than to sand an
assembled piece of furniture, the sanding department precedes the cabinet
room.
Quite often the sanding department is integrated i n the finish machine
room.
Parts Storage
In a casegoods factory, this area i s used t o accumulate parts t h a t have
been machined and sanded, ready for assembly. Once a l l parts for a given
piece of furniture a r e ready f o r assembly, they are then released to the
cabinet room and the e n t i r e inventory i s assembled.
Parts storage i n an upholstery factory i s a perpetual inventory of a l l
frame parts. Frame assembly orders a r e generally for small quantities.
These parts a r e pulled from stock and assembled. The woodworking
departments a r e operated t o maintain desired inventories of frame parts.
11-5
The F i n i s h i n g Room
-
Packing Department
Warehouse/Shi p p i ng
In a casegoods operation a warehouse i s necessary t o hold the cartoned
furniture until orders a r e received and/or u n t i l an e n t i r e order can
be f i l l e d . I f a firm has a long product l i n e and the time t o cut
"around the 1 ine" i s 1ong, then finished goods inventory may be large,
requiring a large warehouse. The main features of casegoods warehouses
a r e the material handling equipment, such as conveyors, f o r k l i f t s , squeeze
l i f t s , etc.
The only time one f i n d s a warehouse i n an upholstery firm i s when the
company has a warehouse program
I' .I'A warehouse program i s a sales
strategy where the firm inventories a certain small fraction o f i t s l i n e .
Other goods a r e made on a customer order basis and not inventoried.
S h i p p i n g of finished goods may be part o f the s a l e s department's
responsibilities, b u t i t usually i s part of the plant. Close t i e s
w i t h the sales department a r e necessary.
Sewing Department
The sewing department i s much l i k e a garment factory. However, most of
the time a sewing machine operator w i l l sew only one type o f item a t a time.
Specialty sewing machines a r e used f o r boxing on cushions, q u i l t i n g , and
zippers. Dispatching work t o the various sewing areas i s a sizable
problem and some firms a r e u s i n g conveyors i n this area,
Spring-Up
S p r i n g i n g - u p an upholstery frame provides a base for the subsequent
upholstery steps. T h i s includes springs, webbing, cardboard, and other
materials.
11-7
Upholstering Department
Cost Accounting
Production Control
Purchasing
From an organization point of view, i t i s obvious t h a t purchasing
should be closely tied t o production control. The purchasing agent
has to deal w i t h outsiders who generally t r y t o s e l l more a t higher
prices. I t takes special t a l e n t to deal with suppliers. A great
deal o f money i s involved. Most companies will delegate purchasing
to one of the top employees. I t is not uncommon for the president o f
a company t o take charge of purchasing. Naturally, as f a r as quantities
and delivery dates are concerned, the purchasing department must do
what i s required by production control.
Quali ty Control
I t i s important that the quality o f the furniture i s maintained a t
the desired level. To make furniture as well as we know how is n o t
a good policy. The design, the price range, the customers require
a specific level of quality. I t i s necessary that someone be responsible
f o r seeing t o i t that t h i s level i s maintained. I n most p l a n t s , there i s
someone charged w i t h quality control. The inspectors assigned t o various
production departments report directly t o h i m .
Des i gn
Depending on the merchandizing policy of the company, a number of
furniture designs are necessary each year. Many companies hire outsiders
to do t h i s job one s u i t e a t a time. Some prefer to have a man of t h e i r
own t o do i t . I n each case, the designer s h o u l d be guided by the
sales department t o create a piece of furniture that will s e l l and
guided by the production s t a f f to make something that can be produced w i t h
reasonable cost.
Product Engineering
While design i s responsible f o r the appearance and function of the
furniture, the product engineer i s concerned w i t h how the designer's
concept i s realized. Product engineering includes material selection,
construction d e t a i l s , and communicating t h i s information t o manufacturing.
Maintenance
Machines have to be maintained by lubricating, replacing of bearings,
bolts, and other parts and sharpening of cutting tools. G r i n d i n g saw
blades and knives i s one of the principal a c t i v i t i e s of maintenance.
A l o t of the maintenance can and should be done by outside help.
Rebuilding a worn out planer can best be done a t the factory t h a t made
i t . G r i n d i n g carbide tipped tools require special equipment and many
plants rely on outside firms for this service.
P1 ant Engineering
Under this heading m i g h t come heating, a i r conditioning, plumbing,
wiring and even the watchman's job.
Personnel Department
The personnel department i s responsible f o r recruiting and h i r i n g people
for the plant. In many firms the personnel or i n d u s t r i a l relations
department i s responsible f o r formal t r a i n i n g programs. Social security,
unemployment insurance and many other d e t a i l s have to be taken care of.
Sometimes the payroll is calculated by the personnel department and the
actual checks may be written by the treasurer o r comptroller's office.
The breakdown o f these service departments has to be somewhat arbitrary
and one will hardly find two companies that do i t the same way. Usually
the work is divided among a small group of people according to t h e i r
capabilities. Sometimes one engineer i s i n charge of quality control
as well as the boiler house and methods study and maintenance are thrown
i n w i t h the job.
I n most plants the service functions are carried o u t under the responsibility
o f production personnel. The foreman i n each department may be d o i n g his
own production engineering. Often these men a r e very effective. The
question is whether enough time i s available t o carry o u t t h i s function
effectively .
Now t h a t we have briefly stated the purpose of the various departments,
l e t us s e t u p a diagram showing the relationship between them. In order
for such a diagram t o be complete, i t must show where the chain of coFand
s t a r t s . Obviously the start i s a t the owners of the company. Ownership
may be i n one of several different forms. If a company i s incorporated,
certain rules are l a i d down for the selection o f o f f i c e r s , etc. A typical
diagram f o r a large company i s given i n Figure 11-3.
11-10
1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PRESIDENT
I
VICE PRESIDENT- SALES SECRETARY / TREASURER VICE PRESIDENT- MANUFACTURING
I
I
PLYWOOD
MACHINE ROOM
SANDING
CABINET ROOM
FINISHING
RUB AND PACK
WAREHOUSE/SH I P P I NG
PARTNER # 1 PARTNER # 2
SALES MANUFACTURING
OFFICE PERSONNEL
ADVERTISING PURCHASING
i
f
SALESMEN PLANT SUPERINTENDENT
ENGI NEERI tJC
PRODUCTION CONTROL
HACH INING
ASSEMBLY
FINISHING
SHIPPING
INTRODUCTION
In a l l b u t a few furniture factories lumber i s the most important raw
material. In many types of furniture the cost of lumber exceeds the cost
o f a l l other materials p u t together. Almost invariably, lumber i s the most
bulky material used. I t further has a unique characteristic i n needing t o
be dried.
These factors lead t o a separate department, the lumber yard, which has a s
i t s function:
1. unload
2. grade*
3. sort*
4. double surface*
5. stack
6. hold and a i r dry (and/or forced-air dry)*
7. k i l n dry
8. hold i n dry storage
9. deliver t o the rough end
10. keep inventory records
*Optional
T h i s operation i s usually directed by the yard foreman.
I t i s n o t his responsibility t o buy lumber or t o decide w h a t needs t o be
bought. T h i s i s t r a d i t i o n a l l y a matter o f company policy, e i t h e r directed
by or closely supervised by top management. Even though considerations
l e a d i n g to management decisions regarding lumber are not p a r t of the yard
as such, they will be covered i n this chapter. HoweverS they can be i n -
vestigated more f r u i t f u l l y a f t e r a discussion o f the physical yard operation.
Lumber receiving, storage and drying procedures have a significant e f f e c t
on overall material u t i l i z a t i o n . T h i s i s especially true f o r some species
and thicknesses of lumber. Furniture manufacturers need t o be constantly
aware o f e f f o r t s t o minimize the amount o f deterioration t h a t occurs w i t h
lumber from the time i t i s received until i t enters the rough end.
UNLOADING, GRADING AND STACKING
Lumber i s shipped t o the furniture p l a n t by r a i l o r by truck. To keep the
s h i p p i n g cost as low as possible, the lumber i s dead-hacked. (Sometimes
called dead-piled or bulk-piled; the terms apply t o stacking without a i r
spaces between the boards. )
111-2
1. /c arm
LChain
I
'kiln &ick
3.
The labor savings of mechanized stacking are quite substantial. Table 111-2
gives the direct labor time i n manhours per 1,000 Bft.
How does one determine kiln drying time? Most furniture plants do not
operate their kilns on a time schedule basis. They use a so-called moisture
content schedule such as the one for hard maple given in Table 111-3.
Dry Wet
Bulb Bu7 b
OF OF
t o the time for 20 t o six percent, one obtains an approximate time for either
25 t o s i x percent or 30 t o eight percent. -
111-12
Syc am0re
Hackberry 5.5 + 1.5
- 9.5 -
+ 2.5
S o f t Maple
Water Tupelo
American E l m
Ash
Mahogany 5.5 -
+ 1.5 12.0 -
+ 2.0
Sweet Gum Sapwood
Cherry
Butternut
Mal n u t
Rock E l m + 2.5
Beech 6.5 -
+ 1.5 13.5 -
Hard Maple
Birch
Pecan 9.0 -
+ 3.0 25.0 -
+ 5.0
White Oak
These figures apply t o 4/4 lumber only. In order t o obtain the appropriate
time f o r other thicknesses, it is necessary t o multiply the times given by
a correction factor. The appropriate correction factor is given i n Table 111-6.
5/8 .49
3/4 .65
4/4 1.oo
514 1.40
6/4 1.84
8/4 2.83
10/4 3.95
12/4 5.20
2" squares 2.41
2 1/2" squares 3.36
3" squares 4.42
where 1.08 represents the average thickness of the lumber and .75 the thickness
o f the k i l n stick. The amount o f lumber i n each course i s given by:
Q4/4 = 12 x 8 x 1.0 x .85 = 81.6 Bft.
where e 8 5 is a f a c t o r allowing f o r 15% a i r space between the boards.
ILZ- 14
= 26 x 81.6 = 2120 B f t .
p4/4
and
= 378 x 4.5 = 1701 package days.
KCY4
14
Height: 1 ' f o r track and truck + 4 ' for package + l/3' for battens +
4 ' f o r package + 1 ' for baffles = 10 l / 3 ' f o r two package height.
Length: 4 x 12' f o r 4 packages + 2 ' for clearances and spacing =
50' for four package length.
The 50' length would also accommodate:
16 + 16 + 1 6 '
8 + 10 + 14 t 16'
10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 8'
and many other combinations.
Notice t h a t a 38 foot length for three standard packages plus clearance, would
n o t allow nearly as much f l e x i b i l i t y . When the choice i s between four kilns
of 50 foot length and five kilns of 40 f o o t length, the preference should be
for the 50 foot length. The advantage of four kilns of 50 f e e t over two kilns
of 00 f e e t i s t h a t - i t allows for simultaneous drying of:
loads of different thickness
loads of different i n i t i a l moisture content
loads of different species.
The w i d t h (depth) of a kiln i s influenced by the f a c t t h a t a i r flow i n the
kiln travels i n this direction. Uniformity of drying from front t o back
(package kiln) is affected by the distance the air has t o travel. Entering
a i r picks up moisture and cools as i t travels t h r o u g h the stacks. The greater
the . distance
_ -. t h .a t this a i r has t o travel (entering
. - . . __ t o e x i t ) , the greater the
._
problem. The a b i l i t y t o reverse the a i r flow a l t e r s this concern t o the dis-
tance t o the center of the k i l n . I t is possible t o add booster coils in kilns
using track handling t o o f f s e t this problem. In a package kiln where a fork-
l i f t i s used t o load and unload, a d d i n g booster c o i l s would result in the need
t o be able t o load from front and back.
Consideration of drying uniformity i s also a factor in selecting a k i l n ' s
height. A second important factor for height is the material handling method.
A package k i l n t h a t i s t o be loaded (unloaded) by f o r k l i f t will introduce b o t h
ueight and 1ift-hei g h t capacities as factors.
Once we have planned the kiln drying process to s t a r t o f f a t 20% moisture
content, what are the expected a i r drying times? This will vary according t o :
thickness of the lumber
species
i n i t i a l moisture content
location of the yard
time of year.
Planning can become quite involved as i s i l l u s t r a t e d by the air drying times
given i n Table III-7.
111- 16
I
1
20% 7 9 21 19 15 11
Note t h a t this table applies only t o black gum, only t o 4/4 and only t o one
specific yard i n eastern North Carolina. In principle i t i s possible t o estab-
lish a set of such tables applying t o a l l species and thicknesses of i n t e r e s t
f o r any location. One would have t o study local climate, especially the wind
velocity a t the yard location.
Mith such a set of tables one could s e t up a schedule of delivery dates for the
lumber. One disadvantage would be t h a t these dates would not be evenly d i s -
tributed t h r o u g h o u t t h e year. T h i s would result i n an uneven work load for the un-
loading, grading and stacking crew. For this reason, most plants plan on evenly
spaced deliveries o f lumber, place i t on the yard and use always the driest
lumber available. This will s t a r t off the lumber a t the k i l n a t varying
moisture contents and i n order t o have sufficient capacity, one should plan
f o r the peak load, rather t h a n the average. However, since there i s also a
dry lumber storage area working as a buffer load, the peak capacity of the
dry kilns should be no more than 10% higher than the average.
To calculate k i l n capacity, one should go through the following steps:
1. Find the average time each species and thickness o f lumber will
spend on the yard.
2. From the average yard time, deduce an approximate average moisture
content a t the end of the period of yard exposure. Some values
are given i n Table III-8.
3. From the average entering M.C., estimate the kiln drying time per
species and thickness.
111- 17
I Sweet
Red OakGum Heartwood 22 weeks
26 weeks
Table 111-8: Approximate Average Air Drying Time of 4/4 Lumber for
Conditions Prevailing i n North Carol ina 9
LUMBER INVENTORY
The lumber yard i s a processing department i n the sense t h a t lumber i s being
dried there. The second function o f the yard i s t o hold a lumber inventory.
Another part of t h i s inventory i s in the dry kiln and a t h i r d part i s i n
dry storage. The purpose of this inventory, apart from drying, i s :
1. t o a low scheduling o f furniture production "at the l a s t moment."
When on February 20 the factory's production schedule i s extended
from April 10 t o April 24, the lumber for this period's production
must enter the rough mill i n the f i r s t two weeks of March. This
mean we have very-little time t o get ready. The procurement
cycle i s much longer than this period. I t i s t r u e t h a t i t i s
f l exi bl e, b u t we want:
-7 -_ t"-n t.,.....-
ako a- - .d- "v" -aYn- t a n 0 n f n
- a
.
. "II I...,."....,
n z i...
_..-
p ,r i r P f l i r r t t i a t i.n n t.,..-
h e liimher
" I ... a r.....--
. _...- m ket-
Lumber prices go u p and down very much and most companies l i k e t o take
advantage o f "local" offerings which are often made on an occasional
basis only. The local lumber i s sometimes ungraded and much below
the market i n price.
The lumber inventory has another peculiar feature and that i s t h a t we d o n ' t
know j u s t how many furniture parts we can get out of i t . The lumber yield
can be estimated b u t i t w i l l vary i n practice.
The investment i n lumber inventory depends largely on the company's cash
position, t h e i r perception o f what price changes may be in the offering,
and past habits i n production schedule changes. I f the sales department
decides t o double the next cutting o f the cherry s u i t e , we must have a sufficient
cherry inventory t o allow for i t . Lumber buyers who have been "caught" several
times w i t h insufficient inventory levels t o allow for schedule changes, will
naturally tend t o "protect" themselves i n the future by adding t o the inventory.
I t s h o u l d be pointed o u t t h a t a very generous inventory means the lumber i s o u t
on the yard longer on the average. Degrade may take away whatever we gain on
market price increase.
I t i s necessary t h a t lumber inventory and buying process be placed i n the
hands of a knowledgeable and responsible company o f f i c i a l .
DRY SHED (STORAGE)
The dry shed i s an enclosed holding area between the dry kilns and the rough -
end. A package k i l n i s a batch process t h a t produces a " k i l n l o a d " of lumber
a t a time. The rough end i s a more o r l e s s continuous operation. T h u s , when ~
a kiln i s unloaded, i t will take days f o r the rough end t o consume the lumber
even i f i t s t a r t s soon a f t e r the u n l o a d i n g occurs. -
111-19
The reader i s r e f e r r e d t o :
Wood Handbook (Handbook No. 72 - U.S. Department o f A g r i c u l t u r e )
Dr.y K i l n Operators Manual ( A g r i c u l t u r a l Handbook No. 188)
Textbook o f Wood Technology, Vo. 11, Brown, Panshin and F o r s a i t h ,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Dry K i I n Operators Manual.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
A. Rail Stock
14.06 ft. x 6.5 x 1.16 16.8 x 2.05 x 1.12 16.257 x 1.761 x 1.001
5/4 13.95 ft. x 9.3 x 1.39 17 x 2 x 5/4 16.9 x 2.02 x 1.19 161/4 X 13/4 X 1 16.255 x 1.762 x 1.003
9.91 ft. x 11.8 x 1.36 17.1 x 1.99 x 1.20 16.255 x 1.761 x 1.002 H
<
I
N
12.04 ft. x 6.1 x 2.31 33.4 x 2.02 x 1.92 32.509 x 1.743 x 1.748
8/4 10.14 ft. x 7.8 x 2.19 33/2 x 2 x 8/4 33.7 x 1.98 x 1.88 321/2 x 13/4 x 13/& 32.512 x 1.747 x 1.751
7.85 ft. x 9.l x 2.09 34.2 x 1.99 x 1.93 32.518 x 1.746 x 1.747 I
~ ~~
15.96 ft. x 8.1 x 1.18 23.4 x 18.7 x 0.97 22.010 x 18.243 x 0.74!
4/4 12.19 ft. x 11.3 x 1.02 23 x 183/~x 4/4 23.1 x 18.9 x 0.98 22.012 x 18.241 x 0.74! I
12.05 ft. x 6.2 x 1.11 23.1 x 18.9 x 0.98 22.014 x 18.240 x 0.74:
I
Tab1 e I V - 1 : Distinctions Between Actual and Specified Dimensions
IY- 3
Figure IV-1 exhibits the distinction between r a i l and panel stock. The rough
size blank ( A ) may produce more than one finished s i z e r a i l . However, t h i s would
most commonly result from the rough length being a multiple of the finished ~
length (plus allowance for cut-up). The panel ( B ) may produce only one part,
such as a top of a solid case. As shown i n the figure, a panel can be used ~
The finished dimensions specified for the furniture part decide w h a t the rough
dimensions s h o u l d be and what thickness of lumber should be used t o make i t .
Table IV-1 gives some examples of the finished dimension, the rough dimension
and lumber dimension, both as specified and examples of what may be encountered
i n practice.
I t will be noted t h a t the variation i n the finished dimension produced i s
only a few thousandths of an inch, whereas in the rough dimensions, much larger
variations occur. One of the main features of the rough dimension blank i s
that i t has a f l a t surface and i t will ride a machine such as molder in a
straight line.
The rough lumber contains a good many defects t h a t cannot be tolerated i n the
final product. Some minor defects may be allowed i n hidden parts such as i n
upholstery frames. However, since they are permitted, i n a sense they cease
t o be defects; i n t h i s chapter we shall use the word defect mostly in the
sense of a defect t h a t i s not allowed.
The function of the rough end is twofold: converting dimensions and removing
defects. In almost a l l cases these two functions are carried o u t together.
The reason for combinina the dimensioning and the defecting function can be seen
easily. Suppose one woild do f i r s t one and then the other. One m i g h t take
the rough boards, inspect them and throw away any boards containing a defect.
The defect-free boards can subsequently be converted t o the desired dimensions.
I t i s obvious that this method will give a very poor yield, since almost every
board contains some defects. The other sequence, dimension f i r s t , followed
by defecting, i s more practical. When manufacturing small pieces, such as
brushbacks, this method i s quite good. An automatic conversion system can
be used, cutting up our boards w i t h a minimum of labor, and inspection will
l a t e r pick out any brushback containing defects. (Such an inspection would
probably be carried out by the next operator.) However, i f this system would
be used on parts of larger dimensions, too many parts would contain one or
more defects.
In the furniture industry the dimensional conversion and the defecting are
almost always combined. One of the most d i f f i c u l t problems i n the furniture -
factory i s how t o make the various cuts so as t o get the maximum number o f
usable pieces. That i s , cutting the lumber t o obtain the desired output of
~
II
. . I I
I 1 5
1 9
I
Figure IV-2
Figure IV-2 shows a board t h a t contains four defects t h a t have t o be removed.
With the cut-off saw, the board has been cut i n t o three usable sections and
four sections of waste. The usable sections have been ripped t o give twelve
blanks.
I I
Figure IY-3
Figure IY-3 shows the same board cut i n t o four sections ignoring the defects.
On the rip saw the defects have been removed and the end result i s thirteen
blanks. This is one more than was obtained with the f i r s t method. Having
better success w i t h the l a s t method does not necessarily mean t h a t i t should
be adopted. Take for instance the board shown i n Figure IV-4 and Figure IV-5.
1 5 9
W
v
2 6 0
I1 10 w
W $ ,
3 7 11
jr
12
. 4 8
Figure IY-4
IY-5
Figure IY-5
In this case if the defects are removed on the cut-off saw, 12 blanks are
obtained. If the cut-off saw i s used w i t h o u t regard t o defects and these are
removed on the rip saw, one ends up w i t h only seven blanks.
Comparison of the results w i t h the two boards gives one approximate rule:
I f the defects are running i n the length direction, they can best
be removed on the rip saw. I f the defects run across the board,
they should be removed on the cut-off saw.
Unfortunately i t i s not quite as simple as t h a t . So f a r we have only
considered one s i z e blank, b u t i n practice, one has t o produce many
different sizes of blanks. The long ones give the most trouble. If l o n g
blanks only are cut, a l o t of waste material has t o be thrown out. T h i s
waste contains pieces o f f a i r dimensions, large enough t o produce short
blanks. One must, therefore, combine the cutting of l o n g and short blanks.
Suppose we use our same board again,
Figure IY-6
and we must produce blanks of the following three sizes:
IV-6
c
I B 1
1 C I
Figure IV-7
A serious e f f o r t i n cutting as many blanks as possible out o f the board i s
represented i n Figure IV-8.
Figure IY-8
If we look a t this pattern closely, we will see t h a t i t can only be cut on
a bandsaw.
Figure IY-9
Figure IV-9 shows an arrangement t h a t contains perpendicular lines only b u t
i t still cannot be cut on a cut-off/rlp saw combination.
IV-7
r
c B1 U#I , B"
B2 $
R B7 S
R3 c2 I
Figure IV-10
A s l i g h t rearrangement of the blanks will give the result shown i n Figure IV-10.
These pieces can be cut i f the board i s ripped f i r s t along the lines PQ and RS.
Then the resulting strips are cross cut and the resulting pieces re-ripped t o
give us two blanks A, two blanks C and seven blanks B. Note how we automatically
get mosf o f the short category B.
Reviewing the p o s s i b i l i t i e s , the question may arise: Do we have time t o
consider a l l these alternatives? Is the rough end personnel capable of making
the best choice? I t looks a b i t l i k e we need a geometry professor t o decide
where t o cut the board. In practice we have to rely on snap judgment of the
operators. The layout of the rough end will be set up i n a way that the f i r s t
operation i s e i t h e r the cut-off saw o r the rip saw and one i s unable t o vary
this from board t o board.
ROUGH LUMBER
b
SCRAP e FACER
SCRAP c PLANER
*
_-
scRAP c SALVAGE SAW SOME MEDIUM BLANKS
MOST SHORT BLANKS
~ ~ ~ ~-
I--- I
Figure IV-12
Note that the Figure IV-12 cut-off saw has ignored the short length of
blank B. The board has been cyt i n t o one length A and one length C. (Actual
boards are 8 , 10, 12, 14 o r 1 6 f e e t long and normally more t h a n two lengths
come o u t of one board.) This is a good practice i n many cases. If our pro-
duction goal i s t o cut 500 pieces each of A, B, and C, we have t o cut for a
maximum number A and C. Doing so, we will probably be able t o get as many
as 700 or 800 pieces of B from the off-fall. Only if the lumber were virtually
free of defects, could we expect a shortage of B.
I t becomes a different story i f the production goal i s , for instance, 500 pieces
each of A and C and 2,000 pieces of B. In t h a t case some boards may be cut
according t o Figure IV-4.
Some plants, however, have the tendency t o cut t o o many boards i n this fashion.
The cut-off sawyer t r i e s t o leave as few defects as possible. The result
is that by the time 500 pieces of C have been produced a total of 2,900 pieces
o f B are available instead of the required 2,000. The 900 pieces above the
requirement are stored for future use. B u t when another 2,000 pieces of B are
needed, history repeats itself and instead of cutting 1,100 pieces of B , one
finds t h a t 3,000 have been cut. The superfluous 1,900 pieces are stored. After
operating i n this fashion for some time, enormous quantities of short blanks
tend t o accumulate. These will probably end up i n the boiler room. Now, not
only the lumber is wasted b u t a l l the labor that has gone i n t o this unnecessary
e f f o r t i s wasted also.
Among the defects that need t o be removed, one should certainly count severe
bow o r warp. T h i s defect i s peculiar in the way that i t can be removed by
cutting a board i n short lengths w i t h o u t actually throwing any part away. One
is reasonably free i n the choice of where t o make the cut.
r v-9
Bow
--
IV-10
thickness and the nominal thickness. If 4/4 lumber is used to cut clear parts ~
RIP SAW
Facing Sections
7
L
I
1
ROUGH LUMBER
I
i
I
t
I
JOINT PRESS 81 CURE
I
J
For situations where exposed j o i n t lines are not objectionable, the finger
j o i n t process may offer significant increases i n material u t i l i z a t i o n over
more conventional processes, More important i s the fact that i n many furni-
ture manufacturing firms a considerable portion of the parts produced are
n o t exposed i n the final product. Bedroom and d i n i n g room casegoods manu-
facturers m i g h t j u s t i f y such a separate process t o produce only i n t e r i o r com-
ponents.
In addition t o finger j o i n t i n g , there are a number of other relatively new
concepts being considered for the job o f converting rough lumber i n t o rough
blanks for furniture components. Mini-computers have been combined with rough
end equipment t o make cutting decisions and keep track of material produced.
Devices capable of "sensing" and transmitting the location of defects are a
related concern i n these techno1 ogical advances.
GLUED UP PANELS
For a lumber core, the number two category, the specifications are somewhat
different. The appearance is of no importance. Usually a l o t of attention
i s paid t o the freedom of stresses. In order t o produce a plywood panel with
a lumber core t h a t will not warp, i t i s desirable that the strips which go
i n t o the lumber core are n o t wider than about 2". Small defects such as a
wormhole or a small sound knot may be permitted i n core stock.
The rip sawyer has the task to saw random w i d t h , maximum 2" wide, some taper
being permitted.
For the type of product i n the third category l i s t e d , the requirements a r e
much the same as f o r the vide panels for solid casegoods. The loss i n band-
sawing i s one piece A and one piece B per panel (See Figure IV-18). The total
losses a r e smallest when the panel has a maximum width. This maximum w i d t h is
usually determined by the g l u i n g equipment. Specific w i d t h of the panel i s
given by: W = Wa t N ( W + W s ) .
P
GLUING
Whenever two pieces of wood are glued together a number of steps have t o take
place i n sequence. This sequence i s :
Appl i cation --- Trans f e r --- Wetting --- Cure.
Since application i s almost always on only one side of the assembly, the glue
must be transferred t o the other side. This step must take place when the
glue i s s t i l l in good condition t o flow and t o wet the surface.
Wetting i s essential t o a good glue bond. I t can be looked on as the estab-
l i s h i n g of intimate contact between the glue and the wood surface. I t i s a
time dependent phenomenon. Everyone knows that when one steps o u t in the
rain i n a good quality raincoat, the raindrops will just roll off the surface.
If one stays i n the rain long enough, the raindrops will penetrate the fabric
eventually. Before they do they must wet the surface which, i n most cases,
can be seen from a conspicuous color change. The same s o r t of t h i n g happens
when glue is applied t o wood. I t is n o t sufficient t h a t the glue is adjacent
t o the wood, i t must establish intimate contact t h r o u g h wetting.
Just as the resistance to wetting can be improved by chemical treatment of
the raincoat fabric, the a b i l i t y t o wet wood depends on the chemical character-
i s t i c s of the wood and the glue. Fortunately, (for gluing, t h a t i s ) there i s
a tremendous attraction between water and cellulose. Wetting usually i s no
problem. However, some species, notably birch, have some resistance t o wetting
and we must control the speed of the gluing process t o allow wetting t o take
place before curing.
Curing is the solidification of the l i q u i d glue. I t must s t a r t a f t e r wetting
and it must be completed before the j o i n t i s subjected t o stress. I n many
cases t h i s means that we want virtually complete curing before we take the
assembly out of the press. However, i n g l u i n g u p a solid panel, i t i s suffi-
cient t o have a cured area near both faces of the panel. This glue bond will
then h o l d the assembly together u n t i l the glue i n the center has cured. Once
that has happened, the panel has f u l l strength or a t l e a s t 70 percent of i t .
I t i s necessary to understand t h a t a l l gluing operations involve a c r i t i c a l
time cycle. Sometimes the following terms are used t o describe the process,
the glue and the limitations.
Storage Life i s the time the glue will remain i n good condition when
stored as received.
Pot Life i s the time the glue wil remain i n good condition when mixed
ready t o use.
IV-18
TYPES OF GLUE
This i s n o t the place t o give a complete survey of woodworking glues, b u t
a brief review i s i n order. We can divide glues into the following categories:
1. Natural glues, such as starch, casein and animal
2. Synthetic resin glues which are subdivided into
a. Thermoplastic glues such as PVA
b. Thermosetting glues such as urea formaldehyde, melamine
formaldehyde, phenol formaldehyde, resorcinol formaldehyde.
3. Speciality adhesives
a. Contact adhesive
b. Hot melt adhesive.
In furniture manufacturing we encounter principally urea i n plywood a n d edge
gluing, PVA in edge gluing and assembly, and hot melts in edge banding.
Animal Glue
Animal glue i s made from bones, hoofs and hides. Pellets, which have t o be
soaked i n water and heated t o about 180 F., make the glue. Use of animal
glue has been discontinued largely because of process problems.
P VA
PVA stands f o r polyvinyl acetate b u t the modern PVA glues contain several
additives besides t h i s . I t i s a white emulsion qlue sold ready t o use.
The curing mechanism i s quite simple. The PVA droplets, which are suspended
i n water, will fuse when they come i n contact w i t h one another. The i n t e r -
mediate water film i s removed through absorption by the wood. If accelerated
by preheating the wood, curing can be accomplished in a few minutes. Without
heating, the curing time i s 15 t o 30 minutes.
PVA i s ideal for use w i t h mechanical application devices. These tend t o be-
come clog ed when used w i t h animal glue or urea. PVA i s , therefore, the most
Y
popular g ue today i n the cabinet room. I t s main disadvantage i s price. I t i s
several times more expensive t h a n urea.
IV-19
Urea
Urea, or more exactly, urea formaldehyde i s a thermosetting glue which i s
completely dominant in plywood and particleboard operations. Urea and for-
maldehyde will form a polymer, a very large and very rigid molecule. The re-
action i s relatively slow and the rate can be controlled by the pH and the
temperature.
Urea formaldehyde i s sold as a "prepolymer," t h a t i s to say, polymerization
has progressed t o a certain point and the reaction has been arrested by
making the conditions unfavorable. In the liquid form, which i s perhaps 60
percent urea formaldehyde and 40 percent water, i t will have a storage l i f e
o f several months. In dry powder form, i t may keep as long as two years
provided temperatures are moderate.
To s t a r t u p the polymerization reaction once again we merely have t o add
acid t o lower the pH. Heat i s helpful too b u t by i t s e l f i t s e f f e c t i s limited.
Common procedure i s n o t t o add an acid t o the urea b u t a s a l t which will pro-
duce the acid when heated. Ammonium sulfate i s such a s a l t . Although the
complete reaction mechanism i s more complex, we can represent t h i s as follows:
The liberated s u l f u r i c acid will cause the curing time to be shortened from
six months t o a few seconds. The heating will shorten i t further.
In order t o avoid 'lprecure" (curing before transfer or wetting), i t i s
desirable t o inhibit the reaction t o some extent. This i s done by buffering
the s o l u t i o n with chemical additives. This will cause a delay in the libera-
t i o n of the acid. I t will permit a longer open assembly time. I t will also
increase the pot 1 i f e significantly.
The ammonium s a l t and the additives are commonly referred t o as the catalyst.
Chemically speaking t h i s i s incorrect terminology.
Urea i s a nonreversible glue. Once the glue l i n e has been formed, i t cannot be
liquified again. T h i s makes i t v i r t u a l l y impossible to repair defective glue-
bonds made w i t h urea. Animal glue and PVA are reversible, which means t h a t
w i t h heat and water, the solid glue may be liquified again.
.
t
CHAPTER V
INTRODUCTION
Lumber i s the most important material resource used i n the manufacture
of furniture. The rough end i s a c r i t i c a l manufacturing department i n
terms of how effectively this resource is utilized. Obviously the more
output (usable blanks) t h a t can be produced from a given u n i t of i n p u t
[boards), the greater the utilization of the raw material and the lower
the u n i t cost of the end product. T h i s chapter deals specifically w i t h
lumber u t i l i z a t i o n o r , as i t i s frequently called, lumber yield. I t i s not
a comprehensive treatment of the subject b u t should introduce you t o the
more important aspects involved.
YIELD CALCULATION PROCEDURES
I t is necessary t o use some convenient means t o describe the relation
between the original quantity o f lumber, the quantity of usable material
and the quantity of waste. Industry practice i s t o calculate the board
f e e t i n a l l blanks, multiply these by t h e i r respective quantities and
add them up. T h i s gives a total number of board f e e t f o r the rough end
production. This may be called "Footage of Product.l' The total footage
of product i s determined per cutting order and per species and thickness,
or sometimes on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. The amount of lumber i n
board f e e t t h a t went into the rough end t o produce this quantity i s taken
from the footage figures of each lumber package t h a t comes into the rough
end. T h i s quantity i s called "Footage of Lumber." The name ''gross foot-
age" o r "gross" i s sometimes used also. Footage of lumber minus footage
of product i s waste.
The fol lowing terms a r e used:
C a l c u l a t e the lumber u t i l i z a t i o n .
I t i s obvious that we should not count the parts t h a t are thrown away
as "usable products,'' The factory i s only credited w i t h 100 s e t s o f
parts.
Y-4
3. From a previous cutting some parts are l e f t over. These are added t o
the parts made by the machine room and from the combined t o t a l as many
cases as possible are b u i l t . The parts l e f t over are stored for use
i n a future run. The quantities are given i n the table below
Grade of Lumber C u t
Furniture manufacturers purchase lumber by grade or grade-mix based on the
National Hardwood Lumber Association's grading rules. Typical grades are
First and Seconds (FAS), Number One Common (lC), and Number Two Common (2C).
Common grade mixes purchased are Number One Common and Better (1C & B)
and Mil 1 or Log Run.
Many firms buy the grade mixes. With 1C & B, the purchaser i s buying the
implied mixture permitting i n some instances a certain amount of 2C t o
be included. In such cases the purchaser and supplier agree on a maximum
allowable percentage of lumber below the 1C grade. With the Mill Run mix,
a l l lumber t h a t results from cutting a log i s included. When buying lumber
of mixed grades, the purchaser expects t o receive certain minimum percentages
of the better grades. When buying lumber by grade, the purchaser expects
almost a l l the lumber received t o be of the grade specified or better.
I n order t o evaluate the effect of lumber grade on actual yield, i t i s nec-
essary t o have some reasonably accurate information on the grade or grade
mix of lumber used for a particular cutting or i n a given time period. Most
firms attempt t o verify the grade of lumber received from t h e i r suppliers.
This procedure could be referred t o as "checking" o r "tallying" rather than
grading i n the majority of firms, for skilled lumber graders are i n short
supply. Thus most firms have only approximate records o r data on the grade
of lumber stacked i n each package or bunk. S o r t i n g lumber by grade is not
common. Due t o these procedures, almost a l l firms work w i t h average yield
figures t h a t are established over a period of time for the range o f raw
material used. They do not have yield data or figures based on specific
lumber grades. Thus if a cutting c a l l s for 10,000 net board feet of 4/4
maple and the average yield figure i s 50%, then the estimated gross require-
ment is 20,000 board feet. If the 20,000 board feet has disproportionate
amounts of h i g h or low grade lumber, the actual lumber required t o complete
the j o b may be significantly lower or higher than the estimate based on the
average. Over the long run, the figures will indeed "average out," b u t i n
the short run these procedures may be cause for concern. If the 20,000
board f e e t above contained an unusually large amount of higher grade lumber,
then the yield figures may be very pleasing t o management. However, what
i f rough end performance were poor for this particular cutting and erased
the above normal yield? If this happened, yields would appear satisfactory
to management when i n fact rough end personnel deserve some c r i t i c a l comments
on their efforts.
Determining the grade of lumber received and stacked does not guarantee t h a t
the same grade or grade mix will be delivered t o the rough end. Air and
k i l n drying result i n certain amounts of normal degrade. Occasionally,
unusually h i g h amounts of degrade will occur and substantially affect the
"true" grade of the lumber. This problem may not merit the expense of re-
grading a f t e r drying, b u t does merit management's attention i n viewing the
overall problem of lumber yield control.
v-7
O u t p u t Requirements
There are several sub-parts to consider here. First, the s i z e of the
required rough blanks affects the yield. In general the longer or wider
a part, the poorer the expected yield. I n the case o f an edge glued panel,
w i d t h would not be a factor f o r you are gluing several random w i d t h pieces
together to create the panel w i d t h . Normally solid parts a r e edge glued
when t h e i r w i d t h exceeds 2 l/2 t o 3 inches.
A second concern i s the variety of lengths needed.. If you need several
different s i z e parts, i t i s best t o cut for more than one a t a time. This
was i l l u s t r a t e d e a r l i e r i n Chapter IV. Most manufacturers have a variety
of part needs that includes long, medium and short lengths. A bedroom
furniture manufacturer i s likely to have a distribution o f part sizes where
the majority a r e less t h a n 30 inches i n length. Histogram A i n Figure V-1
exhibits the distribution of parts for a bedroom manufacturer.
Percentage
of
40
30
II n
33
Parts 20
10
Percentage
40 I 30
of 30
Volume 20 20
20 i 16 -
11
~
10
3
-
-
~
By l i n i n g the shadow line up w i t h the rip saw blade, the saw operator can
see accurately where the saw blade will cut through the board. T h i s device
enables the operator t o determine i f a specific w i d t h cut can be made free
of defects. Also when defecting a board, the shadow line helps the operator
position the board for a cut that produces the l e a s t amount of waste.
There are a number of motivational techniques such as incentive plans and
bonus systems that could be adapted for rough end personnel. Consideration
should be given t o any idea or concept t h a t could improve the operator's
desire t o perform a t his best. Yield results can be used as a motivator.
The a b i l i t y t o determine, show, and discuss yield figures w i t h employees
will emphasize the importance of their jobs and make them more anxious t o
improve. Some companies have employed incentive plans based on y i e l d and
production performance.
To effectively manage lumber u t i l i z a t i o n , i t must be measured. Measure-
ments must be of a nature t h a t supervision can identify problem sources.
If an operator can blame poor yield figures on several bad packs of lumber
w i t h o u t supervision being aware of actual lumber quality, then necessary
control i s lacking. Supervision should be able t o not only identify problems
b u t should also be able t o commend individuals when they are deserving.
LUMBER COST
A t r i p l e dresser requires 6.5 board f e e t of 6/4 maple. If the current
selli'ng price of 6/4 maple i s $250 per thousand board feet (MBF) delivered,
what cost should be charged for the dresser? Your f i r s t reply should be t o
question what expected or average yield i s typical for 6/4 ma l e . If 50%
76.5/0.50).
!
's a typical yield figure, then t o get 6.5 Bft. net, we need 3.0 Bft. gross
The price per gross board foot i s $.25 ($250/1000). Thus the cost of the
6/4 lumber for the dresser can be estimated as:
(13.0 Bft.)x($.25/Bft.) = $3025.
negligible and producing them from normal waste i s no problem. The labor
t o produce these blocks is n o t free, b u t the wood is considered free.
The principal objective of a manufacturer should be t o minimize the total
cost of an end product. In general this implies t h a t the lumber cost
should be minimized. T h i s i s true up t o a p o i n t . Efforts t o minimize
material cost can result i n extra labor and overhead costs that exceed the
savings and t h u s produce a higher t o t a l cost i n the end. The traditional
approach is t o support e f f o r t s for increasing lumber yield. Improving
lumber yield obviously decreases the material cost per board f o o t of end
product.
Plywood, plastic, various composition products and other materials have
become substitutes for lumber. Reasons for this are related t o simple
economics i n most instances, although durability, dimensional s t a b i l i t y
and other performance characteristics have been factors.
Over the past several years, a number of efforts have been made t o de-
velop procedures for determining the most economical grade or grade mix
of lumber t o purchase. An important aspect of these e f f o r t s has been
the development of yield data for the various grades of lumber and re-
quired output. T h i s data allows the user t o estimate the expected yield
for a given set of requirements f o r several grades o r grade mixes. Using
the yield data, lumber prices and processing costs, the most economical
grade mix of lumber can be determined.
The impetus for these studies1 was the result of buying trends for hard-
wood 1umber. Furniture manufacturers on the whole consume mostly medium
and h i g h grade lumber. A typical purchasing procedure is t o order 1C
and B, permitting a certain percentage (10-20%) t o be 2C. The demand
for lower grade lumber i s generally below the volume t h a t commonly is
produced by saw mills. Significant oversupply situations m a y develop.
As a r e s u l t of such oversupply, the price for low grade lumber f a l l s
to a level t h a t i s below real value as a raw material t o furniture manu-
facturers. In order t o demonstrate the value of low grade lumber, i t
was necessary t o develop r e a l i s t i c data on obtainable yields and process-
i n g costs.
Based on the yield data developed, the work2 i l l u s t r a t e d that price
d i f f e r e n t i a l s between lumber grades can occur i n a magnitude that i n -
dicates the processing of low grade lumber t o be economical. For example,
consider the following problem:
Smith Furniture Company has a scheduled cutting t h a t c a l l s for
50,000 Bft. (net) of 4/4 oak. Assume current price and estimated
utilization data are as follows:
Y-12
#1c -50
.58 = 86.2 (86.2) ($200) = $17,240
-
#2C .42 = 119.0
50 (119.0) ($120) = $14,300
A significant amount of work has been done already and much more i s y e t to
be done. The potential savings are tremendous and, f o r larger firms, may
j u s t i f y very sizable investments i n development, installation and f a c i l i t i e s .
No Helper
I
Cut I C u t 1 yoard
Inspect Inspect
Cut '
Cut 1 Board
Inspect Inspect
hickness
1 2
Sides
Boards 1
Si de
2
Si des
Another concern related t o lumber grade i s the fact that when a rough end is
designed assuming a given grade mix of lumber, a significant change i n i n p u t -
grade (firx) caii ri?sii:t i n t h e i-OUgh end being e i t h e r Over or under required - --
capacity. For example, assume t h a t a bedroom manufacturer typically cuts #1
VI-3
Comnon and Better lumber and desires t o increase rough end production by,
say, 15 percent. Two methods t h a t could be used t o get this increase would
be t o , one -- work overtime, and, two -- improve the grade mix of lumber so ~~
will take weeks to implement because the lumber must be purchased and dried
before cutting. -~
EDGE GLUING
The production r a t e o f the glue reel i s the capacity of one set of clamps
divided by the time i t takes the crew t o unload and load one s e t of clamps.
From these data, we might select a 6 l/2 foot slue reel. This would allow
us to glue up in one section.
3 short end panels for a utilization of:
22 = 85%
.f8
2 long end panels for a utilization of:
32 82%
78=
2 chest tops for a utilization of:
2, x 28 = 72%
78
1 bed panel for a utilization of:
55
-= 71%
78
The above figures are based on six clamps per section.
If instead we chose a 10 foot glue reel with eight clamps per section, we
would change this to:
4 short end panels for a utilization of:
It might be argued that such a glue reel would have a capacity o f three panels -
of 32 inches long. This would mean that one of them could be clamped with two
clamps only. This practice is not recommended. The upper limit o f what can ~
be clamped safely with two clamps is about 30 inches and in some cases, only
24 inches. Much depends on the stiffness of the outside pieces. If we glue -
Np 814 m;Pi?ogap.yi we m.nght even fl@+ =--- results c1amprng 36 inches w i t h t o p
=-: flivd
clamps since we could select outside pieces 4 inches wide and more. If we ___
glue up 4/4 gum which has been ripped from #2 Common, we do not find many
wide pieces, and we will glue up quite a few panels where the outside pieces
are only 2 inches wide.
VI -5
flying r i p saw does not return i n time t o cut narrow panels. Since the con-
tinuous machine has such advantages over the glue reel, one may well wonder ~
rate of glueline failures t h a t occurs with the reel glued panels. For i n -
stance a plant might f i n d t h a t over a year's time the reel glued panels show
1.1% glueline defects and the panels glued i n a continuous machine, 1.9%.
The higher labor cost of the reel i s like an insurance premium against de-
fective furniture.
From a theoretical p o i n t of view, the use of the reel i s pretty absurd. I t
would seem t o make more sense t o make an e f f o r t t o carefully control the
mechanical and chemical conditions of the continuous gluing method. However,
many highly successful furniture manufacturers have tried t h i s and s t i l l
returned t o the reel operation. The continuous method has three weaknesses
t h a t are inherent t o the system:
1. High, uniform pressure i s d i f f i c u l t t o maintain since the feed
is in the direction of the pressure; the pressure i s in fact
depending on friction.
2. Heating will result i n stresses t h a t may tend t o rupture the
gluebond while i n the machine or when i t leaves the h o t platen
secti on.
3. Urea formaldehyde has relatively poor gap-filling properties.
Unless the stock is pressed together firmly, a weak glue j o i n t
may occur.
When panels are used i n solid tops or seats for Early American chairs, i t
makes sense t o pay a premium for a lower reject percentage. When panels are
used as cores f o r plywood, o r are t o be reripped as r a i l s , or when we consider
drawer sides, the continuous machine i s clearly superior.
However, for veneered panels i n most constructions, the lumber core i s being
rep1 aced w i t h particleboard.
The electronic or high frequency gluing equipment for edge glued lumber
operates on batch principle. Therefore, production rates are s l i g h t l y below
the continuous machine and panels have t o be glued up in f a i r l y large multiples.
One of i t s advantages i s i n the lower floor space requirements. Positive
edge pressure comparable t o t h a t i n a gluereel i s another factor.
PARTICLEBOARD CORES
--
L .
/
I
I-
-
.
-
, /
I ' . I
4
.*
..
I
-
.
I
1
! .
1/28
6
'/e
l/28
face
crossband
lumber core
crossband
back
,-
(
-
-.-c
( ,
I
, ,.
--
#
- /
, I
--
t t
1/28
1/ 1 6
5/e
1/ 1 6
'128
face
crossband
particleboard
crossband
back
(a1 (b 1
>
-
:
/
l/16 h i g h pressure
1aminate
l/i6 crossband
+ 5/e lumber core
--
I I "
# -
I
-
I $
-
4 4:'
" l/16
l/32
crossband
backing sheet
(e 1
'/28 face
c
-..
/---
*
m
-
, '
#
#
---
---- t
'
, \ t
e
I
*
.
-
I
,
1 / 16
l/16
cross band
center
1/16 crossband
li2e back
1
/28 face
- '/i6
'/2
crossband
band sawn 1. core
1/ i 6 crossband
'/28 back
on hand.
V 11-6
VENEER PREPARATION
The manufacturer of the veneer does the drying. Therefore, one never f i n d s a
veneer d r i e r i n a furniture plant. I t i s desirable for the face veneers t o
be shipped and stored a t a moisture content of 10 t o 12%. A t t h i s moisture
content veneer tends t o be l e s s b r i t t l e , and i t can be handled w i t h l e s s break-
age. If the veneer has arrived a t a moisture content of 18 t o 20%, i t should
be allowed to dry a l i t t l e b i t before i t enters the plywood press.
The main a c t i v i t i e s i n veneer preparation are clipping and splicing. There
are two types of equipment for cutting veneer t o sizes.
1. The shear clipper is a machine with a scissors type action that
i s used primarily for cutting green veneers. In some instances,
i t is used for c u t t i n g dry veneers b u t i t has the disadvantage
of cutting only a few sheets a t a time.
VENEER YIELD
This discussion will only consider yields of face veneer. Factories normally
buy cross banding and back veneers cut t o size o r simple multiples of the
sizes required.
Face veneer yields are influenced by the same basic s e t of factors consider-
ed i n the e a r l i e r discussion of lumber. A piece of face veneer, as i t comes
from the f l i t c h , m a y be viewed as merely a very thin board. Chapter V discuss-
es the effect t h a t o u t p u t requirements have on lumber yield. I t points out
three sub-factors under this category; namelys
1. part size
2. variety or distribution of sizes (size mix)
3. volume requirements i n the various sizes (volume mix).
Almost a l l face veneers are produced by splicing two or more smaller pieces
together. T h i s is somewhat similar t o edge gluing lumber b u t it i s different
i n one major respect and t h i s difference has an impact on veneer yield.
Appearance is a c r i t i c a l factor i n almost a l l face veneers. T h i s concern
goes beyond the need for limiting the number of glue lines and have parallel
glue lines. In many instances a face veneer will involve "matching" or
some type of geometric design. For example, a panel may require an appear-
ance like t h a t illustrated e a r l i e r in Figure VII-4.
Anothet more extreme example of this problem i s shown on the table t o p below.
Calculations of veneer yields are basically the same as lumber yields. The
following relationships apply except footage, i n t h i s case, refers t o
square feet, not board feet.
are used; the crew uses wooden sticks t o f l a t t e n down some of the veneers
which have a tendency t o curl up as they enter the press.
top view
the infeed belt reloads the press. Completed panels can be stacked manually
o r automatically. Both the infeed and press belts can be indexed (moved a
l i t t l e a t a time) by the operators t o accomodate loading and stacking. These
tqylar belts have t o be changed periodically.
Hydraulic cylinders
The modern glue spreader, which is used everywhere i n the furniture industry,
is the one shown i n cross section i n Figure VII-13. ~
VII-16
rubber
steel roller
Data
Face Walnut 1/28 24 x 32" i n 6 sections
Crossband (2) : Yellow poplar 1/16 32 x 24" i n 2 sections
Core Particleboard 5/8 32 x 24"
Back Ye1 1ow pop1 a r 1/28 24 x 32" i n 3 sections
Calculation
Face G1 uel ine 1 x 5 x 24 = 120"
Crossband : G1 uel i ne 2 x 1 x 32 = 64"
Back G1 uel i ne 1 x 2 x 24 = 48"
Total veneer glueline per panel = 232 'I
Total veneer glueline per 100 panels =
loo
12
232 = 1933 feet.
Feed r a t e of s p l i c e r - 60 FPM
Estimated efficiency - 66.7%
Actual production =
66.7 x 60 FPM
60 min/hr. x loo = 2400 f t / h r .
Total standard splicing time per 100 panels =
1933 f t * = ,81 hrs,
2400 f t / h r .
Anvil Clipper
The production r a t e o f the anvil clipper depends on the quality of the veneer,
the length and width of the desired product and the number of veneers i n one
book. A good rule of thumb i s t o allow one shear clipper and two anvil c l i p -
pers for every three tapeless splicers.
Glue Spray Station for Veneer Edges
This equipment, which i s only needed when no glue spreading jointers are
used, can be estimated by another rule of thumb, one spray station t o s i x
tape1 ess spl i cers.
Multiple Opening Hot Press
In order t o find o u t what the capacity of a hot press i s , we must f i r s t deter-
mine the glue curing time. What type of glue will be used? The answer i s -
always ( i n furniture operations) urea formaldehyde. By changing the catalyst
and retarder, we may vary the curing time of urea formaldehyde from 10 seconds __
As soon as the veneer package enters the hot press, the bottom veneer i s
heated rapidly. When the caul boards are cooled between pressings, t h i s
heating i s delayed a l i t t l e . B u t always the bottom glueline will be the
c r i t i c a l one. A f a i r rule of thumb i s : If the glue cures i n n minutes
a t the press temperature, the time from inserting the veneer package
(between cauls) t o the time o f closing the press and applying pressure
should not exceed n/3 minutes.
T h i s rule can be applied i n reverse. If we can manage t o load and close
a press i n 1.3 minutes, we may select a glue that will cure i n four minutes.
There i s another limitation and t h a t i s due t o the steam pressure developed
inside the plywood. If too high temperatures are used, the steam pressure
may blow the plywood apart. The specific gravity, moisture content and
amount of glue used will be determining factors. Using standard furniture
species such as gum o r yellow poplar a t 8%M.C., we can often work a t
300F. and cure the glue i n two minutes. However, most multiple opening
hot presses work a t s l i g h t l y lower temperatures, say 250F. and use urea
formaldehyde curing i n about four minutes.
T h i s curing time i s not equal t o the pressing time. We must heat the inner-
most glue line,which takes time. This time depends on distance from the
nearest surface, total thickness of the plywood, density of the species.
Even though the time i s approximately proportional t o the square o f the
thickness, we may compromise on t h i s for thick panels. An i n t e r i o r glue
l i n e i n a thick panel i s n o t of too much concern t o us. Therefore, most
plants use a simple rule. The time for pressing i s given by:
t p = t g + a d
where:
t = pressing time
P
tg = glue curing time
a = r a t e o f heat transfer
d = distance from innermost glue l i n e t o the nearest surface.
If t = 4 minutes, a common value would be: a = 1 2 min./inch.
9
Using these values, i f a panel had a 1/28" face veneer and a 1/2Q" crossband,
then the following press time would r e s u l t .
t = t + a d
P 9
= 4 + 12 (l/28" + 1/20") = 4 + 1 2 (.086)
= 5.0 minutes.
Functions I
1 Glue spreader feeder
2,3 Glue spreader tailer
4.5 Dry veneer handler
6.7 Lay up man
8.9 Unstacker
10 Reserve
Ir
I
I I
COOL I NG
CAULS
MACH I N I NG PARTS
INTRODUCTION
The rough end and the plywood department convert boards and veneers t o
blanks and panels. These rectangular pieces must be converted t o furni-
ture parts by some sequence of machining operations. To distinguish t h i s
type of machining from the rough end a c t i v i t i e s , the term "finish machining"
i s used. The department i s called " F i n i s h Machine Room," b u t we will
general ly use "Machine Room" for short.
The machine room i s a unique department i n many ways. Often more capital
i s t i e d up i n machine room equipment than n a l l other equipment p u t to-
gether. The setting up and maintenance of the machines requires the most
skilled labor found anywhere i n the plant.
B u t most conspicuous about the machine roo,,, is the fact %hat the stock
moves slower than i n any other part of the plant. If we disregard the
lumber drying process for the moment, manufacturing starts a t the lumber
l i f t . In many plants stock takes less than one hour from the lumber l i f t
until i t is ready for the moulder. If the stock is glued u p and reripped,
i t m i g h t take an additional day or so. Plywood panels made w i t h a lumber
core m i g h t take a week b u t t h a t i s about the upper limit. The bulk o f the
blanks and panels are produced and ready f o r the f i n i s h machine operations
i n less than two days.
This i s an enormous contrast to what happens i n the machine room. Some
parts are machined i n a day, some i n a week, b u t quite many spend two t o
four weeks i n the machine room. And this i s not because the operations
take so long. A p o s t f o r a case may require one minute 28 seconds total
machining time and s t i l l spend ten days i n the machine room. I n most
machine rooms there i s a very substantial amount of in-process material
and often a good-sized t r a f f i c jam that goes w i t h i t . No department i n
the plant requires more e f f o r t s t o realize a reasonable amount of control
over the production process.
In order t o obtain an understanding of the function of the machine room,
we will f i r s t discuss the selection of machining equipment. Then we will
take a look a t the sequence of machining operations from two points of
view, the sequence of machines f o r a furniture part and the sequence of
parts for a machine. Next we will discuss some of the paper work methods
that are helpful in obtaining better control over t h e operation.
VIII-2
SELECTION OF EQUIPMENT
An engineer who must s e l e c t a piece of woodworking equipment t o do a
certain job has to consider several aspects. For example, suppose the
question is: What is the most suitable equipment for cutting a t h i n ply-
wood end panel (panel on frame construction) t o s i z e before i t i s glued
t o the frame? Before g i v i n g even a tentative answer, we must f i n d o u t :
1. Do we s t a r t with a single s i z e panel or w i t h a multiple s i z e
panel ?
2. After the panel i s glued onto the frame, i s i t machined again?
3. How many of these panels have t o be cut (per c u t t ng and per
year)?
4. What commercial machines are available t o do this work?
5. For each of the reasonable solutions, what "other work" can
be done on this machine?
6. How much of the "other work" is required?
7. Based on an estimated annual machine load, what i s the machine
cost per 100 panels and f o r each s o l u t i o n ?
8. What i s the labor cost?
T h i s l i s t of questions could be extended for several pages depending on how
much refinement you would want. The main t h i n g that becomes clear i s that
the solution t o our original plywood panel problem depends on the solutions
of many similar problems pertaining t o other parts.
While perhaps i n theory one could f i n d a mathematical solution t o 15
equations w i t h 15 unknowns, i n practice i t i s better t o make a tentative
choice based on experience (of oneself or others) and sound judgment. Once
a l l individual machining problems have been solved i n t h i s way, we should
attempt t o evaluate the " t o t a l s o l u t i o n " I t then will be possible t o f i n d
the optimum solution by the variation method. T h a t i s , we can make " t r i a l "
modifications and evaluate the new total solutions. All modifications lead-
i n g t o improvement are adopted. To go back t o the o r i g i n a l question, o u r
reasoning m i g h t be :
1. We will purchase birch plywood f o r various panel sizes. Consider-
i n g other sizes used and supplier's price l i s t , i t i s decided t o
purchase the end panels i n multiples, three t o a panel.
2. I t i s impractical t o t r y t o glue the frames flush w i t h the ply-
wood. We, therefore, will -. assemble panel and frame and then
machine tne assembiy. [ h i s means that no great accuracy i s
V I 11-3
In a similar way we choose a machine and a method for every operati on.
Next we establish standard times f o r every operat on and ca culate the
machine requirements for the plant. Suppose that we end up w i t h :
As these sawing machines are n o t utilized very much, we now reconsider the
following p o s s i b i l i t i e s :
1. Eliminate the s l a t bed machine and keep one r i p saw and one
variety saw i n the machining room.
2. Keep the s l a t bed machine and the variety saw and eliminate
the rip saw. (This solution has the "built-in" advantage t h a t
i f we're i n a b i n d , we m i g h t be able t o use one of the rough
end rip saws. 1
3. Keep the s l a t bed machine and the rip saw and eliminate the
variety saw.
4. Keep the s l a t bed machine only.
5. Keep the rip saw only.
6. Keep the variety saw only.
7. Keep a l l three sawing machines.
VIII-4
The result of this study might be t h a t we need the variety saw for some
work t h a t just cannot be done anywhere else. Solutions number 2 and 6
appear t o be a t t r a c t i v e alternates t o our original plan. We might evalu-
a t e the three feasible solutions as follows:
-
1
~
Annual Annual
6
Investment $
17,000
3,000
3,400
600
Labor Cost $
~
4,700
6,380
-4
Remarks
May expect
some d i f f i -
culty i n
drawer
Figure VI 11-1
The holes which are bored i n the drawer front must be positioned
w i t h reference t o edges of the front. Obviously the drawer front
must be molded and passed through the double end tenoner before
i t is possible t o do the boring. In the case of the drawer front
we have an option as f a r as the dovetailing i s concerned. This can
e i t h e r go before or a f t e r the boring.
2. Smoothness of Surface. The surface of many furniture parts must
be smooth. T h i s i s not always easy t o accomplish as several
machines tend t o mar the wood. The drawer front, for example,
might be marred i n the dovetailing machine. For that reason, the
sanding of the surface should come a f t e r the dovetailing. The
boring operation mentioned above may tear the surface a b i t ; t h i s
i s not objectionable since t h a t place will be covered by the hard-
w5-n
W U I G .
Uni.iniin\rr
I I U W G V G I , 4n
111
r+ eb-i
Sb8bWIRcJ rirsi.ravr
U U U W G I
Prnnfc
1 1 VI1bJ
cnme
JVlll
cnlinfarc
JfJl 1 1 1 b L . 1 a
minhi
Illlyllu
V I 11-6
Figure V I I I - 2
SEQUENCE OF PARTS
F i g u r e V I 11-3
VIII-7
r
N. C. STATE UNIVERSITY
ROUTE SHEET
ARTICLE NUMBER PART NUMBER TNUMBER
- l PERy ARTICL
E
WANTED 402- 636 402-6536-/08
ARTICLES ARTICLE NAME PART NAME
n//@HTST4N0
- , I ' 1
ROUGH BLANKS MATERIAL ROUGH THICK. I
BFT./R. BLANK R. BLANKS/ARTICL
POPLLqR 4
c
I OPERATION
NUMBER I STATION 1 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION
FACE
PLY
~ ~~
CROSSBANDS BACK
P44AJE
I 3 13 RIP
1 4 1 6 WOULD
I 5 1 8
1 7 1
1 9 1
I l2 I
I l5 I
I 18 I I
I 19 I
20
I t
Figure VIII-4: Route Sheet
VIII-9
PROCESS CHART
t
t r i p 1 e dresser #234 French)
c h e s t on c h e s t #442 I t a l i a n )
bachelor c h e s t #359 ( E a r l y American)
n i g h t t a b l e #266 (French)
INTRODUCTION
The choice of machining equipment for a particular operation depends
on the economics o f the possible alternates. I t i s , therefore, necessary
to o b t a i n cost figures for these alternates, and t h i s means that standard
times are needed. These times are also required f o r the calculation of
machine and d i r e c t labor requirements.
Whereas i t i s a relatively simple matter t o s e t approximate standards
for a rough mill on a ''per board foot" basis and f o r a plywood press
on a ''per square foot" basis, i n the finish machine room there may be 40
different types o f machines, some of them capable of d o i n g eight or ten
different types o f machining Operations. A simple answer that i s uni-
versal ly appl icable simply does not exist. I t i s necessary t o establ ish
standard times for every class o f operations on every machine.
Standard times may be obtained by d i r e c t time study or by the use o f
Some pre-determined times such as MTM. However, i t i s readily apparent
that there i s an enormous amount of work involved i n obtaining the nec-
essary data. A double dresser may contain 150 different machining oper-
ations. To take time studies of a l l of these operations could well be
impossible because the dresser may be produced only three times before
being discontinued. The 150 operations take place i n a short time span
and, say, two time study men could not cover more t h a n 120 in three
cuttings because they cannot study several operations a t one time. In
t h i s example, only p a r t of the standards would have been established by
the time the dresser was discontinued.
Furthermore, the standard times are required before regular production
i s started. When a company produces samples of a new design and contem-
plates showing these items a t a market, a reasonably accurate predicted
manufacturing cost i s required. Therefore, unless one i s willing t o
make decisions based on crude estimates, the standard times are required
before the piece of furniture i s ever produced.
Some method is needed which will allow the compilation of the standard
times based on the drawings and the chosen machining sequence. To use
one of the conventional predetermined time methods i s usually too i n -
Yoived a n d t i m e consuming. Because of t h e h i g h morinlSiji rate of I ur II I -
C**-a'
THE MOULDER
A moulder has feed r a t e s o f 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 75, 100 and 150 FPM. The
s e l e c t i o n of t h e feed speed determines t h e production r a t e . The choice i s
based on t h e species o f t h e lumber, t h e d e s i r e d surface q u a l i t y o f t h e p a r t ,
t h e type of c u t , e t c .
One may ask whether thickness and length have any influence on the r a t e .
Very t h i n stock requires special equipment. All normal furniture stock
f a l l s w i t h i n the rough thickness range of 5/8 t o 8/4, and we can safely
assume t h a t there will be no change i n feed r a t e due t o variations i n
thickness. A moulder will not process stock t h a t i s real short, such
as six inches. Each model has i t s own minimum length of stock t h a t can
be processed. As long a s the stock i s long enough, we may assume t h a t
length has no significant influence on the production r a t e , provided
the operator can keep the hopper f i l l e d .
I t is a simple task t o make up a table of moulder production r a t e s
s t a r t i n g w i t h the four r a t e s i n FPM. Suppose we calculate the production
r a t e f o r a hidden part 1 3 / 4 " wide, 16" long. We normally calculate such
a r a t e per hundred pieces and express the time i n hours.
100 PCS. x 16/12 F t .
Production rate = 95.2 FPM/min. x 60 m i n . / h r . = 0.0234 hrs ./lo0
The same calculation can be made f o r any number of lengths. An easy way
t o obtain a large number of values i s t o calculate the production r a t e
f o r a piece t h a t i s 1" long. Obviously there i s no such piece, b u t i t
simplifies our subsequent calculations. For a wide hidden part 1 " long:
100 PCS. x 1/12 F t . = 0.00146 hrs./lOO
Production rate = 95.2 FPM/min. x 60 m i n . / h r .
We can now multiply this figure w i t h the various lengths we want t o p u t
i n our table. For a piece 16" long:
Production r a t e = 16 x 0.00146 = 0.0234 hrs./100
The end r e s u l t of a s e r i e s of such calculations i s given i n Table IX-1.
The times i n Table IX-1 a r e inclusive of the allowances f o r mishaps i n the
process ; they do not i ncl ude personal a1 lowances.
Set-up times and the proper use of allowances i n process calculations a r e
discussed on page IX-14.
IX-4
6" MOULDER
Figure IX-1
101
F i g u r e IX-2
I f i t takes 14.5 seconds t o band saw p a r t #lo1 and 12.5 seconds t o band
saw p a r t #102, i t seems a s a f e conclusion t h a t we need 13.5 seconds f o r
p a r t #103. But what i f t h e r e i s no such s i m i l a r i t y i n design? Consider
p a r t s #201, #302 and #403 shown i n F i g u r e IX-3.
F i g u r e IX-3
Length
Inches
iiE
Length
Inches
T H E PLANER
The striking difference between the production rate basis for the moulder
and the band saw is t h a t a t the moulder, i t i s the machine t h a t determines
the rate and a t the band saw, the operator controls the r a t e . In some
machines we find both of these situations. When planing wide panels,
the planer feed rate is the limiting factor. When planing narrow s t r i p s
o f wood: the planero w i l l take them f a s t e r than one man can feed them.
Therefore, the operator i s the limiting factor.
IX-9
LENGTH WIDTH
Narrow Wide
1imi t
Long
THE LATHE
In a l l types of equipment covered so f a r i n this chapter, there was a
clear relationship between l e n g t h of the piece and the time needed for
the operation. While this i s a frequently occurring relationship i n
woodworking equipment, i t does not always apply.
For the t u r n i n g lathe, the length of the turning has no influence what-
soever on the production r a t e except when a very long t u r n i n g , such as a
s i x foot bed post,is turned i n two passes w i t h each pass t u r n i n g about
h a l f the length of the product. The time depends on the diameter and
the species of the t u r n i n g and on the d e p t h of cut. The interpretation
of the terms diameter and depth o f cut can be seen i n Figure IX-5.
IX-1 1
Depth of cut
#501
Diameter
#601 Y Diameter
i-
- .
Depth of
cut
0 - .25 .50 .62 .75
.26 - .50 .57 .70 .e5
.51 - .75 .64 .78 .95
.76 - 1.0 .71 .86 1.05
> 1.0 --- 94 1 .15
For other machines, mostly the same principles apply. A modern approach is
t o make a series of time studies on one machine f o r similar operations and
then feed the results plus the dimensions i n t o a computer. The computer i s
programmed t o do a regression analysis and derives the "best f i t " equation;
f o r example, t = 0.014 L2 + 0.039 L - 0.008 W + 0.3 T. Standard times can
be calculated by the same computer. The risk in t h i s method is t h a t the
best f i t equation assumes one continuous function when i n f a c t , a step
function may be more appropriate.
COMPLEXITY AND ACCURACY OF A SET OF STANDARDS
The f o u r examples cited i n t h i s chapter give the impression t h a t the setting
of time standards i s not such a b i g undertaking a f t e r a l l . This i s not so.
First, the preceding examples have been simplified somewhat, mainly t o show
the general principle without getting bogged down i n l o t s of details. For
example, one set of moulder standards which were used industrially contained
i n excess of 15 densely printed pages.
Since ci = 2 Ci x 0.25,
and inasmuch as
c = c1 + c2 + ------- + ClO
Therefore,
C = 0.25 x ~x 0
($2
= 0.25 x C x vl/lO .
-
Similarly i f C i s made up of 150 equal components, the error i n C , E ~ is
, found
t o be ~
= 0.25 x C x v 1 / 1 5 0 . ~
IX-14
SET-UP TIMES
ALLOWANCES
PRODUCTION CONTROL
I NTRODUCTI ON
PURPOSE
The d e s i r e o f p r o d u c t i o n c o n t r o l i s t o :
1. S a t i s f y customer demands as q u i c k l y as p o s s i b l e .
2. Operate t h e f a c t o r y a t t h e lowest p o s s i b l e c o s t ; i n o t h e r
words, produce as much as p o s s i b l e p e r man hour.
3. Perform these f u n c t i o n s a t t h e lowest p o s s i b l e investment
i n inventories.
The f u n c t i o n o f p r o d u c t i o n c o n t r o l i s t o devise a p l a n t h a t i s a s u i t a b l e
compromise between t h e t h r e e d e s i r e s and then make t h e f a c t o r y conform t o
t h a t plan.
*
Please note that cutting cycle and cutting size are related by ....
Cutting size = Rate of Production = Rate of Sales.
C u t t i n g cycle
x-4
Sal es F o r e c a s t i n g
To d e f i n e p r o d u c t i o n planning, i t i s e a s i e s t t o begin by e x p l a i n i n g p r o d u c t i o n
scheduling. I f i t takes s i x weeks from t h e c u t - o f f saw t o t h e packing depart-
ment, then we c l e a r l y need a f i r m p r o d u c t i o n schedule o f s i x weeks i n l e n g t h .
The head o f t h a t schedule i s i n t h e f i n i s h i n g room w h i l e t h e t a i l i s j u s t
about t o e n t e r t h e rough m i l l , As soon as a d a y ' s work has been f i n i s h e d ,
another d a y ' s work must be added. ( I t i s more conventional t o add a week
a t a time.) Such a schedule d o e s n ' t do much good f o r t h e k i l n operator.
He needs t o know when we w i l l c u t t h e c h e r r y s u i t e so as t o g e t ready f o r i t .
Likewise, t h e purchasing agent may have t o cope w i t h d e l i v e r y times o f e i g h t
t o 12 weeks on c e r t a i n items.
*
Example:
S i z e o f c u t t i n g 11 decided Week 20
C u t t i n g 11 produced Week 26 ( 6 weeks a f t e r o r d e r r e l e a s e ) -
C u t t i n g 11 ready f o r shipment Week 27 ( a l l 1 week f o r scheduling and
1oading t r u c k s ) ~
Therefore, the schedule must be longer than the six weeks mentioned before.
A practical schedule m i g h t be six weeks firm plus three weeks relatively
firm plus three weeks tentative. (Many plants work on the basis of one month
i n each o f these categories. )
Clearly t h i s will be f i n e f o r the factory where t h i n g s stay more or l e s s the
same. B u t what about change from mostly poplar and gum to mostly oak? Do
we need another dry k i l n ? When do we plan t o b u i l d the new dimension plant,
o r when do we purchase an automatic chair seat boring machine? To make
i n t e l l i g e n t decisions, we must have a p l a n t h a t extends over a period o f years.
If the heavy use of oak i s temporary, we are better off to buy i t kiln-dried.
A factory needs t o p l a n ahead f o r one t o three years for these kinds of
decisions. Then we make u p our schedule w i t h i n the context of the plan.
There i s n o t h i n g wrong w i t h revising the p l a n frequently, b u t i t i s wrong
not t o have one.
The production schedule, as indicated above, i s a dynamic a f f a i r ; i t grows
a t the t a i l end a s i t i s finished and cut off a t the head. While the overall
plant production schedule will s t a t e the date on which something i s t o be
ready, the s t a r t i n g date i s different by department. I f we work i n production
days ( w i t h an annual calendar of 246 days), the ready date may be x. Then
the f i n i s h i n g date may be x - 1 and the clamp date x - 3. There are many
plants who oversimplify by stating that the dates for sanding, machining,
plywood, e t c . , are a l l x minus a fixed number. I t i s better t o assume
different figures part-by-part a s some are much more complex than others.
The mathematics of the whole t h i n g can be based on two days per operation or
some standard time figure for each machine center. These time standards will
include not only the operation time b u t also the queue time (which i n the
machine room i s f a r greater than the operation time).
An example o f a production schedule and an example of a rough mill schedule
are given a t the end o f t h i s chapter. (Figures X-2 and X-3)
The order i n which the rough end schedule l i s t s the various jobs i s n o t
necessarily the same as the order i n which the furniture i s assembled. The
rough end objective i s n o t only t o get the job done, b u t t o do i t a t the
l e a s t cost. T h i s means r u n n i n g a t a l l times a mixture o f dimensions t h a t
will give close t o optimum yield. This means i n turn t h a t 5/4 cherry require-
ments f o r several cases must be processed together. General practice i s t o
give the rough mill shop tickets f o r a b o u t a week o f work (sometimes two weeks)
to enable t h a t department t o make yield-effective combinations.
Production Expediting
Making a schedule and making the plant adhere to i t a r e two different things.
I t doesn't happen by i t s e l f . What must be done to accomplish the following
of the schedule? As stated above, the assembly and f i n i s h i n g process are
conveyorized and relatively easy t o control. I t i s the machine room t h a t i s
the bottleneck. Seventy-five t o ninety percent of a l l expediting i s done there.
X-6
floor and 1 2 machines, one supervisor can handle the whole t h i n g . B u t when
there are 250 jobs and 75 machines, i t i s unrealistic t o expect t h a t the fore- ~
1. First i n -- f i r s t o u t
2. Last i n -- first out
3. Easiest j o b f i r s t
4. Hardest j o b f i r s t
5. Job w i t h the most subsequent operations f i r s t
6. Job nearest the machine f i r s t .
Of these, only numbers 1 and 5 appear rational b u t under certain circumstances
e i t h e r one of these may prove t o be very bad. From his viewpoint, the bandsaw
operator cannot really know which job i s most urgent. The foreman can figure
i t o u t , b u t i t i s advisable t o have some system that shows the relative priority
levels.
Management Tool s f o r Expediting
The simpliest tool t o use i s route sheets of different colors. Blue must be
finished before one may start on yellow and so on. If the colors are about
a week apart, there will be no more t h a n three o r four i n the machine room
and most work stations would be limited t o two. I t i s one o f the cheapest
expediting systems imaginable. However, i f a t i c k e t i s l o s t o r p u t beneath
the stock, i t tends t o stagnate t h a t particular load. In a large machine room,
i t i s desirable to have a more "centralizedt' expediting system. A popular form
i s the check sheet such as the one i l l u s t r a t e d i n Figure X-4. T h i s simple sheet,
one for each item of furniture, i s located i n the foreman's office on a clipboard.
For the parts that are completed, the quantity i s entered on the sheet. T h i s
forces the foreman to stay on top of overruns and shortages. I t also allows
h i m t o take the check sheet f o r an item to be assembled i n four o r five days
and s t a r t looking for i t . Two days before clamp date he has to have a pretty
good handle on the status of the items not yet completed. Compared to the
color coded route sheets, the check sheet gives supervision a l l the necessary
information i n one place. On the other hand, the machine operator has t o be
told w h a t t o do next.
Another system i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n Figure X-5. This i s page 3 of a report of
about 40 pages. The machine room p a r t i s pages 3 through 34. So Figure X - 5 -
shows only 3%o f the total information. All parts f o r a l l pieces o f furniture ______
are l i s t e d i n order o f the date that they should leave the department. I t can
be seen i n t h i s example t h a t 11 p a r t s are l a t e . The system very neatly points
out the most c r i t i c a l area t o the foreman. The clamp date column entry gives -
h i m further perspective. He can see t h a t "the s a n d i n g room i s supposed t o get
five days and i f he gets i t o u t today, they will s t i l l have two days t o catch up."
x-7
days l e f t u n t i l clamp d a t e .
priority rate = number o f operations l e f t t o do
Most upholstery firms and a very few casegoods manufacturers produce parts in
large quantities and assemble a few pieces a t a time. This means that the
inventory i s more compact t h a n i t i s a f t e r assembly o f those same parts. Yet,
when an order i s received, the item can be b u i l t in a short time. The dis-
advantages are:
1 . Many more s e t ups in assembly
2. Need f o r re-sanding o f exposed parts.
A compromise between the two basic methods i s t o machine parts i n l o t s corre-
sponding t o 500 t o 2000 cases and assemble and finish in l o t s of 100 t o 200.
The f u z z problem can be overcome by doing the finish sanding j u s t before
assembly (therefore in the smaller l o t s ) .
B E D P L A N T
Cutting #17
ASSEMBLY
IN TRODU CT I ON
Assembling i n a furniture factory i s done i n the assembly department, often
called a cabinet room. The term "cabinet room" i s sometimes even used in
a chair factory where there are no cabinets. Ordinarily the cabinet room
has four major functions:
1. Assembly. P u t t i n g parts together t o make the final piece of
furniture.
2. F i t t i n g . F i t t i n g or casefitting i s the act of adjusting the
dimensions or locations of parts t o make the drawer f i t the
opening w i t h a uniform clearance around i t , t o make a pair
of doors match up where they meet and similar a c t i v i t i e s .
I t involves machining operations such as reducing the height
o f a drawer f r o n t by edgesanding and adjusting stops and
h i nges.
3. Cleaning. All exposed surfaces which are t o be finished
should be smooth and free from defects t h a t a f f e c t the
f i n i s h . Examples of such defects are raised grain, dents,
glue spots and cross sand scratches.
4. Inspection. T h i s i s t o make sure t h a t the piece of furniture
i s ready t o finish.
Assembly
Most o f this chapter discusses p u t t i n g the parts together.
Fitting
1. Cold press
2. Assembly j i g w i t h toggle clamps
3. Flat clamp w i t h or w i t h o u t h i g h frequency electrodes
4. Drawer clamp
5. Case clamp
Cold Press
One application o f the cold press was described i n Chapter VII, that being
laminating of plastic covered panels. The other main use of the cold press
i s i n the assembly of end panels and tops for panel-on-frame construction.
Assembled frames are run through a glue spreader and stacked alternately -
w i t h plywood panels prior t o pressing. As i t takes a long time and many
products t o build u p a single stack, cold presses are normally divided i n t o ~
Steel
with Clamping
Units
Frame
Figure XI-3: Adjustable Assembly Jig
XI-8
F l a t Clamp
( w i t h or w i t h o u t h i g h frequency electrodes)
The f l a t clamp i s probably the most widely used pressure device for clamp-
i n g sub-assemblies. I t operates i n a two-dimensional plane and i s designed
t o clamp a l l types of rectangular framesI cabinet doors and bed panels.
Flat clamps come i n one or two-way clamping models and are available with
manual or power set-up mechanisms. Figure XI-4 i s a two-way clamping machine.
Case Clamp
The case clamp is the work horse o f most casegoods assembly departments as
it is used t o clamp all types o f cases. Essentially, a case clamp consists
o f two jaws, one stationary and the other powered, and a heavy frame. I t i s
XI-12
End panels
End Panel f
Clamp I-*
-----I +------------I Put g l u e i n
mortises
3 ---- -- --i
Rai 1s
Dust bottoms Insert r a i l s
Rai 1s - - - - - - - - - -l___
-II DustClamp
Frame 1
I n s e r t d u s t panels
Dust bottoms -- - --
'-------___I
TOP
1
1
1
I
1
1
:
1
1
t
1
1
* N a i l tenons
I n v e r t case
Screw on t o p
' I
1 1 .
I I
I t A t t a c h base
Base parts- I Base Clamp -b Glue and screw
' I
' I
I I
I
Attach drawer
Drawer guide .) I 1 --_---
guide, one end
I
I
I n s e r t drawer
Drawer p a r t s A d j u s t guide
FITTING A d j u s t drawer/openi ng
I
I Apply stops
I '
I
I
I
I Clean up
5
1
I Break corners
Patch
INSPECTION Inspect
Back -i A t t a c h back
Staple
--------- I n d i c a t e s a1 t e r n a t i v e process
Base Assembly
Base assemblies are usually p u t together w i t h glue, staples and glue blocks.
In some cases, they are assembled w i t h screws or clamp nails. Regardless
of how a base is sub-assembled, it i s almost always attached t o a case w i t h
glue and/or screws. Bases can be sub-assembled i n advance just like many
other partsS b u t they are assembled t o the case on the case line w i t h the
case upside down.
BALANCING WORK LOADS
One of the biggest headaches i n the cabinet room i s the problem of balancing
work loads. I t i s extremely d i f f i c u l t to coordinate sub-assembly operations
and have them keep pace w i t h the main line. The problem i s further aggra-
vated by a moving conveyor. If pull-off stations are used, the conveyor
transports the piece b u t does n o t pace the work.
N i t h respect t o balancing sub-assembly operations w i t h the output of the
main line, i t was the experience of one plant i n Virginia making bedroom
and d i n i n g room furniture t h a t a t times they had too many drawers and a t
other times, no drawers a t a l l . After some study, the management concluded
XI-1 7
one process will be given f o r each piece, the reader should be careful
n o t t o assume i t i s the recommended procedure as many good alternative
methods are being used throughout the industry. In some cases, s i g n i -
ficant variations i n assembly operations will be noted.
Five Drawer Chest
Figure XI-8 gives a sequence of operations for casegoods assembly. I t
is f a i r l y general and f a i l s t o adequately describe some of the more specific
procedures.
In a cabinet room, stock can be handled by r o l l e r conveyor, shop truck,
p a l l e t , o r other type o f materials handling device. The important t h i n g
i s t h a t the stock be delivered t o the proper work station in the r i g h t
quantities a t the r i g h t time. The operator himself usually positions the
stock a t his work station t o make i t more easily accessible. Materials
handling along the case line i s often done by conveyor w i t h b o t h s l a t
bed and b e l t types being used. Some plants use a raised deck made out o f
wood and faced with a metal s l i d e as a s o r t of conveyor. The deck places
the furniture a t a good working level; however, skids must almost always
be used, and there i s greater possibility of damage i n assembly than
moving conveyor.
The f i r s t operation generally performed i s t h a t o f applying glue t o the
mortises i n the end panels. Here the operator uses either a glue pot
and brush, a glue bottle or a glue g u n t o p u t glue in the mortises, a f t e r
which he passes the panels on to the knock-up area. Dust frames are usually
sub-assembled and fed into the knock-up area from a dust frame clamp.
Figure XI-10 shows the mortise gluing operation on end panels. The
purpose of the knock-up operation i s t o assemble the d u s t frames, end
panels and r a i l s into such a form that the case can be moved t o the case
clamp and assembled more completely. Case knock-up consists o f positioning
and d r i v i n g the d u s t frames i n t o the mortises in one end panel, then d r i v -
i n g the other end panel into position, a f t e r which the knocked-up carcass
i s ready f o r the case clamp. Many knock-up operations require two operators
who use rubber mallets together w i t h brute strength t o position and drive
the d u s t frames into the end panels.
When the carcass i s received from the knock-up area, one operator positions
i t i n the case clamp a f t e r the other operator has removed the previous case
from the clamp. Both operators position the remaining r a i l s in the carcass,
then the case i s clamped. While the clamp i s closed, a l l r a i l s are nailed,
corner blocks are applied and drawer guides are positioned. After every-
t h i n g i s completed i n the clamp, the case i s released and placed upside
down on a moving case l i n e .
XI-1 9
- -- -- '
Spindle Bed
1. Sub-assembly, s p i n d l e s and r a i l s
2. Knock-up
3. Bed clamp
4. Cleanup and minor r e p a i r
5. Inspection
XI-21
Materials handling for f l a t items such as beds and mirror frames can be
done by f l a t bed, wheeled shop trucks w i t h individual racks. This i s
because pieces such as beds and mirror frames are essentially two dimen-
sional and more easily handled i n batches than three dimensional cases.
The spindles and r a i l s are sub-assembled t o make up the principal component
of the headboard. T h i s i s sometimes done i n a special j i g t o insure proper
spacing between the t o p and bottom r a i l s . Figure XI-11 shows a typical
spindle and r a i l sub-assembly.
The assembled head and footboards are then sanded and cleaned up and
minor repairs are made. Following cleanup, they are inspected and sent
t o the finishing room.
Dining Room Chair
Most chair j o i n t s are dowe! j o i n t s . I t i s possible t o assemble t w o p a r t s
w i t h dowel j o i n t s by having the parts and the dowels a t a work station
and making the assembly. B u t experience shows t h a t much time i s saved by
s p l i t t i n g the job into two operations. In the f i r s t operation, dowels
XI-22
are glued and inserted into holes i n the end of one of the mating parts.
T h i s i s called pre-pinning. I t i s usually done w i t h a dowel driver, a
machine which applies the glue and drives the dowels a t a rate o f up t o
twenty r a i l s a minute. Dowels are dumped loose into a hopper on the machine
and there i s never a need t o handle one dowel a t a time. Dowel drivers are
normally found i n the machine room. This allows pre-pinning before sanding.
Any dents or glue spots t h a t m i g h t occur in pre-pinning can be removed with-
out problems that way.
The pre-pinned r a i l s go t o the sub-assembly or final assembly op ration.
Parts like front posts have no dowel holes i n the end. They are not pre-
pinned,but the r a i l s t h a t join t o the front posts are pre-pinned in the ends.
The assembly o f d i n i n g room chatrs involves two main sub-assembl es and a
final assembly operation. Most chair manufacturers sub-assemble the backs
and fronts of t h e i r chairs because they often require additional machining
operations a f t e r assembly. The sub-acsembled backs and fronts a r e brought
together w i t h side r a i l s , stretchers and arms in a one-way clamp for final
assembly.
The back sub-assembly consists of the two back posts, t o p and bottom r a i l s
and whatever type o f s p l a t , spindles or decorative pieces go in the back.
Backs are almost always clamped and very often with a stray-field high
frequency clamp. Mechanical fasteners are often used when high frequency
i s not available; however, chair backs are exposed and great care must be
exercised when using nails or staples. The front sub-assembly i s made up
o f the front r a i l and two legs. I t i s generally clamped and nailed. F r o n t
sub-assembl ies sometimes undergo further machining operations a f t e r clamp-
i n g . For example, router grooves i n French Provincial chair legs are
machined a f t e r assembly t o make sure they line up with the groove i n the
front r a i l . Chair arms are a l s o sub-assembled,usually i n a special j i g
t o produce the proper angle i n the j o i n t between the stump and the arm.
The various sub-assemblies are s e t aside and allowed t o cure before final
assembly .
In the final assembly, side r a i l s and stretchers are clamped t o the front
and back sub-assemblies. Arms a r e also p u t on in the clamp; however, work
loads can sometimes be balanced better by applying the arms after the clamp.
Upholstery Frames
There are two categories of upholstery frames: fully upholstered and
exposed wood. They use different assembly techniques and have different
qual i t y requirements.
Fully upholstered frames are commonly assembled w i t h glue and mechanical
fasteners; namely, nails, staples and corrugated fasteners. The legs are
the only exposed wood and they are prefinished by d i p p i n g or spraying prior
t o assembly. Depending upon the configuration of the chair, the front and
back components are usually sub-assembled f i r s t . I n assembly, one-way
pressure i s used t o obtain a quick s e t up and t o avoid distortion. The
back sub-assembly contains the most parts w i t h back posts, back r a i l s ,
uprights and braces. There are many variations i n the assembly of these
components. Certain frames require a complicated side construction, i n
which case, some manufacturers sub-assembl e the sides f i r s t . The number
of sub-assembly and assembly stations i s dictated by the particular frame
being assembled.
Upholstery frames having exposed wood parts have many o f the same problems
experienced w i t h dining chairs. Fronts and backs are usually sub-assembled
and undergo additional machining. Extreme care must be used i n assembling
the frame t o avoid damaging i t . High-frequency electrodes are used wherever
possible,and in general, much more attention i s given t o exposed wood frames.
Spring-up i s not normally considered a part of frame assembly; however, i t
could very well be. Many problems a r i s e when spring-up i s done a f t e r finish-
i n g , not the l e a s t o f which i s a damaged finish. A t the main clamp, i t i s
often helpful t o use wide crown staples on upholstery frames i n order to
pull and hold j o i n t s t i g h t . Bar clamps are sometimes used on complicated
frames w i t h numerous joints. Finally i t i s a good procedure t o accurately
machine and then glide a l l legs prior t o assembly as i t eliminates a great
deal o f handling.
COMMENTS
Assembly o f furniture i s the least standardized operation i n the industry.
I t varies w i t h the construction of the furniture and i t depends on traditions.
Once a layout i s made for a certain assembly method, another may no longer
be feasible.
Many assembly departments are f e r t i l e ground f o r methods improvements.
An e f f o r t along these lines will generally run into t h i s problem: An
assembly run may be f o r one to three hours only, and a methods engineer
will n o t be able t o study the line i n t h a t short time period. So he
naturally s t a r t s looking for operations that occur i n every piece
assembled on that line. This leads t o the request for standardization
of construction.
XI-24
F I N I S H I NG METHODS
INTRODUCTION
FINISHING SCHEDULES
All finishing materials have be to applied. Some of them receive a wet
treatment such as wiping. All materials have t o dry or cure and some o f
them receive a dry treatment, namely sanding. In a l l these processes,
time plays an important role. I t i s obvious t h a t the drying takes a
minimum time and t h a t t h i s time depends on temperature. Generally there
i s no maximum. For economical reasons we generally stick close t o the
minimum. When drying i s done i n an oven a t elevated temperatures, the
wet film must be allowed t o flash off. I n essence t h i s means t h a t air
and solvent vapor bubbles must be allowed t o r i s e and break through the
surface before a "skin" i s formed. Usually two t o ten minutes are needed.
Another consequence of the elevated oven temperature may be the need for
a subsequent cooling period.
A l i s t of a l l f i n i s h i n g steps, together w i t h the>desired times and
temperatures for flash o f f , drying and cooling, i s called a f i n i s h i n g
schedule. In Chapter XI11 we shall also use this term t o describe the
same schedule with operation times added to them. To distinguish these
different finishing schedules from each other, the example given i n
Table XII-2 c a r r i e s the s u b t i t l e "Materials Schedule."
Simple schedules may show half as many coats; complex schedules, almost twice
the number of coats. (When a manufacturer is bragging a b o u t a 34-step finish.
application, drying and sanding are counted as three steps.)
METHODS OF APPLICATION
The following methods can be used:
1. brushing
2. spraying
3. dipping
4. pouring
5. r o l l e r coating
6. curtain coating
7. printing
8. tumbling
9. pressing.
In deciding between these methods, there are several considerations:
1. Shape of the object t o be finished.
2. Desi red appearance.
3. Cost of f i n i s h i n g materials.
4. Cost of f i n i s h i n g equipment.
5. Cost of f i n i s h i n g labor.
The shape of the furniture will often interfere w i t h several methods. For
instance, a chest cannot be dipped because finishing materials would end up
where they should n e t be; a chest cannot be r o l l e r coated because t h a t pro-
cess i s only suited f o r panels. Labor cost rules o u t brushing, etc.
XII-5
In most furniture factories, a major reason for using the spray process
i s that i t allows such a variety of shapes and sizes t o be finished on
the same equipment. In the U.S. furniture industry spraying i s used i n
approximately 90% of a l l finishing systems.
SPRAYING
In a l l spraying processes the finishing material i s subdivided i n very
small droplets which travel through the a i r as a mist. The droplets
h i t the surface in a random fashion and when enough overlapping has
occurred, they form together a wet film. The method of subdividing the
1 iquid, often called atomization, i s variable.
The parts of a conventional spray gun are shown i n Figure XII-1.
A. Air Cap
B. Fluid T i p
C. Fluid Needle
D. Trigger
E. Fluid Adj. Screw
F. Air Valve
G . Spreader Adj. Value
H. Gun Body
w
Figure XII-1: Conventional Air Spray
The a i r cap i s a t the f r o n t of the gun and d i r e c t s the compressed a i r
into the material stream t o atomize i t and form i t i n t o a spray. The
cross section of t h i s spray i s called the spray pattern. There are various
caps producing different sizes and shapes o f pattern f o r a l l types
of applications.
The f l u i d t i p i s d i r e c t l y behind the a i r cap and meters and d i r e c t s the
material into the a i r streams. The f l u i d t i p forms a seat f o r the f l u i d
needle which shuts off the flow of material. Fluid t i p s are available
i n a variety o f nozzle sizes to properly handle materials of various types
and pass the required volume of material f o r different speeds o f application.
The trigger of the gun operates the a i r valve t o allow a i r t o pass through
the a i r cap. Further travel o f the trigger operates the needle and releases -
the finishing material. The two-part actlon o f the trigger makes i t possible
t o use the gun t o blow dust from the surface of the furniture by pulling the ~
-
COAT PROCESS NEEDED TIME
(Min: )
1 SAP STAIN SP ray
a i r dry .5 m i n .
2 NGR OVERALL STAIN spray
a i r dry 4.5 m i n .
3 TONER spray
flash 5.0 min.
oven - 200F. 3.0 m i n .
cool 3.0 m i n .
sand
4 WASH COAT spray
flash 5.0 m i n .
oven - 200F. 3.0 min.
cool 3.0 m i n .
sand
5 FILLER spray
wipe
pre-heat - 130 t o 180F. 5.0 m i n .
oven - 210F. 8.0 m i n .
cool 10.0 m i n .
6 SHADE spray
a i r dry .5 m i n .
7 SEALER spray
flash 12.0 m i n .
oven - 210F. 3.0 m i n .
cool 4.0 m i n .
sand
8 GLAZE spray
wipe
oven - 210F. 5.0 m i n .
cool 5.0 m i n .
9 FIRST TOPCOAT spray
a i r dry 20.0 m i n .
10 PAD/GUN SHADE apply
11 SECOND TOPCOAT spray
clean tops
flash 15.0 m i n .
pre-heat 130 t o 180F. 6.0 m i n .
=
The spreader adjustment valve controls the a i r to the horn holes which
regulate the size o f a spray pattern from maximum w i d t h down t o a narrow
or round pattern.
Spray guns are made w i t h suction cups and pressure cups, b u t f o r pro-
duction work the finishing material i s supplied through a hose from a
pressure tank near the booth or more commonly from a remote storage and
pumpi ng s t a t ion.
For the application of heavy coats o f certain materials, i t i s desirable
t o spray these a t elevated temperatures. Hot spray systems involve supply
and return lines as the material must be circulated constantly t o main-
t a i n the temperature.
I t i s also possible t o atomize a liquid by releasing i t under high pressure
through a small o r i f i c e . This principle i s used i n a i r l e s s spray. An air-
less spray system i s shown in Figure XII-2.
I' 4
. I
W
Feed Speed: 25-100 FPM Feed Speed: 25-100 FPM
App.: 1-3 lbs./M sq. ft.' (Sealers) App.: 1-5 lbs./M Sq.ft.
2-8 lbs./M sq. ft. (base c t . ) f i r s t roll is textured,
Roll Coater Precision Coater
C-L-
-4
For f i l l e r w i p i n g and for sanding sealer, small work areas per man suffice.
Good lighting i s required. Sometimes dust collection systems are used b u t
i t i s generally d i f f i c u l t t o catch the d u s t that i s generated over such a
large area. Most plants rely on the next spray operator t o blow i t off i n
the booth.
FINISHING MATERIALS STORAGE
F i n i s h i n g materials are generally stored i n 55 gallon drums or i n large
tanks. In the l a t t e r case, the system is referred t o as bulk storage.
For materials t h a t are used commonly such as sealer and lacquer, bulk storage
is preferred for a l l medium and large casegoods plants. The advantage over
drums i s :
1. Lower price per gal lon for bulk shipments
2. Lower handling cost
3. Lower quality control costs.
When some of the f i r s t b u l k storage systems were installed, the tanks were
paid for o u t o f the lower unit cost the f i r s t time they were f i l l e d u p .
(However, the one-time savings d i d not cover p i p i n g and i n s t a l l a t i o n . )
The lower handling cost i s rather obvious and i s n o t restricted t o the
delivery of the finishing material. During use, the switch over from drum
t o drum involves labor too.
I t is desirable t o t e s t finishing materials before use , and the larger the
batch, the lower the cost per g a l l o n . I t i s true t h a t one can obtain large
shipments o f the same manufacturing batch in drums, b u t when drums are used,
purchased batches tend t o be more modest.
Materials such as stains are switched from suite t o suite and are more con-
veniently handled in modest q u a n t i t i e s , so drums are the rule. Figure XII-7
shows a modern pump room where various color materials are pumped directly
from the drum w i t h pneumatic pumps. Note t h a t some mixing goes on as well.
Not a l l purchased materials are used "as i s . "
FINISHING MATERIALS USAGE
The exact amount of finishing materials used i s best obtained by experiment.
When the finishing materials usage must be estimated from a drawing, one can
use tables such as Table XII-3 and Table XII-4. Such a table s h o u l d be adjusted
Synthetic Top Coats . . . 400 600 600-800 400-600 I liquid gallon, applied at 1 mil wet, covers 1,600
Clear Lacquers . ... . ... 250 ...600-800 400-600
... ...
square feet.
Lacquer Toners . . . . . . . ,250 Examples: A t 4 mils, 1 gallon covers 400 square feet.
Lacquer Base-Coats . . . . 200 ... 300 350-450 A t 8 mils, 1 gallon covers 200 square feet.
Enamel Undercoats . . . . 350 400 450 450-500 3. Modern Airless Spray will give approximately 12 t o
Oil Enamels ... ..... .. 400 450 500 500 15% greater coverage than conventional spray. %hove
Lacquer Enamels . . . . . . 200 ... . .. 500-600 figures for spray are based on conventional spray.
METAL SURFACES
Lac uer Primers . .. . .. 250 . .. ... ... TO FINDTHE NUMBEROF GALLONS REQUIRED: Divide
O i l l r i m e r s . .......... 400 400
Lacquer Enamels * . . . . . 250 ...
......
... the number of square f e e t in a g i v e n number of
articles t o be coated b v the f i g u r e s in the above table
Oil Enamels .......... 350 450 450 ... f o r the t y p e of goods and method o f application to
Synthetic Enamels . . . . . 300 400 400 . .. be used. T h e resultixy f i g u r e will be the number of
Wrinkle Finishes . . . . . . 200 . . . ... ... gallons of material, reduced r e a d y f o r use, that will
Hammer Finishes . . . .. 350 ... ... ... be required f o r that number of pieces o f work.
for an experimentally measured efficiency (often lower than 60%) and the
desired wet film thickness.
THE F I N I S H I N G CONVEYOR
I NTRODUCTI ON
In a l l departments of a furniture factory the materials h a n d l i n g system i s
an important auxiliary t o the production machinery. In the f i n i s h i n g room
materials handling becomes the dominant partner i n a manner of speaking.
The f i n i s h i n g conveyor dictates w h a t can be and w h a t cannot be done. I t
represents an investment many times larger than the finishing equipment
itself .
In non-conveyorized f i n i s h i n g systems, about an equal amount of labor i s
spent on finishing and materials handling. Thus the conveyor saves a great
deal of money. An important feature of the conveyor i s t h a t i t paces the
work. This has a beneficial e f f e c t on the production r a t e quite apart from
the materials handling aspect. I t i s also helpful i n making the job much
more uniform from one load t o the next. In a non-conveyorized drying oven
there i s always the danger of f i r s t - i n , last-out resulting i n nonuniformity.
With a l l these advantages i t i s l i t t l e wonder t h a t v i r t u a l l y a l l f i n i s h i n g
rooms are conveyorized.
The disadvantage mentioned sometimes i s the d i f f i c u l t y i n 1 ine balancing.
If spraying stain takes 1.2 minutes and spraying washcoat only 1 .O minutes,
the conveyor is forced t o travel a t the pace of the slower operation. In
practice though, spraying operations take very similar amounts of time.
Sanding and w iping operations generally take a multiple of that. The
balancing i s obtained by having one operator (or two) i n every booth and
selecting the crew size f o r wiping and sanding t o get the balance.
TYPES OF CONVEYORS
The Overhead Conveyor
The overhead conveyor (see Figure XIII-1) has a chain which travels on some
k i n d of track. The chain i s equipped w i t h skate wheels which travel i n or
on a track. To the chain a number of c a r r i e r s are connected a t even spacings.
In a chair plant these c a r r i e r s are just hooks holding the chairs; i n a
casegoods factory they are suspended platforms. The c a r r i e r i s connected
by means of a swivel j o i n t which locks i n four positions. This means the
conveyor can travel the narrowest path possible. One major advantage o f
L I I I ~type o f eoiiveyor is t h a t i t can be adapted easily t~ a t w w f l ~ o ropera-
AL.2
.#
tion. In chair plants quite often the drying ovens are overhead.
XIII-2
track
wheels
chain
swivel j o i n t locking
in 4 positions
Side View
(smal 1e r scal e )
Cross Section
The pallet conveyor consists of a number of pallets usually about 30" x 72"
which have a pin a t the center. The pallet rides on two tracks w h i c h have
skate wheels spaced close together. The pin travels t h r o u g h a s l o t in which
track with
/ pal 1e t /, wheels pin
-'
chain
Side View
guide t o prevent
track with wheels
I
.c=c<x=3=-- - I
chain
Top View
- motion
Pallets o f 2 a/, x 6 feet are often spaced about nine f e e t center t o center.
This allows work t o be done on a l l sides. However, t h i s i s rather wasteful
f o r drying periods. In the closepac arrangement the pallets are f i r s t turned
so t h a t they are traveling i n the 2 l / 2 f o o t dimension direction. Then the chain
i s lowered so t h a t i t s connection w i t h the pallet becomes disengaged. The
r e s u l t i s t h a t the p a l l e t i s no longer pushed forward. I t remains stationary
until the next p a l l e t wns into i t and pushes i t forward. As a result a
s e r i e s of p a l l e t s i s moved together, one s p o t each time another pallet has
r u n into i t . A t the end of the closepac l i n e the chain i s raised and i t
picks off the p a l l e t s and they resume normal progression.
XI 11-4
per day
-
T h i s example s h w s th,t the tPK! approaches d o n ' t always yield the same
answer. Clearly we cannot violate e i t h e r principle. However, we can make ~
The schedule i n Table XIII-2 shows 1.4 m i n . for each spraying operation,
and t h a t means the conveyor travels through the booth i n 1.4 m i n . The
average time available for work is s t i l l 0.9 min./pallet.
The crew size for the spray operation = 1 operator
If the required drying time i s 5.0 minutes, we use the same 5.0 minutes i n
the conveyor schedule for the time through the oven.
Sanding toner takes 3.2 man-minutes. That means a crew size of
3.2 man-minutes/pal l e t = 4 operators
0.9 minutes/pal l e t
These 4 people can be accommodated i n a work area of 22 f e e t , which means
22 f t . = 2.0 min.
T0.73 FPM
DRYING TIME
COAT PROCESS OPERATION TIME
(min.)
0 LOAD 1oad 0.7
1 SAP STAIN spray 0.8
a i r dry 0.5
2 NGR OVERALL STAIN spray 0.9
a i r dry 4.5
3 TONER s Pray 0.9
f 1ash 5.0
oven -200" F 3.0
cool 3 .O
sand 3.2
4 WASH COAT spray 0.8
flash 5 .O
oven-200F 3 .O
cool 3 .O
sand 3.2
5 FILLER spray 0.9
wipe 7.7
preheat-l30/1 80F 5 .O
oven-210F 8 .O
cool 10.0
6 SHADE spray 0.9
a i r dry 0.5
7 SEALER spray 0.9
flash 12.0
oven-210F 3 .O
cool 4.0
sand 6.0
8 GLAZE spray 0.8
wipe 8.5
oven-21 OF 5 .O
cool 5.0
9 FIRST TOPCOAT spray 0.9
a i r dry 20.0
10 PAD/GUN SHADE apply 0.9
11 SECOND TOPCOAT spray 0.9
c l e a n tops 0.7
flash 15.0
preheat-1 30/180F 6.0
oven-210F 6.0
cool 2.0
12 UNLGAD nmtn7n.A
UII I uau A
u.1
1
I I I I , jl , e , ,
1 1 1 1 ~
1
k--0.9
e 8 8 8 0 8 8 -
I " I
k-- 1.4 m i d
Figure XIII-6: Space/Conveyor Time Relationship
All these conversions say i s t h a t the spray operator gets a l i t t l e more
than "his share" and the wipers get a l i t t l e less t h a n " t h e i r share" (by
doubling up).
The loading and unloading operations have received a l o t more than their
"share . I ' Loading a t a point i s not really practical. An area of 50 feet
is not a luxury. The RETURN entry i s new. While return cannot be measured
until the layout i s made, i t i s good practice t o add i n an "estimate."
T h a t way we include a t l e a s t something f o r i t i n the project budget.
Once a l l the operations have been accounted f o r i n the conveyor schedule,
we can add the conveyor times (and the crew). In the example the total
conveyor time i s 182.4 minutes.
Conveyor l e n g t h = 182.4 min. x 10.73 FPM = 1957 f t .
The conveyor length has changed from the calculation on page XIII-10.
Conveyor length NORMAL = 84.0 m i n . x 10.73 FPM = 901 f t .
Conveyor length CLOSEPAC = 98.4 m i n . x 2.78 FPM = 274 f t .
Total conveyor length = 1175 f t .
# of p a l l e t s 55
l-3 = 55 pallets
No CLOSEPAC has been introduced because drying times were quite short.
In laying o u t a new f i n i s h i n g conveyor, one should be f a i r l y conservative
i n the choice o f drying times. In the future other finishing materials may
be used requiring longer times. Or, more commonly, production requirements
a r e increased and the only answer i s t o increase the conveyor speed. Are
the booths large enough t o allow two operators t o work side by side? Can
we increase the temperature and/or change the formulation of the finishing
materials t o "get by" w i t h half as much drying time? Some of these questions
should be anticipated a t the time of planning the project.
Once the f i n i s h i n g conveyor is installed, i t becomes the constraint by which
the selection of finishing schedules must be made. The more generous time
estimates used by engineering t o set up the conveyor, the less restricting
these constraints will be.
CHAPTER X I V
IN T RO DUCT I ON
I t used t o be t h a t most casegoods firms had a " r u b room." Tops of medium
and h i g h priced furniture were given several topcoats. The h i g h build finish
had t o be rubbed because of the orange peel appearance and because i t was the
"standard" treatment.
The fashion i n finishes has changed. Now most wood tops receive a "close t o
the wood" k i n d of f i n i s h , w i t h open or semi-open pores. Perhaps this i s done
t o show that the top i s "not a p r i n t . " For a l o t of the medium priced furni-
ture, the high pressure laminate tops have become standard construction.
Rubbing i s therefore limited t o certain classes of furniture such a s , f o r
example, mahogany. In the r u b b i n g and packing department many a c t i v i t i e s take
place. A complete l i s t comprises:
1. Rubbing and polishing
2. Attaching hardware o r
3. Inserting hardware f o r mounting by r e t a i l e r
4. Securing drawers f o r shipment
5. Placing the glass i n mirror frames
6. General cleanup
7. Final inspection
8. Touchup i f needed
9. Packing and labeling.
RUBBING AND POLISHING
Rubbing i s the c u t t i n g down w i t h sandpaper of the t o p coat t o make i t complete-
l y level. Grit s i z e s used are 320, 360, or 400 f o r the f i r s t r u b b i n g operation
and up t o 600 for the second and final step. Most [ b u t not a l l ) finishing
materials have a tendency t o coagulate and form hard l i t t l e ''warts'' on the
sandpaper. These warts gouge the surface, leaving i t i n very bad condition.
Thus the sanding i s normally done i n a lubricant which can be a soapy aqueous
solution or i t can be a mineral o i l . These lubricants keep the removed
material i n suspension and prevent the coagulation. The use of aqueous
soiutions requires soiiie care. I f the w a t e r gets t o t h e wrong p?7ace, !t c a m s
swelling and poor appearance. The people involved i n rubbing will generally
wipe the surface clean and dry imnediately following the r u b b i n g operation.
XIV-2
HARDWARE OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
In casegoods furniture companies there i s , generally, a finished goods
inventory of some size. In the majority of the upholstered furniture
industry (and i n very few casegoods companies as well) finished goods a r e
produced t o order and shipped very soon a f t e r manufacturing. Therefore,
finished goods warehouses are comon only i n the casegoods industry. Multi-
plant companies very often have one or a few very large warehouses receiving
goods from several plants.
Of course, every company needs a s h i p p i n g department. When a finished goods
warehouse is present, s h i p p i n g is p a r t o f the warehouse setup. This chapter
i s about such warehouses.
A typical casegoods producer may "cut around the line'' i n three months and
have a finished goods inventory equivalent t o one month's production. In t h a t
inventory we will find some 80% of the company's l i n e i n varying quantities
and the other 20% o f the items will be out of stock. If there were such a
thing as perfect forecasting, 80%of the suites would have a l l items in stock
and 20% o f the suites would have no inventory a t a l l . Since the forecast i s
necessarily imperfect, there w i 11 be some suites w i t h significant inventory
levels of some items and no inventory on others. Trade practices vary, b u t
i n general, the r e t a i l e r s will n o t accept incomplete shipments w i t h some
items backordered. First of a l l , the r e t a i l customer will not accept a
bedroom s u i t e without the dresser*, and second,the r e t a i l e r does not l i k e the
higher t o t a l freight b i l l f o r the broken order.
The situation i s even less tolerant of deviations when carload orders are
received. The f r e i g h t differential on a backorder i s more substantial. When
a carload order f o r one s u i t e i s received and some items are out of stock,
the solution i s straightforward. When the s u i t e is cut next, the carload
shipment i s made up and sent together. A medium size West Coast r e t a i l e r
m i g h t not be able t o order a carload of one s u i t e , b u t t o have a competitive
cost he s t i l l wants t o get the carload freight advantage. So he orders a
mixed car, consisting of three s u i t e s . Now, i f we w a i t until a l l items are
i n stock a t the same time, we m i g h t never ship. Consequently some of the
current inventory i s s e t aside f o r this shipment. This may be a "paper"
transaction only, o r i t may involve placing the items i n a "reserved" area.
When a carload is assembled f o r s h i p p i n g i t will take several hours to get
the merchandise together, depending on warehouse layout and the way the work
i s organized. Most carloads and almost a l l truck loads are accumulated before
they are loaded. Trucks typically will drop shipments i n a dozen places
and the loading must be i n reverse order of the delivery schedule.
1.n the warehouse/shipping department then, we will f i n d :
1. Finished goods inventory waiting f o r future retailers'
orders.
2. Partial carloads accumulated for shipment w i t h i n six
weeks or so.
3. Partial and f u l l carloads and truckloads accumulated
f o r shipment w i t h i n a day or so.
4. Truck loading docks.
5. Rail loading docks.
6. A materials handling system.
7. An office.
MATERIALS HANDLING
The design o f a warehouse i s dominated by the materials handling method.
The choice i s between:
1. Overhead conveyor.
2. Forklifts, squeeze l i f t s and "hook l i f t s . "
3. In-fl oor chain conve.yor.
4. Mi xed methods.
The f o r k l i f t systems are most appropriate i n single story warehouses of
moderate size. In large warehouses the f o r k l i f t spends too much time i n
travel. Some warehouses employ a "train" concept for carrying 20 or 30
pieces over a considerable distance w i t h f o r k l i f t s s t a n d i n g by a t each end
of the trip.
Overhead conveyor systems are tailor-made for multi-story warehouses.
In a l l material handling considerations i t should be understood that there
are two k i n d s of t r a f f i c , one into the warehouse and one out of i t . The
rhythm of these moves i s very different. Furniture comes i n cuttings and
goes i n mixed shipments. For example, 200 dressers may be produced i n a
six hour time span along w i t h 200 mirrors and 80 beds. The dressers w i l l
be stored i n warehouse bays t h a t are adjacent i f these are available,
In gerierdi they are not. As soon as a bay i s empty, something i s moved
i n . This means t h a t most often 32 dressers go i n t o one bay, 32 dressers
-AX
xv-4
go into another somewhere e l s e and so on. The dressers arrive a t 100 second
intervals. When the dressers leave, an order-picker may collect just two
and no others will be needed for several days. The t r a f f i c into the warehouse
i s f a i r l y homogeneous and the t r a f f i c out of the warehouse i s not.
One concept i s t o make u n i t loads o f , say, 8 dressers on a large pal l e t . The
cartons are held together w i t h string or tape. These u n i t loads are b u i l t up
i n a staging area and they are then dispatched t o storage. In a separate
area, immediately adjacent t o s h i p p i n g , we keep one u n i t load of each furni-
ture item on hand a t a l l times. This means that the long distance moves are
always f o r a u n i t load and the frequent order picking moves are short distance
always.
set the target inventory levels in dollars. The dollars figure must be
translated into beds, mirrors, dressers and so on. A weighted average
must be used f o r the price level. For example, i f sales r e f l e c t
60% of $ sales i n $250.00 - $350.00 suites,
20% o f $ sales i n $350.00 - $450.00 suites,
20% of $ sales in $450.00 - $550.00 suites,
then an inventory of $1,000,000.00 works o u t t o be
$600,000.00 f $300.00 or 2000 suites @ $300.00
$200,000.00 I $400.00 o r 500 suites @ $400.00
$200,000.00 I $500.00 o r 400 suites @ $500.00
o r a t o t a l of 2900 suites
f o r an average cost of $1,000,000.00 I 2900 or $345.00. If the company has
a $349.00 suite, t h a t might be used t o convert dollars t o surface area.
The next item t o consider i s stacking h e i g h t . If cases are manually stacked,
two i s the usual l i m i t f o r chests and three f o r dressers. When a squeeze
l i f t i s used, one can go as h i g h as four on chests and f i v e on dressers, b u t
the conservative practice i s t o go three and four.
Pre-palletized cases are generally stacked two h i g h per pallet and two pallets
h i g h f o r a t o t a l of four.
Beds and mirrors are most often stored standing on edge and only one h i g h .
Casegoods I
I
29,455 I 4,112.5 I 0.140
Man-hours/Piece e 2
- Man-hours/Da
INTRODUCTION
The Profit and Loss Statement gives only one aspect of cost. Basically
there are three "viewpoints" of cost:
1. Historical Record.
This i s cost a f t e r the fact. The record may be for the company
as a whole,as for instance, the P and L Statement. I t also may
be the record showing the cost of manufacturing i n one o f the
company's plants or the record showing the cost of manufacturing
f o r a certain cutting. Materials Cost summaries or Direct Labor
Cost summaries are other forms of the historical record.
2. Predicted Cost.
Before decisions relative t o pricing new designs and modifying
construction details can be made, one has t o know a reasonably
accurate estimate of the manufacturing cost. If predicted cost
were accurate and nothing unforeseen would happen d u r i n g manu-
facturing, the historical record ( a f t e r the f a c t ) should agree
w i t h the predicted cost (before the f a c t ) . In r e a l i t y , an
approximate agreement i s quite common b u t a close one occurs
less often.
I t i s obvious t h a t accuracy o f predicted cost i s essential to
good business. I f , for example, half the 1 ine were underpriced
and h a l f the l i n e were overpriced, i t stands t o reason t h a t
the underpriced items will s e l l b e t t e r t h a n the overpriced ones.
A loss will occur i f the discrepancies i n prediction have caused
the pricing t o be too f a r out of line.
3. Standard Cost.
Predicted cost i s usually based on standards. These standards
cover such diverse items as f i n i s h i n g materials prices, lumber
y i e l d , standard machine hours, assembly conveyor pace and crew
s i z e , etc. I t i s often good t o convert these standards t o a
common dimension so that one can judge the relative importance.
I f this common dimension i s d o l l a r s , then one can speak of cost
standards.
As said before, these standards are used t o predict the cost of
new designs. B u t also, a f t e r the new design i s i n production,
these standards can be very useful. One may compare, on a day-
to-day or on a week-to-week or on a cutting-to-cutting basis,
the standard on the one hand w i t h the historical record (the
actual cost) on the other. This gives us a performance yardstick.
Standard cost used i n t h i s manner is a most important management
tool.
The difference between predicted cost and standard cost may seem to be non-
existent. An example may c l a r i f y t h i s . Say, a dresser i s designed and the
manufacturing cost i s estimated. The resulting predicted cost may be a
t a b l e shnwing var!'nus cnst e!ementsa birt t h e s P l n t ?:mpnrtant e n t r y i s t h e
XVI -3
total cost per dresser. This total will include a certain margin of safety
t o absorb the delays and the waste that may occur. Whether this marqin i s
3% o r 10%will depend on the degree of control t h a t management has over the
operation (and sometimes on the amount of wishful t h i n k i n g that went into
the standards ) .
The standard cost will be figured on a department basis per time u n i t or,
more commonly, per cutting. Often a l l pieces of furniture (dressers, chests,
n i g h t tables) o f a cutting order are added together. For instance, the
rough end may be allowed a given standard number o f dollars worth of ma-
hogany, gum, e t c . , f o r a cutting order as well a s a given standard number of
dollars worth of labor. I f the record shows an excess amount used, one can
see where t h i s excess occurred and i t i s possible t o take steps to improve
future performance. I t i s quite common that the standards are a b i t t i g h t
and t h a t management i s well pleased w i t h a performance where actual costs
exceed standards by 2 or 3%. If a 10 or 12% discrepancy i s accepted without
complaint, the standards are n o t r e a l i s t i c for the factory as i t operates.
One should s e t a target performance a t a level that makes attaining i t
possible under favorable conditions. Once the standard i s reached frequently
one should consider tightening up so as t o provide an incentive f o r the
plant management and s t a f f t o further improve efficiency.
THE ELEMENTS
Everything t h a t i s being paid by a furniture company (with the obvious
exception of dividends and taxes on earnings) i s part of the product cost.
T h i s includes a great diversity o f elements such as the cost o f lumber,
postage stamps, sandpaper, the wages o f machine room labor, the s a l a r i e s
of the plant engineers, supervisors, the cost of maintenance, the deprecia-
tion o f buildings and equipment, and a host of other items. There i s an
obvious need t o arrange these cost elements in an orderly fashion;and the
standard method f o r doing t h i s i s a breakdown i n t o d i r e c t materials, d i r e c t
labor and factory overhead. Table XVI-2 shows the cost of products sold
broken down for the P and L Statement.
In the P and L Statement, we a r e concerned primarily w i t h the cost o f goods
sold and n o t w i t h the cost of those products which have been manufactured
and which are s t i l l i n the company's own warehouse. On the other hand, when
making cost calculations based on materials used, wages paid, e t c . , the only
practical figure i s the cost of goods produced. From plant figures we deter-
mine the cost of goods produced and convert this figure t o the cost o f goods
sold by adding the cost of the starting inventory and subtracting the cost
of the ending inventory. Table XVI-2 shows t h i s conversion.
I n the following presentation we shall consider each of the major cost
elements, d i r e c t materials, direct labor and factory overhead separately.
First the annual total will be considered and then the ways and means to
d i s t r i b u t e the total over the products which have been manufactured.
XVI-4
XYZ FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, RALEIGH, N.C.
P r o f i t and Loss Statement f o r Year Ending
December 31, 1968
(Cost o f Goods Sold)
* % o f Net Sales
Lumber $ 2,879,834 21.4
Plywood, Veneer 1,641,276 12.2
Glue, F i n i s h i n g M a t e r i a l s 686,312 5.1
Other M a t e r i a l s 592.117 -
4.4
DIRECT MATERIALS $ 5,799,539 43.1
D i r e c t Labor Wages $ 2,058,951 15.3
Social Security, Benefits (Direct
Labor ) 148,027 -
1.1
DIRECT LABOR $ 2,206,978 16.4
! Length
of
Product
J
Allowance f o r waste when using
FAS
I
#1 c
I
#2C
< 20 30% 50% 8041
20-30 40% 60% 100%
30-40 50% 80% 130%
40- 50 60% 100% 170%
50-60 70% 120% 220%
FACTORY OVERHEAD
All cost items that are n o t covered by the previous categories, materials
and d i r e c t labor, are part of the overhead. I f we exclude selling and
administrative cost elements , we speak of factory overhead, commonly
abbreviated F.O.H. There are many diverse elements t h a t a r e p a r t of the
F.O.H.
1. The Cost of Owning the Plant.
Building Depreciation. The cost o f factory buildings i s spread
out over many years. In principle the period represents the
expected useful l i f e o f the building. I t i s possible t h a t the
l i f e expectancy i s different for the building structure, for the
mechanical installation (plumbing heating) and f o r the electrical
installation ( w i r i n g , lighting). In t h a t case i t i s possible t o
use a different period for the depreciation of the building, i t s
mechanical installation and i t s e l e c t r i c a l installation. However ,
most plants will group a l l these items together and depreciate
buildings plus installation i n 30 or 40 years. Often depreciation
i s as f a s t as the tax laws allow.
Equipment Depreciation. Machines are p a i d f o r i n a manner similar
t o t h a t for the building. The expected useful l i f e of a machine
i s based on expected wear and tear, b u t most important, i t i s a l s o
based on obsolescence. When more e f f i c i e n t equipment i s available,
one can simply not afford t o keep working w i t h the old models. Ob-
viously,obsolescence will d i f f e r between various categories o f
machines. For example, i t may be reasonable to depreciate a rip
saw i n f i f t e e n years and an automatic shaper i n six years. Equip-
ment depreciation i s f i r s t of a l l a means o f charging the money
paid f o r the machines to the production made w i t h them. B u t i t
i s , i n a sense, also a means to generate the funds f o r equipment
replacement. In an existing plant, i t may well be t h a t the annual
replacement of equipment i s roughly the same a s the depreciation
figure f o r machinery.
Land. Land does not lessen i n value and, therefore, there i s no
depreciation.
Interest: If money i s borrowed t o pay f o r buildings, land o r
equipment, the i n t e r e s t charges on the loan are a cost item. The
i n t e r e s t may be based on the remaining balance. I t i s possible
to design a depreciation schedule i n such a way that depreciation
p l u s i n t e r e s t i s a constant amount each year. Such schedules can
be found i n any textbook on engineering economy. On the other hand,
i f the money i s not borrowed from a lender, b u t stock i s sold t o
stockholders, there i s no i n t e r e s t . Obviously the stockholders
expect a dividend,but they are only e n t i t l e d t o one i f and when
a p r o f i t i s made. Therefore, the dividends are not p a r t of the
cost picture.
XVI-11
I NT RODU CT I ON
The historical cost record i s of great interest. I t t e l l s how well a
company d i d o r how poorly. I f i t i s accurately determined and calculated
i n some d e t a i l , i t shows which products were the money makers and which
were merely dead weight. Historical cost i s a management tool. One can
learn from the past and apply this knowledge t o the future. B u t f o r the
day-to-day o r week-to-week management of a manufacturing company, there
should be more t h a n the historical record. There is a need f o r a standard
w i t h which t o compare the historical record. Only by such comparisons is
i t possible t o decide where improvements and corrections should be made.
Also, there i s the need of a cost prediction f o r the purpose of pricing new
merchandise or, better perhaps, f o r deciding whether a possible addition t o
the product l i n e will show a p r o f i t when sold a t a given price.
Is there any difference between the standard and the prediction? For pre-
dicted cost one overall figure would be sufficient. For standard cost a
breakdown i s essential. B u t i t should be realized t h a t there i s no way of
making a good prediction of the whole w i t h o u t making a l o t of estimates of
the component parts. Therefore b o t h the predicted cost and the standard
cost are b u i l t u p from the same elements. The only difference i s i n the use
t o which they are p u t .
The question may be raised whether the historical cost could n o t serve as
a standard. T h i s is possible f o r certain cost elements and sometimes f o r
a l l elements of certain styles. If a s t y l e has been manufactured f o r many
years, the records constitute a standard of some sort. B u t for most styles
this is not practical as the mortality r a t e of the design i s too h i g h . The
f i r s t two cuttings are more expensive than those following. There are s t i l l
some bugs t h a t must be removed. Modifications are made during the f i r s t and
second cuttings. On the whole this record i s n o t a good yardstick. The
t h i r d and fourth cutting would be some standard with which t o compare the
following ones, b u t even then i t would be f a r from ideal. The same ineffi-
ciency occurring i n a l l of these cuttings would tend t o indicate good
performance.
--
In order for a standard cost t o be a good one i t must be synthetic, a t l e a s t
i n part. I t must be based on good attainable performance rather than on
the performance t h a t was attained i n the past.
XVII-2
THE BASIC PRINCIPLE
I t i s necessary t o have formulas or tables for the use of materials. For
instance ,
Net lumber + allowance dependent on dimensions,
Net hardware + allowance for spoilage,
Net finishing materials + allowance f o r overspray
and so on.
3. dollars.
XVI 1-4
Materials can be measured by:
1. weight o r volume
2. quantity
3. dol 1 ars.
I t is generally b e t t e r t o work i n terms of money. I t happens frequently
t h a t 75 cents worth of labor i s spent t o clean out a 15 cent glue container.
If the f l o o r level supervisors are t a u g h t t o measure i n terms of money, t h i s
type of t h i n g i s much less likely t o happen.
Assuming t h a t i t i s decided t o make the comparison of actual versus standard
i n terms of money, i t s t i l l remains t o be decided on what level and w i t h
what frequency the comparison i s t o be made. The level may be:
1. f o r the whole plant
2. by department
3. by sections o r groups within the department.
The frequency may be:
1. by any predetermined production period, monthly, weekly,
daily, e t c .
2. by any predetermined production run, by cutting, by
piece, e t c .
The level of the comparison i s best chosen t o correspond t o the supervisors.
The whole plant i s obviously too wide a f i e l d . To measure the "efficiency
of the superintendent" i s n o t so useful ( a t l e a s t n o t i n a furniture plant).
I t i s the purpose o f the comparison t o p i n p o i n t the weak spots. For that
reason the comparison should be made on a small enough basis so t h a t the
supervisor will know the cause. If a cabinet room w i t h 200 employees i s
exceeding the standard by 7%, t h i s i s s t i l l a b i t vague. The foreman in
charge of these 200 people may or may not know where t o look. A cabinet
room as large as t h i s will be subdivided i n t o several "lines" w i t h an assis-
tant foreman in charge of each line. A more detailed comparison might show,
for example:
Case l i n e I Labor 101.2% of standard
Case line I1 Labor 98.4% of standard
Bed l i n e Labor 129.4% of standard
Table l i n e Labor 106.2% of standard
Now i t i s obvious t h a t there was something wrong i n the bed line and the
a s s i s t a n t foreman snouid be sufficiently informed t o know just w h a t i t was
t h a t went wrong. I f he knows i t , does one need the standard? Yes, because
XVII-5
rarely will a floor-level supervisor be able t o evaluate the errors i n a
quantitative sense. I f he can, he is practicing some form of s t a n d a r d cost
on his own.
The choice of the frequency i s not so obvious. The d i f f i c u l t y of taking
the volume of production as a basis f o r the frequency i s t h a t this i s not
synchronized between the departments. In the machine room there i s so much
overlap that i t i s hard t o distinguish. A time period i s better. The
length of time should be such t h a t one s t i l l remembers the d e t a i l s . A
week i s very good, b u t some plants may consider t h a t too costly and work
on a biweekly or monthly basis. A computerized cost system can be run
economically on a very short basis.
I t i s quite possible t o work w i t h different periods f o r different cost
elements. A good system m i g h t be made up of:
1. Materials
a . Weekly lumber yield report w i t h dollar figures added.
b. Monthly report on a l l other materials.
2. Direct Labor
a. Weekly report by department section.
b. Quarterly summaries by department.
3. F.O.H.
a. Quarterly reports, broken down by categories (indirect
labor, s a l a r i e s , maintenance, e t c . )
4. Overall
a. Quarterly reports showing cost of production against
standards'.
THE USE OF STANDARDS IN ESTIMATING COST
If a standard is relatively t i g h t and/or the plant performance i s relatively
poor, then the plant will not meet the standard. As a r u l e , i t will exceed
i t . T h i s means t h a t actual ( h i s t o r i c a l ) cost is higher than the standard.
This is not bad, as long as plant personnel continue t o believe that the
standard can be met and they continue t o s t r i v e t o do so.
For pricing merchandise i t i s of course rather foolish t o use the standard
as a basis, i f we have reason t o believe t h a t i t i s not going t o be met in
the near future. Obviously we should use a percentage allowance t o compen- -
s a t e f o r the expected substandard performance. I t may be a good idea t o have
different percentages for different cost elements. For instance, the expec- ~
t a t i o n might run:
~
XVII-6
105%of lumber standard
100%of hardware standard
110%of machine room labor standard
105%of f i n i s h i n g room labor, etc.
CUTTING SIZE AND COST OF MANUFACTURING
A very important result t h a t may be obtained w i t h the use of cost standards
i s the relationship between cutting s i z e and cost. In general, the proce-
dure is t o f i n d :
1. The cost of s t a r t i n g a cutting.
2. The cost of production per piece, once the s t a r t has
been made.
W i t h these two basic figures one can calculate the manufacturing cost for
any given cutting size. A practical, although n o t perfect, method i s t o
express the manufacturing cost as follows:
A = Start-up cost.
N = C u t t i n g size ( i n units).
B = Incremental cost (per u n i t ) .
To find A and B i s easier said than done. I n many companies there i s no
way of extracting e i t h e r of these figures from the record with good accuracy.
Sometimes i t i s quite impossible t o get a good enough estimate. However,
i t should be recognized t h a t i t is s t i l l preferred to get some s l i g h t l y
erroneous result f o r the cutting s i z e vs. cost relationship over the frequent
alternative,which i s t o use one and only one cost figure regardless of
cutting size.
By way of an example, l e t ' s take a look a t a low medium-priced double
dresser. This dresser i s a typical product f o r the company that makes
i t . I t s e l l s about 100 per month, and as i t i s company pol icy t o "cut
around the line" every 60 days, i t appears on the production schedules
usually w i t h a cutting size 200. The d i r e c t cost of manufacturing has
been calculated as $47.52.
Table 1 gives the breakdown into the major cost elements. This k i n d of
breakdown i s usually trustworthy when the case is n o t one of the best nor
one of the worst s e l l e r s . So we will proceed here on the assumption that
Table 1 represents the situation correctly.
XVII-7
T o t a l Cost f o r a
Cat ego ry Total Cost p e r Piece
C u t t i n g o f 200
M a t e r i a1 s $ 25.71 I $ 5142.00
t
Department S t a r t Up Run Total
The h i g h e s t and lowest F.O.H. percentages occur i n the cabinet room. This
i s s u r e l y the cheapest department from investment, power and maintenance
viewpoints. On t h e o t h e r hand a l o t o f t h e scheduling expense i s more o r
l e s s t i e d up w i t h p a r t s storage. Thus t h e r e i s an e n t r y o f $64.00 i n the
s t a r t u p category which i s t h e expense o f c o n t r o l l i n g and managing t h e p a r t s
i n v e n t o r y , t h e i n d i r e c t l a b o r i n v o l v e d i n dispensing t h e stock.
The r e s u l t o f t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s so f a r i s contained i n s i x f i g u r e s on t h e
" t o t a l manufacturing" 1 ine, namely, $190.00 f o r d i r e c t l a b o r s t a r t u p ,
$1,724.00 f o r d i r e c t l a b o r r u n w i t h t h e corresponding $380.00 f o r F.O.H.
s t a r t u p and $1,896.00 f o r F.O.H. r u n and t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e s u b t o t a l s . The
second and f i f t h a r e d i v i d e d by t h e c u t t i n g s i z e (200) t o o b t a i n t h e r e s u l t
given i n Table X V I I - 5 .
T o t a l Mfg. Cost
.
Excl Warehouse 1 596.00 1 47.52 1
\
CM = %(C)/N = ; +
If one looks a t Table 6 alone, one would perhaps draw the conclusion t h a t
one should always make the maximum number. This i s obviously only part of
the story. We should consider the cost o f warehousing.
I t i s a convenient and acceptable approximation t o take 22.5% of the manu-
facturing cost as the annual cost of keeping stock. For high-priced furni-
t u r e the physical storage will be a lesser percentage, b u t the risk will be
somewhat h i g h e r , making this figure quite Val id for diverse situations.
Interest 10.0%
Storage 7.5%
Risk 5.0%
Total 22.5%
For a $46.00 case t h i s is $10.35
per year o r 86.256 p e r iiioiith.
- -A+ - sWo
N2 2s
= $.x8625596
= 37.2 x f l
Sales Rate
Economic T E j T n K - Cal . Days
Cutting Cost a t Needed t o
Per
Size Necon
Month
S Necon D
mi n
10 118 $ 53.82 354
20 166 50.85 249
50 263 48.21 158
100 372 46.89 115
200 526 45.94 79
500 832 45.12 50
1,000 1,177 44.70 35
2,000 i,665 44.40 25