Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

OWNERSHIP FORCIBLE ENTRY

- Summary action to recover material or


OWNERSHIP IN GENERAL physical possession of real
property when a person originally in
Art. 427. Ownership may be exercised over possession was deprived thereof by
things or rights. (n) force, intimidation, strategy, threat or
stealth(FISTS)
OWNERSHIP - Action must be brought within 1 year from
- Independent and general right of a p the dispossession
erson to control a thing particularly in - Issue involved is mere physical
his possession, enjoyment, disposition possession or possession de facto and
and recovery, subject to no restrictions not juridical possession nor ownership
except those imposed by the state or
private persons, without prejudice to the UNLAWFUL DETAINER
provisions of the law - Action that must be brought when th
e possession by a landlord,
KINDS OF OWNERSHIP vendor, vendee or other person of a
1. Full ownershipall rights of an owner ny land or building is being unlawfully
2. Naked ownershipownership where the withheld after the expiration or
right to the use and the fruits have been termination of the right to hold
denied possession, by virtue of any contract,
3. Sole ownershipownership is only vested in express or implied
one person - Action must be brought within one year
4. Co-ownership from last demand letter

Art. 428. The owner has the right to enjoy ACCION PUBLICIANA
and dispose of a thing, without other - Recovery of the better right to possess,
limitations than those established by law. and is a plenary action in an ordinary civil
proceeding before the RTC
The owner has also a right of action ag - Must be brought within a period of 10
ainst the holder and possessor of the thing years otherwise the real right to
in order to recover it. (348a) possess is lost
- Issue is possession de jure
7 RIGHTS OF AN OWNER UNDER ROMAN
LAW ACCION REINVIDICATORIA
1. Jus possidendi -The right to possess - Action to recover ownership over real
2. Jus utendi -The right to use property
3. Jus fruendi -The right to the fruits - Must be brought in the RTC
4. Jus abutendi -The right to consume - It must be brought within 10 or 30 years
5. Jus disponendi -The right to dispose as the case may be
6. Jus vindicandi -The right to recover - Issue involved is ownership and for this
7. Jus accessiones -The right to accessories purpose, evidence of title or mode may
be introduced
ACTIONS TO RECOVER - It is permissible to file both an action
1. Replevin for ownership and for detainer over
2. Accion interdictalforcible entry and the same land, and between the sa
unlawful detainer me parties, because the issues involved
3. Accion publiciana are different
4. Accion reinvidicatoria
5. Writ of possession | writ of demolition WRIT OF INJUNCTION
6. Writ of preliminary injunction - A person deprived of his possession of
real or personal property is ordinarily not
REPLEVIN allowed to avail himself of this remedy,
- An action or provisional remedy where the reason being that the defendant in
the complainant prays for the recovery of actual possession is presumed
the possession of PERSONAL disputably to have the better right
PROPERTY
WRIT OF POSSESSION
- Used in connection with the Land Re - ANALOGOUS TO THE RULE UNDER
gistration Law is an order CRIMINAL LAW
directing the sheriff to place a - Any person who, in order to avoid an
successful registrant under the Torrens evil or injury, does an act which
system in possession of the property causes damage to another doesn't incur
covered by a decree of the Court criminal liability provided that the
following requisites are present:
OWNERSHIP HAS LIMITATIONS A. That the evil sought to be avoided
1. Those given by the State or the laws actually exists
2. Those given by the owner himself B. That the injury feared be greater than
3. Those given by the person who gave the that done to avoid it
right to its present owner C. That there be no other practical or
less harmful means of preventing
Art. 429. The owner or lawful possessor of a it
thing has the right to exclude any
person from the enjoyment and disposal Art. 433. Actual possession under claim of
thereof. For this purpose, he may use such ownership raises disputable presumption of
force as may be reasonably necessary ownership. The true owner must resort to
to repel or prevent an actual or threatened judicial process for the recovery of the property.
unlawful physical invasion or usurpation of his (n)
property. (n)
REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE DISPUTABLE
DOCTRINE OF SELF-HELP PRESUMPTION
- The right to counter force with force 1. Actual possession of the property
- Comparable with self- defense under 2. Claim of ownership
justifying circumstances in Criminal Law
Art. 434. In an action to recover, the property
must be identified, and the plaintiff must
Art. 430. Every owner may enclose or fence his rely on the strength of his title and not on
land or tenements by means of walls, ditches, the weakness of the defendant's claim. (n)
live or dead hedges, or by any other means
without detriment to servitudes constituted REQUISITES IN AN ACTION TO
thereon. (388) RECOVER
1. Identity of the property
Art. 431. The owner of a thing cannot mak 2. Strength of the plaintiffs title
e use thereof in such manner as to injure the
rights of a third person. (n) Art. 435. No person shall be deprived of
his property except by competent authority
NO INJURY TO RIGHTS OF THIRD and for public use and always upon payment
PERSONS of just compensation.
- This is one of the fundamental bases
of police power and constitutes a just Should this requirement be not first complied
restriction on the right of ownership with, the courts shall protect and, in a proper
case, restore the owner in his possession.
(349a)
Art. 432. The owner of a thing has no right
to prohibit the interference of another with the EMINENT DOMAIN V. EXPROPRIATION
same, if the interference is necessary to - Eminent domain is the power of the state
avert an imminent danger and the and expropriation is the proceeding
threatened damage, compared to the damage
arising to the owner from the interference, Art. 436. When any property is condemned or
is much greater. The owner may demand seized by competent authority in the
from the person benefited indemnity for the interest of
damage to him. (n) health, safety or security, the owner thereof
shall not be entitled to compensation, unless he
STATE OF NECESSITY can show that such condemnation or seizure is
unjustified. (n)
Art. 437. The owner of a parcel of land is the
owner of its surface and of everything under it,
and he can construct thereon any works
or make any plantations and excavations w
hich he may deem proper, without detriment
to servitudes and subject to special laws
and ordinances. He cannot complain of the
reasonable requirements of aerial navigation.
(350a)

SURFACE RIGHT OF A LAND OWNER

Art. 438. Hidden treasure belongs to the o


wner of the land, building, or other property on
which it is found.

Nevertheless, when the discovery is made


on the property of another, or of the State or
any of its subdivisions, and by chance, one-
half thereof shall be allowed to the finder. If
the finder is a trespasser, he shall not be
entitled to any share of the treasure.

If the things found be of interest to science


of the arts, the State may acquire them at
their just price, which shall be divided in
conformity with the rule stated. (351a)

Art. 439. By treasure is understood, for legal


purposes, any hidden and unknown deposit of
money, jewelry, or other precious objects, the
lawful ownership of which does not appear.
(352)

RULES REGARDING HIDDEN


TREASURES
1. If the treasure is not hidden, there is no 50-
50 sharing
2. If the precious metals are in their raw state,
it will be owned by the State by virtue of the
Regalian doctrine
3. If the owner finds the treasure in his own
land, he owns the treasure
4. If finder finds it not in his own land, there is
50-50 sharing with the owner of the land
5. If the finder is hired, then compensation or
salary or fixed fee will be given to him
6. If the finder is a trespasser, then he would
not receive anything

2 SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT REGARDING


BY CHANCE
1. If there is deliberate search, it is not to
be construed as by chance
2. Even if there is a deliberate search, still by
chance since there is uncertainty of finding
a treasure

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen