Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Standard setting is a process designed to ensure that an examination is fair and equitable, and
that the same standard is applied across different examination diets. As such, it is a way of
ensuring consistency and fairness when defining the pass mark of a particular examination.
Some examination material is inherently more difficult than others, particularly as it could be
based on less commonly seen conditions. For example a question on precocious puberty may
be more difficult as most trainees will base their answer largely on theory, whereas a question
on the management of pre-eclampsia may be easier as most trainees will have clinical
experience, as well as their reading to draw upon.
Standard setting takes into account the complexity of a task so that the passing standard is
determined by actual candidate performance, rather than determining in advance a set failure
rate for the assessment. Therefore the pass mark and pass rate can fluctuate from exam sitting
to exam sitting because there is no fixed level or quota.
Ebels Method: This method accounts for the difficulty of each question as well as its
relevance to ST3 practice. Ebels focuses on determining the proportion of borderline
candidates who would respond correctly to each exam question. The borderline candidate is a
hypothetical examination candidate who is of reasonable intelligence, possesses an average
amount of clinical knowledge and who has done reasonable preparation: a candidate who
should be just at the correct standard to pass. For the Ebels method, questions are classified
as easy, medium or hard and their relevance is classified as essential, important or acceptable
which creates nine separate categories. The standard setting panel then decide what
percentage of questions they believe a borderline candidate would answer correctly from each
category.
Part 2 MRCOG
Angoff Method: This method involves a cohort of subject matter experts (O&G Consultants
in NHS practice) evaluating each question and providing an estimate as to how likely the
borderline candidate would know the answer. These estimates are averaged and added to a
standard error of measurement to determine the final pass mark. The standard error of
measurement is a measure of precision of an assessment. It indicates the amount of variability
in a test administered to a group and serves a function of both the standard deviation of
observed scores and the reliability of the test.
Part 3 MRCOG
RCOG Procedure: This method is based on taking the number of examiner judgements in a
particular examination and adding this to an additional factor as well as a standard error of
measurement (as described above). Once an exam score has been set, this is used as the
standard for assessing a competent candidate.