parents ANTONIO and RIZALINA OPOSA, et.al, petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE FULGENCIO S. FACTORAN, JR., in his capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and THE HONORABLE ERIBERTO U. ROSARIO, Presiding Judge of the RTC, Makati, Branch 66, respondents.
G.R. No. 101083 July 30, 1993
FACTS:
Plaintiffs, all minors duly represented and joined by their
parents, prayed that judgement be rendered ordering the respondent, his agents, representatives and other persons acting in his behalf to cancel all existing Timber License Agreement (TLA) in the country and to cease and desist from receiving, accepting, processing, renewing or approving new TLAs.
Defendant, on the other hand, filed a motion to dismiss on the
ground that the complaint had no cause of action against him and that it raises a political question.
ISSUE:
Whether the issue raised by the plaintiffs is a political question
- one involving policy formulation or determination by the executive or legislative branches of government?
HELD:
No.
Policy formulation or determination by the executive or
legislative branches of Government is not squarely put in issue. What is principally involved is the enforcement of a right vis-a- vis policies already formulated and expressed in legislation. It must, nonetheless, be emphasized that the political question doctrine is no longer, the insurmountable obstacle to the exercise of judicial power or the impenetrable shield that protects executive and legislative actions from judicial inquiry or review. The second paragraph of section 1, Article VIII of the Constitution states that:
Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of
justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.