Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

Sample Risk List

Environmental Risks External Risks Design Risks Engineering Services Risks Right of Way Risks Construction Risks Project Management Risks Organizational Risks
Environmental analysis incomplete Landowners unwilling to sell Design incomplete Foundations utilizing Cast-In-Drilled-Hole or Utility relocation requires more time Inaccurate contract time estimates Project purpose and need is not well- Inexperienced staff assigned
Cast-In-Steel-Shell pile 30 in diameter or than planned defined
greater may require tunneling and mining
provisions within the contract documents and
early notification of Cal-OSHA
Availability of project data and mapping Local communities pose objections Unexpected geotechnical or Bridges constructed at grade and then Unforeseen railroad involvement Permit work window time is Project scope definition is incomplete Losing critical staff at crucial point of
at the beginning of the environmental groundwater issues excavated underneath may require tunneling insufficient the project
study is insufficient and mining provisions within the contract
documents and early notification of Cal-OSHA
New information after Environmental Unreasonably high expectations from Inaccurate assumptions on technical Hazardous materials in existing structure or Resolving objections to Right of Way Change requests due to differing site Project scope, schedule, objectives, Insufficient time to plan
Document is completed may require re- stakeholders issues in planning stage appraisal takes more time and/or conditions cost, and deliverables are not clearly
evaluation or a new document (i.e. utility surrounding soil; lead paint, money defined or understood
relocation beyond document coverage) contaminated soil, asbestos pipe, asbestos
bearings and shims
New alternatives required to avoid, Political factors or support for project Surveys incomplete Piles driven into fish habitat may require special Right of Way datasheet incomplete Temporary excavation and shoring No control over staff priorities Unanticipated project manager
mitigate or minimize impact changes noise attenuation to protect marine species or underestimated system design is not adequate workload

Acquisition, creation or restoration of on Stakeholders request late changes Changes to Special railroad requirements are necessary Need for Permits to Enter not Falsework design is not adequate Consultant or contractor delays Internal red tape causes delay
or off-site mitigation materials/geotechnical/foundation including an extensive geotechnical report for considered in project schedule getting approvals, decisions
temporary shoring system adjacent to tracks development
Environmental clearance for staging or New stakeholders emerge and Bridge site data incomplete to DES Access to adjacent properties is necessary to Condemnation process takes longer Unidentified utilities Estimating and/or scheduling errors Functional units not available,
borrow sites required request changes resolve constructability requirements than anticipated overloaded
Historic site, endangered species, Threat of lawsuits Hazardous waste site analysis Existing structures planned for modification not Acquisition of parcels controlled by a Buried man-made Unplanned work that must be Lack of understanding of complex
riparian areas, wetlands and/or public incomplete evaluated for seismic retrofit, scour potential and State or Federal Agency may take objects/unidentified hazardous waste accommodated internal funding procedures
park present structural capacity longer than anticipated
Design changes require additional Increase in material cost due to Unforeseen design exceptions Foundation and geotechnical tasks (foundation Discovery of hazardous waste in the Dewatering is required due to Lack of coordination/communication Priorities change on existing program
Environmental analysis market forces required drilling and material testing) not identified and right of way phase change in water table
included in project workplan
Unforeseen formal NEPA/404 Water quality regulations change Consultant design not up to Bridge is a habitat to bats or other species Seasonal requirements during utility Temporary construction easements Underestimated support resources or Inconsistent cost, time, scope and
consultation is required Department standards requiring mitigation or seasonal construction relocation expire overly optimistic delivery schedule quality objectives
Unforeseen formal Section 7 New permits or additional information Unresolved constructability items Condition of the bridge deck unknown Utility company workload, financial Electrical power lines not seen and in Scope creep Overlapping of one or more project
consultation is required required condition or timeline conflict with construction limits, scope of work or schedule
Unexpected Section 106 issues Reviewing agency requires longer Complex hydraulic features For projects involving bridge removal, bridge Expired temporary construction Street or ramp closures not Unresolved project conflicts not Funding changes for fiscal year
expected than expected review time carries traffic during staging easements coordinated with local community escalated in a timely manner
Unexpected Native American concerns Changes to storm-water Unable to meet Americans with Verify that all seasonal constraints and Inadequate pool of expert witnesses Insufficient or limited construction or Unanticipated escalation in right of way Lack of specialized staff (biology,
requirements Disabilities Act requirements permitting requirements are identified and or qualified appraisers staging areas values or construction cost anthropology, geotechnical,
incorporated in the project schedule archeology, etc.)
Unforeseen Section 4(f) resources Permits or agency actions delayed or Project in a critical water shortage Complex structures hydraulic design requiring Changes during construction require Delay in earlier project phases Capital funding unavailable for right
affected take longer than expected area and a water source agreement investigation and planning additional coordination with resource jeopardizes ability to meet programmed of way or construction
required agencies delivery commitment
Project may encroach into the Coastal New information required for permits Incomplete quantity estimates Assumptions upon which the Advance Planning Late discovery of aerially deposited Added workload or time requirements
Zone Study is based on are realistic and verification of lead because of new direction, policy, or
these assumptions prior to completion of the statute
Project Report
Project may encroach onto a Scenic Environmental regulations change Unforeseen construction window Design changes to alignment, profile, typical Experimental or research features Local agency support not attained
Highway and/or rainy season requirements cross section, stage construction between incorporated
Advance Planning Study and the Bridge Site
Submittal
Project may encroach to a Wild and Controversy on environmental New or revised design standard Unexpected environmental constraints that Unexpected paleontology findings Public awareness/campaign not planned
Scenic River grounds expected impact bridge construction
Unanticipated noise impacts Pressure to deliver project on an Unforeseen aesthetic requirements Delay in demolition due to sensitive Unforeseen agreements required
accelerated schedule habitat requirements or other
reasons
Project causes an unanticipated barrier Labor shortage or strike Delay due to permits or agreements, from Long lead time for utilities caused by Priorities change on existing program
to wildlife Federal, State, or local agencies for design and manufacture of special
geotechnical subsurface exploration components (steel towers or special
pipe)
Project may encroach into a floodplain or Construction or pile driving noise and Delay due to Right-of-Entry agreements for Inconsistent cost, time, scope, and
a regulatory floodway vibration impacting adjacent geotechnical subsurface exploration quality objectives
businesses or residents
Project does not conform to the state Delay due to traffic management and lane
implementation plan for air quality at the closure for geotechnical subsurface exploration
program and plan level
Unanticipated cumulative impact issues

1/1 May 5, 2007

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen