0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
159 Ansichten2 Seiten
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise stimulates the production of endorphins in the brain which elevate mood and reduce stress levels.
Originalbeschreibung:
Doctrine of State Immunity Assigned Cases
Bachelor of Laws 1
Isabela State University
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise stimulates the production of endorphins in the brain which elevate mood and reduce stress levels.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise stimulates the production of endorphins in the brain which elevate mood and reduce stress levels.
Kawawanakoa v. Polybank, 205 U.S. 349 (1907) Philippine Agila Satellite v. Lichauco, G.R. No. 134887, July 27, 2006 Minucher v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 142396, February 11, 2003 GTZ v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 152318, April 16, 2009 Vigilar v. Aquino, G.R. No. 180388, January 18, 2011 Application Rallos v. City of Cebu, G.R. No. 202651, August 28, 2013 Basis U.S.A. vs. Reyes, March 1, 1993 Immunity of Foreign States & Diplomats Republic of Indonesia vs. Vinzon G.R. No. 154705 June 26, 2003 Principle of par in parem non habet imperium Process of Suggestion The Holy See v. RTC, GR 101949, Dec. 1, 1994 Determination of Immunity by the Department of Foreign Affairs Liang v. People, G.R. No. 125865, January 28, 2000 Immunity of International Organizations and Agencies SEAFDEC v. NLRC, 241 SCRA 580 Callado v. IRRI, 244 SCRA 210 DFA v. NLRC, Sept. 18, 1996 Immunity of Government Agencies Shell Philippines v. Jalos, GR No. 179918, September 8, 2010 Incorporated Municipal Corporations Municipality of San Fernando v. Judge Firme, 195 SCRA 692 Unincorporated If principal function is governmental Farolan v. CTA 217 SCRA 298 ATO v. Ramos, 644 SCRA 36 Madag Buisan, et al. Vs. Commission of Audit and Department of Public Works and Highways G.R. No. 212376. January 31, 2017 If proprietary suable China National Machinery vs. Sta Maria, G.R.No.185572, February 7, 2012 Suits against Public Officers City of Angeles v. CA, Aug. 28,1996 Veterans Manpower v. CA, 214 SCRA 286 Wylie v. Rarang, 209 SCRA 357 Lansang v. CA G.R. No. 102667February 23, 2000 Waiver of Immunity Arigo v. Swift, G.R. No. 206510, September 16, 2014 Consent to be sued Express Consent Republic v. Feliciano, 148 SCRA 424 NHA VS. HEIRS OF GUIVELONDO 404 SCRA 389 (2003) General Law CA 327; PD 1445; Art. 2180 New Civil Code MERRIT VS. GOVT 34 PHIL 311 (1916) MUNICIPALITY VS. JUDGE 195 SCRA 692 (1991) MUNICIPALITY OF HAGONOY VS.DUMDUM 616 SCRA 1 (2010) Act No. 3083 COMMISSIONER VS. SAN DIEGO 31 SCRA 616 (1970) Special Law Meritt v. Gov't. of the Phil. Islands, 34 Phil. 311 Implied Consent Republic v. Sandiganbayan G.R. No. 85384 Feb. 28, 1990 EPG CONSTRUCTION VS VIGILAR 354 SCRA 566 (2001) REPUBLIC VS. UNIMEX 518 SCRA 19 (2007) When State commences litigation Froilan v. Pan Oriental Shipping, Sept. 30, 1954 REPUBLIC VS. SANDIGANBAYAN 484 SCRA 119 (2006) When State enters into a business contract USA v. Ruiz, 136 SCRA 487 PTA VS. PGDEI 668 SCRA 406 Exemption from legal requirements Banahaw Broadcasting vs. Pacana, G.R. No. 171673, May 30, 2011 Landbank vs. Rivera, G.R. No. 182431, November 17, 2001 SM Land, Inc. v. Bases Conversion and Development Authority, G. R. No. 203655, March 18, 2015 SM Land, Inc. v. Bases Conversion and Development Authority, G.R. No. 203655, September 7, 2015 Suability not outright liability Meritt v. Gov't. of the Phil. Islands, 34 Phil. 311 Fontanilla v. Maliaman, 194 SCRA 486 Consent to be sued does not include consent to execution Republic v. Villasor, 54 SCRA 84 Municipality of San Miguel v. Fernandez, 130 SCRA 56 Municipality of Makati v. CA, 190 SCRA 206 City of Caloocan v. Allarde G.R. No. 107271 September 10, 2003 PROFESSIONAL VIDEO VS. TESDA 591 SCRA 83 (2009) DEPT. OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS VS. NLRC 262 SCRA 39 (1996) REPUBLIC VS. NLRC 263 SCRA 290 REPUBLIC VS. HIDALGO 477 SCRA 32 (2005) Immunity cannot be used to perpetrate an injustice on a citizen - Ministerio v. CFI of Cebu, 40 SCRA 464
Mugged at the Courthouse: An Analysis of the Decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims in Alaska V. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 685 (Ct. Cl.1996) and Subsequent Petition of Certiorari