Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I N N O V A T I V E L Y
Strategic Innovators
www.iipm.edu
Volume 2 Issue 2 September - November 2005
Entrepreneurship
& Private
Investors
STRATEGIC INNOVATORS
40 AT T R AC T I N G P R I VAT E I N V E S TO R S : F R A N K DEMML ER
AAN
N I II PI PMM I INNTTEELLLL II G
G EE N
NCCE
E UN
U N II T
T PP UUBBLLI ICCAATTI IOONN
S T R A T E G I C I S S U E S
D A R E T O D R E A M ; S T R AT E G I C A L LY ! I N N O V AT I V E LY !
Strategic Innovators
Publisher & Founder
Dr. M. K. Chaudhuri
Editor-in-Chief
Arindam Chaudhuri
Group Publisher
Abhimanyu Ghosh
Consulting Editors
Sutanu Guru, Prasoon S. Majumdar
Shubhoshekhar Bhattacharjee, Saurav Chatterjee
Naveen Chamoli, Arundhati Banerji
Jayanta Chakrabarti, Dipankar Sarkar
Contributing Editor
Prashanto Banerji
Associate Editor
(Management Intelligence Centre)
Smita Polite
Assistant Editor
(Management Intelligence Centre)
Virat Bahri
Copy Editor
Mridu Singh
Production
Ripudaman Kaushik, Gurudas M. Thakur
Rajesh Malik
Circulation
CHIEF MANAGER DISTRIBUTION:
Surbhi Pandit Nangia
GENERAL MANAGER CIRCULATION: Narendra Budhiraja
CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT: Bhupender Singh Bisht,
Kapil Kaushik, Rajeev Nayan Sinha,
Bhaskar Majumder, M. S. Dinakar, Nagoor, Ballal
Innovating India
I f there were a question on
what could be the most im-
portant strategic innovation In-
remained skewed and limited to
only few firms and industries.
It would not be cynical to state
dia could have hoped for, the that this growth cannot be sus-
answer, surprisingly though, tained if it is not scaled across
would lie at the conflux of the the length and breadth of this
corporate world and Indian so- country. And for all selfish rea-
ciety. Over the past ten years, sons if India Inc. needs to grow
IIPM’s research has shown how at current levels in future too,
Indian organizations have com- then it has to be an active agent
peted with panache with global for overall development.
leaders who have come to India and abroad, So it becomes a strategic imperative for
and amassed massive wealth, not only for the India Inc. that they on a continuous basis
their shareholders, but also for their manage- should engage themselves in various levels
ment in terms of free cash. of development. India, (by both default and
One simply cannot ignore companies design) already possesses the advantage of
like Wipro, Ranbaxy, Infosys, Bharat Forge being a young economy. And if this youth
and Dr. Reddy’s laboratories while talking is well educated and healthy, fired with an
about India Inc.’s success globally. Ranbaxy entrepreneurial spirit it can go a long way
hailed as the true Indian MNC today totally to give India and its companies an indubi-
survives on foreign markets. More than 80% table competitive advantage. But to create
of revenues for Ranbaxy come from abroad. this competitive advantage, perhaps today
Infosys the “global leader in IT and Business India Inc. is more competent and capable
consulting” with 98% of its revenue coming than ever before. Today it is equipped with
from outside India, is the perfect example all essential resources, but what it lacks is
of success of Indian companies abroad. Dr a collective and integrated initiative backed
Reddy’s laboratory is the first Pharmaceuti- by a broad based vision. Interventions are
cal Company to be listed in NYSE from Asia. required at micro-levels to create a reservoir
Bharat Forge, the 2nd largest forging company of educated, healthy and employable human
in the world and the largest Indian exporter of resource to offset any future growth impedi-
auto components is another glaring example ments. Without any further deliberation, the
of success of Indian companies on the global corporations of India should necessarily take
arena. This Indian corporate juggernaut is up the responsibility of ensuring that they give
almost untamable. back to India, what India has given to them.
Indians are a fortunate bunch; fortunate It won’t be long before rest of India joins in;
because they have been blessed with various but then, the first step is the toughest. And
governments since independence, that have that first step of private initiatives in this de-
more or less been thoroughly unsuccessful velopment process, unarguably, is the most
(deliberately though) in supporting any cor- critical strategic innovation India could hope
porate advancement or social development for, now more than ever!
through macro national economic initiatives;
again, fortunate because this deliberate absti-
nence of successive governments has forced,
India Inc. on one hand, to learn the tricks of
growth by itself, and on the other, Society
Unincorporated to fend for survival by itself.
But unfortunately, the growth patterns have
Content
Strategic
Issues 8
Welcome to
Google Economy
Google seeks to change
the status quo...
40 Corporate Social
Responsibility 26
Companies must adopt a
Frank Demmler -
Carnegie Mellon scientific approach in being a
Attracting Private responsible business while
Investors trying to be profitable
CASE STUDY 72
Strategic Planning for Georges Haour
a Turnaround 54 30 - IMD Lausanne
Resolving the In-
Unitech Systems has used an novation Paradox
innovative approach to strategic in Technology
planning as a vehicle of organisational Companies
development and change
78
Mohun Bagan Adrian Slywotzky
Athletic Club - An - Mercer
Consulting
Empire Under Seize 60 6 Principles
The rise and fall of the club: to Make Growth
a victim of the internal conflicts Initiatives Work
of the management team
87
What ails Bata India? 64
The one time leader of the
footwear industry is now trying David B. Yoffie
- Harvard Busi-
hard to keep up with tough ness School
competition from other players Judo Strategy
Welcome to the
Google Economy!!!
8 STRATEGIC INNOVATORS SEPTEMBER, 2005 An IIPM Intelligence Unit Publication
google
Google seeks to a valuable innovation in search engine the dotcom crash, Google steadily grew
technology known as page rank. The link in advertising revenues, and further de-
change the ‘I am feeling lucky’ connected the user to
the most frequently viewed web page for
veloped its search engine algorithms,
adding features like Google Image search,
status quo... the search words he keyed in.
Google continued to grow by acquiring
Google News and Google Catalogs search.
But Google faces tough competition from
clients like AOL, Virgilio and VirginNet. En- Microsoft and Yahoo, which have literally
by Virat Bahri, IIPM DELHI hancements continued unabated on search vowed to end Google’s domination of the
engine technology like Google directory, search engine space.
search via wireless and search engines Google went public in September, 2004
The Google story in different languages (a global perspec- and since then its share price has tripled.
Is it Bubbledotcom again? A company that tive). In May 2000, Google was awarded Revenues for Quarter 4 of 2004 reached a
was started by two students seven years the Webby Award and the People’s Voice staggering $1.032 billion, a rise of 101%
ago with initial capital investment of $1 Award for technical achievement. By 2000 over the previous year. For Quarter 1,
million has turned a Giant Killer. A lot has end, Google was handling around a 100 2005, Google’s net profits reached 369.2
been said about the dotcom bubble burst million search queries everyday. million, or $1.29 a share, from $64.0 mil-
and about how overvaluations ultimately In 2001, Eric Schmidt, head of Novell, lion last year, a 600% increase in profit.
lead to correction in the stock market. was appointed CEO of Google. The search The gross Revenue nearly was $1.26 billion
Three quarters of growth and Google mar- queries now touched 200 million and from $651.6 million in Quarter 1, 2004.
ket valuation touched just above 80 billion, Eric introduced the paid search advertis-
and its shares have tripled in value on the ing concept to Google. The system meant Too much growth burst the bubble
New York Stock Exchange, ever since it small text ads that did not irritate the user During dotcom boom time, Sun Microsys-
went public in September, 2004. In the and pay per click advertising, a boon for tems was traded at $64, or 10 times its
process, it achieved another distinction- advertisers since they now had to pay to annual revenues. Sun chief executive Scott
that of overtaking Times Warner (valued Google only when their link was clicked by McNealy’s analysis of the stupidity of his
at $78 billion) as the world’s most valued the Internet User. The technology - called own shareholders after the crash makes for
media company. Hey then, is it time to AdSense - works thus: Advertisers create an interesting read. In 2002, he said:
raise a toast to the dotcoms again?
History
The first strategy it employed
Google was started in September 1998
by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, graduates
was a valuable innovation
from the Stanford University. The objective
was to solve the major problem of comput-
known as page rank
ing - how to retrieve relevant information
from a huge reservoir of data; in short the their own advertisements, give keywords “At 10 times revenues, to give you a
search engine. Although it started in beta to Google that link to their product/service 10-year payback, I have to pay you 100%
version, it was answering around ten thou- and the advertiser pays when the subscriber of revenues for 10 straight years in divi-
sand search queries a day by the time the clicks on the link. This represented a major dends. That assumes I can get that by my
company was officially launched. By Febru- ‘thumbs up’ for Internet based firms over shareholders. That assumes I have zero
ary 1999, Google was answering around traditional media like radio and television cost of goods sold, which is very hard for
500000 queries a day and was fast moving where the advertiser has to pay a flat fee a computer company. That assumes zero
up as one of the top Internet companies irrespective of how many people listen to expenses, which is really hard with 39,000
of the world. or view their advertisement. employees. That assumes I pay no taxes,
By June 1999, Google had managed Adsense resulted in a rise in revenue, which is very hard. And that assumes you
to acquire a second round of funding and but invited trouble from Overture (later pay no taxes on your dividends, which is
boasted of an illustrious Board of Direc- taken over by Yahoo) which claimed that kind of illegal. And that assumes with zero
tors including Mike Moritz (Sequoia), John the technology behind Adsense was an R&D for the next 10 years, I can maintain
Doerr (Kleiner Perkins) and Ram Shriram, Overture innovation. Google finally made the current revenue run rate. Now, having
CEO of Junglee. In September 1999, the an out of court settlement by giving Yahoo done that, would any of you like to buy my
beta tag was removed. seven million shares, worth around $230 stock at $64? Do you realise how ridicu-
When Google started as a search en- million, to resolve the matter. lous those basic assumptions are? You don’t
gine, the first strategy it employed was One of the few companies to survive need any transparency. You don’t need any
“Larry page and I had a approved price. All those who bid above
the LBP have to end up paying the LBP.
fundamental philosophy when The catch is, all those who bid below LBP
get nothing. In their public auction, Google
we started google - the user reserved the right to increase the number
of shares, thereby reducing the leverage
The higher Google has gone, These were perhaps a few considera-
I
ndia has emerged as the preferred countries like China and Mexico, India’s $1.2 billion. During 2003, India earned an
destination for business process out- BPO is losing its competitive advantage, estimated $2.3 billion, representing more
sourcing (BPO). In the outsourcing and at present is plagued with high at- than 80% of the global market. According
world, it is hailed as “the back office trition, poor infrastructure, price wars, to Gartner, offshore BPO spending is pro-
of the world.” The importance of outsourc- regulatory tangles and increasing com- jected to grow to $24.2 billion by 2007, of
ing can be judged by the fact that it became moditisation of services. which India will account for $13.8 billion,
an election issue in the US elections. A recent report of Gartner, the interna- i.e., 57%. It is clear from the above that
Business process outsourcing strate- tional research firm, predicts that India is while India’s offshore BPO earnings are set
gically refers to outsourcing of non-core likely to lose its market share in offshore to grow in absolute terms, its market share
activities of a firm. When this outsourcing BPO from the present 80% to 55% by 2007. will drop considerably from the position it
moves to a third party servicing company Gartner’s forecast is supported by The As- presently enjoys.
beyond the home country’s shores, such sociated Chambers of Commerce and In-
a third party is called an “Offshore BPO.” dustry of India (ASSOCHAM) which also Raison d’être
India holds around 80% market share glo- states that India’s dominance in offshore Has India lost its cost competitiveness and
bally of this offshore market. According BPO might be short-lived. Currently, much availability of skilled labor? Or does it not
to International Data Corporation (IDC) of the offshore work comes from the US. have sufficient infrastructure? The main
estimates, the BPO boom is expected to With other countries also trying to offshore reason for this downward shift is not that
be as big as $1 trillion by 2006. India has their work, the pie will get bigger in the India is losing out, but other countries are
been a dominant player in the offshore BPO future. In 2002, offshore-BPO spending was realising their potential as attractive desti-
market. But amidst tight competition from $1.8 billion, of which India accounted for nations and are working towards making
Is
India losing
its competitive edge in
Outsourcing?
it even better. Of late, other nations such Moving ahead, India could lose out due is set to rise in the future. When this hap-
as Indonesia, Ireland, Philippines, Mexico, to its single-minded focus on the English pens on a large-scale, it could prove to be
Ghana, South Africa, Malaysia, Mauritius, language. India does not have sufficient a hindrance for Indian companies. Other
Thailand and China have realised the poten- people who speak non-English foreign lan- nations with foreign language skills will be
tial of this sector in job creation and revenue guages such as Spanish, French and Ger- able to take away specific businesses relat-
generation and are gearing up to compete man. The cost of procuring language spe- ing to this multi-language area. Indian BPO
for their own share in the market. These cialist manpower is extravagant. With the companies, such as ICICI OneSource, iGate
countries are working on several fronts such offshore BPO work growing globally, and Global Solutions, Progeon, Technovate and
as upgrading their language (English) skills UK and the European countries offshoring others offer some services in French, Ger-
and infrastructure facilities, so as to com- their work, the share of non-English work man, Spanish, Japanese, and Italian, but
pete better. China already on a very miniscule scale.
has an upper hand in The cost advantage was
providing infrastructure
when compared to India.
BPO skyscraper the biggest USP for companies
shifting business to India, but
80
Mexico and Canada are that advantage is fast getting
preferred destinations be- eroded. India, being a fore-
60
cause of their geographi- runner in the business, has
cal and cultural proximity matured over time, and this
40
to the US. Countries like maturity has also unfortunate-
the Philippines, Mexico, ly led to increase in pricing by
20
and Canada also have a various players. The difference
sizeable number of Eng- in the demand-supply gap is
0
lish speaking people, 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05* 2005-06* the reason behind this. In ad-
thereby removing the *Projected Source: www.nasscom.org dition, the sheer proliferation of
language barrier. companies in this business has
that Bahree allegedly sold sensi- of reducing costs will fail. In short, consoli-
Currently, the unregulated tive confidential information for dation will become the survival mantra in
money – prospective and current the BPO space. In the venture capitalist
growth of the industry is offshoring clients are becoming backed BPOs, promoters are opting for
doubly careful about process mi- buyout as an exit route due to their in-
resulting in a strain on the gration and maintenance. With ability to scale up operations according to
NASSCOM concerned with very the customer’s requirement and offsetting
available infrastructure broad information technology of their margins due to lowering of billing
related areas, India still doesn’t rates and increasing costs. Most BPO serv-
and resources have an organized form of any ice providers have entered into the BPO
regulatory body to look after the space to exploit the growth opportunity,
created a severe resource constraint. All BPO and ITES industry; so concerns like but many of them lack funds for scaling up
these factors could be leveraged by other security of data, quality of the work done and sustainable clients. Many providers,
countries to successfully take away a por- and other concerns regarding cost and bar- who lack economies of scale, are trying
tion of the offshore BPO pie. Indian BPO gaining are becoming louder by the day. to differentiate their services, but are fac-
players have the exigent task of managing However, in reality the number of such ing difficulty on the price and competence
growth. Currently, the unregulated growth security breaches is less than a handful. front. The best way that some of the players
of the industry is resulting in a strain on the Yet because offshoring to India has become could add value in the future is to optimize
available infrastructure and resources. The a controversial issue for many countries, their current operations and sell themselves
industry is quite aware of the problem and such concerns have been magnified dis- to a consolidator or become consolidators
has been urging state governments to take proportionately. themselves. As this market matures, there
action, but without much success. will be a shakeout and weak players will
Another major problem in the Indian Survival strategies cease to exist.
BPO market is maintaining and attracting
the best talent in the industry. The attri- Consolidation Developing a Global Delivery
tion rate in the BPO sector is said to be Gartner has predicted that by the end of Model (GDM)
around 20 to 40 percent. So, constantly 2005, 70% of the top 15 Indian-owned BPO A GDM will help the service provider to
training and attracting the best employees start-ups that offer customer call center branch out to multiple global locations to
in the industry also adds to the employer services will be acquired, merged or be manage geographical differences in cost,
cost. A report by the National Association marginalized. And its prediction is that by quality and skill sets. It consists of both
of Software and Service Companies (NASS- 2007, 80% of voice-based customer service offshore and onsite models (that is, units
COM), India’s leading information technol- and support centers with the primary goal that are closer to the customers home coun-
ogy industry association, says tries). Technically, near-shore
that the outsourcing industry models undertake high-end
is expected to face a shortage
of 262,000 professionals by
Key mid tier M&A deals work and offshore models un-
dertake high volume and lower
2012. Given this background DATE ACQUIRER, TARGET, DEAL SIZE end of the process or project.
and the challenge faced, one Implementation of such models
is forced to question if India is Aug 2003 iGate, Quintant, $19mn will help in maximising quality,
losing its USP. i-flex, Supersolutions, $11.5mn while leveraging low-cost and
Dec 2003
One other reason for pro- expertise. These differentiated,
spective client companies to Apr 2004 Mphasis, Kshema Tech, $21mn yet in tandem, delivery models
think beyond India is that there will also help in optimising skill
is now concern for the secu- Jun 2004 Flextronics, Hughes Software, $226 mn set availability, cost advantages
rity of first-party information Patni, Cymbal Tech, $68 mn and retaining of clients. BPOs are
Oct 2004
and data. Due to recent cases developing global delivery mod-
– like the one in Bangalore Nov 2004 i-flex, equinox, N.A. els to keep pace with demand
where two of the employees of and mitigate the risks. They are
a reputed outsourcing Indian Feb 2004 Mphasis, Princeton Consulting, $14 mn trying to diversify systematic risk
company wrongly used end that is associated with sourcing
Mar 2005 Mphasis, El Dorado, $16.5 mn
clients’ data to misappropri- from (or servicing in) a single
ate large amounts of money, May 2005 MindTree, Lino Software, $10.12 mn country. These reasons range
or the Karan Bahree case where from geopolitical risks to lan-
a British newspaper claimed guage issues, currency fluctua-
tions to specific political environments, and personnel. The government still needs to panies want to retain their business. BPO
many others. However, companies will still address the issue of supply of trained per- players seem to understand this only too
have to face several challenges. The most sonnel for BPO. However, the private sec- well and have already started on the path
important of these issues would be clash tor, seeing an opportunity in training peo- of joining hands.
of company cultures and practices due to ple in BPO, is developing various courses Another area where India needs to con-
multi-country backgrounds. that meet the industry’s needs. Experts feel sciously focus on is moving up the value
that the future work will involve more of chain. India needs to develop its strategy
Outlook high-end analytical processes such as bank- to continuously innovate and add value
What we have seen so far in the BPO sector ing, insurance, healthcare and marketing to processes and provide an end-to-end
is only the tip of the iceberg. India, in order applications. The scale of operations is solution to global clients. Delivering high
to retain its dominant position in the BPO yet another issue. The Indian BPO market quality and value-added work will help
sector, needs to draw up a long-term plan. populated with numerous small and large move up the value chain, thereby build-
Experts feel that the plan should be able players, who enjoy economies of scale, are ing value differentiators. This is to say that
to tackle issues regarding infrastructure, few and far between. Consolidation in the companies should build new competencies
data protection laws and providing trained industry is the need of the hour if the com- and competitive advantages, as cost com-
petitiveness alone will no longer attract
clients to Indian shores. Data analytics (as
Business process outsourcing industry undertaken by companies like Fair Isaac
and other captive outsourcing units like
outlook: A.T. Kearney GECIS and American Express centers in
India) is one particular area that has value
The following are some key findings from the study of Indian IT chain enthusiasts clamouring up.
services market dynamics and the forecast through 2008: Despite increasing labor costs, service
quality problems and competition from
• During 2003, IT services witnessed a growth rate of 15% over 2002, new geographies, India seems to be the
to $1.66 billion. The market is forecasted to grow at a compound number one choice for at least the medium-
annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.4 % through 2008, to $3.7 billion. term, mainly due to the English language
advantage. There are many other locations
• Development and Integration (D&I) services revenue accounted for that are poised to compete with India, such
the largest share of the total Indian IT services market, 57%, growing as China, Mexico, Ghana, the Caribbean
at a CAGR of 16.4% from 2003 through 2008. Islands, South Africa, Philippines, Malay-
sia, Mauritius and Thailand; apart from
• Consulting services revenue saw a small decline of $2 million in Australia that has traditionally been a base
2003 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 16.2% through 2008.
for many American and European compa-
nies’ offshoring units. These countries have
• Process management and IT management services are expected
realized the potential of outsourcing and
to grow at CAGRs of 17.4% and 21.9%, respectively, with a growing
are aggressively promoting themselves as
focus on core competence while outsourcing areas of less expertise.
attractive BPO destinations by strength-
Service offerings are also expected to mature rapidly over this period,
leading to more outsourcing. ening their infrastructure and enhancing
their skills, mainly the English language.
• The banking, financial services and insurance sectors, and the tele- In such a situation, India cannot sit back
com sector have been leaders in deploying IT in their operations. and assume that everything will always be
While these sectors will continue to remain large spenders, govern- hunky-dory for the coming years. Indian
ment spending on deploying IT is on the rise and also represents companies need to constantly innovate
an attractive market. Enterprises in other sectors, such as manufac- to provide value to customers. To stay
turing, services and utilities, are also increasing their IT spending ahead of the others, ensuring differentia-
and are becoming attractive to service providers. tion through process expertise, end-to-end
capability, global delivery, better security
• 2004 marks the onset of rapid growth in the IT market. Posi- and privacy of information and service ex-
tive growth drivers are expectations of stable economic growth, cellence will be critical for the industry. But
increased global competitive pressures on local industry, improving the BPO industry in the long-term will see
infrastructure and growing investments in setting up offshore IT and a hybrid outsourcing model (onsite, near
business process outsourcing (BPO) facilities in India. shore, offshore) growing in popularity as
the industry matures.
Repositioning o
H
After years of dancing industan Lever Limited (HLL), the doyen of FMCG Industry in India, had
embarked on a bold initiative this summer – they were involved in the
under waterfalls, the Liril process of radically overhauling and repositioning their three major brands
– Lux, Fair & Lovely and Liril. First off the block was Liril. The latest ava-
girl has moved along with
tar of Liril soap comes with a new feminine shape, and a complete new look with eye
the soap into the catching translucent green bits in a light green base. The new Liril promises to give
consumers a completely new brand experience. The lime variant has been enriched
bedroom. by adding aloe-vera, which makes the skin soft and supple. The packaging of Liril has
also undergone radical transformation. The new carton box has a “love note game and
Will this new strategy quiz” on its back which invites people to share the same with their spouse. There is
also a host of promotional activities around the brand coming up that will go beyond
work for the brand?
the conventional touch points.
by Jayanta Chakraborti, The theme of the advertisement to promote the new Liril variant is also quite fresh
and much bolder. The now famous Liril Girl, the waterfall and the iconic jingle has been
IIPM PUNE
done away with – as the brand moves from a public venue to a private one – straight
into the bedroom. The new Liril Soft Aloe-Vera and Lemon television commercial fo-
cuses on naughty intimacies among married couples instead of the erstwhile iconic
“waterfall” campaigns.
The new commercial, created by advertising agency Lowe, attempts to inspire peo-
ple not to lose the magic in their marriage, especially in the midst of stressful lives
led by today’s couples. It shows the consumers how playful love and intimacy can be
discovered in the simplest of the moments. To justify the repositioning exercise, HLL
opined that there has been an evident transformation among housewives. They are
in full control of themselves, yet are stress prone and seek intimate moments in their
routine activities.
of Liril Soap
share. The soap’s parent company, HLL, And there are equal numbers of glaring ex- all male soap category started shrinking
has also been under a lot of pressure in amples where repositioning exercises lead and women emerged as the key decision
recent times from local players like Nirma to huge blunders. Some of the brands that makers. A new strategy was devised for
and Cavinkare, as well as from big giants went through successful repositioning ex- Cinthol, and the soap was first repositioned
like P&G. Both the bottom line and top line ercises were Dettol, Cinthol, Cadbury Dairy as a family brand with the “Tan Taaza Man
have flattened, as HLL went for frantic re- Milk chocolates, Horlicks and Saffola. Taaza” campaign. Later, women consumers
structuring exercises by selling off or shunt- Dettol Soap was not a winner when were targeted with a re-launch campaign
ing out non-profitable brands and focusing it was first launched. This was because in 2001. Recently, Cinthol Skin Fresh has
their effort on 30 power brands. Reckitt Benckiser launched Dettol soap been launched with orange extracts, there-
on a premium platform, which was way by extending the value proposition from
HLL Brands Market Share off the brand’s core properties of hygiene just freshness to fresh and natural.
Lifebuoy 17.5% and cleanliness. As soon as the product Cadbury Dairy Milk tasted major suc-
Lux 15.0% bombed, it was quickly re-launched by cess with their repositioning exercise. In
Reckitt the following year as a “100 per- the 1980s, it was positioned as “the perfect
Breeze 6.8%
cent germ fighter.” The changed position- expression of love”, captured in the memo-
Hamam 3.8%
ing has worked so well for it that Dettol rable copy: “Sometimes Cadbury can say
Liril 2.5% soap commands a share of 11 percent in it better than words.” In 1994 came the
Source: AC Nielsen Survey-2004 the premium soap market today. path-breaking “Real taste of life” campaign,
Another brand that went through a suc- which created a remarkable change in the
How effective is a repositioning effort cessful repositioning exercise – or rather way chocolates were perceived.
in lifting a sinking brand? Worldwide, as a sex-change – was Cinthol. This soap ac- The brand which had progressively
well as in India, there have been a lot of cidentally got positioned as a male soap become trapped as a gift for children was
repositioning exercises that have rescued due to its masculine brand ambassadors unshackled and repositioned to the “free
brands from precarious situations and Imran Khan, Vinod Khanna and Akshaye child” in every adult.
heaped rewards for the parent company. Khanna. Making matters worse, the over- Cadbury Dairy Milk was redefined as
Professionalising
Strategic
Management
H
ow do you recognise a “pro- professional practice, and some possible ferent factors in their field. Often, this
fession”? What characterises benefits from addressing those shortcom- relies on underlying science; i.e. a fun-
the delivery of its professional ings. Professions can point to a number damental explanation of “what causes
services that lets you know you of features to give confidence that their what and why”, such as the physics of
are in safe hands? How do you know that a practitioners know what they are doing materials science. Not all professions
doctor is diagnosing your complaint accu- and will recommend and carry out sound share a scientific base, however. Some
rately, and prescribing the right treatment? courses of action: rely instead on a cumulative knowledge
How can you be confident that an engineer • Standard terms. When one doctor base of what works in practice, such as
has designed a bridge reliably? How can uses the term “hypertension”, any double-entry bookkeeping.
you be sure that your accountant has pre- other doctor knows exactly what they • Incremental insight. Where there are
pared accurate accounts for your business? mean. Any two engineers know what variances around a norm, specialists do
Unless you happen to be one of these pro- “stress” means, and accountants share not readily throw away the core rela-
fessionals, you will have little capacity to a common understanding of terms like tionships on which they rely. Instead,
check out their advice for yourself. “debtors”. There may be nuances of de- they assume that there must be addi-
Since all kinds of organisations have tail, but the central concept is widely tional factors at play, and seek to add
such profound influence on our lives, it understood. Professionals also have a that knowledge to their understanding.
may be worth asking - to what extent those shared understanding of what defines Only rarely, when fundamental models
who practise and advise on strategic man- “good” performance - blood pressure get badly out of line with observations,
agement can provide us with similar levels within healthy limits, bridges that carry do professions throw out old methods
of confidence. This article first considers likely loads without falling over and and start again.
some answers to the question above and businesses that are solvent. • Standard procedures. Given a sound
then assesses the extent to which “strategy” • Well-established relationships. Profes- body of well-established relationships
meets these answers. Finally, it considers sions build on a body of understanding between commonly defined factors,
the implications of any shortcomings in about the relationships between dif- professions develop procedures that
and understanding embedded in these given better tools for the job of developing
relationships, procedures and solutions, and delivering strategy.
professions generally require substantial When professions lack the essential fea-
education and training before practi- tures listed above, their clients are vulner-
tioners are let loose on the unsuspecting able to charlatans and quacks, pedalling
public. There are often examinations snake oil in place of proven solutions. Are
of increasing difficulty, signalling that we then in this situation in strategy? We
a professional has shown himself com- know that there is minimal usage of for-
petent to tackle situations of a certain mal tools for building strategies or mak-
complexity, but no more. ing strategic decisions. We also know that
Good practice in these and other pro- organisations “follow the herd”, pursuing
fessions is highly beneficial. We get great with half-blind faith the strategies of ad-
bridges from skilled engineers, wonderful mired peers.
health recovery from skilled doctors, and Leaders are encouraged in these ill-ad-
peace of mind from skilled accounting for vised behaviours by advisers with a vested
our businesses. Conversely, poor practice interest in pushing them into action. Equity
is definitely exceedingly dangerous, and analysts and traders would have little to
we will not tolerate the risk to life, health do if companies simply pursued consistent
or financial well-being that results from strategies that worked, rather than sought
unprofessional behaviour. constantly to change in pursuit of earn-
Most strategic initiatives taken by most ings targets that can only be achieved by
organisations carry a very high risk of fail- damaging the business. Consultants urge
ure. Let’s first distinguish the strategic as- management to throw out sound strate-
pects of management from others, such as gies in place of transformations that are
leadership or general management. Whilst costly and damaging or to reorganise so fre-
these other components are of course vital, quently that few of their people know what
they can be separated from the design, ad- they are supposed to be doing. Investment
aptation and policy-making that constitute banks constantly pester management with
work reliably. Any two doctors will go strategic management of an enterprise. investments and acquisitions that will most
through similar procedures to find out It has been extensively argued, nota- likely deliver value only to the target com-
what ails you, and any two accountants bly by Professor Henry pany’s shareholders
will do pretty much the same tasks to
prepare your year-end accounts.
Mintzberg and his fol-
lowers that deliberate Most strategic and to the advisers
themselves.
• Proven solutions. Since they know what
causes what and why, and follow re-
strategic management
is neither necessary
initiatives carry The price of this
relying on gifted
liable procedures to discover what is
going on in any situation, professionals
nor feasible. Strategy
instead is said to be
a very high risk amateurs, advised
by vested inter-
can have confidence in the outcomes crafted, much as a pot- of failure ests, is huge. Most
from deliberate changes they make. ter or sculptor feels the strategic initiatives
Accountants can be rather sure of the emerging form of their taken by most or-
impact of reducing outstanding debtors work. It is also widely argued that a sense ganisations carry a very high risk of failure,
by a certain fraction. Engineers know of purpose is far more important than strat- whether starting a new venture, developing
the consequences of increasing the egy (tell that to the employees of Enron a new market, or making an acquisition.
cable-size in a bridge. Doctors know or Marconi!). These failures destroy wealth on a truly
how changes in diet, exercise or taking These views, however, mistake how stupendous scale -the cost of the late-1990s
certain drugs will affect a patient. The strategic management is practised, from technology bubble is well documented, but
more complex the situation, of course, how it could or should be practised. Then there are many more examples, from the
the less they can be absolutely certain there is little evidence that amateurs who endemic value destruction of the global
of the consequences of their interven- make things up as they go along make airline and car industries to the tribulations
tions, but they at least start from what better strategic decisions than those who of specific firms, such as Marks & Spencer,
is usually effective. try to work out details and what might be Vivendi or AOL Time Warner.
• Standards of practice and training. Giv- best before acting. Furthermore, we can not There is also a great human cost from
en the often large body of knowledge know how well smart people might do if this failure, with careers and livelihoods
A particular problem with the present on offer at the airport bookstands. human resource management, so why are
situation is that strategy and corporate de- The potential beneficiaries include oth- there so few in strategy?
velopment are so undervalued that very er important groups, too. We have already Against this army of winners, of course,
few people even try to make a career out mentioned the value destruction caused by there will undoubtedly be losers. The in-
of it. A “proper” senior management career bad strategy - the fixing of which no doubt cumbents - weaker consultants, leadership
most often has to develop from a strong would be of interest to investors. Pensions personalities, even we academics - have a
background in line management, finance or throughout the developed economies were strong incentive to reject any suggestion that
marketing - a powerful explanation for the devastated by the bursting of the late-1990s strategy is a trainable skill. It is far better for
woefully poor strategic management that is bubble - an episode that should have never these groups that it retains its mysticism, so
practised in all kinds of organisations. happened, at least on the scale that it did. that they can continue to promulgate new
Companies and other organisations (And which need not have happened, as fashions and sustain the constant activity
should also gain from much better advice, the expertise of Berkshire Hathaway and that results from each new fad. We might,
whether provided by in-house advisors or other investors makes clear). though, just have a window of opportunity
independent professionals. Clarifying ex- Employees, too, would be happy to ex- right now to puncture this myth.
actly what a professional analysis might change anxiety, confusion and insecurity Publishers are having trouble finding
look like in various situations would pro- for the confidence buyers for their
vide a reference against which to judge that their leaders Royal Dutch Shell is known to regu- numerous books
any new piece of work or advice. Many know what they larly undertake ‘What-If’ scenario on heroic leaders.
managers come across strategically impor- are doing, rather planning (rather than any manage- Investors are flex-
tant issues so rarely that they never have than relying on in- ment model) that involves develop- ing their muscles
an opportunity to learn what to expect. spiration alone. It ing multi-probability scenarios for to demand that
Consequently, they can be impressed by is an indictment of possible future industry situations management jus-
hyped-up stories and fancy phrases, una- the field that staff -(Editor’s note) tify their strategies.
ware that there is little substance behind surveys consistent- Moreover busi-
the recommendations. ly get low scores on nesses themselves
Senior management would benefit from the question “How confident are you in are also questioning the advice they risk
becoming more discriminating in their the direction your business is taking?” It receiving when they pay huge fees to con-
reading and interpretation of business is axiomatic that a strategy is much more sultants and investment banks. This could
information in books and articles. A bet- likely to be successful if the people in- be the right time to strike as the manage-
ter-informed community of professionals volved know how it is supposed to work ments perhaps feel sufficiently confident to
would perhaps have less patience with the and what their place is in its delivery. call out loud “Enough!”, and demand that
soap-opera stories and glib journalism that Introductory texts for non-professionals their advisors and specialists demonstrate
has taken over the magazines and books are available in finance, marketing and some degree of professionalism.
Corporate Social
Responsibility:
Science or Religion?
W
hen I was at the 2nd collo- ganisations should be doing it.” And in this Figure 1:
quium of the European Acad- manner, CSR can be a strategy to increase
The Easy Choice of CSR
emy of Business in Society, I
competitiveness. But how can we analyse
heard Professor Michael Por-this message in scientific terms?
ter say that the field of corporate social A foundational scientific
responsibility (CSR) has become a religion approach to manage- Being
filled with priests. Because of my researchment sciences is the Being more responsible
in decision sciences about the trade off be-
theory of rationality. competitive
tween economic values and ethical values, IIn this approach, we Being less
view myself as a scientist. Hence, I wonderstart from an actor, a competitive Being
not responsible
whether I am one of the priests Michael company or a manag-
Porter is talking about and whether this er, who chooses between
is compatible with my scientific status. two possible behaviours. In
Hence, the title of this talk. the present case, the actor can either
be socially responsible, or not be socially when competitiveness becomes an end in
The point of Michael Porter is that it is
not clear why companies should be socially responsible. Because the actor is assumed itself. You end up prescribing others not
responsible. Exhorting companies to be re- to be rational, he anticipates the conse- to be responsible. It may become the end
sponsible by saying “it is the right thing to
quences of his actions. He evaluates them for us: But at what price for society and
do” or “it feels good” is, according to him,
with respect to his objectives, if possible for our environment do companies pursue
like religion; and ‘exhorting’ is neither aquantitatively. In the present case, the ac- competitiveness?
convincing nor a satisfactory argument. tor can either increase its competitiveness, As demonstrated by the social and envi-
Hence, as per Porter, CSR would be or decrease its competitiveness. We have ronmental state of the world, this price too
“right now, all a defensive effort, a PR been told that a business should be socially high. It is not sustainable. If we continue
game in which companies primarily react to responsible when it increases its competi- like this, a few competitive companies may
deal with the critics and the pressure fromtiveness. This is to say that between being be the sole survivors of a world deprived of
activists.” To make his point clear, Michael
responsible and more competitive on the social and environmental resources. And
Porter asks, “Have you noticed how ‘sensi- one hand, and not being responsible and this is not a subversive statement. I know
tive’ industries like the petrochemical andless competitive on the other hand, the ac- it may not be pleasant. I know it may be
pharmaceutical industries tend to give tor should choose the former. difficult. But please, look around you.
more than ‘non-sensitive’ industries? They As Jacques Chirac said a year ago in
need permits; they are under pressure, so Big deal! Johannesburg: “Notre maison brûle et nous
they react.” He further warns that this is a
There is something more substantial in regardons ailleurs.” Like many politicians,
dangerous route of practising CSR. what Michael Porter says. Indeed, the most many businesses tend to look away. For
Finally, Porter concludes, “business interesting case is when the actor has to businesses, like for everyone, responsibility
should be proud of what it is doing”. It choose between being responsible and less is a moral obligation. Responsibility is not
needs to engage in “proactive integration competitive on the one hand, and not being something we can choose to do at the end
responsible and more competitive on the of the day if and only if it pays. Responsibil-
of social initiatives into business competi-
tive strategy… Today’s companies ought other hand (Figure 2). ity is something that, in everyday business,
to invest in corporate social responsibility As far as I understand, Michael Por- we always have.
as part of their business strategy to be- ter would prescribe businesses to remain Social and environmental responsibility
come more competitive.” And when this competitive in the face of such ethical of business goes hand in hand with its lead-
“corporate philanthropy is not related to dilemmas. In these cases, he would per- ing power in this global world. And don’t tell
businesses, competitiveness and skills, haps prescribe business not to be socially us that social responsibility is only a matter
then governments and philanthropic or- responsible. This shows what happens of political regulation: don’t we know how
businesses can spend so much effort and
money on influencing political regulation?
Tobacco companies are known for their phenomenal spending when The “game within the rules” has become “a
it comes to promotion. Companies like Phillip Morris squander mil- game for no rules” where legal and political
lions of dollars just for showing their brands of cigarettes in movies, regulation, if not democracy, are pushed to
overlooking the fact that people smoke these brands that are heavily the minimum in order to serve economic
advertised. On the other hand players like British American Tobacco interests. If businesses fail to assume their
Co. have done significant work in the area of social development by social and environmental responsibilities,
eliminating child labour in tobacco industries. (Editor’s note) they should take responsibility for the
destruction of society and of the environ-
Country Analysis a two-by-two matrix for business respon- In the absence of a dilemma, a busi-
Figure 2: sibility. In this matrix, we can be respon- ness naturally acts responsibly and profit-
sible towards society and the environment ably. In French, we say “joindre l’utile à
The Tough Choice of CSR
and be profitable without being l’agréable”. This is the easy case and it is
responsible, be respon- true we could better identify these win-win
Being sible without be- opportunities. Michael Porter gives many
responsible Being less ing profitable and such examples. When in a business ethi-
competitive
finally be irrespon- cal dilemma, rational business actors have
Being more sible without being the responsibility to choose between social
Being competitive
not responsible profitable (Figure and environmental irresponsibility and eco-
4). nomic sacrifice. This is the tough choice.
What is the rational In the face of business ethical dilemmas, a
thing to do? Pragmatic dis- business should ask itself whether the gain
ment. Basically, courses answer with the upper part of is worth the lack of responsibility. It should
we cannot evade responsibility. the matrix only. Pragmatics argue that the also ask itself whether it could stand the
When we have power, it obliges us. sole social responsibility of business is to consequences of the sacrifice.
When we have the choice, not being re- increase profits. Rationality is reduced to In the face of business ethical dilem-
sponsible is being irresponsible. Does this profit maximisation: only profit matters. On mas, business actors should enlarge the
mean we should preach for responsibility? the other hand, idealist discourses answer expectation of consequences, think long
Clearly it is not sufficient to just say “be with the right part of the matrix only. Ideal- term and re-assess their goals. They should
responsible” like some do. It is neither help- ists argue that business should be respon- strive to find other means for reaching their
ful to just repeat “be competitive”. In fact, sible whatever the situation. In that case, ends. Eventually, a course of action will be
both of these discourses manifest “faithful rationality is reduced to responsibility: busi- chosen. And each of these three rational
devotion to an ultimate reality”. In this nesses should always do the right thing. behaviours imply very different manage-
sense, both of them are “religious.” And Today, a third type of discourse is in rial strategies.
their proponents are like priests. If we want fashion. It argues that being responsible Take a profitable business actor acting
to understand the rationale for corporate necessarily pays. In that case, rational- irresponsibly towards the society and the
social responsibility, we need to understand ity is reduced to the upper right corner environment. In the eminently social do-
the heart of economic rationality. of the matrix. Instead of raising the issue main of discourse, he or she cannot publicly
In particular, economic rationality con- of corporate social responsibility, all these say ‘this is irresponsible but I make a lot
siders that society and the environment answers use rationality to deny ethical busi- of money out of it’. Thus, businesses tend
are resources for the creation of economic ness dilemmas. These discourses deny that to keep irresponsibility confidential. When
value. The economy is deemed to exploit we can be rational when sacrificing money they don’t “walk their talk”, they hide it.
natural resources using social resources. in order to be responsible, or that we can It is tempting in these cases, and this is
It positions itself around society and the be rational when making more money by indeed a booming business in itself, to rely
environment. But the economy is only one “cutting corners.” There is plenty of theo- on public relations to make irresponsible
of the social dimensions. And the environ- retical and empirical evidence that prove business behaviour appear responsible.
ment will always remain around us, by these discourses are too limited. There are also various ways to counter the
definition (Figure 3). We should enlarge our approach to ra- critics. The tobacco industry documents re-
The contrary is however a dangerous il- tionality in order
lusion. Hence, economic rationality reflects to face business
Figure 3:
an inversion of the means and ends of hu- ethical dilemmas.
manity. Economic rationality is not sustain- We should “open”
An Inversion of Means and End
able as a way of life. As a Cree prophecy our approach to
warns us: “Money cannot be eaten”. To rationality (Figure
realise this, we should not wait “for the last 5). Naturally, be-
tree to have been cut down”, “for the last ing irresponsible
river to have been poisoned” and “for the and unprofitable
Environment Economy
last fish to have been caught”. Our respon- makes no sense. At
sibility is to act now and here. How? least something is
A business ethical dilemma opposes not arbitrary then. Society Society
two types of values: economic values on Thus, we are left Economy Environment
the one hand, social and environmental with the three oth-
values on the other hand. This leads us to er possibilities.
The preconditions
necessary for a
successful joint
venture must be met to
avoid failures resulting
from an alliance
By Divya Joe, IIPM MUMBAI
W
hat’s in a name? Does it really ing ahead with an M&A or JV, one needs sible, alongwith human resource issues,
make any difference to any- to bear in mind a lot of issues and areas, of combining different corporate cultures
body? Think about it! Would and look at things from a more holistic per- and handling downsizing of combined or-
it matter to you, if you were spective. All issues should address one ba- ganisations? What governmental approv-
named as someone else? That too after a sic premise- What als are required? And
few years of contributing productively (or is in the deal for of course, whether
otherwise) to the world? each of the part- While M&A or JVs there is synergy in
With the advent of globalisation and ners? within a country has the deal?
liberalisation, most companies have sought Before either While M&A or JVs
new ways of running businesses. It has be- of the companies its complications, the within a country has
come quite evident that today, to spread enters into any task gets even more its complications, the
one’s wings in bigger horizons, the mode kind of an alli- task gets even more
used increasingly by companies is through ance, each of them complicated in case of complicated in case
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As) and Joint needs to ensure an international deal of an international
Ventures (JVs). that the M&A or Merger or Joint Ven-
Globally these Mergers and Aquisitions JV is congruent ture. In an interna-
and Joint Ventures have in many cases led with their company’s corporate strate- tional scenario it becomes more important
to paradoxical situations. While some com- gies. to understand the local culture, identify
panies have benefited from these activities Other than financial technicalities, the risks, handle personnel issues and simul-
many others have had to deal with a re- other obvious issues that companies need taneously gauge the local environment.
alisation of identity loss. This scenario has to keep in mind before embarking on the McKinsey & Company (Kevin Frick, Al-
also been replicated in the Indian arena, ambitions of expansion through the route berto Torres, McKinsey Quarterly, 2002),
where a bevy of companies have entered of M&A pertain to marketing, legal, human in separate empirical researches, has shown
India using the Merger and Acquisition or resources, operational and governmen- how a single-minded concentrated focus on
the Joint Venture route. However, many of tal. Certain important questions related achieving synergies has resulted in more
them have not been able to complete the to these issues also need to be answered: than half of Mergers and Aquisitions across
process to the satisfaction of all concerned What would be the effect of the joint ven- the globe failing to
and it is these key factors that we’ll attempt ture on the customers’ front? How would achieve prime
to address through this article. they benefit from this joint venture? What objectives.
For the records, going by the traditional pending suits remain on the legal front? How-
book, before one really thinks about go- What kind of additional exposures are pos- ever,
Do Impressions last in a
Joint
Venture…
STRATEGIC INNOVATORS SEPTEMBER, 2005 31
S T R A T E G I C I N S I G H T
contrastingly, KPMG’s 1999 report ‘Unlock- sentation, in the minds of the customers brand in the world. Even for Tata it was
ing Shareholder Value: The Keys To Suc- is minimised. the perfect platform to explore untested
cess’ showed that acquirers who focused on Customer perception is one of the key waters in foreign lands. It was through
synergies “were 28% more likely to create areas where marketers need to concentrate this joint venture that the Tetley brand,
shareholder value from their deal.” before driving towards an M&A or JV. They with their tea-bag technology, provided
Other researches need to realise that Tata access to European markets for its
(Jarred, Poulsen, Customer perception in India, an M&A tea production.
90s, A. T. Kearney) or JV between two In United Kingdom, Tetley has posi-
have shown that per-
is one of the key areas companies can be tioned itself as a brand for ‘strength and
haps it becomes eas- where marketers successful if and flavor’ and it has also associated itself with
ier for such Mergers only if the attitude health and fitness. However, in develop-
and Aquisitions to
need to concentrate of the customers, ing geographies such as India, flavour
become successful before getting into after the deal is is the prime marketing pitch rather
(in terms of share- through, is more than health and fitness. Irrespective
holders’ wealth max-
Mergers and Acquisitions favorable than of these differences, undoubtedly
imisation) if the syn- or Joint Ventures their attitude be- Tetley’s positioning as an interna-
ergy focus is kept on fore the venture. If tional brand with British creden-
straightforward soft the outcome of the tials in the premium tea bag seg-
objectives. These objectives could include venture shows a positive ‘customer’ sign ment would be beneficial for
easy to understand sales, market share and for both the companies, it would definitely Tata on a global scale. Thus in
profit increases, operational cost savings ensure a synergistic effect. India, Tetley decided to use the
and financial trade-offs. The takeover of IBM’s personal comput- words ‘a Tata Enterprise’
But in India, the decision which lies at ing unit by Lenovo is a case to point; where on even Tetley
the core of all these issues is the one which customer perceptions in India felt a defi- packs.
connects the companies with the masses, nite downward skew (Business & Economy,
i.e. after an M&A or JV, what is the brand Asia edition, July 2005). However Lenovo’s
interpretation of this merger in the minds strategy to fight this downward skew has
of the Indian people who are in some way been - ensuring that they are allowed to use
affected or benefited by the same? the IBM name on their personal computers
for the next three years.
M&A/JV… through the eyes of a
corporation’s customers, an India Brands making the
review opportunistic move
Foreign companies, using the JV or M&A With the new trend of Mergers and
route to enter into India have faced unique Aquisitions and JVs that have set in,
challenges. Typically in emerging markets almost every company wants to take
like India, customers have not been ex- part in this race. This trend has not
posed to brands in the same competitive just affected the companies per se,
manner as in developed markets, and are or the way they do business, but
not sure about how to interpret them. They has also affected the consumer’s
are also not clear about the impact of these day to day lives.
brands or what these brands mean in their For example, the Tetley
lives (ADIU report 2005, “Brand Perception group based in United King-
in the new Millennium; India survey”). dom at that time entered the
Ergo, in the case of India, where there Indian markets in the year 1992
has been limited exposure to global brands, through a joint venture with In-
there exists a lot of variance in what brands dia based Tata which came to
mean to different people. One needs to be known as Tata Tetley. This
remember that perceptions are difficult to joint venture helped them signify
change, especially if they are formed over a a perfect blend, as Tata Tea was
long period of time. Therefore it becomes the leader in India for the packaged
even more necessary that the conflict be- tea segment, with its brand being well
tween the perception of the brand and its settled and present even in the devel-
current communication, or rather repre- oped countries as the second largest tea
While, Tata’s could be seen as a clas- perceptions took another toll as most of the brands, or are sold as GM products.
sic case for others to follow, there have taxis (cabs) on the roads were Fiats (Un- Similarly in the field of electronics, even
been many others whose foreign ambitions like Germany, Greece and other European though Aiwa is completely owned by Sony
were thwarted as they lost sight of the cities, where many Mercedes cars are run Corporation, the parent company ensures
necessary synergies while pursu- as taxis, in India, a taxi is perceived as a that these two brands are kept separately
ing these ambitions. A case non-up-market commodity). as far as possible. This strategy is crucial as
in point is the market-entry In order to overcome this predicament, Aiwa straddles the low price segment of the
experience of the Italian car Fiat tried to sell its Uno on the grounds of market, while Sony straddles the quality
maker Fiat. being ‘a secure and reliable workhorse’. conscious market segments. However, Sony
Fiat entered the Indian It applied some learning from its experi- did not adopt the same strategy when it
market in the year 1997 ence in South America. However it made took over the Ericsson cellular phone busi-
through a joint venture yet another mistake when it assumed that ness to enter into the mobile phone market.
with Premier Automo- the Indian market was probably the same Rather than doing away with the Ericsson
biles. Before that, as the South American market and thus it brand name, Sony decided to start selling
could market the Uno in a similar fashion. its cellular phone globally (and in India)
Unfortunately, in their attempt to differen- under the Sony-Ericsson brand name.
tiate the perception of the brand, they were
further hit by global troubles of their parent Lessons to be learned
company Fiat Italy, which was recording Good, bad or ugly, Mergers and Aquisi-
huge losses. In fact, January 2005 saw Gen- tions and Joint Ventures are here to stay.
eral Motors pull out at the last moment Wedged between the American, Japanese,
from taking over Fiat in a deal that could Korean and of course, the Chinese brands
have saved the sinking company. that have launched a slew of products po-
Comparatively, General Motors has fol- sitioned in different segments, our Indian
lowed a unique strategy of not branding brands would find the going tougher.
the GM name tag alongwith the sub brand But then, the lesson is perhaps important
(as opposed to the branding strategies of for the foreign companies entering India
Fiat, Honda, Toyota and others). For ex- through the acquisition or JV route. It is
ample, the Cheverolet (or the Chevvy as necessary for them to realise that India is a
it is popularly known), or the Opel Astra radically different market and that it is un-
– both GM brands – do not gain or suffer wise to apply similar strategies used in for-
from the GM brand name, as the parent eign markets. The existing Indian markets,
brand is not associated specifically with the cultural behaviour, the values people
these sub-brands. hold, and many of the buying behaviour
To place these branding cases within patterns, are typically ‘Indian’.
the perspective of the current issue of It is important to note that even a small
success in M&As and JVs it would be player can be seen as a leader, not by being
important at this point to look at certain the biggest but by innovative positioning.
other facts. The real value of a company, more typi-
Not many would know that General Mo- cally in India, often lies outside its business,
tors actually owns a in the minds of its
Premier just had the majority of the Jap- customers and oth-
license to sell Fiat cars. anese global giant India is a radically er stakeholders. To
However, there was one known as Suzuki. different market. sustain the value of
very important factor that GM has ensured a brand, it is essen-
Fiat perhaps failed to study that the brands of Here people are price tial that all commu-
before it signed on the dotted Suzuki are kept sensitive and quality nication related to it
lines- customer perception. The distinctly separate speaks in one coher-
brand name of Fiat, coupled with the from General Mo- conscious ent voice. For Merg-
legacy of its car design through the years, tors’ brands. But in ers, Acquisitions and
had got ingrained into the minds of the In- the case of Daewoo (the South Korean gi- Joint Ventures can only guarantee entry
dian populace as an old-generation choice ant which collapsed early in this century), into the promising Indian markets, only
(much like the Cadillac in US markets). that General Motors owns, all the brands intelligent positioning would guarantee
Moreover, in cities like Mumbai, brand have been either merged within the GM sustained competitive advantages.
Human Capital
It is imperative that
corporate India uses
performance measure-
ASSESS
ment as a strategic
tool to retain and
reward deserving
Is India Inc. ready?
employees By Dipankar Sarkar, IIPM AHMEDABAD
T
here is no denying the fact that hu- ployed. The reason for this is obvious- give world are waking up to this reality of the
man capital is the most important better and newer products to the customers leveraging of human capital, there is a con-
asset for an organisation. If sourced, and devise better ways to retain them to scious effort to try and measure human
nurtured, retained effectively and optimise the return of the company’s assets. capital and its related investments. The fact
utilised efficiently, human capital can be As all these are critical factors for the com- is that the most successful organisations
leveraged to establish sustainable competi- pany’s success, without credible measure- today and in the future will be those that
tive advantages over long term. Yet, if we ment of these areas management would be are able to measure the business impact
look into the practices of various corporates impossible. But even though people are the of their investment in people – whether
across the globe, it will be fairly apparent key to success of an organisation, human that is investment in employee recruitment,
that appropriate measurement of human capital measurement is not widely used. performance management, skills develop-
capital or people assets are not practiced Measurements of ROI on physical assets ment or benefits administration.
in majority of the organisations. In some and liquid assets are commonplace but This concept is new to organisations in
cases, measurement of human capital is measurements of human capital ROI are India although some companies like Info-
reported internally but not externally to not. The problem is that this was not a key sys Ltd. have already pioneered the efforts
the general stakeholders. issue during the times when competitive and report on human capital assessment.
Companies across the globe have per- advantage was defined by the size of the The fact that India has always been late in
fected ways to measure returns from their company’s physical assets and proprietary adopting contemporary business practices
operations - from ROI of new investments, products. But now, competitive advantage probably justifies the reason. However, the
success rates of new product introductions, is defined by the kind of people you have most problematic area for human capital
productivity of their manufacturing opera- in your organisation. measurement and reporting is the fact that
tions, to return on the total capital em- Nevertheless, companies across the there are no acceptable guidelines to fa-
MENT
cilitate holistic measurement of the human not directly translate into economic value in an organisation. So, naturally it is the
capital. Unlike the accounting principles for themselves and the organisations they human capital which is the most important
such as GAAP, there are no such principles work for unless leveraged appropriately. In factor in a firm’s performance. There have
that would give direction on how to go fact, if one analyses the nature of human been quite a few models to suggest linkages
about human capital measurement. Where- capital it becomes apparent that an indi- between human capital and a firm’s prof-
as the end of the financial year reporting is vidual on the one hand can have the skills, itability or financial objectives. Gratton,
a statutory requirement for all registered abilities, and knowl- Lynda, in her book,
companies, when it comes to human capital edge which could be “Living Strategy:
reporting, the guidelines are silent. This fairly evident but on
It is no longer merely a Putting People at
has been the primary reason for the con- the other hand, an philosophy that human the Heart of Cor-
cepts of human capital measurement and individual can have porate Purpose”,
reporting not gaining wide acceptance in self awareness,
capital measurement is 2000, proposed a
corporate India. The other reason has been self esteem, and critical in order to create simplistic model
the traditional outlook of Indian compa- personal integrity which explains the
nies, which is to view their employees as which are not evi- and leverage a high- link between peo-
an expense rather than as drivers of value, dent but which are performing work ple and financial
or in simple words, as assets. But the shift needed to convert performance of the
of focus from the manufacturing sector their skills, abilities environment companies (Figure
to the service sector should have enabled and knowledge into 1). The most fa-
businesses to recognise the importance of work behaviour which can produce value mous and authenticated model for linking
the human assets and their value to the for themselves and the organisation. These people assets with financial performance is
organisations’ successes. It is no longer individual capitals, when accumulated, rep- perhaps the Balanced Scorecard proposed
merely a philosophy that human capital resent the entire gamut of intangible assets by Kaplan and Norton in their book “Bal-
measurement is critical in order to cre- that an organisation can have. For example, anced Scorecard”, 1996 (Figure 2).
ate and leverage a high-performing work the accumulated skills, abilities and knowl- Adapted from Kaplan, Robert. S and
environment. It is a matter of everyday edge represent the intellectual capital for Norton, David. P, “The Balance Scorecard”,
business situations. the organisation and the accumulated self HBS Press, 1996
awareness, self esteem, pride, trust and
A Primer on human capital inspiration represent the emotional capital Human capital measurement:
Human capital is an all encompassing term of the organisation. These aspects, i.e., in- through the ages
for the overall pool of competencies that tellectual and emotional capitals as well as There have been many studies on ways
the employees of an organisation possess, corporate culture (which is again an accu- to measure human capital. Mark Graham
which can be developed further and which mulation of the entire formal and informal Brown in his article, “HC’s measure for
can be leveraged to produce goods or offer relationships as well as all the group norms, measure,” 1999 suggested that a simple
services in the market place. Competencies ethics and values that employees of an or- human capital index made up of four sub-
include skills, abilities, knowledge as well ganisation have), establishes the ways in metrics is better than crude measures like
as work behaviour. Human capital refers which things are done, policies are put into turnover, education level, training attended
to things people have which may or may practices and strategies are implemented and developmental plan objectives that
some companies use.
The four sub-metrics in Brown’s index
are – (1) Level in the company, (2) Per-
formance rating, (3) Variety of positions,
and (4) Years in field/business. They are
weighted so that the index produces a score
out of 100. The weightage depends on the
company’s specific situation, and the im-
portance of skill/competencies versus ex-
perience/performance. The benefit of such
a measure is that it is simple. However,
the disadvantage is that it is not an all-
encompassing measure, and ignores other
possible inputs that might be important to
some companies.
Monti-Belkaoui, Janice & Riahi-Belka-
capital and most of the companies practice. Close to 67% of the com- resources. Top management was seem-
studied perceived the measure of panies felt that reporting of human ingly unconcerned towards Human Capi-
human capital as feasible. The study capital measurement figures exter- tal management as a whole. The attitude
was undertaken in a few companies nally would achieve buy-in and sup- was that ‘India does not need to adopt
located in Ahmedabad including port from senior level and provide the concept so soon.’ There was an indi-
pharmaceutical companies, internal benchmarks on which to cation of lethargy on the part of the top
engineering companies, improve year to year. management to undertake human capital
export houses, telecom The other significant find- measurement.
companies, IT companies ing of the study was the The reasons could be varied but there is
and hotels. Feasibility Index of the definitely a need for companies to identify
It was found that surveyed companies, the importance of human capital meas-
majority of the compa- which gave an in- urement and develop systems to actually
nies studied undertook dication as to how measure various parameters.
some form of human feasible the compa- There is a need for clear guidance on
capital measurement Most HR managers nies thought it was the concept of human capital measure-
in the past financial to carry out human ment and reporting. Unfortunately, the
year. The companies
mentioned that capital measure- practice of human capital measurement,
that did not undertake the reason they ment and report- even in the international scenario is still in
human capital meas- ing. The Feasibility its nascent stage and it will be sometime
urement cited lack of
did not carry out Hu- Index of the survey before the trend catches up with the Indian
time and resources as man Capital measure- was calculated as industry.
the reasons. Of the 349 on a basis of
companies that did ment was the lack of 500, which trans- Bibliography
undertake human time and resources lates into 70% fea- 1. Bej, S., Pandey, P., Pandya, D., Thomas,
capital measurement, sibility in measuring R., and Vaghela, D., “Human Capital
the most preferred approaches were HR human capital and reporting it. Which Measurement: trends in practice of hu-
benchmarking and HR metrics approach means that companies perceived the task man capital measurement concepts”,
and the Balanced Scorecard Approach. of calculating human capital value added Term Paper, IIPM, 2005.
The study attempted to find out how the and creating a Human Capital P/L state- 2. Brown, Mark Graham, “Human Capital’s
companies were changing their practices ment as feasible. Measure for Measure”, Journal of Qual-
to carry out human capital measurement. The final result was quite encouraging ity & Participation, Sep/Oct 99, Vol. 22
Almost all the companies revealed they as it had shown that most companies be- Issue 5.
were collecting quantitative data such as lieved that given a situation wherein they 3. Fitz-Enz, Jac, “The ROI of Human Capi-
employee turnover and workforce composi- had to create a Human Capital P/L State- tal-Measuring the Economic Value of
tion; and undertaking exit interviews. But ment, they would at least be perceptually Employee Performance”, AMACOM
only one of the companies actually revealed ready to prepare it. Most companies also books, 2000.
that they were considering introducing new believed that the feasibility of measuring 4. Gratton, Lynda and Ghoshal, Sumantra
technologies to measure human capital. the factors that constitute a Human Capi- “Competing on HC”, European Manage-
Almost all the companies, however, per- tal P/L Statement were quite feasible to ment Journal 2002 Fall.
ceived that human capital reporting would measure. 5. Gratton, Lynda, “Living Strategy: Putting
let them evaluate what contribution human People at the Heart of Corporate Pur-
capital management has made to the over- So, what is the bottom line? pose”, 2000.
all performance of the organisation. There were clear contradictions as re- 6. Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P.,
The findings in the study could be vealed by the study. The Readiness Index “The Balanced Scorecard – Measures
analysed to reveal a Readiness Index of was only 48.20 while the Feasibility Index that Drive Performance,” Harvard Busi-
48.20 on a base of 100. This means that was 70. This simply means - whereas the ness Review 70, no.1, January-February
the companies studied were 48.20% ready companies perceived that it was feasible 1992.
to measure and report human capital of to measure human capital they were only 7. Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David P.,
their respective companies. About half half prepared to implement the measure- “The Balanced Scorecard”, HBS Press,
of the companies believed that the major ment. As a matter of fact, one of the most 1996.
obstacles to human capital measurement significant findings of the study was that 8. Monti-Belkaoui, Janice & Riahi-Belka-
are – (i) that such measurement was not most HR managers mentioned that the rea- oui, Ahmed, “Human Resource Valua-
a priority for the management; (ii) lack of son they did not carry out Human Capital tion: A Guide to Strategies and Tech-
clear guidance; and (iii) lack of universal measurement was the lack of time and niques”, 1995.
Attracting Private
INVESTORS
By Frank Demmler
I
n a “normal” year, venture capital screen will you have an opportunity to try
will invest in 2,000-3,000 compa- to convince the individual to invest and to
nies in the United States. Of those, influence the terms under which such an
about half will be receiving their first investment would occur.
round of institutional investment. This is in As you proceed down the path of seeking
contrast with the total of about 14 million private investment, the potential investor will
businesses in the United States of which be making a series of decisions. The outcome
well over 13 million have less than 100 of each decision will be “no,” or “maybe.”
employees. Every year, close to one million Your goal is to get, “maybe,” each time until
new businesses are launched. It has been you finally get the coveted, “YES!”
estimated that private investors provide
ten times the capital for small businesses Advice to entrepreneurs
as compared to that invested by institu- In all probability, your funding is go-
tional venture capital. The bottom line ing to come from private investors, not
for most of the entrepreneurial readers institutional venture capital.
is that your funding is much more likely There is no single “private investor.”
to come from private sources than from Each is an individual with his or her
institutional venture capital. challenge will be to identify the intersection own views and sensitivities. Attracting
of potential investors out of the universe an investment from such sources is not
Not all the same of all investors with the deal structures a “one size fits all” proposition.
Private investors are not all the same. Quite that that are acceptable to you out of the The potential investor’s perception of
often a first-time entrepreneur gets focused universe of potential deal structures. risk will greatly influence whether he
on raising money from an “investor.” This has an interest in investing in your com-
“investor” becomes the sole focus of the The role of perceived risk pany under any circumstances.
entrepreneur as he seeks the “answer” to The first thing you need to understand as If you approach a potential investor
how to access and successfully solicit fund- you consider approaching potential in- prematurely or inappropriately, you
ing from that “investor.” If only it were that vestors is that their perception of the risk will lose that investor unnecessarily
simple. The private investor is as varied involved with your business (and their and for the wrong reasons.
as your neighbours, as your classmates in potential to receive a return) is the initial Surround yourself with professionals,
the various schools you attended, as the hurdle you must overcome. Their percep- mentors, and advisors who can help
drivers in all the cars fighting the traffic tion of risk is likely to be much different you level the playing field.
with you each day. Private investors are than yours. You need to be sensitive and
individuals first and foremost, with the responsive to that. A corollary to this is Perceived risk
same human differences that each of us that this screen is pretty much binary. By A bank will want to see profitable op-
has. As such, some may have an interest in that I mean the potential private investor erations, positive cash flow, and suf-
your company and some won’t. Some you’ll will have an initial reaction to you, your ficient assets to provide collateral for
want to be interested in your business and company, and the investment opportunity. any loan it is going to provide. As such
others you’ll want to avoid. Some will have If that initial reaction is one of, “it’s too banks may fund your growth, but they
investment expectations that you consider risky,” you can scratch that person off your won’t generally fund your start up. Ac-
to be reasonable, and some won’t. Your potential investor list. Only if you pass this cording to this method of evaluating
If you approach a potential investor were like most normal people, your an- from this source, and another investor
prematurely or inappropriately, you swer would be something like, “I will not challenges you on it, thank them for their
will lose that investor unnecessarily invest in your company because I don’t time and move on. You won’t change that
and for the wrong reasons. know anything about you or your company, investor’s mind.
so it appears to be extremely risky. I would
What are you to do then? How do have to devote a lot of time and energy to Don’t know you –
you influence the perception of risk? be comfortable to even consider an invest- Know the business
For lack of a better way to express it, ment.” Why would people you approach Someone in this category is likely to re-
you need to evaluate how well potential then respond any differently? spond in one of three ways to your busi-
investors know the business and know Without extenuating circumstances ness proposal: “I don’t agree”; “Ho-hum”;
you. If a particular individual knows (and there are some we’ll discuss later), or “I get it!” If you get one of the first two
something about your business, he will if this group were to be your primary fo- responses, thank them for their time and
either “get it” or not. If he “gets it,” cus of fund raising, the characteristics you move on. If you get the last response, you
then his perception of risk will be signifi- might expect would include: have reduced the risk significantly. Now
cantly reduced, relative to someone who long decision time you’ve only got to convince them that
doesn’t know the business. Similarly, highest return required, due to the per- you’re the right person to exploit the
someone who knows you and thinks well ceived risk
of you will perceive lower risk than some- lengthy due diligence process
one who doesn’t.
At the same time, though, it does represent If a particular indi-
Advice to entrepreneurs the largest pool of potential investment. vidual knows
Many sources of capital have defined
criteria and processes for attempting Know you – something about
to access that capital. It is the entrepre- Don’t know the business your business, he
neur’s job to learn what’s what, and to This group of private investors that Jeffry
honestly evaluate whether his company Timmons, noted professor of entrepreneur- will either “get it”
qualifies for consideration. ship and author, calls the 3 Fs - Family,
Private investors are less predict- Friends & Fools. These are the people do
or not. If he “gets
able than institutional investors. The not see a lot of risk because they know you it,” then his
entrepreneur needs to understand and are often willing, or feel obligated, to
and categorize potential private in- invest with you. Quite often their motiva-
perception of
vestors according to their perceptions tion for investing has little or nothing to risk will be signifi-
of risk. do with financial gain. Some of the char-
1. Do they know anything about the acteristics of this group include:
cantly reduced
business? Quick decision
2. Do they know you? Lower economic cost
Surround yourself with professionals, Highest potential psychological cost business opportunity. Some of the
mentors, and advisors who can help The last point is worth commenting characteristics of this group include:
you level the playing field. upon. The role of 3F investment is often moderate decision time
hotly debated. Some investors won’t invest great anchor & halo effect
Perceived risk unless you’ve tapped that source. If friends higher return expectations
Taking a step back, how ‘others’ perceive and family don’t demonstrate their confi- can add significant value
risk is the important point, as we’ve dis- dence in you, they’ll say, why should they? If someone from this group were to
cussed earlier. Let’s take a look at the If you say that you haven’t approached commit to an investment, their independ-
perceived risk of the four categories of them because you don’t want them to risk ent endorsement may significantly impact
potential investors represented by the their limited capital in your business, the (lower) the risk perceptions of others,
above table. typical response from an investor will be thereby motivating them to invest. Hence
to challenge your level of confidence in the reference to the anchor (locks in a deal)
Don’t know you – your own business. and halo effect (their participation, alone,
Don’t know the business These attitudes are next-to-impossible impacts others favourably).
Think about it. If a complete stranger to change. If you are comfortable including
contacted you and asked you to invest in friend and family investment, or welcome Know you –
a business you didn’t understand, what it, for that matter, then it’s not an issue. Know the business
would be your response? Why? If you If you choose not to seek investment Again, the knowledge of the business is a
very important distinction for this group. so I will try a few: This is the second best group, but may be
The interpersonal relationship, though, has You are known by the company the first one you address. Like the prior
its own implications. On the one hand, the you keep. group, their endorsement of the business is
decision making process may be shorter Set up the dominoes so that when meaningful, but their personal relationship
since both major risk areas are greatly you knock one over, the others will with you may bring this person’s objectiv-
reduced. On the other, the personal rela- fall behind it. And for the cynics ity into question. Still, someone from this
tionship may somewhat diminish the halo among you, group may prove to be an ideal conduit to
effect of this investor’s participation. Misery loves company. someone in the first category.
Some of the characteristics of this group
include: The key point is that most private in- Know you well –
quick decision vestors will never be able to understand Don’t know the business
good anchor your business, or your ability to run it. If This group is not perceived to have inde-
halo effect they had to make an investment decision pendent credibility. They should be actively
can add value in isolation, it would most likely be nega- solicited only after investors in the first
tive. Recognising that, your job is to secure two categories are moving in the right
Not all investors are the same. Analyzing a surrogate whose judgment that private direction.
their differing characteristics can provide investor will be willing to accept as an en-
you with insight as to how to approach dorsement to both. Don’t know you –
each type and when. Don’t know the business
Sequencing implications If you do the preceding correctly, this group
Advice to entrepreneurs Don’t know you – Know of investors will be anxious to get in on
A potential investor’s perception of risk the business your “hot” deal.
will greatly influence whether he has an This is the best type of investor you can Think about how this has changed the
interest in investing in your company secure. If someone from this group were to dynamics! If you went after this group first,
under any circumstances. commit to an investment, their independ- as many first-time entrepreneurs do, you
To be able to manage the fund raising ent endorsement will significantly improve would face tremendous resistance and
process to your greatest advantage, you the risk perceptions of others. Not only likely rejection. They don’t know you. They
need to categorize your potential inves- have they put their seal of approval on don’t know the business. Your proposal is
tors by their perception of risk. your business, but they have taken the extremely risky. With the approach sug-
Using their knowledge of you and your time to make an independent, unbiased gested in this column, though, the fact
business can be a useful method for appraisal of you. that others with independent credibility
categorization. have endorsed the deal reduces the
Surround yourself with professionals, Know you – Know the business perceived risk. The fact that the deal is
mentors, and advisors who can help
you level the playing field.
getting further commitments reduces the from credible investors had anything to commit to until this time.
risk. The fear that the deal will be fully Your goal at this point is to get an invest- Prudent application of time, energy and
subscribed, and the investor might be pre- ment commitment from 1 to 3 individuals pressure, should get the commitments to
vented from participating, may induce a whose credibility is likely to get others your deal to the 40-60% level.
quicker decision! to invest. If you were seeking $500,000
total, you would like to get commitments Use momentum to drive to
Tactical plan in the range of $75,000 - $125,000 at this a successful closing
When you decide to launch fund raising, stage of the fund raising process. From With the apparent momentum of the
you need to have a game plan plotted out your list of potential investors, identify deal, and with a closing day in sight, you
in advance. the 10-15 that fall into the two primary will have three powerful tools at your
WARNING: I am not an attorney. Some categories of people who know the busi- disposal by this time. You have a deal,
of what I’m about to write could violate ness, whether they know you or not. Of so the fence sitters now have something
securities laws if not done correctly. Make these, who are the 6-10 that you and your to look at about which they can make
sure your attorney is aware of what you advisors collectively think could invest and a decision. You have a closing date, so
are doing. Prepare to launch your fund they need to make the decision within
raising campaign Create some positive buzz that time frame. You have a dwindling
How much money do you hope to raise? amount of investment available, and with
What terms are acceptable to you? When
about your business a “first come, first served” posture on ac-
would you like to close the deal? Are you through formal and infor- cepting investment, there is pressure on
prepared to devote the necessary time and the potential investor to decide sooner
energy? Have you assembled and prioritized
mal channels. Share your rather than later.
a potential investor list? Have you prepared one-pager with selected
the necessary collateral that you will need Advice to entrepreneurs
to support your fund raising efforts?
individuals as an update Categorise potential investors with re-
Business plan (no more than 25 pages, to what the company has gard to their perception of risk of an
plus appendices) investment in your business.
Mini-plan (3-to-6 pages that captures
accomplished Identify less than 10 individuals whose
the essence of you r business) investment commitment will have a
Executive summary (2 pages or less favourable impact on the investment
that leaves someone wanting to know decisions of others.
more) Create a proactive fund raising game
One-pager (the elegance of brevity) plan that you can execute to your ad-
The elevator pitch (the story you can vantage.
tell a stranger on an elevator when trav- Appreciate the dynamics of the fund
elling 3 floors that will make the raising process and use that to your
strange want to know more) advantage.
A 22-slide PowerPoint presenta- Surround yourself with professionals,
tion (that can be reduced to 8 mentors, and advisors who can help
slides when necessary, or expanded are likely to respond favourably to your you level the playing field.
to 60 when appropriate) pitch? Determine how you can get to each.
If you’ve done the job right, you’re likely NOTE: I would like to acknowledge Tom Can-
Begin the process of to be only two introductions away from field of Equity Catalysts (www.equitycata-
getting the word out these people (in the context of Six Degrees lysts.com) for his contribution to these arti-
Create some positive buzz about your busi- of Separation). cles. Much of what I’m sharing with you was
ness through formal and informal channels. developed by Tom and me when we worked
Perhaps share your one-pager (see above) Use that commitment to together at The Enterprise Corporation of
with selected individuals as an update to “knock down a few more Pittsburgh, a predecessor organization that
what the company has accomplished and dominoes” was merged with others to form Innovation
where it intends to go. DO NOT solicit any With the core commitment in place, expand Works in 1999.
investment interest at this point. That’s your reach to the next circle of potential
Frank Demmler is Associate Teaching
practical as well as legal advice. investors. Up until this point, these people
Professor of Entrepreneurship at the Don-
have expressed “interest” in your company ald H. Jones Center for Entrepreneurship at
Get commitments for and a potential investment, but haven’t the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie
15-25% of the total deal committed to invest, and really haven’t Mellon University.
This article deals with the key role of Strategic Planning for organisations in
the current business environment and how it can lead them to the next level of
organisational development, effectiveness, and success.
Revisiting and
redefining strategic
management
By A. Sandeep
August 2, 1968
I
f you’ve been a diligent reader, I’m sure problems, but also in its cultural separation
the statement by Business Week in Au- from Japanese, had posed a lot of problems
gust 1968 that I’ve mentioned in the for various Japanese companies. But Japa-
previous page would not have escaped your nese companies, in sectors encompassing
attention. Business Week presumably at automobiles to electronics, successfully
that time had not been exposed to concepts competed and became powerful players in
of Japanese perseverance as much as the the US market. To an extent that in the last
US government is exposed to now in the decade, for a considerable time, Japanese
new millennium. Business Week in 1968 companies manufacturing cars in the US
probably had no idea of how Japanese cor- were exporting more cars out of the United
porations would one day rule some of the States to Japan than the number of cars
most powerful brands in North America. that top US manufacturers combined were
Even though many Japanese companies exporting to Japan! And Business Week
were inherently at a disadvantage when was still busy commending Ford on being
they wished to enter the North American the first truly American company to have
markets, they tried and still made it. brought out a right-hand drive car espe-
The US market, not only in its geo- cially for the Japanese market. Not that
graphical expanse & the sheer logistics there is anything wrong with that, but the
question remains as an example, why were is so often quoted because it is a case to of the key Honda executives, headed by a
the US automobile corporations not able point, but many other Japanese companies person called Kihachiro Kawashima, de-
to make similar inroads into the Japanese (e.g. Yamaha-musical instruments, Sony- cided to sell motorcycles of different varie-
automobile market, as the Japanese had electronics, Toshiba & Sharp-Flat Screens) ties (of different cubic capacities, from the
done in the US market? replicated the success of the Japanese au- lower end to the upper end).
The Americans initially loved blaming tomobile industry, not just in the US, but They decided to start sales in one part
the Japanese Government’s restrictive trade also in other continents. In Asia, for ex- of Los Angeles where there was a sizable
practices. A part of that is true. The US ample, Japanese automobile companies community of Japanese expatriates. This
& Japanese have fought over many other have beaten their US counterparts in al- was not to say that the expatriates were the
things than the Second World War. Import most every country they operate and com- target market. They decided to bring equal
restriction was one area. Foreign exchange pete in. In India, in the year 2003—2004, numbers of different motorcycle models
controls was another one of the areas. The Maruti Suzuki (owned by Suzuki Japan), without any particular research. Honda’s
US Federal Reserve had & has been quite sold three times more cars than the near- bikes, according to the Chief of Honda in
regularly concerned about the value of est competitor. And the nearest competitor an interview at that time, had handles with
Japanese Yen against the US Dollar. As wasn’t an American company either, but a shapes that looked like the eye of Buddha.
they feel that in case the Japanese Yen
falls in value against the US Dollar, the
US suffers in various areas. For example, In the last decade, for a considerable time, Japanese
the Japanese corporations exporting to the companies manufacturing cars in the US were export-
US would have an advantage in pricing ing more cars out of the United States to Japan than the
their products or services cheaper in the
American market as compared to US manu-
number of cars that top US manufacturers combined
facturers, thus beating American compa- were exporting to Japan!
nies in their own geography. How is that
possible? A Japanese manufacturer who
manufactures a product in Japan for say South Korean corporation called Hyundai, The Chief claimed that this was one of the
90 Yen and wants a 10 Yen profit margin whose takeover of Kia motors in South more important reasons to look forward
would import the product to US for 1 $ in Korea has enabled it to become another for success as it was an auspicious sign.
the US if the exchange rate is 100 Yen = 1 gigantic leader in Asia. Honda also decided to publicise their bikes
US $. In case this exchange rate becomes Going back to the 60s & 70s, Japanese by making the management (consisting
say 200 Yen = 1 US $, then the same Japa- companies were not sticklers for detailed of around three executives) drive around
nese manufacturer, while maintaining his planning. They believed more in entering town in their low-end models. When it
profit margin of 10 Yen, needs to sell the the global markets first and then develop- came to finally working on a formal pro-
product for only 50 cents in the American ing strategies as they become more con- motion strategy, it wasn’t either Honda or
market as 50 cents would be equal to 100 versant with customers and competition. their ad agency (Grey) that created the
Yen after the devaluation of the Japanese That’s the part about vision; where a JVC world-famous punch line, ‘The Nicest Peo-
currency. So much for the calculations, but went into the market competing against ple Drive A Honda’ A summer intern sold
the fact remains that albeit the tussles be- Ampex of US.A and ended up being the the idea to Grey; it was chosen from out
tween the Japanese & US Governments creator of the world-standard VHS tech- of various other punch lines because ‘the
over political decisions, it was not just this nology in VCRs. It might have taken JVC Chief liked it’.
that had made the Americans not succeed more than 20 years to refine its competence If one analyses the statements above, it’s
in the Japanese market. in this area, but the vision never lost out, quite easy to see that Honda’s pre-entry and
Were Japanese companies excellent in that one day, they could beat the $50,000 entry strategies were quite unimpressive,
strategic management for them to enter the Ampex recording machines by making re- lacking structured action plans, and more
American markets and be successful? In cording affordable to households. based on personal likes & dislikes of top
general, the answer would be an emphatic When Honda decided to enter the US Honda executives. Honda had no idea that
‘No’! At that time (1960s & 70s), Japa- market (with their motorcycles) during that motorcycles sales in the US were seasonal.
nese companies were not oriented towards period of early 60s, there was no practical Neither did they realise that motorcycles
planning in detail, or strategising till the focused research that they had undertaken in the US were driven faster and longer
last point, while entering global markets. with respect to consumer buying behav- than in Asian countries. This led to quality
But what they did not lack was the vision! iour, investments required to hit the mar- issues in Honda bikes within a few months
Japanese corporations knew that they had ket, advertising plans, employee staffing, of their introduction. Customers started
huge opportunities if they were to go glo- dealer network management… Practically complaining about leaking oil. To the credit
bal. The Japanese automobile industry no planning at all. They just entered! Three of Honda, they worked on the product is-
sues quickly. But as much as was visible, lion dollar turnover that is almost half of
Honda was just ‘Fire-fighting’. But how did India’s Gross Domestic Product. It won’t be
they succeed despite such lack of planning? surprising if they beat India’s GDP by
Because they had the vision to enter the US 2008. Fortunately, many Japa-
market, and once within the market, they nese companies today have
were convinced that they had to ‘amaze’ understood the shift in stra-
their customers and not just satisfy them. tegic orientations and have
Their main strategies came into place only succeeded in adapting to the
once they entered the US market and got a present environment. But
feel of the market. The concept of turning what about the Alvin Tof-
away consumer perception of motorcycles fler future?
away from Harley-Davidson men to sweet The crux of the matter lies in
family transport vehicles was planned only the fact that for leading for the future,
after Honda understood the typical mental- strategic management has to be a com-
ity of the American consumer. The shift in bination of long-term, medium-term & its changing
power dynamics in supply chain, wherein short-term plans focused on dramatic & market oppor-
Honda after a few years in the US market, radical objectives that qualify to be called tunities. The aim
forced dealers to pay-up in advance for visionary. Any definition of strategic man- of strategic planning is to shape the
their purchases, also occurred after Honda agement can qualify to be a definition only company’s businesses and products
understood the typical bargaining power of once it satisfies these criteria. Past defini- so that they yield target profits and
American motorcycle dealers. This was the tions given by well known management growth.”
philosophy of almost every other Japanese scientists have probably never understood Notwithstanding the over-emphasis on
company during those decades. Enter first, the importance of future planning as much ‘Market-Orientation’, this is a wonderful
plan later! This was the philosophy that as management gurus like Hamel & Pra- definition till the point one starts thinking
has created some of the world’s leading halad have. Planning for the future has about planning to manage stakeholders.
Japanese corporations. And I’ll attribute only remained a visible word in the past That is, should not planning look at max-
this to a lot of luck, what I generally refer definitions, rather than being the soul of imisation of shareholders’ wealth? Should
to as being ‘Vision-lucky’. the definition. not strategy be oriented towards employee
Critically speaking, if Honda were to use Philip Kotler, the king of various mar- management? Should not there be policy
the same methodology (of no pre-entry & keting management theories, has changed measure to manage political linkages &
entry strategies, rather just ‘vision’) today his definitions of strategic planning over government interactions? For the sake of
to enter a new market, it would have to the years. He now titles the same as, ‘Mar- criticism, Philip Kotler’s definition suffers
face failure & demolition as today’s compet- ket Oriented Strategic Planning’. He be- from the absence of various extremely
itive scenario does not run just on hope and lieves that Marketing plays a critical role in important perspectives in strategic plan-
belief. Competition in today’s world has the strategic planning process. True. But I ning and from the presence of a singular
attained new paradigms. To be the leader, believe not less critical is the value of other focus on market-orientation. For the sake
any corporation has to run on a combina- functional areas like Human Resources, of judgement, apart from his definition, his
tion of structured strategic actions focused Finance, Production, Systems, and Logistics various ‘marketing’ models and ‘marketing’
on concrete alternative goal-achievement etc. His definition goes like this, strategies are some of the most excellent
scenarios, backed up by an astounding and “Market-oriented strategic plan- primers for market development and con-
path-breaking vision. Strategic manage- ning is the managerial process of solidation.
ment has to necessarily encompass pre- developing and maintaining a vi- Then what is the proper definition of
planning, feasibility studies, blueprints for able fit between the organisation’s strategic planning. Let’s analyse a few more
action, implementation, control et al… It objectives, skills and resources and definitions provided by various manage-
cannot run on the old Japanese philosophy ment experts.
of enter first, plan later. Wal-Mart will not Kenneth R. Andrews, credited with
enter a country just to test it out. The com- the honour of being one of the first man-
pany has a stupefying vision, an amazing
General Motors owns more agement researchers to have structured a
sense of objective setting, and excellent than a third of the shares of practical definition of corporate strategy,
logistics management as one of its core Suzuki Japan, but maintains gives the following gist,
competencies. But it does not enter markets strict discipline & non-inter- “Corporate strategy is the pattern
until they satisfy corporate strategic entry of decisions in a company that de-
conditions. Wal-Mart is today the world’s ference policies. termines and reveals its objectives,
largest corporation with almost 300 bil- purposes or goals, produces the prin-
cipal policies and plans for achieving the basic objectives of the enterprise tion. As the CEO, he knew that he could
those goals, and defines the range of are achieved through proper execu- attempt to continue competing against HP,
business the company is to pursue, tion by the organisation.” Dell, and Sun Microsystems in respective
the kind of economic and human or- The reason all these definitions are writ- areas, but the alternative proposition from
ganisation it is or intends to be, and ten out here is to understand that no one HP’s head Carleton (Carly) S. Fiorina was
the nature of the economic and non- definition of strategic management has en- also an attractive strategy. The trade-off
economic contribution it intends to compassed all aspects. Some are too broad; was extremely easy to choose because
make to its shareholders, employees, some miss out on essential objectives, some the most important objective for him was
customers and communities.” on strategic fits. So we’ll take this oppor- maximisation of his shareholders’ wealth.
The point where this definition scores tunity to develop a structured definition HP & Compaq were merged in an all-stock
over Philip Kotler’s definition is the inclu- of strategic management, which is what deal, and later on Michael Capellas was
sion of shareholders, employees, custom- we preach and practise to our consulting eased out of his position of President in
ers and communities (including govern- clients at Planman Consulting & IIPM: the new HP within one year of the merger
ments, dealers, suppliers etc). But Kotler’s The statement is much focused to point becoming effective. A true example of how
definition still scores in understanding that out that Strategic Management is about a manager should be ready to sacrifice his
strategic planning can be successful only maximising shareholders’ wealth. Every- position, power, future career for the sake
if there is a visible connection between thing else comes secondary. This is not to of shareholders. Capellas, like so many hos-
the organisation’s resources (and weak- say that the organisation should not fo- tile takeover incidents, could have fought
nesses) and the market opportunities (& cus on profits, or employees, or customer on to oppose the merger. But both he and
threats). satisfaction. But this is to say that if the Carly Fiorina maintained a stoic & steadfast
According to Lawrence R. Jauch achievement of profits or other objectives focus on the merger, despite repeated at-
(Biedenharn Professor in Management conflicts with maximisation of sharehold- tempts by various HP shareholders to op-
at Northeast Louisiana University) & Late ers’ wealth, then the management should pose the same. This was easier because
Professor William F. Glueck (Distinguished have no issues in choosing shareholders’ Carly & Mike were able to convince the
Professor of Management at University of wealth. majority of shareholders on the basis of
Georgia till 1980), For example, when Compaq was finally facts and figures, properly researched and
“A strategy is a unified, compre- sold off to Hewlett-Packard (& formally tested, rather than using gut-feel.
hensive, and integrated plan that re- launched as the new HP) on May 7th 2002,
lates the strategic advantages of the the ground motive for Michael Capellas, A dime a dozen: Is the Stra-
firm to the challenges of the environ- CEO of Compaq, was not profit maximisa- tegic Business Unit (SBU)
ment. It is designed to ensure that tion but shareholders’ wealth maximisa- concept still worth its while?
The concept of SBUs was initiated when
large organisations started redefining their
Japanese companies in the 60s & 70s lacked structured structure into separate businesses for inde-
strategic approaches while entering global markets but pendent assessment of contribution levels
were never short of Vision. These companies were called of these businesses. Dividing a conglom-
erate into separate businesses enables
Vision-lucky as their Vision itself was enough to ensure transparent evaluation of each part of the
amazing global success. But if companies today were to conglomerate; consequently helping the
use the same methodology (of no pre-entry & entry strate- management to decide the future course of
action on these businesses. That is, whether
gies, rather just ‘Vision’) to enter new markets, they would
to further invest, maintain, prune or divest
have to face failure & demolition as today’s competitive these businesses. This is not to say that a
scenario does not run just on hope and belief. Competi- trade-off does necessarily exist with the
tion in today’s world has attained new paradigms. To be concept of synergy emanating from com-
bined operations of any firm’s various re-
the leader, any corporation has to run on a combination of sources. What this means is that once any
structured strategic actions focused on concrete alterna- organisation is divided into SBUs, these
tive goal-achievement scenarios, backed up by an astound- different units of businesses, by their very
definition, many times do not operate in
ing & path-breaking Vision. Strategic management has to
coordination with each other, sometimes
necessarily encompass pre-planning, feasibility studies, even competing with each other, thus de-
blueprints for action, implementation, control et al. feating the concept of synergistic & unified
operations of any organisation. In the same
way as shareholders have independence to HP. The new Hewlett Packard, after the
decide whether to invest in a company or merger with Compaq, now has an increased
not, the Corporate Level has the independ- number of Prime Stake Controllers (includ-
ence to decide various factors with respect ing shareholders), some from HP and some
to each SBU, e.g. investment planning, from Compaq. The Board of Directors in
resource planning, manpower planning, the new HP comprise representatives from
overall strategy delimiters etc. The bottom PSCs, management, other stakeholders and
line is that, transforming an organisation independent/dependent executive/non-ex-
into separate SBU driven units has empiri- ecutive directors. At the Corporate Strate-
cally proved to be more result-oriented and gic Level, the new HP had Michael Capellas
successful. But the top line is, should we as President and Carly Fiorina as Chair-
presume that this separate SBU driven ap- man & CEO. Remember that the decision
proach should succeed in the future? Or is to explore and initiate a merger proposal
there a thrillingly better approach? We’ll between HP & Compaq was a Corporate
consider that question later. Level strategy. Notwithstanding this, the
Each SBU would have focused function- approval of various PSCs (shareholders,
al teams in areas like marketing, customer US Federal Trade Commission, European
service, sales, finance, human resources, Commission etc) was necessary before im-
administration, maintenance, systems, lo- plementing the decision. This Corporate
gistics, public relations, communication, Level also decided how many SBUs to have,
advertising, promotion and production. how much to invest in each SBU, and which
The size & need of each functional team SBUs to discontinue. After Michael left the
would depend solely on the SBU’s require- new HP, (in fact, my take is that the post
ment. E.g. a services consulting SBU might their particular businesses. SBU managers was simple created for Michael to have
not need a production functional team at have the independence in various decision a smooth transition out of the new HP),
all. Sometimes, a non-critical functional areas e.g. whether to build, maintain or Carly became the unarguable leader and
team might double up for more than one discontinue product/service lines, whether later sacked in April 2005.
SBU. E.g. an organisation with various to continue functional departments like Each SBU in the new HP has manag-
SBUs operating from the same premises customer service, public relations etc. But ers in charge of independently deciding
might have one common maintenance de- the ‘Big Brother’ control of the Corporate how to run the business. The Manager of
partment, but totally separate & dedicated Level should ensure that wrong decisions the Imaging & Printing Group SBU gets
customer service departments. The Man- do not destroy the SBU; in the same way working synergies from sharing customer
ager of the any SBU obviously gets working as top level management cannot take any databases and learning experiences with
synergies from sharing customer databases major decision of moving into or moving other divisions; but again, this practice
and learning experiences with other divi- out of businesses without clear approval of synergistic operations is coordinated
sions; but this practice of synergistic op- from Prime Stake Controllers. from the corporate level. SBU managers
erations should be coordinated from the Consolidating an example of how in the new HP have strategically decided
corporate level. As mentioned before, all various levels are structured in modern to discontinue a few product lines over a
SBU managers, more or less, are focused on business corporations, let’s view the new period of time. Even though this strategic
Strategic planning
for a turnaround
The case of Unitech Systems
By Eric Flamholtz, Madhavan Nayer & Shalini Lal
Company history
Unitech Systems was founded by Madhavan Nayar in 1982. It began as a one
man consulting firm. Nayar, who holds degrees from universities in India and the
Illinois Institute of Technology, pioneered the concept of “information integrity”
software solutions at a time when few had realised the need for specifically
designed systems that helped customer organisations ensure the validity and
accuracy of information. Unitech’s founder, Madhavan Nayar, has described
the need for information integrity as follows: “For us to effectively harness
the benefits of the information revolution, and avoid the costs of widespread
information pollution, we need to recognise and treat information as a shared,
universal resource. We need to develop the science, technology, products and
services to measure, monitor and manage turned over. Company wide, employee geographic locations: East and West. The
its integrity, much like the environmental turnover exceeded 50% in 1994. An em- Product Development function was dis-
science, technology and industry emerged ployee survey revealed that employee mo- tributed among the three Group Leaders
in the wake of the industrial revolution to rale was far below industry average. responsible for East, West and International
answer our need for clean air, pure water, In 1994, it was also decided to or- Divisions. For the third year in a row, there
reliable power and safe food.” ganise the company into four geographic was no revenue growth in 1995.
In 1982, Unitech developed its first soft- divisions: three (East, West and Central) There were relatively few changes and
ware product, U/ACR, for, and in partner- in North America and one international. a modest revenue growth in 1996. At the
ship with the Blue Cross Blue Shield of The senior executives (Group Leaders) in end of 1996, it was decided to combine
Illinois. During the next two decades, the charge of Sales, Marketing and Finance the two North American divisions into one
company successfully developed a number were assigned the responsibility for the and designate a single Group Leader for
of other products through similar strategic three North American Divisions. The In- North America.
customer partnerships. Through 1992, the ternational group already had a Group In April 1997, to help revive the com-
company grew rapidly, reaching $12 mil- Leader. Additionally, each division was or- pany, “Project Oxygen” was launched. It
lion in revenue and a cumulative annual ganised into Business Units. Business Units consisted of establishing industry focused
growth rate of 65% for the first 10 years. were established in Dallas, San Francisco, “Customer Teams” in the Business Units
Beginning 1993, the company initiated Atlanta, Cleveland, Boston, Philadelphia, (now renamed “Customer Units”); each
a series of changes, many of which, in ret- Chicago and Paris. Each Business Unit in- Customer Team consisting of a Sales Execu-
rospect, may have impeded its continued cluded three Sales Executives and one Ap- tives, a Solution Consultant and an Account
rapid growth, but contributed to organi- plication Consultant. The Sales Executives Representative. Each Customer Team was
sational learning. In 1993, the company were assigned 100 accounts each in responsible for a handful of major accounts
decided to decentralize sales management two or three industries. in a specific industry group (banking and
by hiring Area Sales Managers in North All the changes finance, insurance and healthcare, com-
America and establishing a separate In- during the year munications and utilities, distribution and
ternational Sales Group. By the end of the manufacturing.) All other existing customer
year, however, no Area Sales Managers accounts were assigned to the Customer
had been hired, and there was no revenue Teams based on geographic proximity.
growth. Also in 1993, the senior leaders
of the company learned about the man-
agement philosophy of W. Edwards Dem-
Unitech Systems
ing, and after several months of study and was founded by
deliberation, decided to adopt and imple-
ment it. The decision was implemented by Madhavan Nayar
holding a weekend retreat for influential
team members from different groups in the
in 1982. It began
company and then a two-day off-site meet- as a one man con-
ing for everyone. The Deming philosophy
was adopted on April 1, 1994.
sulting firm.
resulted in a great deal of uncertainty and
Impact of Deming philosophy anxiety throughout the company, especially Project Oxygen was a significant ef-
The implications of the Deming philosophy among the Group. In February 1995, while fort, which required the hiring of over 50
were radical and extensive. Quotas and Nayar was in Europe for a speaking engage- new people in the field, and training all of
other numerical objectives linked to incen- ment, all the Group Leaders met to discuss them for three weeks at the Home Office in
tives and compensation were discontinued. their concerns and decided to present a list Naperville, IL. However, some of the Unit
Formal performance evaluations and salary of issues and recommendations to Nayar Leaders were new, and there was much
adjustments tied to performance evaluation upon his return. The issues concerned pri- confusion about how the “team” concept
were also eliminated. All processes within marily Nayar’s leadership style. One of the was deployed and practiced. Some teams
the company were to be mapped, defined recommendations was for him to play the performed exceptionally well, while some
and improved. role of a non-executive “Chairman” and others were dysfunctional and had to be
The reaction of most of the team mem- for the Group Leaders to run the company. rebuilt or disbanded.
bers of the company was sceptical, if not Shortly thereafter, two of the Group Lead- In 1998, it was decided to align the
negative. Many of the “star” sales people ers resigned from the company. Customer Unit Leaders also along industry
left the company, and over the next 18 In early 1995, the three divisions in lines. This meant that all the teams in a
months, almost 95% of the sales force North America were reorganised into two given industry group (for example, bank-
ing and finance) would be supported by The catalyst for change be strengthened internally. The group dis-
a Customer Unit Leader for that market- In March, 1999, Nayar attended a Forbes covered that its planning was too grandiose
sector. This was a major change for the Presidents Conference where he heard Eric to be feasible. The group also discovered
teams and the Unit Leaders. Most teams Flamholtz make a presentation about a that it had a tendency to get distracted by
no longer had a local leader they could framework for building successful organi- “noise.”
go to, and the Unit Leaders had to travel sations. In late 1999, he invited Flamholtz
and oversee the activities of teams based to work with Unitech Systems and apply The Flamholtz approach
in several locations. his approach. There are two major components to Flam-
By 1998, Unitech had grown to be a holtz’s approach to strategic planning: 1)
$20 million company with offices in North Strategic innovation at a conceptual framework that serves as a
America and Western Europe. Unitech Systems platform for strategy, and 2) the strategic
The organisational development process be- planning method per se. Both are described
Taking Unitech to the next gan with a series of interviews with selected in turn below.
level via strategic planning Group Leaders and Unit Leaders during the
Planning has always been a part of Unitech’s summer of 1999 to provide Flamholtz with The platform for strategy
culture. The company has always had a well an understanding of Unitech Systems and The platform created by Flamholtz for the
established strategic planning function, and its developmental issues. The next step was development of strategy consists of an
the leaders of the operating groups have a strategic planning retreat, attended by all organisational effectiveness model that
always prided themselves on their strate- Unitech leaders in early December. The re- serves as a “template” for the strategic
gic capabilities. However, the growth and treat was to introduce all of Unitech’s lead- organisational development of a business
diversification experienced during the 90s ership team to the Management Systems or subunit. This template is known as the
demanded a new scale of planning alto- pyramid framework and take Unitech to “Pyramid for Organisational Development.”
gether. Management needed to address not the next level of planning capability. While It is shown in Exhibit 1. This is a framework
only new industry segments and larger op- Unitech already had a formal strategy and developed by Flamholtz and used to assess
erating units, but increased organisational planning process, the key was to improve the strengths and limitations or develop-
complexity as well. The strong entrepre- the existing planning system and ensure mental needs of companies.
neurial spirit and autonomy that had long that it became a way of life. The strategic This template was used to assess the
been part of Unitech’s culture now presented planning process would also be the strengths and areas for further develop-
a management challenge. While it had at tool to align the objectives of the ment at Unitech Systems. It was clear that
one time helped to create a vibrant, nim- various business units. Unitech was relatively strong at the bot-
ble operating environment, it had also At the retreat, a manage- tom four levels of the Pyramid, but needed
resulted in counterproductive or- ment planning simu- further development at the top two levels,
ganisational “silos” that resisted lation revealed the which include management systems and
cooperation. areas that needed to culture management. It also required some
redefinition or fine tuning of the business
foundation to fit the founder’s (Madhavan
Nayar) vision.
Although there are many approaches
to planning, Unitech Systems chose to
adopt the method developed by Eric Flam-
holtz . He had previously developed and
used this methodology with such diverse
companies as Starbucks, PacifiCare,
American Century Investors, Si-
mon Properties, and Navistar
International, as well as with
many other companies, includ-
ing entrepreneurial companies
like Unitech Systems.
The planning framework
used is shown schematically in
Exhibit 2. The process begins
with an environmental scan to
assess the market, competition
Creating a strategic manage- Thus the term “performance optimisa- sibilities within self-managed work teams.
ment system for performance tion” used at Unitech Systems is intention- There were several situations where team
optimisation ally different from the more conventional members could take advantage of the sys-
Another strategic innovation at Unitech term “performance management.” The latter tem to suit their needs. This had several
Systems was the creation of a unique term would include rewards as a key com- important implications for Unitech’s com-
“performance optimisation system” that ponent of the system, while performance petitive position within the industry, with
combined with the planning system to optimisation intentionally does not include more recent entrants threatening Unitech’s
create an overall “strategic management rewards for the reasons outlined above. industry leadership.
system.” In order to strengthen the levels
of accountability and enhance the execu- Implementation of the Use of measurement in
tion of the strategic plan, a ‘performance strategic management Planning and Performance
optimisation’ process was introduced. ‘Per- method at Unitech Optimisation
formance optimisation’ is a term we have While it was relatively easy to introduce One of the key things that ultimately con-
coined at Unitech Systems to refer to an the model to the core team at the quarterly tributed to the success of Unitech’s strategic
innovative variation on the conventional planning retreat, several internal issues innovation with planning and performance
notion of performance management, as would require resolution for the model optimisation was the development of de-
described in chart 3. to really work effectively. There were ele- tailed measurements for objectives. As one
This model links several critical features ments of Unitech’s special culture which CPA once told an author of this paper, “What
of the organisation, such as the planning made it difficult to integrate the model gets measured gets counted!” This means
system with operations and measure- into the organisation. These were to come that the things that get measured are the
ment of results, and this in turn with the up many times before they could finally ones which are most important in influenc-
evaluation and reward systems within the be resolved. ing people’s behaviour in organisations.
organisation. One thing that is very dif- Unitech had an organisational philoso- At Unitech Systems, a great deal of time
ferent about the concept of performance phy that was different from most com- and care was put to the development of
optimisation at Unitech, as compared with panies; the unfamiliarity with many of measurements of goals. In part, this is be-
the conventional concept of performance the elements of the Deming philosophy cause Unitech is a highly intellectual organ-
management, is that the former does not necessitated a greater degree of commu- isation, filled with many well educated and
link performance directly to rewards. This nication than may have been required highly technical people. In addition, this
is for philosophical reasons (examined be-
low), and suggests an important difference
in the culture at Unitech Systems. 3. The performance optimisation system
Madhavan Nayar, Unitech System’s
Company Leader believes strongly that
rewards ought to be based upon company
performance rather than individual per-
formance.
The overall objectives of Unitech’s re-
wards philosophy are:
1. To attract top industry talent compatible
with the unique characteristics of the
Unitech environment
2. Retain team members in a long term
development relationship in many other companies. Discussions is the orientation of the company leader,
3. Foster an environment which promotes at the planning meeting revealed that who is very precise about terminology and
teamwork through collaboration and the Deming philosophy had in fact often the need for operational definitions. The
cooperation been misinterpreted to mean that organi- net result is that it led to a detailed set of
4. Foster an environment for personal and sational members didn’t need to worry measurements for every objective and goal.
professional development about their jobs for these would be there These measurements are critical to making
5. Maintain equity across the Company for them, whether or not they performed. the plan operational and specific.
6. Compensate Leadership Group members The lack of a formal statement articulating
based on overall company performance the desired organisational culture further Results and benefits of the
and exacerbated the problem. system at Unitech
7. Manage fixed costs by providing higher There were similar difficulties of under- The strategic planning/performance opti-
variable pay standing the accountabilities and respon- misation system at Unitech remains a “work
result of the strategic innovations Transitions: Implications for corporate and hu-
of most of the described above, there has been a
cultural change at Unitech Systems.
man resource management,” European Manage-
team members
ment Journal, 13 (1), 30-51.
One dimension of this is that plan- 2
For further discussion of this method of stra-
footballers was difficult for Alok AFC & FIFA so that he became ineligible to
play for any other club in India or abroad.
Barreto, who had provided yeoman service
0-7. But public memory was very short and prominent players among foreigners to be to the club and had a strong role in winning
they would soon start glorifying the fallen recruited by Mohun Bagan. Barreto brought several trophies, left with tears in his eyes.
stars in the next Mohun Bagan-East Bengal in a whiff of fresh air into the team and But very soon, the curse of Barreto would
derby clash. But when ESPN, Star Sports soon it was back among winning ways. The return to haunt Mohun Bagan.
and Ten Sports started beaming live Eng- combination with Edu, another Brazilian An earlier victim of factionalism had
lish Football League, Bundesliga, FA Cup, recruit was deadly, and saw many teams been coach Subrata Bhattacharya, who was
European Cup and the FIFA World Cup, vanquished in due course of time. thought to be a rebel and straight forward
the spectators got a taste of elixir. The fast But lady luck did not smile on Mohun person. His honest opinion about the sorry
paced excitement of these tournaments Bagan for long, as they got caught in a state of affairs at Mohun Bagan earned him
blunted out the lackadaisical approach of myriad of controversies. While East Bengal many enemies. A plot was hatched and
Indian footballers. And once the fans got reformed their management structure and Subrata was also humiliated and shown the
a taste of the real thing, the number of got members elected to the governing body door. The new coach was Alok Mukherjee,
spectators going to the stadium to watch a through free-and-fair-elections, Mohun Ba- a polite and demure person, who strived
Mohun Bagan or East Bengal match started gan got caught in ugly factionalism between hard to steer clear of controversies.
dwindling very fast. two groups, lead by opponents Balram Controlling Alok was easy for the rival
A temporary relief came when Mohun Chowdhury and Anjan (Tutu) Mitra who factions of Mohun Bagan, but controlling
Bagan started recruiting foreigners. Jose were trying to wrest control by any means. footballers was difficult for Alok. The foot-
Marcio Barreto from Brazil was one of the Whatever one group would like to initiate, ballers exploited his weakness and started
What ails
The one time leader of the footwear industry is now trying
hard to keep up with tough competition from other players.
However, solving the numerous problems will not be easy.
I
f we take a look at the history of footwear industry in India,
we shall see that Bata India has been the emperor of footwear
products. Bata had such a good run that it almost became
a generic name for shoes. People used to go to shops and just
ask for Bata and not any other brand.
But today, the brand is facing stiff competition from other
players. A host of other problems have cropped up and added to
their woes. In this case, we shall try to examine how Bata slipped
down and what they are doing to reclaim the lost throne.
The History
Bata was established by Thomas Bata on August 24, 1894 in
Zlin, Czechoslovakia. The company was incorporated in India
in 1931.The production of footwear started in 1933 in rented
premises at Konnagar, near Kolkata, where for the first time
rubber and canvas shoes were manufactured in India.
The first manufacturing unit was set up, at a place called
Batanagar. The factory shifted from Konnagar to Batanagar in
1936. In 1940-45, during World War II, the factory’s production
was geared to meet war requirements. In 1950, Bata success-
fully launched the brand Hawaii. In 1952, one of Asia’s largest
tanneries was set-up at Mokamaghat, Bihar. In 1988, The Bata
factory was set-up in Peenya, Bangalore. In 1993, Batanagar
factory became the first Indian shoe-manufacturing unit to re-
ceive ISO 9001 certification.
Currently, the production units of the company are situated
Bata India ?
in Batanagar (West Bengal), Faridabad ing of the current situation:
(Haryana), Bataganj (Bihar), Mokamaghat
(Bihar), Bangalore (Karnataka) and Hosur Strengths
(Tamil Nadu). Bata India Limited manu- 1. The widespread retail network of
factures and markets all types of footwear, the company owned and franchisee stores Marie Claire, Bubble
footwear components and leather products. allows the company to serve customers Gummers, Power,
In addition, the company markets products across the country. Sandak, North Star
2. The company’s own and Weinbrenner
tanneries in Batanagar and – the company also offers a wide range of
Over the years, Bata Mokamaghat ensure unin- domestic labels like Quo Vadis, Jubilee,
terrupted supply of raw Featherlite, Ambassador, Signor, Hawaii,
earned a reputation of materials. Naughty Boy and Tennis.
3. The company, being a
trust, which added to its part of Bata Shoe Organisa- Weaknesses
tion, has easy access to new 1. The company has a large labour force
strengths and it soon be- designs, brands and produc- resulting in high employee costs.
tion technologies. 2. The company has been in existence
came a generic name 4. The brand has earned for more than seven decades and faces a
a reputation of trust, which challenge in switch-
adds substantially to the ing to new pro-
related to footwear, accessories, garments, strengths of the company. duction tech-
sports goods and other merchandise. 5. In addition to the eight internation- nologies.
ally renowned brands - Bata, Hush Puppies, 3. Poor fi-
Bata world
Bata is one of the world’s most widely
spread companies, with operations in 68
different countries. It employs over 50,000
people in retail, manufacturing and whole-
selling operations. The company has over
4,700 self-owned retail stores, and over
100,000 independent retailers and fran-
chisees distributing Bata footwear. Bata
annually manufactures over 140,000,000
pairs of shoes in 46 production facilities,
and over 30 million square feet of leather
in nine tanneries. Bata companies serve
almost one million customers each day.
Bata has the largest retail network in
India and has over 1000 shops and around
600 franchisees. It is a brand that Indians
have grown up with. In spite of such an
illustrious legacy, Bata’s performance has
slipped in recent times. A traditional SWOT
analysis could well provide an understand-
nancial position in the market has resulted Catterpillar, Stacy Adams and others has
in Bata incurring huge losses for the past created another challenge for Bata in the
four years. high end market.
4. Unorganised top-level management; 4. The problems which the company is
facts: 28 directors have been changed in already living with – high manufacturing
last three years. Eight resignations from key costs – has been coupled with increasing
top managerial personnel since 2001 employee costs year on year.
5. The inability of the management to
deal with a highly unionised factory and Bata’s 2004-05 financial results are not
sales staff is yet another major problem as yet available (at the time of going to
the organisation wastes considerable time print), however, net loss for FY03 was
to resolve labour disputes and strikes. Rs.241.23 million, as against the net loss
of Rs.113.02 million for FY02 and in the
Opportunities year 2004 till September it got worse,
1. Footwear being an item of mass con- net loss further increased to Rs.404.61
sumption has immense demand potential million. Bata’s exports revenues and sales
in Indian market. have decreased dramatically up to 50%
2. Products like Bata Aquastatic, Bata or even more in the last few years.
Airsystem and Bata Lavorazione Artigiana,
which are very well known as premium Now these figures clearly show that while
brands in other foreign markets, hold huge the footwear industry is growing, Bata
promise for Bata. is struggling to make profits because of
3. There is a massive potential for the their huge expenditure. There are also
company to leverage the Bata brand and several other factors, some of which are
retail coverage for marketing merchandise detailed below:
consumer products other than footwear.
Consolidating the factors streamlining its operations are the major
Threats affecting Bata’s performance: challenges and risks which, if addressed
1. The Company faces stiff competi- properly, can solve a lot of problems.
tion from various regional players like Ac- 1. Workforce & Expenses:
tion, Lakhani, Mesco’s, Relaxo and Liberty, The company has a large workforce, 2. Relations between Top Level
which are able to sell footwear at even resulting in high employee costs. Their Management and Trade Unions:
lower prices due to lower overheads and operating expenses are quite high; and There are eight recognised trade unions in
manufacturing costs. in retail operations, the said cost is as the company and the company manage-
2. Opening of the Indian market to im- high as three to four times more than ment has had a history of disputes with
ports has resulted in the company facing their competitors. Bata has five manufac- these trade unions and has been fraught
competition from cheap imports as well. turing facilities and a nation-wide retail with labour unrest. Quite recently, there
3. Change in the taste of consumer and wholesale distribution. Reducing was another call for a strike, but the man-
towards lifestyle statements like Sprandi, employee costs and restructuring and agement succeeded in avoiding it.
the competition. This may in turn reduce architectural, research and development,
the company’s revenues and hence might testing and quality control services, foot-
adversely affect its business. wear technology and general technical
services, environmental, health and safety
5. Lack of Sustained Advertising and services and brand development services.
Promotions: On one hand, this agreement provides Bata
Bata is continuously introducing new de- India access to most modern technologies.
signs of footwear; but the company is still At the same time, on the other hand, it
not associated with being ‘fashionable’. shackles Bata India’s domestic innovative
Neither the promotion, nor the advertis- capacities.
ing of the company, is strong.
The premium segment competitors seem 8. Trademark infringements by do-
to completely overshadow the presence of mestic unorganised sector
the company. However, Bata has not an- Small companies are copying the trademark
nounced any new products or business of the company and selling the footwear
segments in recent times. Further, the in- at significantly low prices as compared to
vestments on advertising and promotions company’s prices. The company is trying
seem to be ‘following’ rather than ‘lead- to adopt legal proceedings against such
ing’. That is, rather than spending more competitors to prevent them from using
on advertising, Bata has started spending the designs. But such counterfeiting has
less on advertising, as a direct result of had adverse effects on the company’s busi-
sales decreasing. nesses and profits.
Planning your IT
architecture for
competitive advantage
An organisation in the brave new economy is as good as its IT
architecture. Thus, companies need to tread the IT path wisely.
By Tareque Laskar, IIPM BANGALORE
I
n May 2003, Nicholas G Carr raised fast, thanks to the ubiquitous computer. As a senior manager, the digital paradigm
a storm by claiming in an article in That means that the world connects and perhaps has even more significance. It can
the Harvard Business review that ‘IT exchanges information faster; which im- make your business faster and more respon-
Doesn’t Matter’. He argued that the pacts everything from the way businesses sive, but at the same time it would increase
strategic importance of information tech- run, to the way we cook food! As Bill Gates competition too. Consumers would make
nology had diminished remarkably due to had remarked, “Every Year, better methods decisions (and change them) even faster.
its ubiquity.2 are being devised to quantify information That means the business’ strategy has to be
Two years and a lot of debate on Carr’s and distil it into quadrillions of atomistic aligned with its IT infrastructure to make
article later, IT seems to be doing fine as a packets of data.”3 sure it is ready to handle this paradigm.
potential enabler of competitive advantage. Increasing digitisation is possible to-
This article examines a generic blueprint day thanks to accelerated innovation in THE NEW ENTERPRISE
that organisations (Especially the CIO and processors and processing speeds. This has ARCHITECTURE
other CTOs) need to keep in mind while meant that more and more information The business world today appreciates the
deploying IT or the IT architecture. can be digitized, transmitted, retrieved and importance of a real time, sleek and scal-
referenced through connected networks, able information architecture and its posi-
THE DIGITAL PARADIGM not least prominent of which is the World tive impact on profitability. All the rhetoric
‘Digital’ is perhaps the second most used Wide Web. As a citizen of the world go- about the digital and information revolu-
word in the world today (although it would ing increasingly digital, we should see that tion apart, the inescapable reality remains,
probably be a distant second to ‘God’ even technology is rightly leveraged to ensure that an enterprise in this brave new econ-
in this increasingly godless world) and that the benefit reaches the end user with- omy is as good as its IT architecture. An
crops up almost in any conversation. out entangling him in too much of a web. architecture, which not only ensures timely
We have digital entertainment, digital and decongested flow of information, but
business, digital enterprise, even digital also empowers the employees and delivers
newsreaders! But what exactly is digital “Eat or be business intelligence.
all about? The question that’s most pertinent then
It is all about the amount of informa- eaten”— motto is: What comprises the enterprise IT ar-
tion we have with us codified into 0s and
1s. Why is that important? Simply because for adapting your chitecture?
It’s basically city planning for IT – an
if you can convert anything – a piece of
news, a picture, a song, a stock quote, game
company to the overarching plan of the total data, business
processes and IT assets inside a company,
score – into 0s and 1s, you can transmit,
store and/or manipulate it phenomenally
internet1 how they’re used, and how they should be
built and shared.
a set of influencers who are techno- act as a sieve to separate the wheat from
1 crats rather than business men. the chaff. According to recent statistics,
7
Business
Business Need
Need 2 the amount of data in the world currently
Delete
Delete Collect
Collect
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF stands at around 55 Exabytes (that’s 1018
The
ARCHITECTURE Bytes!) and will grow to 180 Exabytes by
Information According to Yogesh Malhotra, there 2006-07! Now that’s a lot of information.
6 Life Cycle
Management 3 are five levels of architecture plan- What a business requires is an Informa-
Archive
Archive Organize
Model Organize ning that are required: tion Life Cycle management model (ILM).
Exhibit 2
Business Architecture: It takes [Exhibit 2] Here’s how it works. There are
into consideration the business seven aspects that need to be mapped. Af-
4 strategies of the firm, its long term ter defining the business need for the data,
5 Protect
Protect
Available
Available Monitor
Monitor goals and objectives, the technologi- the following are considered – how will
cal environment, and the external the data be captured (or collected), how
environment. will it be organised, what will be done to
Information Architecture: This protect and/or monitor it, to whom would
level is primarily a map of the overall it be made available, how much would be
information needs of the firm, based archived and finally, when and how would
upon the firm’s Business Strategy. it be deleted or destroyed.
The Information Architecture basi- The most critical is that the information
cally encompasses the application should be as real time as possible. Real
According to research by Gartner, level aspects (e.g. Competitive Intelligence Time, as the term suggests, is about quick
a leading IT consultancy, an average System, Market Research System) that map reactions, about having all the information
company wastes 20% of its corporate IT the information needs on the firm’s specific as it happens, about doing everything with-
budget on purchases that fail to achieve business needs. out cumbersome lags or delays. Imagine
their objectives. That’s around $500 bil- Data Architecture: At this level, the busi- a financial services company that has its
lion (!) wasted!! The malaise lies in how ness needs to define its current and future clients’ credit ratings updated as soon as
organisations manage information to de- needs for accumulation, usage, renewal, they are revised. Good? Now imagine this:
liver business intelligence. The first thing maintenance, and transfer of data within, Not only is the rating updated, but a new
(even before the physical architecture and outside the firm’s boundaries. target product profile and specifications are
comes into place) is to get a proper in- Systems Architecture: At this level, deci- drawn up simultaneously. How? Because
formation management system in place. sions about specific systems that the firm the data was seamlessly transferred to the
What happens with organisations is that is going to deploy, the demands made by product development department as well,
their information systems are already in a the business applications, the data require- along with the finance department. Now
mess, and technology only lands them in ments, and the hardware and software that that’s a real time enterprise.
a faster mess. will support them, are taken. Examples
If we look at the business scope today include issues such as the Client Server PLANNING FOR INFORMATION
[Exhibit 1], it is easy to conclude that tech- Architecture, Intranets, and the various SYSTEMS
nology is driving businesses today, as op- Networking Protocols. The five paramount considerations for
posed to the other way round earlier. The Computer Architecture: This level is pri- planning an Information System are:
interesting thing to note in the continuum marily made up of the specific hardware
is that the customer now has a lot more and software that constitute the technologi- 1. Interoperability
access to technology, and that has meant cal base for the above architectures. 2. Performance
businesses have had to respond rather than All the above mentioned areas are huge 3. Scalability
relegate technology to a support role. by themselves. But I would like to dwell 4. Flexibility
Pointing out what constitutes IT archi- mainly on the information architecture, 5. User Friendliness
tecture in any organisation is easy. Unfor- since it overrides the others and is of par-
tunately, determining how the organisa- amount importance for gaining strategic The five issues were identified from
tion got there and using it as a frame of advantage. empirical research by the author through
reference for future decisions regarding discussions with CIOs of some leading In-
architecture is the difficult part. That IT ar- INFORMATION, NOT JUST dian organisations.
chitecture needs continuous evaluation and TECHNOLOGY Planning for the physical infrastructure
up-gradation is taken as given in today’s Information is available today fast, cheap consists of three parts – the hardware (User
information driven economy. More often and worryingly in humungous quantities. terminals, printers, PCs, laptops, storage
than not, these decisions are dictated by An information management system has to etc.), the software (OS, platforms, appli-
cation software, database software) and and its assets. As a result of this, the IT ef- makes that clear:
the communication technology (physical forts either fail to achieve the objective for • ASIAN PAINTS invested Rs.900 million
cables, lines, communications technology). which they were implemented or become in IT in the last three years. Because of
The first estimation that needs to be done is too IT centric. this linkage with their suppliers and dis-
how much share each of these components But now, advances in integration tech- tributors, Asian Paints has been able to
will have in the total architecture pie. nology – primarily intelligent and flexible cut down the time required for monthly
The next issue to be resolved is whether middleware and Web services – are provid- account closure from 20 to 4 days.
these will be picked up off the shelf or cus- ing new ways for designing more agile and • HLL’s RSNet (Redistributor Stockists
tom made. A rule of thumb is that you buy more responsive enterprise architectures Network) has helped them plan inven-
off the shelf for routine processes and cus- that provide the kind of value businesses tories better.
tom make for unique processes that your have been seeking. • INFOSYS, which earmarks almost
business might have. There are five simple questions that, Rs.2.25-2.50 billion a year as its IT
It is not possible to plan IT procurement if answered, will set the stage for the or- budget, has taken a phenomenal 90%
more than 2-3 years in advance because ganisation to stand on a solid IT architec- functions online (from HR to Finance).
30%-40% of the existing technology would ture. Tom Murphy, of Gartner, in his book • UTI, the mutual fund company, has been
be obsolete by then. But CIOs would do Achieving Business Value from Technology: able to allot units to investors in a day
well to go in for ‘Information Protection A Practical Guide for Today’s Executive out- (as contrasted to 25-30 days earlier) and
Plans’, wherein the company enters into lined these as the Five Pillars of Benefits to slash its phone bills by a whopping
an agreement with the vendor that the Realisation: Rs.10 million.
vendor will, free of cost, take care of any • Strategic Alignment: Will this investment
up-gradations within the agreement period. help us achieve our strategic goals? Despite my exhortations about informa-
Currently, corporations like Hewlett-Pack- • Business Process Impact: What is the tion overload, it appears I have also sup-
ard offer such plans on services. impact on our ability to transform busi- plied a lot of it here. But the central theme
The best idea is to go for a scalable ness process? remains uncluttered and simple. Whether
and modular approach so that upgrades • Architecture: What is the impact on our it’s planning for IT architecture or Informa-
are never an issue. The concept involves IT architecture? tion Systems, it’s the business process and
designing an application programming • Direct Payback: Will this investment de- the value it delivers to the customer that
Interface, which is independent of plat- liver more revenue, cost savings or better should be of prime importance.
forms or databases, and which can be sort management information?
of ‘plugged into’ the existing back-end to • Risk: What business and technology risks References
help users access and process data. As could arise from this investment? 1. Adapted from Thomas L Friedman’s ‘The
against the existing perceptions, a busi- Lexus and The Olive Tree’ (Chapter 3,
ness cannot be competitive, flexible, prof- India Inc. has not been left behind in the pp73)
itable and capable to face the world with race to leverage IT for outstanding per- 2. IT doesn’t matter by Nicholas G Carr,
standardising, mapping and controlling IT formance. A quick look at these examples Harvard Business Review, May 2003
3. The Social Life of Information by John
Seely Brown and Paul Duguid, HBS
Press]
Exbit 1 4. A New Blueprint for the Enterprise by
Christopher Koch, CIO Magazine Mar
1, 2005
5. Getting IT Right by Charlie S Feld and
Donna B Stoddard, Harvard Business
THEN NOW Review, February 2004
6. Based on Dr Charles Savage’s remark
during his talk on Knowledge Manage-
ment at IIPM, New Delhi in September
2003
7. Based on author’s interview of Mr. P K
Technology
Technology
Customer
Customer
Business
Business
Resolving the
Innovation Paradox
in Technology Companies
By Georges Haour PROFESSOR TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT IMD LAUSANNE
A turn-around world core activities and to outsource portions of A new perspective on
We are living in an increasingly interde- their operations. When it comes to develop- innovation
pendent world where change is occurring ing technical innovations, however, firms As they develop innovations, technology
at a very rapid rate and with great ampli- have been more cautious in adopting a companies currently rely excessively on
tude. This has been particularly true in less internally centered approach. It is high their internal resources. It is proposed that
the years following the economic crisis time for companies to envisage technical they should extensively access inputs from
triggered by the oil shocks in the 1970s. innovation in a new perspective. external actors. This distributed innovation
In the course of this period, science and Although the phrase “innovation is a approach is represented in Figure 1.
technology have been crucially shaping our key to profitable growth” is universally The starting point of this new approach
world, particularly in the areas of life-sci- accepted, most CEOs of technology com- is the market. On occasion, the firm needs
ences and ICT (Information and Communi- panies are not truly committed to making to identify a ‘ground-breaking’ or ‘high im-
cations Technology). Trade and exchanges sure that the innovation engine works ef- pact offering’ - product and services that
have grown at a spectacular pace. As a fectively in their firm. In order to resolve will give it a competitive edge by defining
result, technology flows have grown expo- this paradox, the environment around the its future business. This approach is envis-
nentially, as exemplified by the fact that, in CEO must indeed contribute to give him aged in an entrepreneurial perspective: as
less than ten years, the amount of licensing or her the courage to be a true champion an entrepreneur, the firm “sees” the oppor-
royalties have been multiplied by seven to of innovation. Also, as mentioned above, tunity in the marketplace and then mobi-
reach $142 billion worldwide in 2000. it is high time that we envisage innovation lises resources in order to develop it.
Responding to these changes, business- in a new perspective. The new approach Among the required resources is a tech-
es have carried out extensive restructuring. of distributed innovation offers a way to nological component. In this approach,
Companies have tended to focus on their resolve this paradox. this component results from combining
companies are examples of this approach. ceutical industry has pioneered the extent must take the responsibility for identifying
In the case of Samsung, distributed inno- to which companies can leverage external and selecting the project, as well as devel-
vation was used, not to develop a given technical expertise. Johnson and Johnson, oping it. He or she must be seen as having
product, but to enter a whole new indus- in particular, has been successful in the the courage to take the risks involved.
try of advanced electronics components in delicate process of “internalizing” external
the 1980s. For this, in addition to hiring innovations. More generally, pharmaceuti- Scanning the external environment must
appropriate staff and developing its own cal companies heavily complement their be particularly effective. Beyond the tradi-
R&D, Samsung bought licenses, entered own drug development efforts by channel- tional techno-business watching, the firm
into co-development agreements and ac- ling external expertise. They invest in start- must gather intelligence helpful to identify-
quired companies. By tenaciously driving ups; 18 in the case of Novartis in 2001.They ing the groundbreaking offering. It must
this learning process, the company succeed- also secure “windows on technology” by also be very aware of external sources of
ed in becoming a world leader in Direct financing funds which invest in start-ups technologies that may be available.
Random Access Memory (DRAM) chips. and engage in extensive in-licensing and
In the case of Intel, the company uses collaborative developments. It is estimated Project leadership: “Seamlessly” integrat-
two main channels to “import” technology: that by 2010, some 40% of all pharmaceu- ing external and internal contributions is
collaboration with universities and corpo- tical development will be “outsourced” to much more complex than managing a
rate venturing. Intel invests $4 billion per third parties. predominantly internal process. The de-
year in internal R&D. It also maintains a These examples highlight some of the velopment of sophisticated project leaders
number of projects with universities: this channels constituting the “distributed in- is thus an even more critical requirement
effort represents $100 million per year. novation system”. In the case of Samsung, than at present.
Intel is particularly attentive to effectively partnering and acquisitions were used ex-
leverage these collaborations: an R&D per- ceptionally in order to acquire the exper- Knowledge management: Far from being
immune to external inputs, the firm must late your own - as well as relevant contractmake their own obsolete. This creates yet
have a strong capacity to scout, locate and research organizations. another tension in the management. In
absorb knowledge from the outside. This Monitor their activities to see where theymaking distributed innovation work, it is
in turn demands that internal knowledge can contribute, as they may be able to add particularly crucial that top management
is well managed, including a clear policy other pieces to complete your technology handles the human factor with great care,
on what leading-edge knowledge must be puzzle. not only to maintain the conditions for a
maintained within the organization. By working towards the distributed in- high motivation level, but also a strong
Underlying most of these requirements novation model, companies will more effec- atmosphere of trust.
is the fact that the staff, particularly the tively leverage external technical expertise Because it relies so much on scanning
technical knowledge workers, will thus for commercial success. This ‘high risk, high
and evaluation of the external environ-
develop a highly outward orientation: reward’ approach provides new options ment, distributed innovation will power-
towards the market, potential sources of for effective value creation and growth. fully reinforce the outward perspectives of
technology and possible partners. Such Distributed innovation truly takes into the staff in the firm. It will also constitute
characteristics will be increasingly impor- consideration the fact that there is much a great stimulus for learning.
tant to the success of firms in the future. more going on outside the firm than there Above all, distributed innovation is an
is inside. It involves fusing external and occasion for the CEO to facilitate a process
The way forward internal inputs “seamlessly”. enhancing the value creation for the firm.
A primarily internally focused innovation The entrepreneurial perspective of thisIt is the key to resolving the innovation
process is too constraining. What is needed approach is what is needed in technology paradox. Technology companies will thus
is to engage external contributors much companies. The world of corporate techni- increasingly become architects of innova-
more proactively. Technology firms have to cal innovation has been fairly impervious totion. In this way, they can define their
considerably extend their innovation perim- the discipline of value creation characteris-
target product developments with fewer
eter. They must create a seamless connec- tics of the Venture Capital (VC) industry. constraints than if they were to mainly rely
tion between internal and external actors The VC perspective, applied to the ‘high on what they can do in-house.
in the innovation process. Companies will con-
This must be done for tinue to need the strong
specific, carefully se-
Technology firms have to considerably extend technical expertise of
lected projects that are their innovation perimeter. They must create the internal R&D func-
critical for the growth of a seamless connection between internal and tion. First, R&D will
the company.
external actors in the innovation process. By work- play a key role in driv-
Until now, outsourc- ing innovation projects
ing of technology has ing towards the distributed innovation model, com- - those using distributed
often been done in an panies will more effectively leverage external tech- innovation, as well as
opportunistic way and nical expertise for commercial success the more traditional,
in a piecemeal manner. internal ones. Second,
What is now needed is such a strong function
to outsource with a clear is needed to enable the
purpose. impact’ projects, is fully consistent with firm to be an effective scout and buyer of
our objective of strong, profitable business external technology.
Marshal the various inputs, external and growth over the longer term. With it comes By extensively opening their innovation
internal to the firm, with an aim to provide the useful notion of due diligence to evalu- system to external actors, technology com-
the best possible technical toolkit for the ate innovation projects, as well as assessing panies will unleash potential for growth
commercial success of ‘high impact’ innova- external technical input. It is time to inject and job creation. They will thus more effec-
tion projects. The inputs of external tech- such a perspective into the way technol- tively convert the pool of existing technical
nology flow through various channels. ogy companies approach the innovation knowledge into economic value.
License-in technology from third process today.
parties. With distributed innovation, the compa- This article provides some highlights
Buy innovation projects from other firms ny’s main actor in technical developments, from the latest book by Professor Georges
or laboratories. R&D - Research and Development - increas- Haour. Entitled “Resol ving the Innovation
Invest in a start-up to access its valuable ingly acts as a broker of technology. This Paradox - Enhancing Growth in Technol-
technology. implies a schizophrenic dimension, since ogy Companies”, the book is published by
Activate additional external channels as technical professionals working on inter- Palgrave Macmillan. For more information,
well. These include university laboratories nal developments may recommend that see www.innovationparadox.com. (Originally
- be curious about their research to stimu- their firm buy a technology, which might published by IMD)
A
lan Grant, the president and CEO
of Canon India, is a flamboyant and
dedicated leader, and these words
by Winston Churchill constantly inspire
him. Grant is credited with helping Canon
Indian Pvt. Ltd. (CIPL) register a growth of
270% since he took over the India business
as president and CEO in January 2000.
However, contrasting with his on the job
approach, Alan D. Grant prefers to keep
a low profile rather than harp about his
achievements in the media.
With an experience of almost 20 years
in Canon, he has steered the India opera-
tions towards achieving the ISO 9000 qual-
ity standard besides redefining the strate-
gies of the Indian operations. Alan D. Grant
was born on November 13th, 1947. Grant
has worked with several manufacturing
companies globally during his tenure with
Blue Circle Cement in Indonesia, giving
him extensive experience in Finance and
marketing. He joined Canon UK in 1985
“Our expertise
in imaging and
Alan Grant, CEO Canon printing combined
with our focus on
MAPPING innovation and
R&D capabilities
INDIA THROUGH uniquely position
Canon to take the
DIGITAL IMAGING digital lifestyle to
the next level”
6 principles to
make growth
initiatives work
M
ost senior ment team.
managers Of course, achieving that
know intui- goal isn’t easy. Most senior
tively that relying on managers who recognise the
the inspired efforts of urgency of new growth get
a few maverick manag- hung up on a series of thorny
ers to find and nurture issues:
new-growth opportu- • Creating innovative new-
nities is a recipe for growth initiatives without
stagnation. The odds of losing discipline and focus
success are long, even on the core business
for the best ideas; and • Reconciling the pressure
in most companies the Adrian Slywotzky for short-term earnings with
number of talented multiplying requests for seed
mavericks can be counted on one hand. funding
Putting the whole burden of change on • Supporting innovative thinkers and risk
their shoulders will only produce frustra- takers without signalling neglect of the
tion for the mavericks and stagnation for core business
the company. • Sorting out the opportunities that could
Success in creating new growth again truly move the stock price from those that
and again lies in developing a systematic, are likely to produce only marginal im-
organisational capability to identify, shape provements
and nurture new-growth initiatives. And • Finding the time to guide and coach new-
the responsibility for doing that lies with growth teams without neglecting the other
the CEO and the entire senior manage- burning issues on the agenda
1
ever, just watch out for the trap at the other ferings were being viewed as mediocre or
Make operational excellence extreme: Using the focus on core opera- less relevant by customers. Over time, the
in the core business your tions as an excuse to defer any serious focus company would lose ground.
cornerstone on new growth. This can easily become a How does Cardinal get harried
permanent state of mind. While there is operating managers to focus on growth
It may sound like a paradox, but having always some improvement or change to strategy?
an efficient, profitable core business based be managed in the core business, improve- By imposing a standard that holds
on high-quality products and services gives ments must be managed simultaneously them responsible for the success of
you the license to go further in solving with efforts to pursue new growth, not at their businesses.
customers’ problems. It also gives you the the expense of such efforts. Managers know that they can’t per-
funds to support new-growth initiatives. form on the metrics of absolute and rela-
2
The core business helps uncover other cus- tive growth without a relentless focus on
tomer needs that involve using products Treat growth as a discipline growth strategy. Of course, they also realize
more effectively: No product sale, no sur- to be pursued at all levels that building new businesses and achieving
rounding needs to serve. throughout the company growth targets provide the critical funds
Cardinal Health, based in Dublin, Ohio, they need to invest in future growth op-
is an outstanding growth innovator that Companies that treat growth as within portunities. As a result, Cardinal has grown
has never let up on operational excellence the sole purview of a corporate strategy faster than the healthcare distribution
in its core business, distributing drugs to or business development group rarely cre- market by over 50 percent annually, not
pharmacies, hospitals, and managed-care ate meaningful, serial growth. While their including acquisitions.
providers. Even as it pursued new busi- participation is important, such groups by Managing growth is demanding and
nesses such as pharmacy management, re- themselves may lack sufficient funds or op- scary. It’s also creative and energizing.
imbursement services, and contract drug erating experience to spearhead serious Don’t hoard the experience at the top ex-
packaging over the past decade, Cardinal new growth. Innovative growth also needs ecutive level. Instead, distribute both the
was steadily consolidating and improving to include operating managers as part of responsibility and the opportunities to grow
its distribution centres. their day-to-day interaction with customers as widely as possible through your organi-
In 1994, Cardinal had 40 distribution and the marketplace. zation. That’s how unexpected champions
centres with average annual centre sales At Cardinal, there is no corporate unit in can emerge from the ranks.
3
face another gate,” Geschke continues. If to onerous budget reviews and held to im-
Develop many small, the idea passes, that means it’s a serious possibly high standards of certainty about
maverick ideas, not a idea that we are going to develop. Then their payback potential. Since companies
few large ones the spending goes way up, but the number can’t afford to invest willy-nilly, senior
of ideas goes way down. By the final gate, managers should consider devoting 10-15
you need a credible business case in order percent of their product innovation budget
A culture of growth alone is not enough. to be accepted.” to customer innovation instead. Air Liquide
Someone has to come up with the break- Having an idea turned back at a gate is is a great example of how a century-old,
through ideas and translate them into real not viewed as a catastrophe or career set- tradition-bound supplier of industrial gases
offerings. In addition, bad ideas have to be back. Indeed, it is expected in most cases. was able to make this shift.
killed quickly, before they consume sig- “We learn a lot from failing,” Geschke ex- Paris based Air Liquide, had always
nificant time and money. How can senior plains, “So if you don’t pass the gate, that’s excelled at technical innovation, but by
managers unleash broader creativity to fuel not viewed as a miss, that’s viewed as a hit, the late 1980s and early 1990s, revenues
next-generation growth while keeping new because now we know what not to do.” and operating income were stagnating and
initiatives from running amok? Is the Johnson Controls system for inno- technical innovation was leading nowhere
Part of the answer lies in devolving au- vation the best one? Not for every business. – until it was unleashed in a way that helped
thority and responsibility for growth to the You need to tailor gate-keeping techniques improve customers’ systems economics.
operating managers closest to the action. to the economic and marketplace realities In the early 1990s, Air Liquide launched
Another part of the equation is illustrated of your own industry. Examine your in- technology that allowed a smaller gas pro-
by an approach to grass-roots innovation dustry, your markets, and your customers, duction facility to reside on the customer’s
taken by Milwaukee-based Johnson Con- and then develop an informed sense of the site, instead of large centralised plants. On-
trols. During the 1990s, the firm shifted its breadth of new-growth opportunities avail- site production was less capital-intensive
focus from assembling automobile seats, able. Then create a process finely tuned to and products could be customised for indi-
a commodity product, to providing auto encourage and support the right number of vidual customers. One important side effect
makers with integrated interior modules maverick ideas, winnowing them as needed of on-site production was a higher level of
and, more recently, with complete cockpits. to focus on those with real profit potential. ongoing interaction between customers and
Thus, it moved from providing a high qual- Your new-growth process is every bit as Air Liquide staff. The on-site teams soon
ity product to addressing auto manufactur- important to your company’s future as your discovered that their industrial customers
ers’ needs to reduce the risk and complexity manufacturing process or your financial had a variety of pressing needs that Air
of vehicle design and improve efficiency in analysis process, and it deserves the same Liquide might be able to address, such as
vehicle assembly. kind of attention. minimising risk, improving quality, reduc-
4
Johnson Controls encourages people to ing emissions, and improving their sup-
spend time pursuing unconventional paths Shift resources from product ply chain systems. Because of a company
of inquiry. But it also imposes a staged and technology innovation to reorganisation that gave more autonomy
evaluation process with the goal of “fail- customer and business inno- to local teams, on-site staff now had the
ing fast” on bad ideas. Jim Geschke, vice vation authority and the mandate to act on new
president and general manager of electron- opportunities to help customers in a variety
ics integration, describes the innovation Most CEOs will tell you that growth is one of ways. Air Liquide began to realise that
process this way: “We have an innovation of their top three priorities. Yet in terms of all of its R&D and production knowledge,
machine. The front end has a robust series the time and energy they actually spend on which it had struggled to turn into mean-
of gates to go through. Early on, we’ll have various activities, growth usually ends up ingful product differentiation, was relevant
many ideas and spend a little money on fifth or sixth. And most spend hardly any to customers’ industrial processes.
each of them. As they get more fleshed time on nurturing new forms of growth. The company gradually expanded from
out, the ideas go through a gate to decide That’s because new growth is hard. its core commodity gases to offer a set of
whether to continue or stop. A lot of ideas It involves leading the organisation, the new services, ranging from gas manage-
get filtered out, so there are far fewer items, board, and even investors in uncomfort- ment contracts to performance guarantees,
and the spending on each goes up.” (In able change. New-growth initiatives de- chemicals management and consulting,
simple terms, the gate consists of a cross- serve resources commensurate with their supply chain management, clean energy
functional team, based within the business importance. Most large companies spend alternatives, environmental consulting, and
unit, which meets periodically to discuss hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dol- licensing of software tools and systems. By
new ideas and review the progress of every lars on product R&D without any certainty seizing these new opportunities, Air Liquide
initiative. The team makes the crucial fund- about what will actually turn into revenue has expanded its potential markets, gained
ing decisions.) and when. By contrast, most new-growth a greater share of customers’ wallets, and
“Several months later, each idea will initiatives are starved for funding, subjected improved customer loyalty.
those for Deere’s other divisions. In time, ponents, is a good example. An environ-
they will need to be adjusted; but for now, ment that promoted innovation at Prince
since JDL is growing quickly, the pressure complemented the culture that Johnson
to meet targets that may not be realistic was building in its automotive business
is minimal. and Prince’s product line helped Johnson
Werning, John Jenkins (president of rapidly expand the scope of its offerings.
the Commercial and Consumer Equipment Johnson continues to look for good ide-
Division) and CEO Robert Lane, also must as from outside by partnering with leading
work hard to keep the JDL business sepa- companies from complementary industries
rate from the equipment business. JDL was to develop new products. This approach
launched with a tacit agreement among the saves resources for both firms while short-
three executives: There is a wall between ening the time to market. Started as a way
JDL and the rest of Deere that contains a to help build scale and scope rapidly in
The financial results have also been one-way window: Werning and his lieu- the electronics segment of the business,
impressive. From 1996 to 2001, Air Liq- tenants can look into Deere and borrow the approach is now a part of all product
uide has seen a 10 percent average annual ideas and resources, but the reverse cannot areas. A word of caution about acquisi-
growth in revenue, a 14 percent growth in happen. At least during its initial growth tions and partnerships: Unlike traditional
operating income, and a 9 percent growth phase, JDL is insulated from the financial, acquisitions, which are often focused on
in market value. strategic, and administrative pressures of cost savings or synergies with the core busi-
5
the parent company. ness, the acquisitions that matter most in a
Organise to suit the needs of In some cases, insulating JDL may be new-growth context are those that speed
the new business as much as a matter of survival. The debate over co- development, bring in required skills, open
the core business locating dealers with JDL’s outlets is an doors to strategic markets, and otherwise
example. It’s tempting for Deere man- improve the odds of success for your new-
Next-generation opportunities are often agement to push JDL to create new store growth initiative. Keep profitability in mind
materially different from the core business, branches in locations that work for Deere when making acquisitions, but in the con-
with different economics, capital structures, dealers but would not work for JDL. That text of a new business, that may take extra
and methods of capturing value. To suc- would amount to hijacking JDL’s business time to bear fruit.
ceed, these businesses need to be under- in an attempt to benefit the core business. Keen insight and a great business de-
stood and structured in this light. Adapting that strategy could cripple or even sign are important to achieving new growth
This might seem obvious, but most com- kill JDL. outside the core business. But the most de-
6
panies have spent considerable time and manding work is executing the plan. And
effort creating common metrics, rewards, Use selective acquisitions and time is of the essence, because the value
titles, pay grades, and organisational struc- alliances to catalyse growth that a new initiative can create depends
tures in order to better align their organisa- on speed to market.
tions. The last thing senior managers want Executing new-growth strategies will
to do is open a Pandora’s box of exceptions. Many companies that decide to pursue new- never be easy. That’s true by definition,
However, form must follow function, and growth opportunities try to do so entirely since a new-growth initiative is a discov-
different business structures make sense with home-grown resources. In terms of ery expedition into unknown territory. The
for initiatives that are different from the staff, responsibility is often passed to strong precise methods you should use to develop
core operations. performers who are already stretched thin the business are ones that you will discover
John Deere Landscapes (JDL), which or to people who have been passed over for as you travel and they will be different for
operates over 200 outlets where landscap- other opportunities, and who may be me- every company. The general principles pre-
ers can buy landscaping and sprinkler diocre performers. In terms of hard assets, sented in this article have been gleaned
products, has thrived in part because it is companies often try and make do with what from our study of companies that have
separate from the parent, Deere & Com- they already own rather than look outside created new growth, as well as others
pany. Managing the relationship between the company. While it is important to save that ended up on the rocks. Only you can
parent and offspring represents an ongoing money and use available assets when pos- decide where these principles can take
challenge for Dave Werning, who heads sible, most new-growth businesses require your company.
the landscapes business, and the Deere people and assets that differ from the core (Adrian Slywotzky and Richard Wise
team. They master the differences between business in some important way. Selective are managing directors of Mercer Manage-
the economics of distribution and those acquisitions can fill this gap. ment Consulting, Boston, Mass. They are co-
of manufacturing. The financial hurdle Johnson Controls’ 1996 acquisition of authors of How to Grow When Markets
rates set for JDL are currently the same as Prince, a supplier of vehicle interior com- Don’t, Warner Business Books, 2003.)
Path Breaker:
Sam Walton
(1918-1992)
Walton’s strategies established that it’s not just doing different
things but also doing things differently that can go on to make one
of the biggest companies of the world.
I
n the fall of 1945, an ex-army captain, who had fought for the US Army in the Second
World War, decided to set up a Ben Franklin franchisee department store in Newport,
Arkansas with savings of $5000 and a loan of $20,000 from his father-in-law. This store
soon became the leading store in sales and profits among all the Ben Franklin chain stores
in a six-state region. The 27-year-old store owner could have been happy with being just
another link in the chain, except that the owner was Sam Walton.
Born on a farm near Kingfisher, Oklahoma on March 29, 1918 to Thomas Gibson and
Nancy Lee Walton, Sam grew up during the Great Depression. From milking cows to selling
newspapers to waiting on restaurant tables, he had done it all to make money. However, his
first brush with retail happened just three days after he graduated in 1940 and joined as a
management trainee at J. C. Penny’s in Des Moines, Iowa. But in 1942, this retail experience
was cut short as he had to leave the job in order to join the army. Then again, perhaps it was
this first brush that led to Sam’s future greatness.
When he came back from the war, he set up his first department store in Newport, as his
wife insisted on settling down in a place with a population of not more than 10,000 people.
The idea of opening up a department store was perhaps not a revolutionary move, but the
strategies that he adopted to become a market leader went on to become a revolution, and
rightfully bestowed the title of a path-breaker upon Sam Walton.
which went on to become not only the number one retailer, but
also the top company of the world in terms of sales.
VILLAGES-WORLD’S LARGEST
UNTAPPED MARKETS
Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid
A review of the book written by C.K. Prahlad — Virat Bahri
“The villages of India, China and Brazil are The value proposition must be at least 50
the markets of the future…” to 300 times greater than that for a normal
A
t least that is what Prof. C.K. Praha- market. A typical example is Reliance India
lad will have us believe. The author Mobile that started a Monsoon Hungama
has identified the Bottom of the scheme where it gave its CDMA phones in
Pyramid or the BOP market of the world, instalments to customers with down pay- and is not oppressed in any way.
which consists of 4 billion poor people, to ment of just Rs.500 and attractive features The book is an excellent example of
be the growth market of the 21st century. like R world games and news match score reality being different from perception.
According to him it should be considered as updates. The scheme created a flood in the Chandrababu Naidu for all his innovations
a separate business model by corporations, market and all major players like Airtel and was ousted by the people in the next elec-
rather than just as an extension of their Hutch were on the defensive. Evidently, tions. Prof. Prahalad has not focused much
existing products/business models. the price packaging had created immense on the key problem – infrastructure. For a
Why does the BOP then not get its due value; suddenly everyone (read e-v-e-r-y- country like India, its main cities like Delhi
attention? The reason according to Mr. o-n-e) wanted a mobile. Also, according to and Mumbai suffer from the lack of power,
Prahalad is that all the players involved Prahalad, since the value proposition is so water, proper roads and much more; we
suffer from false perceptions of the real- high the company must operate on large can only just about imagine the plight of
ity of BOP. The Government of India for economies of scale, that is, the product has the interiors. He claims that there are not
example perceived entry of private sector to be scalable across markets. many defaulters among BOP customers in
in the country to be bad for the poor; hence Prof. Prahalad admits that the problems terms of loans; whereas Reliance Infocomm
it gave the inefficient and corrupt public are immense, like infrastructure, educating suffered heavy losses from defaulters on
sector unnecessary protection and gave In- the customer on product use and corrup- the Monsoon Hungama Scheme. The rural
dia the infamous “Hindu rate of growth”. tion. In fact he cites this as a primary mo- market is a very complex and distributed
Even now voices are raised in the Parlia- tivator for companies to tap these markets. market. Isolated success stories are there,
ment, although we all know how India has Once the company succeeds in the BOP but the inherent problems are too many.
dramatically progressed since liberalisa- sector, it can easily replicate the success Typically the experiments Prof. Praha-
tion. The private sector (including MNCs) in the upper class markets. He opines that lad talks about are possible for large MNCs
believes that the BOP market cannot be corruption can be removed over time, tak- like Unilever, since the investment involved
tapped profitably and hence does not figure ing the example of Andhra Pradesh Chief of time and money is huge in understand-
in their scheme of things. The NGOs dis- Minister Chandrababu Naidu’s popular ing and profitably tapping the BOP market
trust the private sector for being too greedy eGovernance program. The book starts with the economies of scale being referred
and hence not interested in social welfare. with theoretical analysis on the BOP as a to in the book. Otherwise, small/medium
The aid agencies feel that they just cannot potential market, and the rest of it contains scale enterprises already in the BOP market
perform without the private sector. important examples of companies that have that can take the initiative to expand their
The BOP sector is a different market tapped the BOP successfully through their business territories with Government/NGO
and hence has to be approached differ- marketing programs. support. Since distribution channels are
ently. For instance, we perceive the BOP ‘Corporatisation’ of the process of sourc- now well established, other firms must
customer to be price conscious, but Prof. ing the farmer’s produce is an excellent take advantage of these networks rather
Prahalad argues that the punch word is example given by Prof. Prahalad of utilising than doing an encore on their own. Moreo-
not price but the value proposition at that the potential of the poor. By doing so, the ver, the rurl poor must be beneficiaries of
price which matters to the BOP customer. farmer gets the best rates in the market development to make it sustainable.
JUDO STRATEGY:
Turning your competitors’
strength to your
advantage
W
hy do some companies suc- ideas. Moreover, the
ceed in defeating stronger ri- judo strategy approach
vals, while others fail? This is seems particularly time-
a question that all ambitious businesses ly today. In the go-go
eventually face. Whether you’re a start-up years of the Internet
taking on industry giants or a giant mov- boom, tilting with gi-
ing into markets dominated by powerful ants was all the rage.
incumbents, the basic problem remains the But in the vast major-
same: How do you compete with oppo- ity of cases, it was the
nents who have size, strength, and history upstarts, not the incumbents, who found David B Yoffie
on their side? themselves facing defeat. Does this mean Max and Dorris Starr
The answer lies in a simple but pow- that competing with giants is a doomed Professor of International
erful lesson: Successful challengers use enterprise? No, but it surely means that Business Administration,
what we call judo strategy to prevent op- would-be challengers must find smarter
Harvard Business School
ponents from bringing their full strength ways to compete.
into play. Judo strategists avoid forms of Judo strategy is an approach to com-
competition, such as head-to-head strug- petition that emphasises skill, rather than
gles, that naturally favour the large and size or strength. In developing this frame- Judo strategy is an
the strong. Instead, they rely on speed, work, we were inspired by the work of
agility, and creative thinking in crafting two economists, Judith Gelman and Steven approach to competition
strategies that make it difficult for powerful Salop, who coined the term “judo econom- that emphasizes skill, rather
rivals to compete. ics” to describe a strategy that allows a
This is not, of course, an entirely new company to use a larger opponent’s size than size or strength in
idea. It has long been recognised, for ex- to its advantage by ceding a fraction of
ample, that by first securing a foothold in the market than cutting prices across its
dealing with stronger rivals
an undefended market, a company can entire customer base. The central idea be-
improve its chances of ultimate success. hind this model—turning an opponent’s
However, judo strategy offers important strength into a disadvantage—has enor-
contributions to thinking about unequal mous appeal. But judo economics also
competition. Rather than focus on a single has important limitations. For example,
insight, such as the importance of niche- it’s very difficult to implement. It’s one
picking, it provides an overarching frame- thing to say that you won’t threaten bigger
work that ties together a wealth of strategic competitors. It’s quite another to convince
Companies can
win against
larger or stron-
ger competitors
by mastering
three core prin-
ciples: move-
ment, balance,
and leverage
them that you mean what you say. by exploiting leverage, firms can transform
Judo strategy picks up where judo eco- their competitors’ strengths into strategic
nomics leaves off. Judo strategy provides a liabilities.
set of tools that allow you to do more than Leverage is ultimately the most impor-
just survive in the face of daunting compe- tant principle. In judo, your opponent’s
tition; they show you how to thrive and body becomes a lever in your hands. In
grow. Building on the insights of both judo judo strategy, a competitor’s assets, part-
economics and judo, its original source, ners, and rivals can all play a similar role.
we argue that companies can win against By leveraging your opponent’s assets, you
larger or stronger competitors by mastering can transform a competitor’s strengths into
three core principles: movement, balance, sources of weakness. Similarly, by leverag-
and leverage. ing your opponent’s partners, you can turn
In judo, these principles work closely an opponent’s allies into brakes on his abil-
together. As one expert wrote, “Through ity to respond. Finally, by leveraging your
movement the opponent is led into an opponent’s competitors, you can confront a
unbalanced position. Then he is thrown rival with a double challenge: first decid-
either by some form of leverage or by stop- ing to cooperate with his competitors and
ping or sweeping away some part of his then convincing them to cooperate with
body or limbs” (Yerkow 1942). Analo- him. Detailed practical examples of all
gously, each principle provides a differ- of these principles can found throughout
ent piece of the business strategy puzzle. the book.
Through movement, managers can seize At its heart, judo strategy is about devel-
the lead and make the most of their initial oping a deep understanding of your com-
advantage. By executing what we call the petitors and espying the potential weak-
“puppy dog ploy,” managers can stay un- nesses that lurk among their strengths. This
der the radar screen of larger competitors is no science. There are no easy formulas
until they have built a position of strength. for victory. Instead, judo strategy demands
With the principle of balance, managers discipline, creativity, and the flexibility to
can successfully engage with opponents mix and match techniques. But the power
and respond to rivals’ attacks. Here, com- and promise of this approach are equal to
panies can implement ideas, such as “push the investment it demands, for by master-
when pulled.” When your competitors at- ing the principles behind judo strategy, you
tack, use their tactics to your advantage can use your competitors’ strength to bring
– and never respond in kind. And finally, them down.
Subscription Form
OTHER IIPM JOURNALS
A N I I P M I N T E L L I G E N C E U N I T P U B L I C A T I O N
A u g u s t 2 0 0 5 Vo l u m e 2 I s s u e 1 w w w . i i p m . e d u
Rs. 250
Signature (Mandatory) _______________________
New Delhi New Delhi Mumbai Ahmedabad Pune Bangalore Hyderabad Chennai
IIPM Tower I, B-27, IIPM Tower II, C-10, IIPM Tower, Junction of 32nd IIPM Tower, 19, Inqulab Society, IIPM Tower, 893/4, Bhandarkar Road, IIPM Tower, 419, 100 Feet Road, IIPM Tower, 6-3-252/2, IIPM Tower, 145,
Qutub Institutional Area, Qutub Institutional Area, Round & S.V. Road, Opp. Sears Tower, Gulbai Tekra, Deccan Gymkhana, Opp Oak Wood Next to Canara Bank, Erramanzil, Banjara Hills, Marshall Road, EGMO
New Delhi - 110016. New Delhi - 110016. Bandra (W) Mumbai - 400050. Off C.G. Road, Ahmedabad - 380015. Hotel, Pune - 411004. Koramangala, Bangalore - 560034 Hyderabad - 500082. Chennai - 600008
IIPM Planman
Mumbai Campus