Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract: Effects of variable viscosity and thermal conductivity on magnetohydrodynamic free convection slip flow and heat transfer
of micropolar fluid over a vertical plate with viscous dissipation have been studied. The fluid viscosity and thermal conductivity are
assumed to be vary as an inverse linear functions of temperature. The governing partial differential equations of motion are
transformed into a system of ordinary differential equations using similarity transformations which are solved numerically for
prescribed boundary conditions by shooting method. Numerical results for the velocity, angular velocity and temperature profile are
shown graphically for various values of the parameters which gives the flow and heat transfer characteristics of the fluid. The results
show that the variable viscosity and thermal conductivity have significant influence on the flow and heat transfer of the fluid.
Keywords: variable viscosity; thermal conductivity; slip flow; micropolar fluid; shooting method.
www.ijcat.com 293
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 6Issue 7, 293-298, 2017, ISSN:-23198656
or, (6)
where a and
where, is the viscosity at infinity, a and are constants
and their values depend on the reference state and thermal
property of the fluid. is transformed reference temperature
related to viscosity parameter, is a constant based on
thermal property of the fluid and for gas, for
Figure 1: Flow configuration liquid.
Under the boundary layer assumptions, the governing Similarly, the thermal conductivity is considered as,
equations are given below: [ ]
The equation of continuity: ... (7)
u v
0 (1) and
x y
where b and Tk are constants and their values depend on the
The equation of motion: reference state and thermal properties of the fluid, i.e. on .
u u 1 2u u 2u N
Let us introduce the following similarity transformations and
u v 2 parameters:
x y y 2 y y y y
2
B0
u u g (T T ) (2)
1
The equation of angular momentum: T T u 2
, N u g ( )
N N u
2
N Tw T x
j u v 2 N y 2 (3)
x y y Using the above transformations the equation of continuity (1)
is satisfied identically and rest of the equations (2), (3) and (4)
The energy equation: respectively reduced to canonical form as:
2 2
r
r
T T T T u f ff
1
u v
2
1 K f ( Kg )
x y C p y y y y r r 2 r
(4) Gr M
2 r
( f 1) (8)
2
The boundary conditions for the problem are:
Re x Re r
at y = 0 1 1
(5) g (2 g f ) fg )
(fg (9)
as G
Pr k k
where is the fluid density, is the coefficient of dynamic 2
2 f Pr f
viscosity, T is the fluid temperature, is the thermal
conductivity, j is the micro-inertia per unit mass, is the ( k ) k
k
specific heat at constant pressure, is the electrical r k 2
conductivity, is the spin gradient viscosity, is the Pr Ec K f
r k
kinematic micro-rotation viscosity, g is the acceleration due to
gravity, is the coefficient of thermal expansion, is the
M
2 k 2
temperature of the plate and is the free stream temperature, Pr Ec ( f 1) (10)
is the velocity slip factor and is
Re k
the thermal slip factor with L and D being the initial values of
velocity and thermal slip factors having the same dimension The boundary conditions finally become:
of length, is the local Reynolds number.
(11)
www.ijcat.com 294
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 6Issue 7, 293-298, 2017, ISSN:-23198656
g (Tw T ) x
3 parameter . It is due to the fact that increase in thermal
k
Gr 2 is the Grashof number
conduction enhances the transportation of heat from a hot
region to an adjacent colder region. Since temperature within
the boundary layer is more than the outside so temperature
u
L is the velocity slip parameter becomes less.
The variations of micro-rotation profile for various values of
www.ijcat.com 295
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 6Issue 7, 293-298, 2017, ISSN:-23198656
1.1
0.8
1
0.7
0.9
0.8 0.6
0.7 0.5
r = -5, -3, -1
0.6
f'
0.4
r = -.5, -.3, .-1
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2 0.1
0.1 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Figure 2:Velocity profile for different Figure 5: Temperature profile for different
r r
0.9 0.8
0.8 0.7
0.7 0.6
M = .1, .2, .3
0.6 0.5
f'
0.4 0.3
0.3 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Figure 3:Velocity profile for different M Figure 6: Temperature profile for different M
1
1
0.9
0.9
0.8
= .5, 1, 1.5
0.8 0.7
0.6
0.7
0.5
f'
k = -5, -2, -1
0.6 0.4
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.4 0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Figure 4:Velocity profile for different Figure 7: Temperature profile for different
k
www.ijcat.com 296
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 6Issue 7, 293-298, 2017, ISSN:-23198656
-0.2 increases.
4. Velocity increases and micro-rotation decreases with
-0.25 the increase of velocity slip parameter .
-0.3
5. REFERENCES
-0.35
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 [1] Eringen, A.C. 1964, Int. J. Eng. Sci.
[2] Chaudhary, R.C. and Jha, A. K. 2008, Effects of
Figure 8: Micro-rotation Profile for different chemical reactions on MHD micropolar fluid flow past a
r vertical plate in slip-flow regime, Appl. Math. Mech.
Engl. Ed.
0.45
[3] Das, K. 2012, Slip effects on MHD mixed convection
0.4 stagnation point flow of a micropolar fluid towards a
shrinking vertical sheet, Computers and Mathematics
0.35
M = .1, .2, .3
with Applications.
0.3
[4] Das, K. 2012, Slip effects on heat and mass transfer in
0.25 MHD micropolar fluid flow over an inclined plate with
g
0.2
thermal radiation and chemical reaction, Int. J. Numer.
Meth. Fluids.
0.15
[5] Adesanya, S.O. 2015, Free convection flow of heat
0.1 generating fluid through a porous vertical channel with
0.05
velocity slip and temperature jump, Ain Shams
Engineering Journal.
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
[6] Mahmoud, M.A.A. and Waheed, S. E. 2010, Effects of
slip and heat generation/absorption on MHD mixed
Figure 9: Micro-rotation Profile for different M convection flow of a micropolar fluid over a heated
stretching surface, Mathematical problems in
Engineering.
0.9 [7] Narayana, K. L. and Ganadhar, K. 2015, Second order
0.8
slip flow of a MHD micropolar fluid over an unsteady
stretching surface.
0.7
[8] Mahmoud, M. A. A. and Waheed, S. E. 2012, MHD flow
0.6
and heat transfer of a micropolar fluid over a stretching
0.5
= .5, 1, 1.5
surface with heat generation (absorption) and slip
0.4
velocity, Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society.
[9] Abo-Dahab, S. and Mohamad, R.A. 2012, Unsteady flow
0.3
of radiating and chemically reacting MHD micropolar
0.2 fluid in slip-flow regime with heat generation.
0.1
[10] Das, K. 2014, A mathematical model on
0 magnetohydrodynamic slip-flow and heat transfer over a
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
non- linear stretching sheet, Thermal Science.
[11] Zaib, A and Shafic, S. 2015, Slip effect on unsteady
Figure 10: Micro-rotation Profile for different MHD stagnation-point flow of a micropolar fluid
towards a shrinking sheet with thermophoresis effect,
4. CONCLUSION International Journal for Computational Methods in a
In this study, an investigation has been carried out on the Engineering Science and Mechanics.
effects of varriable viscosity and thermal conductivity on [12] Mukhopadhyay, S. and Mandal, I. C. 2015,
steady MHD slip flow of a micropolar fluid over a vertical Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) mixed convection slip
plate. flow and heat transfer over a vertical porous plate,
The following conclusions can be drawn from the above Engineering Science and Technology, an International
study: Journal.
www.ijcat.com 297
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research
Volume 6Issue 7, 293-298, 2017, ISSN:-23198656
[13] Lai, F.C. and Kulacki, F.A. 1990, The Effect of Variable
Viscosity on Convective Heat and Mass Transfer along a
Vertical Surface in Saturated Porous Media Int.J.Heat
Mass Transfer.
www.ijcat.com 298