Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

ARTICLE 25 (3)(b)

A
person who orders a crime is not a mere accomplice but rather a perpetrator by means, using a
subordinate to commit the crime. Indeed, the identical article 2 para. 1 (b) of the 1996 Draf
Code was intended to provide for the criminal responsibility of mid-level officials who order
their subordinates to commit crimes. The ICTR, in the Akayesu judgment, held that "ordering
implies a superior-subordinate relationship" whereby "the person in a position of authority uses
it to convince (or coerce) another to commit an offence" . Such a at least de facto "superior-
subordinate relationship" is also the first and basic requirement of command or superior
responsibility as first confirmed in the "Celebici" case and adopted by the subsequent case law
of the ad hoc Tribunals. Consequently, the first alternative in subparagraph (b) ("[o]rders")
complements the command responsibility provision (article 28): in the latter case the superior is
liable for an omission, in the case of an order to commit a crime the superior is liable for
commission for having "ordered". In conclusion, the first alternative in subparagraph (b) actually
belongs to the forms of perpetration provided for in subparagraph (a), being a form of
commission "through another person".

Soliciting a crime means, inter alia, "urging, advising, commanding, or otherwise inciting
another to commit a crime". Similarly, inducing entails the "enticement or urging of another
person to commit a crime". Thus, both terms basically refer to a situation where a person is
influenced by another to commit a crime. In fact, the French version of the Statute speaks of
"sollicite ou encourage", thereby using a form of solicitation to express the English term induce.
In substance, in both cases a person is caused to commit a crime. Such "causal" influence is
normally of a psychological nature (persuasion) but may also take the form of physical pressure
(coercion) within the meaning of vis compulsiva. It may also occur in a chain, i.e., a person
induces another to induce a third person to commit a crime. In contrast to cases of "ordering",
a superior-subordinate relationship is not necessary.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen