Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By
Master of Education
Greensburg, Pennsylvania
August 5, 2017
ABSTRACT:
THE USE OF SELF-CONTAINED CLASSROOMS
FOR STUDENTS WHO ARE TWICE EXCEPTIONAL
Sydney Geyer
Seton Hill University 2017
This study was an attempt to determine that students who are twice exceptional (gifted
and some other physical, mental or emotional disability) benefit academically and motivationally
from self-contained classrooms when compared to students who are twice exceptional receiving
only pullout enrichment and support for gifted and special education. This study took place in a
private school in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in grades six, seven and eight. Students who are
Twice Exceptional attended school in one of two environments for three years. Environment
One was a general education classroom in which students that are Twice Exceptional received
weekly gifted enrichment in a resource classroom and pullout special education support as
needed based upon individual needs. Environment Two was a self-contained classroom thats
population was only comprised of students that are Twice Exceptional. This environment was
instructed by a Special Education certified teacher. The teacher in Environment Two also
received coursework on Twice Exceptionality, allowing her this knowledge when instructing the
baseline of academic ability and motivation. Qualitative data was collected from previous
teachers, parents and the students to better understand academic motivation. Quantitative data
was collected from each individuals test scores, Individualized Education Plan and Gifted
Individualized Education Plan. Students academic achievement and motivation was measured
at the start of the project, one year later and at the close of the project. The Pennsylvania State
achievement. The Childrens Academic Intrinsic Motivation Inventory was used to measure
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction 4
A. Research Questions .. 5
B. Deliminations .. 5
C. Rationale . 6
D. Definition of Terms . 6
E. Assumptions .. 6
B. Subjects . 14
C. Instruments 14
D. Procedures 14
V. Bibliography 16
2
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. 8
3
I. INTRODUCTION
Historically, Special Education has a timeline that dates back to between the late
eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. This was an era where students with special needs
were placed in asylums and institutions. As time went on, public schools started having classes
for students who were not deemed fit for the general education classroom in the 1920s. The
development of research facilities such as one at the University of Illinois opened in 1951. In
1930 counseling services became a common resource in urban schools and by 1950 nearly
every urban school had some sort of special education program. By 1975, The Education for All
Handicapped Children Act was passed. Although this marks a major turning point for special
education in the school, this is clearly not where it all began (encyclopedia.com).
Gifted and Talented Education came into fruition in the 1920s. Many research studies
were conducted in the twenties and thirties by Lewis Terman and Leta Hollingworth to further
the understanding of students that are diagnosed, today, as gifted and talented. The definition of
gifted as well as the available programming changed for the better in the 1970s moving towards
the programming that there is today. In 1990, The National Research Center on the Gifted and
Talented was started at the University of Connecticut. Not until 1998 were there standards
published for teachers of gifted students. These standards were altered in 2006 and again in
2013 (nagc.org).
Twice exceptional students are students who possess qualities of both special needs as
well as gifted and talented. As early as the seventies, studies were being done to determine
what Twice Exceptional truly means. In 1981, Johns Hopkins University brought together
professionals from both fields- learning disabilities and giftedness. This meeting provided most
4
of what we currently have established for identifying students who are Twice Exceptional
(2enewsletter.com).
From the eighties and nineties to today, thousands of research studies have been
conducted to find what means are deemed best to meet the needs of students who are Twice
Exceptional. All of these studies have come to one reasonable conclusion- 2e students require
A. Research Questions
1. Will middle level students who are Twice Exceptional show higher academic
2. Will middle level students who are Twice Exceptional show higher academic
and receiving pullout services for gifted and special education over a three year
period of time?
B. Deliminations
1. The study is delimited to the middle level grades (sixth through eighth grade) in a private
2. The instruction is delimited to students that are Twice Exceptional in one middle level
5
C. Rationale
This study is being completed as an effort to further confirm the need for differentiation of
previous methods for meeting the needs of students who are Twice Exceptional. Research
supports the hypothesis that pulling students out of the general education classroom to receive
enrichment services in a resource classroom infrequently, especially when these students have
other Special Education needs, is not the Least Restrictive Environment or best method for
meeting the academic and motivational needs of these learners. Reform is needed for these
D. Definition of Terms
1. Twice Exceptional (2e): Students who have above-average intelligence and are
E. Assumptions
Two major assumptions are generalized throughout this study. These ideas are that (a)
there is a need for self-contained classrooms for students that are Twice Exceptional and that
(b) the academic needs of students that are Twice Exceptional are not being met in the general
education classroom with infrequent gifted enrichment and pullout special education services. It
6
is expected that this study will confirm the need for the alteration of the education of students
7
III. RELATED RESEARCH
Starting in the 1970s, research was beginning to spark about students who are Twice
Exceptional. 1981 is a year that holds so much value in this field of research. In this year, Johns
Hopkins University held a colloquium for people in the field of learning disabilities and the field
of giftedness. For the first time ever a large gathering was held and this meeting of the minds
helped to collaborate and develop a type of list of characteristics of individuals who might be
Twice Exceptional. The table below shows many of this and although it is old, it is still very
relevant:
Jumping ahead to not long ago, in 2009 an article was published detailing the immense
struggle in identifying the Twice Exceptional learner. Before a school can ever identify how to
8
meet the needs of these special learners, they must first identify the learners themselves. This
proves to be extremely difficult due to the fact that so many of these unique characteristics can
mask one another. The article Twice Exceptional Children, states Twice exceptional children
dont need to be fixed. Theyre not broken. They simply need your guidance as to how best to
forge ahead (Fliess, 2009, para. 10). This helps educators to truly see the need for better
programming for these students who are Twice Exceptional and the extreme need for educators
to remain steadfast and open-minded for the Twice Exceptional children. Fliess also provides a
list helping to identify Twice Exceptional children. A teacher or parent might see an outstanding
talent or ability, discrepancy between expected and actual achievement, difficulty getting along
with peers, low self-esteem, evidence of underachieving, the appearance of laziness and an
Twice Exceptional students are better defined and represented as well as giving many
explanations of the needs of these special learners. Bracamonte states that,"two to five
percent of the gifted population have LDs and two to five percent of students with LDs are
gifted" (Bracamonte, 2010, para. 5) While this percentage may seem small, according to
Bracamonte's numbers, that is 1,300 to 4,500 2e students in the U.S.! She goes on to give
profiles of many different students who are Twice Exceptional and how diagnosis can be
identical but the individuals show their characterics very differently. When developing a plan for
2e learners, Programming for 2e students must include strategies to: nurture the students
strengths and interests, foster their social/emotional development, enhance their capacity to
cope with mixed abilities, identify learning gaps and provide explicit, remediative instruction,
support the development of compensatory strategies (Reis & McCoach, 2000, and Smutny,
2001).
9
In 2012, a piece of literature was published entitled, Studies Shed Light on Twice
Exceptional Students by Sarah D. Sparks. This article discusses not only the high rate of
students who are Twice Exceptional, but also the need for earlier identification. Sparks writes,
Ms. Kalbfleisch and other experts estimate there were 300,000 twice-exceptional
studentsintellectually gifted children also diagnosed with learning disabilitiesin 2004, when
the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act first noted that students with disabilities may also
be gifted. (2012, para. 3) In addition to such high numbers of 2e students, this article and
related research begins to dissect the need for earlier diagnosis and support. The timing of an
evaluation can mean the difference between a student being identified as gifted or disabled, she
explained, because while giftedness can mask a disability early on, over time, the disability can
hide a student's strengths (Sparks, 2012, para. 5). People are beginning to analyze the ways in
which the giftedness and learning disabilities can mask one another causing the Twice
Exceptionality to appear quite average as far as academic achievement and motivation goes.
Rose Blackett, a psychologist and educator, also published an article in the year 2012.
She writes extensively on the lack of needs being met to the minority population of Twice
Exceptional students. From her research she provides a list of tips for identifying 2e students
from her research in New Zealand. These include oral questioning instead of written responses,
enlisting a writer to record answers, reduce the number of time limited tests given, using Raven
Matrices, and administering short answer tests (Blackett, 2012, para. 2). This publication adds,
"Gifted children with learning disabilities are invisible in most school systems because they are
not failing...not failing school...but they are failing to realize their intellectual and creative
Perspectives by Carolyn M. Callahan and Holly L. Hertberg-Davis was published. This book
10
contains vast amounts of information regarding the struggles teachers encounter when
identifying 2e students. As people continue research Twice Exceptional children, this huge issue
not usually receive extensive education in either special or gifted education unless they seek it
out explicitly. Training and professional development opportunities and requirements for training
and certification also vary by state. (2013, p. 364). This uncovers a huge issue in the
educational system for the education of teachers in this area of learners. There proves to be a
Currently research continues on Twice Exceptional students and in the year 2017 a book
was published by a Seton Hill University professor, Dr. Audrey Quinlan. Her work is entitled,
Gifted or Just Plain Smart?: Teaching the 99th Percentile Made Easier. Quinlans work speaks
volumes in her clear explanation for the three main scenarios that make diagnosing students
with Twice Exceptionalities so difficult. These three scenarios are, Students identified as gifted
whose giftedness hides the disability. Signs of the disability may show up later as academic
challenges increase. These students are often accused of simply being lazy or of not meeting
their potential when their schoolwork falters. Students identified as disabled whose disability
hides the giftedness. Students receive services for the identified disability but not for their gifted
level. However, these students may show exceptional abilities in some areas. Because of this,
they have a better chance of being identified. Students identified as average. These are highly
intelligent students whose intelligence and disability mask each other. These students seem
average because their two exceptionalities cancel each other (Quinlan, 2017, Twice
Exceptional or 2e).
Through all of the existing research, the education system is learning how to best identify
Twice Exceptional students. Moving forward, there are also many clearly defined means for best
11
educating and reaching these exceptional learners through teaching styles, techniques and
curriculum. Despite all that is known thus far regarding this topic, it is evident that need exists for
further research into the environment for implementing Twice Exceptional instruction.
12
IV. DESIGN OF THE STUDY
Prior to the school year when this study would begin, the educators (administrators and
teachers) taking part on the study would be given coursework from a university in the area of
Twice Exceptional students. This would give them the necessary knowledge and tools to bring
this into their general education classroom, self-contained classroom or just into the school,
overall. The school year would begin with each grade level (six, seven, and eight) having half of
the Twice Exceptional population split into two groups. One group would be placed in a
self-contained classroom with all Twice Exceptional students. The teacher in this room will be a
special education certified teacher that will use the Twice Exceptional coursework to create a
curriculum (prior to the school year) and classroom community that supports all of the different
individuals who are twice exceptional. The second group would be placed into the general
education setting with a teacher who received the Twice Exceptional coursework and the Twice
Exceptional students would receive necessary pull out and push in support and enrichment for
Throughout the school year, surveys will be given to the students, families of the
students and other educators and faculty in the building that regularly interact with the students
to better understand their academic achievement and motivation throughout the year. In
addition to this, IEPs and GIEPs will be read and data will be collected to see present levels and
goals for each individual to help monitor growth. Annual PSSA scores will be used for academic
achievement growth and the Childrens Academic Intrinsic Motivation Inventory will be used to
Because this study will run for three years, some students will have one year in the
program, some will have two years and the starting year of sixth graders will have three full
13
years. The amount of time in each setting will be taken into consideration too to see if this make
B. Subjects
The subjects for this experiment are students in grades six, seven and eight. These
students must have an Individualized Education Plan and a Gifted Individualized Education Plan
or some documentation of either learning disabilities as well as giftedness. The subjects are
students at a private school in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Each individual may fall into any of the
three possible categories for potential misdiagnosis as mentioned above. These students will
also fit into one or more of the categories in the table above.
C. Instruments
Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected over the three year time frame of the
study. Qualitatively, data will be collected using surveys given to families, students and
educators in the school. Quantitatively, data will be collected three times throughout each of the
three years of the study. This will occur once before the school year, once in the middle of the
school year and once at the end of the school year. This will occur each of the three years. The
students Individualized Education Plan (IEP) or Gifted Individualized Education Plan (GIEP) will
also be used for quantitative data collection. The Pennsylvania State Standardized Assessment
(PSSA) will be used to assess academic achievement and the Childrens Academic Intrinsic
D. Procedures
The study will work directly with the school to provide parents with the information
regarding the two placement options. Through data collection and parent interviews, the most
appropriate environment of the two options will be selected for each individual. The school
district will open this study to surrounding public and private schools for students that meet the
14
necessary requirements. Students will be required to provide their own transportation in this
scenario. The study will also provide the necessary professional development to the two
educators regarding Twice Exceptional curriculum and tips. Teachers will receive this
professional development prior to the study as well as throughout the three years.
Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected and recorded throughout the three year
study. This will all be used collectively to measure whether the students showed higher levels of
academic achievement and/or motivation in the self-contained classroom with all Twice
Exceptional students or in the general education classroom with pullout resources for special
In the future, it would be beneficial to see this study over a longer period of time or with a
teacher that completed extensive research in the area of Twice Exceptional children as it grows
as a trending topic in education. This study also does not measure social skills, organizational
skills and other factors aside from motivation and academic achievement. It might be interesting
15
V. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bracamonte, M. (2010). Twice-exceptional students: Who are they and what do they need?
Retrieved: http://www.2enewsletter.com/article_2e_what_are_they.html
Callahan, C. M., & Hertberg-Davis, H. L., (2013) Fundamentals of gifted education: considering
multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
The Council for Exceptional Children (1981). Characteristics of gifted and disabled students
[Table]. In Gifted children with handicapping conditions: a new frontier. Retrieved from
course files SED 850 75.
Mock, D. R., Jakubecy, J. J., Kauffman, J. M. (2002). Special education. Retrieved from:
http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/education/education-terms-and-co
ncepts/special-education
Quinlan, A. M., (2017) Gifted or just plain smart?: teaching the 99th percentile made easier.
Twice Exceptional or 2e. Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Reis, S. & McCoach, D.B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know
and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(152-170).
Sparks, S. D., (2012). Studies shed light on twice exceptional students. Retrieved from:
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/05/08/30gifted.h31.html
16