Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BUCHAREST
2010
CONTENTS
IV. Conclusions
V. References
I. Introduction. Minority Political Representation and Political
Parties. The Hungarian Minority in Europe
1 BIEBER Florian, Minority Participation and Political Parties in Political Parties and Minority Participation,
Friedrich Stiftung Office Macedonia, Skopje, 2008
2 FRIEDMAN Eben, Minority Political Parties in Eastern Europe: Albanian and Magyar Diaspora Parties
Compared, in “Ethnic Mobilization In New Europe” Seminar, Brussels, 21-22 April 2009
even reaching the point of positive discrimination, since ethnic minorities are part of the political
reality and have been since the dismantlement of the empires and the shaping of the modern states,
given that in Europe, the status quo has been modified along history, resulting in non-homogeneous
state populations.
However, on the international level, minority rights as well as a clear definition of
the very minority have not been provided3, nor has a general manner of action has been imposed,
reason for which, across Europe, the states have implemented different polices in relation to
minority rights and the political representation of ethnic minorities.
Moreover, the policies implemented by the states in regard to minorities pertain to
the cultural and educational domains, the issue of political participation and political parties being
sometimes left aside, either without it being possible, such in Bulgaria, or being left to
interpretation, such as in Romania, where the lack of a law in these terms, or the lack of a
constitutional article mentioning it, may be interpreted according to the legal principle: “Where the
law does not dispose, nor should we do so”, meaning either a positive or negative interpretation of
the lack of mention by the legislator being possible.
On an international level, progress has been made towards the enhancement of
political participation of minorities, and here may be stated the Lund Recommendations on the
Effective Participation of National Minorities in Public Life drafted under the authority of the
OSCE High Commission on National Minorities.
Going further, as to provide a framework, the idea o political participation of
minorities, as a necessity enounced by the rather recent developments in the practice of the states
and international organizations, may be understood from two different perspectives, mainly the
perspective of minority rights and that of an argument for democratic stability4.
While approaching the issue from the perspective of minority rights, it may be
argued that the only possible manner to fully ensure the respect of the minority rights and therefore
prevent abuses or discrimination, would be through the direct participation of minorities in the
decision making process, within ethnic minority parties5.
On the other hand, the demand of democratic stability as a factor for the ethnic
minority political representation and participation would result from the “risk” of minorities to be
excluded from the political system, should they not be protected, protection that may be granted
3 POTIER Tim, Regionally non dominant titular peoples: the next phase in minority rights?, Journal on
Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, July, 2001
4 BIEBER Florian, Minority Participation and Political Parties in Political Parties and Minority Participation,
Friedrich Stiftung Office Macedonia, Skopje, 2008
5 BIEBER Florian, Minority Participation and Political Parties in Political Parties and Minority Participation,
Friedrich Stiftung Office Macedonia, Skopje, 2008
only by their direct involvement in the decision making process6.
However, the two arguments issued as to the necessity of the existence of political
participation of minorities and its very efficient functioning does not always superpose and this may
be argued by the very fact that in lack of a homogeneous legislation across the different states of
Europe, minority issues may be differently approached and therefore, their political participation
may appear at times only formal, a presence in the public sphere being guaranteed by constitutions,
but not fully explained and thus enhanced or their influence guaranteed.
Moreover, the variable pertaining to the very size of the ethnic minority in one
European state may play an important role in the weight this minority has in the influence of public
decision-making, since the size may allow a specific minority to function on the public sphere as a
political party capable of passing the election threshold for Parliament and representing an
important actor in the shaping of alliances for the government, such as in the Romanian case.
As thus, the definition of the ethnically based party as delivered by Daniel Horrowitz
may be retained, an ethnically based party being a political party which “derives its support
overwhelmingly from an identifiable ethnic group (or cluster of ethnic groups) and serves the
interest of that group”.7
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the political representation of the most
important minority both in Romania and in Slovakia, mainly that of the Hungarian minority present
in these two countries.
The analysis of the Hungarian minority political representation and its influence in
the public sphere both in Romania and Slovakia shall be delivered from the point of view of the
legal framework that made its existence possible, correlated with the size of the minority and then
analyzing the public policies and program of the party.
The choice of the approach of the analysis of the Hungarian Political Parties both in
Romania and in Slovakia may be justified by the fact that in both countries the Hungarian minority
is the most important one, and this is due to the fact that Slovakia, as well as Transylvania have
been integrant parts of the Habsburg Empire and thus, with its dissolution and shaping of the new
states of Romania and Czechoslovakia, an important part of the Hungarian population that used to
live within the same statal framework has found itself divided among several states, even if its
numbers were considerable.
Moreover, the approach of the Hungarian issue in relation to political representation
may be also justified by the fact that “from a socio-cultural point of view, the Hungarians are
6 BIEBER Florian, Minority Participation and Political Parties in Political Parties and Minority Participation,
Friedrich Stiftung Office Macedonia, Skopje, 2008
7 Daniel Horrowitz's definition of ethnic political party quoted in FRIEDMAN Eben, Minority Political Parties in
Eastern Europe> Albanian and Magyar Diaspora Parties Compared, in “Ethnic Mobilization In New Europe”
Seminar, Brussels, 21-22 April 2009
broadly speaking attractive to those people in the West who are acting as role models and perhaps
more importantly as sources of funds for minority parties, movements, foundations and so on. They
are not illiterate heroin dealers, like some leaders of the Iraqi Kurds, or gun-toting revolutionaries
like the Provisional IRA, but lucid and civilized Europeans, advancing a reasonable political
position in a calm and rational manner”8.
In 1990's when Romania applied for the membership of the Council of Europe, just
three months after the Revolution, the committee in charge with the review of its application
considered that Romania “starts from the lowest possible base in the denial of human rights”
(Council of Europe, 1994)9 and was rated among the worst countries in the world in terms of civil
and political rights, being the least promising for democratic consolidation. Moreover, concerning
minorities rights, the approach of the communist regime was that of an assimilation and denying of
minority rights.
As thus, the starting point for the development and consolidation of minority rights
in Romania has not been a very advanced one, the dismantlement of the old practices and
mentalities being thus necessary as for the provision of a new political approach towards minorities,
and in regards to this aspect, the current situation of minorities has to be approached.
The period following the Revolution was not characterized by immediate progress in
minority rights enhancement but rather by ethnic conflicts in Transylvania region which escaladated
in march 1990 in Targu Mures between Romanians and Hungarians, making Romania the first place
in post-communist Europe where inter-ethnic differences led to deadly conflict (Gallagher 1995)10
Table 13.1 Key indicators for Romania
Total population (millions)a 21.5 (2006)
Urban population (% of total)a 53.9 (2006)
GDP per capita, PPP (US$)a 10,091 (2006)
Unemployment rate (%)b 7.2 (2005)
Ethnic composition (2002 census)c Romanians: 89.5%
Hungarians: 6.6%
Roma: 2.5%
Germans: 0.3%
Ukrainians: 0.3%
Russian-Lipovans: 0.2%
8 Christopher Lord quotation in FRIEDMAN Eben, Minority Political Parties in Eastern Europe> Albanian and
Magyar Diaspora Parties Compared, in “Ethnic Mobilization In New Europe” Seminar, Brussels, 21-22 April
2009
9 RAM Melania H., Romania. From laggard to leader? in Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe edited
by Rachel BERND, BASEES/ Routledge series on Russian and East European Studies, 2009, pages 180-
194
10 RAM Melania H., Romania. From laggard to leader? in Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe edited
by Rachel BERND, BASEES/ Routledge series on Russian and East European Studies, 2009, pages 180-
194
Turks: 0.2%
Other: 2.9%
Sources: a World Bank 2007; b UNICEF 2007; c Institutul National de Statistica 2002.
According to the census in 2002, the Hungarians represent the largest ethnic minority
in Romania, representing a total of 6.6% of the population of Romania and presently the center of
the discussions concerning minority rights and talks of autonomy
11 CALUSER Monica, Minority Participation at Local and National Level in Romania in Political Parties and
Minority Participation, Friedrich Stiftung Office Macedonia, Skopje, 2008
B) The Hungarian Minority in Romania. Political representation
and policies
12 http://www.rmdsz.ro/aboutus.php
elections, proving thus that the unity is not to the extent of consensus. On the other hand, at the
legislative elections, the Hungarian minority has always proven high rates of participation and
voting with UDMR, meeting thus the 5% threshold necessary in order to gain more that 1
guaranteed seat in the Romanian parliament. It has thus proven to be disciplined and consequent in
its voting behavior, discipline that may only be characteristic to the voters of an ethnic party.
To draw up some conclusions as to the statute of the Romanian minorities and more
precisely, the Hungarian one, it may be stated that the Romanian statute of minorities has come a
long way in its evolution and changes are yet to be implemented, given that there is no legal
definition of ethnic minority and thus only the historical minorities are taken into consideration,
while on the basis of the evolution due to the changes involved by the integration in the European
Union and the liberty of circulation, new minority issues may be encountered and needed to be dealt
with according to the respect of the Human rights.
Moreover, the results of today, given the status of minorities and the extended rights
they have concerning the conservation of their identity and possibility of education in their own
language, are also due to the active participation of UDMR in the decision-making process, proving
an ethnic organization capable of fully representing the interests of the people it represents, capable
of negotiation in order to participate in the governance and thus have direct access to the possibility
of influencing the decisions concerning the Romanian minorities, and this may also be due to the
disciplined voters it has.
The independent Slovak Republic was created on the 1st of January 1993 and is
presented in literature as the “culmination of centuries-long struggle for independence, directed first
against the Hungarians, and later against the Czechs”13, adding to this also the manner of
introducing Slovakia as a “young state, but an old nation”.
Throwing a glance upon the struggles after the collapse of communism and within
Czechoslovakia the failure to find a common standing upon the constitutional order of the elites
after 1989 it may also be observed the fact that the resulting nation state did not have a positive
attitude towards ethnic minorities, as was the case of other former communist states in the region.
As such, Slovakia did not start off being an “ethnic democracy”, but the status of
political minorities in Slovakia was rather subjected to an evolution, which, be it positive, was due
13 AUER Stefan, Slovakia. From marginalization of ethnic minorities to political participation (and back?) in
Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe edited by Rachel BERND, BASEES/ Routledge series on
Russian and East European Studies, 2009, pages 195-209
to a great extent to the influence of the European Union.
The position of the ethnic minorities in Slovakia has also been affected by what it is
called “the ethnocentric historiography”14 imposed by the Slovak educational system and the
symbols of the state and those are considered due to the “history wars”15 that have influenced the
perception of the nowadays minorities.
The solution to this approach was that of some intellectuals supporting liberal
nationalism by adhering to the universal liberal values . Moreover, the EU influence has also
encouraged the liberal argumentations.
On the other hand, the coalition between the Social Democracy Party led by Rovert
Fico and the ultra nationalist internationally discredited People's Party- Movement for a Democratic
Slovakia, has triggered a lot of critiques and even the suspension of the Social Democracy Party
from the Socialist Group of the European Parliament.
Moreover, further controversy in 2009 was due to the New Minority Law which sets
out to encourage the use of Slovak in official business in minority areas. Slovak must be used in all
official contacts, including the police, armed forces, fire brigade, postal services and local
government, with a number of exceptions for minority languages like Hungarian. Moreover, some
of the most controversial clauses set fines of up to 5,000 euros (£4,300) for those who continue to
infringe its provisions, after a written warning.16
The Constitution of the Slovak Republic is the supreme legal act in Slovakia’s body
of laws and comprised in it, the most important provisions in what concerns national minorities are
those in the Constitution’s second chapter, which deals with fundamental rights and freedoms, and
those governing the relationship between Slovak and international law.
Even though the constitution does not issue a clear definition of national minority
and Article 12, Paragraph 3 states that “every person has the right to freely decide which national
group he/she belongs to”. In addition to this, it also bears a Preamble that begins as “We, the Slovak
people...” which was the reason for much controversy, the Hungarian minority demanding the
change to “We, the Slovak citizens...”.
14 AUER Stefan, Slovakia. From marginalization of ethnic minorities to political participation (and back?) in
Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe edited by Rachel BERND, BASEES/ Routledge series on
Russian and East European Studies, 2009, pages 195-209
15 AUER Stefan, Slovakia. From marginalization of ethnic minorities to political participation (and back?) in
Minority Rights in Central and Eastern Europe edited by Rachel BERND, BASEES/ Routledge series on
Russian and East European Studies, 2009, pages 195-209
16 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8232878.stm
On the other hand, the constitution enunciates that all ratified agreements pertaining to
human rights shall be superior to the constitutional provisions, should they secure a broader range
of rights and freedoms.
Going further, there is an ambivalence comprised in the constitutional provisions
concerning the status of national minorities- on one hand they are granted equality while on the
other they are guaranteed special rights and freedoms.
The relevant articles stating to this ambivalence is one one hand article 12 on
Equality, emphasizing also the equality principle in relation to other rights as well, such as the right
to own property (Art. 20, Paragraph 1), the right to vote (Art. 30, Paragraph 3), and the equal
rights of children born to married parents and those born out of wedlock (Art. 41, Paragraph 3).
On the special rights conferred to the members of national minorities, Article 34 and
35 state rights that apply exclusively to national minorities, such as the right to master the state
language, the right to establish and maintain their own educational and cultural institutions, the
right to receive information in their native language, the right to use that language in official
contacts with state administration authorities, and the right to participate in administering issues
concerning national and ethnic minorities.
Supplementary guarantees are also stated in Law nr. 350/ 1991 which ennounces the
equal right to have access to elementary and secondary education in Slovak and native language, in
this manner fulfilling what is considered “their national development”.
Also the Law on the Use of Language of Ethnic Minorities from 1999 and the
Regulation nr. 221 issues a list of 656 villages that are to implement education in the native tongue
for the minorities that exceed more than 20% of the total population.
According to the Article 11 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic human rights
agreements ratified by the Slovak Republic have priority over national law, if they secure broader
range of basic rights and freedoms. However, the European Charter on Regional and Minority
Languages is cultural, not a human rights document. In this respect, there are several international
agreements that bear influence over the rights of the Slovak national minorities such as: The
Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities has been ratified bySlovakia on
September 14, 1995. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms from 1950 has been used as a building stone for all European international and internal
norms; The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (1995) is historically
the first document that is primarily focused on the protection of ethnic and national minorities; The
European Charter on Regional and Minority Languages has been signed by Slovak government at
the beginning of the 2001.
Table 14.1 Key indicators for Slovakia
Total population (millions)a 5.4 (2006)
Urban population (% of total)a 56.3 (2006)
GDP per capita, PPP (US$)a 17,827 (2006)
Unemployment rate (%)b 10.4 (2006)
Ethnic composition (2001 census)c Slovak: 85.8%
Hungarian: 9.7%
Roma: 1.7%
Czech: 0.8%
Ruthenian/Ukrainian: 0.7%
Other:: 1.3%
Sources: a World Bank 2007; b Economist Intelligence Unit 2007; c Institute for Public Affairs 2007.
17 FRIEDMAN Eben, Minority Political Parties in Eastern Europe: Albanian and Magyar Diaspora Parties
Compared, in “Ethnic Mobilization In New Europe” Seminar, Brussels, 21-22 April 2009
IV. Conclusions
On a general overview of the attitudes of the two countries, Romania and Slovakia,
towards a common minority, mainly the Hungarian one, some conclusions may be draw.
To begin with, the historical background, even if not exactly the same, given that
Romania had only Transylvania under Austro-Hungarian rule, while the entire Slovak territory was
included, influences the general attitude of the majority population in respect to this population, as
to the extent that radicalism may be present in manifestations.
Going further, even though the premises for political representation in the two
countries differ- in Romania ethnically based parties not being legiferated, while in Slovakia they
exist, the Hungarian minority has organized politically and participated in elections and used its
advantage in numbers in order to influence the process of decision-making, in the process of
obtaining extensive rights, for example in Romania, making a difference also for the other
minorities which are lower in number.
In addition, the political entities representing the Hungarian minority in the two
countries have ethnical based programs, arguing for extensive rights for the minority it represents,
rights that are also argued for in front of the European Union.
On the other hand, opposition is still met by the Hungarians in both countries, in
regards to what is considered to infringe upon the sovereignty of the national state, claims such as
territorial autonomy being yet far to be achieved in Romania, while in Slovakia there are still and
recent problems pertaining to the issue of the usage of minority languages,
It is valid, however, for both countries the fact that there is still room for further
evolutions and it is only to be expected that, within the durable structure of the European Union,
with the extension and development of the European identity and citizenship, the way will open for
more extensive rights and possibilities for the national minorities of these countries and that the
reasonable claims of the political entities that represent them shall be met.
1. REFERENCES