39 BRS 9 a "ae, % < 3 ot 2 boyy rm TOD . Rabbi Shiah T. Director 25 CHALET VIM ROAD, WOODBOURNE NY 12788 ANT DIN’ NA SID oD oy RMP Ib ANT ewyaya Popa Pay avy wb NAA Ny MEAN, Bye yn ww NAN Ba BOD PITY ap APIO AMA PHpT TA OR 39730 Ww JH) OO” Ya AEH OMY ANIM EPDM Tab mM AMO bevy inubo wa nya pam oRMYUNT AinPA myoIA ODT snow (I "oy DRTYOR Yad AbiDn AMD "DI AM AN PPD OrBRY qd S¥ AN PapLoN 33 +? mm napa tow oA pay MTD ON AMR DOPE OD Pr IMD Ty P79 HIM oa TAD TO vIn PAR “MND Oy Toy ADS 1p EMM {F %8 nwa awYaND ¥ BoM TWO yD xMDAD WT OMb w O2 BAVDKY 3a en mew Mba ya WIN Pw! WON Yow M9 ARS MmaAD BAN Noe rons Pie zany wna AH am TTY Yop ADpIAN TY .1-8p "9 POIVD I SpA BY mA Mapa mn wv POTN woDt nea syw> AYN “ary ‘ap nya ova av vem waa navP +m oA yb YD MAD HvD TH “enw iewa OvS Kana Tw ~O B-wD ALIS TAX AM OT na AMM voy ny way 2p "Oa A’? MO AM RINK AWN nwa ADT HDD HD IoD mend aK “3 mend Pa pond 3°> pay ‘om be wb erporoT ow ean Brera nrwyy myn 3"3 9 wr man m-T3hDI-ow MO TA AI PN OD vy TH PH AENA w MoxpD nD oy “wawT THI BH aN x noyBb Mn TIE 7M PT PR PSpMA w3> Tob WH DME Oy OMIPM TMD QD YP IT pos mM APR AIN AYNDDS AYOMY DrpONDT ora new (2 Bey ee bran nhoaw W"2."o abe MED OMOK Na AND Py OND FVD TBP PIM aN BT NOT MPH N- R-OP %O KT OrwIAD New YHA 2° 292 FMM ok BU Roy saya a (vor ana KONA) ores MTNA APIA PavwNa OBR AIA IT S238 OM TE we ONAI AME MaMAY MovBn BMWA Sow ONDY SRW ON ANT Way BNA NWT? mt OND bw THE MW "Mn WY BrDyD Seay ys Bn’ Pan mt yoURD AYN woRTE MITIA So Fahy pron by na Bm RUwS 29M IED Im AW PN punks rash oroanmama-aKm W790 -n Br TT ADD OM ALDpra ynpe bo koe monn Pra mM pra XY nay Mann PAVIA TaN MAT sin x} oD Tas? ORD TIA wR PAA oT DA ALI Poy} wr MVD spya pr ovo wb@ mbna nrvva 3°x) ow TPT? OK AINA PA BT NDT son xb veavhn sr yn wT pT bam Yea y¥DD awa TAP NOK APM xm pyar joan ton px oh Dobe Dw nrvyaT wa PID PRET NOY CH pam ype ann 9B onww> haw OITA wy? TrwW 99 OAA MON ON? ox My OV OW TAAPHK ODT woyyP Hw beers ope Now AMD Mano bona paw obo bw nvm Toy RYBL Vm AT PR KI OY av OAyD TERT paboaraonnnd omy mawmAp we nyya an 2"N wy AMEE A INT pesimbrn mira vem pea px ay MN wD MI» YorBKP savPDA TH OD (abonand row om vA) BTA oy Jprmonn wena aan yD BVyHA aa "ADT IIT oO" KITT W'DDH CY fy pave ano aan yay enerawN AMD KD NPD woIHY xHW MPA dy nd? sees wb 122 m1 xo moa MPVR WD 3° TMDBON Ma PRD TTT OT pia phab on nbvoan sx TA v¥pRD woNDTY Nore ww RR TenU-BUN pinay? nbd Tras 3°3 pry sews 34 Trp AMDB I RW APTA MDD own mnvayn xa ape xo a3 PIV OTTAD NW OTH? Wasp DIV sim sia etn mm wown Arye yes owhoD MeaBR PNW PR TT OIwIA INN yy) ayn oD RW XPT PINT wUdEY Aw VTE? ODD VA! AT NIN p39 AND) PADI PWT 2D WI DARA NEDA "Ow [WN YH 2"D evga vein aww? ayo paar xprt who °yaT 9° ErpOTeAT KANT NIN avn ayn nayp MIA TATRI WV wD wo vNRD OIpD OW xy MoD winen ne ye PVD PRWA PINAY AT VD AY 7D INVA TT ALY (H snnx 771 BND OYPDA WIR 21 PDH OTK TVD MND TAP Vy TE wd Spr prob han pk} HR OM BIPBA wee AAP MADD TY w” OR YK OAT MD {D377 RD KON BD YTD Toby Yan RY TD PAK amen Ye xb ND TaD TE MYDD ANN MBIT TRA HOW ( ons oy mapa Fpova MWD Maa POT TROY |W YAM MOK WIT AN promi nibs arya 2°30 aby ANAM Ve aT RD 93? NUNPY PEND sways > v3) MND BITE IVD MONT gonna nowy ane b30 ON pow T1179 BDV TAT OOTY NOW (> yanp ara3'3 Rew "a wBONA dy Pa paA by Pa Tay Breda wD [pe monpo apo2 on bdo spew wx on 99 VoNVAY paw PRB TD IKsom moto} na 79 -wW pra WA aM THR NED PT IPP aD PAB wm nn xb 3°39 3° ovdona x ANON PY oN Tab apa naan we paw ieweaan myDw dead bmp aMpD BY MwA TIT Oe yyman ny 9°35 mba born ona "x MPD AA ANND OMI UODIAWhY depen orxvT dy na MOL TAY TapN*D PHBE dear doaRDO-M 317 OD geo) nagT BIEDW A" Ke NMS RIM "ab AIA TPA Brow EXpdanAd Semana nyay myn apis doom arpa ea) re Ow KO TT RD B°ns O9vD "IMD Bay TTI Soy mans tap mawp vain pe uP popmaa oREPY OWA PVD ‘anama woan> Yan > by nba ry MAN TanDN ANA nN OT} wr oNwIN xrow Peers prund v"dp 7 AD AMBND RTA YrTMaNy Tt 90 ap muawDA NOW °B> YooR on ABT ANY ANAT BONN (a> 22 POP DR ADR YBa wy bar poO NN OWA mnD} wT WY P2 Pond ‘yo wenn npwe2 bax ovens OnaTm pon Dns pay on PyPD wm OD gem any> wT ame 97 aT a2 TT RinMT “3 AANA APD IK wh SpoR yam vingD Wx be wT yanse2 KUNE ¥eTIA TaN ew TAA KOT aN san wr 7a99 TayD VIDE BY AW Thon AW MUP MTT AnD P's woud ‘wen whap paxw xx nptoni3a bn a ow by mA? MMB AVN wR prep Pama ROWS JV OPO aM dapMn sow wInBD WADA HK maby pon anemic a9 wind sha pms ppm shy Ser pma enn a3 mat waAW MK? (Pay Mba) O-M K ¥"DD A"BO an bx mnian2 qnwdn nana 31) Toon ABby a Nw Nb eT MAN ETT kup 2 DyoTY MERE MINA JD PieaD YT oP Pe amy os He PT Syv2 MABE IK PROD OAT Aw AMAT yy PR’ UT TH AND Roy nnbo naa by 03 vata at gy NoMa I by May VATS TP oY TBR AD wR WS AM ITY | OX wbx AUN waA YO AR UB OW aeyNAD a AY eer ya cmoM nova ora RVD WENA bx DSMwDD TVA Abbe nvr navn ov2 BND xwB ENN ROY WR 9 MAO AN be TORT bina pp wean amp NWA Po 19 MAKE ABD HMB MA OHWTP b> yon viavy 9 Syw miaan sp Ta npbw nya by ven RHR OyDTE mad pman ary ayy xy sabe TyNDD mA wy prday mn bw Ab we WP xnerne naw biden “> ya wy yan Ady ATED Tow xt MND ‘IND PxT ma vay AUR UTP MW Mav!N ATINy We MA bo MED vw + Tew ox ow 52 ye Aw >On ten en omy mean 12 wn EMNDY Mey MME MPND ApwAN DIpH *T TAK Seay O11 by Tam AIwY prov Pr PSY AN AK OT by Sen -m 90 2-0 Yered Tort Tym ow mary wy 12 OID) ONIN OK MIMD 3 1) ww OD pom x70 Dw "0 Bw IeRS po bray MIT enn ren me nnn mena aw ww POT IT VND ren mow pr wiem 2a ND owD ony 27 HT Parra KNICD 2v ran nA Pom tp De ren Tod wore ween mn, oy em wx OM Ya2%a OMEN MN Owe PAD ye 273 Pn oneARV PL VA Hon MAID nye RABBI SHIAH T. DIRECTOR mea ab sea ep pany aipen sin oe ips enpAa Dyn i Sy TIpna mins poyn WD xsuTeDY pon Uy) net Te od Spt 25 CHALET VIM ROAD, WOODBOURNE NY 12788 Sivan 5765 Dear Rabbi Feinstein | 24 ie Enclosed please find a scholarly article on the subject of ERUVIN, Explained clearly, is the absolute fact, ERUVIN can be established in Brooklyn and Manhattan. BIASED ON FACTS STATED THERE ANY PROHIBITION AGAINST ERUVIN 1S NONSENSE. Therefore, your asinine, stupid, statements against ERUVIN, signature on proclamation, and doltish letter, are uncalled for. You have become the laughing stock of all versed in this subject. Respect for your your father, of blessed memory, and your self respect demands that you refrain from expressing opinions against all the holy sages of Israel, in past generations, and in our generation. No one is interested in your fathers ruling, egainst the Shulchan Aurach, and all poskim. Trying to impress the ignorant public that there is even 1% validity to his ruling, is outrageous, shocking, scandalous, and appalling. ye P4y'3 Ao aie oe P.S. It's very strange. You signed on a document urging people not to follow rulings of the Shulchan Aurach and all poskim. Against the explicit ruling of your father. Who stated: one can follow these rulings. Even if he did not openly state this. Nevertheless, it is obvious. You signed on this document with non believers in Torah. Their ultimate gall, telling people not to follow rulin , gs ot the Shulchen Aurech ond ell poskia: and, their guts, ia duafounding, and astonishing.22 pop yya ym pra ayn BYUn apy 'b pee 72 aeybe Tat PNT Bova aT WMD TID? sam -popnan pue ma AD pre (V7) VN aKa VND >"vD PIV aha Den popra Fe Ore awa aw 79 PRE yD o> probe ‘pp nD OID PNP RO PEM WPA TENN 30ND OED OPE hoe) som snosh amas} ota fina wa eK MR Ona APD we banat op b2a Pepa KIVA /D PO PR OWI T MID 422 TOK mm vaT 7 TaN] ME DR pr OAD AIAN ONE LD PD APIO 49 bm am by pm navn ond ww Popna VF Morn onbapy *voDDOE PaenA Dyn AVION OF OMawAD PHT Ten ory aw am nysomn yop Mawes MK Tad WT awa Teown $3 ow oy QR DS OWI MUPRIK OoN AD) OM BEN bs DM GUN OW kD nun} Ovo" KawWEA ANY pa pwN wow BK OMIT rad nor omy Teta AD OTK Ornynd bax OrERTA MWD PPD IC naga ry bax phpnas adm wa on ma Oe ORAM ba Ye Popa Ve YAS MACK MNDBA PINE ATED! Wa wr pera da mera PR Avedy AcyRD xb Yax Taw bapy crn wher pr TKD awe vy IR PPD TD nw TE ww popna Ys MEER MurnaA AMA Mad onaN2 VI move Amen mioway b> mwa Yoh oT wy ey? |Iw TAP Deen o'r ang Tw) dem nora $3 ppoa ON men vy swap AA TN eh AR aM yee aD RL ompD oA MWD (pavey cay'h min) Fey PAI 3D) (BD 70) parry Mapa TK pM pmesa mana nm obere obra pha ary pear wach vem So cob exe) vm op andy pxe GME 33 Meno AID WA MoH PR ea “op MAGI Ye WPT EMT omata mond teK 9at pon way9 Mazen maT Taw) pr TAKS AMAA YN PT PypMay S77 yma 2 71 7b RD WAP? DIND WI ReID_ XIII ASE? AIDA AR_PY VT Nba aw Wye? nen “nt ox o7ey, 91s bp swIpd wo MesaAND PLAT NON MAID INyeet RABBI SHIAH T. DIRECTOR rea nd a 2 pany wipy sin Se wip> venpAa yA ID Sy TIPNA Tn} pawn TNE KoEDe so FUN Fe eT DR Hd Supt 25 CHALET VIM ROAD, WOODBOURNE NY 12788 FOU M9 % pil amy Rabbi Aron Shecter Camp Morris P.0.B, 81 Woodridge, N Y 12789 Dear Rabbi Shecter: I am still waiting for your comments on literature about the eruv in Brooklyn that I sent you. If you don't agree with what [ write please tell me the reason why. Lucid comments in my writings in favor of eruvin deserve comment. In my opinion they are undisputable. If you feel they are not. Please tell me why. Enclosing a letter published in a prestigious Torah journal in the Holy City of Jerusalem twenty four years ago. Seen and reviewed by Torah scholars there: and in other cities. These lucid comments are non refutable. However, if you have comments on this letter. Please send them to me a) wip VAD apo RAID?) ne Gi WW na ri 1's! 9aNppLat IO MAID Mw RABBI SHIAH T. DIRECTOR many a ep pany sips sn by vIpd venpna peer we by TIwNS sins poyT TD KeUTYDY SOT sayt et 17 ee 9d Sone 25 CHALET VIM ROAD, WOODBOURNE NY 12788 re Rabbi Feivel Cohen Cong. Tomchei Torah 1966 Ocean Avenue Brooklyn, N Y 11210 Ay 25 5766 Dear Rabbi Cohen: Enclosed please find copies of recent publication. So you can discuss it with other Torah scholars. After reading enclosed publication: and discussing it with other Torah scholars. Please tell me the reason, you are against establishing eruvin: and, are actively protesting against their establishment. py) 127% px79n) "2 3} ufo ond wre “6 10ANPP NOM MAID Ite RABBI SHIAH T. DIRECTOR ead ea es pany sipyT ain Ye “wip penpAD een wy Sy TIDND MM ELT Tins xMMeDw nop UM et Tek 9d Sept 25 CHALET VIM ROAD, WOODBOURNE NY 12788 yoo Adar 5760 Dear Editor: Purim (Eruy Shabbos), the Boro Park eruv was broken by ignorant, corrupt, vicious, degenerate, vandals.It was Fixed, before Shebbos, by diligent supervisers of this enw. Before, the next Shabbos, it was broken again: and, Fixed before Shabbos. Last Monday night it was broken again. However, those on patrol, saw him breaking the erwv. We willl not say whet happened to him. Let this serve as a vamung to anyone contemplating such acts. Our eruv is under constant supervision. There are also qoyim on call to fix this eruv. In the event it needs to be fixed on Shabbos. There is also a beck up eruv. This insures it's ubmet security. Our erw is under the supervison of leading scholars in our generation. There is no ore eqal to then in our generation. Aryone with questions concerning our erw can ask these eminent holy sages. They will be ‘most. haopy to answer all questions. They have lectured extensively on this subject. Tapes of their lectures are available. Many have written on this sibjest. Their works are availeble for all to study. In all, thirty four (34) Rabbinin, leaders of the most prominent congregations in Baro Park, wrote letters,or signed, a proclination, in favor of the Boro Park eruv. No one fas any right to dispute the reliability of these pronenent scholars who approve the Boro Park Erw. If they feel their ruling is erroneous. They should discuss it with then. To date this has not been done. Because, they carnot conduct an intellegen discussion with prominent. scholars. 1 know. Because, I talk with then, ‘Also, during the past year. I published sixteen books on the subject of eruvin in Brooklyn. These works were widely publicized in Brooklyn, and in Eretz Yisroel: and, joyfully received by scholars in our generation, Yet ro one against the erwv comented on them. Because, they have nothing to comment. They carrot deny self evident. truths. Cheb Vo (Be BF "b. reo ear... Enclosed is a booklet, "SELECTED ESSAYS", published twenty years ago, where letter from Reb Mashe Feinstein, of blessed memory, was conscientiously, scrupulously, and carefully, discussed by the undersigned. Copy of this letter appears there(see pages 24-25-26-27). Before it was published in Igros Moshe (pert 4 letter 88). This booklet was republished last year. His letter is also discussed in other works by the undersigned. Published last year. Therefore, statement in your letter published in The Jewish Press that I ‘onveniently ignore" this letter. Is a lie. Because it was cited. and discussed, in detail, many times, by the undersigned. You had no way of knowing this. Nevertheless, you had an obligation to judge me fairly. We never met. We don't know each other. Therefore, why did you judge me wrongly, and assume, I was trying to fool the public: and, ignored this letter? Why did you publicly slander a person? Without verifying if a letter you are sending a newspaper for publication is correct. You had a moral obligation to do this. If you had a question on what I wrote. You had an obligation to contact me. Before sending a "letter to the editor". Before one publishes statements against anyone. He has an obligation to contact him. This is his obligation according to Jewish Law. Your statement that Reb Moshe, of blessed memory, never gave permission to anyone to make an. eruv in Brooklyn, is erroneous. Because, he states clearly in afore mentioned letter that one can rely on the ruling of the Shulchan Aurach: and, make an eruv. This 18 obvious. Even if he did not state this. He understood, very well, he is not greater, in grasping, and understanding, Torah Law, than Reb Yoseph’ Ciaro, of blessed memory, who wrote the Shulchan Aurach. Whose rulings have been binding on Jewish People for 500 years. Reb Moshe, of blessed memory, clearly understands, his opinion is null and void, against the ruling of the Shulchan Aurach. Therefore, he also clearly understands, one cannot be condemned for following rulings of the Shulchan Aurach, and leading poskim. Even if he rules against them. May I call your attention to letter on page 24 of enclosed booklet where he clearly states: " one has permission to do as he understands " . He has no obligation to listen to his ruling. Reason for not citing letter from Reb Moshe,of blessed memory, even though well known to the undersigned, is because in a short " letter to the editor " it was unnecessary. Purpose of this short letter was not to discuss his views in detail. You determined from what he wrote, after looking at a map of Brooklyn, that one is forbidden to make an eruv in Brooklyn. Which is true. However, the undersigned, learned from what he wrote. 1. His ruling is against the Shulchan Aurach. 2, One can choose to follow ruling of the Shulchan Aurach and make an eruv. 3. iis ruling is also against all leading poskim. 4. One can follow their ruling and make an eruv. Therefore, there was no reason to cite this letter. Because, this was already stated in my " letter to the editor ". Declaring, Reb Moshe's, of blessed memory, ruling to forbid making an eruy in Brooklyn, against. all leading poskim, and the Shulchan Aurach, is absolute,and impeccable. Is, in my opinion, like saying he is retarded. This attribute cannot be ascribed to the qreat sage of the previous generation May T call your attention to letter in Igros Moshe (part 8 Jetter 19), written to @ woman from Boro Park, where hy states that there is no zgshus harabim mdiorisa in our time. This letter, originally published in “Am Ha'Torah", states that it written toe woman fore Bora Park,” ® Ha'Torah", states that it was Sincerely, Grete 12swomya Rabbi Shiah T. Director AND PYIT NIN WAV YY? 1540 57th Street em wx psbA 90%” 190 NBA Brooklyn, N.Y. 11219 “rn nn nia yaraw pars pn mAM NNT (718) 435-2269 22,p9PN2 Dear +++ Please be advised for over twenty years, no one made intelligent comments: against, over twenty books published by the undersigned. These publications were praised, accepted, and entered, into the vast literature of works by Torah scholars, through out the generations. Torah Scholars praised these prestigious works: and, studied then. These prestigious works were published with my address. Anyone desiring to comment on then had my address in front of them. All intelligent comments are welcone. 1 have an absolute right to disagree with any lorah scholar in our generation: or, in the previous generation. After stating clear non refutable proofs to my position Term "non refutable" is used, Because, what 1 wrote has never been disproved. Even though, some things were ridiculed by the ignorant. Ihey were never refuted. Wallow in your ignorance. Intelligent Torah scholars, rejoice with knowledge gained, when Learning, and pondering, on my many works. You, sell trefa fish, without reliable supervision. Because, one who actively protests against CRUVIN IS RETARDED. Mare, so, one who’ destroys eruvin, Therefore, supervision on your products is completely unreliable. Obviously, you are unable to understand works published by the undersigned: nor, are you capable of making intelligent comments on them. Therefore, do not voice opinions on matters of Jewish Law, reserved for Torah scholars. Also, please be advised. Many comments on Igros Moshe, published by the undersigned, were published when Red Moshe, of blessed memory, was alive. He saw them: and, did not comment on them. ile understood that I have a positive, unquestionable, right to make these comments. when questioned, hr replied. What difference dacs it make to me if someone refuses to accept my rulings. If you are concerned about controversial people. You should remove all volunes of Igros Moshe from the Bais Midrash. There was no one more controversial in the previous generation. All Torah scholars, in his generation, disputed many of his rulings. Namely: 1. His ruling permitting a low micitzah in shuls. Even though one can see women attending the shul. Even when they attend shul with uncovered hair. He was the only ore sho ever permitted this. Since we received our holy Torah. All Torah scholars opposed this ruling. 2. Artificial insemination. He was the only one who per this. All scholars in his generation opposed this ruling. 4. Cholov Akum. He is the only one who wrote, and published, letters permitting this 4, Prohibiting establisment of eruvin in Brooklyn. He is the only one who published letters forbidding their establisment. All leading poskim, from previous generations: and cminent poskim, in our generation, here and in Eretz Yisroel, who wrate on this subject, completely disregarded his ruling. He also stated, in published letters, one is forbidden to protest against those who do not follow his ruling, against the Shulchan itedAurach, and all leading pskim. This absolute ruling is completely ignored by those against the eruv. 5. He ruled against the time honored method of Bris Mille described in the Shulchan Aurach. Followed by all Jews for thousands of years. His ruling is disputed by all poskin. These are only a few of his rulings against all leading poskim. There are more discussed in works of our sages. You should also remove the chumashim, and shas, with Rashi. Because, Tosfos, Ramban, and others disagree with him on many matters of Jewish Law. You should also remove the shas from the Bais Midrash. Because, Abaya argues with Rova, Rav Ashi argues with Ravina etc.. Also, remove the mishnaos. Becaues, Reb Mayer argues with Reb Yehudah etc. ‘You are a "nut job". You don't know what you are talking about. Your mind is fogged. §. vector 14(718) 435-2269 sRDpYy yt oT Maw Wyw? RABBI SHIAH T. DIRECTOR, arta nb wa Th parvy ype TIN dy rwIp> D‘nDya {eT ‘ip by TON ny ,poyn Tiny AMnyDw TdT JAD) HT TTT wR HOD DY 1540 S7th ST. BROOKLYN, N'Y 11219 26 Sivan 5761 vos Rabbi Lipa Margolis Yeshiva Torah Temema 555 Ocean Parkway Brooklyn, NY 11218 Dear Rabbi Margolis: It has come to my attention that students from your yeshiva, are tearing the eruv, established in the Kensington community. These criminal acts are forbidden according to Jewish Law. They are also forbidden according the laws of the United States Government. This is a serious crime. In our free country, everyone has the right to follow his religion, as he pleases. Would you break into homes of Jewish People, who have Christmas trees, and destroy them? You understand clearly. No one has the right to touch any ones property. You might go to their homes and explain that this is not proper conduct for a Jew. But, you would not force your views on them. You can go to rabbonim involved in constructing eruvin: and, discuss the matter with them. However, forcing your views on others, more, so, before discussing the matter with them, is uncivilized. More, 50, young children, who know nothing about the subject of eruvin, who destroy eruvin, are completely insane. This is a public disgrace for your fine yeshiva. @ecause, some degenerates, who are obviously mentally retarded people, and gangsters, who say one can destroy someone's property, more, so, public property. Does not mean this is allowed. Yeshiva students must have no part in these criminal acts. This is a disgrace for your fine yeshiva and Torah. Enclosed please find literature on the subject of eruvin for your teview. Please read this literature carefully One enjoys, and holds, the absolute privilege to follow rulings of Hgaon Reb Chiam erlin, and other holy sages, expressed in this literature, and other literature, known to those who establish eruvin. No one can rightfully protest against them. More, so, children learning in your yeshiva, who never studied the subject. Their criminal acts are only a display of ignorance. Protesting against their rulings, disgraces these holy sages, and the Almighty, who decreed in His holy Torah: rulings of the majority of Torah scholars stands. The undersigned wrote a detailed essay last year clearly explaining this concept. Basis of our holy Torah. This is not the first time in Jewish history that the majocity of Torah scholars arqued with another scholar. We always rule: opinions of the majority stands. [Ff you have any comments. I will be most happy to hear them. Sincerely, Chel Vo Fie Oe is4 ANVPLAVNT Hon MAID IM RABBI SHIAH T. DIRECTOR ma ah ma 9 yarn IPN Mn Le ‘oipd Donna [peri Sy Tiers sins pyr und xmAyow mos sav are gr we re9d borat 25 CHALET VIM ROAD, WOODBOURNE NY 12788 ye Yorr [ro Vaad L'Tikun Eruvin of Greater Flatbush: Tn God athe, Almighty help you in your Fight against non believers in God and His Torah who are against establishing eruvin. There SF car URS ecco cote one halves) Gighianeery Wert rit laws ea gusatel val ocah:Handssonel wholdcesltnocwaneeres only one law in our noly Torah. Both deny the validity of Torah law. mec’iously, my comments on your publications were sent to yous fay you be blessed for elucidating this subject. However, one main point eludes mostly ever) one who writes ros rag Subject. Namely, Reb Moshe Feinstein, oF blesses memory, fo. ik, {hE only one who wrote on the subject of craven. More, poskime pg vel ruling, against the Shulehan Aurachy snd all Poskin, is unheard of in the history of the Jesisn people. hy those writing on laws of eruvin, have m septey block, oreo Lon obligation to cite his views, sng explain them, amazes me. This was expressed in booklets written by the undersigned. Ube) jectl comet ne: elan\eerud) wackceteblTehcuMiny nese cries in bone neat 1908) approved of by seven leading schol in that this cub pect ey Meter and published, detailed discussions on Enis subject. Their erudite, super genius, analysis, and ruling fave never been logically refuted. Therefore. any ruling against them is plain nonsense. Other rulings of great sages, of blessed memory, even though ree commenting on New York or Brooklyn, nevertheless, apply to Brooklyn as well. This is not the place ta eiay all their rulings. Ty ath out te these publishing booklets on eruvin in Brooklys publicize a leaflet, and distribute it dour to door in SRT eee eating a ineblgMochayagerr sina ere against the Rhulehan Aurach, and all poskim, something wahoard of in the pistory of the Jewish people: therefor. no one nee any obligation to follow his ruling. ioe enet Tl eoeUmsvoulaSQUUTO08 tvs (cneerer (erent (4 advertisement ina newspaper and more effective. If this is done every few monthes. You will win the battle. ue St >AND PLAT NON MAID Ine RABBI SHIAH T. DIRECTOR wand ams pany oipyt sin Se wipd venpAs (PEA 1D Sy JIDHA Sins poyT Tiny KANYDY A> SHYT eT ON Hd Sept 25 CHALET VIM ROAD, WOODBOURNE NY 12788 Sivan 5765 In last analysis, all those leading the fight against eruvin are apikursim who don't believe in GOD and His Torah. Reb Moshe is only an excuse. Because, he ruled explicitly, one should not protest against eruvin. Because, his ruling is against the ruling of the Shulchan Aurach, and all poskim. Non protest means, besides not harassing those who make eruvin, no posters in the street, or leaflets in the mail, and no advertisements in newspapers, against eruvin. More, so, a despicable, vile, and wretched, advertisement stating: those who make eruvin are "Reform Jews" Any one who asked him, if they can make an eruv, was told, they can make one. This is stated openly in Igaros Moshe (part 4 letter 87), in reply to the Rabbonim of Flatbush. He alsa told this to Rabbi Menasha Klein, as record:d in his well known, published discourse, on this subject. Reb Moshe saw it, and never disputed, what he wrote. Even if some protesting against eruvin ere Roshei Yeshiva, they are still squalid, despicable, individuals. As the Rosh says ( elall 21): in the tine of the Sanhedren they would be put to death. V7town 731 3" WNT NIWA "yD myn by menn ,nyT) oy onenn) ayo AWW TW OVD oN xovyn a"y IIT Awa XD ON DN PI ov. IPR ATI YY DIN ,vIWPT SPO Nap TD WX OX yora worn) myn 3D OX SPPW MPP OII7 Nenn ay PANNA mw 77 MAW wpa .ayD orK mawn van> jo Jad ren ron TAR AN ,oNYY) ,OAMAT AKAY MD omna7 Yy Pw XD INNA yor. PI mn bw ada yn. AYN myn vy ONIN SUPT NT Paw Wye?