Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract The increasing penetration of renewables at TSO cross-border exchange, usually being measured either at the
and DSO level, requires more complex solutions for ancillary controlling point - e.g. the order of AGC (Automated
services. Currently, in large interconnected power systems, there Generation Control) in the TSOs (Transmission System
are various solutions for their calculation. The ancillary services Operator) EMS/SCADA (Energy Management System /
for load balancing control or for cross-border power exchange Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition), or by measuring
are currently calculated based on SCADA measurements or on with local SCADA the real-time data [1, 2]. Our studies show
TSOs AGC order. In this paper authors propose alternative that ancillary services can be calculated with high accuracy by
solutions for calculating, with high accuracy, the ancillary using metrology energy meters which use 1-minute load
services and quality of service by using legally enforced
profiles (LP01), with the advantage of legally enforced results
metrology meters using 1-minute load profiles. These solutions
are based on several exploratory tests performed within the
(due to metrology), with high accuracy (always under 0.5%
Romanian power system and on various simulations. Moreover, for our use-cases) and with preservation of equal values
the traded quantities on energy and balancing markets can be between the meter measurements and transacted energies on
exactly retrieved on the metrology meter measurement energy and balancing markets. Moreover, Quality of Service
trustable through IEC accuracy compliance, thus bringing high (QoS) can be also assessed and the method applies also for
transparency and trust for partners. The method applies also for aggregated services provided by Virtual Power Plants (VPPs)
aggregated services provided e.g. by Virtual Power Plants.
II. ANCILALRY SERVICES CALCULATION
Index Termsancillary service (AS), metrology meter, 1-minute This chapter presents the main aspects related to the
Load Profile (LP01), quality of service, Virtual Power Plant.
calculation of the ancillary services. Figure 1 illustrates the
communication scheme of the Automatic Generation Control
I. INTRODUCTION (AGC) between the control center of the Transmission
Electricity markets have been highly developed in the last System Operator (TSO) and the Dispatchable Unit (DU). The
years and new web based platforms have been implemented to variables shown in the figure are explained in chapter III.
increase the competition among participants, while various
technical rules were established to enhance network security.
In particular, the balancing market was created to manage the
acquisition and deployment of energy reserves for load-
frequency control. With the increased penetration of
intermittent renewable energy sources (RES) in both
transmission and distribution networks, there is an increased
need for effective balancing solutions which need also to be
calculated in an accurate, transparent and trustable way. This
is also needed because the amount of necessary balancing
services is increasing in time, due to high RES penetration.
Just for example, in the Romanian power system, during
windy periods, the volatile generation from RES may reach up
to 50% of the total load, which ask for higher volume of Figure 1. Calculation of ancillary services using various methods
balancing services compared in the past. In Portugal this value
has already reached a maximum value of 100%. A. Data sources for ancillary services calculation
The measurement of provided services and the quality of While the control signals are sent from TSO to DU, by
service do not have a unique method over countries and for SCADA, the ancillary service (AS) delivered by DU can be
calculated with several possible methods:
The work has been funded by the Sectorial Operational Program Human
Resources Development 2007-2013 of the Ministry of European Funds through
the Financial Agreement POSDRU/159/1.5/S/132397; part of this work has
been done in the frame of the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under the Nobel Grid project grant agreement No
646184.
a) by using real time data from local SCADA of the DU, with based on prequalification tests performed by the TSO. The
a typical sampling rate of 1 or 2 seconds, depending on the real QoS may be worse depending on various real time
hardware technology (M_SCADA); operation aspects, varying from human error to defective
b) by using the integration of AGC command, called also transducers, which are not subsequently checked. On the
control order CO(t), at the TSO level (M_AGC) contrary, the LP01 based calculation allows an easy post-
c) by using local meter with 1-minute load profiles (M_1m); factum analysis of QoS, from next minute to next day,
depending on the needs of the TSO [4].
Calculation based on local data source as delivered
service measured with local SCADA (method a) and ordered C. Checking the balance between traded energies on energy
service in AGC based on CO(t) (method b) are the main and balancing markets compared with the recorded meter
current used methodologies for this purpose. data a commercial issue
In this paper is proposed a new method, based on meters As explained earlier, the current procedures for calculation
of the ancillary services may lead to large errors. This brings
data source (method c) (M_1m). For assessing the validity of
also difficulties in checking the energy balance at various
this method, we consider also an ideal measurement at the
measurement point of within certain network areas, for both
DU local level, where measurements are done with highest electricity gross market and balancing market.
accuracy (near zero error), which we mark as
M_ideal_etalon. The two meters are shown in figure 1 with During some commercial hours the errors may be as low
dotted red circles, as they are the subject of our analysis. as 0.5% (which is acceptable), but during dynamic periods the
It has been already reported in [3] that the accuracy of errors may increase up to 1 to 5%, depending on the specific
instrumentation measurements from meters are at the same resource that provide the service, which is no longer
level with the measured energy, which makes the meter a acceptable for commercial reasons.
much solid source of real-time data, instead of SCADA data, This inconvenience can be easily overcome by using
thus making it a better alternative to (method a). Furthermore, metrology meters, which are capable of providing reliable
the billing meters have usual accuracy of 0.2S for large data, as meters are subject to legally enforced certificates.
generators or for tie-lines and they are always connected to
Figure 2 illustrates an example that shows the way in
instrumentation windings of CTs/VTs. As this local real-time
which the LP01 method employed for ancillary services
data is the most accurate which can be obtained, for practical
calculation preserves perfect match between the energies sold
reasons we consider this source as providing etalon meter on the energy markets, including the balancing market, and
measurements for the ideal ancillary service calculation the energy recorded by the meter. This is possible because the
M_ideal_etalon. LP01 profile are calculated exclusively based on data from
Measurements made with real-time data from SCADA metrology meters, without mixing with data from SCADA
(method a) will inherently produce higher errors in ancillary (source a) or based on power orders at AGC (source b).
services calculation, due to the fact that usual SCADA
provides measurements with errors of at least 0.5% (Remote
Terminal Units- RTUs, Bay Control Units - BCUs), thus we
infer that their cumulated errors for calculating ancillary
services are at least 0.5% higher than those with
M_ideal_etalon.
Authors have also analyzed several sets of data received
from the AGC system (method b), consisting in power control
orders CO(t) sent to the dispatchable units. This analysis
revealed that, statistically, the order-based method has higher
errors than the method based on LP01 data, and the difference
may change during each commercial interval (e.g. one hour) Fig.2 Preserving energy balance between markets and real meter readings.
based on CO(t) specific evolution. Method b is therefore
considered less accurate than method a, as in principle it Energy metering using LP01 profiles helps matching, with
measures orders for services and not executed services. very good accuracy, the energy components supplied within
the electricity markets with the energy records by metrology
With data source from our proposed method c, the meters, trustable through the legally enforced IEC accuracy
ancillary service is calculated by using 1-minute energy load- compliance. For this reason, this method can be generalized at
profiles recorded in the meter. This is the main method which national level or even to monitor the cross-border trades.
is further proven in the paper to be accurate for calculating
various ancillary services, based on legally enforced data In order to show that the LP01 based method can be
from metrology meters, with errors being under 0.5% for the widely used for calculating the energy supplied as ancillary
studied cases further presented. service, let us consider two relevant cases: a) the f-P
secondary control, and b) the non-mandatory voltage control.
B. Quality of Service (QoS)
Furthermore, the demand response (DR) is considered for
Usually the quality of the ancillary services provided by the tertiary frequency control by aggregating multiple small
various dispatchable units is not verified, but are estimated entities with the support of LP01 profiled.
III. THE SECONDARY FREQUENCY CONTROL SERVICE Moreover, we showed that due to difference between P
The principle of calculating the f-P secondary control corresponding to the control order CO(t) and the effective P
contribution is based on the upward secondary control energy execution, the two curves are different and that a Quality of
(USCE) and downward secondary control energy (DSCE) Service (QoS) can be computed each minute, bringing a QoS
(Figure 3). These energies are calculated by integrating the assessment in the same paradigm, as presented in fig. 5.
difference between the actual power (Net active power) and
the nominated (notified) power Pf(T) approved for operation.
In Romania, the notified power denotes the total power of a
generator corresponding to a certain dispatching interval T
accepted for generation on the energy market, and the
secondary regulation band SRB is a symmetrical band around
the notified power Pf(T) approved for operation in interval T.
The Net active power Pnet(t) depends on the order CO(t) from
AGC and has an ideal evolution based on the formula :
Pnet(t) = Pf(T) + CO(t) x SRB(T) (1)
where CO(t) is in the range (-0.5 .. 0.5) or (-50% .. +50%).
Fig. 5: Quality of Service (QoS) assessment
It is a different integral for the upper part and for the lower
part (USCE and DSCE). Since normally the meters are not
capable of integrating P, but only P, a different calculation
approach is required. In the paper [4] we showed by
simulation, and later it has been proven by practice, that if we
consider average power per each minute, obtained from LP01
of energy (PMED_1min=ELP01/60), we can calculate each minute
the energies related to the ancillary service, getting a very low
error on the whole commercial interval of one hour. Figure 4
shows that this error, compared with the ideal etalon, is always
under 0.5% in the analyzed cases, thus bringing a new method
Figure 6. PQ diagram of a synchronous (classic) generator
of ancillary services calculations by using only energy meters,
as traditionally is done also for the transferred energy.