Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
by
___________________________
Copyright Lesley Diana Frame 2007
Master of Science
In the Graduate College
THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
2007
2
STATEMENT BY AUTHOR
Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission,
provide that accurate acknowledgement of source is made. Requests for permission for
extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be
granted by the copyright holder.
SIGNED:________________________________
_________________________________ ___________________
Pamela B. Vandiver Date
3
Acknowledgements
DEDICATION
To Steven
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES. 7
LIST OF TABLES 10
ABSTRACT 11
Chapter 1: BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION FOR RESEARCH..12
1.1: The Earliest Metallurgy of the Ancient World..... 12
1.1.a: Native Copper to Sulfide Ores 12
1.1.b: Production of Copper in Iran.. 15
1.1.c: The Appearance of Tin 17
1.2: Chronology and Geography of Western Asia 19
1.3: The Sequence at Godin Tepe.... 23
1.4: Purpose of the Present Investigation......25
Chapter 2: EQUIPMENT AND METHODS USED IN THIS INVESTIGATION. 27
2.1: Artifact Inventory.. 27
2.2: Sampling Strategy.. 27
2.2: Methods of Analysis. 32
2.3.a: Preparation of Samples 32
2.3.b: Electron Microprobe Analysis 34
Chapter 3: ANALYTICAL RESULTS.39
3.1: Period VI:1 (3300-3050 BCE).. 39
3.2: Period IV (2950-2700 BCE). 44
3.3: Period III (2600-1400 BCE). 45
3.3.a: Period III:6 (2600-2400 BCE). 50
3.3.b: Period III:5 (2400-2200 BCE).58
3.3.c: Period III:4 (2100-1900 BCE). 58
3.3.d: Period III:2 (1900-1600 BCE).65
3.3.e: Period Post III:2 (1600-1400 BCE). 67
3.4: Period II (800-600 BCE)68
3.5: Summary of Results. 71
Chapter 4: DISCUSSION OF THE METALLURGY AT GODIN TEPE.. 112
4.1: The Argument for Small-Scale Local Metal Production.. 112
4.1.a: Raw Materials 114
4.1.b: The Use of Crucibles for Smelting. 117
4.1.b.i: Processing Setup. 117
4.1.b.ii: Crucible Charge.. 118
4.1.b.iii: Maximum Processing Temperatures. 125
4.1.c: The Right-Angle Tuyere from Period III:2. 128
4.1.d: The Molds from Godin Tepe. 131
4.2: A Regional Perspective..132
4.2.a: The Intentionality of Composition.. 133
4.2.a.i: Benefits of Arsenic and Tin Solute in Copper.. 134
4.2.a.ii: Evidence for Alloy Choice.. 135
4.2.a.iii: Transition from Cu-As to Cu-Sn Alloys.146
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.2.b: Methods of Manufacture. 148
4.2.b.i: Cooling Rates for Cast Objects.153
4.3: Conclusions157
APPENDIX A: All Godin Tepe Metal Finds.. 161
APPENDIX B: Photographs of Artifacts with Sample Orientations Indicated 170
APPENDIX C: Phase Diagrams Used in Chapter 4. 210
REFERENCES. 216
7
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.24 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd71-141, (b) Gd69-693 Period III:4.. 94
Figure 3.25 Metallographic sections of (a,b) A1-69ss2, (c) B1-38, Period III:4,
Nuggets. 95
Figure 3.26 Optical light micrograph of AA2-193ss9 Period III:4, melting crucible.. 96
Figure 3.27 XRD spectrum of AA2-193ss9, Crucible, Period III:4. 97
Figure 3.28 Metallographic sections of (a) C2-112ss10, (b) Gd69-694, Period III:2.. 98
Figure 3.29 Metallographic sections of Gd67-237, Blade, Period III:2... 99
Figure 3.30 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd67-196, Armourplate, (b) Gd67-201,
Arrowhead, Period III:2 100
Figure 3.31 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd67-215, (b) Gd67-219, Period III:2. 101
Figure 3.32 Metallographic sections of (a)AA2-154ss1, and (b) MB1 #5, Period
III:2 102
Figure 3.33 Metallographic sections of Gd67-231, Period III:2, Bracelet... 103
Figure 3.34 XRD spectrum of A1-40, Period III:2, Tuyere. 104
Figure 3.35 XRD spectrum of A01-50ss40, Period VI:1, Crucible fragment. 105
Figure 3.36 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd67-450, (b) Gd67-452, and (c) Gd67-
455, Period Post III:, Arrow/spearheads 106
Figure 3.37 Metallographic sections of Gd67-453, Period Post III:2, Bracelet.. 107
Figure 3.38 Metallographic sections of (a) EE01-1 and (b) Gd67-729, Period II 108
Figure 3.39 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd71-343 and (b) Gd71-344, Period II,
Pins 109
Figure 3.40 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd69-216, (b) Gd69-461, (c,d) Gd73-
419, Period II, Pins 110
Figure 3.41 Metallographic sections of Gd69-215, Bracelet, Period II 111
Figure 4.1: Plan map for Godin Tepe central mound with grid and metallurgical
finds indicated (adapted from Young and Levine 1974).. 113
Figure 4.2: Map showing ore deposits (numbered), High Road (dotted line) and
Godin Tepe (adapted from Bazin and Hubner 1969 and Henrickson 1986)..... 115
Figure 4.3: Schematic drawing of pit smelting operation 118
Figure 4.4: Metallographic sections of (a) A1-1123ss521, Period IV, and (b) B1-
510ss28, Period VI:1, Crucibles 121
Figure 4.5: Copper rich end of the Cu-O phase diagram (Neumann et al. 1990) 122
Figure 4.6: Cu-O stability diagram (Neumann et al. 1990). 122
Figure 4.7: Metallographic section of A1-1109ss511.. 123
Figure 4.8: Cu-As equilibrium phase diagram (Subramanian and Laughlin 1990). 124
Figure 4.9: Retained arsenic during smelting operations at various temperatures
(Pollard et al. 1991)125
Figure 4.10: (a) Liquid regions of FeO-Fe2O3-SiO2-CaO-Al2O3 slag at 1250oC and
PO2 of 10-8 atm, for various Al2O3 contents; and (b)Liquidus surface of FeO-
Fe2O3-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO slag at 7% MgO, 2% Al2O3 and PO2 of 10-8 atm
(Kongoli 2003:205)127
9
Figure 4.11: Straight tuyeres from (a) Yanik Tepe and (b) Kyul Tepe; scale in cm
(Kushnareva 1997:198). 129
Figure 4.12: Tuyere from Godin Tepe (A1-40) showing (a) interior and (b)
exterior.. 130
Figure 4.13: Molds from Godin Tepe (a) Gd69-218, Period III:1, and (b) Gd71-
120, Period III:6 shown at the same scale. 131
Figure 4.14: Molds from (a) Kyul Tepe, and (b) Geoy Tepe; scale in cm
(Kushnareva 1997:198). 132
Figure 4.15: Cu-Ag equilibrium phase diagram (Murray 1984)...... 138
Figure 4.16: The presence of optimum composition arsenic in Godin Tepe metal
artifacts. 143
Figure 4.17: Tin content according to period and artifact type 147
Figure 4.18: Relationship between secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS) and
cooling rate ( T ) for different alloys (after Askeland 1984:160, Grugel 1993) 154
10
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Sixty-nine metal samples with accession numbers and context. 29
Table 2.2: Nine samples of metallurgical processing debris.... 31
Table 2.3: Grinding and polishing routine for opaque sections 32
Table 2.4: Elements and detection conditions for microprobe analysis.. 36
Table 3.1: Microprobe results for Period VI:1 Metals.. 41
Table 3.2: Microprobe results for Period VI:1 Oxides. 42
Table 3.3: Microprobe results for Period IV Metals. 46
Table 3.4: Microprobe results for Period IV Oxides. 48
Table 3.5: Microprobe results for Period III:6 & Period III:5 Metals.. 52
Table 3.6: Microprobe results for Period III:4, III:2 & Post III:2 Metals. 60
Table 3.7: Microprobe results for Period III Oxides. 64
Table 3.8: Microprobe results for Period II Metals... 69
Table 4.1: Melting temperatures for entrapped prills... 126
Table 4.2: Eutectic phase compositions for crucible slag 128
Table 4.3: Electromotive Force Series (Vansek 1984).. 139
Table 4.4: Composition of Ni- and Ag-bearing artifacts (bdl=below detection
limit).. 140
Table 4.5: Metal artifacts with dendritic microstructures (bdl=below detection
limit).. 154
Table 4.6: Calculated cooling rates for Godin Tepe cast artifacts 156
Table 4.7: Typical cooling rates157
11
ABSTRACT
The excavation of Godin Tepe during the 1960s and 1970s uncovered a thriving
trade center along the High Road occupied during the Chalcholithic though Iron Ages.
The site contained over two hundred metal finds ranging from the decorative and
aesthetic to utilitarian and functional. The decorative items, such as pins and jewelry
show a high degree of variability in composition and manufacturing method even for
craftsmen copied style and form, but not technological manufacturing methods, from
their contemporaries. In contrast, the utilitarian items, such as chisels, show uniform
methods of manufacture, which reflect the craftsmens desire to achieve specific material
properties for these objects. In addition to metal artifacts that were produced elsewhere
and brought to Godin through trade, this site hosted a small scale metallurgical industry
as early as Period VI:1, evidenced by the crucible, furnace and ore fragments found in
these levels.
12
The present study is concerned with the nature of metal manufacture and use on
the Iranian Plateau during the Bronze and Iron Ages as represented by the artifacts from
Godin Tepe. To appreciate the significance of the local metallurgical technology, a brief
overview of the development of metallurgy in west Asia and the Near East is warranted.
Copper is one of only a few metals that occur in metallic form in nature either by
deposition from ground water flowing through rock fissures or through various leaching
processes that selectively remove sulfide ores (Craig and Vaughan 1981). As ancient
craftsmen of the time searched for raw materials to create lithic implements, outcrops of
the ductile, lustrous material would be easily spotted as an exotic and unique material. It
is therefore hardly surprising that this metal first appears in the archaeological record as
roughly worked implements of native copper (Tylecote 1992, Pigott 1999:2). The metal
was valued for its ability to be reshaped repeatedly unlike stone, a material with which
contemporary craftsmen were more familiar. More significant for our purposes,
however, is the transition from the early appearances copper in its native form to its
The earliest native copper appears at ayn Tepesi during the Neolithic and Ali
Kosh as early as the 9th millennium BCE (Pigott 1999:2, Tylecote 1992; Hole 1962).
(See Figure 1.1) Although these metal finds were not annealed, later examples of native
copper do show evidence of heat treatment (Tylecote 1992). Copper can be annealed at
the transition from annealing to melting native copper is not hard to image. However,
the transition from using native copper to the production of copper metal by smelting
ores would require more experimentation and creativity on the part of the craftsmen.
hindered by the lack of direct evidence, but many scholars believe that smelting
technology developed from a familiarity with colorful copper oxide ores (such as green
(Tylecote 1992). Although most early ceramic kilns did not produce atmospheres that
craftsmen were aware of how to control firing atmospheres and, with slight
Early smelting took advantage of oxide and carbonate ores that were easily
identified in outcrops and also easily smelted at temperatures well-below the melting
temperature of copper (Thompson 1958). The reaction could follow one of the
following:
Smelting first occurred in small crucibles that were charged with crushed ore and a
carbon-rich fuel source. With a reducing atmosphere, the CO combines with the oxygen
of the ore to leave behind copper metal. If the atmosphere is not sufficiently reducing,
or if the ore of interest is associated with other minerals, there can be un-reduced
inclusions left behind in the resulting metal. Also it should be noted that while smelting
can occur as low as 600oC (Thompson 1958), the resulting metal at these temperatures is
dispersed in the crucible slag in the form of small prills of copper (Charles 1979). The
crucible must be crushed to separate the metal, which is remelted to form a useable
copper sulfide and copper iron sulfide minerals. Smelting sulfide ores requires an
additional step, whereby the sulfur is driven off by the presence of oxygen, usually
referred to as roasting. This can be done in two stages where the ore is heated in an
be done in a single step, in which sulfide ores are combined with oxide ores so that the
oxygen from the oxide ores combines directly with the sulfur. The latter method is a
In addition to using more complex ores, later copper production saw the use of
furnaces, which further increased fuel efficiency. The processing debris left behind by
this early copper production includes ore, crucibles, slag, furnaces, molds, and tuyeres.
The earliest evidence for slag has been found at atal Hyk in Anatolia (c. 7th
copper ores. By the 4th millennium BCE, there is strong evidence for a smelting
industry in west Asia demonstrated by the presence of arsenical copper awls and chisels
at Tepe Yahya (c. 3800 BCE) as well as axes excavated in Egypt (Tylecote 1992).
By the 5th millennium BCE, there is evidence for large scale production of
copper, and scholars agree that the development of an early extractive metallurgical
technology was closely related to the local geology. Early metallurgical activity is
Some of the earliest evidence for copper production has been found at Tal-i Iblis,
located in southern Iran, representing some of the earliest copper production of the
ancient world. The earliest materials at Tal-i Iblis date to the 5th millennium BCE, and
show clear evidence for large-scale production of copper using crucibles (Frame 2004,
Caldwell 1968). The 4th millennium BCE saw a large increase in the number of
16
production centers across Iran including industries at Arisman, Tepe Ghabristan, Tepe
Hissar, and Shar-i Sokhta. Arisman maintained a crucible smelting industry from 3700
to 3000 BCE, switching to the use of furnaces after 3000 BCE (Helwing pers. comm.
2007). Tepe Ghabristan revealed similar evidence of crucibles and molds (Majidzadeh
1979). Though this site has been cited as a 5th millennium BCE (Pigott 1999:77) or even
6th millennium BCE (Thornton et al. 2002) workshop, recent reconsideration places it
hundreds of kilograms of slag scattered across the site (Pigott 1989; 1982; Tosi 1989).
The production at Shar-i Sokhta was longer-lived, lasting into the 3 rd millennium (Pigott
1999:86). The 3rd millennium also saw a rise in production centers at Shahdad and Tepe
Sialk (Pigott 1999:89), though details of the large scale production at Shahdad during
the second half of the third millennium BCE are not well-published (Hakemi 1992). At
Tepe Sialk, production occurred on the South Hill during the 3rd millennium. (These
materials are currently being studied by Marcus Schreiner of the Universitt Tbingen.)
It appears that production at Arisman continued into the 2nd millennium BCE; the
ongoing excavations at this site will hopefully shed further light on the nature of
production there.
The major ore sources for these production centers are believed to be at Anarak,
Veshnoveh, and Taknar (Figure 1.1), each of which shows evidence of ancient mining.
The largest of these mining districts is the Anarak district with primary sources at
17
Talmessi and Meskani in north central Dasht-i Lut (Pigott 1999:78). However, smaller
in the ancient world. This production of Cu-As alloys is well documented for Shar-i
Sokhta, among others (Pigott 1999:86). Cu-As alloys were valued for their increased
hardness and improved mechanical properties. This alloy appears as early as the mid-4th
millennium BCE in Palestine and on the Iranian Plateau at Susa, Tepe Yahya and Tal-i
Malyan (Pigott 1999:3). It is unclear whether these artifacts reflect co-smelted copper
and arsenic ores, or if arsenic ores, such as algodonite (Cu5As) and domeykite (Cu3As),
were merely dissolved in molten native copper, forcing much of the As into solution
with the copper (Pigott 1999:78). Certainly by the 3rd millennium BCE arsenical copper
The more hotly debated question amongst scholars is not when arsenical copper
alloys appeared, but when tin copper alloys appeared. Tin-bronze artifacts are present in
the 4th millennium BCE levels at Mundigak in eastern Iran and at Tal-i Malyan in
southwest Iran by the early 2nd millennium BCE (Pigott 1999:4). In addition, bronze
appears in the artifact assemblage from the Kish cemetery, dating to the Early Dynastic I
(ED I, early 3rd millennium BCE) and is common at Mesopotamian sites (Gawra Tepe,
Ur, and Kish) by ED III, mid-3rd millennium BCE (Stech 1999:64, Nezafati et al. 2006;
Mesopotamia, it did not appear regularly at Iranian highland sites until the late-3rd
millennium BCE. Given the large scale copper production on the Iranian Plateau and
the heavy flow of metal goods to Mesopotamian lowland sites, it is surprising that the
common appearance of tin occurs so late on the plateau. The reason for this has been
generally attributed to the assumption that tin is coming from Anatolian or Afghani
sources (Pigott 1999:5). As such, tin may have been circumventing the Iranian
highlands altogether and traveling along various sea-based trade routes (Pigott 1999,
Muhly 1999).
new studies identify small tin sources that lie in the metal-rich regions of Iran. One such
site is Deh Hosein, east of Luristan (Nezafati et al. 2006). This relatively small deposit
includes arsenopyrite, native copper, copper sulfide minerals, and cassiterite spread over
27 km2 (Nezafati 2006). The evidence for ancient mining includes hammer stones,
pottery, grinding stones, and the occupation of adjacent settlements. The pottery dates
to the early 1st millennium BCE, but excavated charcoal shows that the mine was also in
The evidence therefore suggests that production of Cu-Sn alloys could have
occurred on the Iranian Plateau using local sources during the 2nd millennium. Further,
it is likely that other sources of tin have been overlooked in this region, given that the
economically viable ore deposits, ignoring these smaller deposits. The presence of small
local Cu-Sn deposits supports the hypothesis that tin was first added to copper
19
accidentally. The present work suggests that the co-occurrence of copper and tin in
small, nearby deposits led to low-Sn-Cu alloys and the eventual recognition of the
benefits of bronze; it was not until the full benefits of tin were recognized that higher
tin-bronzes were produced and better tin sources were exploited, despite being located at
greater distances from production centers. The analyses of the Godin Tepe artifacts
support the hypothesis that the transition from Cu-As to Cu-Sn was much more gradual
The chronology for this region is quite extensive, so the focus here is on the 4th
through 1st millennia BCE as it pertains to the site of Godin Tepe. As metallurgical
technology was developing in small settlements of highland Iran during the 4th
millennium BCE (the Uruk period), Mesopotamia saw the rise of multiple city-states
highlands, there was a period of divergence between valley systems in the Kermanshah
region (near Godin Tepe), with differences in ceramic styles appearing in the Mahidasht
and Kangavar valleys (Levine and Young 1987:21). However this difference dissolved
(ibid. 33) as the Uruk expansion of the late 4th millennium BCE created outposts along
major trade networks in Iran, including Godin Tepe (Lamberg-Karlovsky and Sabloff
Figure 1.1: Archaeological sites in Western Asia (adapted from Pigott 1999:75)
This expansion was likely motivated by a desire for raw materials absent in lowland
Mesopotamia (Lamberg-Karlovsky and Sabloff 1995; Oates 2003; Weiss and Young
1975). It should be noted that ores and metals were imported into the lowlands as early
as the Ubaid period (5th millennium BCE), for example at Tepe Gawra (Lamberg-
Karlovsky and Sabloff 1995:111), but this was not a common occurrence until after the
Uruk Expansion (Beale 1973; Kohl 1982). The new Uruk outposts were usually
established at pre-existing towns, where the lack of destruction evidence suggests that
the presence of Mesopotamian merchants was peaceful and mutually beneficial in nature
(Lamberg-Karlovsky and Sabloff 1995:142). Such outposts were created at Godin Tepe
and Susa, among other sites. The widespread ceramic typologies created by the
21
increased trade have allowed archaeologists to develop relative chronologies like those
Figure 1.2: Chronology for early Godin Tepe levels (courtesy Hilary Gopnik)
22
Godin Tepe was excavated in the late 1960s and early 1970s by T. Cuyler
Young, Jr. from the Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto. It lies in the Iranian highlands
along the major East-West trade route, which is referred to by many names: the High
Road, the Great Khorasan Road, and later, the Silk Road. It is the main route from
Baghdad to the highlands and through northern Iran (Figure 1.4). It passes through the
Zagros Gates and climbs through a series of valleys to the Iranian plateau (Levine and
Young 1987:15, Boardman 1923:8). In addition, two North-South trade routes connect
the High Road to Susa and the southern East-West routes (dotted lines in Figure 1.4).
Figure 1.4: Major trade routes in Iran (adapted from Henrickson 1986).
24
Although Godin Tepe and nearby Seh Gabi reveal an occupation sequence going
back to the 6th millennium BCE, this investigation is interested in Godin Period VI:1 and
later. Godin VI:1 (formerly termed Godin V) marks the appearance of the Uruk
merchants, the construction of a large oval outpost structure at the top of the mound, and
a period of cultural contact with the Mesopotamian lowlands (Weiss and Young
1975:1). Further, this period marks the earliest appearance of metal at Godin. (Earlier
material was excavated at nearby Seh Gabi (Levine 1975), though it is not included in
this study.) During Period VI:1, Godin also had close contact with Susa, another
merchant site to the South. Weiss and Young (1975:14) argue for the local production
of pottery at Godin by Susians during Godin VI:1; however it is impossible to tell if this
is mimicked in the metals due to the hasty abandonment of the mound after Godin VI:1,
for which few items of high value survive in the archaeological record.
During Godin IV, there is evidence for cultural interaction with eastern Luristan,
but not as far as the Mahidasht at the western end of the High Road (Levine and Young
1987:48), and Godin IV pottery was not found in the lowlands (Schacht 1987:177).
By Godin III, the trade and interaction network of the highlands and surrounding
regions was well established, bringing goods from as far as the Indus valley to the East
(Khan 1968), and southern Mesopotamia in the West. This period lasted over one
thousand years with minor gaps between subperiods (Figure 1.3), but the pottery from
this period has been linked typologically to sites across the Iranian Plateau, to the South
After a 500-year hiatus following the end of Godin III, the site was reoccupied
during the Iron Age. Godin II spans 800 to 600 BCE and corresponds to Iron III in
north west Iran and Luristan. This phase at Godin Tepe consists of a large manor
house on top of the occupation mound (Gopnik 2005). The manor included a large
kitchen and multiple storerooms, but no craft areas. It was peacefully abandoned,
leaving no items of value or even the roof beams and wooden columns (Gopnik
2005:253). There are no production remains from this period, though there were a
number of vitrified ceramic sherds from the kitchen (Room 7) and surrounding rooms.
Because Godin Tepe is well situated on the High Road, goods from
Mesopotamia to the West, Azerbaijan to the North, Susa to the South, and Tepe Hissar
to the East entered the sites as evidenced in the ceramic assemblages (Henrickson 1986;
Henrickson 1985; Levine and Young 1987). The vast collection of material culture at
Godin Tepe reveals technological and stylistic transitions that occur throughout the
region as a whole. For example, a shift in pottery technology is apparent with the
absence of grog-tempered pottery during Godin III when compared to sherds of Godin
IV, which are characterized by the appearance of grog-tempered pottery similar to that
The metal finds from Godin Tepe are abundant, including over 200 artifacts.
Given the prominent position of Godin along the High Road, the investigation of the
metal artifacts should provide useful insight into the manufacturing methods employed
26
by the craftsmen of the highland region. In addition, the presence of processing debris
at Godin Tepe shows that at least small-scale production occurred at the site. Analysis
of these technical ceramics sheds light on the nature of small-scale production during
this time, providing a useful corollary to our knowledge of the large-scale processing
from Godin Periods VI:1 (3250-3050 BCE) through II (800-600 BCE) in terms of their
compositions and microstructures, and it also investigates the nature of the metallurgical
debris excavated from Periods VI:1 (3250-3050 BCE), IV (2950-2700 BCE), and III
(2600-1400). The results of this study advance the field of Iranian archaeometallurgy by
highland Iran during the Bronze Age and Iron Age. Analysis of seventy out of over two
The Godin Tepe excavation yielded over two hundred metal artifacts including
jewelry, pins, needles, tools, weapons, and some vessels and other less common artifact
types. The majority were kept in Iran at the Iran National Museum in Tehran, but ninety-
three metal artifacts were sent to the Southwest Asian Department of the Royal Ontario
Museum (ROM) in Toronto, Canada for conservation and storage. These artifacts
included seventeen metal items that were collected specifically for scientific analysis and
are therefore designated with a scientific sample number, ss. The scientific samples
do not have ROM or Godin (Gd) accession numbers; instead they are referred to in this
thesis by their operation and lot (OpLot), and when present, scientific sample (ss)
numbers. The metal artifacts from Godin Tepe included in this study are indicated in the
full list of Godin metal artifacts (Appendix A), which also includes the artifact accession
numbers and current storage locations. In addition to the metal artifacts, the scientific
samples included metallurgical processing debris; these are listed in Table 2.2 and are
discussed below.
Mainly copper-alloy objects were taken for analysis on the basis that the iron
objects from Period II were too heavily corroded and there were too few lead and silver
28
items to be of interest. Of the copper-alloy artifacts, the study focused primarily on tools,
pins, needles, and bracelets. The rings were considerably mineralized, and it was decided
to preserve the vessels on aesthetic grounds. The sixty-nine metal objects indicated in
Appendix A were examined and sampled during two separate visits to the Royal Ontario
Museum (ROM) in June 2006 and December 2006. The objects with ROM accession
numbers were sampled in Toronto using a jewelers saw, and the samples were
However, the samples designated as scientific samples were shipped as whole objects
to be sampled in Tucson using a jewelers saw or Buehler Isomet saw with an abrasive
diamond blade. All available contextual information for these artifacts is given in Table
2.1.
The nine metallurgical debris samples listed in Table 2.2, include crucible,
furnace, tuyere, and ore fragments, and they were shipped as whole samples from
Toronto to Tucson, AZ. All samples listed in Table 2.2 were sectioned using a ceramic
tile circular saw with an abrasive diamond blade. Appendix B contains images of all
sampled metal artifacts as well as the ceramic and ore samples with sample location and
Table 2.1: Sixty-nine metal samples with accession numbers and context
Godin No. Period ROM No. Object Material Op. Tomb Burial Square Lot Stratum Area
Gd 73-312 VI:1 973.456.115 Object Copper-alloy B1 521
Gd 73-379 VI:1 973.456.140 Chisel Copper-alloy A1 1161
Gd 73-86 IV 973.456.43 Pin Copper-alloy B1 530
Gd 73-103 IV 973.456.51 Pin Copper-alloy A1 1084 512
Gd 71-261 IV 971.486.14 Blade Copper-alloy A01 nil
ssX25 IV Nugget Copper-alloy B2 351
Gd 67-113 III:6 967.326.45 Pin Copper-alloy M 1
Gd 67-126 III:6 967.326.47 Pin Copper-alloy M 2
Gd 71-73 III:6 971.486.44 Pin Copper-alloy A2 286
Gd 71-159 III:6 971.486.78 Pin Copper-alloy C2 87
Gd 73-68 III:6 973.456.36 Pin Copper-alloy A2 1037 60
Gd 71-50 III:6 971.486.39 Needle Copper-alloy B2 177
Gd 71-188 III:6 971.486.89 Needle Copper-alloy B2 237
Gd 71-276 III:6 971.486.116 Needle Copper-alloy B1 269 24
Gd 73-82 III:6 973.456.42 Needle Copper-alloy A2 1066 60
Gd 73-109 III:6 973.456.54 Needle Copper-alloy A2 1066 60
Gd 71-49 III:6 971.486.38 Wire Copper-alloy B1 161 15
Gd 67-102 III:6 967.326.18 Bracelet Copper-alloy M loose fill 1
Gd 67-103 III:6 967.326.41 Bracelet Copper-alloy M 1
Gd 67-104 III:6 967.326.42 Bracelet Copper-alloy M loose fill 1
Gd 67-117 III:6 967.326.46 Bracelet Copper-alloy M 1
Gd 71-19 III:6 971.486.28 Chisel Copper-alloy B2 157
Gd 71-246 III:6 971.486.108 Chisel Copper-alloy A1 347
Gd 71-318 III:6 971.486.131 Awl or chisel Copper-alloy A2 314
Nugget, fibula
ss25 III:6 Copper-alloy A1 347
pin coil?
ss26 III:6 Nugget Copper-alloy A1 351
ss9 III:5 Pin Copper-alloy A1 188
Gd 71-207 III:5 971.486.94 Needle Copper-alloy A1 240
29
30
Table 2.1: Sixty-nine metal samples with accession numbers and context (continued)
Godin No. Period ROM No. Object Material Op. Tomb Burial Square Lot Stratum Area
Gd 69-558 III:4 969.370.104 Pin Copper-alloy B2 113
Gd 69-693 III:4 969.370.124 Pin Copper-alloy A2 179
Gd 71-141 III:4 971.486.68 Pin Copper-alloy C2 84 8
ss2 III:4 Nugget Copper-alloy A1 69
III:4 Nugget Copper-alloy B1 38 8
Gd 67-207 III:2 967.326.68 Pin Copper-alloy O 10
Gd 67-215 III:2 967.326.71 Pin Copper-alloy O 1 B
Gd 67-219 III:2 967.326.16 Pin Copper-alloy O 1 B
III:2 Pin Copper-alloy M'B#5 4
ss1 III:2 Wire Copper-alloy AA2 154 u 13
Gd 67-224 III:2 967.326.14 Anklet Copper-alloy O 1 B
Gd 67-231 III:2 967.326.77 Bracelet Copper-alloy O 1 B
Gd 69-694 III:2 969.370.125 Chisel Copper-alloy A2 165 u
ss10 III:2 Chisel Copper-alloy C2 112
Gd 67-196 III:2 967.326.64 Armourplate Copper-alloy O 3
Gd 67-201 III:2 967.326.65 Arrowhead Copper-alloy O 8
Gd 67-202 III:2 967.326.66 Dagger Copper-alloy O 8
Gd 67-237 III:2 967.326.82 Blade Copper-alloy O 1 A
ss5 III:2 Blade Copper-alloy AA2 176 12 16
Gd 67-453 Post III:2 967.326.9 Bracelet Copper-alloy 2 AA2 6
Arrow/spear
Gd 67-450 Post III:2 967.326.11 Copper-alloy 2 AA2 6
head
Arrow/spear
Gd 67-452 Post III:2 967.326.10 Copper-alloy 2 AA2 6
head
Gd 67-455 Post III:2 967.326.15 Spearhead Copper-alloy 2 AA2 6
Gd 65-33 III ? 965.275.11 Chisel Copper-alloy A Surface
Gd 71-153 III ? 971.486.73 Needle Copper-alloy C1 111
Gd 73-73 III ? 973.456.37 Arrowhead Copper-alloy Surface
III Wire Silver A2 5
30
31
Table 2.1: Sixty-nine metal samples with accession numbers and context (continued)
Godin No. Period ROM No. Object Material Op. Tomb Burial Square Lot Stratum Area
ss1 III Chisel Copper-alloy B2
ssX18 III Wire Lead B2
Gd 69-216 II 969.370.52 Pin Copper-alloy BB2 2 3
Gd 69-461 II 969.370.93 Pin Copper-alloy B3 15 4 3
Gd 71-344 II 971.486.142 Pin Copper-alloy NW 2 2
Gd 73-419 II 973.456.151 Pin Copper-alloy 1 1
Gd 71-343 II 971.486.141 Pin Copper-alloy NW 2 2
? Wire Lead B1 10 or 11
Gd 69-215 II 969.370.51 Bracelet Copper-alloy CC1 4 3
Gd 67-65 II 967.326.35 Chisel Iron
Gd 69-729 II Arrowhead Copper-alloy BB3 26 3b 4
II "tang of point" Copper-alloy EE01 1 1
ss521 II Nugget Iron A3 313 52 54
Nugget and
II Copper-alloy CC2 3
pin
31
32
in Tables 2.1 and 2.2. All samples taken for analysis were mounted in Buehler Epo
corroded and porous samples. These were ground and polished on a Buehler 2-speed
polishing wheel to 1m according to the preparation method outlined in Table 2.3 and
Figure 2.1. In orientation A, the sample is held in a single position on the polishing
wheel with the abrasive motion indicated by arrows. For orientation B, the sample is
held in a single position turned 90o from orientation A so that new scratches occur
rotated around the polishing wheel in the opposite direction of wheel movement.
33
Sample
A B Wheel rotation
C direction
The samples were coated with 200-250 of carbon for SEM and electron
microprobe analysis (see below for details of these analytical techniques). After these
grain boundaries, and other features of the microstructures of the samples. The copper-
base alloy samples were etched using a ferric chloride solution (10gFeCl3, 30mL HCl,
195mL H2O). The etch times varied depending on alloy composition and degree of
34
corrosion in the sample but ranged from 10-45 seconds. The microstructures were
examined using a Nikon Eclipse microscope equipped with a MicroFireTM CCD camera
In addition, five samples (indicated on Table 2.2) were also taken for powder X-
ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. These samples include three ceramic samples and two
ore fragments. The tuyere (A1-40, Period III:2) and the furnace fragment (A01-50ss40,
Period VI:1) were sampled from unvitrified regions using a jewelers saw. They were
then powdered in a Diamonite high density powdered synthetic sapphire mortar and
pestle. The crucible (AA2-193ss9, Period III:4) was sampled from the vitrified, slag
region by the same method. The two ore samples (A1-1123ss521-ore, Period IV and
A01-34ss29, Period VI:1) were crushed and powdered with the Diamonite mortar and
pestle. These samples were analyzed using the Scintag XDS 2000 PTS
The microprobe analyses were carried out on the Cameca Sx50 SEM-equipped
spectrographic measurements were taken to determine composition of the metal and slag
samples. WDS measurements included the elements identified in Table 2.4. All
35
measurements were automatically corrected for background x-rays, and the instrument
was calibrated on the morning of each measurement session using the standards indicated
in Table 2.4. Table 2.4 also identifies the corresponding diffraction crystals used to
detect each of these elements and typical detection limits for the elements of interest.
Figure 2.2: Schematic cross-section for the Cameca Sx50 Electron Microprobe (Domanik
2001)
36
The analyses were conducted at 20.0nA and 25keV and 15keV for the metals and
silicates, respectively. A 1m beam spot size was used to maintain resolution and
precision in areas of high heterogeneity. For all bulk analysis of metals and silicate
phases, multiple measurements were averaged and both n and the standard deviation
for these measurements are indicated in the results section (Chapter 3).
Electron microprobe analysis employs the use of an incident electron beam and
the detection of secondary characteristic x-rays. These characteristic x-rays are produced
when incident electrons cause inner-shell electrons to be ejected from the atom. As the
outer-shell electrons relax to fill the electron vacancies, x-ray photons are emitted with
37
energy that is characteristic to the particular atom. These x-rays can be reabsorbed to
emit Auger electrons, or emitted from the atom entirely. Because higher atomic number
atoms have a higher proportion of emitted x-rays compared to the reabsorbed x-rays,
these are the more easily detected elements with this method of analysis (Domanik
2001:11). The characteristic x-rays are detected using strategically positioned diffraction
between planes of atoms, and is the incident angle of the x-rays. This allows only the
diffraction crystals. Therefore, x-rays with different energies, which are characteristic of
different elements, can be detected. The diffraction crystals used for these analyses are
listed in Table 2.4. There were two thallium acid phthalate (TAP) crystals, a
concentration of the element in the sample (Domanik 2001:26). Therefore the x-ray
sample:
38
Cunk I unk
(Eq. 2.2)
Cstd I std
corrected intensity of x-rays, and unk and std stand for unknown and standard,
respectively. However, this simple relationship does not take into account the scattering
and attenuation of the electron beam, or the x-ray absorption and secondary fluorescence
that take place as the emitted x-rays interact with the sample volume. Therefore, these
values must also be corrected. For the analyses reported here, the PAP matrix correction
method is employed to correct for ZAF (atomic number, absorption and secondary
fluorescence) effects. This method is based on experimental data and allows for more
accurate corrections for geologic materials and light elements when compared to the
For the analysis of silicate phases, oxygen could not be detected (due to its low
balance for each element. However, this calculation holds the assumption that elements
with multiple oxidation states are only present in their lowest oxidation state. For
example, all iron was calculated as FeO rather than Fe2O3. It is impossible to determine
the oxidation state of the elements using this method of analysis, but this is only a minor
The results of the analyses described in Chapter 2 are reported below by period
beginning with the earliest materials. These data are reported in wt%, and generally
Although Chapter 2 reported typical detection limits for each element, the actual
detection limit varied with each measurement. Therefore bdl (below detection limit)
reported in the tables here, corresponds to the measurement-specific detection limit, and
not the averages reported previously. Further, the standard deviation for the averaged
measurements of the bulk metal for each artifact is reported as X for each element
where appropriate. All compositions other than the bulk metal phase are reported in
shaded rows in the tables. In addition to the data presented here, Appendix B contains
occurs in Chapter 4.
The two metal artifacts analyzed from this period include a possible figurine
include a fragment of a technical ceramic (B1-510 ss28, p.171), a furnace fragment (A01-
50ss40, p.171), and ore fragments (A01-34 ss29). The composition of the metals and the
40
prills within the crucible and furnace fragments are shown in Table 3.1. The oxide
composition of the technical ceramic, furnace, and the ore are shown in Table 3.2.
The chisel is completely mineralized with only an outline of the original structure
and silver-rich regions in the corrosion products remaining. Many of the artifacts in this
study contain these silver-rich phases. As will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter 4
(on p.137), this is due to the galvanic corrosion of silver and copper. These high-silver
regions are not representative of the original alloy composition, and should be seen here
as secondary (post burial) features of the microstructure. They are indicated in the
inclusions. This artifact has an as-cast structure showing microsegregation within the
dendrites (Figure 3.1). The compositions with low totals in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 are the
poorly preserved artifacts that exhibit a higher degree of corrosion. Therefore, with such
low totals, there is less confidence for the accuracy of these measurements.
The crucible and furnace fragments contain many prills of high-purity copper.
However, the sulfur-rich inclusions within the prills indicate that these crucibles were
employed for smelting ore rather than melting native copper. Such high concentrations
of sulfur (ranging from 5.09 to 20.19wt%S) would be impossible to achieve from melting
native copper (Coghlan 1962, 1951; Patterson 1971; Tylecote 1980, 1992), which can be
Due to the large number of figures for this chapter, they have all been placed after the text on page 73.
41
41
42
42
43
minerals mixed with the pure carbonate and oxide ores of tenorite-CuO, cuprite-Cu2O,
Period VI:1 contain thin layers of slag on their interior surfaces. These slag regions were
varying amounts of MgO and FeO (5-7wt%) and 0.6 to 2.1wt% of Na2O and K2O. They
show a SiO2:Al2O3 ratio of about 4.2; thus the ceramic composition is neither highly
refractory nor highly fluxed. The microstructure of the technical ceramic (Figure 3.2)
shows small angular crystals in a glassy phase. The low iron content is typical of a
melting slag rather than a smelting slag, but the distinction here is difficult based on
these analyses.
The ore, A01-34ss29, was found in the same square as the furnace fragment, but
this specimen did not show signs of being heated. It was probably a less desirable,
discarded fragment due to the high amount of gangue associated with the copper
minerals; regardless, it reflects the type of ore obtained by craftsmen for the copper
production taking place in this locus. It was powdered for XRD. The XRD spectrum
(Figure 3.3) reveals that this ore consists of cuprite, wstite, goethite, and delafossite, as
well as gangue material such as quartz, wollastonite, and potassium carbonate, which is
consistent with the probe composition of copper-iron oxides and silicate phases. The
The microprobe results for three metal finds and four metal processing samples
from this period are shown in Tables 3.3 and 3.4. A blade (Gd71-261) and a pin (Gd73-
inclusions. However, in contrast to the other two artifacts, the lump from processing
(B2-351ssX25) contained a high amount of Fe and Ni. This is an indication that this
nugget was produced during a separate casting event than the other two objects and
perhaps even in a different workshop (see below, Chapter 4) The microstructures of the
metal objects revealed that the blade (Gd71-261, Figure 3.4) and pin (Gd73-86) have
remnant cast structures and show signs of cold-working. The lump of processing metal is
almost entirely mineralized, but small areas of metal were analyzed (Table 3.3), and the
The processing material from this period included multiple crucible fragments
(A1-1123ss521) containing a thin layer of slag at the rim and interior surface and
Appendix B (p.175). In addition, there were two other samples of technical ceramics
(Figure 3.6) and A1-1109ss511 (Figure 3.7) are typical of smelting slag, as shown by the
partially decomposed ore (Figure 3.7). However, A2-1184ss63 is a melting slag (Figure
3.8). This is determined by the presence of delafossite (CuFeO2) needles and cuprite
(Cu2O) in the slag. The cuprite can be seen in cross-polarized light in Figure 3.8b as the
45
orange region. These features are typical of high oxygen partial pressure (PO2) during
the production event, and while such high O2 would not be conducive to smelting copper,
it would be acceptable for melting copper. The compositions of the glassy phase in these
slags indicate a switch in the raw material from calcareous clay to a higher alumina and
iron oxide composition (Table 3.4). The prills entrapped in the slag are not especially
pure, containing as much as 25wt%Fe, 26wt%As, and 3.5wt%Sb along with variable
Ni, As, and Sb concentrations. The largest prill entrapped in this slag has a cast structure
3.9). Such a high As content does not appear in any artifacts, but it is possible (and
reasonably likely) that this prill represents a primary smelt from a polymetallic ore, like
the fragments found with many of the crucible fragments in locus A1-1123. The ore
chalcopyrite, a copper carbonate, and quartz gangue, as shown in the XRD spectra
(Figure 3.10).
Period III is the longest period for Godin Tepe covering over one thousand years.
Fortunately it has been divided into subperiods based on the architecture and pottery
sequences (see Chapter 1 for discussion of Godin Tepe and regional chronology). The
46
Prill 2 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 87.61 0.09 bdl bdl bdl 87.70*
Bright inclusion
in Prill 1 1 0.09 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 37.45 12.22 bdl bdl bdl 49.76*
Metal in corrosion
product 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 90.24 2.40 bdl bdl bdl bdl 92.64
*These low totals are most likely due to the presence of undetected oxygen and salts.
Standard deviations are not reported for most measurements here due to the low number of analyses for each phase.
46
47
Prill 2 1 bdl bdl bdl 0.31 bdl 0.07 91.14 0.09 6.00 bdl 1.57 99.18
Prill 3
Primary phase 1 bdl bdl bdl 0.13 bdl 0.07 93.62 bdl 4.82 bdl 0.66 99.30
Prill 3 -
Secondary phase 1 bdl 0.14 bdl 2.06 bdl bdl 70.17 bdl 26.65 bdl 0.11 99.13
Prill 3
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl bdl 38.40 1.44 bdl 17.47 34.55 bdl 9.01 bdl 5.70 106.57
Melting
A2-1184ss63 crucible Prill 1 1 0.05 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 25.26 bdl 0.11 0.13 25.54**
Prill 2 1 0.47 0.07 0.18 bdl bdl bdl 43.12 0.52 3.19 bdl bdl 47.56***
*These low totals are most likely due to the presence of undetected oxygen and salts.
**In addition to missing O, EDS showed that this prill also contains Si, resulting in this low total.
**EDS showed Cl in this prill
47
48
48
49
results from microprobe analyses reveal that tin makes its first appearance at Godin Tepe
in a pin from Period III:6 (2600-2400 BCE); however, its presence is restricted to burial
contexts until Period III:4 (2100-1900 BCE). All items from burial contexts are indicated
with asterisks before the Gd accession number in Table 3.5, and it can be seen that the
artifacts found in earlier Period III non-burial contexts contain only trace amounts of tin
(<0.07wt%Sn), if any. During Period III:4 and later, tin is present in 16 out of 23
artifacts, and the social and mechanical implications for this tin content is discussed
below in Chapter 4. The majority of the metal objects are presented here by subperiod.
However, there are six Period III objects with unspecified or imprecise contexts. These
Two of these objects are Cu-As-Sn alloy chisels (Gd65-33, B2ss1) with very
similar microstructures. Figures 3.11 and 3.12 show the large aspect ratios for the copper
sulfide inclusions, as well as the heavy cold-working for each of these chisels. In
addition, as with the Period VI:1 and Period IV metals, many of the Period III metal
artifacts also include silver-rich regions. As discussed previously, these regions result
from post burial galvanic corrosion of the copper metal and are not indicative of the
structure (Figure 3.13a), similar to some of the needles and pins reported below. Two
non-copper base wires are unstratified from Period III (A2-5, Ag and B2ssX18, Pb), and
both show large grains and annealing twins (Figures 3.13b and 3.13c). The final
dirty copper with copper-iron sulfide and copper-lead inclusions. The microstructure
(Figure 3.14) indicates heavy working from the high aspect ratio (5:1) of the sulfide
inclusions, but the annealing twins indicate that this artifact was annealed after or during
periods of time will result in a higher number of coarse, equiaxed grains. Low
temperature annealing allows recovery from the high energy defects induced during cold-
(Sinha 2003:5.3).
In this study, needles, undecorated pins, and wires have been grouped together.
The main reason for this is that some of the pins and needles are incomplete, and a needle
with a missing eye could easily be categorized as a pin. Similarly, many artifacts labeled
as pins are curved and quite thin, and they are indistinguishable from some artifacts
labeled as wires. Second, not all pins are decorated and therefore even within the pin
composition and microstructure does not differentiate any of the pin, needle, wire
designations assigned in the field. Regardless, these designations are included here for
The subperiod III:6 contained the majority of the Period III artifacts (22 out of
54), and includes three chisels, thirteen wire/pin/needle samples, four bracelets, and two
51
unidentifiable lumps of copper-base metal. The compositions for these are reported in
Table 3.5. Three bracelets (Gd67-117, Gd67-102, Gd67-104) and one of the pins (Gd67-
126) are the only samples to contain Sn (1.3 4.3wt%) and all are from burial contexts.
The chisels (Gd71-19, Gd71-246, Gd71-318) are Cu-As alloys (1 2wt%As) and all
exhibit signs of heavy working (Figure 3.15), although only Gd71-19 and Gd71-246
show the same banded structure as the previous chisels. Gd71-318 has many slip lines,
but it was mounted in a different orientation and was actually identified by the excavators
as an Awl or Chisel, which may account for these differences in microstructure from
the other chisels. The chisel, Gd71-247, also shows signs of annealing evidenced by a
few annealing twins and the more rounded grains. Although, less than 2wt%As is not
McKerrel 1976:169), the processing to which these chisels were subjected (i.e., cold-
Eleven of the needles, pins, and wire are also Cu-As alloys (1.3 3wt%As) with
Pb and sulfide inclusions. The pin with 4.3wt%Sn (Gd67-126) was mentioned previously
(Figure 3.17), and the twelfth pin (Gd67-113) is pure copper and is similar in style and
microstructure to a 8wt%Sn pin from Period III:2 (Gd67-207) as shown in Figure 3.16.
slightly in grain size and degree of working, indicated by annealing twins and slip lines
(Figures 3.17 and 3.18), but one (Gd71-73) shows a very different structure with
extensive cold working (slip lines) and remnant segregation of solute (Figure 3.19).
52
Table 3.5: Microprobe results for Period III:6 & Period III:5 Metals
Godin No. Per. Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
0.27 0.67 0.22 96.56 0.17 2.09 0.14
Gd65-33 III Chisel Metal 8 bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.11
0.01 1.52 0.02 0.39 0.01 0.24 0.01
Dark Inclusions 5 bdl 3.03 0.33 0.22 0.09 0.18 92.17 0.95 1.70 bdl 0.12 98.81
Metal in
5 bdl 0.04 bdl 0.13 0.14 77.08 11.14 bdl bdl bdl bdl 88.52
corroded region
Metal in
3 bdl bdl bdl 39.33 0.25 27.57 21.55 0.04 7.85 bdl bdl 96.59
corroded region
1.11 0.05 0.06 3.01 0.12 95.12 1.21 0.11
B2 ss1 III Chisel Metal 5 bdl bdl bdl 101.01
0.09 0.05 0.01 0.31 0.05 0.83 0.25 0.02
Dark Inclusions
3 bdl 3.32 1.28 bdl 2.78 0.11 91.00 0.24 1.30 bdl 0.08 100.11
(elongated)
Bright Inclusion 3 bdl bdl bdl 0.06 3.00 0.10 95.03 0.02 1.34 bdl 0.08 99.63
0.06 0.06 0.06 98.47 0.33 0.19
Gd73-73 III Arrowhead Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.92
0.06 0.01 0.00 0.52 0.02 0.19
Dark Inclusion 1 bdl 7.60 bdl bdl 0.05 bdl 88.81 1.84 bdl bdl bdl 98.30
Bright Inclusion 2 bdl 0.08 3.88 bdl 0.06 bdl 95.94 0.33 bdl bdl bdl 100.28
0.46 96.53 2.38
A2-5 (ss) III Ag wire Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.37
0.18 0.69 0.52
Bright Inclusion 2 bdl bdl 0.55 bdl bdl 95.33 3.47 bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.35
0.08 95.47 0.20
B2 ssX18 III Pb wire Metal (phase 1) 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 95.74
0.02 6.27 0.16
0.02 80.33 0.10 18.91 0.09
Metal (phase 2) 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.45
0.00 0.99 0.00 0.55 0.01
Metal (phase 3) 2 0.02 bdl 66.35 bdl bdl 0.11 31.45 bdl bdl bdl 0.21 98.13
52
53
Table 3.5: Microprobe results for Period III:6 & Period III:5 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per. Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
0.06 0.07 97.18 2.27 0.10
Gd71-253 III Needle Metal 17 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.67
0.02 0.01 0.43 0.38 0.02
Bright Inclusion 3 bdl 0.04 49.16 0.30 0.23 bdl 37.65 1.30 7.42 bdl 0.23 96.32
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl 0.02 9.25 0.69 49.45 bdl 27.52 0.38 bdl bdl 0.04 87.35
Dark Inclusion 3 bdl 7.01 0.50 0.05 0.05 bdl 90.22 bdl 1.41 bdl 0.07 99.30
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl bdl 2.39 0.18 0.57 bdl 51.54 24.74 1.65 0.17 2.85 84.08
Metal in
1 bdl 0.03 5.06 0.70 62.90 bdl 14.78 0.34 0.74 bdl 0.11 84.65
corroded region
0.06 0.07 0.10 97.76 0.22 2.10 0.05
Gd71-19 III:6 Chisel Metal 12 bdl bdl bdl bdl 101.04
0.06 0.02 0.02 0.87 0.02 0.83 0.01
Dark Inclusion 1 bdl 0.05 bdl bdl bdl 0.06 59.24 25.05 1.26 bdl 0.04 85.70
Dark Inclusion 1 bdl 12.49 1.91 bdl bdl bdl 76.19 4.64 0.87 bdl bdl 96.10
Bright Inclusion 5 bdl 2.13 10.32 0.10 bdl 0.14 84.37 0.65 2.56 bdl 0.04 100.32
Metal in
3 bdl 0.33 bdl 0.06 0.05 26.71 66.84 0.13 1.38 bdl 0.05 95.53
corroded region
Metal in
2 0.05 7.30 65.09 bdl bdl bdl 3.27 bdl bdl bdl bdl 75.71
corroded region
Gd71-246 III:6 Chisel Metal 2 bdl bdl bdl 0.09 bdl 0.07 97.81 0.23 1.81 bdl 0.07 100.07
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl bdl bdl 0.09 bdl 0.12 96.59 0.28 3.07 bdl 0.05 100.19
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl 0.05 0.33 bdl bdl 0.06 93.55 3.02 1.61 bdl bdl 98.62
97.25 1.33 1.07 0.03
Gd71-318 III:6 Awl/Chisel Metal 12 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.77
0.86 0.65 0.20 0.01
Dark Inclusion 6 bdl 19.14 bdl bdl bdl bdl 71.74 8.37 1.13 bdl bdl 100.38
53
54
Table 3.5: Microprobe results for Period III:6 & Period III:5 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per. Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
0.18 98.45 1.36
10 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.02
Gd71-49 III:6 Wire Metal 0.03 0.49 0.22
2 0.03 0.59 0.40 0.05 bdl 0.22 84.00 0.04 1.14 bdl bdl 86.47
Dark Inclusion
2 0.03 0.33 2.30 1.30 0.04 0.11 61.00 0.74 5.95 bdl 0.06 71.84
Dark Inclusion
Metal in
3 bdl 0.03 bdl bdl bdl 28.07 45.67 0.03 0.69 bdl bdl 74.49
corroded region
0.04 0.13 0.08 96.30 0.78 2.96
10 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.33
Gd73-103 III:6 Pin Metal 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.18 0.07 0.27
4 bdl 4.84 bdl 0.06 0.07 0.07 88.18 1.87 2.32 bdl bdl 97.41
Dark inclusion
Metal in
3 0.04 0.16 bdl 0.06 0.30 50.97 42.04 0.27 0.78 bdl bdl 94.63
corroded region
0.03 0.05 0.12 95.88 0.25 3.02 0.04
13 bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.37
Gd71-73 III:6 Pin Metal 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.95 0.03 0.32 0.01
4 bdl 0.08 bdl 0.05 bdl 0.11 93.01 2.13 3.04 bdl 0.04 98.45
Dark Inclusion
Metal in
1 0.02 2.42 8.49 bdl bdl 0.18 32.34 0.07 0.70 bdl Bdl 44.22
corroded region
Metal in
1 bdl 0.06 bdl bdl bdl 31.82 49.04 bdl bdl bdl Bdl 80.92
corroded region
0.43 0.17 0.09 0.05 0.08 96.46 0.13 2.93 0.12
17 bdl bdl 100.46
Gd71-159 III:6 Pin Metal 0.70 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.03 0.36 0.01
2 bdl 0.61 2.71 0.08 bdl 0.07 92.06 0.19 3.15 bdl 0.12 98.98
Bright Inclusion
0.09 0.16 97.44 0.03 2.25
11 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.97
Gd73-68 III:6 Wire/Pin Metal 0.03 0.03 0.64 0.01 0.42
1 bdl 15.13 bdl bdl bdl 0.10 85.65 0.27 bdl bdl bdl 101.15
Dark Inclusion
Metal in
2 bdl 0.09 bdl bdl bdl 5.40 55.71 0.04 bdl bdl bdl 61.23
corroded region
54
55
Table 3.5: Microprobe results for Period III:6 & Period III:5 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per. Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
0.03 0.11 4.25 0.02 65.02 0.11 0.19
3 bdl bdl bdl bdl 69.83
* Gd67-126 III:6 Pin Metal 0.03 0.03 0.69 0.02 1.00 0.04 0.01
1 bdl bdl 2.85 0.11 3.91 0.09 61.54 0.10 bdl bdl 0.17 68.77
Bright Inclusion
2 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 0.14 100.26 bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.40
* Gd67-113 III:6 Pin Metal
2 bdl 0.18 bdl bdl bdl 35.59 40.74 bdl bdl bdl bdl 76.50
Bright Inclusion
0.03 0.36 0.06 0.10 96.84 0.07 2.72 0.13
24 bdl bdl bdl 100.30
Gd71-188 III:6 Needle Metal 0.01 0.25 0.01 0.02 0.53 0.01 0.29 0.01
2 bdl 1.18 0.91 bdl bdl 0.08 63.68 21.87 1.49 bdl 0.08 89.28
Dark Inclusion
3 0.04 3.54 1.57 bdl bdl 0.10 89.11 1.54 2.16 bdl 0.09 98.15
Dark Inclusion
4 0.03 0.05 12.79 0.06 bdl 0.15 83.65 0.07 2.94 bdl 0.12 99.86
Bright Inclusion
Metal in
3 bdl 0.80 0.24 0.16 bdl 78.74 22.14 0.73 1.31 bdl 0.03 104.15
corroded region
Metal (partially
2 0.40 0.12 6.69 0.16 bdl bdl 75.89 1.00 2.42 bdl bdl 86.68
Gd71-276 III:6 Needle mineralized)
Metal in
4 0.44 0.06 22.84 0.47 bdl bdl 25.31 7.84 10.76 bdl 0.04 67.76
corroded region
0.09 0.05 0.13 96.57 0.17 2.74
11 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.60
Gd73-109 III:6 Needle Metal 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.28 0.02 0.37
3 bdl bdl 0.18 bdl bdl 0.15 96.56 0.21 2.81 bdl bdl 99.91
Dark Inclusion
4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 0.15 96.31 0.17 3.00 bdl bdl 99.62
Bright Inclusion
Metal in
1 bdl bdl 0.31 bdl bdl 7.11 56.24 bdl bdl bdl bdl 63.66
corroded region
Metal in
1 0.13 0.25 32.89 0.24 bdl bdl 25.67 0.22 7.30 bdl bdl 66.70
corroded region
55
56
Table 3.5: Microprobe results for Period III:6 & Period III:5 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per. Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
Metal
Gd73-82 III:6 Needle 4 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.11 bdl bdl 66.38 0.26 8.20 bdl bdl 75.34
(mineralized)
Metal in
2 bdl 0.12 bdl 0.07 bdl 46.73 57.33 0.03 bdl bdl bdl 104.27
corroded region
0.09 0.15 96.62 0.16 2.35 0.06
Gd71-50 III:6 Needle Metal 10 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.43
0.02 0.03 0.57 0.02 0.25 0.01
Metal in
4 0.02 0.11 bdl 0.05 bdl 19.89 49.11 0.07 2.05 bdl bdl 71.30
corroded region
0.15 0.05 0.01 96.91 0.77 2.14
Gd71-207 III:6 Needle Metal 11 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.18
0.02 0.00 0.01 0.24 0.06 0.36
Dark Inclusion 4 bdl 0.42 bdl 0.07 bdl bdl 96.42 0.88 2.11 bdl 0.03 99.93
Metal in
1 0.03 7.74 64.76 bdl bdl bdl 9.04 bdl bdl bdl bdl 81.57
corroded region
2.93 0.13 97.10 0.16
* Gd67-117 III:6 Bracelet Metal 9 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.38
0.55 0.03 0.60 0.03
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl 11.55 0.25 bdl 1.17 0.07 76.37 2.04 bdl bdl bdl 91.44
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl bdl 0.96 bdl 3.04 0.20 95.04 0.13 bdl bdl bdl 99.37
Metal in
3 0.04 0.06 0.21 bdl 4.43 0.41 85.31 0.26 bdl bdl bdl 90.72
corroded region
0.21 0.07 2.40 0.08 94.36 2.17
* Gd67-102 III:6 Bracelet Metal 13 bdl bdl bdl bdl 0.12 99.41
0.02 0.01 0.34 0.01 1.73 0.26
Bright Inclusion 3 0.12 1.73 37.74 0.07 2.33 0.53 49.89 0.05 1.39 bdl 0.07 93.91
* Gd67-103 III:6 Bracelet Metal 2 bdl 0.04 bdl bdl 0.06 0.06 95.52 0.29 3.39 bdl 0.46 99.81
Dark Inclusion 4 bdl 21.48 0.26 bdl bdl bdl 72.74 4.69 1.05 bdl 0.07 100.28
Bright Inclusion 2 bdl 0.07 14.12 bdl bdl bdl 82.99 0.22 3.12 bdl 0.40 100.92
56
57
Table 3.5: Microprobe results for Period III:6 & Period III:5 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per. Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
0.01 0.07 1.33 0.27 93.70 1.08 3.02 0.76
* Gd67-104 III:6 Bracelet Metal 21 bdl bdl bdl 100.37
0.01 0.01 0.20 0.70 0.67 0.23 0.38 0.05
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl 14.64 0.45 0.06 0.58 bdl 76.02 6.66 1.65 bdl 0.33 100.39
Dark Inclusion 4 bdl 0.05 0.25 0.09 1.42 0.09 91.51 1.54 3.80 bdl 0.87 99.62
Bright Inclusion 4 0.03 0.08 4.11 0.09 1.57 0.09 90.05 0.91 3.19 bdl 0.85 100.97
Metal in
1 bdl bdl bdl 0.06 1.45 15.92 70.27 0.25 bdl bdl 0.06 88.01
corroded region
0.06 0.55 97.41 0.22 1.55
A1-347ss25 III:6 Nugget Metal 5 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.79
0.01 0.11 0.26 0.03 0.29
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl bdl 0.41 0.06 bdl 0.58 96.81 0.18 1.64 bdl Bdl 99.68
0.01 0.09 0.13 95.01 1.03 2.21
A1-351ss26 III:6 Nugget Metal 3 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 98.49
0.01 0.05 0.01 1.78 0.09 0.59
Fe-rich area 2 bdl 0.03 bdl 0.12 0.08 0.12 85.68 6.51 1.68 bdl bdl 94.21
Dark Inclusion 3 0.03 bdl bdl 0.16 0.05 0.18 93.58 1.72 2.52 bdl 0.04 98.27
0.11 96.83 3.21 0.01
A1-188ss9 III:5 Pin? Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.18
0.02 0.43 0.15 0.01
Dark Inclusion 3 bdl bdl bdl bdl 0.05 0.11 96.97 0.05 2.83 bdl 0.04 100.05
Bright Vein in
1 bdl bdl bdl 0.05 bdl 26.40 69.58 bdl 4.66 bdl 0.11 100.80
Metal
Metal in
1 bdl 0.14 bdl bdl bdl 15.99 54.14 bdl 1.01 bdl bdl 71.28
corroded region
The low totals in this table are most likely due to the presence of oxides and salts.
57
58
Three of the bracelets from Period III:6 (Gd67-102, Gd67-104, Gd67-117) have
addition, three of them exhibit equiaxed grains with annealing twins (Figure 3.20), and
There were two unidentifiable lumps of copper from this period (A1-347ss25, A1-
351ss26). The microstructure of A1-347ss25 is shown in Figure 3.22, and this Cu-
1.6wt%As-0.6wt%Ag alloy has been carefully worked into a curved shape. Its
morphology suggests that it may be part of a coil to a fibula pin, but due to its corroded
and fragmentary nature, this is very difficult to determine with any certainty.
This period only included one analyzed artifact (A1-188ss9), a Cu-3.2wt%As pin
containing no sulfide or lead inclusions (Table 3.5). It has similar microstructure to the
Period III:6 pins, but with a slightly more lamellar structure (Figure 3.23).
The six Period III:4 objects include three pins, two unidentifiable lumps, and a
thick crucible fragment, and their compositions are reported with those of Periods III:2
and Post III:2 in Table 3.6. Two of the pins (Gd71-141, Gd69-693) are Cu-As alloys
containing 2.6 3.5wt%As. The third pin (Gd69-558), though heavily corroded, contains
a high amount of Sn in the mineralized fabric (10wt%Sn). This high concentration is not
precise, due to the effects of corrosion products; nonetheless, the analysis does indicate
59
the presence of tin in the alloy. Gd71-141 and Gd69-693 show different microstructures
(Figure 3.24), with the former containing large worked and annealed grains, and the latter
The unidentifiable lumps (A1-69ss2, B1-38) both contain cast structures (Figure
3.25). A1-69ss2 is a dirty copper alloy with low amounts of As, Pb, Fe and Ni, and it
has a square cross-section. From the bent dendrites in the microstructure, one can deduce
that it was cast and subsequently worked into this shape. B1-38 shows a high degree of
microsegregation within the grains with highest solute concentration of 10wt%Sn near
the grain boundaries. This corresponds to the expected solute distribution according to
The crucible fragment from this period (AA2-193ss9, Appendix B, p.193) has
been determined to be a melting crucible based on its rounded open shape, low Fe
content, and microstructure (Figure 3.26). The microstructure is similar to that of B1-
510ss28 from Period VI:1. The oxide composition for this slag is reported in Table 3.7,
and it has a dolomitic composition, high in alkali content, and a 3.4 SiO2:Al2O3 ratio. In
(3.9wt%), but unfortunately, this composition does not match those for any of the
artifacts. Also it should be noted that the presence of Sn in this melting slag provides
strong evidence for the recycling of metal or ingots at Godin Tepe (see below, Chapter
4). A sample from this slag was also powdered for XRD, the results of which (shown in
Figure 3.27) reflect the contents of the vessel as well as the ceramic composition.
60
Table 3.6: Microprobe results for Period III:4, III:2 & Post III:2 Metals
Godin No. Per Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
0.15 96.86 0.10 2.66
Gd71-141 III:4 Pin Metal 16 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.82
0.14 0.51 0.03 0.25
Dark Inclusion 4 0.02 8.98 bdl bdl bdl bdl 88.32 1.45 1.54 bdl bdl 100.30
Completely
Gd69-558 III:4 Pin 1 bdl 0.04 bdl 0.09 10.43 bdl 69.66 0.24 bdl bdl bdl 80.46
mineralized
0.01 0.02 0.06 95.90 1.31 3.51
Gd69-693 III:4 Pin Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.87
0.01 0.02 0.01 1.81 0.88 0.84
Dark Inclusion 1 bdl 14.45 1.05 bdl bdl bdl 82.25 4.20 1.31 bdl bdl 103.26
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl 0.03 bdl bdl 0.78 2.59 80.73 1.18 2.23 bdl bdl 87.54
Scan of grain:
B1-38 III:4 Nugget 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 4.37 bdl 94.27 0.13 bdl bdl 0.15 98.92
center
Scan of grain 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 5.01 bdl 93.81 0.15 0.80 bdl 0.18 99.95
Scan of grain 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 5.97 bdl 92.46 0.14 bdl bdl 0.17 98.74
Scan of grain 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 6.80 bdl 91.67 0.15 0.91 bdl 0.15 99.68
Scan of grain 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 7.65 bdl 91.31 0.12 bdl bdl 0.14 99.22
Scan of grain 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 8.11 0.09 89.92 0.11 bdl bdl 0.15 98.38
Scan of grain 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 8.96 0.09 89.33 0.11 bdl bdl 0.14 98.63
Scan of grain 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 9.44 0.10 89.60 0.11 bdl bdl 0.15 99.40
Scan of grain 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 9.83 bdl 88.77 0.09 0.94 bdl 0.15 99.78
Scan of grain:
1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 10.20 0.09 88.51 0.09 1.05 bdl 0.15 100.09
grain boundary
60
61
Table 3.6: Microprobe results for Period III:4, III:2 & Post III:2 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
7.63 0.09 90.97 0.12 0.93 0.15
B1-38 III:4 Nugget grain average 10 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.89
2.05 0.00 2.06 0.02 0.10 0.01
Dark Inclusion 2 0.02 13.97 0.17 bdl 2.78 bdl 79.46 5.57 bdl bdl 0.06 102.02
Bright Inclusion 3 bdl 0.18 33.14 bdl 6.32 0.19 64.84 0.16 bdl bdl 0.11 104.95
0.02 0.03 0.06 0.09 97.06 0.16 2.20 0.17
A1-69ss2 III:4 Nugget Metal 5 bdl bdl bdl 100.01
0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 1.02 0.02 0.43 0.02
0.05 0.13 10.88 83.80 0.04 3.91 0.22
AA2-193ss9 III:4 Crucible Prill 1 5 bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.23
0.05 0.03 0.71 1.70 0.03 1.06 0.02
0.03 0.16 1.46 0.07 96.05 0.56 1.80 0.36
Gd69-694 III:2 Chisel Metal 26 bdl bdl bdl 100.50
0.00 0.01 0.17 0.01 0.42 0.02 0.32 0.02
Dark Inclusion 4 bdl 9.63 0.43 bdl 0.80 bdl 83.65 3.55 1.58 bdl 0.23 99.86
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl 0.04 30.30 bdl 1.19 bdl 69.34 0.53 1.61 bdl 0.24 103.25
0.05 0.22 0.01 0.01 93.19 0.34 6.07
C2-112ss10 III:2 Chisel Metal 5 bdl bdl bdl bdl 101.06
0.05 0.22 0.01 0.01 1.27 0.51 0.44
Gd67-202 III:2 Dagger Bright Inclusion 4 0.03 0.06 bdl bdl 33.30 bdl 31.20 0.49 bdl bdl bdl 65.07*
Metal (near
AA2-176ss5 III:2 Blade 2 0.08 0.07 bdl 0.12 45.16 bdl 15.80 0.43 0.74 bdl 0.05 62.44*
corrosion)
0.20 0.05 0.02 13.50 66.17 0.17
Metal 3 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 80.13*
0.05 0.03 0.02 3.49 4.51 0.02
Metal in
1 0.02 bdl bdl bdl 6.67 74.35 5.03 0.08 bdl bdl bdl 86.15*
corroded region
Gd67-237 III:2 Blade Metal tip 2 0.02 bdl bdl bdl 9.16 bdl 86.91 0.08 1.50 bdl 0.45 98.11
Metal center 3 Bdl bdl bdl bdl 7.47 0.07 90.49 0.08 1.00 bdl 0.43 99.54
Bright Inclusion 2 Bdl 0.05 1.13 0.05 15.96 bdl 68.55 0.13 1.61 bdl 0.61 88.08
*These low totals are due to the heavy corrosion of these samples. In addition, the high Sn does not reflect the original alloy composition and has been inflated
through corrosion processes during burial.
61
62
Table 3.6: Microprobe results for Period III:4, III:2 & Post III:2 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
Intergranular
Gd67-237 III:2 Blade 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 7.82 5.52 84.90 0.09 bdl bdl 0.44 98.77
Inclusion
0.01 99.95 0.09 0.04
Gd67-201 III:2 Arrowhead Metal 5 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.13
0.01 0.54 0.02 0.01
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl 0.35 bdl bdl 0.06 bdl 98.17 0.83 bdl bdl bdl 99.41
2.20 0.05 1.99 93.31 0.09 1.20 0.47
Gd67-196 III:2 Armor-plate Metal 3 bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.41
2.99 0.05 0.92 4.03 0.01 0.24 0.07
Dark Inclusion 3 bdl bdl bdl bdl 1.71 bdl 94.14 0.09 0.92 bdl 0.42 97.26
5.24 92.61 0.40 1.17
AA2-154ss1 III:2 Wire Metal 5 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.41
0.67 1.57 0.06 0.13
Dark Inclusion 3 0.07 bdl bdl bdl 4.02 bdl 94.41 0.43 bdl bdl bdl 98.92
0.68 0.21 8.43 89.21 0.06 0.95
Gd67-207 III:2 Pin Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.53
0.21 0.03 0.51 0.54 0.01 0.03
Dark Inclusion 3 bdl 3.51 0.47 0.18 7.35 bdl 88.18 0.18 0.90 bdl 0.86 101.63
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl bdl 1.96 0.24 8.24 bdl 87.81 0.05 0.94 bdl 1.01 100.25
0.02 0.02 9.39 89.58 0.15 0.22
Gd67-215 III:2 Pin Metal 3 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.45
0.02 0.02 1.39 1.31 0.02 0.01
Bright Inclusion 2 0.03 0.03 3.19 bdl 8.45 bdl 86.32 0.15 0.80 bdl 0.18 99.14
Gd67-219 III:2 Pin Metal 2 bdl bdl bdl bdl 4.66 0.09 93.58 0.16 1.23 bdl 0.25 99.96
Bright Inclusion 3 bdl bdl 1.93 bdl 4.87 0.15 92.23 0.13 0.97 bdl 0.25 100.53
0.25 8.68 0.11 90.64 0.06 0.03
M'B #5 III:2 Pin Metal 12 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.84
0.15 0.39 0.01 0.77 0.02 0.01
Sn-rich
5 bdl 0.03 bdl bdl 11.13 0.10 83.12 0.20 bdl bdl 0.04 94.61
inclusions
62
63
Table 3.6: Microprobe results for Period III:4, III:2 & Post III:2 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
0.09 0.47 0.09 97.67 1.01 0.04
Gd67-224 III:2 Anklet Metal 3 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.37
0.04 0.13 0.03 0.16 0.13 0.01
Dark Inclusion 1 bdl 11.45 bdl 0.08 0.64 0.06 87.74 bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.97
Bright Inclusion 1 0.06 16.19 0.17 0.33 4.95 bdl 71.33 0.04 0.96 bdl 0.03 94.06
0.19 0.01 5.04 0.06 93.32 0.07 1.27 0.30
Gd67-231 III:2 Bracelet Metal 5 bdl bdl bdl 101.08
0.19 0.01 0.84 0.01 0.85 0.01 0.32 0.02
Dark Inclusion 6 bdl 3.22 0.23 0.06 4.21 bdl 91.09 0.41 1.05 bdl 0.27 100.54
Bright Inclusion 9 bdl 0.13 2.32 bdl 5.76 0.06 91.43 0.06 0.99 bdl 0.34 101.09
A1-40 (ss) III:2 Tuyere Prill 1 1 0.04 0.03 bdl bdl 30.04 bdl 40.06 0.08 bdl bdl 0.04 70.29
Prill 2 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl Bdl bdl 98.53 2.87 bdl bdl 0.10 101.50
Prill 3 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl Bdl bdl 98.36 4.34 bdl bdl bdl 102.70
Post Arrow/ 0.01 98.99 0.37 0.04
Gd67-450 Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.43
III:2 Spearhead 0.01 0.28 0.03 0.01
Dark Inclusion 1 bdl 3.10 bdl bdl bdl bdl 89.99 0.55 bdl bdl bdl 93.64
Post Arrow/ 0.24 98.52 0.51 0.93
Gd67-452 Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.20
III:2 Spearhead 0.03 0.33 0.07 0.20
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl 10.08 0.57 0.13 bdl bdl 80.71 6.25 bdl bdl 0.04 97.77
Bright Inclusion 1 bdl 10.96 6.67 0.14 bdl bdl 77.37 3.68 bdl bdl bdl 98.82
Bright Inclusion 3 0.02 0.06 1.02 0.25 bdl bdl 97.64 0.54 1.09 bdl bdl 100.62
63
64
Table 3.6: Microprobe results for Period III:4, III:2 & Post III:2 Metals (continued)
Godin No. Per Object Notes n P S Pb Sb Sn Ag Cu Fe As Zn Ni Total
Post 0.03 0.04 0.06 98.65 0.32 0.04
Gd67-455 Spearhead Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.32
III:2 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.01
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl 14.33 bdl bdl bdl bdl 82.03 2.56 bdl bdl bdl 98.92
Post 0.01 8.97 89.61 0.17 0.79 0.39
Gd67-453 Bracelet Metal 5 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.96
III:2 0.01 0.09 0.59 0.02 0.03 0.01
Dark Inclusion 4 0.03 8.23 bdl bdl 5.14 0.37 81.74 0.11 1.07 bdl 0.22 96.90
Bright Inclusion 4 0.05 0.75 67.06 bdl 3.49 0.80 29.46 0.18 0.76 bdl 0.13 102.68
Dark Needles 1 3.35 2.80 54.72 0.75 25.71 10.74 0.06 2.22 0.21 100.56
Bright Needles 1 1.14 4.05 55.95 6.51 15.32 9.78 0.19 6.91 0.16 100.00
Tuyere
A1-40 (ss) III:2 Matrix 2 0.53 0.55 43.02 8.63 4.12 21.67 0.09 16.51 0.75 95.87
fragment
Darker Matrix 2 0.39 17.10 59.43 0.08 25.14 0.07 bdl 1.84 0.49 104.54
Lighter Matrix
1 0.27 0.09 12.00 4.00 5.33 5.18 0.21 63.17 4.47 94.71
(region 1)
Lighter Matrix
1 0.00 0.34 1.44 1.82 8.18 0.48 0.12 75.48 2.83 90.69
(region 2)
64
65
This is in contrast to the other technical ceramic XRD spectra since the previous two
XRD samples were taken from exterior (non-slag) surfaces. The presence of geerite
(Cu8S5) in the XRD spectrum is not surprising since we have already seen the presence of
sulfur and copper in the entrapped prills. Geerite is likely a product of the weathering of
this sample though could be a remnant of an unreacted ore fragment if this is actually a
smelting, rather than melting crucible. Further investigation is necessary to clarify this
point.
The objects analyzed from this period include seven utilitarian items (chisels,
blades, arrowhead, etc), five pins/wires, two pieces of jewelry, and a single tuyere (Table
3.6). The chisels (Gd69-694 and C2-112ss10) are shown in Figure 3.28. Gd69-694 is
evidence of heavy working. However, C2-112ss10 has a much different structure. One
of two possibilities may account for this. Either this artifact was misclassified as a chisel,
considering that it does not actually contain a chisel edge or, because it was sampled
from the center of the chisel rather than the tip, this different microstructure may just
indicate that the chisel is heavily annealed at the center and only cold-worked at the tip to
The weapons are all from burial contexts, and the two blades (Gd67-237, AA2-
176ss5) and the dagger (Gd67-202) are all Cu-Sn alloys ranging from 9 15wt%Sn.
Gd67-202 is heavily corroded and therefore the high Sn content does not reflect the true
66
composition of this artifact. Only Gd67-237 contained enough metal for microstructural
analysis (Figure 3.29). This blade has been worked and annealed. The aspect ratio of the
elongated sulfide inclusions is approximately 12:1, indicating that this artifact was
heavily worked to achieve the flat edge. The armor-plate (Gd67-196) with a Cu-Sn-S-As
alloy and the arrowhead (Gd67-201) of 99wt%Cu, are similar in their microstructures
(Figure 3.30a,b). Both have large annealed grains with elongated nonmetallic inclusions
that indicate heavy working to achieve the final shape of the object. These structures are
highly desirable for the high-toughness applications for which these implements could
The pins are all Cu-Sn alloys containing 4.7 9.4wt%Sn. Two pins are much
more ornate in style (Gd67-215, Gd67-219), and they come from the same burial. They
are similar in style and microstructure (Figure 3.31), with 25m grains and some
annealing twins, but Gd67-215 has double the tin content (9.3 vs. 4.7wt%Sn). Because
higher tin content yields a more golden color, this difference in composition may reflect a
desire to have a pair of pins of slightly different color (see Chapter 4). Gd67-207 was
mentioned above (Figure 3.16), and the other two samples of pins/wire (AA2-154ss1,
The jewelry from this period includes a low-Sn-As copper alloy (Gd67-224,
anklet) and a 5wt%Sn bronze alloy (Gd67-231, bracelet). Gd67-231 contains a remnant
cast structure that can be seen at low magnification; however, at higher magnification, the
annealed grains are visible (Figure 3.33). This reflects the inability of Sn to re-distribute
rapidly in the structure during annealing events. In addition, the edge of the cross-section
67
for this bracelet shows slip lines from use-wear. Both of these points are discussed below
in Chapter 4.
The tuyere from Period III:2 (A1-40, Appendix B, p.201) is highly refractory and
contains very little vitrified material at its interior surface. In fact, most of the surface is
merely reduced and shows no signs of high heat aside from the few copper prills. These
prills had drastically different compositions ranging from very high Sn (30wt%) to Cu-
4wt%Fe. It is possible that this tuyere was reused and the different prills represent
different alloy compositions of individual melting events (see Chapter 4). In addition to
the microprobe analysis of the oxide composition (Table 3.7), a sample from the external
surface of the tuyere was powdered for XRD analysis. Figures 3.34 and 3.35 show that it
is almost identical to the spectrum for A01-50ss40 (the furnace fragment from Period
VI:1). This may be an indication of similar clay source material for crucible
Four artifacts from Period Post III:2 were sampled. These were all from burial
contexts and include three spearheads (Gd67-450, Gd67-452, Gd67-455) and a bracelet
(Gd67-453). The arrowheads were found in the same burial and are all at least
98.5wt%Cu (Table 3.6). Their microstructures suggest, however, that they were
manufactured with different purposes in mind (Figure 3.36). Gd67-450 and Gd67-452
contain elongated inclusions, slip lines and flattened grains, whereas Gd67-455 has been
worked (indicated by the presence of elongated inclusion) but was subsequently annealed
68
to achieve a more ductile material. This coarse structure is well-suited to the demands of
a projectile point, but the other spearheads are better suited for cutting or slicing
reported samples such as Gd67-102 and Gd67-103 from Period III:6 (Figure 3.37), but
This period marks the first appearance of iron at Godin Tepe. The chisels and
blades only appear in iron, but the arrowheads as well as the decorative items are all
made of copper alloys. Most of the iron implements were too heavily corroded for
sampling, but compositions for one corroded chisel (Gd67-65) and a small nugget (A3-
313ss5) are reported in Table 3.8 along with the rest of the Period II metal. The copper
alloy artifacts from this period included an arrowhead, a tang, a bracelet (Gd69-215), an
The arrowhead (Gd69-729) and tang (EE01-1) are both Cu-As alloys. The tang
has an annealed, coarse structure, and the arrowhead is heavily workedsimilar to Gd67-
452 and Gd67-450 from Period Post III:2 (Figure 3.38). The pins range in composition,
but Gd71-344 and Gd71-343 are of particular interest because they are so similar. They
have almost identical compositions and microstructures (Figure 3.39), and both are
broken and from the same locus. Therefore, it is highly likely that these two samples are
actually two broken pieces of the same pin. Of the other four pins, one is mostly
69
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl 0.37 bdl bdl bdl 0.20 98.17 0.58 bdl bdl bdl 99.31
97.59 2.31 0.03
EE01-1 Tang Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.92
0.41 0.11 0.00
0.01 0.08 7.92 0.10 90.81 0.06 0.33
Gd69-215 Bracelet Metal 14 bdl bdl bdl bdl 99.48
0.01 0.02 0.71 0.02 0.64 0.01 0.02
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl 13.66 0.62 0.06 3.27 0.06 79.52 1.81 bdl 1.21 0.15 100.36
Dark Inclusion 1 bdl 1.40 1.59 0.05 6.14 bdl 70.65 12.83 bdl 0.12 0.24 93.02
Bright Inclusion 5 0.03 0.15 81.00 bdl 1.76 0.17 16.91 0.04 bdl bdl 0.07 100.13
Metal in corrosion
9 bdl bdl 0.83 0.12 12.53 44.99 35.12 0.17 bdl bdl 0.28 94.02
product
0.02 1.15 0.13 97.63 0.49 1.08 0.25
Gd71-343 Pin Metal 3 bdl bdl bdl bdl 100.78
0.02 0.03 0.04 0.74 0.03 0.17 0.02
Dark Inclusion 3 bdl 20.49 0.41 bdl 0.21 0.09 71.07 6.64 bdl bdl 0.05 98.96
Bright Inclusion 3 bdl 5.13 35.65 0.06 0.93 0.88 57.62 0.87 1.06 bdl 0.20 102.40
Metal in corrosion
5 bdl 0.05 0.14 0.08 1.46 40.81 57.74 0.32 1.25 bdl 0.14 101.98
product
Gd71-344 Pin Metal 2 bdl 0.03 0.16 0.08 1.14 0.15 96.44 0.44 0.89 bdl 0.21 99.54
Dark Inclusion 2 bdl 19.01 0.27 bdl 0.35 bdl 71.78 6.67 bdl bdl 0.10 98.17
69
70
Gd71-344 Pin Bright Inclusion 2 bdl 0.03 24.78 0.05 1.03 0.13 63.15 0.34 bdl bdl 0.16 89.66
Metal in corrosion
1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 0.62 6.26 92.52 0.15 bdl bdl 0.07 99.62
product
Gd69-216 Pin Metal 2 bdl bdl bdl 0.49 7.48 0.09 90.05 bdl 1.60 bdl 0.04 99.73
Gd73-419 Pin Metal 4 bdl 0.06 0.17 bdl Bdl bdl 97.11 0.44 1.59 bdl 0.27 99.63
Dark Inclusion 4 bdl 18.37 1.02 bdl Bdl bdl 68.82 7.23 bdl bdl 0.05 95.49
Bright Inclusion 2 0.02 0.20 54.10 bdl Bdl bdl 44.20 2.36 1.83 bdl 0.13 102.83
Gd69-461 Pin Metal 3 bdl 3.14 0.26 bdl Bdl bdl 69.66 0.28 14.92 0.06 bdl 88.32
CC2 ss3 Nugget Metal 7 bdl bdl 0.17 bdl Bdl 0.08 99.25 bdl bdl bdl 0.24 99.73
Grain Boundary 3 bdl bdl 0.17 0.08 Bdl 0.14 98.50 bdl 0.81 bdl 0.17 99.87
Metal (mostly
CC2 ss3 Pin 1 bdl bdl bdl bdl 1.73 bdl 51.60 0.02 bdl bdl bdl 53.35
mineralized)
A3-
Fe piece Metal 4 bdl bdl bdl bdl Bdl 0.05 0.08 99.68 bdl bdl 0.07 99.87
313ss521
70
71
mineralized (CC2ss3-pin), but contains 1.7wt%Sn. One pin (Gd69-216) is quite high in
to the compositional variability, the microstructures (Figure 3.40) range from fine-
grained (Gd73-419) to coarse with annealing twins (Gd69-461 and Gd67-216). The
bracelet (Gd69-215) is high tin-bronze, but very similar in microstructure to many of the
The metal artifacts from Godin Tepe reflect a wide variety of compositions and
microstructures, ranging from Cu-As to Cu-Sn and Cu-Fe, and from as-cast, dendritic
structures to heavily cold-worked to heavily annealed structures. Even within the same
period, typologically similar items often have quite different microstructures (e.g., Gd67-
104 and Gd67-102, Figures 3.21 and 3.20a, respectively). In addition, the appearance of
tin at Godin Tepe is well-marked by burial items during Period III:6 and in non-burial
contexts during Period III:4. Iron first appears in Period II and it completely replaces
copper as the metal of choice for blades and chisels. Copper alloys are still present in
Processing debris from Godin Tepe, though small in quantity, provides strong
evidence for smelting, melting or recycling, and casting of copper alloys during Periods
VI:1, IV, III:4 and III:2. The majority of the production debris comes from the earlier
periods and is absent during Period II; however, even at the height of production, one
would be hard-pressed to call this on-site manufacture anything more than a cottage-
level industry. In general, the results and scarcity of finds presented here provide a
72
detailed view of the metallurgical activity at Godin Tepe. In order to appreciate fully the
significance of these results, however, one must place Godin Tepes metallurgy in the
Figure 3.1 Metallographic section of Gd73-312, Period IV:1, object fragment, etched. Inclusions are
Cu-As-S. The as -cast structure is clearly visible with a secondary dendrite arm spacing of approxi-
mately 29.7m.
Figure 3.2 Optical light micrograph of B1-510ss28 Period IV:1, melting slag.
74
Figure 3.3 XRD spectrum for A01-34 ss29, Period IV, Ore fragment. In addition to the gangue, this
sample contains cuprite and iron oxides, and possibly delafossite.
75
Figure 3.4 Metallographic section of Gd71-261, Period IV, blade at low (a) and high (b) magnifica-
tion, etched. There is a preserved cast structure, though the blade has been worked as revealed by the
deformed dendrites. With a SDAS of approximately 81.7m, this structure is coarser than that for the
object depicted in Figure 3.1.
76
B2-351ssX25, Nugget
Figure 3.5 Metallographic section of B2-351ssX25, Period IV, Nugget. B2-351ssX25 is a lump of
processing material; however, it is almost entirely corroded. Fortunately the microstructure is well-
preseved, and one can see dendrites with a secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS) of 55.2m.
A1-1109ss511, prill
Figure 3.9 Metallographic section of A1-1109ss511, Period IV, prill from smelting slag, etched. The
blue-grey zones are the As-Sb-rich regions.
80
Figure 3.10 XRD spectrum for A1-1123ss521, Period IV, Ore fragment. This sample contains copper
carbonate and chalcopyrite.
81
Figure 3.11 Metallographic section of Gd65-33, Period III, chisel at low (a) and high (b) magnifica-
tion, etched. This chisel has been heavily worked to achieve the laminated structure and high aspect
ratio Cu-Fe-S inclusions (indicated by arrow). The aspect ratio of inclusions range from approxi-
mately 40:1 to 3:1.
82
Deformed tip
with slip lines
Figure 3.12 Metallographic section of B2ss1, Period III, chisel at the tip (a) and nearer to the center
(b) of the tool, etched. This chisel has also been heavily worked, though the laminated structure is
much less apparent than the previous examples. A slight variation in the composition can be seen
where the arrow indicates a darker stained region. The high aspect ratio (10-40:1) of the Cu-Pb-S in-
clusions, and the many slip lines farther from the chisel tip (b), reveal the considerable work-
hardening that this chisel must have undergone. In addition, the deformation and multiple slip lines at
the tip show that this object was certainly used as a tool.
83
Figure 3.13 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd71-153, Needle, (b) A2-5 and (c) B2ssX18, Wires, Pe-
riod III, etched. (a) The needle has a fine-grained microstructures with elongated Cu-Pb and Cu-S
inclusions and annealing twins. (b) A2-5 is a silver wire with large annealed grains. (c) B2ssX18 is of
lead with a similar microstructure, but containing inclusions of copper (indicated by white arrow).
84
Figure 3.14 Metallographic section of Gd73-73, Period III, arrowhead, etched. The high aspect ratio
of the Cu-Fe-S inclusions (indicated by arrow) shows that this arrowhead was worked; however, the
grains are not elongated in the direction of the inclusions. The few annealing twins indicates that an-
nealing did take place, but the variability in size and shape of the grains shows that this annealing
event was not sufficient to allow full recrystallization of the grains.
85
(c) Gd71-19
86
Figure 3.16 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd67-113, Period III:6 (b) Gd67-207, Period III:2, Pins,
etched. Both pins exhibit a fine-grained structure with annealing twins and rounded cuprite (a) and
copper sulfide (b) inclusions.
87
Figure 3.17 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd73-103, (b) Gd67-126, (c) Gd73-68, and (d) Gd71-159,
Period III:6, etched. The top micrographs (a and b) show that these pins have been worked and an-
nealed. There are slip lines as well as annealing twins indicated on the micrograph with arrows. (c)
and (d) are similar, but with larger grains. The inclusions seen here are copper sulfide (a,c) and Cu-Pb
(b,d).
88
Figure 3.18 Metallographic sections of (a) Gd73-109, (b) Gd71-188, (c) Gd7149, (d) Gd71-50, Period
III:6, etched. (a) Gd73-109 has been worked and annealed, and is quite similar to Gd71-188 (b) but
with a slightly larger grainsize. In addition, the copper sulfide inclusions of Gd71-188 (b) are slightly
more elongated and aligned than the cuprite inclusions of Gd73-109 (a). (c) Gd71-49 and (d) Gd71-50
both exhibit larger grains and are shown here in polarized light to emphasize the grain boundaries.
89
(c) Gd67-117
91
Figure 3.21: Metallographic section of Gd67-104, Period III:6, bracelet, etched. This bracelet has a
well-preserved cast structure. The orientation of the dendrites show that the bracelet cooled at the
edges first (consistent with a closed mold). The dendrites are also slightly deformed, indicated minor
re-shaping and working after cooling. The average SDAS for this bracelet is 64.9m, but it is more
irregular toward the center.
92
Figure 3.23: Metallographic sections of A1-188ss9 at (a) low and (b) high magnification, Pin, Period
III:5, etched. This pin shows some lamination (a) as well as annealing twins (b), and it is very similar
to Gd71-50 and Gd71-207 from Period III:6 (Figures 3.18 and 3.19)
94
Figure 3.24: Metallographic sections of (a) Gd71-141, (b) Gd69-693 Period III:4, etched. Gd71-141
(a) shows a sequence of work-hardening, annealing (annealing twins), and additional hardening (slip
lines). However, Gd69-693 (c) is much finer-grained without annealing twins or slip lines. Both pins
contained rounded copper sulfide inclusions.
95
(a) A1-69ss2
(b) A1-69ss2
(c) B1-38
96
Figure 3.26: Optical light micrograph of AA2-193ss9 Period III:4, melted technical ceramic.
97
Figure 3.27: XRD spectrum of AA2-193ss9, melted technical ceramic, Period III:4. This slag is a potas-
sium magnesium silicate with cuprite and geerite.
98
Figure 3.29: Metallographic sections of Gd67-237, Blade, Period III:2, etched. This blade has been
worked (elongated Cu-Pb-S inclusions) and subsequently annealed (equiaxed-grains and annealing
twins).
100
Figure 3.30: Metallographic sections of (a) Gd67-196, Armor-plate, (b) Gd67-201, Arrowhead, Period
III:2, etched. These have similar microstructures showing heavy working indicated by the elongated
copper sulfide inclusions followed by an extensive annealing event to promote grain growth..
101
Figure 3.31: Metallographic sections of (a) Gd67-215, (b) Gd67-219, Period III:2, etched. Gd67-215 (a)
and Gd67-219 (b) have similar microstructures, showing equiaxed grains and annealing twins. These
micrographs also show heavy intergranular corrosion.
102
Figure 3.32: Metallographic sections of (a)AA2-154ss1, and (b) MB1 #5, Period III:2, etched. (a) This
wire is fine-grained with slight working and annealing; whereas MB1 #5 (b) has larger grains and elon-
gated inclusions.
103
Figure 3.33: Metallographic sections of Gd67-231, Period III:2, Bracelet, etched. This bracelet has a
preserved cast structure with a SDAS of 84.8m. It also shows work-hardening or use-wear at the sur-
face, as seen with the slip lines (b).
104
Figure 3.35: XRD spectrum of A01-50ss40, Period VI:1, Crucible fragment. This ceramic has a similar
composition to the Tuyere (A1-40) and both contain anorthite.
106
Figure 3.37: Metallographic sections of Gd67-453, Period Post III:2, Bracelet, etched. This bracelet
has been worked and annealed., and is similar in microstructure to those of previous periods.
108
Figure 3.38: Metallographic sections of (a) EE01-1 and (b) Gd67-729, Period II, etched. (a) The tang
has been minimally worked and fully annealed, but (b) the arrowhead is similar to the two heavily
worked examples from the Period Post III:2 burial (Fig. 3.36) with elongated Cu-Fe-S inclusions.
109
Figure 3.39: Metallographic sections of (a) Gd71-343 and (b) Gd71-344, Period II, Pins, etched. These
pins have almost identical microstructures as well as similar compositions, supporting the conclusion
that they are two pieces of the same pin that were separated during excavation (see Chapter 4 for discus-
sion of this).
110
Figure 3.40: Metallographic sections of (a) Gd69-216, (b) Gd69-461, (c,d) Gd73-419, Period II, Pins,
etched. These pins have different size grains, but have each undergone similar working and annealing
episodes. The only pin with remnant cast structure is Gd73-419 (d).
111
Figure 3.41: Metallographic sections of Gd69-215, Bracelet, Period II, etched. This bracelet shows
evidence of working and annealing (twins and slip lines), but no preserved cast structure as seen in
other bracelets.
112
details of the local metal production occurring at Godin Tepe, and the metal artifacts
fully appreciate the extent of this technology, it is necessary to consider all aspects of the
artifacts, and distribution, use, and discarding of objects. This chapter considers these six
stages in relation to the finds from Godin Tepe and discusses the presence of
typologically similar artifacts in the surrounding region. Here, production of metal and
the manufacture of artifacts are considered at both the local and regional scale.
Eight crucible/furnace fragments, two ore fragments, two molds (one of which is
wholly intact), and a tuyere fragment provide irrefutable evidence that the inhabitants of
Godin Tepe manufactured and manipulated copper as early as Period VI:1 (3300-3050
BCE). Unfortunately the scale of this production and processing is unclear as a result of
limited archaeological data, the lack of localized workshop debris, and the absence of
relatively extensive with crucibles appearing throughout a 30x30 meter area in the center
of the mound. As discussed in Chapter 1, the main excavation of this mound covers an
113
area of 120 by 50 meters. The contexts of all processing materials are shown in Figure
4.1. All metallurgical materials occur as individual finds scattered through squares A01,
Figure 4.1: Plan map for Godin Tepe central mound with grid and metallurgical finds indicated
(adapted from Young and Levine 1974).
The preliminary reports on Godin Tepe (Young 1969; Young and Levine 1974)
and summary articles (Young 1968, 1969, 1972, 1974) do not mention any workshop
areas or furnace installations that would suggest that these loci were the focus of metal
production, nor was any such possibility suggested by Cuyler Young concerning
presence of molds, crucibles, and slag indicate onsite processing, suggesting that either
metal production and artifact manufacture at Godin Tepe was a small-scale household
activity, or that metal was produced and fabricated outside the areas excavated. The
small number of crucible, slag, and furnace fragments cannot account for the scale of
114
production required to produce all of the metal artifacts at Godin Tepe, and therefore
imported metal and artifacts must have augmented the production taking place at Godin
Tepe.
metallurgy help to determine the nature of production at Godin Tepe. The details of this
local production are considered in the context of the manufacturing processes, beginning
with raw material acquisition, processing setup, firing temperatures, cooling rates, alloy
is traversed by the High Road (east-west) and at least three major north-south roads used
for long-distance trade in antiquity (Henrickson 1986:3 and Chapter 1 of this thesis).
Godin Tepe lies along the High Road half-way between modern-day Kermanshah and
Hamadan. The neighboring copper deposits range from small copper carbonate veins to
complex systems of polymetallic ores* (Bazin and Hubner 1969; Kishvar 1965). A few
of these ore deposits lie within 150 km of Godin Tepe, but many more lie farther east
along the High Road leading to Tehran and Tepe Hissar (Figure 4.2). The Godin Tepe
*
Copper ore deposits can be divided into three zones that consist mainly of (1) copper oxides and
carbonates that are easily smelted, (2) copper-arsenic ores that are dangerous but still easily smelted, and
(3) complex polymetallic ores containing Cu and Fe sulfides that are more difficult to process and often
require intermediate roasting steps.
115
Hamadan
Godin Tepe
Kermanshah
High Road
200 km
Figure 4.2: Map showing ore deposits (numbered), High Road (dotted line) and Godin Tepe
(adapted from Bazin and Hubner 1969 and Henrickson 1986).
inhabitants may have retrieved their ore from these sources; others may have exploited
the more distant deposits and brought raw material to Godin along the trade routes. The
deposit closest to Godin Tepe, Shirvaneh (deposit number 214 in Figure 4.2), contains
chalcopyrite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, malachite and azurite as veinlets in a quartz and calcite
gangue (Bazin and Hubner 1969:Pl.24). Vali Mohamad (deposit 70) contains the same
minerals plus limonitea mixture of iron hydroxides including goethite, which tends to
stain the malachite and azurite brown (Bernard and Hyrsl 2004:354)as a network of
lenses and veins in a quartz gangue (Bazin and Hubner 1969:Pl.15). Recall that XRD
analyses revealed ore sample A01-34ss29 consists of cuprite, goethite, and quartz, and
116
ore sample A1-1123ss521 consists of chalcopyrite, copper carbonate and quartz (Figures
4.3 and 4.10). Of the two deposits, Vali Mohamad (deposit 70) is the more likely source
for these two ores because, in addition to containing all minerals detected by XRD, it is
Hamadan, along one of the north-south roads to Susa. These deposits (71 and 72) are
tetrahedrite, bornite and chalcopyrite. They may have been too far for the local
exploitation by Godin Tepe craftsmen, but the selected and pre-ground arsenic-copper-
sulfide ores could have been transported in small quantities or at least exploited by major
Another raw material required in these small scale smelting operations is fuel.
Both charcoal and dung can be used as a fuel source (Miller 1984). Though dung is not
the best choice for metallurgical activity because of the high temperatures and carbon-
rich fuel required for the process (Horne 1982:9). If using charcoal (the most efficient
fuel for copper production), 20 g of fuel are required to produce 1 g of copper metal from
a relatively pure oxide ore (Horne 1982:12). The processing and efficiency required to
produce charcoal made it more expensive than many other fuels; nonetheless, it was
probably used for the small-scale smelting operations at Godin Tepe. The nearby oak
forests (Sahab 1963) as well as the large-scale charcoal production to the south (Horne
1982:10) would provide an ample supply of carbon-rich fuel. In addition, with multiple
clay sources available locally in the Kermanshah area (Dewan and Famouri 1964) and
distinguished local ceramic production going back to the Neolithic period at nearby Seh
117
Gabi (Vandiver 1985; Young and Levine 1974), suitable clay for crucibles would not be
hard to find.
The crucibles at Godin Tepe provide information regarding the smelting setup
and post-smelting cooling rate. This gives a detailed picture of the process employed and
The shape, size, and quantity of the technical ceramics reinforce the conclusion of
small scale smelting events. Based on the thickness (3cm, Appendix B p.171) and
Period VI:1); however it is the only such fragment and most others clearly are part of
crucibles or tuyeres. The crucibles are shallow, bowl-like vessels with heavy vitrification
at the rim, a reduced body, and copper corrosion products along the interior surfaces
(pictured in Appendix B). This shape and size is typical of pit smelting operations.
Figure 4.3 shows the basic setup for pit smelting, where a crucible would be placed in a
shallow pit and charged with crushed ore and charcoal. This setup is ideal for small-scale
production. Smelting copper requires temperatures of at least 600-700oC for very pure
copper carbonate ore (Charles 1979), but temperatures over 1000oC are necessary for less
pure ores and for casting many copper-base alloys. Such high temperatures require a
Earth
The crucibles from Godin Tepe contain a large amount of chaff (vegetal material),
which would burn off during firing to increase the porosity of the ceramic and therefore
increase the insulating property of the crucible (Rice 1987:351). Examples of chaff-
tempered clay for use in smelting operations have been noted elsewhere on the Iranian
Plateau (Tal-i Iblis, Frame 2004, Pigott and Lechtman 2001; and Tepe Hissar, Pigott
1989). However, high porosity crucibles tend to be more friable because the pores act as
stress concentration centers (Rice 1987:361). This is not a concern for the pit smelting
setup. By placing the crucible within a shallow pit, the walls of the pit provide structural
support for the crucible during firing. The crushed charcoal piled in the crucible would
create a reducing environment for the conversion of ore to copper metal, and the
is strong evidence for smelting activity rather than just re-melting metal objects, though
melting and recycling occurred as well. The charge for these crucibles, that is, the ore or
metal with which they were filled, can be inferred from the composition of the slag and
Period VI:1; A-1123ss521, A2-1184ss63, and A1-1109ss511 from Period IV) produced
high purity copper, but the presence of sulfide inclusions suggests that the material
smelted included some polymetallic ore mixed with oxide and/or carbonate ore. Copper
sulfide ores must be roasted to oxidize the sulfur before smelting in a reducing
atmosphere (Eq. 4.1). The resulting compound is usually a copper oxide or copper
carbonate, depending on the initial ore composition and the roasting conditions. This
copper oxide can be smelted in a reducing atmosphere (Eq. 4.2). It is also possible to
combine ore types to retrieve copper metal in a single stage smelting operation (Eq.
4.3a,b), but this requires a specific ratio of ores and a specific smelting atmosphere. If
these conditions are not met, one can easily end up with a small amount of sulfur
associated with the copper (Eq. 4.4), resulting in non-metallic inclusions (Zwicker and
Goudarloo 1979:361), similar to those seen in the Godin prills and artifacts.
The later Godin crucible (AA2-193ss9) contains Sn-rich prills up to 11wt%. This
melting crucible was used for either recycling Sn bronze implements or mixing copper
with pure tin from ingots. Tin was traded in both forms (bronze and tin ingots) in
120
antiquity (Hauptman et al. 2002, Budd et al. 1995), so it would have been possible to
The prills in B1-510ss28 (Period VI:1) and A1-1123ss521 (Period IV) contain a
copper-rich phase and a two-phase eutectic of copper plus cuprite (Cu2O) as shown in
Figure 4.4. The phase diagram for Cu-O (Figure 4.5) shows that cuprite forms in the
two-phase region just below the eutectic temperature at the copper-rich end of the
diagram. The formation of cuprite indicates that a fully reducing atmosphere was not
achieved for these crucibles as seen by the Cu-O stability diagram in Figure 4.6. It is
probable that the partial pressure of O2 was sufficient for smelting the ore at higher
temperatures (T = 1300oC and PO2 < 10-6 barr), but during cooling, the partial pressure
remained constant allowing the formation of Cu2O. The presence of ore fragments with
crucible A1-1123ss521 suggests that it was used for smelting ore, and therefore a
sufficiently reducing atmosphere must have been achieved, even if only at higher
temperatures.
121
(a) A1-1123ss521
(b) B1-510ss28
Figure 4.4: Metallographic sections of (a) A1-1123ss521, Period IV, and (b) B1-510ss28, Period
VI:1, Crucibles, unetched. Showing copper cuprite eutectic.
122
Figure 4.5: Copper rich end of the Cu-O phase diagram (Neumann et al. 1990)
Figure 4.6: Cu-O stability diagram with pressure in bar (Neumann et al. 1990).
123
Crucible fragment A1-1109ss511 from Period IV is particularly revealing of the
processing because of the high As and Sb content in the prills of the crucible slag (see
Table 3.5). Only one of the prills within this slag contains both dendrites plus
interdendritic eutectic (Figure 4.7), but this does not warrant concern since heterogeneity
from one prill to the next in the same crucible is common with smelting (Tylecote et al.
1977:311). In addition, the prill with plus eutectic is the largest prill and may have
experienced slightly different cooling kinetics than the others, allowing time for this
eutectic composition to be reached. The primary phase in this prill is Cu-4.8wt%As, but
the eutectic constituents are too fine to be resolved by electron microprobe; the averaged
Figure 4.8: Cu-As equilibrium phase diagram (Subramanian and Laughlin 1990).
consistent with the Cu-As phase diagram (Figure 4.8) and represents a mixture of the
This alloy composition can result from smelting copper ores containing over
10wt%As at temperatures over 900oC, as shown in Figure 4.9 (Pollard et al. 1991).
Arsenic-bearing ores, such as tetrahedrite, occur at the Shamsabad deposit about 125 km
south east of Godin Tepe (deposit 71 in Figure 4.2). The chemical formula for the
mineral tetrahedrite is Cu12[S(SbS3)4], but arsenic will often substitute for antimony
(Bernard and Hyrsl 2004:599). If all antimony were replaced with arsenic the formula
arsenopyrite as well, which also could have contributed to the high arsenic content of the
Figure 4.9: Retained arsenic during smelting operations at various temperatures, the initial arsenic
content of the ore is indicated for each line (Pollard et al. 1991).
metallic prills have been plotted on their respective equilibrium phase diagrams
(Appendix C, p.210) to determine the minimum temperature necessary to reach the liquid
phase (Table 4.1). The highest melting temperature (Tm) for the entrapped prills is
1115oC for A1-1123ss521, a smelting crucible from Period IV. However, this does not
126
necessarily reflect the maximum temperature reached during processing; rather, it is the
In addition, the discrete phases within the slag layer on the crucibles have been
composition. It is generally assumed that FeO and CaO will act as fluxes in a silicate
slag, thereby lowering the melting temperature (Kongoli 2003:203; Tylecote 1992).
However, as shown in Figure 4.10, the effect of CaO content on the slag Tm depends on
127
the other constituents of the slag as well as the ratio of iron to silica (Kongoli 2003).
Most of the phases present in the Godin Tepe slags fall in the silica-saturated region or in
the wollastonite region (Table 4.2). The Tm values reported in Table 4.2 are based on the
glass phase composition for each slag. They were estimated from Kongolis (2003)
(a)
(b)
Figure 4.10: (a) Liquid regions of FeO-Fe2O3-SiO2-CaO-Al2O3 slag at 1250oC and PO2 of 10-8 atm, for
various Al2O3 contents; and (b) Liquidus surface of FeO-Fe2O3-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO slag at 7% MgO, 2%
Al2O3 and PO2 of 10-8 atm (Kongoli 2003:205).
phase diagrams (Figure 4.10) as well as those presented in Muan and Osborn (1965) and
Jahanshahi and Sun (2003). These diagrams represent the liquidus behavior of iron-rich
128
calcium-alumino-silicate slags in slightly more reducing atmospheres than were likely for
the Godin Tepe slags. These slag phase diagrams correspond to compositions that are
slightly lower in Al2O3 and higher in Fe than is typical of the Godin Tepe material, and
therefore the melting temperatures derived from these diagrams is taken as a rough
estimate of Tm. At any rate, all estimated values fell between 1200 and 1300oC,
suggesting that the metallurgical industry at Godin Tepe was a high temperature one.
Further study is required to more precisely determine the thermal history of these vessels,
and this could be done using thin section analysis for identification of the phases, DTA
for direct Tm measurement, and hot stage microscopy and remelting experiments to
determine slumping temperatures as performed for the Tal-i Iblis crucible material
(Frame 2004).
Period III finds included a melting crucible, two molds, and a right-angle tuyere.
The tuyere (A1-40) is of particular interest due to its unique nature on the Iranian plateau.
129
The only other tuyeres from the Bronze Age of highland Iran have been found further
north in Azerbaijan at Kyul Tepe and Yanik Tepe (Kushnareva 1997:198). However,
these northern tuyeres are both straight and narrow (Figure 4.11), unlike Godins curved,
(a) (b)
Figure 4.11: Straight tuyeres from (a) Yanik Tepe and (b) Kyul Tepe; scale in cm (Kushnareva
1997:198)
The tuyere fabric is similar to that of the crucible and furnace fragments in composition
and porosity. The interior is reduced with a thin layer of slag and multiple prills near one
rim. Because the external surface is free of slag droplets and contains no evidence of
splashed metal or slag during processing (typical of the upper side of tuyeres), it has
been assumed that this fragment is from the underside of the tuyere. The bellows rim is
reinforced and flattened compared to the working-rim (the rim in contact with the
furnace or crucible with which this tuyere was used), and it has an inner diameter of
approximately 3cm. The working-rim has a slightly larger inner diameter of 4cm. The
130
(a)
(b)
Figure 4.12: Tuyere from Godin Tepe (A1-40) showing (a) interior and (b) exterior.
tuyere could have been used with either a furnace or crucible, but to date, there is no
evidence for furnaces during Period III at Godin Tepe. If used with a crucible, it is likely
that the crucible contained a dip in the rim to accommodate the shape of the tuyere. The
prills near the working rim could have accumulated from the reduction of ore fragments
stuck to the tuyere or from the tuyere being positioned near the level of slag or molten
metal, i.e., the tuyere was not positioned above the fuel source pointing down. In
addition, the compositions of the prills (Table 3.5) reveal drastically different alloys.
Two prills are Cu-4wt%Fe alloys, and the other, though heavily corroded, has a very high
131
Sn content (30wt%), which may be inflated due to preferential corrosion of copper. This
is strong evidence that the Godin craftsmen were either mixing Sn-bronze alloys with Cu-
Fe alloys in a single batch, or more likely, this tuyere was used more than once during
The two molds from Godin Tepe are from Period III and are similar in both fabric
and internal shape (Gd69-218, Period III:1 and Gd71-120, Period III:6, Figure 4.13).
(a)
5cm
1cm
(b)
Figure 4.13: Molds from Godin Tepe (a) Gd69-218, Period III:1, and (b) Gd71-120, Period III:6
shown at the same scale.
132
These were used for casting metal strips (blanks, wedges, or elongated preforms), and are
similar in form to molds from Geoy Tepe and Kyul Tepe shown in Figure 4.14
(Kushnareva 1997:198). These Godin Tepe casting molds were not available for
sampling, but the interior surfaces are heavily vitrified and the fabric is a grit-tempered
ceramic to improve both thermal properties and durability of the mold. In addition, these
two similar-looking open-molds were from Period III:6 (Gd71-120) and Period III:1
Period III. As seen from the Godin Tepe metal finds (e.g., Gd67-104) closed molds were
also used during this time, though there is no evidence for casting any other forms at
Godin.
(a)
(b)
Figure 4.14: Molds from (a) Kyul Tepe, and (b) Geoy Tepe; scale in cm (Kushnareva 1997:198).
Due to the small number of crucible and slag samples from each period and the
of production at Godin Tepe represented by these crucibles is much too small to account
for all, or even many, of the objects found at the site. Rather, if we assume some
uniformity in the preservation rate of finished artifacts and manufacturing debris, then the
majority of the metal finds excavated at Godin Tepe must have been traded from other
sites along the High Road, north-south roads, or from nearby towns. Therefore, the
Godin artifacts may reveal a much broader view of metallurgical activity for the region in
which Godin Tepe interacted. The analysis of seventy out of over two hundred well-
dated metal artifacts allows interpretation of the variability and temporal trends in
Although the earliest metal artifacts were manufactured from native copper or
easily smelted carbonate ore (Tylecote 1992:2), as the technology progressed, alloys
became more complex and eventually compositions were specifically selected to suit the
intended function of the implements being formed. Specifically, the occurrence of higher
Cu-As alloy compositions (over 2wt%As) at Godin Tepe suggests deliberate choice
during the manufacturing process to select for specific material properties. More
generally, alloys of As and Sn were chosen to lower the melting temperature and improve
the hardness of the metal. Arsenical copper appears in the archaeological record at Godin
Tepe before tin, and this is due to multiple factors, the most obvious of which is the
limited availability of tin. However, even when tin became more widely available, the
134
shift from Cu-As alloys to Cu-Sn alloys with higher than trace amounts of Sn
(0.1wt%Sn) was gradual and occurred more rapidly for decorative artifact types. In
addition, artifacts from Periods III:2 to Period II show mixtures of As and Sn.
Though exact values are not reported, the addition of As or Sn to pure copper
substantially increases the hardness of the metal (Figure 4.14) even at contents as low as
Unfortunately for the craftsmen, arsenic is both toxic and highly volatile, especially
during hot-working (Tylecote 1992:10), remelting, and casting (Fleming et al. 2005:40),
which means that the physical properties of the metal will change during processing as
the solute concentration decreases. However, toxicity is an argument for limiting the
processing time during hot working. In addition, although As additions above 1wt%, and
especially above 3wt% improve the hardness of copper, there is very little solid-solution
strengthening that takes place (Budd and Ottaway 1991:138). In the case of As and Sn
solute atoms, subsitutional solid-solutions are formed with copper, and typically greater
atomic radius of 140.5 pm should provide better strengthening than As with an atomic
radius of 124.5 pm when in solution with copper (127.8 pm). However, size is not the
only factor that determines a solutes ability to strengthen. The elastic behavior of the
solute and solvent also play a role in the ability of the solute to strengthen the alloy, and
135
ultimately, the mechanical properties of the metal depend largely on the microstructure
properties of copper through solid solution strengthening is one of the main benefits of
this alloy element, and it is preferred when physical properties such as hardness (knife
The earliest artifacts are Cu-As alloys, with As below 5wt%. Most of these alloys
fall within the range of optimal arsenic composition, but does this reflect availability of
materials and technological practice, or a real technological choice for better alloy
specifically mixed varying amounts of native or precast metals to achieve a prescribed set
problem into two parts, ore selection and post-smelting metal selection, this issue of
technical choice can be addressed. It is concluded here that the artifacts do reflect (to an
extent) intentional selection of both ore and metal composition based on properties.
By considering whether these alloy compositions are likely to have come from
smelting a single ore, or mixing ores and/or metals, one can begin to understand the
intentionality of ore selection. Tylecote (1992:10) has shown that arsenic contents less
retained if smelting occurs at temperatures over 900oC and if the ore charge contains at
least 20% As, at 800oC (Pollard et al. 1991:171). There are many copper-arsenic-
containing ores that include this much arsenic or more. For example, lavendulan
and koutikite (Cu5As2), containing up to 32% As, are all found at the Talmessi deposit
500 km west-southwest from Godin Tepe (Bernard and Hyrsl 2004). This particular
deposit is known to have been heavily exploited during the Bronze Age and lies in the
Anarak district (Pigott 1999:78). With the co-occurrence of copper and arsenic, this is
also a likely source for the metal artifacts at Godin Tepe. This is not to suggest that the
Godin craftsmen were obtaining ore directly from Telmessi, which lies hundreds of km
away. It is much more likely that, since the majority of these artifacts were brought to
Godin through trade, they were produced at one of the larger production centers closer to
Further, ores from the Telmessi deposit are high in Ni and Co (Pigott 1999:79).
This matches the high amount of Ni (commonly over 0.5wt%) observed for many of the
Period III metal artifacts. Despite the amount of nickel in the ore charge, Ni will only
appear in the metal product when smelted at temperatures over 1000oC (Pollard et al.
rich inclusions provided that the metal is not remelted to remove sulfides and other
intermetallics. Ni is absent in most of the earlier artifacts, and this may indicated two
possibilities. Either the appearance of Ni in some alloys reflects the use of a higher
temperature smelting practice at the major production sites of Iran, or its appearance
137
reflects a shift in ore source to a Ni-rich deposit such as Telmessi. It has already been
shown that Godin Tepe displays a high-temperature processing industry, and while this
does not prove that all producers during the Bronze Age were attaining such temperatures
during smelting, it is reasonably likely that most were reaching close to at least 1000oC.
Therefore the presence of Ni in some, but not all, metal artifacts at Godin Tepe, indicates
that these artifacts were probably coming from many production sites, some of which
Additional support for the smelting of a single Cu-As ore type stems from the
presence of silver-rich regions within the corrosion products of many artifacts, reported
for over twenty samples in many of the Chapter 3 Tables as Metal in corroded region
deposits on the Iranian Plateau (Bazin and Hubner 1969), contributes Ag to the resulting
alloy. Further, because there is such low solubility of Ag in Cu as it cools and especially
at low temperatures (Figure 4.15), the silver remains in solution in the smelted metal, but
over time (e.g., archaeological timescales) Ag migrates to grain boundaries and regions
Figure 4.15: Cu-Ag equilibrium phase diagram (Massalski and Okamoto 1990;
Murray 1984).
If Ag-rich regions were near or at the surface, a galvanic corrosion process would
occur during burial and preferentially attack the copper leaving behind silver globules in
the corrosion product. The large difference in the standard reduction potentials of copper
and silver make this galvanic corrosion is possible (Table 4.3). The presence of silver in
the corrosion products may therefore indicate the use of one of the many Cu-As-Ag ores
as charge during smelting. Some minerals also contain Ag and As without any copper,
but most of these are rare and do not occur in substantial quantities on the Iranian
Plateau, nor would they have been selected for smelting when the desired metal was a
copper-base alloy.
139
central Iran correlates with the resulting composition and microstructure of many metal
artifacts from Godin Tepe summarized in Table 4.4. Of particular interest are the
samples that contain low amounts of Ni in the bulk metal phase but do contain Ni-rich
sulfides. From these data, it is concluded that the majority of the artifacts analyzed from
Godin Tepe reflect intentional selection of Cu-As ores, despite the more abundant non-
Table 4.4: Composition of Ni- and Ag-bearing artifacts (bdl=below detection limit)
Godin No. Period Object Notes Cu As Sn Ag Ni Total
Gd73-379 VI Chisel Metal in corroded region 10.38 bdl bdl 88.99 0.11 99.51
Gd73-312 VI Object Metal 97.40 1.92 bdl bdl 0.83 100.38
bright inclusions 80.48 12.66 bdl 0.28 1.56 102.08
dark inclusion (in EM view) 81.62 8.89 bdl 0.11 0.68 97.18
B2-351ssX25 IV Nugget Metal 3.49 bdl bdl bdl 8.86 74.09
Metal (phase2) 18.24 1.03 bdl 63.72 0.22 85.61
A1-1123ss521 IV Crucible fragment #2 Prill #1 85.33 bdl bdl bdl bdl 87.11
Metal in corroded region 2.40 bdl bdl 90.24 bdl 92.64
A1-1109ss511 IV Crucible fragments Prill #1 89.33 6.85 bdl bdl 1.44 99.49
Prill #1 - Bright Inclusion 50.36 15.50 bdl 0.90 6.37 99.86
Prill #2 91.14 6.00 bdl 0.07 1.57 99.18
Prill #3 - Primary phase 93.62 4.82 bdl 0.07 0.66 99.30
Prill #3 Secondary phase 70.17 26.65 bdl bdl 0.11 99.13
Prill #3 - Bright Inclusion 34.55 9.01 bdl 17.47 5.70 106.57
Gd65-33 III Chisel Metal 96.56 2.09 0.67 0.22 0.14 100.11
Dark Inclusions 92.17 1.70 0.09 0.18 0.12 98.81
Metal in corroded region 11.14 bdl 0.14 77.08 bdl 88.52
Metal in corroded region 21.55 7.85 0.25 27.57 bdl 96.59
Gd71-153 III (?) Needle Metal 97.18 2.27 bdl 0.07 0.10 99.67
Bright Inclusion 37.65 7.42 0.23 bdl 0.23 96.32
Dark Inclusion 51.54 1.65 0.57 bdl 2.85 84.08
Gd71-19 III:6 Chisel Metal 97.76 2.10 0.05 0.10 0.05 101.04
Metal in corroded region 66.84 1.38 0.05 26.71 0.05 95.53
Gd71-49 III:6 Wire Metal 98.45 1.36 bdl 0.18 0.03 100.02
Metal in corroded region 45.67 0.69 bdl 28.07 bdl 74.49
Gd73-103 III:6 Pin Metal 96.30 2.96 bdl 0.08 bdl 100.33
Metal in corroded region 42.04 0.78 0.30 50.97 bdl 94.63
140
141
The next part of this issue of intentionality is to determine whether specific alloy
compositions were selected after smelting copper and arsenic ores. Budd and Ottaway
(1991) and Lechtman (1996) show that less than 2wt%As does not significantly improve
the hardness of Cu, increasing the hardness from VHNCu=50 to only VHNCu-2wt%As=53
(1996:488), and over 6 to 8wt%As diminishes the ductility to the point of making cold
working quite difficult (1996:481). Therefore, the optimal range of arsenic to achieve
This optimal range is achieved for many of the Godin Tepe metals as shown in a
tabulation of the compositions of the objects (Figure 4.16). Also, the small number of
decorative objects, such as bracelets, that fall within the optimal range of 2 6wt%As
suggests that this optimal As content was specifically chosen for artifacts that would
require these improved mechanical properties. Most of the Period III objects in the 2
6wt%As range are chisels, undecorated pins, and needles. The absence of optimal
Presenc
Presence ofofAsAsininGodin
Godin metal
Metalartifacts
Artifacts
100%
80%
>6wt%
60%
2-6wt%As
40%
<2wt%As
20%
0%
VI IV III:6 III:5 III:4 III:3 III:2 Post II
III:2
Period
Figure 4.16: The presence of optimum composition arsenic in Godin Tepe metal artifacts.
144
composition As-bearing artifacts during Period III:2 or later is a result of the introduction
of tin as a common alloying element at this time. The only utilitarian artifacts that
contained no Sn during the later Periods were the projectiles (arrowheads and spearheads)
that require high overall toughness, not hardness (though the edges would require cold-
working to allow the point to slice through its target). These data indicate that aside from
the earliest period, Cu-As alloys were usually produced in the composition range with
optimal hardness for the metal indicating that a patterned activity was practiced by
craftsmen who knew what they were doing. They were willing to work with a more toxic
The addition of tin to copper was another technical choice made by these ancient
craftsmen. For metal production in Iran, where it was previously assumed that there are
few tin deposits associated with the copper deposits (Bazin and Hubner 1969), and where
the earlier metals contain only trace amounts of tin (<0.09wt%), it is tempting to call any
tin above 1wt% deliberate. However, this is unreasonable given the recent evidence for
ancient mining activity at a Cu-Sn deposit in Luristan (Deh Hosein), and the large
amount of recycling of bronze objects that was possible well before large amounts of tin
were available at great distances from the major sources. Also, though the Deh Hosein
deposit is small, it would have been sufficient to contribute low amounts of tin to copper
alloys (Nezafati et al. 2007). It should be noted that such co-occurrences of copper and
tin ore are also present in southwestern Afghanistan (though not in Anatolia), and these
145
could yield 2wt%Sn bronzes (Stech 1999:62). Artifacts produced in these regions may
have been of noticeably harder metal. However, after recycling these low-Sn containing
artifacts, the result was probably low-Sn metal implements exhibiting no benefit in
mechanism for recognizing higher quality alloys and the recipes for optimal tin content
were not yet established. Regardless, our identification of intentional Cu-Sn alloys
should be based on the presence of Sn at quantities that cause noticeable changes in the
metal. These differences in the metal could include color change (for high tin content), a
change in the sound of the metal (Hosler 1994), or a change in the mechanical properties
of the metal during processing and subsequent use. It has been argued that such changes
occur at tin contents as low as 2wt% (Stech 1999:62), but the evidence for this is sparse,
so the more widely accepted value of 5wt%Sn will be taken as the threshold for
noticeable changes in the physical properties of the metal (Moorey 1969:134, Lechtman
1996). For this reason, artifacts with tin contents of 5wt% or greater will be considered
deliberate alloys.
Most of the Period III:2 and Period II Sn-bearing artifacts from Godin Tepe
The earlier artifacts often contain both As and Sn in lower quantities, and it is argued
here that this also reflects intentional alloy production, but of a more transitional
character. The Godin Tepe metal artifacts reflect a transition from unintentional Cu-Sn
the appearance of tin in copper was deliberate (a view summarized, but not held by
Lechtman 1996:478).
Tin was hard to come by in southwest Asia; production centers, such as that at
Goltepe, Turkey (Yener and Vandiver 1993) and others in Afghanistan may have
provided tin ingots for most of western Asia. These were melted and mixed with copper
1977). It has been argued that additions of 5wt%Sn or less would not greatly alter the
physical properties of the metal (Eaton and McKerrel 1976), nor yield a visible color
change. Why, then, are there so many artifacts containing low levels of Sn? One
possibility for this trend is that recycling high Sn-bronze artifacts with other reasonably
concentration while introducing As to the alloy. Many of the Godin Tepe low-Sn-
content and the other elements or with the compositions of the inclusions, thus making it
These Cu-As-Sn alloy objects may actually perform just as well as others with
higher contents of Sn and As, but because these are not industrially-relevant alloy
compositions, little research has been done to determine their mechanical properties
(Lechtman 1996). The relationship between tin content and artifact type by period is
shown in Figure 4.17. Although many of the artifacts with lower than 5wt%Sn are
147
bracelets and pins, there are also chisels with low Sn. These utilitarian objects are the
artifacts that also contain low amounts of As, but further study is required to prove that
16.00
14.00
12.00 Chisel
10.00 Blades
wt%Sn
8.00 Pins
6.00 Bracelets
4.00 Nuggets
2.00
0.00
III:6
III:5
III:4
III:3
III:2
Post III:2
II
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00
Period
The reason for many bracelets and pins with low tin content may also be rooted in
social rather than technological choices. Tin was valued for its rarity and the effort
necessary to obtain it from far away (Stech and Pigott 1986:48). Stech and Pigott argue
that because the mechanical advantages of using tin bronze are not easily distinguishable
from those of arsenical copper, the value would be rooted in the status (not the function)
of the objects, and the presence of tin was conveyed verbally. This may mean that by
adding some tin to an object, even though it is not enough tin to impart changes to the
physical properties of the metal, it now has a greater status and the word of the
craftsman is all that is needed to show that it really contains tin. It is difficult to believe
that these verbal assertions would travel over great distances with the artifacts, but even
148
today we see consumers who trust a label or brand in absence of noticeable property
differences in commodities. It would be interesting to consider how long tin may have
been revered primarily for its status as an exotic and rare commodity rather than an
unintentional or the alloy resulted from inadequate choice of objects for recycling, that is,
choosing Cu-As rather than Cu-Sn metals, and I believe this is true for the earlier
appearances of tin. However, the composition of Godin Tepe metal artifacts conveys a
clear trend towards increased tin and arsenic content and overall complexity in
well as the exploitation of more complex poly-metallic ore sources, and increased
recycling of artifacts as seen in the dirty alloys found outside of burial contexts.
they must be examined by functional object type through time. The method of
the microstructure revealed a large range of processing methods, especially for the early
objects. However, upon closer examination, it became clear that artifacts within
particular functional groups were produced in remarkably similar ways. The best
All of the chisels (Figures 3.11, 3.12, 3.15, and 3.28) have been heavily worked to
the point of containing fine grains with annealing twins and slip lines and having a well-
defined lamellar structure, emphasized by the segregation of solute content, which etches
darker with ferric chloride. In addition, the elongation of non-metallic inclusions shows
an aspect ratio of as much as 25:1. On average, the chisels show 25 65% reduction in
The arrowheads and spearheads were also produced for specific performance
criteria in mind. The high aspect ratio of the inclusions indicates heavy working to
achieve the desired shape (Figures 3.30 and 3.36). The arrow/spearheads were then fully
annealed at high temperatures (>600oC) for multiple hours (>2hrs) to promote grain
growth yielding large equiaxed grains, free of defects (Budd 1991:117). These large
grains would provide maximum toughness for the projectiles. Additionally, the
composition for these artifacts (usually pure copper) suggests a further desire to minimize
hardness since Cu-As and Cu-Sn alloys would increase tensile strength but decrease
overall toughness. This high toughness is desired in arrowheads because it would allow
them to absorb and disperse some of the energy of the impact. If they were fine-grained
with many defects, they would be extremely brittle and may fracture after only a few
uses. The energy absorption of the large-grained microstructure would not prevent them
from slicing through their target, provided the edges and tip were cold-hammered.
Further, the long annealing time required to allow recrystallization and grain growth
artifacts from Burial 2 in square AA2 (Gd67-450, 452, and 455) are all similar in
150
Gd67-452) have heavily worked microstructures necessary for cutting tools, and the third
(Gd67-455) has heavily annealed grains, typical of projectile points. Therefore, despite
the similar typology of these weapons, the true intentions of their use appear to be quite
different.
The blades and daggers include both functional and decorative samples. The
earliest blade (Gd71-261) is cast, and only slightly worked suggesting that it is largely
decorative. Of the three later blades and daggers (Gd67-202, AA2-176ss5, and Gd67-
237) only Gd67-237 contained enough metal to discern the microstructure. This blade
showed signs of working by the slightly elongated grains and annealing twins, but in
general the grains were large and equiaxed. Similarly, the armor-plate (Gd67-196)
contained large grains, beneficial to its function as a means to absorb the shock of
oncoming projectiles. Overall, these artifacts reflect manufacturing methods that were
This is not the case for decorative artifacts from Godin Tepe. Unlike the
utilitarian weapons and tools, there is a high degree of variability among the decorative
artifacts such as pins, needles, and bracelets. The pins and needles include both
functional and decorative samples. Most of the pins and needles from the earlier periods
are straight and undecorated, but although they were manufactured with the same purpose
employed. Their microstructures show that they have been processed to provide hardness
(fine-grained microstructure or large grains with multiple slip lines to minimize defect
151
movement and deformation) without creating an overly brittle tool. The later pins
contain surface decoration such as ridges (Gd67-126, Period III:6 and Gd71-344, Period
II), holes (Gd67-219 and Gd67-215, both Period III:2) and flattened ends (Gd67-113,
Period III:6 and Gd67-207, Period III:2). These are often produced in very different
are also varied for these objects, but Gd67-219 and Gd67-215 are worthy of note in that
they are similar in typology and microstructure and found in the same burial. The main
difference between them is that one is high tin (9wt%) and the other is lower tin (5wt%),
which would cause a color difference between these two highly decorative elite items.
voids present at the centers of some bracelets rapid cooling during casting indicating that
they were cast in closed molds where metal solidified at the edges first; this is best seen
with Gd67-104 (Figure 3.21a). Some of these items have been only minimally worked
after casting (as seen from the slightly deformed dendrites in Figure 3.21). Others have
been annealed and worked to the point of showing annealing twins. Often, the edges in
cross-sectional view show signs of additional working (slip lines); this may be from
forming the bracelet or obtaining the desired surface finish (Gd67-231, Figure 3.33). It is
likely that they were cast and then worked enough to achieve the desired shape and
surface finish. That some have a preserved cast structure while others do not, may be
related more closely to the composition as well as the processing. The discrepancy
between the atomic size of Cu and Sn is larger than between Cu and As, which allows for
a higher diffusivity of As in copper than Sn; this enables easier redistribution of the As in
152
solution during annealing episodes, though complete redistribution of the As solute still
requires many hours of annealing at 600oC or higher (Budd 1991:117). The preserved
cast structures appear more frequently in objects with higher tin and arsenic content
manufacture them in a particular way or with a particular composition for them to fulfill
bronze. This higher tin content was not necessary for increased hardness as seen with
chisels and blades. Instead, the high tin content would create a more golden-looking
metal and give it a more resonant sound, thus reinforcing the idea that tin was just as
much a social-status commodity as it was a utilitarian one. The high degree of variability
craftsmen, workshops, and towns may have had their own methods of producing similar
looking bracelets by employing widely different techniques. For example, Gd67-103 and
Gd67-104 are similar in typology with overlapping ends (Appendix B), but the former is
heavily annealed (Figure 3.20a), while the latter is cast (Figure 3.21). The variety of
bracelet microstructures most likely represents separate workshop facilities (or at least
separate craftsmen) who are copying style from regional fashions but are not copying
Other items, such as the nuggets and the probable figurine or standard fragment
from Period VI:1 (Gd73-312), are generally as-cast. The nuggets are probably scraps
153
from processing or spare pieces of metal, but it is difficult to determine this without more
contextual evidence. As noted above, the early cast object (Gd73-312) may be part of a
square adjacent to Gd73-312, both at the Godin VI:1 level. However, Gd73-102 remains
in the Iranian collection in the National Museum in Tehran. These two are similar in
samples can be studied to estimate the cooling rate during casting events. The method
presented below was also applied to one crucible prill that had a preserved cast structure
(Figure 4.7). The compositions for the ten samples are summarized in Table 4.5. The
cooling rate was estimated based on measurements of secondary dendrite arm spacing
(SDAS).
Table 4.5: Metal artifacts with dendritic microstructures (bdl=below detection limit)
Object # Description n Period Cu As Sn Fe Ni Ag Sb Total
Figurine
Gd73-312 10 VI 97.40 1.92 bdl 0.09 0.83 bdl 0.10 100.34
fragment
Gd71-261 Blade 16 IV 96.43 2.51 0.05 0.53 0.15 bdl 0.06 99.73
Crucible
A1-1109ss511 2 IV 93.62 4.82 bdl bdl 0.66 0.07 0.13 99.30
prill
Gd67-104 Bracelet 20 III:6 93.70 3.02 1.33 1.08 0.76 0.27 0.07 100.23
A1-69ss2 Nugget* 4 III:4 97.06 2.20 0.09 0.16 0.17 bdl 0.06 99.74
B1-38 Nugget* 10 III:4 90.97 0.93 7.63 0.12 0.15 bdl bdl 98.92
Gd67-231 Bracelet 15 III:2 93.32 1.27 5.04 0.07 0.30 0.06 0.05 100.11
Gd73-419 Pin 4 II 97.11 1.59 bdl 0.44 0.27 bdl bdl 99.41
* Probable raw material lump that was cast prior to forming.
154
Cooling rate is taken here as the average rate during solidification, that is, the total
decrease in temperature divided by the total time for solidification. This cooling rate
depends on the cooling environment and geometry of the metal object. Faster cooling
rates allow less time for ripening of dendrites and therefore result in microstructures with
finer texture and closer spacing of secondary dendrite arms (Reed-Hill and Abbaschian
1994). Using this knowledge cooling rates can be calculated based on the SDAS
following the general relationship shown graphically in Figure 4.18 and mathematically
Figure 4.18: Relationship between secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS) and cooling rate ( T )
for different alloys (after Askeland 1984:160 and Grugel 1993).
Experimental values of n vary between 0.33 and 0.5 (Miettinen 2001) and depend on the
composition of the melt. This relationship has been heavily explored for Al-Cu alloys
(Bardes and Flemings 1966; Flemings et al. 1991; Glicksman et al. 1992; Kattamis et al.
1967; Miyata et al. 1985), but these aluminum alloys typically show a different set of
SDAS cooling rate curves than Cu-base alloys. The cooling rates reported here are based
C takes into account the alloy composition, and for the alloys discussed here, C was
calculated based on Equation 4.7. Each solute element is expressed in wt% as Ci, where
(Eq. 4.7)
The SDAS was calculated from micrographs of the artifacts using Equations 4.6 and 4.7,
Table 4.6: Calculated cooling rates for Godin Tepe cast artifacts
Object # Period Description Ave SDAS (m) C (wt%) T (oC/s)
Gd73-312 VI Figurine fragment 29.72 0.76 14.05
A1-69ss2 III:4 Nugget 81.61 0.81 0.64
Gd71-261 IV Blade 81.69 0.95 0.56
Gd67-104 III:6 Bracelet 64.90 2.03 0.52
Gd67-231 III:2 Bracelet 84.76 2.72 0.17
B1-38 III:4 Nugget 82.71 3.17 0.15
Gd73-419 II Pin 145.30 0.64 0.14
A1-1109ss511 IV Crucible prill 112.59 1.67 0.12
The rates indicate that there are three methods of cooling, or casting and
annealing, which yield cooling rates of 14oC/s, ~0.55oC/s, and ~0.15oC/s, regardless of
artifact type. Table 4.7 presents examples of cooling rates for quenching in water or a
water-oil mixture as well as cooling in a furnace. It should be noted that the secondary
dendrite arm spacing is indicative of the entire cooling process given that ripening occurs
while the secondary arms are in contact with the melt (Kurz and Fisher 1984:73).
Therefore, a low cooling rate may suggest furnace cooling as well as possible annealing.
Based on the values reported in Table 4.7, most of the artifacts could be described as
furnace-cooled. This matches well with the low cooling rate estimated for the crucible
prill (A1-1109ss511) since it is likely that the crucible containing this entrapped prill
would have cooled slowly in situ after the smelting event was finished. Furnace-cooled
suggests slow and relatively controlled cooling, but this phrase should not carry the same
precision as it does in modern industrial practice. These artifacts would have been cast
into open, closed, or lost wax molds, and although relative cooling rates may be assumed
for these casting methods (i.e., a closed mold would produce a slower cooling rate than
157
an open mold), exact cooling rates for these presumed ancient practices have not yet been
determined.
4.3 Conclusions
artifacts and nine technical ceramics using traditional techniques, such as WDS-
solidification data to estimate processing temperatures and cooling rates that were
Godin Tepe metal artifacts illustrates the transitions occurring in copper production
several temporal trends. First, it moves from aesthetic (early cast object) to utilitarian
and decorative. This is a conclusion biased by the limited evidence from the earliest
levels; the chisel from Period VI:1 contained no metal for microstructural analysis, and
many of the other Period VI:1 finds remain in Iran. However, of the two figurines and
158
one standard excavated at Godin Tepe, both the standard and one of the figurines were
found in Period VI:1 contexts, and the early blade was cast with little subsequent
working. Aesthetic and decorative items made up a larger proportion of the artifact
It is interesting that the decorative items (pins and bracelets) vary widely in their
manufacture. The different microstructures of similar looking pins and bracelets suggest
that there was little communication and regulation of manufacturing practices among
what are assumed to be multiple producers of the region. The only exceptions to this are
the chisels and the arrow/spearheads, which are produced for specific purposes, requiring
and having very specific properties. For example, the chisels all have work-hardened tips
The styles of bracelets, pins, and even the daggers (Gd67-202) at Godin Tepe are
similar to a variety of artifacts across the Iranian plateau and northern Mesopotamia. For
example, the dagger (Gd67-202) is similar to one at the Bronze Age sanctuary of Tang-i
Hamamlan in Luristan (Thran 1964:158) as well as one from Haft Tepe dating to 1500-
1350 BCE (Negahban 1991:47). The spearheads (Gd67-450, 453, and 455) are similar to
those found in the Warriors Grave at Baba Jan (Period Giyan IIb, 1500-1400 BCE)
(Goff 1976). The bracelets with overlapping ends also appear at Dinkha Tepe during late
Godin III (Rubinson 1991:381), at Agrab Tepe during Godin II (Muscarella 1973:66-67)
and Susa in the 3rd millennium BCE (Carter 1980). The pins with the button-top and hole
at mid-shaft (Gd67-215 and 219) also find parallels at Baba Jan Grave 4 (Godin Period
III) and Dinka Tepe (Rubinson 1991:385). In general, there is greater similarity between
159
metal finds at Godin and other sites on the Plateau and to the West, than farther to the
East in ancient Afghanistan, India, and Pakistan (Lamberg-Karlovsky 1967), despite the
The frequent appearance of similar style objects across the Iranian Plateau,
Luristan, and Mesopotamia does not necessarily reflect the heavy traffic of metal from
one end of the High Road to the other. Rather it indicates the transfer of a style and the
likely reproduction of that style at workshops throughout the region. This would
correlate well with the differences in production methods for similar style artifacts
(especially the pins and bracelets). However, these similar style bracelets are not
necessarily diagnostic of the trade of goods or the spread of a fashionable accessory since
it is a style that also appears frequently in the Northeastern Balkan Eneolithic (Ryndina
1999:1061) and probably elsewhere. If the bracelets of the Iranian Plateau are similar in
East, then perhaps it could be argued that they represent a shared technology for bracelet
unavailable.
Another conclusion drawn from these results is that the metallurgical technology
of this region progresses from Cu-As alloys to a wider variety of copper alloys ranging
from pure copper to high tin bronze and high arsenical bronze and eventually iron. There
the presence of co-deposits of copper and tin on the Iranian Plateau in combination with
160
the presence of low-Sn, low-As alloys supports the hypothesis that this transition to tin
bronze was both less intentional and more gradual than previously assumed.
By Period II, iron implements are common at Godin Tepe, though these have not
been analyzed in this study due to their heavy corrosion and friability. There is a distinct
primarily decorative. Most of the bronze artifacts are bracelets, pins, needles, and
arrowheads, but there are no chisels, blades, or daggers of bronze during Period IIall of
these implements are now made of iron. The continued presence of bronze arrowheads
may reflect the benefit of using a material of greater ductility and therefore toughness for
projectile points. This shift to the use of iron for utilitarian items is echoed in Luristan
necessary to analyze recently excavated artifacts with known context and provenience as
well as artifacts that have been in museum storage for decades. As is the case with Godin
Tepe, the rediscovery of excavated artifacts can shed light on the technological scene
of a site as well as the region in which it is situated. The results presented in this thesis
contribute to the understanding of small scale metal production on the Iranian Plateau, as
It is hoped that, when compared to the finds in storage at the museum in Tehran as well
as the material from current excavations, these results will elucidate the technological
APPENDIX A:
Full List of Metal Artifacts Excavated from Godin Tepe
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
ROM In this
Accession No. Godin No. Period Object Material Location study
APPENDIX B:
Photographs of Artifacts with Sample Orientations Indicated
Objects are shown with cm/mm scale. Samples indicated with white lines, and sample
orientation is indicated schematically with drawing and arrows.
Period VI:1
Gd 73-312 VI:1 Object copper/bronze
1 square = 0.5cm
Period IV
Gd 73-86 IV Pin copper/bronze
(A)
175
(B)
176
Period III
Gd 65-33 III ? Chisel bronze
Chisel tip
Sample from
this end
III A2 5 Ag Wire
? B1 10 or 11 Pb Wire
Sampled this
missing portion
nted
M ou
III:4 B1 38 8 Cu Nugget
191
Sample
from here
196
XRD
201
202
Period II
(Swartzendruber 1990)
213
(Scott 1991)
214