Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TU NGUYEN 1
Table of Content
I. Introduction................................................................................................................................ 3
II. Specification ............................................................................................................................. 3
III. Data......................................................................................................................................... 3
IV. Determination of maximum load and deflection...................................................................... 6
IV.1. Shear capacity.................................................................................................................. 6
V.2. Deflection .......................................................................................................................... 8
V. Using element types ................................................................................................................ 9
VI. Assumptions of element type and disadvantages................................................................. 10
VI.1. SOLID65......................................................................................................................... 10
VI.2. BEAM23 ......................................................................................................................... 10
VII. Simplified ANSYS model ..................................................................................................... 11
VII.1. Element types................................................................................................................ 11
VII.2. Real Constants.............................................................................................................. 12
VII.3. Material properties......................................................................................................... 12
VII.4. Modelling ....................................................................................................................... 13
VII.5. Creating element ........................................................................................................... 14
VII.6. Applying boundary condition ......................................................................................... 16
VII.7 Solution (Solve current LS) ............................................................................................ 17
VII.8. Results .......................................................................................................................... 17
VIII. Discussion........................................................................................................................... 21
VIII.1 Deflection ...................................................................................................................... 21
VIII.2 Result ............................................................................................................................ 22
VIII.3 Bending moment and Shear force................................................................................. 22
VIII.4 Structural model ............................................................................................................ 22
VIII.5 Convergence ................................................................................................................. 24
IX. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 25
Reference:.................................................................................................................................. 26
Appendix A Log file without bearing plate ............................................................................... 27
Appendix B Log file with bearing plate .................................................................................... 28
Appendix C LINK8 (3D Spar) .................................................................................................. 28
TU NGUYEN 2
I. Introduction
This purpose is to investigate the critical of shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) beams is
very significant particularly when this value is used in the practical design. A value of the shear
capacity may lead to an unpredicted and at stage brittle collapse of the structural RC beams.
Therefore, this modelling of shear crack is predicted by using Finite-Element analysis in the
purpose. In this aim, ANSYS, which is finite-element software, is applied to confirm and verify
that this RC simply supported RC beam can be achieved.
II. Specification
Figure 1
Where: B: Breadth
H: Height
L: Length
III. Data
TU NGUYEN 3
- Number of bars 4
Figure 2
0.012 2
- Cross-sectional area of one bar: A = = 1.13x10-4 m2
4
0.012 4
- Moment of inertia of area of bar: I = = 1x10-9 m4
64
- Determine stress-strain curve and Youngs modulus of concrete:
In this situation, the ratio between stress and strain must be equal to Youngs module at the first
point of stress-strain curve, and then this ratio is decreased to the last data when the
compressive strength increases. As the figure below shown, the cross-area is safe-area, where
the reinforced concrete does not crack or crush.
Figure 8
A: Safe area, B: Start cracking, C: Totally collapsed
TU NGUYEN 4
cu = 'cu (2( ) ( ) 2 ) (Design stress-strains for concrete Clause 3.1.7)
0 0
cu = fcu when 0 c cu 2
Where: cu : stress, 'cu : maximum stress, : strains, 0 : maximum strain.
TU NGUYEN 5
Table of stress-strain curve of concrete
No. Strains Stress (N/mm2) Youngs
Modulus
(N/mm2)
1 0.0001 2.925 29250
2 0.0002 5.7 28500
3 0.0003 8.325 27750
4 0.0004 10.8 27000
5 0.0005 13.125 26250
6 0.0006 15.3 25500
7 0.0007 17.325 24750
8 0.0008 19.2 24000
9 0.0009 20.925 23250
10 0.001 22.5 22500
11 0.0011 23.925 21750
12 0.0012 25.2 21000
13 0.0013 26.325 20250
14 0.0014 27.3 19500
15 0.0015 28.125 18750
16 0.0016 28.8 18000
17 0.0017 29.325 17250
18 0.0018 29.7 16500
19 0.0019 29.925 15750
20 0.002 30 15000
21 0.0021 30 15000
22 0.0022 30 15000
23 0.0023 30 15000
24 0.0024 30 15000
25 0.0025 30 15000
26 0.0026 30 15000
27 0.0027 30 15000
28 0.0028 30 15000
29 0.0029 30 15000
30 0.003 30 15000
31 0.0031 30 15000
32 0.0032 30 15000
33 0.0033 30 15000
34 0.0034 30 15000
35 0.0035 30 15000
When the concrete includes rebars to prevent tension at the bottom of concrete block, the
neutral axis now located on a different place from the centroid of concrete section. The reason
for this is reinforced concrete assumes that the concrete is cracked in location of tensile strains.
Therefore, after cracking, all of the tension is carried by the reinforcement. In addition,
according to the reinforcement is good at tension and compression. The tensile capacity of
concrete redistributes. Consequently, there must be linear distribution of strains to make the
compressive and tensile forces in equilibrium state on the section.
TU NGUYEN 6
Figure 3
+ For equilibrium of the compressive and tensile forces on the section due to rectangular
parabolic stress block:
Fcc = Fst
Therefore:
1
0.459fcub x = fyAs 0.459x30x250x x = 0.87x460x452
s
12 2
The area of tension reinforcement: As = 4x r 2 = 4x = 452 mm2
4
x = 53 mm 0.617h = 0.617x400 = 250mm
Where: c is the usual partial safety factor for the strength of concrete.
is the factor allowing the different between bending strength and the cylinder
crushing strength of the concrete.
s is the usual partial safety factor for the strength of steel.
Figure 4
TU NGUYEN 7
PL 3 68500
Maximum moment: M = = 68500 Nm P = = 37400N [1]
3 5.5
Therefore, maximum concentrated load making the RC crack is 37400N
V.2. Deflection
To determine deflection of reinforced concrete, the section assumes that this loading is long-
term duration and reinforcement and concrete work together. Then calculation of deflection
needs to be determined the curvature of section. (Bill Mosley and John Bungey and Ray Hulse,
2007, p136). Therefore, the deflection is affected by the type and size of reinforcement and
stiffness of concrete is also assumed that it has small effects (Ec,eff) to make reinforcement and
concrete co-operate.
Calculating the curvature of the cracked section the moment of inertia value of the transformed
concrete section must be recalculated. Taking area moments about the neutral axis
x
b x = ae As (d x)
2
(Bill Mosley and John Bungey and Ray Hulse, 2007, p136~138)
Where: ae is the modular ratio equal to the ratio of the elastic modulus of the reinforcement to
that of the concrete.
ES 200
ae = = = 6.82
EC , eff 29.3
Where: effective modulus: Ec,eff = 29.3/(1+0) = 29.3 kN/mm2
(Assume that creep ignored therefore (, t 0 ) = 0, Ec,eff = Ecm/(1+ (, t 0 ) )
x2
Therefore: 250x = 6.82x452(350-x) Because of 50mm cover, d = h-50 = 350
2
Neutral axis: x = 81.4 mm (Due to the reinforced concrete beam is cracked in serviceability limit
state). This neutral axis can compare with neutral axis of uncracked section in serviceability limit
state calculated below:
TU NGUYEN 8
h 400
bh + ae As d 250 400 + 6.82 452 350
xSLS = 2 = 2 = 204mm
bh + ae As 250 400 + 6.82 452
In comparison of neutral axis, the neutral axis of cracked section moved up to the top surface of
reinforced concrete. Concrete does not co-operate now with the reinforcement, when the
cracked concrete occurs at the bottom. The area of concrete will be now smaller than before in
period of crack and crush occurring. Therefore, neutral axis is move to compressive region of
reinforced concrete. This reinforcement will displace, the deflection is now calculated due to
curvature of cracked section.
x3
Moment of inertia: ICr = b + ae As (d x) 2
3
82 3
= 250 + 6.82 452(350 82) 2 = 2.9x109 mm4
3
Calculate the curvature of the cracked section:
1 M 68.5 10 6
= = = 8.06x10-6 (mm)x
r EC ,eff I Cr 29.3 10 3 2.9 10 9
Calculate deflection of serviceability limit state due to cracked section:
2
Where: f1 = (0.125 ) is deflection coefficient for various loading and restraint condition.
6
(Concrete Building Design, Table D2.4 Deflection coefficient f1 various loading and restraint condition)
In addition, SOLID65 element has a special cracking and crushing capabilities. However, the
most important aspect of this element is the treatment of nonlinear material properties. The
concrete is capable of cracking in three orthogonal directions, crushing, plastic deformation, and
TU NGUYEN 9
creep. The rebars are capable of tension and compression, but not shear. They are also
capable of plastic deformation and creep.
VI.1. SOLID65
- Volume elements are not allowed to be equal to zero.
- Elements may be numbered planes (ANSYS help Solid65). Also, the element may not be
warped such that the element has two separate volumes. This occurs most frequently when the
elements are not numbered properly.
- All elements must have eight nodes.
- A tetrahedron shape is also available.
- The extra shapes are automatically deleted for tetrahedron elements.
- The rebar capability of the element is used, the rebars are assumed to be smeared throughout
the element. The sum of the volume ratios for all rebars must not be greater than 1.0.
- The element is nonlinear and requires a repeating solution. When both cracking and crushing
are used together, concern must be taken to apply the load slowly to prevent possible
pretended crushing of the concrete before proper load transfer can occur through a closed
crack. This usually happens when excessive cracking strains are coupled to the orthogonal
uncracked directions through Poisson's effect. Also, at those integration points where crushing
has occurred, the output plastic and creep strains are from the previous converged sub-step.
Furthermore, when cracking has occurred, the elastic strain output includes the cracking strain.
The lost shear resistance of cracked and/or crushed elements cannot be transferred to the
rebars, which have no shear stiffness.
There are some disadvantages following the options above are presented in case of cracking or
crushing nonlinearities:
- Stress-stiffening effects.
- Large strain and large deflection. The results may be incorrect, especially if significantly large
rotation is involved.
VI.2. BEAM23
- The beam element must lie in an X-Y plane and must not have a zero length or area.
TU NGUYEN 10
- The height is used in calculating the bending and thermal stresses and for locating the
integration points.
- For the rectangular section, the input area, moment of inertia, and height should be consistent
with each other.
- The effect of implied offsets on the mass matrix is ignored.
- ANSYS 10 or 11 ED (Education version or Academic version) will be used for modelling the
structure. A disadvantage of this software is the limitation of nodes (10000 nodes) and the
maximum amount of elements (1000 elements). Therefore, the reinforced concrete is restricted
to model in the range of element given. The results may be acceptable in this situation.
Figure 5
- The model assumes that there is no cover at the head of beam, it means the length of
reinforcement is same the length of the beam (L= 5.5m).
- The beam will be modelled with one-half of the beam.
Figure 6
Similarly to choose: BEAM -> PLASTIC 23 (BEAM23)
In the OPTION of BEAM23, choose ROUND SOLID BAR at Cross-section K6
TU NGUYEN 11
VII.2. Real Constants
- Structural -> Nonlinear -> Inelastic -> Rate Independent -> Isotropic Hardening Plasticity ->
Mises Plasticity -> Multilinear: Please see table of stress-strain curve of concrete (Previous
calculation)
- Structural -> Nonlinear -> Inelastic -> Non-linear Metal Plasticity -> Concrete
o Shear transfer coefficients for an open crack (ShrCf-Op): 1
o Shear transfer coefficients for a closed crack (ShrCf-Cl): 1
o Uniaxial tensile cracking stress (UnTensSf): 1E6
o Uniaxial crushing stress (positive) (UnComSt): -1
There are 2 material properties needing to be input. One is concrete, one is rebar.
Preprocessor -> Material Props -> Material Models
Figure 7
+ Concrete (Material Model Number 1):
- Structural -> Linear -> Elastics -> Isotropic:
2
o EX (Youngs modulus): 2.9250E10 N/m (Please see previous calculation)
o PRXY (Poissons ratio): 0.2
TU NGUYEN 12
- Structural -> Linear -> Elastics -> Isotropic:
o EX (Youngs modulus): 2E11
o PRXY (Poissons ratio): 0.3
- Structural -> Nonlinear -> Inelastic -> Rate Independent -> Isotropic Hardening Plasticity ->
Mises Plasticity -> Bilinear
o Yield Stress: 460 N/mm2
o Tang mod: 0
Figure 9
VII.4. Modelling
The beam given is symmetrical geography and concentrated load, therefore, one half of the
beam will be taken for simplification of computer model.
Therefore, the model will have 936 nodes (6 nodes in Z direction, 6 nodes in Y direction, 26
nodes in X direction) then the number of element is 5x5x25 = 625 elements < 1000 elements.
Structure is modelled with first-six-nodes in Z direction, after that using COPY function to finish
the model.
Preprocessor -> Modelling -> Create -> Nodes -> In Active CS
Node X Y Z
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.05
3 0.00 0.00 0.10
4 0.00 0.00 0.15
5 0.00 0.00 0.20
6 0.00 0.00 0.25
TU NGUYEN 13
Due to the cover of concrete is 50mm, so that there are 2 differences of modelling concrete on
Y direction.
Co-ordinate Distance from NODE I to NODE J
Axis X 0.11
Axis Y 0.1 and 0,5
Axis Z 0.05
+ Generating node in Y direction for the rest of concrete. Picking node from 7 to 12.
Modelling -> Create -> Copy -> Nodes -> Copy
- ITEM NUMBER OF COPIES: 4
- DX (X-offset in active CS): 0
- DY (X-offset in active CS): 0.1
- DZ (X-offset in active CS): 0
- INC (Node number increment): 6
+ Generating node in Y direction for the rest of concrete. Picking node from 31 to 36.
Modelling -> Create -> Copy -> Nodes -> Copy
- ITEM NUMBER OF COPIES: 2
- DX (X-offset in active CS): 0
- DY (X-offset in active CS): 0.05
- DZ (X-offset in active CS): 0
- INC (Node number increment): 6
+ Generating node in X direction
- ITEM NUMBER OF COPIES: 26
- DX (X-offset in active CS): 0.11
- DY (X-offset in active CS): 0
- DZ (X-offset in active CS): 0
- INC (Node number increment): 30
SOLID65 will be created with all nodes. The node list should be opened to simply create each
element.
TU NGUYEN 14
Element Attributes of SOLID65:
- Element type of number : SOLID65
- Material Number: 1
- Real Constant set number: 1
Creating SOLID65 element, Command-line should be input E,1,2,38,37,7,8,44,43 because of a
simple creation in three-dimension (3D). Similar way to the other SOLID65 element.
TU NGUYEN 15
1
ELEMENTS
FEB 26 2010
12:01:25
Reinforcement
- Solution Type
o Solution -> Analysis Type -> New Analysis -> Choose Structural
o Solution -> Soln Controls
Frequency: Write every substep (Investigation cracks start to take shape in
the reinforced concrete)
Automatic time stepping: ON
- Define loads:
o Solution -> Define Loads -> Apply -> Structural -> Displacement -> On Node
- UX is applied for nodes from 901 to 936 at the end of the structural model. In fact
that when half-beam is modelled, the middle of the beam can not move in horizontal
direction because of rigid connection however that point can displace in vertical
direction. Therefore, UX will restrain movement in horizontal direction (X axis).
- UY and UZ is applied for nodes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Indeed, when the one side of
the beam is to be put on the brick pad. Therefore, the beam can move in X direction,
however it can not move in Y direction and Z direction. That UX, UZ will restrain
movement in the two-direction.
TU NGUYEN 16
1
ELEMENTS
FEB 26 2010
U
12:02:51
PRES-NORM
.150E+07
Y
Z X
Pressure
Beam support
Figure 12
o Solution -> Define Loads -> Apply -> Pressure -> On Elements (External load
applieds for investigating cracks and crush of concrete at L/3 = 1.8666(m))
The 40000N applies at the sixteenth element on top of the reinforced concrete.
However, the top surface is a rectangular with 0.11x0.25, therefore the pressure
applies for the area is:
40000
Pressure = = 1.5x106 N/m2 = 0.15x107N/m2
0.11 0.25
The solution will be terminated at 99% as shown in time-line history (figure 13) below
VII.8. Results
The result will show 38 sub-steps from 45% up to 99%. to view the region of crack and crush:
- General PostProc -> Read Results -> By Pick,
TU NGUYEN 17
- General PostProc -> Plot Results -> Concrete Plot -> Crack/Crush
o Plot symbols are located at: Integration pts
o Plot crack faces for: any cracks
Time history:
TU NGUYEN 18
1
CRACKS AND CRUSHING
FEB 17 2010
STEP=1
22:51:17
SUB =1
TIME=.45
Y
Z X
Y
Z X
Crack and crush appear more the last step as shown in figure below:
TU NGUYEN 19
1
CRACKS AND CRUSHING
FEB 26 2010
STEP=1
12:24:44
SUB =37
TIME=.980747
Y
Z X
Deformed Shape:
The displacement of the beam is increasing when the time is going up.
At 0.45: the deflection is 0.0136 m = 13.6 mm:
1
DISPLACEMENT
FEB 17 2010
STEP=1
22:53:17
SUB =1
TIME=.45
RSYS=0
DMX =.013588
Y
Z X
TU NGUYEN 20
1
DISPLACEMENT
STEP=1 FEB 26 2010
SUB =37 12:26:08
TIME=.980747
RSYS=0
DMX =.043747
Y
Z X
VIII. Discussion
VIII.1 Deflection
The deformed shaped of reinforced concrete calculated by hand has a small difference from
deflection ANSYS. Indeed, the result of hand-calculation is significantly smaller than the
deflection at time at 0.45, 26mm and 13.6mm respectively. This can explain that 26 mm is a
deflection of reinforced concrete in serviceability limit state. However, the time at 0.45 given by
computer analysed is the first step that computer can shows. The deflection of this step shows a
wide region of crack and crush, so that it is not a first step when the reinforced concrete starts
showing cracks and crushes. In addition, when the lateral load impacts on the reinforced
concrete up to reinforced concrete appearing cracks, the deformation of reinforced concrete is
given mm. Therefore, when the reinforced concrete is completely collapsed, the deflection is
more significantly than hand-calculation.
There is one disadvantage which is number of stepping. This step started at 0. 3 and then it
down to 0.05, however it increases slowly to 0.99. However, the result will show at 0.45. In this
situation, the sub-step could not be in control of result below 0.45. The programme will be
terminated at 0.99 in comparison with 99%.
ANSYS Hand-calculation
13.6mm 26 mm
TU NGUYEN 21
VIII.2 Result
The solution was solved in different cases:
1. Tang Mod of steel in stress-strain diagram is 2E9. In this case, the result will be terminated at
43%, sometimes it could not reach 30%.
2. The results will be converged at 83% when the support in Z direction (UZ) is to be removed.
3. Model with whole of beam, this situation is very good at result with 100%. However, element
of model is out of limitation and can not take full benefit of maximum element in the software.
The reason for this is the number of elements of the beam is more than half-beam (1250 and
625 respectively). The element of the software is given 1000 elements.
4. Element of reinforcement is used in 2 different ways. One model is with BEAM23, the other
uses LINK8 (3D Spar) for modelling. However, there is no difference between both models.
They show the same results in comparison (please see appendix for information of LINK8).
Type of models Success
BEAM23 full-beam modelled 100%
BEAM23 without brick plate 99%
BEAM23 with brick plate 83%
LINK8 Terminated at 75% due to error in symeqn called by dstmask
TU NGUYEN 22
Figure 19 Cracking line
However, the beam is modelled with a bearing plate, 0.11m long, 0.25m wide and 0.05m high
as shown in figure 20 below, it gives different result at approximately 83% of time-line (the
model of bearing plate is not converged at 82%) in comparison with the previous model. (figure
21). The area of reinforced concrete at bearing pad is now suffered by pressure as a
consequence. Therefore, the plate area shows cracks and crushes less than the previous
model
Z X
TU NGUYEN 23
1
CRACKS AND CRUSHING
MAR 1 2010
STEP=1
20:48:15
SUB =58
TIME=.827031
Y
Z X
1
CRACKS AND CRUSHING
MAR 1 2010
STEP=1
20:56:25
SUB =23
TIME=.830747
Y
Z X
VIII.5 Convergence
The solution was diverged. The reason for this is elements was solved with nonlinearity,
therefore they have to depend on properties such as large displacement analysis, plastic
material, gap elements, hook element and surface contacts. Then the solution will be
considered longer than a linear analysis. On the other hand, the arc-length method causes the
strain-stress curved equilibrium iterations to converge along an arc, thereby often preventing
divergence, even when the slope of the load versus deflection curve becomes zero or negative.
This iteration method is represented schematically as shown in figure below (Peter Budgell, ud).
TU NGUYEN 24
Figure 22: Converged diagram
Another reason for converged problems is shear transfer coefficients for an open crack and a
close crack. A number of preliminary analyses were attempted in this study with various values
for the coefficients within this range to avoid these problems (R.Santhakumar and et. al, 2007).
IX. Conclusion
The general explanation is that using 3D ANSYS modelling which is properly suggested the
nonlinear behaviour of RC beams with shear reinforcement.
ANSYS 3D concrete element is very good concerning the flexural and shear crack development
but poor concerning the crushing state. However this deficiency could be easier removed by
employing a certain multi-linear plasticity options available in ANSYS.
By using ANSYS smeared approach for beams with moderate shear span we are not able to
replicate satisfactory the softening due to big sliding emerging at the critical shear crack. That is
likely to be more realistically achieved by 3D discrete crack approach.
The assumptions suggest that we need some correction factors to adjust the values of material
parameters available from the experiment and convert them to effective parameters related to
the particular modelling.
An important feature of the present 3D modelling is that the flexural, shear/flexural and the
critical shear crack are prescribed, which means that their position and length must be
determined in advance using a certain method. In this document, the linear fracture mechanics.
A 3D isoperimetric ANSYS element with eight-node solid is used to represent the concrete
continuum and a beam element with plasticity options to model the reinforcement bars.
TU NGUYEN 25
Reference:
TU NGUYEN 26
Appendix A Log file without bearing plate
TU NGUYEN 27
!* Creating BEAM23 element D,P51X, , , , , ,UX, , , , , !* Analysis type
E,8,44 FLST,2,6,1,ORDE,2 TIME,1
E,9,45 FITEM,2,1 AUTOTS,1
E,10,46 FITEM,2,-6 NSUBST,0,0,0
E,11,47 D,P51X, , , , , ,UY,UZ, , , , OUTRES,ALL,ALL
FLST,4,4,2,ORDE,2 EPLOT
FITEM,4,626 FLST,5,5,2,ORDE,2 /VIEW,1,1,1,1
FITEM,4,-629 FITEM,5,396 /REPLOT
EGEN,25,36,P51X, , , , , , , , , , , FITEM,5,-400 FINISH
N, ,0,0,0.15,,,, CM,_Y,ELEM /SOL
!* Apply boundary condition ESEL, , , ,P51X ! /STATUS,SOLU
FLST,2,36,1,ORDE,2 CM,_Y1,ELEM SOLVE
FITEM,2,901 CMSEL,S,_Y !* DONE
FITEM,2,-936 CMDELE,_Y
SFE,_Y1,6,PRES, ,1.5e6, , ,
ET,2,LINK8
R,2,0.0001131, ,
!* please replace to BEAM23 element
TU NGUYEN 28