Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Hamid Shojaei
Department of Mathematics, Payame Noor University
Teheran, Iran
hshojaei2000@gmail.com
Abstract:- In this paper we introduced complete cone metric spaces and we proved some common fixed point
theorems of s- contraction mappings, by using coincidence point and weakly compatible condition two mappings on
complete cone metric spaces.
Keywords: Common fixed point; Coincidence point; Contraction; Complete cone metric space; Normal cone.
Huang and Zhang [5] recently have introduced the concept of cone metric space, where the set of real
numbers is replaced by an ordered Banach space, and they have established some fixed point theorems
for contractive type mappings in a normal cone metric space.
Subsequently, some other authors [1, 9] have generalized the results of Huang and Zhang [5] and have
studied the existence of common fixed points of a pair of self-mappings satisfying a contractive type
condition in the framework of normal cone metric spaces.
Vetro [9] extends the results of Abbas and Jungck [1] and obtains common fixed point of two mappings
satisfying a more general contractive type condition. In [3] Bari and Vetro obtain results on points of
coincidence and common fixed points in non-normal cone metric spaces. In this paper, we obtain points of
coincidence and common fixed points for - Contraction mappings satisfying generalized contractive type
conditions in a complete cone metric space.
Throughout this paper, we denote by the set of positive integers and by the set of real numbers.
Definition1.1 Let be a Real Banach space and a subset of . Then is called a Cone if and only if :
(ii) If ,
, , 0, and , , then + ,
241
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
(iii) If and , then = 0.
The Cone is called normal if there is some positive integer 1, such that, for 0 implies
, for all , . (The norm . is in Real Banach space )
Here, the least positive integer satisfying this equation is called the normal constant of .
is said to be regular if every increasing sequence which is bounded from above is convergent, that is,
if 1 is a sequence such that 1 2 for some , then there is such that lim
=0.
Equivalently, the Cone is regular iff every decreasing sequence which is bounded from below is
convergent.
(a) A convergent sequence if for every with 0 , there is such that for all ,
( , )
for some fixed in . We denote this by lim = or ,
.
(b) A Cauchy sequence if for every with 0 , there is such that for all , ,
( , ) .
A cone metric space (,
) is called to be complete if every Cauchy sequence is convergent i .
Proof. Let a regular Cone which is not normal. For all 1, choose , such that and
2 < . For each 1 , put = and = . Then, , , , are all in and, = 1
1
and 2 < , for all 1 . Since the series
=1 2 is convergent and is closed, there is an
1
element such that
=1 2 = . Since,
1 1 1
0 1 1 + 2 1 + 2 + 3 .
22 22 32
1
Thus,
=1 2 is convergent because is regular. Hence, lim = 0 Which is a contradiction.
2
243
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Main Results
Definition 2.2 Let be a self-map of a Cone metric space . The self-map is called a contraction if
there is some [0,1) such that, (, ) for all , .
(, )
Definition 2.3 Let be a self-map of Cone metric space . The self-map is called contraction if there
is [0,1) such that, (, ) for all , .
(, )
(i) ,
(, )
(ii) (, )
(, )
For all , , where [0,1). If and are weakly compatible, then two maps , have a unique
common fixed point and for each sequences 1 , 1 are converges to common fixed point.
1 = 0 , 2 = 1 = 0 . . . +1 = = (+1) 0 .
+1 , +1 , = , 1
(1 , 0 )
If > , we have;
, 1 + 1 , 2 + 2 , 3 + + 1 ,
1 + 2 + +
(1 , 0 )
(1 , 0 ).
1
( , ) (1 , 0 ) .
1
244
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
So;
, , +
( , )
( , ) .
, +
Let ,
(, ) (
( , ) ) 0 .
(, )+
(, ) = 0 .
= = .
= .
Therefore we have;
, = , , =
(, )
= = .
therefore;
(, 0 ) ,
, 0 = , 0 , 0 =
(i) ( , )
( , )
For all , , where [0,1) is a constant, then two maps , have a unique common fixed point in
.
Proof: From theorem 2.4, and have a unique common fixed point .
But = = = = ,
245
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
= = = = ,
1
Let [0, ) is a constant,
(, ) (, + , ), for all , . Then s have a common
2
coincidence point. Furthermore, if and are weakly compatible, then , have a unique common fixed
point in .
Proof: Let 0 . For all 1, let 1 = 0 and we define sequence such that = +1 = =
+1 0 . If = +1 for any , then = for all > hence is Cauchy sequence. If +1 for
some then, +1 , = , 1 , + 1 , 1
( +1 , + , 1 )
+1 , 1 , 1 =
( , 1 )
+1 , 1 , 1 =
( , 1 )
, , 1 + 1 , 2 + +1 ,
(1 , 0 )
1 + 2 + + (1 , 0 ) .
1
( , )
1
(1 , 0 ) .
, , .
( , ) 0
We have;
, , + ,
, + , + ,
, + , 1 ( , ) .
+
( , ) .
1 , , 1 +
246
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
, 1 1 , 1 + ( , ) .
.
(, ) 0
Now, let , be weakly compactable, then they commute at a coincidence point. Therefore,
= = . (1)
= .
which implies,
= . (2)
(, ) (, +
(, )
Which is equivalent to (, ) .
(, ) (, +
, , + , = , + , = 0.
Hence , 0, or
(, ) = 0. Therefore = = . Hence is a common fixed point of .
Now, let is another common fixed point of and . Substituting and in the contractive
condition can get,
(, ) (, + , )
Which is equivalent to ,
(, ) (, + , )
(, ) 0
Theorem 2.7 Let , be a complete Cone metric space, be a Cone and 0 < < 1. Let mappings
, : and be a contraction such that satisfy the following condition:
, , 1
, + ,
, , , , , .
2
247
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
If and are weakly compatible, then and have a unique common fixed point.
Proof: We shall first show that fixed point of one map is a fixed point of the another. Suppose that
= . Then form 1 ;
, = , , .
, + ,
Case III. , = , then
2
, + ,
,
2
In a similar manner we can be shown that any fixed point of is also the fixed point of .
+1 = , for 1.
, +1 , +1 = 1 ,
2 1 , 0 , 1 .
Case I. , = , , then
, +1 0 , 1 .
, +1 , +1 = , = , = 1 , 2 1 , 1 = 2 2 , 1
3 2 , 2 0 , 0 = 0 , 1 .
, + ,
Case III. , = , then
2
248
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
, +1 +1 , + , +1 =
2
[ +1 , +1 + , +1 ] = , +1 .
2 2
2 , 3 + + 1 ,
, = , 1 , + +1 , +2 +
+2 , +3 + + 1 ,
+ +2 + + 1
(0 , 1 ) (0 , 1 ) .
1
( , )
(0 , 1 )
1
, , +
( , )
, + , = , + ,
= , + , .
Let we have;
(, ) 0 .
(, ) (1 + )
(, ) = 0 .
= = .
, , +
( , )
, + , = , .
(, ) 0 when .
(, )
(, ) = 0
249
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
= = .
= = = = .
Therefore we have;
, = , , =
(, )
= = .
, 0 , 0
, 0 ,
, 0 0 , + , 0
2
In case we have;
(, 0 ) ,
, 0 = , 0 , 0 =
In Case II we have;
, 0 = , 0 , =
(, 0 )
, 0 = , 0 2 0 , + , 0
, 0 + , 0 =
(, 0 )
2 2
Therefore 1
(, 0 ) 0. Since 0 < 1 hence = 0.
References
[1] M. Abbas and G. Jungck, Common fixed point results for noncommuting mappings without continuity in cone
metric spaces, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 341, no. 1, pp. 416420, 2008.
[2] T. Abdeljawad, E. Karapmar and k. Tas. Common Fixed point Theorems in Cone Banach spaces, h. journal of
Math an sta, Volume 40(2) (2011). 211- 217.
[3] C. Di Bari and P. Vetro, -pairs and common fixed points in cone metric spaces, Rendiconti del Circolo
Matematico di Palermo, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 279285, 2008.
[4] k. Deimling, Nonlinear Functional Analysis (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New york, Tokyo, 1985).
250
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 5 Issue: 5 241 251
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
[5] L.-G. Huang and X. Zhang, Cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems of contractive mappings, Journal
of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 332, no. 2, pp. 14681476, 2007.
[6] Sh. Rezapour, R. Hamlbarani. Some note on the paper "Cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems of
contractive mappings", j. Math. Anal. Appl. 347(2008)719- 724
[7] I. Sahin , M.Telci. Fixed points of Contractive Mappings on Complete Cone metric Spaces, H. journal of Math
and Sta, Volume 38(1) (2009), 59- 67
[8] H.Shojaei, R. Mortezaei, J. Math. Computer Sci., 6 (2013), 201- 209.
[9] P. Vetro, Common fixed points in cone metric spaces, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo. Serie
II, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 464468, 2007.
[10] E. Zeidler, Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications, volume I, Fixed point Theorems (springer-
Verlag, 1993).
251
IJRITCC | May 2017, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________