Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(ES).
tables report four main indicators: Employment Share, Employment Expansion, Employment Contraction, and Net Employmen
Change. These indicators are based on Aga, Francis, and Rodriguez Meza (2015), which investigates what types of firms are the
employers, and what types of firms create or lose jobs at a faster rate. The authors used methods similar to Haltiwanger, Jarmi
Miranda (2013) who, using U.S census data, identified common pitfalls in measuring contributions to aggregate job creation an
destruction by firms of various characteristics.
Employment Share measures the share of the aggregate stock of permanent, full-time employment across selected firm
characteristics (e.g. small versus large, manufacturing versus services, female owned versus male owned, etc.). It shows how th
aggregate employment in a countrys private sector is distributed across these groups of firms.
Employment Expansion measures the annual rate of expansion of the aggregate stock of permanent, full-time employment. It
takes firms that, on net, expanded their employment and computes the yearly growth rate in the aggregate stock of permanen
time employment.
Employment Contraction measures the annual rate of contraction of the aggregate stock of permanent, full-time employment
takes firms that, on net, reduced their employment and computes the yearly rate of contraction in the aggregate stock of perm
full-time employment.
Net Employment Change measures the annual rate of net change in the aggregate stock of permanent, full-time employment.
all firms and computes net change of aggregate stock, i.e. expansion less contraction. Naturally, this indicator equals employme
expansion minus employment contraction. Note that this indicator, unlike the Annual Employment Growth indicator that is pro
as part of the full set of firm-level ES indicators, measures aggregate growth of employment as opposed to the average firm-lev
growth.
Note that employment expansion and contraction indicators are similar to job creation and destruction indicators often presen
the literature on jobs with an important distinction that the latter account for firms exit and entry while the former do not.
Employment expansion, contraction and net change are computed using two basic variables of the Enterprise Surveys: l1 and l
variable l1 collects information about permanent, full-time employees during the last complete fiscal year, while l2 asks the sam
figure two fiscal years prior. See exact wording of the corresponding questions in questionnaires available at:
http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/methodology. Note that when considering the indicators of employment expansion, contrac
and net change disaggregated by size, firms are classified using the size category based on the mid-point between l1 and l2, tha
(l1+l2)/2.
The tables report the above four indicators broken down by firm size, sector, location, ownership type, gender of top manager,
exporter type. To interpret indicators, consider the example on the right:
Based on these figures, Economy X has expanded its aggregate stock of permanent, full-time employment by 3.7%, and contra
5.1%, giving rise to the net change of -1.4%. The services sector expanded less than manufacturing, 2.8% compared with 6.9%,
nevertheless accounted for 58.9% of the expansion. This is because services account for 75.2% of total stock of employment, a
consequently, 2.8% growth means larger growth in terms of absolute number of employment added.
Services firms also contracted more, 5.4% compared to 4.0% for manufacturing firms, and accounted for 82.7% of total employ
contraction. While Manufacturing firms added jobs in aggregate (2.9%), services firms contracted in aggregate (-2.6%). Breakin
the share of net change by sector, Manufacturing made a positive contribution of 47.9%, which was completely overwhelmed
negative contribution of Services -147.9%.
References
Aga, Gemechu A.; Francis, David C.; Rodriguez Meza, Jorge Luis (2015) SMEs, Age, and Jobs: A Review of the Literature, Metric
Haltiwanger, J. Jarmin, R. and Miranda, J (2013) Who Creates Job: Small Versus Large Versus Young, The Review of Economics
Statistics, 95(2): pp 347-361
Employment Share Employment Expansion Employment Contraction
Sector Firms that Share in Firms that
Indicator N Expanded Expansion Expansion Contracted
All 100.0% 1470 39.5% 3.7% 100.0% 26.5%
Manufacturing 24.8% 37.3% 6.9% 41.1% 30.8%
Services 75.2% 41.4% 2.8% 58.9% 22.8%
Employment Contraction Net Employment Change
Share in Net
Contraction Contraction Change Share N
5.1% 100.0% -1.4% -100.0% 1411
4.0% 17.3% 2.9% 47.9%
5.4% 82.7% -2.6% -147.9%
Las tablas presentadas aqu proveen una visin esttica del empleo en el sector privado basada en las Encuestas de Empresas (
tablas presentan cuatro indicadores: la proporcin del empleo, la expansin del empleo, la contraccin del empleo y el cambio
empleo. Estos indicadores estn basados en Aga, Francis and Rodriguez Meza (2015) en donde se investiga qu tipo de empres
principales empleadoras, y cules son las que crean o pierden empleo ms rpidamente. Los autores usan mtodos similares a
Hatiwanger, Jarmin and Miranda (2013), quienes identificaron algunos errores comunes en la medicin agregada de la creacin
destruccin de empleo por empresas utilizando datos censales de los Estados Unidos.
La Proporcin del Empleo mide la proporcin del empleo permanente de tiempo completo desagregado a travs de determina
caractersticas de las empresas (por ejemplo, pequeas versus grandes, manufactura versus servicios, de propiedad femenina v
propiedad masculina, etc.). Representa la distribucin del empleo agregado total desagregado a travs de los subgrupos defin
cada caracterstica.
La Expansin del Empleo mide la tasa anual de expansin del empleo permanente de tiempo completo agregado. Considera
las empresas que expanden su empleo neto y calcula la tasa de crecimiento anual en el empleo permanente de tiempo comple
agregado.
La Contraccin del Empleo mide la tasa anual de contraccin en el empleo permanente de tiempo completo agregado. Consid
nicamente las empresas que redujeron su empleo y calcula la tasa anual de contraccin en el empleo permanente de tiempo
El Cambio Neto en el Empleo mide la tasa anual de cambio neto en el empleo permanente de tiempo complete agregado. Con
las empresas y calcula el cambio neto, o sea expansin menos contraccin, en el empleo agregado. Como consiguiente este ind
igual a la Expansin del Empleo menos la Contraccin del Empleo. Ntese que este indicador, a diferencia de la Tasa Anual de C
en el Empleo que es parte de los indicadores a nivel de empresas de las Encuestas de Empresas, mide el crecimiento agregado
empleo a diferencia del promedio del crecimiento a nivel de empresa.
Ntese que la Expansin del Empleo y la Contraccin del Empleo son indicadores similares a los indicadores de Creacin de Em
Destruccin de Empleo que usualmente se citan en la literatura de empleo pero presentan una diferencia importante: los indic
literatura toman en cuenta la entrada y salida de empresas mientras que los indicadores aqu presentados no lo pueden hacer.
La expansin, la contraccin y el cambio neto en el empleo se calculan utilizando dos variables bsicas de las Encuestas de Emp
l2. La variable l1 contiene la informacin sobre el nmero de empleados permanentes de tiempo completo en el ltimo ao fis
completo y la variable l2 contiene la misma informacin pero para dos aos fiscales en el pasado. Para revisar la redaccin exa
preguntas los cuestionarios se pueden encontrar en: http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/methodology. Ntese que cuando los
de expansin, contraccin y cambio neto en el empleo se desagregan por tamao, las empresas se clasifican por su tamao me
y l2, o sea (l1+l2)/2.
Las tablas presentan los cuatro indicadores desagregados por tamao de empresa, sector de actividad, ubicacin, tipo de prop
gnero del Gerente General y tipo de exportador. Para interpretar los indicadores considere el siguiente ejemplo:
Estos nmeros indican que el empleo permanente de tiempo completo se expandi en 3.7% y se contrajo en 5.1% lo que resul
cambio neto de -1.4%. El sector de servicios se expandi relativamente menos que el sector manufacturero, 2.8% comparado
pero a pesar de esto servicios representa 58.9% de la expansin. Esto se explica porque los servicios representan 75.2% del em
por consiguiente un crecimiento de 2.8% conlleva un mayor crecimiento el nmero absoluto de empleos que se agregaron.
Las empresas de servicios tambin se contrajeron ms, 5.4% comparado con 4% para las empresas de manufacturas, y represe
de la contraccin total del empleo. Mientras que las empresas manufactureras de manera agregada agregaron empleos (2.9%)
empresas de servicios se contrajeron (-2.6%). Desagregando el cambio neto por sector, las manufacturas tuvieron una contribu
positiva de 47.9%, la cual fue totalmente dominada por la gran contribucin negativa de los servicios -147.9%.
References
Aga, Gemechu A.; Francis, David C.; Rodriguez Meza, Jorge Luis (2015) SMEs, Age, and Jobs: A Review of the Literature, Metric
Haltiwanger, J. Jarmin, R. and Miranda, J (2013) Who Creates Job: Small Versus Large Versus Young, The Review of Economics
Statistics, 95(2): pp 347-361
Proporcin del empleo Expansin del empleo Contraccin del emp
Empresas Proporcin Empresas
Sector que se en la que se
Indicador N expandieron Expancin expansin contrayeron
All 100.0% 1470 39.5% 3.7% 100.0% 26.5%
Manufacturing 24.8% 37.3% 6.9% 41.1% 30.8%
Services 75.2% 41.4% 2.8% 58.9% 22.8%
Contraccin del empleo Cambio neto en el empleo
Proporcin
en la Cambio
Contraccin contraccin neto Proporcin N
5.1% 100.0% -1.4% -100.0% 1411
4.0% 17.3% 2.9% 47.9%
5.4% 82.7% -2.6% -147.9%
Employment Share Employment Expan
Income
Survey Group Region Size Indicator N
Afghanistan 2008 LI SAR All 100.0% 522
Afghanistan 2008 LI SAR Small (5-19) 26.2%
Afghanistan 2008 LI SAR Medium (20-99) 42.5%
Afghanistan 2008 LI SAR Large (100+) 31.2%
Afghanistan 2014 LI SAR All 100.0% 396
Afghanistan 2014 LI SAR Small (5-19) 27.4%
Afghanistan 2014 LI SAR Medium (20-99) 41.2%
Afghanistan 2014 LI SAR Large (100+) 31.4%
Albania 2007 LMI ECA All 100.0% 296
Albania 2007 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 24.1%
Albania 2007 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 40.4%
Albania 2007 LMI ECA Large (100+) 35.4%
Albania 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 337
Albania 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 29.9%
Albania 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 43.5%
Albania 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 26.7%
Angola 2006 LMI AFR All 100.0% 417
Angola 2006 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 67.9%
Angola 2006 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 32.1%
Angola 2006 LMI AFR Large (100+) 0.0%
Angola 2010 LMI AFR All 100.0% 348
Angola 2010 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 18.2%
Angola 2010 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 36.2%
Angola 2010 LMI AFR Large (100+) 45.5%
Antigua and Barbuda 2010 UMI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 150
Antigua and Barbuda 2010 UMI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 32.4%
Antigua and Barbuda 2010 UMI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 46.3%
Antigua and Barbuda 2010 UMI HI: nonO Large (100+) 21.2%
Argentina 2006 UMI LAC All 100.0% 1050
Argentina 2006 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 4.9%
Argentina 2006 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 16.3%
Argentina 2006 UMI LAC Large (100+) 78.7%
Argentina 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 1042
Argentina 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 9.9%
Argentina 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 30.7%
Argentina 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 59.4%
Armenia 2009 LMI ECA All 100.0% 371
Armenia 2009 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 11.4%
Armenia 2009 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 31.2%
Armenia 2009 LMI ECA Large (100+) 57.4%
Armenia 2013 LMI ECA All 100.0% 356
Armenia 2013 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 8.9%
Armenia 2013 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 35.5%
Armenia 2013 LMI ECA Large (100+) 55.6%
Azerbaijan 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 375
Azerbaijan 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 14.9%
Azerbaijan 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 32.6%
Azerbaijan 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 52.5%
Azerbaijan 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 383
Azerbaijan 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 20.6%
Azerbaijan 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 48.2%
Azerbaijan 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 31.2%
Bahamas 2010 HI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 150
Bahamas 2010 HI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 11.9%
Bahamas 2010 HI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 31.0%
Bahamas 2010 HI HI: nonO Large (100+) 57.1%
Bangladesh 2007 LI SAR All 100.0% 1502
Bangladesh 2007 LI SAR Small (5-19) 3.0%
Bangladesh 2007 LI SAR Medium (20-99) 6.2%
Bangladesh 2007 LI SAR Large (100+) 90.8%
Bangladesh 2013 LI SAR All 100.0% 1436
Bangladesh 2013 LI SAR Small (5-19) 2.2%
Bangladesh 2013 LI SAR Medium (20-99) 7.0%
Bangladesh 2013 LI SAR Large (100+) 90.8%
Barbados 2010 HI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 150
Barbados 2010 HI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 19.3%
Barbados 2010 HI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 33.6%
Barbados 2010 HI HI: nonO Large (100+) 47.1%
Belarus 2008 UMI ECA All 100.0% 273
Belarus 2008 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 4.8%
Belarus 2008 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 13.9%
Belarus 2008 UMI ECA Large (100+) 81.2%
Belarus 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 358
Belarus 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 12.9%
Belarus 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 24.7%
Belarus 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 62.4%
Belize 2010 LMI LAC All 100.0% 149
Belize 2010 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 30.9%
Belize 2010 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 54.2%
Belize 2010 LMI LAC Large (100+) 14.9%
Benin 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 146
Benin 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 37.1%
Benin 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 39.4%
Benin 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 23.5%
Benin 2016 LI AFR All 100.0% 149
Benin 2016 LI AFR Small (5-19) 9.2%
Benin 2016 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 25.8%
Benin 2016 LI AFR Large (100+) 65.0%
Bhutan 2009 LMI SAR All 100.0% 249
Bhutan 2009 LMI SAR Small (5-19) 26.2%
Bhutan 2009 LMI SAR Medium (20-99) 28.0%
Bhutan 2009 LMI SAR Large (100+) 45.9%
Bhutan 2015 LMI SAR All 100.0% 253
Bhutan 2015 LMI SAR Small (5-19) 28.9%
Bhutan 2015 LMI SAR Medium (20-99) 42.5%
Bhutan 2015 LMI SAR Large (100+) 28.6%
Bolivia 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 607
Bolivia 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 16.5%
Bolivia 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 43.3%
Bolivia 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 40.2%
Bolivia 2010 LMI LAC All 100.0% 362
Bolivia 2010 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 9.3%
Bolivia 2010 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 41.5%
Bolivia 2010 LMI LAC Large (100+) 49.2%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 358
Bosnia and Herzegovina 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 11.0%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 32.8%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 56.2%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 356
Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 17.6%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 51.3%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 31.1%
Botswana 2006 UMI AFR All 100.0% 336
Botswana 2006 UMI AFR Small (5-19) 23.3%
Botswana 2006 UMI AFR Medium (20-99) 33.0%
Botswana 2006 UMI AFR Large (100+) 43.7%
Botswana 2010 UMI AFR All 100.0% 265
Botswana 2010 UMI AFR Small (5-19) 11.4%
Botswana 2010 UMI AFR Medium (20-99) 23.5%
Botswana 2010 UMI AFR Large (100+) 65.1%
Brazil 2009 UMI LAC All 100.0% 1770
Brazil 2009 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 16.8%
Brazil 2009 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 29.9%
Brazil 2009 UMI LAC Large (100+) 53.3%
Bulgaria 2007 UMI ECA All 100.0% 1007
Bulgaria 2007 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 15.2%
Bulgaria 2007 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 38.7%
Bulgaria 2007 UMI ECA Large (100+) 46.1%
Bulgaria 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 286
Bulgaria 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 19.8%
Bulgaria 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 32.9%
Bulgaria 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 47.4%
Bulgaria 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 290
Bulgaria 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 17.6%
Bulgaria 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 29.8%
Bulgaria 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 52.7%
Burkina Faso 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 389
Burkina Faso 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 21.7%
Burkina Faso 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 29.9%
Burkina Faso 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 48.4%
Burundi 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 268
Burundi 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 51.0%
Burundi 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 34.3%
Burundi 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 14.7%
Burundi 2014 LI AFR All 100.0% 152
Burundi 2014 LI AFR Small (5-19) 28.1%
Burundi 2014 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 61.3%
Burundi 2014 LI AFR Large (100+) 10.5%
Cabo Verde 2009 LMI AFR All 100.0% 151
Cabo Verde 2009 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 29.6%
Cabo Verde 2009 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 37.1%
Cabo Verde 2009 LMI AFR Large (100+) 33.2%
Cambodia 2013 LI EAP All 100.0% 472
Cambodia 2013 LI EAP Small (5-19) 10.8%
Cambodia 2013 LI EAP Medium (20-99) 7.9%
Cambodia 2013 LI EAP Large (100+) 81.4%
Cambodia 2016 LMI EAP All 100.0% 372
Cambodia 2016 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 16.7%
Cambodia 2016 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 12.5%
Cambodia 2016 LMI EAP Large (100+) 70.9%
Cameroon 2009 LMI AFR All 100.0% 361
Cameroon 2009 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 12.1%
Cameroon 2009 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 21.3%
Cameroon 2009 LMI AFR Large (100+) 66.7%
Cameroon 2016 LMI AFR All 100.0% 355
Cameroon 2016 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 27.3%
Cameroon 2016 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 31.7%
Cameroon 2016 LMI AFR Large (100+) 41.0%
Central African Republic 2011 LI AFR All 100.0% 147
Central African Republic 2011 LI AFR Small (5-19) 28.7%
Central African Republic 2011 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 40.9%
Central African Republic 2011 LI AFR Large (100+) 30.4%
Chad 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 148
Chad 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 19.9%
Chad 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 42.9%
Chad 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 37.2%
Chile 2006 UMI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 1004
Chile 2006 UMI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 5.2%
Chile 2006 UMI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 11.5%
Chile 2006 UMI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 83.3%
Chile 2010 UMI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 1031
Chile 2010 UMI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 2.3%
Chile 2010 UMI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 11.3%
Chile 2010 UMI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 86.4%
China 2012 UMI EAP All 100.0% 2672
China 2012 UMI EAP Small (5-19) 11.0%
China 2012 UMI EAP Medium (20-99) 28.4%
China 2012 UMI EAP Large (100+) 60.6%
Colombia 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 988
Colombia 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 22.2%
Colombia 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 45.5%
Colombia 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 32.4%
Colombia 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 938
Colombia 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 16.1%
Colombia 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 17.1%
Colombia 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 66.8%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 334
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 47.8%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 33.5%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 18.7%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2010 LI AFR All 100.0% 353
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2010 LI AFR Small (5-19) 20.7%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2010 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 20.8%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2010 LI AFR Large (100+) 58.5%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2013 LI AFR All 100.0% 520
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2013 LI AFR Small (5-19) 45.7%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2013 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 33.6%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2013 LI AFR Large (100+) 20.7%
Congo, Rep. 2009 LMI AFR All 100.0% 142
Congo, Rep. 2009 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 12.9%
Congo, Rep. 2009 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 36.9%
Congo, Rep. 2009 LMI AFR Large (100+) 50.2%
Costa Rica 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 533
Costa Rica 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 8.1%
Costa Rica 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 23.1%
Costa Rica 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 68.8%
Croatia 2007 UMI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 630
Croatia 2007 UMI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 11.3%
Croatia 2007 UMI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 40.2%
Croatia 2007 UMI HI: nonO Large (100+) 48.5%
Croatia 2013 HI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 352
Croatia 2013 HI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 26.5%
Croatia 2013 HI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 36.9%
Croatia 2013 HI HI: nonO Large (100+) 36.6%
Czech Republic 2009 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 242
Czech Republic 2009 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 12.3%
Czech Republic 2009 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 34.9%
Czech Republic 2009 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 52.8%
Czech Republic 2013 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 248
Czech Republic 2013 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 17.0%
Czech Republic 2013 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 35.2%
Czech Republic 2013 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 47.8%
Cte d'Ivoire 2009 LMI AFR All 100.0% 518
Cte d'Ivoire 2009 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 43.6%
Cte d'Ivoire 2009 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 28.3%
Cte d'Ivoire 2009 LMI AFR Large (100+) 28.1%
Cte d'Ivoire 2016 LMI AFR All 100.0% 345
Cte d'Ivoire 2016 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 18.5%
Cte d'Ivoire 2016 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 27.4%
Cte d'Ivoire 2016 LMI AFR Large (100+) 54.0%
Djibouti 2013 LMI MNA All 100.0% 257
Djibouti 2013 LMI MNA Small (5-19) 22.5%
Djibouti 2013 LMI MNA Medium (20-99) 37.1%
Djibouti 2013 LMI MNA Large (100+) 40.4%
Dominica 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 149
Dominica 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 36.9%
Dominica 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 46.0%
Dominica 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 17.1%
Dominican Republic 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 360
Dominican Republic 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 13.9%
Dominican Republic 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 28.0%
Dominican Republic 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 58.1%
Dominican Republic 2016 UMI LAC All 100.0% 354
Dominican Republic 2016 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 13.4%
Dominican Republic 2016 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 21.9%
Dominican Republic 2016 UMI LAC Large (100+) 64.7%
Ecuador 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 649
Ecuador 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 14.9%
Ecuador 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 30.7%
Ecuador 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 54.5%
Ecuador 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 365
Ecuador 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 13.6%
Ecuador 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 20.6%
Ecuador 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 65.8%
Egypt, Arab Rep. 2013 LMI MNA All 100.0% 2820
Egypt, Arab Rep. 2013 LMI MNA Small (5-19) 16.4%
Egypt, Arab Rep. 2013 LMI MNA Medium (20-99) 32.0%
Egypt, Arab Rep. 2013 LMI MNA Large (100+) 51.6%
Egypt, Arab Rep. 2016 LMI MNA All 100.0% 1795
Egypt, Arab Rep. 2016 LMI MNA Small (5-19) 12.2%
Egypt, Arab Rep. 2016 LMI MNA Medium (20-99) 21.4%
Egypt, Arab Rep. 2016 LMI MNA Large (100+) 66.4%
El Salvador 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 690
El Salvador 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 16.2%
El Salvador 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 23.4%
El Salvador 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 60.4%
El Salvador 2010 LMI LAC All 100.0% 355
El Salvador 2010 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 12.5%
El Salvador 2010 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 22.7%
El Salvador 2010 LMI LAC Large (100+) 64.8%
El Salvador 2016 LMI LAC All 100.0% 714
El Salvador 2016 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 19.7%
El Salvador 2016 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 29.7%
El Salvador 2016 LMI LAC Large (100+) 50.6%
Eritrea 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 177
Eritrea 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 39.7%
Eritrea 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 47.8%
Eritrea 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 12.5%
Estonia 2009 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 271
Estonia 2009 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 23.0%
Estonia 2009 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 40.2%
Estonia 2009 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 36.8%
Estonia 2013 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 270
Estonia 2013 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 26.9%
Estonia 2013 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 40.3%
Estonia 2013 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 32.8%
Ethiopia 2011 LI AFR All 100.0% 628
Ethiopia 2011 LI AFR Small (5-19) 11.8%
Ethiopia 2011 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 33.5%
Ethiopia 2011 LI AFR Large (100+) 54.7%
Ethiopia 2015 LI AFR All 100.0% 826
Ethiopia 2015 LI AFR Small (5-19) 14.2%
Ethiopia 2015 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 37.7%
Ethiopia 2015 LI AFR Large (100+) 48.1%
Fiji 2009 UMI EAP All 100.0% 159
Fiji 2009 UMI EAP Small (5-19) 17.2%
Fiji 2009 UMI EAP Medium (20-99) 33.6%
Fiji 2009 UMI EAP Large (100+) 49.2%
Gabon 2009 UMI AFR All 100.0% 166
Gabon 2009 UMI AFR Small (5-19) 21.7%
Gabon 2009 UMI AFR Medium (20-99) 35.2%
Gabon 2009 UMI AFR Large (100+) 43.1%
Gambia 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 171
Gambia 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 29.4%
Gambia 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 55.3%
Gambia 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 15.2%
Georgia 2008 LMI ECA All 100.0% 364
Georgia 2008 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 17.1%
Georgia 2008 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 39.8%
Georgia 2008 LMI ECA Large (100+) 43.1%
Georgia 2013 LMI ECA All 100.0% 354
Georgia 2013 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 29.5%
Georgia 2013 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 45.7%
Georgia 2013 LMI ECA Large (100+) 24.8%
Ghana 2007 LI AFR All 100.0% 487
Ghana 2007 LI AFR Small (5-19) 20.0%
Ghana 2007 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 22.0%
Ghana 2007 LI AFR Large (100+) 58.0%
Ghana 2013 LMI AFR All 100.0% 710
Ghana 2013 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 19.1%
Ghana 2013 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 33.0%
Ghana 2013 LMI AFR Large (100+) 47.9%
Grenada 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 152
Grenada 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 25.9%
Grenada 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 39.5%
Grenada 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 34.6%
Guatemala 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 518
Guatemala 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 20.8%
Guatemala 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 33.9%
Guatemala 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 45.3%
Guatemala 2010 LMI LAC All 100.0% 588
Guatemala 2010 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 5.2%
Guatemala 2010 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 14.3%
Guatemala 2010 LMI LAC Large (100+) 80.6%
Guinea 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 218
Guinea 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 62.5%
Guinea 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 29.5%
Guinea 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 8.0%
Guinea 2016 LI AFR All 100.0% 147
Guinea 2016 LI AFR Small (5-19) 41.7%
Guinea 2016 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 28.9%
Guinea 2016 LI AFR Large (100+) 29.5%
Guinea-Bissau 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 154
Guinea-Bissau 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 68.6%
Guinea-Bissau 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 31.4%
Guinea-Bissau 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 0.0%
Guyana 2010 LMI LAC All 100.0% 164
Guyana 2010 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 5.8%
Guyana 2010 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 23.4%
Guyana 2010 LMI LAC Large (100+) 70.9%
Honduras 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 433
Honduras 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 5.5%
Honduras 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 12.0%
Honduras 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 82.5%
Honduras 2010 LMI LAC All 100.0% 350
Honduras 2010 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 10.6%
Honduras 2010 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 16.0%
Honduras 2010 LMI LAC Large (100+) 73.4%
Hungary 2009 HI ECA All 100.0% 290
Hungary 2009 HI ECA Small (5-19) 9.2%
Hungary 2009 HI ECA Medium (20-99) 25.4%
Hungary 2009 HI ECA Large (100+) 65.4%
Hungary 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 299
Hungary 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 25.8%
Hungary 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 31.3%
Hungary 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 42.8%
India 2014 LMI SAR All 100.0% 9214
India 2014 LMI SAR Small (5-19) 7.7%
India 2014 LMI SAR Medium (20-99) 31.3%
India 2014 LMI SAR Large (100+) 60.9%
Indonesia 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 1436
Indonesia 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 35.7%
Indonesia 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 20.8%
Indonesia 2009 LMI EAP Large (100+) 43.5%
Indonesia 2015 LMI EAP All 100.0% 1315
Indonesia 2015 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 29.8%
Indonesia 2015 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 29.2%
Indonesia 2015 LMI EAP Large (100+) 41.0%
Iraq 2011 LMI MNA All 100.0% 746
Iraq 2011 LMI MNA Small (5-19) 73.1%
Iraq 2011 LMI MNA Medium (20-99) 26.9%
Iraq 2011 LMI MNA Large (100+) 0.0%
Israel 2013 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 476
Israel 2013 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 24.3%
Israel 2013 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 30.3%
Israel 2013 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 45.3%
Jamaica 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 371
Jamaica 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 28.1%
Jamaica 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 40.7%
Jamaica 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 31.2%
Jordan 2013 UMI MNA All 100.0% 569
Jordan 2013 UMI MNA Small (5-19) 15.5%
Jordan 2013 UMI MNA Medium (20-99) 27.9%
Jordan 2013 UMI MNA Large (100+) 56.6%
Kazakhstan 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 538
Kazakhstan 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 9.0%
Kazakhstan 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 28.4%
Kazakhstan 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 62.6%
Kazakhstan 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 595
Kazakhstan 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 15.6%
Kazakhstan 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 39.7%
Kazakhstan 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 44.7%
Kenya 2007 LI AFR All 100.0% 652
Kenya 2007 LI AFR Small (5-19) 13.8%
Kenya 2007 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 28.9%
Kenya 2007 LI AFR Large (100+) 57.3%
Kenya 2013 LI AFR All 100.0% 767
Kenya 2013 LI AFR Small (5-19) 11.3%
Kenya 2013 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 26.0%
Kenya 2013 LI AFR Large (100+) 62.7%
Kosovo 2009 LMI ECA All 100.0% 265
Kosovo 2009 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 40.2%
Kosovo 2009 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 34.7%
Kosovo 2009 LMI ECA Large (100+) 25.1%
Kosovo 2013 LMI ECA All 100.0% 199
Kosovo 2013 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 20.6%
Kosovo 2013 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 46.4%
Kosovo 2013 LMI ECA Large (100+) 33.0%
Kyrgyz Republic 2009 LI ECA All 100.0% 234
Kyrgyz Republic 2009 LI ECA Small (5-19) 11.9%
Kyrgyz Republic 2009 LI ECA Medium (20-99) 28.5%
Kyrgyz Republic 2009 LI ECA Large (100+) 59.7%
Kyrgyz Republic 2013 LMI ECA All 100.0% 266
Kyrgyz Republic 2013 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 9.2%
Kyrgyz Republic 2013 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 34.6%
Kyrgyz Republic 2013 LMI ECA Large (100+) 56.2%
Lao PDR 2009 LI EAP All 100.0% 360
Lao PDR 2009 LI EAP Small (5-19) 26.1%
Lao PDR 2009 LI EAP Medium (20-99) 28.9%
Lao PDR 2009 LI EAP Large (100+) 45.0%
Lao PDR 2012 LMI EAP All 100.0% 269
Lao PDR 2012 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 11.1%
Lao PDR 2012 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 28.1%
Lao PDR 2012 LMI EAP Large (100+) 60.8%
Lao PDR 2016 LMI EAP All 100.0% 366
Lao PDR 2016 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 53.0%
Lao PDR 2016 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 20.5%
Lao PDR 2016 LMI EAP Large (100+) 26.6%
Latvia 2009 HI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 267
Latvia 2009 HI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 17.0%
Latvia 2009 HI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 33.3%
Latvia 2009 HI HI: nonO Large (100+) 49.7%
Latvia 2013 HI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 330
Latvia 2013 HI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 30.3%
Latvia 2013 HI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 44.8%
Latvia 2013 HI HI: nonO Large (100+) 24.9%
Lebanon 2013 UMI MNA All 100.0% 555
Lebanon 2013 UMI MNA Small (5-19) 19.3%
Lebanon 2013 UMI MNA Medium (20-99) 39.9%
Lebanon 2013 UMI MNA Large (100+) 40.8%
Lesotho 2009 LMI AFR All 100.0% 146
Lesotho 2009 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 13.0%
Lesotho 2009 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 25.1%
Lesotho 2009 LMI AFR Large (100+) 61.8%
Lesotho 2016 LMI AFR All 100.0% 147
Lesotho 2016 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 13.7%
Lesotho 2016 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 14.3%
Lesotho 2016 LMI AFR Large (100+) 72.0%
Liberia 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 147
Liberia 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 66.9%
Liberia 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 25.2%
Liberia 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 7.9%
Lithuania 2009 UMI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 274
Lithuania 2009 UMI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 17.6%
Lithuania 2009 UMI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 39.8%
Lithuania 2009 UMI HI: nonO Large (100+) 42.5%
Lithuania 2013 HI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 262
Lithuania 2013 HI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 27.8%
Lithuania 2013 HI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 43.8%
Lithuania 2013 HI HI: nonO Large (100+) 28.4%
Macedonia, FYR 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 363
Macedonia, FYR 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 15.5%
Macedonia, FYR 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 37.2%
Macedonia, FYR 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 47.3%
Macedonia, FYR 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 356
Macedonia, FYR 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 45.6%
Macedonia, FYR 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 35.3%
Macedonia, FYR 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 19.2%
Madagascar 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 444
Madagascar 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 9.5%
Madagascar 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 24.0%
Madagascar 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 66.4%
Madagascar 2013 LI AFR All 100.0% 511
Madagascar 2013 LI AFR Small (5-19) 9.1%
Madagascar 2013 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 18.1%
Madagascar 2013 LI AFR Large (100+) 72.8%
Malawi 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 148
Malawi 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 9.1%
Malawi 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 20.5%
Malawi 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 70.3%
Malawi 2014 LI AFR All 100.0% 496
Malawi 2014 LI AFR Small (5-19) 10.8%
Malawi 2014 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 21.3%
Malawi 2014 LI AFR Large (100+) 67.9%
Malaysia 2015 UMI EAP All 100.0% 981
Malaysia 2015 UMI EAP Small (5-19) 19.3%
Malaysia 2015 UMI EAP Medium (20-99) 18.2%
Malaysia 2015 UMI EAP Large (100+) 62.5%
Mali 2007 LI AFR All 100.0% 478
Mali 2007 LI AFR Small (5-19) 51.9%
Mali 2007 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 48.1%
Mali 2007 LI AFR Large (100+) 0.0%
Mali 2010 LI AFR All 100.0% 347
Mali 2010 LI AFR Small (5-19) 45.9%
Mali 2010 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 40.5%
Mali 2010 LI AFR Large (100+) 13.6%
Mali 2016 LI AFR All 100.0% 182
Mali 2016 LI AFR Small (5-19) 13.6%
Mali 2016 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 42.8%
Mali 2016 LI AFR Large (100+) 43.5%
Mauritania 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 234
Mauritania 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 44.7%
Mauritania 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 38.3%
Mauritania 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 17.0%
Mauritania 2014 LMI AFR All 100.0% 146
Mauritania 2014 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 9.9%
Mauritania 2014 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 34.9%
Mauritania 2014 LMI AFR Large (100+) 55.2%
Mauritius 2009 UMI AFR All 100.0% 396
Mauritius 2009 UMI AFR Small (5-19) 11.1%
Mauritius 2009 UMI AFR Medium (20-99) 26.8%
Mauritius 2009 UMI AFR Large (100+) 62.1%
Mexico 2006 UMI LAC All 100.0% 1468
Mexico 2006 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 20.7%
Mexico 2006 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 37.3%
Mexico 2006 UMI LAC Large (100+) 41.9%
Mexico 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 1470
Mexico 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 6.7%
Mexico 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 11.3%
Mexico 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 82.0%
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 68
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 30.3%
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 69.7%
Moldova 2009 LMI ECA All 100.0% 362
Moldova 2009 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 16.2%
Moldova 2009 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 35.3%
Moldova 2009 LMI ECA Large (100+) 48.5%
Moldova 2013 LMI ECA All 100.0% 357
Moldova 2013 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 28.4%
Moldova 2013 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 48.0%
Moldova 2013 LMI ECA Large (100+) 23.6%
Mongolia 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 361
Mongolia 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 11.6%
Mongolia 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 42.9%
Mongolia 2009 LMI EAP Large (100+) 45.5%
Mongolia 2013 LMI EAP All 100.0% 356
Mongolia 2013 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 18.9%
Mongolia 2013 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 46.9%
Mongolia 2013 LMI EAP Large (100+) 34.2%
Montenegro 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 113
Montenegro 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 39.3%
Montenegro 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 35.1%
Montenegro 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 25.6%
Montenegro 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 149
Montenegro 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 30.8%
Montenegro 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 29.9%
Montenegro 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 39.4%
Morocco 2013 LMI MNA All 100.0% 401
Morocco 2013 LMI MNA Small (5-19) 10.8%
Morocco 2013 LMI MNA Medium (20-99) 32.0%
Morocco 2013 LMI MNA Large (100+) 57.2%
Mozambique 2007 LI AFR All 100.0% 475
Mozambique 2007 LI AFR Small (5-19) 19.0%
Mozambique 2007 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 39.5%
Mozambique 2007 LI AFR Large (100+) 41.5%
Myanmar 2014 LMI EAP All 100.0% 628
Myanmar 2014 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 16.3%
Myanmar 2014 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 22.8%
Myanmar 2014 LMI EAP Large (100+) 60.8%
Myanmar 2016 LMI EAP All 100.0% 605
Myanmar 2016 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 20.6%
Myanmar 2016 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 18.5%
Myanmar 2016 LMI EAP Large (100+) 60.8%
Namibia 2006 LMI AFR All 100.0% 323
Namibia 2006 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 42.6%
Namibia 2006 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 45.5%
Namibia 2006 LMI AFR Large (100+) 11.8%
Namibia 2014 UMI AFR All 100.0% 557
Namibia 2014 UMI AFR Small (5-19) 40.9%
Namibia 2014 UMI AFR Medium (20-99) 49.5%
Namibia 2014 UMI AFR Large (100+) 9.6%
Nepal 2009 LI SAR All 100.0% 363
Nepal 2009 LI SAR Small (5-19) 52.4%
Nepal 2009 LI SAR Medium (20-99) 30.5%
Nepal 2009 LI SAR Large (100+) 17.1%
Nepal 2013 LI SAR All 100.0% 476
Nepal 2013 LI SAR Small (5-19) 44.1%
Nepal 2013 LI SAR Medium (20-99) 36.7%
Nepal 2013 LI SAR Large (100+) 19.2%
Nicaragua 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 470
Nicaragua 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 21.2%
Nicaragua 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 37.8%
Nicaragua 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 41.0%
Nicaragua 2010 LMI LAC All 100.0% 329
Nicaragua 2010 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 12.5%
Nicaragua 2010 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 31.3%
Nicaragua 2010 LMI LAC Large (100+) 56.3%
Nicaragua 2016 LMI LAC All 100.0% 327
Nicaragua 2016 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 29.7%
Nicaragua 2016 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 48.1%
Nicaragua 2016 LMI LAC Large (100+) 22.2%
Niger 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 149
Niger 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 41.7%
Niger 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 44.0%
Niger 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 14.3%
Niger 2017 AFR All 100.0% 149
Niger 2017 AFR Small (5-19) 17.1%
Niger 2017 AFR Medium (20-99) 24.3%
Niger 2017 AFR Large (100+) 58.6%
Nigeria 2007 LI AFR All 100.0% 1875
Nigeria 2007 LI AFR Small (5-19) 39.7%
Nigeria 2007 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 48.5%
Nigeria 2007 LI AFR Large (100+) 11.8%
Nigeria 2014 LMI AFR All 100.0% 2527
Nigeria 2014 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 43.7%
Nigeria 2014 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 40.1%
Nigeria 2014 LMI AFR Large (100+) 16.2%
Pakistan 2007 LI SAR All 100.0% 919
Pakistan 2007 LI SAR Small (5-19) 21.0%
Pakistan 2007 LI SAR Medium (20-99) 27.6%
Pakistan 2007 LI SAR Large (100+) 51.4%
Pakistan 2013 LMI SAR All 100.0% 1222
Pakistan 2013 LMI SAR Small (5-19) 4.6%
Pakistan 2013 LMI SAR Medium (20-99) 18.5%
Pakistan 2013 LMI SAR Large (100+) 76.8%
Panama 2006 UMI LAC All 100.0% 597
Panama 2006 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 15.9%
Panama 2006 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 32.0%
Panama 2006 UMI LAC Large (100+) 52.1%
Panama 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 360
Panama 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 21.6%
Panama 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 42.8%
Panama 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 35.6%
Papua New Guinea 2015 LMI EAP All 100.0% 64
Papua New Guinea 2015 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 1.4%
Papua New Guinea 2015 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 15.2%
Papua New Guinea 2015 LMI EAP Large (100+) 83.4%
Paraguay 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 603
Paraguay 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 14.6%
Paraguay 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 39.7%
Paraguay 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 45.7%
Paraguay 2010 LMI LAC All 100.0% 359
Paraguay 2010 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 8.5%
Paraguay 2010 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 33.9%
Paraguay 2010 LMI LAC Large (100+) 57.6%
Peru 2006 LMI LAC All 100.0% 626
Peru 2006 LMI LAC Small (5-19) 4.8%
Peru 2006 LMI LAC Medium (20-99) 22.5%
Peru 2006 LMI LAC Large (100+) 72.7%
Peru 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 996
Peru 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 6.9%
Peru 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 15.2%
Peru 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 77.9%
Philippines 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 1309
Philippines 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 8.4%
Philippines 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 22.8%
Philippines 2009 LMI EAP Large (100+) 68.8%
Philippines 2015 LMI EAP All 100.0% 1319
Philippines 2015 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 18.6%
Philippines 2015 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 35.9%
Philippines 2015 LMI EAP Large (100+) 45.5%
Poland 2009 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 434
Poland 2009 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 14.7%
Poland 2009 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 21.1%
Poland 2009 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 64.2%
Poland 2013 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 530
Poland 2013 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 11.4%
Poland 2013 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 28.4%
Poland 2013 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 60.2%
Romania 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 529
Romania 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 21.0%
Romania 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 30.8%
Romania 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 48.2%
Romania 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 534
Romania 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 25.7%
Romania 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 35.2%
Romania 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 39.1%
Russian Federation 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 995
Russian Federation 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 3.3%
Russian Federation 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 14.5%
Russian Federation 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 82.1%
Russian Federation 2012 HI ECA All 100.0% 4160
Russian Federation 2012 HI ECA Small (5-19) 12.3%
Russian Federation 2012 HI ECA Medium (20-99) 32.7%
Russian Federation 2012 HI ECA Large (100+) 55.0%
Rwanda 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 210
Rwanda 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 16.0%
Rwanda 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 28.2%
Rwanda 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 55.8%
Rwanda 2011 LI AFR All 100.0% 236
Rwanda 2011 LI AFR Small (5-19) 16.6%
Rwanda 2011 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 28.4%
Rwanda 2011 LI AFR Large (100+) 55.0%
Samoa 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 107
Samoa 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 26.0%
Samoa 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 45.8%
Samoa 2009 LMI EAP Large (100+) 28.2%
Senegal 2007 LI AFR All 100.0% 493
Senegal 2007 LI AFR Small (5-19) 45.4%
Senegal 2007 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 32.4%
Senegal 2007 LI AFR Large (100+) 22.3%
Senegal 2014 LMI AFR All 100.0% 590
Senegal 2014 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 14.3%
Senegal 2014 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 22.0%
Senegal 2014 LMI AFR Large (100+) 63.7%
Serbia 2009 UMI ECA All 100.0% 387
Serbia 2009 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 10.1%
Serbia 2009 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 24.8%
Serbia 2009 UMI ECA Large (100+) 65.1%
Serbia 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 358
Serbia 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 25.9%
Serbia 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 35.9%
Serbia 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 38.1%
Sierra Leone 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 147
Sierra Leone 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 49.3%
Sierra Leone 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 30.2%
Sierra Leone 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 20.5%
Slovak Republic 2009 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 267
Slovak Republic 2009 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 18.7%
Slovak Republic 2009 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 33.6%
Slovak Republic 2009 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 47.8%
Slovak Republic 2013 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 266
Slovak Republic 2013 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 15.7%
Slovak Republic 2013 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 28.9%
Slovak Republic 2013 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 55.4%
Slovenia 2009 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 273
Slovenia 2009 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 11.0%
Slovenia 2009 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 23.8%
Slovenia 2009 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 65.2%
Slovenia 2013 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 265
Slovenia 2013 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 39.3%
Slovenia 2013 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 39.6%
Slovenia 2013 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 21.1%
Solomon Islands 2015 LMI EAP All 100.0% 151
Solomon Islands 2015 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 9.0%
Solomon Islands 2015 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 34.0%
Solomon Islands 2015 LMI EAP Large (100+) 57.0%
South Africa 2007 UMI AFR All 100.0% 928
South Africa 2007 UMI AFR Small (5-19) 9.0%
South Africa 2007 UMI AFR Medium (20-99) 36.3%
South Africa 2007 UMI AFR Large (100+) 54.7%
South Sudan 2014 LI AFR All 100.0% 717
South Sudan 2014 LI AFR Small (5-19) 68.6%
South Sudan 2014 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 29.7%
South Sudan 2014 LI AFR Large (100+) 1.7%
Sri Lanka 2011 LMI SAR All 100.0% 608
Sri Lanka 2011 LMI SAR Small (5-19) 17.0%
Sri Lanka 2011 LMI SAR Medium (20-99) 19.2%
Sri Lanka 2011 LMI SAR Large (100+) 63.8%
St. Kitts and Nevis 2010 UMI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 148
St. Kitts and Nevis 2010 UMI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 24.6%
St. Kitts and Nevis 2010 UMI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 56.4%
St. Kitts and Nevis 2010 UMI HI: nonO Large (100+) 19.0%
St. Lucia 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 150
St. Lucia 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 25.6%
St. Lucia 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 39.7%
St. Lucia 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 34.7%
St. Vincent and the Grenadines UMI LAC All 100.0% 151
St. Vincent and the Grenadines UMI LAC Small (5-19) 42.4%
St. Vincent and the Grenadines UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 50.3%
St. Vincent and the Grenadines UMI LAC Large (100+) 7.3%
Sudan 2014 LMI AFR All 100.0% 656
Sudan 2014 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 22.7%
Sudan 2014 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 46.4%
Sudan 2014 LMI AFR Large (100+) 30.9%
Suriname 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 149
Suriname 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 19.7%
Suriname 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 62.2%
Suriname 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 18.0%
Swaziland 2006 LMI AFR All 100.0% 303
Swaziland 2006 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 16.2%
Swaziland 2006 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 17.7%
Swaziland 2006 LMI AFR Large (100+) 66.1%
Swaziland 2016 LMI AFR All 100.0% 149
Swaziland 2016 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 18.0%
Swaziland 2016 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 34.3%
Swaziland 2016 LMI AFR Large (100+) 47.7%
Sweden 2014 HI HI: OECDAll 100.0% 598
Sweden 2014 HI HI: OECDSmall (5-19) 10.3%
Sweden 2014 HI HI: OECDMedium (20-99) 44.0%
Sweden 2014 HI HI: OECDLarge (100+) 45.7%
Tajikistan 2008 LI ECA All 100.0% 353
Tajikistan 2008 LI ECA Small (5-19) 7.7%
Tajikistan 2008 LI ECA Medium (20-99) 28.4%
Tajikistan 2008 LI ECA Large (100+) 63.9%
Tajikistan 2013 LI ECA All 100.0% 348
Tajikistan 2013 LI ECA Small (5-19) 15.7%
Tajikistan 2013 LI ECA Medium (20-99) 46.2%
Tajikistan 2013 LI ECA Large (100+) 38.2%
Tanzania 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 413
Tanzania 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 27.8%
Tanzania 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 38.3%
Tanzania 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 33.9%
Tanzania 2013 LI AFR All 100.0% 710
Tanzania 2013 LI AFR Small (5-19) 29.1%
Tanzania 2013 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 34.4%
Tanzania 2013 LI AFR Large (100+) 36.5%
Thailand 2016 UMI EAP All 100.0% 987
Thailand 2016 UMI EAP Small (5-19) 19.5%
Thailand 2016 UMI EAP Medium (20-99) 26.1%
Thailand 2016 UMI EAP Large (100+) 54.4%
Timor-Leste 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 148
Timor-Leste 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 28.5%
Timor-Leste 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 53.8%
Timor-Leste 2009 LMI EAP Large (100+) 17.7%
Timor-Leste 2015 LMI EAP All 100.0% 123
Timor-Leste 2015 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 28.7%
Timor-Leste 2015 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 42.9%
Timor-Leste 2015 LMI EAP Large (100+) 28.4%
Togo 2009 LI AFR All 100.0% 153
Togo 2009 LI AFR Small (5-19) 43.2%
Togo 2009 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 24.6%
Togo 2009 LI AFR Large (100+) 32.2%
Togo 2016 LI AFR All 100.0% 149
Togo 2016 LI AFR Small (5-19) 8.9%
Togo 2016 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 22.9%
Togo 2016 LI AFR Large (100+) 68.1%
Tonga 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 149
Tonga 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 81.0%
Tonga 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 19.0%
Trinidad and Tobago 2010 HI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 369
Trinidad and Tobago 2010 HI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 30.9%
Trinidad and Tobago 2010 HI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 27.7%
Trinidad and Tobago 2010 HI HI: nonO Large (100+) 41.5%
Tunisia 2013 UMI MNA All 100.0% 590
Tunisia 2013 UMI MNA Small (5-19) 10.8%
Tunisia 2013 UMI MNA Medium (20-99) 27.5%
Tunisia 2013 UMI MNA Large (100+) 61.7%
Turkey 2008 UMI ECA All 100.0% 1138
Turkey 2008 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 10.1%
Turkey 2008 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 19.3%
Turkey 2008 UMI ECA Large (100+) 70.6%
Turkey 2013 UMI ECA All 100.0% 1316
Turkey 2013 UMI ECA Small (5-19) 19.7%
Turkey 2013 UMI ECA Medium (20-99) 39.7%
Turkey 2013 UMI ECA Large (100+) 40.6%
Uganda 2006 LI AFR All 100.0% 556
Uganda 2006 LI AFR Small (5-19) 26.1%
Uganda 2006 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 42.9%
Uganda 2006 LI AFR Large (100+) 30.9%
Uganda 2013 LI AFR All 100.0% 729
Uganda 2013 LI AFR Small (5-19) 42.9%
Uganda 2013 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 26.2%
Uganda 2013 LI AFR Large (100+) 30.8%
Ukraine 2008 LMI ECA All 100.0% 840
Ukraine 2008 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 11.6%
Ukraine 2008 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 27.8%
Ukraine 2008 LMI ECA Large (100+) 60.6%
Ukraine 2013 LMI ECA All 100.0% 981
Ukraine 2013 LMI ECA Small (5-19) 19.2%
Ukraine 2013 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 37.1%
Ukraine 2013 LMI ECA Large (100+) 43.7%
Uruguay 2006 UMI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 613
Uruguay 2006 UMI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 26.9%
Uruguay 2006 UMI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 40.4%
Uruguay 2006 UMI HI: nonO Large (100+) 32.6%
Uruguay 2010 UMI HI: nonOAll 100.0% 600
Uruguay 2010 UMI HI: nonO Small (5-19) 18.1%
Uruguay 2010 UMI HI: nonO Medium (20-99) 26.5%
Uruguay 2010 UMI HI: nonO Large (100+) 55.4%
Uzbekistan 2008 LI ECA All 100.0% 365
Uzbekistan 2008 LI ECA Small (5-19) 26.8%
Uzbekistan 2008 LI ECA Medium (20-99) 30.9%
Uzbekistan 2008 LI ECA Large (100+) 42.4%
Uzbekistan 2013 LMI ECA All 100.0% 390
Uzbekistan 2013 LMI ECA All 20.0%
Uzbekistan 2013 LMI ECA Medium (20-99) 29.9%
Uzbekistan 2013 LMI ECA Large (100+) 50.1%
Vanuatu 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 128
Vanuatu 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 29.0%
Vanuatu 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 64.8%
Vanuatu 2009 LMI EAP Large (100+) 6.2%
Venezuela, RB 2006 UMI LAC All 100.0% 495
Venezuela, RB 2006 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 30.6%
Venezuela, RB 2006 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 28.1%
Venezuela, RB 2006 UMI LAC Large (100+) 41.2%
Venezuela, RB 2010 UMI LAC All 100.0% 315
Venezuela, RB 2010 UMI LAC Small (5-19) 22.5%
Venezuela, RB 2010 UMI LAC Medium (20-99) 23.4%
Venezuela, RB 2010 UMI LAC Large (100+) 54.1%
Vietnam 2009 LMI EAP All 100.0% 1043
Vietnam 2009 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 5.9%
Vietnam 2009 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 19.1%
Vietnam 2009 LMI EAP Large (100+) 75.0%
Vietnam 2015 LMI EAP All 100.0% 981
Vietnam 2015 LMI EAP Small (5-19) 12.2%
Vietnam 2015 LMI EAP Medium (20-99) 25.8%
Vietnam 2015 LMI EAP Large (100+) 62.0%
West Bank and Gaza 2013 LMI MNA All 100.0% 427
West Bank and Gaza 2013 LMI MNA Small (5-19) 62.5%
West Bank and Gaza 2013 LMI MNA Medium (20-99) 32.9%
West Bank and Gaza 2013 LMI MNA Large (100+) 4.7%
Yemen, Rep. 2010 LMI MNA All 100.0% 467
Yemen, Rep. 2010 LMI MNA Small (5-19) 47.4%
Yemen, Rep. 2010 LMI MNA Medium (20-99) 23.6%
Yemen, Rep. 2010 LMI MNA Large (100+) 28.9%
Yemen, Rep. 2013 LMI MNA All 100.0% 349
Yemen, Rep. 2013 LMI MNA Small (5-19) 35.1%
Yemen, Rep. 2013 LMI MNA Medium (20-99) 18.9%
Yemen, Rep. 2013 LMI MNA Large (100+) 46.0%
Zambia 2007 LI AFR All 100.0% 481
Zambia 2007 LI AFR Small (5-19) 10.6%
Zambia 2007 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 32.7%
Zambia 2007 LI AFR Large (100+) 56.7%
Zambia 2013 LMI AFR All 100.0% 707
Zambia 2013 LMI AFR Small (5-19) 29.8%
Zambia 2013 LMI AFR Medium (20-99) 39.0%
Zambia 2013 LMI AFR Large (100+) 31.2%
Zimbabwe 2011 LI AFR All 100.0% 597
Zimbabwe 2011 LI AFR Small (5-19) 9.0%
Zimbabwe 2011 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 27.0%
Zimbabwe 2011 LI AFR Large (100+) 63.9%
Zimbabwe 2016 LI AFR All 100.0% 595
Zimbabwe 2016 LI AFR Small (5-19) 36.0%
Zimbabwe 2016 LI AFR Medium (20-99) 27.3%
Zimbabwe 2016 LI AFR Large (100+) 36.7%