Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
INTRODUCTION
1. Background
EXPLANATION
1. Language
Language is the human capacity for acquiring and using complex systems
of communication, and a language is any example of such a system of complex
communication.
According Keraf in Smarapradhipa (2005:1), providing two language
understanding. The first notion of language as stated means of communication
between members of the public in the form of a symbol of the sound produced by
means of said human. Second, language is a communication system that uses
symbols vocal (speech sound) which are arbitrary.
According to Owen in Syarif Hidayatullah, 2009, language can be defined
as a socially shared combinations of those symbol and rule governed
combinations of those symbols.
Another case in Stiawan according to Owen (2006:1), describes the
language definition language can be defined as a socially shared Those
combinations of symbols and rule governed Those combinations of symbols
(language can be defined as a socially acceptable code or conventional system for
delivering concepts through the use of symbols and combinations of the desired
symbols are governed by the provisions).
The opinions above are similar to what was expressed by Tarin (1989:4),
he gives two definitions of the language. First, language is a system that
systematically, perhaps also for generative systems. Second, language is a set of
symbols as you like it or arbitrary symbols.
According to Santoso (1990:1), language is a series of sound produced by
said means of a conscious human being. Another definition, language is a form
and not a state (language may be the form and not matter) or something that
sounds arbitrary symbol system, or also a system of many systems, a system of an
order or an order in the system the system. The expression proposed by Mackey
(1986:12).
According Wibowo (2001:3), language is a system of symbols that are
meaningful and articulate sound (generated by said tool) which are arbitrary and
conventional, which is used as a means of communicating by a group of human
beings to give birth to feelings and thoughts.
Almost similar to the opinion Wibowo, Walija (1996:4), disclose the
definition language of communication is the most complete and effective way to
convey ideas, messages, intentions, feelings and opinions to others.
Other opinions about the definition of language expressed by Shamsuddin
(1986:2), he gave two language understanding. First, language is a tool used to
shape the mind and feelings, desires and deeds, a tool used to influence and be
influenced. Second, language is a clear sign of a good personality or bad, a clear
sign of the family and the nation, a clear sign from the mind of humanity.
While Pengabean (1981:5), argues that language is a system of express
and report what happens on the nervous system.
Recent opinion of this short paper about the language expressed by
Soejono (1983:01), language is a means of spiritual communication is very
important in life together.
As with the Wikipedia, which is almost the same on the definition of
language that has been presented to the experts. And the following languages
definition according to Wikipedia.
1. a system to represent objects, actions, ideas and circumstances.
2. an apparatus which is used to convey their real concept into the minds
of
others
3. a unified system of meaning
4. a code that is used by a linguistic expert to distinguish between form
and
meaning.
5. deliver a speech grammar that have been established (eg, words,
sentences,
and others.)
6. a speech system that will be understood by the linguistic community....
A society, or a human society, is a group of people related to each other
through persistent relations, or a large social grouping sharing the same
geographical or virtual territory, subject to the same political authority and
dominant cultural expectations.
2. Society
A society is a group of people involved in persistent social interaction, or a
large social grouping sharing the same geographical or social territory, typically
subject to the same political authority and dominant cultural expectations.
Societies are characterized by patterns of relationships (social relations) between
individuals who share a distinctive culture and institutions; a given society may be
described as the sum total of such relationships among its constituent members. In
the social sciences, a larger society often evinces stratification or dominance
patterns in subgroups.
How are the language forms used by men and women different in western
societies, give examples? (just read)
In western societies, women and men whose social roles are similar do not use
forms that are completely different, but they use different quantities or frequencies
of the same form. For example: women use more standard forms than men, and
men use more vernacular forms than women / women use more ing-forms than
men and fewer ing-forms in words like coming or running. But in western
communities, such differences are also found in the speech of different social
classes, therefore the language of women in the lower and higher classes is more
similar to that of men in the same group.
Language is the primary tool for communication purposes, for establishing peace
and order in our society, for showing authority and power, and for attaining goals
and objectives. But, it can also destruct the society if it will use inappropriately. It
must follow the conformity governing the society to avoid conflict s and to meet
the boundary of individual differences.
Society however controls our language by giving us preferences as what are
acceptable and not, because each one of us has our own perception or point of
view. A group of people may accept our language, but for others, it could be kind
of offence or insult. We must know how, when and where to say it and for what
purpose.
Social changes produce changes in language. This affects values in ways that have
not been accurately understood. Language incorporates social values. However,
social values are only the same as linguistic values when the society is a stable
and unchanging one. Once society starts changing, then language change produces
special effects.
The subject is the relationship between language sociolinguistic with its use in the
community is that the relationship between the forms of a specific language,
called the language variation, variance, or dialect with its use for certain functions
in the community.
Social network
Understanding language in society means that one also has to understand the
social networks in which language is embedded. A social network is another way
of describing a particular speech community in terms of relations between
individual members in a community. A network could be loose or tight depending
on how members interact with each other. For instance, an office or factory may
be considered a tight community because all members interact with each other. A
large course with 100+ students would be a looser community because students
may only interact with the instructor and maybe 12 other students. A multiplex
community is one in which members have multiple relationships with each other.
For instance, in some neighborhoods, members may live on the same street, work
for the same employer and even intermarry.
The looseness or tightness of a social network may affect speech patterns adopted
by a speaker. For instance, Sylvie Dubois and Barbara Horvath found that
speakers in one Cajun Louisiana community were more likely to pronounce
English "th" [] as [t] (or [] as [d]) if they participated in a relatively dense social
network (i.e. had strong local ties and interacted with many other speakers in the
community), and less likely if their networks were looser (i.e. fewer local ties).
A social network may apply to the macro level of a country or a city, but also to
the inter-personal level of neighborhoods or a single family. Recently, social
networks have been formed by the Internet, through chat rooms, Facebook groups,
organizations, and online dating services.
Social roles
Language and gender research has focused on how female and males speakers
interact with one another. There is a substantial body of evidence that women and
men, girls and boys interact to some extentin different ways. The dominance of
both male and female can be seen in the several specific features of conversational
style between women and men.
The men have a great many expressions peculiar to them, which the woman
understand but never pronounce themselves. On the other hand, the women have
words and phrases which the men never use, ort hey would be laughed to scorn.
Thus it happens that in their conversations it often seems as if the women had
another language than the men.
CHAPTER III
CLOSING
1. CONCLUSION
Language is so firmly attached, fused soul in every speaker in the
community. It is like a powerful weapon to affect the state and civic
society. The function of language as a means to interact or communicate
within the meaning of tools to convey thoughts, ideas, concepts or also a
feeling in this community in the traditional language function is called.
Then it can be said the relationship between language and its users in this
society is a study sociolinguistics.
2. SUGGESTION
Each individual should speak the right language, polite, thoughtful and
ethical in language, especially when you are in the community. And let the
speakers should be able to adjust its language when it is in place, both
within the formal and non-formal environment.