Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IUCrJ
ISSN 2052-2525
Binary and ternary cocrystals of sulfa drug
acetazolamide with pyridine carboxamides
and cyclic amides
CHEMISTRY j CRYSTENG
School of Chemistry, University of Hyderabad, Prof. C. R. Rao Road, Central University PO, Hyderabad 500 046, India.
Received 18 November 2015 *Correspondence e-mail: ashwini.nangia@gmail.com
Accepted 11 January 2016
1. Introduction
Hydrogen bonding is the key adhesive to construct supra-
molecular synthons for the design of crystalline architectures
by using multiple functional groups (Desiraju, 1995). From a
crystal engineering perspective, binary and ternary adducts
are formed due to robust heterosynthons in the cocrystal,
compared with homosynthons in the constituent molecules
(Walsh et al., 2003). It has been shown over more than a
decade that crystal engineering of multi-component phases
offers rational approaches to systematically tune the physi-
cochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of active phar-
maceutical ingredients (APIs, Fig. 1). The matching of
functional groups and supramolecular synthons together with
size and shape factors of molecules offers an approach to
assemble three different molecules in the same crystal lattice
(Tothadi & Desiraju, 2013, 2014; Chakraborty et al., 2014;
Aakeroy et al., 2001, 2005; Seaton et al., 2013; Aitipamula et al.,
2013). Ternary cocrystals are relatively less studied and the
sulfonamide group is a structural gap, even as SO2NH2 is the
key functional group in the most populated sulfa drugs cate-
gory. These considerations encouraged us to systematically
study binary and ternary cocrystals of the sulfonamide group
(Bolla et al., 2015). The assembly of three different molecular
components in the same crystal lattice is challenging because it
hinges on a balance of intermolecular interaction strengths,
chemical recognition, geometric fit and overall shape
complementarity (Tothadi & Desiraju, 2013). There is more
than one possible outcome of a three-component cocrystalli-
Figure 2
Figure 1 Chemical structures of ACZ as A, coformers pyridine carboxamides and
Multiple possibilities of solid forms during cocrystallization to give single, syn-amides, aromatic COOH compounds as B and C used in
binary and ternary products. cocrystallization.
IUCrJ (2016). 3, 152160 Bolla and Nangia Cocrystals of sulfa drug acetazolamide 153
research papers
Table 1
Crystallographic parameters of cocrystals.
ACZNAM ACZVLM ACZCPR ACZ2HP ACZ2HP ACZMeHP ACZOMeHP ACZNAM
(1:1) (1:2) hydrate (1:1:1) (1:2) (1:1) (1:1) hydrate (1:1:1) 2HP (1:1:1)
154 Bolla and Nangia Cocrystals of sulfa drug acetazolamide IUCrJ (2016). 3, 152160
research papers
2.8. ACZNAM2HP (1:1:1) 2.9. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction
ACZ (100 mg, 0.45 mmol), NAM (54 mg, 0.45 mmol) A single crystal was mounted on the goniometer of an
and 2HP (42 mg, 0.45 mmol) were ground well in a mortar Oxford Diffraction Gemini X-ray diffractometer equipped
and pestle for 2030 min by adding 47 drops of EtOAc. with Cu K radiation source ( = 1.54184 A) at 298 K. Data
The ground material was kept for crystallization from a reduction was performed using CrysAlisPro 171.33.55 soft-
solvent mixture of 5 ml EtOAc and THF as well as the indi- ware (Oxford Diffraction, 2008). The crystal structure was
vidual solvents at room temperature to give good quality solved and refined using Olex2-1.0 (Dolomanov et al., 2009)
single crystals of the ternary adduct after 56 days. A few with anisotropic displacement parameters for non-H atoms. H
crystals of binary products ACZNAM and ACZ2HP (1:1, atoms were experimentally located through the difference-
1:2) were also observed in the crystallization flask concomi- Fourier electron density maps in all crystal structures. Data
tantly based on a unit cell check. Single crystal data were were reduced by SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1998) and further
collected of the ternary product by manual separation of their continued with SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008). A check of the
different morphology crystals as a plate and a block; m.p. final CIF file with PLATON (Spek, 2009) did not show any
125 C. missed symmetry. X-Seed (Barbour, 2001) was used to prepare
the figures and packing diagrams.
The crystallographic parameters of
all the cocrystals are summarized in
Table 1 and hydrogen-bond
distances are listed in Table S1. CIF
files are deposited at CCDC Nos.
14369781436985. Single-crystal X-
ray diffraction data were also
collected at 298 K on a Bruker
SMART APEX-1 CCD area-
detector system equipped with a
graphite monochromator Mo K
fine-focus sealed tube ( =
0.71073 A) operating at 1500
power, 40 kV, 30 mA. The frames
were integrated by SAINT
(Bruker, 1998) software using a
narrow-frame integration algo-
rithm. Data were corrected for
absorption effects using the multi-
scan method (SADABS; Bruker,
1998). The structures were solved
and refined using SHELXTL
(Sheldrick, 2008).
IUCrJ (2016). 3, 152160 Bolla and Nangia Cocrystals of sulfa drug acetazolamide 155
research papers
group, thiadiazole heterocycle and acetamide groups. Both the the self-association to give stronger and newer motifs in the
sulfonamide and acetamido groups are sites for hydrogen binary complexes. This is a positive indication for successful
bonding with complementary coformers listed under B and C. cocrystallization.
Crystal structures of two polymorphs (I) and (II) of ACZ are The crystal structures and supramolecular synthons of
reported (Umeda et al., 1985). Form (I) exhibits multiple ring binary systems with a few pharmaceutically acceptable
synthons such as NH N homodimers R22 8, sulfonamide coformers are discussed to understand the hydrogen bonding
dimer R22 8, sulfonamideamide macrocycle ring R22 20 (Fig. and stoichiometry in self-assembly: ACZNAM (1:1), ACZ
3a) (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995). Form (II) comprises VLM (1:2), ACZCPR hydrate (1:1:1), ACZ2HP (1:1 and
sulfonamide catemer chains C(4) as well as amidethiadiazole 1:2), ACZMeHP (1:1) ACZOMeHP hydrate (1:1:1). The
NH N ring motif R22 8 (Fig. 3b). The hydrogen-bond designed assembly of a ternary cocrystal ACZNAM2HP
motifs present in the reported cocrystals of ACZ (Baraldi et (1:1:1) is as such rare for drug molecules.
al., 2009; Arenas-Garca et al., 2010, 2012; Ferrer et al., 1989,
1990; Hartmann & Vahrenkamp, 1991) with 4-hydroxybenzoic
acid (ACZ4HBA; 1:1), a hydrate with nicotinamide (ACZ 3.2. Crystal structures of binary cocrystals
NAM hydrate; 1:1:1), picolinamide (ACZPAM; 1:2) and 2,3- The crystal structure parameters are summarized in Table 1
dihydroxy benzoic acid (ACZ2,3DHBA; 3:1) are displayed in and hydrogen-bond parameters in Table S1 of the supporting
Figs. 3(c)(f). The fact that the synthons in cocrystal structures information. The synthons and molecular packing of binary
are quite different from those in the two polymorphs of ACZ cocrystals is presented first and then the build up to the
means that the coformer functional groups are able to disrupt ternary system is described.
Figure 4
Supramolecular synthons and molecular packing in ACZ binary systems. (a), (b) ACZNAM (1:1) displays ACZ sulfonamide NH O and NH N
hydrogen bonds with NAM amide dimers and pyridine N motifs. (c), (d) ACZVLM (1:2) where one VLM forms a hydrogen bond with the
amidediazoleamide synthon and the second VLM connects such heterodimer units. (e), (f) CPR homodimers interact with sulfonamide hydrate dimer
motifs via NH O and OH O hydrogen bonds. (g), (h) ACZ2HP (1:2) shows one equivalent of 2HP to make the heterodimer which is connected
by the second 2HP homodimers and sulfonamide NH O chain. (i), (j) Two-dimensional packing in ACZ2HP (1:1) makes the binary heterosynthon
similar to the previous structure as well as the sulfonamide C(4) catemer. (k), (l) ACZMeHP (1:1) is similar to that of ACZ2HP (1:1). (m), (n) Water
molecules are present in the crystal lattice of ACZOMeHP hydrate (1:1:1) which connect the binary components of aminodiazoleamide. H atoms are
removed in a few diagrams for clarity.
156 Bolla and Nangia Cocrystals of sulfa drug acetazolamide IUCrJ (2016). 3, 152160
research papers
3.2.1. ACZNAM (1:1). The cocrystal structure (space diazole R22 8 motif (Fig. 4i), similar to the previous structure.
group P1) contains NH N homodimers R22 8of ACZ, The extended motifs via NH O catemer chain C(4) in this
similar to those observed in polymorph (II). However, the structure (Fig. 4j) obviate the need for the 2HP dimer noted in
sulfonamide dimer of ACZ is replaced by NH O and N the 1:2 structure (Fig. 4g). This binary structure suggests that
H N hydrogen bonds to nicotinamide. Two ACZ and two 2HP should be a good partner for ternary assembly because
NAM molecules form a tetramer ring motif R44 16 via N the crystal structure is heavily disturbed compared with the
H O and NH N hydrogen bonds (Fig. 4a). The overall ACZ structure, as well as other cocrystals. Moreover, both 1:1
structure has a layered two-dimensional pattern (Fig. 4b). and 1:2 combinations were routinely observed. A strong
3.2.2. ACZVLM (1:2). In the crystal structure (P21/c) VLM heterodimer between the two components is a prerequisite for
forms a R22 9 motif of sulfonamide, thiadiazole and amide ternary assembly (Aakeroy et al., 2001; Aakeroy & Salmon,
groups (Fig. 4c). A second equivalent of VLM connects such 2005). The presence of the symmetry-independent 2HP dimer
heterosynthon units via NH O hydrogen bonds. Such one- in the 1:2 structure appears to be optional and it could be
dimensional chains extended parallel to the c-axis via N replaced by another component of similar size, shape and
H O hydrogen bonds in a two-dimensional array (Fig. 4d). hydrogen-bonding groups to yield a ternary cocrystal. We note
The inclusion of a second VLM in the cocrystal structure that there is a similar NAM amide dimer in the ACZNAM
suggested that if this latter molecule could be replaced by a (1:1) structure (Fig. 4a) and this gives a logical lead towards
different amide, then a ternary system will result. In other the ternary combination.
words, the binary system has a tendency to include a third 3.2.6. ACZMeHP (1:1). The centrosymmetric R22 8 dimers
partner from solution. The same phenomenon is observed in of ACZMeHP are formed with NH O and NH N
the next structure. bonds between aminodiazoleamide groups (Fig. 4k), which is
3.2.3. ACZCPR hydrate (1:1:1). The ground material of similar to the heterosynthon in ACZ2HP. The sulfonamide
ACZ and CPR in a 1:1 ratio was crystallized as a hydrate NH donors connect molecules to make extended arrays
(1:1:1) in space group P1. CPR homodimers R22 8 are sand- (Fig. 4l).
wiched between the SO2NH2 and water molecules in a R44 12 3.2.7. ACZOMeHP hydrate (1:1:1). The ground product
ring motif (Fig. 4e). Such discrete clusters extend via the water of ACZ and OMeHP in a 1:1 ratio crystallized as a hydrate
OH donor (Fig. 4f). Even though the water is serendipi- (1:1:1) in space group P1. The dimer of ACZ diazole and
tously included, it makes three components in the crystal OMeHP amide in ring motif R22 8 (Fig. 3a) and water mole-
lattice. cules connect such units (Fig. 4m) in the inter-layer region
3.2.4. ACZ2HP (1:2). The ground product of ACZ2HP (Fig. 4n). It appears that the inclusion of water was mandated
(1:2) was solved in space group P1. One equivalent of 2HP as a spacer between the ACZOMeHP dimer units to
breaks the strong NH N homodimer R22 8 between ACZ accommodate the OMe group. This means that the bonding
molecules and forms an amide(2HP)imino (ACZ) hetero- between ACZ and 2HP is strong enough to override steric
synthon. The sulfonamidecarboxamide dimer motif R22 20 groups which were overcome by the inclusion of a water
previously noted in ACZ Form (I) (Fig. 3a) is present in this molecule in the binary cocrystal.
binary system (Fig. 4g). The second equivalent of 2HP The above crystal structures are described in the natural
homodimers connect ACZ2HP units via NH O sequence of crystallization being carried out and the experi-
hydrogen bonds to give the 1:2 composition (Fig. 4h). Again, mental results analyzed.
the 2HP dimers could be replaced by a structural mimic to give
a ternary system.
3.2.5. ACZ2HP (1:1). The cyclic ring motifs, such as the 3.3. Crystal structure of ternary cocrystal ACZNAM2HP
NH N dimer of ACZ polymorphs (Figs. 3a and b), are (1:1:1)
interrupted in the presence of 2HP to give an amideimino- After screening several binary combinations and their
crystal structures, we have decided
to replace the second equivalent of
the coformer in ACZ2HP (1:2)
with NAM, given that nicotinamide
can form an amide R22 8 dimer
similar to 2HP. Moreover such
dimers are present in ACZNAM
(1:1). Grinding of ACZ, NAM and
2HP in an equimolar ratio and
recrystallization of the crystalline
product gave the ternary cocrystal
Figure 5 ACZNAM2HP, as confirmed by
(a) Synthons in ternary cocrystal ACZNAM2HP (1:1:1). The macrocycle ring motif R22 20 of ACZ are
single-crystal X-ray diffraction
novel to the ternary structure and NAM further extends these units with hydrogen bonding to the dimers
of 2HP. (b) Two-dimensional packing of the ternary cocrystal shows that ACZ molecules (green) are (1:1:1 stoichiometry). The ternary
separated by NAM and 2HP (blue, red). cocrystal structure has resem-
IUCrJ (2016). 3, 152160 Bolla and Nangia Cocrystals of sulfa drug acetazolamide 157
research papers
Figure 6
Hydrogen-bonding synthons of ACZ observed in this study. (a) Molecular diagram showing the hydrogen bonding groups as rigid or flexible (according
to Arenas-Garca et al., 2010, 2012). (b) Synthon 1 between the acetamide and thiadiazole ring of ACZ with carboxylic acid, carboxamide, syn-amide,
respectively. (c) Synthon 2 between the sulfonamide group of ACZ and pyridine carboxamides, e.g. NAM, PAM, to give large ring motifs. (d) Synthon 3
connects sulfonamide, thiadiazole N and lactam conformer C. The graph-set notations of ring motifs are given for identification.
blances with the binary structure ACZ2HP (1:2) as expected. groups for hydrogen bonding. The main synthons observed in
Hydrogen bonds between the sulfonamide NH and acetamide different cocrystals are displayed in Figs. 6(b)(d).
C O groups of ACZ result in dimer pairs R22 20 (Fig. 5a), The main stream of our approach and objective was to
which were noted previously in polymorph (I) of ACZ as well understand the long-range synthon Aufbau modules (LSAM;
as in ACZ2HP (1:2). The R22 8 dimers of 2HP are also Ganguly & Desiraju, 2010; Mukherjee et al., 2014a,b) in the
present here. The link between these ring motifs is that the ternary cocrystals (Bolla & Nangia, 2015). However, because
amide NH of ACZ bonds to the pyridine N of NAM and the we were successful in crystallizing only a single ternary
NH of NAM is bonded to the 2HP amide dimer. Thus, while structure in this family, a supramolecular build-up or LSAM
the A and C dimers are repeating motifs, the linkage through model for the ternary assembly of ACZ is difficult to analyze
the B molecule is somewhat different in the ternary structure due to insufficient data. The ternary cocrystal suggests the
compared with the previous binary cocrystals. Propagation of ACZ amide bonds with NAM pyridine via NH N and the
the centrosymmetric motifs via NH O and NH N
hydrogen bonds is shown in Fig. 5(b). There is considerable
carry over of synthons from the binary to the ternary
cocrystal, yet there are unexpected motifs as well. Overall, the
element of design and crystal engineering appears to be a
consistent thread in this family of structures.
158 Bolla and Nangia Cocrystals of sulfa drug acetazolamide IUCrJ (2016). 3, 152160
research papers
Table 2 than to a pyridine (six times) due to the stronger amide
Frequency of sulfonamide synthons in the CSD. acceptor nature.
Supramolecular synthons of SO2NH2 group
in crystal structure adducts Number of hits
Sulfonamideamide 25 4. Conclusions
Sulfonamidepyridine 4
Sulfonamideacid 3 The first study of sulfonamide drug cocrystals with amide
coformers is described leading to a ternary drug cocrystal. A
library of supramolecular synthons was derived from binary
adducts of ACZ with pyridine amide and lactam coformers
CONH2 donor of NAM connects to the pyridone via N
(AB and AC cocrystals). There is competition and interplay
H O to give the ternary adduct (Fig. 7).
of the hydrogen bonding functional groups during binary
cocrystallization. The binary results suggest that the syn
3.5. CSD analysis of heterosynthons in this study amides form reliable synthons to afford cocrystals with a
sulfonamide drug. Using ACZNAM and ACZ2HP cocrys-
A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD tals as leads, a ternary assembly was designed to give the 3-
Version 5.36, May 2015 update) was carried out to tabulate the component cocrystal ACZNAM2HP (1:1:1). Mechan-
reported supramolecular synthons of the sulfonamide func- ochemistry, or grinding with solvent added, is necessary to
tional group observed in this study (after eliminating hydrates, hydrogen bond the components in the ternary adduct, which
solvates, salts and duplicates) with those reported in previous was then recrystallized to produce single crystals for X-ray
structures. Relatively few hits are obtained on the sulfonamide diffraction. This is the first crystal structure report of a sulfa
functional group bonding to amide (25 hits), pyridine (4 hits) drug ternary cocrystal.
and carboxylic acids (3 hits); see Table 2 and Table S2. The
present study therefore is an early result on cocrystals of a
sulfonamide drug with pyridine amide and lactam conformers Acknowledgements
(GRAS-type molecules; Bolla & Nangia, 2015). The synthons GB thanks the UGC for a fellowship. We thank the JC Bose
extracted from the CSD for a sulfonamide bonding to an Fellowship (SR/S2/JCB-06/2009), CSIR project on Pharma-
amide or pyridine group are displayed in Fig. 8. Analogous to ceutical polymorphs and cocrystals [02(0223)/15/EMR-II], and
the carboxamide group (Nangia, 2010), the occurrence of SERB scheme on multi-component cocrystals (EMR/2015/
SO2NH2 bonding with an amide group is much more likely 002075) for funding. UGC and DST (UPE and PURSE
Figure 8
Different types of (a) sulfonamideamide, (b) sulfonamidepyridine and (c) sulfonamideacid supramolecular synthons.
IUCrJ (2016). 3, 152160 Bolla and Nangia Cocrystals of sulfa drug acetazolamide 159
research papers
programs) are thanked for providing instrumentation and Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. &
infrastructure facilities. Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339341.
Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120126.
Ferrer, S., Borras, J., Miratvilles, C. & Fuertes, A. (1990). Inorg. Chem.
References 29, 206210.
Aakeroy, C. B., Beatty, A. M. & Helfrich, B. A. (2001). Angew. Chem. Ferrer, S., Borris, J., Miratvilles, C. & Fuertes, A. (1989). Inorg. Chem.
Int. Ed. 40, 32403242. 28, 163165.
Aakeroy, C. B., Desper, J. & Urbina, J. (2005). Chem. Commun. pp. Ganguly, P. & Desiraju, G. R. (2010). CrystEngComm, 12, 817833.
28202822. Granero, G. E., Longhi, M. R., Becker, C., Junginger, H. E., Kopp, S.,
Aakeroy, C. B. & Salmon, D. (2005). CrystEngComm, 7, 439448. Midha, K. K., Shah, V. P., Stavchansky, S., Dressman, J. B. &
Aitipamula, S., Wong, A. B. H., Chow, P. S. & Tan, R. B. H. (2013). Barends, D. M. (2008). J. Pharm. Sci. 97, 36913699.
CrystEngComm, 15, 58775887. Grecu, T., Hunter, C., Gardiner, E. & McCabe, J. (2014). Cryst.
Arenas-Garca, J. I., Herrera-Ruiz, D., Mondragon-Vasquez, K., Growth Des. 14, 165171.
Morales-Rojas, H. & Hopfl, H. (2010). Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 3732 Hartmann, U. & Vahrenkamp, H. (1991). Inorg. Chem. 30, 46764677.
3742. Mukherjee, A., Dixit, K., Sarma, S. P. & Desiraju, G. R. (2014a).
Arenas-Garca, J., Herrera-Ruiz, D., Mondragon-Vasquez, K., IUCrJ, 1, 228239.
Morales-Rojas, H. & Hopfl, H. (2012). Cryst. Growth Des. 12, Mukherjee, A., Tothadi, S. & Desiraju, G. R. (2014b). Acc. Chem. Res.
811824. 47, 25142524.
Baraldi, C., Gamberini, M., Tinti, A., Palazzoli, F. & Ferioli, V. (2009). Nangia, A. (2010). J. Chem. Sci. 122, 295310.
J. Mol. Struct. 918, 8896. Oxford Diffraction (2008). CrysAlisPro. Oxford Diffraction Ltd,
Barbour, L. J. (2001). J. Supramol. Chem. 1, 189191. Yarnton, Oxfordshire UK.
Benet, L. Z. (2010). Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 106, 162167. Seaton, C., Blagden, N., Munshi, T. & Scowen, I. (2013). Chem. Eur. J.
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N. L. (1995). Angew. 19, 1066310671.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 15551573. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112122.
Bolla, G., Mittapalli, S. & Nangia, A. (2014). CrystEngComm, 16, 24 Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148155.
27. Tothadi, S. & Desiraju, G. R. (2013). Chem. Commun. 49, 77917793.
Bolla, G., Mittapalli, S. & Nangia, A. (2015). IUCrJ, 2, 389401. Tothadi, S. & Desiraju, G. (2014). Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 25142524.
Bolla, G. & Nangia, A. (2015). Chem. Commun. 51, 1557815581. Umeda, T., Ohnishi, N., Yokoyama, T., Kuroda, T., Kita, Y., Kuroda,
Bruker (1998). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS K., Tatsumi, E. & Matsuda, Y. (1985). Chem. Pharm. Bull. 33, 3422
Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 3428.
Chakraborty, S., Rajput, L. & Desiraju, G. R. (2014). Cryst. Growth Walsh, R. D. B., Bradner, M. W., Fleischman, S., Morales, L. A.,
Des. 14, 25712577. Moulton, B., Rodrguez-Hornedo, N. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2003).
Desiraju, G. R. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 23112327. Chem. Commun. pp. 186187.
160 Bolla and Nangia Cocrystals of sulfa drug acetazolamide IUCrJ (2016). 3, 152160