Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Eurocodes
Background and Applications
Dissemination of information for training
18-20 February 2008, Brussels
Eurocode 4
Composite Columns
1
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Contents Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Part 1: Introduction
Part 2: General method of design
Part 3: Plastic resistance of cross-sections and interaction curve
Part 4: Simplified design method
Part 5: Special aspects of columns with inner core profiles
Part 6: Load introduction and longitudinal shear
2
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Part 1: Introduction
3
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Composite columns Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
concrete encased
sections
concrete
filled hollow
sections
partially concrete
encased sections
4
G. Hanswille
Concrete encased sections Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
advantages:
high bearing resistance
high fire resistance
economical solution with regard to
material costs
disadvantages:
high costs for formwork
difficult solutions for connections
with beams
5
G. Hanswille
Partially concrete encased sections Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
advantages:
high bearing resistance, especially in case
of welded steel sections
no formwork
simple solution for joints and load
introduction
easy solution for later strengthening and
additional later joints
no edge protection
disadvantages:
lower fire resistance in comparison with
concrete encased sections.
6
G. Hanswille
Concrete filled hollow sections Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
advantages:
high resistance and slender columns
advantages in case of biaxial bending
no edge protection
disadvantages :
high material costs for profiles
difficult casting
additional reinforcement is needed for fire
resistance
7
G. Hanswille
Concrete filled hollow sections with Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
additional inner profiles Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
advantages:
extreme high bearing resistance in
combination with slender columns
constant cross section for all stories is
possible in high rise buildings
high fire resistance and no additional
reinforcement
no edge protection
disadvantages:
high material costs
difficult casting
8
G. Hanswille
Composite columns with hollow sections Institute Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
for Steel and
and additional inner core-profiles Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Commerzbank
Frankfurt
9
G. Hanswille
Design of composite columns Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
according to EN 1994-1-1 Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
General method
Simplified method
Introduction of loads
10
G. Hanswille
Methods of verification in accordance Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
with EN 1994-1-1 Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Methods of verification
general method:
simplified method:
double-symmetric cross-section
uniform cross-section over the member length
limited steel contribution factor
related Slenderness smaller than 2,0
limited reinforcement ratio
limitation of b/t-values
11
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Resistance to lokal buckling Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
bc
concrete encased cross-sections cy b cy
cz
40 mm
Verification is not necessary where cz
b/6 hc
h
y
cz
concrete filled hollow section
z
t
d d t
max = 90 2 d max = 52
t d
t
fyk,o d
= max = 44
fyk t
t
fyk,o = 235 N/mm2
b
12
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Part 2:
General design method
13
G. Hanswille
General method Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
c
F e fcm
0,4 fc concrete
Ecm
c
w fct c1 c1u
cracked concrete s
fy ftm
plastic zones in structural steel
fsm
-
reinforcement
Es
+
fs - s
stresses in structural steel section
fc a Ev
fu
- - - - - fy
-
+
- Ea structural
steel
stresses in concrete and reinforcement
a
v
15
G. Hanswille
Typical load-deformation behaviour of Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
composite columns in tests Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
F [kN] e
A concrete encased section and
bending about the strong axis:
1600 F Failure due to exceeding the
e=100mm
ultimate strain in concrete, buckling
A of longitudinal reinforcement and
w spalling of concrete.
1200
e=160mm
B concrete encased section and
B
bending about the weak axis :
800 Failure due to exceeding the
F
ultimate strain in concrete.
c fcm s a
ftm fu
Ev
fsm fy
0,4 fc Ecm concrete
reinforcement Ea structural
Es
s
c1 c1u c v
a
steel
fct
u : amplification factor for ultimate
system capacity Rpl,m
R =
Rpl,d
Verification u R
N
E geometrical Residual
Imperfection stresses
u Ed
Rpl,m e +-
Ed
+
Rpl,d
NEd -
Ed wo=L/1000 wo
M -
wu w +
MEd 17
G. Hanswille
Composite columns for the Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
central station in Berlin Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
800
t=25mm 550
S235
t=50mm
1200
700
S355
buckling curve a
1,0
buckling curve b
buckling curve c
Residual stresses
Part IV-3:
Plastic resistance of cross-sections and
interaction curve
19
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Resistance of cross-sections Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
fyd fcd
fsd
Npla,Rd Nplc,Rd Npls,Rd
y
20
G. Hanswille
Confinement effects in case of concrete Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
filled tubes Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
fck ,c concrete
structural steel fck
a2,Rd + a2, a,Rd a2, = fyd
2
fck,c
c,r 1=1,125
2.0 2= 2,5
a,Rd = a fyd 1=1,00
1.5 2= 5,0
fck ,c = 1 fck + 2 c ,r c ,r
0.5
fck
a a 0
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35
t d d-2t
For concrete stresses c>o,8 fck the Poissons ratio of concrete is higher than the
Poissons ratio of structural steel. The confinement of the circular tube causes radial
compressive stresses c,r. This leads to an increased strength and higher ultimate
strains of the concrete. In addition the radial stresses cause friction in the interface
between the steel tube and the concrete and therefore to an increase of the
longitudinal shear resistance.
21
G. Hanswille
Confinement effect acc. to Eurocode 4-1-1 Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
z MEd
e=
Basic values for stocky columns ao = 0,25 co = 4,9 NEd
centrically loaded: MEd
NEd
influence of a, = ao + 0,5 K 1,0
slenderness for
0,5 c, = co 18,5 K (1 0,92 K ) 0
fc
influence of load e e
eccentricity : a = a, + 10 (1 ao ) c = c, 1 10
d d fy
e/d>0,1 : a=1,0 and c=0
22
G. Hanswille
Plastic resistance to combined bending and Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
compression Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
24
G. Hanswille
Determination of the resistance to normal Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
forces and bending (example) Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Mpl,N,Rd = Nc zc + Naw,c zaw,c + Naw,t zaw,t + Naf (hw + t f ) + 2 Ns zs Nc = (b t w ) zpl 0,85 fcd
Ns = 2A s fsd
25
G. Hanswille
Simplified determination of the interaction curve Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
26
G. Hanswille
Resistance at points A and D Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
(h 2t )2 t
Mmax, Rd = Mpla ,Rd + Mpls ,Rd + 1 2 Mplc ,Rd Mpla,Rd = Wpl,a f yd = f w + b t (h t )
f f f yd
4
At point B is no resistance to
- 0,85fcd 0,85fcd - 0,85
compression forces. Therefore
+ hn fcd
the resistance to compression
forces at point D results from the
additional cross-section zones in
fsd + + + compression. With ND,Rd the
2 fsd - depth hn and the position of the
hn plastic neutral axis at point B can
+ = + be determined. With the plastic
fsd bending moment M
n,Rd resulting
from the stress blocks within the
+ + + depth hn the plastic resistance
- moment Mpl,Rd at point B can be
- + hn calculated by:
fyd + 2fyd fyd +
Mpl,Rd = MD,Rd Mp ln,Rd
Point D
ND,Rd Mpln,Rd zpl
zpl + hn = Mpl,Rd
hn
MD,Rd ND,Rd Point B
28
G. Hanswille
Plastic resistance moment at Point C Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Point B Point C
zpl Mc,Rd
+ 2hn = 2hn
Nc,Rd
hn Mpl,Rd NC,Rd
29
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Part 4:
Simplified design method
30
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Simplified Method Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Resistance
of member Design based on second order
in combined analysis with equivalent geometrical wo
compression bow imperfections
and bending
31
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Scope of the simplified method Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
A
0,3 % s 6,0 % s = s
Ac
e
Load
F [kN] F The horizontal deflection and
Fu = 2022 kN the second order bending
short term test
2000 moments increase under
L = 800 cm
wt
Fu = 1697 kN permanent loads due to creep of
wo concrete. This leads to a
1500 long term test reduction of the ultimate load.
30 cm
1000
The effects of creep of
30 cm
0
20 40 60 80 100
deflection w [mm]
33
G. Hanswille
Effects of creep on the flexural stiffness Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
h h
t,eff = 0,25 (t,to)
U = 2 (b + h) U 2 h + 0,5b
34
G. Hanswille
Verification for axial compression with the Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
European buckling curves Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
NRd
buckling
=
cross-section Npl,Rd a
curve
1,0
buckling about b 0,8
strong axis Npl,Rk
= 2,0
= 0,85 0,6 Ncr
buckling about c
weak axis 0,4 b
= 0,85 Npl,k
a 0,2
c =
s 3% = 1,00 Ncr
0,2 0,6 1,0 1,4 1,8
3% < s 6 % b NEd
= 1,00 Verification: 1,0
NRd
= 1,00 b
Design value of NRd = Npl,Rd
resistance
b Npl,Rd = A a fyd + A s fsd + A c fcd
= 0,85
35
G. Hanswille
Relative slenderness Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
36
G. Hanswille
Verification for combined Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
compression and bending Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
N wo equivalent Verification
Npl,Rd
geometrical bow
imperfection max MEd MRd = M Mpl,Rd
NEd M= 0,9 for S235 and S355
wo
M= 0,8 for S420 and S460
M Mpl,Rd
bending moments taking into
Mpl,N,Rd
M account second order effects:
1
MRd Mpl,Rd max MEd = NEd w o
N
1 Ed
fyd 0,85fcd Ncr
Mpl,N Rd
2 (E J)eff ,II
- - NEd Ncr =
2L2
(1-) fyd +
Effective flexural stiffness
fsd VEd
The factor M takes into account the (EI)eff ,II = K o (EaJa + K e Ec,eff Jc + Es Js )
difference between the full plastic and the
elasto-plastic resistance of the cross-section with K e,II = 0,5 K o = 0,9
resulting from strain limitations for concrete. 37
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Equivalent initial bow imperfections Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Buckling curve
a b c
3% < s 6%
s 3%
Member imperfection
wo= L/300 wo= L/200 wo= L/150
38
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Imperfections for global analysis of frames Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
NEd,1 NEd,2
= o m h
2 2
h = but h 1,0
h 3
m reduction factor for the number of columns in a row
equivalent forces
1
NEd,1 NEd,1 NEd,2
NEd,2 m = 0,5 1+
m
m is the number of columns in a row including only
those columns which carry a vertical load NEd not
NEd,1 NEd,2 less than 50% of the average value of the column
in a vertical plane considered.
39
G. Hanswille
Frames sensitive against second order effects Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Npl,Rk w0 Npl,Rk
0,5 0,5
NEd,1 NEd,i
NEd,1
w Npl,Rk
NEd,2
4 o NEd,2 =
L2 Ncr
NEd,1 1 NEd,2 2
2 (EJ)eff
equivalent
q=8
wo
NEd,2 Ncr =
forces L22 L2i
NEd,1 1
NEd,2 2 w (EJ)eff = (EaJa + 0,6 Ec,eff Jc + EsJs )
4 o NEd,2
L2 40
G. Hanswille
Second order analysis Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
41
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Simplified calculation of second order effects Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
k Exact solution:
r=1,0
r MR N
4,0
r MR 1+ c 2
r=0,5 Mmax = 0,5 MR ( 1 + r )
cos(0,5 )
r 1 1
r=0 c=
3,0 EJ 1 + r tan (0,5 )
r= - 0,5
L M Mmax arctan c NEd
M = 0,5 + = L
(E J)eff ,II
2,0
simplified solution:
MR
1,0
MR Mmax = 0,66 + 0,44 r
exact method k= =
MR 1 NEd
simplified method
Ncr 0,44
N
0,25 0,50 0,75 1,00 Ncr
42
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Background of the member imperfections Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Bending resistance:
M
MRd Mpl,Rd MRd = M Mpl,Rd
NRd ( )
j =
NRd ( w o ) 1 C20/S235
500
1,2 2 C40/S355
1
2 3
400 1 3 C60/S355
1,1
2 1,0
300
0,9
L 3 wo= l/300
j=
200 wo 0,8
1,0 2,0
0,4 0,8 1,2 1,6 2,0
The initial bow imperfection is a The use of constant values for wo leads to
function of the related slenderness maximum differences of 5% in
and the resistance of cross-sections. comparison with the calculation based on
In Eurocode 4 constant values for w0 the European buckling curves.
are used.
44
Comparison of the simplified method with non- G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
linear calculations for combined compression Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
and bending University of Wuppertal-Germany
N
Npl,Rd Resistance as a function of the
related slenderness
k = 0,50
1,0
Plastic cross-section
resistance
k = 1,00
Npl,Rk
0,8 = k = 1,50
Ncr
k = 2,00
0,6
M
Mpl,Rd
0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
45
G. Hanswille
Resistance to combined compression Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
and biaxial bending Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
46
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Verification in case of compression an biaxial Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
bending University of Wuppertal-Germany
N
For both axis a separate verification Npl,Rd
is necessary.
NEd
My,Ed Mz,Ed Npl,Rd dy
M M
dy Mpl,y,Rd dz Mpl,y,Rd
My,Rd
Verification for the interaction of biaxial Mpl,y,Rd
bending.
N
My,Ed Mz,Ed Npl,Rd
+ 1,0
dy Mpl,y,Rd dz Mpl,y,Rd
NEd
Npl,Rd dz
Imperfections should be considered
only in the plane in which failure is Mz,Rd
expected to occur. If it is not evident Mpl,z,Rd
which plane is the most critical,
checks should be made for both M= 0,9 for S235 and S355
planes. M= 0,8 for S420 and S460
47
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Part 5:
Special aspects of columns with inner core profiles
48
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Composite columns General Method Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Commerzbank Frankfurt
49
G. Hanswille
Composite columns with concrete filled Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
tubes and steel cores special effects Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
r
50
G. Hanswille
Residual stresses and distribution of the Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
yield strength Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
50
U/A [1/m]
10 20 30 40 50
dK [mm] residual stresses:
ED
400 200 130 100 80
2r2
E (r ) = ED 1
rK
2
dK d
r, rk
51
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
General method Finite Element Model Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
52
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Part 6:
Load introduction and
longitudinal shear
53
G. Hanswille
Load introduction over the steel section Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
shear forces of studs based on elastic theory shear forces of studs based on plastic theory
2 2
N Mc + s,Ed Mc + s,Ed N M
max PEd = c + s,Ed
+ xi + zi max PEd = c + s,Ed + c + s,Ed
n ri
2 r 2 n eh 0,5 n
i
n number of
PEd(N) zi studs within the
xi
Ped,v ri load introduction
eh
Ped,h P (M) length
Ed
Nc+s,Ed Mc+s,Ed
Mc+s,Ed Nc+s,Ed
56
G. Hanswille
Shear resistance of stud connectors welded Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
to the web of partially encased I-Sections Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
PRd
Dc
PRd / 2 PRd / 2
VLR,Rd/2
1
PRd,1 = 0,29 d2 fck Ecm
v
VL,Rd = n PRd + VLR,Rd VLR,Rd = PRd PRd= min
d2 1
PRd,2 = 0,8 fu
4 v
F F F F
F [kN]
3500
3000
2500
2000
test series S1 test series S2
1500
test S3/3
1000
test S1/3
500
w [mm]
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
59
G. Hanswille
Load introduction longitudinal shear Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
forces in concrete Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
F [kN]
2000
Fu = 1608 kN
1500
1000 F
F
w test I/1
500
w [mm]
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 61
G. Hanswille
Load introduction Examples Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
(Airport Hannover) Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
62
G. Hanswille
Load introduction with partially loaded Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
end plates Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
63
G. Hanswille
Load introduction with distance plates for Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
columns with inner steel cores Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
distance plates
64
G. Hanswille
Composite columns with hollow sections Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Load introduction Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
stiffeners and
gusset plate distance plates
end plates
Stiffener
c
c
Distance c
plate
65
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Mechanical model Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
Ac t fy
PcR,m = fc A1 1+ cL
A1 d fc c
a
A1
Effect of
Effect of partially
confinement by the Ac
loaded area
tube
c,r
a,t
a,t
c,L = 3,5 c,L = 4,9
66
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Typical load-deformation curves Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
P [MN]
series SXIII
2.5 Pu
2.0 Pu,stat
P
1.5
P [MN]
1.0 Pu series SV
5.0
0.5
[mm] 4.0 Pu,stat
0
P
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 3.0
2.0
1.0
[mm]
0 5 10 15 20
67
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Test evaluation according to EN 1990 Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
re [MN]
10,0 Pc,Rm
8,0
41 tests
Vr= 0.14
6,0
Pc,Rk = 0.78 Pc,Rm c
4,0 a,x
A1
t fy Ac c,r
PcR,m = fc A 1 1+ cL
d fc A1
a,y a,y
68
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Load distribution by end plates Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
~1d
F [kN]
Fu
6000
ts tp
Fu = 6047 kN
4000 Fu,stat = 4750 kN
c
u = 7.5 mm
2000 bc
[mm] bc = t s + 5 t p
5,0 10,0 15,0
69
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Design rules according to EN 1994-1-1 Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
70
G. Hanswille
Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Verification outside the areas of load introduction Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
F
Outside the area of load introduction,
A longitudinal shear at the interface
pure bond
between concrete and steel should be
(adhesion) verified where it is caused by
transverse loads and / or end
moments. Shear connectors should
B be provided, based on the distribution
of the design value of longitudinal
mechanical
interlock
shear, where this exceeds the design
shear strength Rd.
In absence of a more accurate
method, elastic analysis, considering
C
long term effects and cracking of
friction concrete may be used to determine
the longitudinal shear at the interface.
r
71
G. Hanswille
Design shear strength Rd Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Institute for Steel and
Composite Structures
University of Wuppertal-Germany
bc
cy b cy Rd,o= 0,30 N/mm2
concrete cz Rd = Rd,o c
encased c
h hc c = 1 + 0,02 c z 1 z,min 2,5
sections cz
y
cz cz- nominal concrete cover [mm]