Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Stability
Assessment
Guidelines
City Development
Planning and Environment
Directorate
March 2016
Geotechnical stability assessment guidelines
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Developments with geotechnical stability issues ............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Geotechnical stability assessment criteria ...................................................................................................... 1
2. DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS ........................................................................... 3
2.1 Landslide risk assessment .................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Geotechnical site investigation .............................................................................................................. 5
2.3 Geotechnical certifications .................................................................................................................... 6
3. DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN AREAS ....................................................................................... 6
3.1 Ground improvement techniques .......................................................................................................... 6
3.1.1 Preloading ................................................................................................................................ 7
3.1.2 Preloading with vertical drains .................................................................................................. 7
3.1.3 Sand drains .............................................................................................................................. 9
3.1.4 Prefabricated vertical drains ..................................................................................................... 9
3.1.5 Stabilisation with lime/cement ................................................................................................ 11
4. DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING DEEP EXCAVATIONS ............................................................................... 11
4.1 Deep excavation retention system ...................................................................................................... 11
4.2 Stability assessment of deep excavation ............................................................................................ 12
4.3 Geotechnical certifications .................................................................................................................. 13
5. DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING BATTERS AND/OR RETAINING STRUCTURES ..................................... 13
5.1 Stability assessment of batters ........................................................................................................... 13
5.2 Stability assessment of retaining structures ........................................................................................ 14
5.3 Geotechnical certifications .................................................................................................................. 15
6. PRESENTATION OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................................ 15
7. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 15
8. APPENDICES................................................................................................................................................ 16
Appendix A Landslide susceptibility analysis form ..................................................................................... 16
Appendix B Correlation between relative susceptibility and susceptibility rating ....................................... 17
Appendix C Subdivision landslide encumbrance form ............................................................................... 18
Appendix D Standard pro-forma for geotechnical certification ................................................................... 19
ii
Lists of Tables
Table 2 Details of landslide risk issues for various development applications .................................................... 4
Table 3 Geotechnical certifications for developments within landslide hazard areas .......................................... 6
iiii
List of Figures
Figure 3 Mandrel-driven pipes and continuous flight hollow auger methods ....................................................... 9
Figure 7 Typical retaining structure and lateral earth pressure distributions ..................................................... 14
iiiiii
1. INTRODUCTION
This document has been developed to provide guidelines on geotechnical stability assessment and
management issues associated with various types of development applications. These geotechnical
issues should be assessed and submitted in support of any development applications to the Council of
the City of Gold Coast (Council) for review and approval. The main purpose of this document is to
provide a framework for informed decision-making process by Council regarding geotechnical stability
issues associated with any development applications. This document will assist the applicants and their
consultants in preparing a relevant geotechnical report in support of a development application and will
also assist Council during the application assessment process, hence improves transparency and
understanding between the two parties. The key objectives of this document are to:
provide clarity and transparency regarding geotechnical stability concerns, issues and requirements
by Council in relation to any development application assessment and approval process
provide guidelines for preparing and submitting a relevant Geotechnical Stability Assessment
Report, if required, in support of any development application
improve efficiency and consistency in the development application assessment process
support development applications, which are geotechnically stable, safe and sound.
This document has been prepared to provide detailed guidelines for addressing various geotechnical
stability issues indicated in the Landslide Hazard Overlay Code and Change to Ground Level and
Creation of New Waterways Code of the City Plan.
1.1. Developments with geotechnical stability issues
From a geotechnical point view, this document identifies four (4) types of developments involving
geotechnical stability issues:
Developments within landslide hazard areas
Developments within flood plain areas
Developments involving deep excavation
Developments involving batters and/or retaining structures.
1.2. Geotechnical stability assessment criteria
If any assessable development application falls within one of the following categories given in Table 1,
the applicant should submit a Geotechnical Stability Assessment Report (Geotechnical Report) in order
to proceed with the development application for assessment and approval by Council.
Table 1 Criteria for requirement of a geotechnical stability assessment report
Is a geotechnical stability
Type of development
assessment report required?
Developments within landslide hazard areas:
if the site is partially or completely identified on Landslide
Hazard Overlay Map of the City Plan Yes
Developments within flood plain areas:
if the site is located within the area identified on Flood Overlay
Map of the City Plan Yes
Developments involving deep excavation that is greater than 3 metres
in depth. Yes
Developments involving:
cut/fill batters greater than 3 metres in height/depth Yes
retaining structures greater than 3 metres in height Yes
Figure 1 shows a flowchart for various geotechnical stability assessments that should be carried out and include
in a Geotechnical Report.
Figure 1: Flowchart for geotechnical stability assessment
Development application
Yes
Yes
Provide risk mitigation measures to reduce landslide risk Provide certification confirming that the
rating to low or better and certify that the site/lot/building site/lot/building envelope has been assessed
envelope will achieve a landslide risk rating of low or better with a landslide risk rating of low or better
subject to compliance with the risk mitigation measures
No
Yes
Yes
iiii
The following sections describe in detail the extent of geotechnical stability issues, assessments and
certifications that may need to be included in the Geotechnical Report.
2. DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS
For any proposed development on land within landslide hazard areas, as identified on Landslide Hazard
Overlay Map of the City Plan, there is a risk of landslide which must be assessed by a qualified expert
and submitted to Council for review and approval. The level of landslide risk depends on a number
of factors including ground slope angle and shape, strength of geomaterials and its distribution within
the subsurface, depth of groundwater table, potential for surface run-off concentration, orientation of
rock mass defects, etc. The applicant needs to assess the risk of landslide which may adversely affect
the subject site, adjoining properties and the proposed development.
According to Table 1 if the proposed development site is partially or completely identified on Landslide
Hazard Overlay Map, a Geotechnical Report is required by Council. In this case, the Geotechnical
Report should include a landslide risk assessment for the site in relation to the proposed development.
If the proposed development involves, or is expected to be involved with bulk earthworks, including
cut/fill with or without any retaining structures, the applicant also need to assess the stability of all
proposed cut/fill batters and retaining structures, as detailed in Section 5 of this document.
The following section outlines the details of landslide risk assessment, associated geotechnical site
investigation and geotechnical certifications that are required by Council for any proposed development
within landslide hazard areas.
2.1. Landslide risk assessment
The landslide risk assessment for the proposed development site should be conducted by a Registered
Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) specialising in geotechnical engineering, particularly
experienced in landslide risk assessment and management issues. The landslide risk assessment
should be carried out using site-specific geotechnical information, site slope, surface features, historical
landslide information, groundwater table and any other relevant information of the site. The landslide
risk assessment results should be included in the Geotechnical Report. The landslide risk assessment
should be carried out generally in accordance with the methodology presented in the document:
Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Report for the City of the Gold Coast, prepared by SMEC AUST
PTY LTD, dated August 2011.
According to the above referenced report, for any proposed development or re-development on any
site/lot mapped with landslide hazard, a landslide relative susceptibility analysis should be carried out
first using the Landslide Susceptibility Analysis Form attached in Appendix A. The calculated relative
susceptibility should then be correlated to susceptibility rating using the table given in Appendix B.
If the result of the landslide susceptibility rating analysis is Low or Very Low, then a further risk
assessment of the proposed development impacting any adjoining buildings/properties should be
conducted. Finally, the report should include a certification from a RPEQ specialising in geotechnical
engineering confirming that the proposed development site/lot has been assessed with a landslide risk
rating of Low or better and that the proposed development will not cause any adverse impact on any
adjoining buildings, properties and infrastructures.
In case the result of the landslide susceptibility rating analysis is moderate or higher, a detailed
landslide risk assessment following the Australian Geomechanics Society (AGS) Landslide Risk
Management Guideline 2007 should be carried out in order to determine whether the risk to life and
property is acceptable. In this regard a Low or Very Low risk is acceptable to Council. If the result of
the landslide risk assessment following the AGS 2007 method is still Moderate or higher, a detailed
risk mitigation measures and engineering recommendations to reduce the landslide risk to an
acceptable level should be included with the report. Finally, the report should include a certification
from a RPEQ specialising in geotechnical engineering confirming that the proposed development
site/lot has been assessed with a landslide risk rating of Low or better and that the proposed
development will not cause any adverse impact on any adjoining buildings, properties and
infrastructures, subject to compliance with the risk mitigation measures and engineering
recommendations (if any) of the report.
The report should generally examine feasibility and suitability of the proposed development with regard
to landslide risk issues for the site. If the proposed development involves on-site effluent disposal
system, the risk assessment should consider potential saturation and softening of the soils within the
effluent disposal areas and their impacts on the long-term stability of the site.
iiiiii
Table 2 describes the details of landslide risk issues for different types of development applications that
should be addressed in a geotechnical stability assessment report.
Table 2 Details of landslide risk issues for various development applications
ivi v
In order to assess the effective stress shear strength parameters (c and ), one may need to conduct
consolidated drained compression tests in the laboratory. These parameters will provide representative
shear strengths of soils for the long-term conditions.
2.3. Geotechnical certifications
In addition to the abovementioned landslide risk assessment, the applicant should provide a number of
Geotechnical Certifications (refer to Table 3) from a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland
(RPEQ) specialising in geotechnical engineering for any proposed development within landslide hazard
areas. These certifications will provide assurance of geotechnical stability for the proposed development
site and will also provide a summary of the complex landslide risk assessment process. These
certifications should be prepared using the standard pro-forma given in Appendix D and should be
included with the Geotechnical Report.
Table 3 describes the relevant Geotechnical Certifications required by Council for various types of
development applications within the landslide hazard areas.
Table 3 Geotechnical certifications for developments within landslide hazard areas
If the landslide risk assessment determines the site/lot/building envelope with a landslide risk rating of
Low or better
Certification from a RPEQ specialising in geotechnical engineering confirming that the
proposed development is appropriate for the sloping nature of the site, the risk of MCU ROL OPW
landslide on the subject site/lot (or each of the proposed lots for Subdivisions) adversely
affecting the proposed development and adjoining properties/ structures and the risk of
landslide on any upslope external properties impacting the proposed development is
Low or better.
If the landslide risk assessment determines the site/lot/building envelope with a landslide risk rating of
Moderate or worse
Certification from a RPEQ specialising in geotechnical engineering confirming that the
proposed development is appropriate for the sloping nature of the site, the risk of MCU ROL OPW
landslide on the subject site/lot (or each of the proposed lots for Subdivisions) adversely
affecting the proposed development and adjoining properties/ structures and the risk of
landslide on any upslope external properties impacting the proposed development is
Low or better, subject to compliance with the risk mitigation measures and engineering
recommendations of the report.
vi vi
3.1.1. Preloading
Preloading (or pre-compression) is one of the inexpensive and effective methods to improve a site
containing soft and compressible clays. Preloading is very effective on normal to lightly over-
consolidated silts and clays. If the soft deposits are thick and not intercepted by alternating sand seams,
the preloading alone may not be an effective method to consolidate the soft clay layer. In this case, the
use of sand drains or prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) in addition to preloading would be a better
technique to improve the soft subsoils.
Usually, the preload surcharge is greater than the estimated weight of the proposed structures so that
post-construction settlement becomes negligible and remains within tolerable limits. The placement of
preload surcharge would increase the total stresses as well as pore water pressures in the soft
deposits. Over time, usually after a couple of months to years, depending on the permeability and length
of the drainage paths, the excess pore water pressures will be dissipated, leading to increase in
effective stresses and shear strengths of the subsoils.
In this technique, consolidation of soft subsoils generally takes a long time, which may be unacceptable
to many construction projects. In order to accelerate the consolidation process, preloading is often
supplemented by vertical drains (sand drains or PVDs), as discussed below.
3.1.2. Preloading with vertical drains
In preloading, consolidation process usually takes a long time because the pore water pressure
dissipates in one direction vertical only. For a thick, soft and saturated cohesive subsoil layer, the
length of this vertical drainage path can be substantially long, leading to longer consolidation time. By
installing closely spaced vertical drains (for example, sand drains or PVDs) through the soft deposits,
the length of drainage paths will be significantly reduced as the pore pressure will now dissipate
horizontally towards the adjacent vertical drains. Consequently, the consolidation time will be
significantly reduced compared to preloading without vertical drains.
Figure 2 shows the typical preloading concept and the benefits of preloading with vertical drains in
terms of reduced consolidation time.
vii vii
(a)
Surcharge Surcharge
Soft ground
consolidates
under preloading
(b) (c)
Settlement
Time
(d)
The preloading technique with vertical drains, particularly with PVDs, is now widely used to consolidate
and improve grounds containing soft and saturated cohesive soils. The following sections provide a brief
overview regarding sand drains, PVD and lime/cement stabilisation.
viii viii
Figure 3 refers to two (2) methods of installing sand drains (after Bowles, J. E., Foundation Analysis
th
and Design, 4 Edition, McGraw-Hill Incorporated 1988).
ixi x
The geotextile cover acts as a filtering layer to reduce core clogging. The central grooved core acts as
the main drainage channel. The width of the PVD typically varies from 100 to 300 millimetres with the
thickness from three (3) to six (6) millimetres. The PVDs are available in rolls and can be installed very
fast (for example, less than a minute for one PVD installation).
Figure 5 shows typical installation of PVDs on a site using special installation rigs.
Figure 5 Installation of prefabricated vertical drains
xx
The structural system for supporting the excavation faces can be of three (3) types:
cantilever
anchored
braced.
xi xi
The stability assessment should demonstrate that the proposed shoring/retention system for supporting
the basement excavation will be stable enough with a factor of safety not less than 1.5 against failure.
The applicant should also assess suitability of the proposed basement excavation methodology and
examine whether the basement excavation support system requires any ground anchoring into any
adjacent properties or road reserve. If ground anchoring is proposed to penetrate into any adjacent
Council maintained road reserve, the applicant needs to obtain a separate permit from Council to
interfere with a road temporary ground anchors (Subordinate of Local Law 11.1, section 5). Please
refer to: http://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/documents/fa/fm673-permit-to-interfere.pdf.
The applicant should note the following in case ground anchoring is required into any adjacent private
property or State controlled road/reserve:
the installation of any ground anchors into any adjacent private property will require consent of the
relevant property owner(s) and is not assessed or approved by Council
the installation of any ground anchors into any adjacent State controlled road/reserve will require a
Road Corridor Permit from the Department of Transport and Main Roads, and is not assessed or
approved by Council.
In addition to the abovementioned stability assessment, the applicant should provide a site-monitoring
plan for the entire construction period and a post-construction period of at least three months in order to
ensure no adverse impact on the stability and integrity of the adjacent properties/structures. The
monitoring plan should include plans and cross-sectional drawings showing the locations and
parameters to be monitored, frequency of monitoring, threshold value of any parameter that will trigger
immediate cessation of all site works in order to maintain the stability and integrity of the adjoining
properties/structures. The applicant also needs to provide a contingency plan in case any instability of
the adjacent properties/structures arises or is detected during the construction period.
xii xii
xiii xiii
xi vxi v
For the proposed retaining structures the applicant should assess factor of safety against the following:
sliding caused by the active earth pressure and resistance by passive earth pressure and frictional
force at the base the retaining structure
overturning about the toe (point O in Figure 7) as a result of the driving moment caused by the
active earth pressure and resisting moment caused by the passive earth pressure, the self- weight
of the retaining structure and weight of the retained soils behind the structure
global slope instability considering a number of large slip circles passing through the underneath of
the retaining structure and the retained soils.
The stability assessment should ensure that all retaining structures will achieve a factor of safety
(FOS) greater than or equal to 1.5 against sliding, overturning and global slope instability.
5.3. Geotechnical certifications
All development applications involving batters and/or retaining structures should include a certification
from a RPEQ specialising in geotechnical engineering confirming that all cut/fill batters and/or
retaining structures associated with the proposed development have been adequately designed to
achieve a long-term factor of safety greater than or equal to 1.5 against geotechnical failure. The
certification should be prepared using the standard pro-forma given in Appendix D and should be
included with the Geotechnical Report.
6. PRESENTATION OF THE REPORT
The Geotechnical Stability Assessment Report should be written in such a way that it is regarded as a
self-contained document, which does not require the reader to refer to any other documents including
Council files, maps, drawings, previous applications or other reports (if any). If it does require referring
to any other documents, it should include a copy of those documents as attachments.
The report should include, but not necessarily limited to, the following:
a cover page with a title of the report, revision number, property address, real property description
(lot and plan numbers), report reference number, authors name and date
the body of the report including the context within which the report was commissioned, the purpose
of the report, geotechnical site investigation results, landslide risk assessment results, slope stability
assessment results for cut/fill batters and/or retaining walls, soft ground improvement techniques
and stability assessment of deep excavations (if any)
any maps, plans, drawings, cross-sections referred to in the report
borehole records, laboratory and field test results
landslide susceptibility rating calculations
slope stability calculations for batters and retaining walls
basement excavation stability calculations
geotechnical certifications.
7. REFERENCES
City of Gold Coast: Gold Coast City Plan;
SMEC (2011): Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Report for the City of the Gold Coast, August 2011;
Australian Geomechanics Society (2007): Practice Note Guideline for Landslide Risk Management
2007, Journal of the Australian Geomechanics Society, Vol. 42, No. 1, March 2007.
xvxv
8. APPENDICES
Appendix A Landslide susceptibility analysis form (extracted from the document: Landslide
Susceptibility Assessment Report for the City of the Gold Coast, SMEC, August 2011)
xvi xvi
Appendix B Correlation between relative susceptibility and susceptibility rating (extracted from
the document: Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Report for the City of the Gold Coast, SMEC,
August 2011)
xvii xvii
Property details
Address
Estate name
Estate stage
Council reference
Please use the following abbreviations to re-categorise the SMEC landslide risk rating.
Encumbrances shall be defined in accordance with the following abbreviations for landslide risk rating:
VH = Very high
H = High
M = Moderate
L = Low
VL = Very low
Proposed subdivided allotments
Final landslide risk rating for:
Proposed lot number Plan number Relative susceptibility
Lot Building pad Effluent disposal area
Name of engineer
Signature
Date
xviii xviii
Property details
Lot number
Registered plan number
Address
Proposed works
Description
Proposed development
Description
Declaration
Registered Professional
I, Engineer of Queensland
(RPEQ) number
of (Consulting engineers firm)
being duly authorised on this behalf, do certify that:
I am aware that the City of Gold Coast will rely upon this certificate and any associated geotechnical reports, maps,
graphs, tables, attachments, etc, produced as a consequence of commissioning this technical assessment.
Signature Designation
xi xxi x