The Forgotten Fruit: Textual theory and the

textual paradigm of narrative

Catherine Q. L. Werther

Department of Literature, Harvard University

1. The textual paradigm of narrative and
the materialist paradigm of
discourse
If one examines Foucaultist power relations, one is
faced with a choice:
either accept textual theory or conclude that
consciousness serves to entrench
hierarchy, given that language is distinct from
narrativity. It could be said
that Derrida uses the term the textual paradigm of
narrative to denote the
meaninglessness, and eventually the fatal flaw, of
precultural sexual identity.
The materialist paradigm of discourse suggests that
the significance of the
observer is social comment.
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the concept of
constructivist sexuality. However, the subject is interpolated into a textual
theory that includes art as a totality. Any number of discourses concerning the
materialist paradigm of discourse exist.
Society is part of the defining characteristic of sexuality, says Debord;
however, according to Brophy[1] , it is not so much society
that is part of the defining characteristic of sexuality, but rather the
meaninglessness, and some would say the defining characteristic, of society.
Therefore, in 8 1/2, Fellini reiterates textual theory; in
Amarcord, however, he examines capitalist posttextual theory. Derridas
essay on textual theory implies that reality is fundamentally elitist, but only
if the premise of the textual paradigm of narrative is invalid.
The primary theme of Porters[2] analysis of the
materialist paradigm of discourse is not theory, but neotheory. Thus,
Baudrillard promotes the use of textual theory to attack sexism. If the textual
paradigm of narrative holds, the works of Fellini are postmodern.
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the distinction between
without and within. It could be said that the materialist paradigm of discourse
states that the law is capable of intent. Bataille suggests the use of
predialectic discourse to challenge and modify sexual identity.
The characteristic theme of the works of Fellini is the collapse, and
subsequent fatal flaw, of textual language. But Debord uses the term textual
theory to denote the role of the reader as poet. In 8 1/2, Fellini
analyses neoconstructive situationism; in La Dolce Vita, although, he
reiterates textual theory.
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the concept of capitalist
sexuality. Therefore, Bataille uses the term the materialist paradigm of
discourse to denote the rubicon, and eventually the failure, of
postpatriarchial sexual identity. An abundance of discourses concerning a
self-sufficient reality may be found.
If one examines textual theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject
the materialist paradigm of discourse or conclude that truth is unattainable,
given that sexuality is interchangeable with reality. Thus, Long[3] implies that the works of Fellini
are an example of
capitalist socialism. Several narratives concerning the textual paradigm of
narrative exist.
In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the distinction between
feminine and masculine. In a sense, in The Limits of Interpretation
(Advances in Semiotics), Eco affirms the prestructural paradigm of
narrative; in Foucaults Pendulum, however, he examines the materialist
paradigm of discourse. The main theme of Abians[4] critique
of textual theory is the role of the participant as poet.
Class is intrinsically used in the service of outmoded, sexist perceptions
of society, says Lyotard. It could be said that if the textual paradigm of
narrative holds, the works of Eco are empowering. Debords essay on
postcultural deappropriation states that the goal of the writer is
deconstruction.
If one examines the textual paradigm of narrative, one is faced with a
choice: either accept the materialist paradigm of discourse or conclude that
the State is capable of significance, but only if the premise of textual theory
is valid; if that is not the case, Lyotards model of the materialist paradigm
of discourse is one of textual Marxism, and therefore part of the collapse of
art. But Marx uses the term the subcapitalist paradigm of expression to
denote the difference between class and society. Any number of discourses
concerning the failure, and thus the stasis, of modernist class may be
revealed.
It could be said that the example of textual theory which is a central theme
of Ecos The Name of the Rose is also evident in Foucaults
Pendulum, although in a more self-supporting sense. The primary theme of
the works of Eco is the role of the observer as reader.
In a sense, de Selby[5] implies that we have to choose
between the materialist paradigm of discourse and capitalist precultural
theory. Lacan promotes the use of the textual paradigm of narrative to
deconstruct sexism.
But if the materialist paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose
between textual theory and deconstructive narrative. Bataille uses the term
the materialist paradigm of discourse to denote the bridge between sexual
identity and society.
However, the subject is contextualised into a textual paradigm of narrative
that includes reality as a paradox. Foucault suggests the use of textual theory
to read narrativity.
It could be said that Derrida uses the term the textual paradigm of
narrative to denote not, in fact, theory, but posttheory. Neostructuralist
narrative holds that consensus must come from communication.
But Sartre uses the term the materialist paradigm of discourse to denote a
material totality. Sontags model of textual theory implies that truth is
capable of truth.
Thus, Finnis[6] states that we have to choose between the
textual paradigm of narrative and the conceptualist paradigm of consensus. If
neocultural constructivist theory holds, the works of Eco are an example of
self-falsifying Marxism.
It could be said that an abundance of theories concerning textual theory
exist. Hanfkopf[7] suggests that we have to choose between
patriarchial narrative and neocapitalist feminism.
In a sense, the characteristic theme of de Selbys[8]
essay on the materialist paradigm of discourse is the role of the participant
as observer. A number of materialisms concerning the common ground between
class and society may be discovered.
Therefore, the closing/opening distinction prevalent in Joyces A
Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man emerges again in Finnegans
Wake. If the textual paradigm of narrative holds, we have to choose between
textual theory and the textual paradigm of narrative.
It could be said that the main theme of the works of Joyce is a
mythopoetical paradox. The materialist paradigm of discourse implies that
reality comes from the masses.
But many narratives concerning the textual paradigm of narrative exist.
Derridas model of textual theory states that the significance of the
participant is social comment, but only if culture is distinct from
narrativity.
Thus, Tilton[9] implies that we have to choose between
the materialist paradigm of discourse and capitalist premodern theory.
Baudrillard uses the term textual theory to denote not desemioticism per se,
but subdesemioticism.

2. Joyce and the textual paradigm of narrative

Class is unattainable, says Sartre; however, according to Scuglia[10] , it is not so much class that
is unattainable, but
rather the paradigm, and some would say the stasis, of class. It could be said
that if the materialist paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose between
dialectic feminism and pretextual materialism. Several narratives concerning
the difference between society and narrativity may be found.
In a sense, Parry[11] holds that we have to choose
between textual theory and the neosemanticist paradigm of discourse. Sontag
uses the term conceptual libertarianism to denote not patriarchialism, but
prepatriarchialism.
However, the premise of textual theory implies that expression is a product
of communication. Sartre promotes the use of subcultural discourse to challenge
class divisions.

Class is part of the meaninglessness of truth, says Sartre. If precultural

sublimation holds, we have to choose between textual nationalism and
neoconceptualist theory.
If one examines precultural sublimation, one is faced with a choice: either
reject dialectic subsemanticist theory or conclude that sexuality is a legal
fiction, but only if Batailleist `powerful communication is valid. In a sense,
Sontags essay on textual narrative states that truth is used to reinforce
hierarchy. Baudrillard promotes the use of Batailleist `powerful communication
to challenge colonialist perceptions of society.
Sexual identity is fundamentally elitist, says Lacan; however, according
to Humphrey[1] , it is not so much sexual identity that is
fundamentally elitist, but rather the collapse, and eventually the stasis, of
sexual identity. Thus, several dematerialisms concerning a self-supporting
totality may be discovered. Debord suggests the use of dialectic subsemanticist
theory to attack society.
It could be said that Sontag uses the term precultural sublimation to
denote not theory, but pretheory. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic
subsemanticist theory that includes sexuality as a paradox.
But Abian[2] holds that we have to choose between
Batailleist `powerful communication and neodialectic situationism. Bataille
uses the term precultural sublimation to denote the dialectic of semanticist
culture.
It could be said that if dialectic subsemanticist theory holds, the works of
Tarantino are modernistic. Hanfkopf[3] states that we have
to choose between structuralist deconstruction and neomaterial theory.
Therefore, many situationisms concerning Batailleist `powerful
communication exist. Textual subcapitalist theory implies that the
establishment is part of the failure of truth.

2. Expressions of economy
The characteristic theme of Hamburgers[4] model of
precultural sublimation is the role of the poet as artist. But the main theme
of the works of Tarantino is not deappropriation, as textual theory suggests,
but postdeappropriation. Sartre uses the term dialectic subsemanticist theory
to denote the role of the reader as observer.
Society is intrinsically impossible, says Lacan. Therefore, the
characteristic theme of Parrys[5] analysis of the
capitalist paradigm of narrative is a mythopoetical totality. The premise of
dialectic subsemanticist theory suggests that consensus is created by the
collective unconscious.
The primary theme of the works of Tarantino is the rubicon, and subsequent
defining characteristic, of posttextual class. Thus, Marx uses the term
Batailleist `powerful communication to denote not, in fact, discourse, but
subdiscourse. The example of capitalist situationism prevalent in Tarantinos
Jackie Brown emerges again in Four Rooms, although in a more
self-justifying sense.
Sexual identity is responsible for hierarchy, says Bataille; however,
according to Wilson[6] , it is not so much sexual identity
that is responsible for hierarchy, but rather the stasis of sexual identity. In
a sense, the characteristic theme of la Tourniers[7]
critique of precultural sublimation is the difference between language and
society. Debord promotes the use of Batailleist `powerful communication to
challenge outdated perceptions of class.
In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the concept of
constructivist truth. But the subject is contextualised into a subcultural
paradigm of discourse that includes consciousness as a whole. If Batailleist
`powerful communication holds, the works of Tarantino are postmodern.
Art is fundamentally elitist, says Foucault. It could be said that
Baudrillard uses the term capitalist theory to denote the role of the reader
as artist. The primary theme of the works of Tarantino is the collapse, and
subsequent genre, of neodialectic class.
In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a precultural sublimation that
includes narrativity as a reality. The characteristic theme of Humphreys[8] analysis of Sontagist
camp is not discourse as such, but
prediscourse.
But the subject is contextualised into a Batailleist `powerful
communication that includes consciousness as a totality. The primary theme of
the works of Tarantino is the absurdity of postcapitalist sexual identity.
However, the feminine/masculine distinction intrinsic to Tarantinos
Jackie Brown is also evident in Four Rooms. Sartre uses the term
precultural sublimation to denote a mythopoetical whole.
It could be said that a number of theories concerning the role of the
observer as poet may be found. Lacan uses the term textual predialectic
theory to denote the bridge between class and sexual identity.
Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a Batailleist `powerful
communication that includes sexuality as a totality. Foucault uses the term
dialectic subsemanticist theory to denote the futility, and eventually the
defining characteristic, of modern class.
Thus, the main theme of de Selbys[9] model of
precultural sublimation is the common ground between truth and society. Many
deappropriations concerning Batailleist `powerful communication exist.
Therefore, Sontag suggests the use of postdeconstructivist sublimation to
modify and analyse sexual identity. Lyotard uses the term dialectic
subsemanticist theory to denote a self-sufficient reality.
However, several discourses concerning the role of the reader as observer
may be revealed. Foucault uses the term material situationism to denote a
neoconstructivist whole.
3. Dialectic subsemanticist theory and capitalist feminism
Class is part of the failure of sexuality, says Debord; however, according
to Abian[10] , it is not so much class that is part of the
failure of sexuality, but rather the paradigm, and some would say the stasis,
of class. Therefore, Derrida promotes the use of subtextual patriarchialist
theory to attack capitalism. Foucault uses the term Batailleist `powerful
communication to denote not discourse, but postdiscourse.
In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between
masculine and feminine. In a sense, precultural construction holds that
narrativity is intrinsically impossible, but only if sexuality is distinct from
reality; if that is not the case, consciousness has objective value.
DErlette[11] suggests that we have to choose between
capitalist feminism and structural subtextual theory.
Thus, Sartre uses the term precultural sublimation to denote a
mythopoetical paradox. Marx suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful
communication to modify society.
Therefore, Sartre uses the term precultural sublimation to denote the
stasis of cultural sexual identity. A number of narratives concerning
Batailleist `powerful communication exist.
In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a capitalist feminism that
includes truth as a reality. The characteristic theme of the works of Eco is a
self-referential whole.

4. Contexts of genre
Society is dead, says Sontag. Thus, Lyotard promotes the use of
precultural sublimation to deconstruct outmoded, sexist perceptions of class.
If Batailleist `powerful communication holds, we have to choose between
precultural sublimation and posttextual discourse.
Sexuality is part of the defining characteristic of consciousness, says
Marx; however, according to la Fournier[12] , it is not so
much sexuality that is part of the defining characteristic of consciousness,
but rather the failure, and therefore the genre, of sexuality. It could be said
that the subject is interpolated into a Batailleist `powerful communication
that includes culture as a totality. Derrida suggests the use of capitalist
feminism to analyse and read class.
In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of subcultural
truth. But several narratives concerning not theory, but posttheory may be
discovered. Marx uses the term precultural sublimation to denote the fatal
flaw, and subsequent meaninglessness, of dialectic society.
The primary theme of Werthers[13] analysis of
capitalist feminism is not, in fact, theory, but pretheory. Therefore, any
number of narratives concerning Batailleist `powerful communication exist.
Derridas model of the patriarchialist paradigm of narrative states that the
collective is a legal fiction.
In a sense, Baudrillard uses the term precultural sublimation to denote a
mythopoetical whole. The premise of Batailleist `powerful communication
suggests that the task of the writer is deconstruction.
It could be said that Porter[14] implies that the works
of Eco are empowering. Lacan promotes the use of capitalist feminism to
challenge the status quo.
In a sense, Sontags critique of neocapitalist textual theory suggests that
context comes from the masses, given that precultural sublimation is invalid.
In Finnegans Wake, Joyce analyses capitalist feminism; in A Portrait
of the Artist As a Young Man he deconstructs precultural sublimation.
Therefore, the main theme of the works of Joyce is the stasis, and
eventually the economy, of subdialectic sexual identity. The example of
Batailleist `powerful communication which is a central theme of Joyces
Finnegans Wake emerges again in Ulysses, although in a more
self-falsifying sense.
But Foucault uses the term precultural sublimation to denote the
difference between society and class. Many discourses concerning not theory, as
Baudrillard would have it, but posttheory may be found.
In a sense, if Batailleist `powerful communication holds, we have to choose
between capitalist feminism and textual appropriation. Derrida uses the term
Batailleist `powerful communication to denote a mythopoetical totality.

5. Joyce and precultural sublimation

If one examines subconstructivist capitalist theory, one is faced with a
choice: either accept Batailleist `powerful communication or conclude that
art, somewhat ironically, has intrinsic meaning. However, a number of
narratives concerning precultural sublimation exist. Lyotard uses the term
postconceptualist construction to denote the genre, and thus the paradigm, of
capitalist sexual identity.
The primary theme of Prinns[15] model of capitalist
feminism is the role of the poet as observer. In a sense, the premise of
precultural sublimation states that consensus is created by the collective
unconscious, but only if culture is interchangeable with sexuality; otherwise,
we can assume that art is fundamentally impossible. The subject is
contextualised into a Batailleist `powerful communication that includes
consciousness as a reality.
Class is a legal fiction, says Derrida; however, according to Long[16] , it is not so much class that
is a legal fiction, but
rather the failure, and subsequent stasis, of class. But Lacan uses the term
precultural sublimation to denote the common ground between sexual identity
and class. Sontag suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful communication to
modify truth.
Therefore, Humphrey[17] implies that we have to choose
between capitalist feminism and Foucaultist power relations. Several theories
concerning not discourse, but subdiscourse may be revealed.
It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a conceptual
capitalism that includes language as a paradox. Baudrillard uses the term
precultural sublimation to denote the paradigm, and some would say the
absurdity, of neodialectic sexual identity.
In a sense, the main theme of the works of Joyce is the role of the poet as
writer. Bataille promotes the use of cultural postdialectic theory to attack
elitist perceptions of class.
It could be said that if capitalist feminism holds, we have to choose
between Batailleist `powerful communication and Lyotardist narrative. Many
theories concerning precultural sublimation exist.

6. The material paradigm of expression and Foucaultist power relations

The characteristic theme of Picketts[18] analysis of
Foucaultist power relations is not desublimation per se, but subdesublimation.
But in Platoon, Stone analyses Batailleist `powerful communication; in
JFK, although, he affirms postcultural patriarchialist theory. Sartre
suggests the use of Foucaultist power relations to challenge and modify
society.
If one examines Batailleist `powerful communication, one is faced with a
choice: either reject Foucaultist power relations or conclude that the purpose
of the reader is significant form, given that Sontags essay on precultural
sublimation is valid. It could be said that Derrida uses the term Foucaultist
power relations to denote a self-referential whole. The subject is
contextualised into a Batailleist `powerful communication that includes
reality as a paradox.
Truth is part of the paradigm of reality, says Bataille. But the
destruction/creation distinction depicted in Stones Platoon is also
evident in Heaven and Earth. The premise of neodialectic modernism
suggests that the establishment is capable of truth.
Thus, Derrida promotes the use of Batailleist `powerful communication to
attack hierarchy. The primary theme of the works of Stone is not, in fact,
deconstruction, but postdeconstruction.
It could be said that several narratives concerning the bridge between
society and consciousness may be found. The subject is interpolated into a
precultural sublimation that includes culture as a reality.
However, the characteristic theme of Dahmuss[19]
analysis of Batailleist `powerful communication is the role of the artist as
writer. The subject is contextualised into a Foucaultist power relations that
includes consciousness as a paradox.
But in Natural Born Killers, Stone reiterates textual libertarianism;
in Heaven and Earth, however, he denies Batailleist `powerful
communication. Sontag suggests the use of substructuralist desublimation to
challenge sexual identity.

1. Brophy, G. V. ed. (1986) The

textual paradigm of narrative and textual theory. And/Or Press
2. Porter, S. (1977) Reinventing Realism: Textual theory
and the textual paradigm of narrative. Panic Button Books
3. Long, W. E. R. ed. (1990) Textual theory in the works
of Eco. Cambridge University Press
4. Abian, V. (1983) The Defining characteristic of
Context: Textual theory in the works of Joyce. Panic Button Books
5. de Selby, Y. U. H. ed. (1976) The textual paradigm of
narrative and textual theory. Loompanics
6. Finnis, M. (1999) The Narrative of Defining
characteristic: Textual theory, subdialectic sublimation and capitalism.
Panic Button Books
7. Hanfkopf, B. R. ed. (1978) Textual theory and the
textual paradigm of narrative. Schlangekraft
8. de Selby, Q. (1999) Consensuses of Futility: The
textual paradigm of narrative in the works of Joyce. Oxford University
Press
9. Tilton, G. W. ed. (1988) Textual theory, capitalism and
subdialectic discourse. Panic Button Books
10. Scuglia, N. A. F. (1971) The Meaninglessness of
Reality: The textual paradigm of narrative in the works of Pynchon.
University of Georgia Press
11. Parry, L. ed. (1990) The textual paradigm of
narrative and textual theory. Panic Button Books

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the
Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable
page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system
for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios
(this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 16,968,091 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST,
when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer
Science Technical Report 96/264: On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using
Recursive Transition Networks.