Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6
~~ CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW COUNTY _OF-NEW YORK ae RENAISSANCE 632 BROADWAY, LLC, Petitioner-Landlord, -against- CROMAN REAL ESTATE INC., & 632 BROADWAY, PORTION OF SEVENTH (7"") FL, fe NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10012, os Respondent(s)-Tenant(s), © 9300 REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC., “XYZ CORP.”, “JOHN DOE” and “JANE DOE”, Respondent(s)-Undertenant(s). PETITION HOLDOVER 17NO 17, BERLINER & PILSON Atorey for Ofice and Post Ofce Adress, Telephone, {40 CUTTER MILL ROAD SUITE 308 « GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 _ Tet: (S16) 3045855, ye — sy Bs Signature or fo.) ‘Pi nae beneath SaekeBesiner 2 Fichard dr Pson is hereby admitted. ‘AUG - 9.2) Attomeys)for Petitioner- Service of a copy ofthe within Dated, Awomey(s) for Please take notice Tr nonceor enter that the within isa (certified) true copy of @ duly entered in the office of the clerk ofthe within named court on nonce oF serrusuenr that an order of which the within is a true copy will be presented for settlement to the HON, one ofthe judges ofthe within named court, at on a M Dares ‘Yours, ete, FEEPAID BERLINER & PILSON LAN = To AUG 2 2047 ‘Atomeysfor YORK: Office and Post Office Address ‘Aorney) for NE NL COURT 40 CUTTER MILL ROAD SUITE 308 GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 tor-overmauree sr BumbergSiceter Inc. wre 10013 CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ae RENAISSANCE 632 BROADWAY, LLC, y fi T INDEX Petitioner-Landlord, i PETITION - ar HOLDOVER CROMAN REAL ESTATE INC., 632 BROADWAY, PORTION OF SEVENTH (7™) FL., ‘NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10012, Respondent(s)-Tenant(s), 9300 REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC., “XYZ CORP.”, “JOHN DOE” and “JANE DOE”, Respondent(s)-Undertenant(s). a “X ‘The Petition of RENAISSANCE 632 BROADWAY, LLC, alleges; as follows 71) 1. Petitioner is the Landlord and Owner of Premises PORTION OF SEVENTH ( iW YORK. FLOOR located at 632 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, 2. Respondent(s), CROMAN REAL ESTATE INC,, is in possession of the Premises as ‘Tenant pursuant to a Lease Agreement between Renaissance 632 Broadway LLC and Croman Real | Estate Inc. This proceeding is based upon a written Stipulation between Petitioner and Respondent, | and their respective counsels, a copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit "A", whereby the parties | agreed, upon certain conditions as are set forth therein, that Respondent could remain in possession 4s set forth in the Stipulation until July 31, 2017, but no longer than July 31, 2017. 3. Respondents, 9300 REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC. “XYZ CORP.” “JOHN DOE” and “JANE DOE", represent any and all of the Undertenants of the aforesaid Respondent, The EXHIBIT A 7 Pe names “XYZ. Corp.”, “JOHN DOE” and “JANE DOE” are fictitious appeliations intended to jes who are or may be in occupancy of the Subject Premises and describe any and all persons or e whose identities and names are unknown to the Petitioner. Respondent is now in possession of said Premises. ‘The Premises from which removal is sought where rented for commercial purposes (7) Floor at 632 Broadway, New York, New York, 4 5. and are described as follows: Portion of Seventh ( asdelineated on the annexed diagram, The Premises ae situated within the territorial jurisdiction of the Civil Court ofthe City of New York, County of New York. 6. The Premises are not subject to Rent Control, Rent Stabilization or the Emergency ‘Tenant Protection Act of 1974 because they are rented for business purposes. 7. The Premises are not a multiple dwelling. 8. Except for the Premises for which recovery of possession is being sought in this proceeding, Petitioner lacks written information on notice of any address where Respondent resides, is employed, has a place of business or a principle office in the State of New York 9. That the Respondent continues in possession of the Subject Premises pursuant to the annexed Stipulation. 10, Respondent is justly indebted to the Petitioner for the fair value of Respondent's use and occupancy of the Premises from August 1, 2017 st the holdover rate set forth in the expired Lease, pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation. Based on the foregoing, Petitioner respectfully requests: 1. A Final Judgment awarding possession of the Premises to Petitioner. 2 Issuance of a Warrant of Eviction thereon. EXHIBIT A | EXHIBIT A ai . ‘a ei i pd 3, Issuance of a Warrant of Evition for the purpose of removing Respondent from possession thereof. 4 ‘Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Dated: New York, New York August 1, 2017 RENAISSANCE 632 BROADWAY, LLC Petitioner EXHIBIT A (a i im to before me on CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK RH AISSANCE 632 BROADWAY, LLC, ans Petitioner-Landlord, -against- STIPULATION (ROMAN REAL ESTATE INC, Respondent(s)-Tenant(s), 9300REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC,, “XYZ CORP.”, “JOHN DOE” & “JANE DOE”, Respondent(s)-Undertenant(s). xX Respondents, CROMAN REAL ESTATE INC., 9300 REALTY MANAGEMENT, INC, “XYZ CORP.”, “JOE DOE” and “JANE DOE”, appear by Rose and Rose, 291 Broadway, 13* Floor, New York, New York 10007; Phone No. (212) 349-3366; Fax No. (212) 349-2292; Email: prose@roseandroselaw.com, and submit othe jurisdiction of this Cour, 2. Final Judgment of possession in favor of the Landlord against all Respondents. The Warrant of Eviction shall issue forthwith without stay of execution, 3. Respondents acknowledge that pursuant to the Lease by which they are in occupancy expired on December 31, 2016, and that they desire an extension of time to vacate the Subject Premises through June 30, 2017. The Petitioner agrces t s1:ch extension on the terms set forth herein, Except as is set forth in paragraph 16 Jew, !f Respondents do not vacate and ‘surrender full vacant possession of the Subject Premises to Ps-tiiore on or before June 30, 2017, Petitioner may immediately commence a Holdover Proceeding for the purpose of entering this Stipulation into the record and obtain a Final Judgment of Possession against all Respondents and have issuance of a Warrant of Eviction,