Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The semiotics is one of the scientific instruments for analyzing the discourse
system, which studies the components of meaning structure and creation in texts.
In semiotics, the gnosilogical characteristics of literary works will find the chance
to appear clearly by surpassing mere constructive semiotics to phenomenology
semiotics and showing the signs path of moving towards higher and more perfect
signs.
The beautiful poems of Oghab by Khanlari and Arash Kamangir by
Kasrayie are the narrative oriented kind of poetry, which have the narrative
characteristics due to having situational identity and various actions and
nourishing precious mythos actions at the end of the story. Therefore , these
two masterpieces are worth being studied and analyzed for semiotics
analysis and discourse system. The prescriptive discourse system and
manipulative ones are flowing at the beginning and in the middle of these
two stories. Later on, proceeding the discourses and appearance of the
narratives, two value systems are shaped, which through their conflicts, the
dynamic semiotics discourse is provided, leading to tensional system, which
is analyzable based on the expansion and pressure values.
This research studies these texts by means of Greimas comparative
approaches, passing through semantic square to tensional square while
analyzing the type of discourse systems including prescriptive, manipulative
and incidental ones in these two poems.
This research Further tries to find out up to which point Persian narrative
poetry is cable of analyzing the discourse systems ruling over it.
Keywords: Semiotics, Discourse narrative, Arah Kamangir, Oghab,
Tensional process
Corresponding Authors Email: fdavoudy@gmail.com
-
91/5/25 : 91/3/25 :
-
. -
.
4) 1 (13 1392124-105
- .
.
.
.
: - .
Email:fdavoudy@gmail.com :
- ...
.1
1
-
. -
2
) .(1 :1385
3 .
.
.
-
.
-
.
.
.2
... .
4 5 ... .
1 Semiotics
2 Process
3 Discourse sy stems
4
Greimas
5 Fonta nille
106
4 ) 1 (13 1392
. -
.
.
.3
:
. .
.
.
)( :
. .
) .. :1352
588 .(285 :1362
.
).(220 :1353
107
- ...
.4 -
-
.
6
.
7 -
.
.
-
)
.(6-1 :1388
- -
. (1974: 266) 8
.
:
)261 -217 :1385 .
(10-5 :1389
.
) . (14-12 :1371
.
6 Pheno me nolog y
7
Corporeite
8 Benveniste
108
4 ) 1 (13 1392
.5
9
. 10
)
.(11 :1388
-11
- .
).(12 :
.
.
)(53 :1387
:
) (
12
:
)(63 :1386
) .(38-37 :1379
).
.(138 :1370
9 1- Action
10 Courtes
11 The State
12
109
- ...
:
.
13
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
14 .
:
...
) ...(66 :1386
.
.
.
.
.
110
4 ) 1 (13 1392
15
.6
. .
.
.
.
.
:
)(55 :1387
:
) ...(69 :1386
.
16
) .(26 :1388
.
.
15 Mature character
16 Kerbrat-Orecchioni
111
- ...
17
) (1967: 150-166 .
21 20 19 18
: .
.
22
.7
.
.
:
)(68 :1386
.
:
:
) .(122 :1389
.
.
.
17 Freedman
18 Mature
19 - Reformist
20 - Testing
21 Degeneration
22 Descriptive discourse sy stem
112
4 ) 1 (13 1392
.8 23
.
.
)(
)(
).(67 :1385
:
113
- ...
.
:
.
:
.
.
: ).(Courtes, 2003: 95
.
.
:
:
:
114
4 ) 1 (13 1392
)(57 :1378
. :
... .
...
.
:
:
) ...(70 :1386
.
.9
24
.
) (64 :1385 .
24 persuatio n
115
- ...
).(66 :1371
:
-
-
:
... )(75 :1386
.
25
.10
.
:
.
25 Interpretation
116
4 ) 1 (13 1392
:
)(73 :1386
:
)(
.
.11
.
.
. .
.
. :
117
- ...
:
)(59 :1378
-
) .(22 :1388 ...
.
.
.
- . .
.
-
.
:
.
118
4 ) 1 (13 1392
.
.
.
:
.
:
:
:
:
:
.11-1
.
.
.
:
119
- ...
.
). .(40 :1388
.
x y . x y
.
.
) .(42 : :
120
4 ) 1 (13 1392
26
.12
.
-
.
.
.
:
)(75 :1387
:
26 Eventio na l
121
- ...
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.13
-
.
)
(
.
. -
-
-
.
122
4 ) 1 (13 1392
-
.
-
... .
.14
1. semiotics
2. process
3. discourse systems
4. Greimas
5. Fontanille
6. phenomenology
7. corporite
8. Benveniste
9. action
10. Courts
11. the state
.12
.
13. dynamic signs
14. tensional discourse
15. mature character
16. Kerbrat-Orecchioni
17. Freedman
18. mature
19. reformist
20. testing
21. degeneration
22. descriptive discourse system
23. manipulation discourse system
24. persuation
25. interpretation
26. eventional
123
- ...
.15
) .(1371 . : .
) .(1388 -.
: .
) .(1353 .
. : .
) .(1362 . : .
) .(1387 )( . :.
) .(1379 : . :.
) .(1385 - . ..
) .(1388 -
. : .
) .(1352 . :.
) .(1386 . :.
) .(1389 . .:
.
. ) .(1370 .
. :.
Reference:
Akhwat, Ahmad. (1992). Story Grammar. Isfahan: Farda Publication [In
Persian].
Asadollahi Tajraq , Allah shokr (2009). Semantics in Terms of Katherine Kerber
- Aurakyuny . Tehran : Elmi [In Persian].
Benveniste, E. (1970). "LAppareil Formal de Nonciation" in Language. Paris:
Larousse .
Biruni, Abu Rayhan Muhammad ibn Ahmad (1974). The Effects of Remaining
Free for Centuries. Trans. Akbar Dana Serasht. Tehran: National Heritage
124
1392 (13 )1 4
125