Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Keywords: mise-a-la-mase, interpretation, Sibayak field. productive zone of the field. This paper emphasizes the main
results of the MAM data interpretation by using residual
ABSTRACT resistivity distribution map and 3-D inversion analysis
Sibayak geothermal field is located about 65 km to the objected to the understanding of production zones based on
the lateral and vertical resistivity distribution.
southwest of Medan in the North Sumatra Province,
Indonesia. Recently, a small-scale geothermal power plant
(2 MWe) has been installed in this area. Since electricity
demand increases in the North Sumatra Province, Pertamina
(Geothermal Division) plans to increase the capacity to 20
MWe in the year 2005. Accordingly, detailed knowledge of
the reservoir structure and its extension must be determined.
The mise-a-la-masse (MAM) surveys were carried out in
this field using the exploration well SBY-1 and the
production well SBY-4 to delineate a new production target
for further field development. Interpretation of the MAM
data was done to correlate the results with formation
temperatures and lost circulation zones and finally to image
a promising reservoir zone. This interpretation result of
MAM data indicates that reservoir zones trends to the north-
northeast direction of the study area and shows a good
correlation with formation temperature and lost circulation
zone. This fact leads us to propose that the best production
target for the development of the Sibayak area is
characterized by the high temperature, high permeability and
high well productivity region marked by the dome- shaped Figure 1: Location map of Sibayak geothermal field.
resistivity zone below the conductive cap rocks.
2. FIELD OVERVIEW
1. INTRODUCTION The Sibayak geothermal field including ten-well locations is
shown in Figure 5. The field is situated in a high terrain area
There are more than thirty geothermal prospect area widely inside the Singkut caldera. The thermal features consist of
spreading in Sumatra island, Indonesia. The Sibayak solfataras and fumaroles at high elevations around the
geothermal field (Figure 1) is the first geothermal field summit of Mt. Sibayak, and chloride springs with silica
developed in Sumatra island under different stages of sinter at lower elevations in the southern and southeastern of
exploration. The exploration results confirmed that the Mt. Pratektekan around the Singkut caldera rim. There has
Sibayak field has potential for further development which been a complex volcanic history in the area with a number
the proven capacity is 40 MWe (Sudarman et al, 2000). In of centers of eruptions developing over a considerable
1995, Pertamina installed a small-scale geothermal power period of time within Quarternary.
plant 2.0 MWe in this area. In addition, through July 1999,
10 exploration and production wells have been drilled. Since In the area of the Singkut caldera, the Quarternary volcanic
electricity demand is increasing in the North Sumatra rock formation is divided into pre and post caldera units.
Province, Pertamina will expand the installed capacity to 20 The former includes Singkut dacite-andesite and Singkut
MWe in the year 2005. For this purpose, a new production laharic breccia, and the latter includes Simpulanangin
target in this area required to be delineated. pyroxene andesite, Pratektekan hornblende andesite Pintau
pyroxene andesite and Sibayak hornblende andesite. The
The main criteria of the production target are productivity, volcanic rock formation is composed of andesite, andesite
temperature and permeability. To investigate the best breccia, and tuff breccia. Relatively moderate clay and
production target, the reservoir structure and possible chloritic hydrothermal alteration are found within this
extension, the Sibayak field has been intensively studied by formation.
enhancing interpretation technique of the mise-a-la-masse
(MAM) data combined with formation temperature and The geological structure in the Sibayak area is mainly
permeability distribution zone. The results are integrated controlled by volcanic and tectonic processes. The caldera
with the production test data in order to develop the most structure is elongated to NW-SE (F1 to F4), and it was
1
Supriyanto et al.
developed after the Mt. Singkut volcanic eruption (0.1 Ma). surveyed area. The distant current C2 is placed at
Some fault structures within the caldera are oriented to NW- supposedly infinite distance away from the charged current
SE, which is parallel to Great Sumatera Fault, and extend to electrode C1. The fixed potential electrode P2 is placed at
the center of Mt. Sibayak and Mt. Pintau, where they are few kilometers away from the charged well C1 in opposite
intersected by the NE-SW fault structures (F5). The NW-SE direction to C2 in order to minimize electromagnetic
fault structures are also intersected by the NE-SW lineament coupling effects during field survey. Finally, the potential P1
(F6) encountered between Mt Sibayak and Mt Pratektekan. is placed around the well.
2
Supriyanto et al.
large CPU time is necessary for calculating Jacobian Sibayak area. In addition, another anomaly of low residual
matrixes especially in a 3-D inversion, Jacobian matrixes resistivity is recognized at the southern part of the Sibayak
proposed by Loke and Baker (1995) has been used for area, and is interpreted as a permeable zone outside the
minimizing a processing time in the program. Singkut caldera margin, which may have a connection to the
main reservoir.
4. FIELD MEASUREMENT
358500
The MAM surveys were carried out using the exploratory
well SBY-1 and the production well SBY-4. Those wells Mt. Sibayak
were selected as a current electrode C1 because the well 358000
well SBY-4.
Figure 3: Residual resistivity distribution of the Sibayak
The potential distribution on the ground surface was geothermal field derived from the MAM measurements.
measured through potential electrodes P1 and P2. The
potential electrode P1 was moved in radial direction from The 3-D inversion of the MAM data was conducted using a
the electrode C1 with 100 m separation. In the Sibayak 3-D block model based on the non-linear least squares
geothermal field, MAM measurements were conducted method. Figure 4 shows some contour resistivity maps
along 14 survey lines (163) points around the well SBY-1, variation respect to the depth as a result of the 3-D inversion
whereas around the well SBY-4 the measurements were program. In a shallow depth down to 250 m (Figure 4.A.),
conducted along 12 survey lines (148 points) as shown in the strongly altered rock zones indicated by low resistivity
Figure 5. The survey line could not be made in the same (less than 10 m) are widely distributed in the northern part
length due to field conditions. of the well SBY-4 inside the Singkut caldera. By careful
inspection to the map, it is obviously recognized that the low
The geoelectrical equipment used in this survey was a resistivity zone in the northern part of the well SBY-4
transmitter with 6 A square wave output, supported by 5 follows the NE-SW lineament (F6) encountered between Mt
kVA generator power supply, and receiver with reading Sibayak and Mt Pratektekan. In the opposite site, a smaller
ability up to 0.01 mV. The potential electrode P1 and P2 zone of the low resistivity is also found in the southern part
were immersed with saturated copper sulfate solution in the of the well SBY-4 separated by Singkut caldera rim.
porous pots, in order to eliminate the polarization effects Meanwhile, in the area around the well SBY-1, another
during measurement. small low resistivity zone is found in the eastern part of the
well. In the north of the well SBY-1, there is a big area of
5. RESULT the low resistivity zone, but because of no MAM stations in
The subsurface resistivity distribution is not homogeneous. that area, it can not be interpreted by the method. In addition,
the high resistivity zones (fresh volcanic rock) are mainly
It changes laterally and vertically caused by local resistivity
located outside the caldera in the southeast and the
structures. Two resistivity inversion techniques were applied
southwest direction of the Sibayak field.
in order to get the real resistivity.
Figure 4.B shows a block of resistivity at interval depth
Based on 2-D inversion of MT data (Daud et al., 2001), the
between 500-750m. It is found that the anomaly low
resistivity structures model is characterized by a dome-
resistivity zone surrounding the well SBY-4 outside the
shaped resistivity (50-200 m) below the low resistivity
caldera become increase as well as the anomaly in the
zone (less than 10 m). Therefore, the residual resistivity eastern part of the well SBY-1. This phenomenon can be
values are calculated by inversion MAM program using the inferred that the rock alteration zones have gradually
two layer earth model rather than three-layer model in each removed to the north direction. Moreover, the resistivity
of the well SBY-1 and SBY-4. Figure 3 shows a map of contour map in the Figure 3.C and the Figure 3.D has also
compilation of residual resistivity distribution from the wells strengthened the above conclusion. Therefore, it can be
SBY-1 and SBY-4 ranging from interpreted that the thickness of the rock alteration zone
-7 to 13 m. By careful inspection to the map, it is distributed in the eastern part of the well SBY-1 and the rock
obviously recognized that the negative residual resistivity alteration outside the Singkut caldera may be less than 1 km.
anomaly zone (less than -2 m) is mainly located inside the
Singkut caldera, except in the southern part of the area. It By comparing all figures in the Figure 4, it is recognized
could be laterally inferred that the main reservoir may exist that the lowest resistivity anomaly zone which can be
at the northwest of the well SBY-1 or at the northeast of the interpreted as a center of geothermal reservoir is located in
well SBY-4. Moreover, the shape of the negative anomaly the area of faulting systems between Mt.Sibayak and
coincides with the faulting system. Therefore, the lost Mt.Pratektekan. This area has a good agreement with the
circulation zones around the wells SBY-1 and SBY-4 are permeability map reported by Daud et al, (2001) where the
probably reflected by the NW-SE trending faults. The fault high permeability zone (Kh = 2-4 D.m) encountered by well
structures also may control the high permeability in the SBY-5, SBY-6 and SBY-8, is located in the same area.
3
Supriyanto et al.
6. CONCLUSION
358500
B The resistivity structure in the Sibayak geothermal field has
Mt. Sibayak been achieved by inversion program derived from least-
358000
square method. It is concluded that the trend of low
Mt. Pratektekan resistivity zone, in variation respect to the depth, extends to
357500
the area between Mt. Sibayak and Mt. Pratektekan. The zone
has good correlation to the permeability distribution
357000
obtained by integrating previous geophysical data. Therefore,
this study proposes that the best future production target for
356500 SBY-4 SBY-1 the development of the Sibayak area characterized by the
high temperature, high permeability and high well
356000 SBY-9
productivity region is located beneath of the area between
Mt. Sibayak and Mt. Pratektekan.
355500
443500 444000 444500 445000 445500 446000 446500 447000 447500
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
358500
C The authors wish to express their gratitude to the
Mt. Sibayak Management of Pertamina (Indonesia) for using the data and
358000 their permission to publish this paper. The first author
Mt. Pratektekan gratefully acknowledges support from a postgraduate
357500 scholarship awarded by The Monbukagakusho Scholarship,
Japan.
357000
REFERENCES
356500 SBY-4 SBY-1
Sudarman, S., Suroto, Pudyastuti, K. and Aspiyo, S. (1999).
SBY-9
Geothermal Development Progress in Indonesia
356000
Country Update 1995-2000. World Geothermal
Conference, Japan, May and June, 2000. Pages
355500
443500 444000 444500 445000 445500 446000 446500 447000 447500
455-460.
358500
Tagomori, K., Ushijima, K. Kinoshita, Y., (1984). Direct
D Detection of Geothermal Reservoir at Hatchobaru
Mt. Sibayak Geothermal Field by The Mise-a-La-Masse
358000
Measurement. Geothermal Resources Council,
Mt. Pratektekan Transactions, vol. 8. Pages 65-68.
357500
Kauahikaua, J., Mattice, M., and Jackson, D.,(1980). Mise-
357000
a-la-masse mapping of the HGP-A geothermal
reservoir, Hawaii. Geothermal Resources Council,
Transactions, vol 4. Pages 513-516.
356500 SBY-4 SBY-1
Daud, Y., Sudarman, S., Ushijima, K., (2001). Imaging
356000 SBY-9 Reservoir Permeability of The Sibayak Geothermal
Field, Indonesiast Using Geophysical Measurements.
355500 Proceedings 21 Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir
443500 444000 444500 445000 445500 446000 446500 447000 447500 Engineering, Stanford, California. Pages 127-133.
Ohm-m
0 2.5 5 10 15 20 30 45 80 130 180 260 360
Aono, T., Mizunaga, H., Ushijima, K., (2003). Imaging
Fracture during Injection and Production Operations of
Reservoirs by a 4-D Geoelectrical Method. Proceedings
Figure 4: Depth sliced resistivity contour map derived of the 6th SEGJ International Symposium. Tokyo. Pages
from 3-D inversion of the MAM data. (A) 0-250m (B) 281-287
500-750m (C) 1000-1250m (D) 1500-1750m
Daud, Y., Mustopa, E.J., Sudarman, S., Ushijima, K. (2001).
This result also reflects the faults structure (F1 to F4) which 2d Inversion of Magneto-Telluric Data in Sibayak
extends to the Mt. Sibayak. Moreover, as shown in Figure 6, Geothermal Field, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 105th
this area also has a high formation temperature. On the other SEGJ Conference. Pages 230-233.
hand, the position of bottom well SBY-9 at depth 1527 m is
4
Supriyanto et al.
Legend :
359 QpaP Mt. Pintau
Al Altered outcrop
358
F5 Mt. Simpulanangin QhaP
Pratektekan
Hornblende Andesite
Mt. Pratektekan QpaS Simpulanangin
Pyroxene Andesite
Al Singkut Laharic
QhaS SBY-5 QlbS
Breccia
SBY-3
SBY-8 SBY-6
SBY-7
SBY-4
Singkut
QdaS
357 SBY-10 Dacite-Andesite
B
A SBY-9
Normal Fault
C F1
Caldera
F3 QlbS F4 Solfatara/Fumarole
356 Hotspring
F2 Al F1
SBY-2
Well Pad
QdaS Mt. Singkut
SBY-1 Well SBY-1
355 0m Scale
444 445 446 447 448 449
1000 m
359
Mt. Pintau
F6 deg. C
280
F5 Mt. Sibayak 270
358
Sby-3 260
Sby-6 250
240
Mt. Pratektekan 230
Sby-5 Sby-8 220
Northing (km)
210
Sby-10
357 200
Sby-9 190
Sby-7
Sby-4 180
170
160
Sby-2 Sby-1 F4 150
F3 140
356 F2 F1 130
120
110
100
90
Mt. Singkut
355
443 444 445 446 447 448
Easting (km)
5
Supriyanto et al.
Mt. Pintau
? No MAM Data ?
Mt. Sibayak
Mt. Pratektekan
Northing (km)
SBY-10
SBY-4
SBY-1
SBY-2
Mt. Singkut
443 444
Easting (km)
6
Supriyanto et al.
m (above sea
2 Elevation 1384 1384 1468 1468 1384
level).
Temp. at total o
C
4 243 104 272 274 284
depth
o
C 243 104 272 274 302
Max. temp. in
5
depth m (measured
1320 1650 1780 1610 2025
depth)
Production:
6 t/h 18 - 26 23 57
steam
7 Output MWe 2 - 3 3 6
m (above sea
2 Elevation 1384 1384 1384 1337 1468
level).
Temp. at total o
C
4 251 227 260 220 140
depth
o
C 270 266 270 236 170
Max. temp. in
5
depth m (measured
1475 1600 1800 1350 400
depth)
Production:
6 t/h 33 23 36 15 -
steam
7 Output MWe 4 3 4 2 -