Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Highlights
of
1.1 Regulations 41(1), 41A, 41B, 41C and 41D in the Building (Planning)
Regulations and Regulation 90 of the Building (Construction) Regulations.
specify requirements for buildings to be designed in such a way that they exhibit
an acceptable level of performance in the event of fire. Over the years,
Buildings Department and Fire Services Department have issued the following
codes on the performance requirements complying the statutory requirements:
a) the Code of Practice for the Provision of Means of Escape 1996 (the MOE
Code);
b) the Code of Practice for Fire Resisting Construction 1996 (the FRC
Code);
c) the Code of Practice for Means of Access for Firefighting and Rescue 2004
(the MOA Code);
d) the Code of Practice for Minimum Fire Service Installations and
Equipment; and
e) the Code of Practice for Inspection and Testing and Maintenance of
Installations and Equipment.
1.2 In September 2011, Buildings Department issued the Code of Practice for Fire
Safety in Buildings 2011 (the FS Code), which consolidates and replaces the
requirements of the MOE Code (now Part B of the FS Code), the FRC Code
(now Part C of the FS Code) and the MOA Code (now Part D of the FS Code).
1.3 The Statutory Compliance Checking Unit (the SCCU) of ArchSD has
uploaded a soft copy of the FS Code with highlights of the changes onto
ArchSD Intranet at the following URL:
http://asdiis/cmbiis/cmbiis_a/circulars/SCCU_Corner/Code_of_Practice_f
or_Fire_Safety/Code%20of%20Practice%20for%20Fire%20Safety%20in
%20Buildings%202011%20(amendments%20highlighted%20in%20color
).pdf
The SCCU has further provided detailed comparison the FS Code with the
MOE, FRC and MOA together with summary of key points in powerpoint form
and recorded videos of the briefing sessions arranged by Buildings Department
in the following URL:
http://asdiis/cmbiis/cmbiis_a/circulars/SCCU_Corner/Code_of_Practice_f
or_Fire_Safety/Code_of_Practice_for_Fire_Safety.htm
2.1.1 In the FS Code Part A, the term fire resistance period (FRP) in the FRC Code
has been replaced by fire resistance rating (FRR), which means the period of
time that a building element is capable of resisting the action of fire. Moreover,
FRRs are now designated by three terms, to represent the makeup of the
element of construction, i.e. X/Y/Z, where X is stability fire resistance rating
(minutes), Y is integrity fire resistance rating (minutes), and Z is insulation fire
resistance rating (minutes).
2.1.2 The FS Code Table C1 has revised the FRRs and fire compartment limitations
in the FRC Code Table 2, and the FRR criteria for some elements of
construction in the FRC Code Table 3.
2.2.3 The view of Buildings Department was that for such heritage buildings, fire
engineering approach will be appropriate, if it is decided not following the non-
combustibility requirement. However, as member forming the roof or part of
the roof is not an element of construction, there is no concern on stability,
integrity or insulation, whilst the purpose of a fire engineering study, if
performed, is to assess the performance of the roof in fire scenario against these
criteria and therefore not needed. Further information can be obtained from
SEB Guidelines SEBGL-OTH1 Guidelines on the Fire Resisting Construction
for Roof Structures (URL: http://asdiis/sebiis/2k/resource_centre/).
2.3.1 The FS Code Tables E3-E7 (extract as follows) set out minimum dimensions of
different building components for different construction and building materials
for different FRR, which are the same as the FRC Code Tables A-F. There are
no changes on the minimum thickness (including cover for rc construction) for
structural elements (slabs, beams, walls, stairs, columns, etc).
2.3.2.3 The current provision of minimum dimension for hollow-block floors can be
referred to BS 8110-2:1985, which recommends that such type of floor
construction can be treated as solid construction in calculating its fire
resistance by including the contribution of the cement sand or clay blocks
using the effective thickness te given by the following equation:
te h tf
where h is the overall actual thickness of slab;
is the proportion of solid material per unit width of slab;
and tf is the thickness of non-combustible finish.
The following example illustrates the calculation of the effective thickness te:
2.4.1 Table 1 and Table 2 show respectively the recommended thickness and cover of
reinforced concrete wall with different FRRs and different percentages of
reinforcement as stipulated in the FS Code and BS 8110-2: 1985, and they tally
with each other.
2.4.2 SEB has incorporated the above minimum requirements (Table 3) in the SEB
Standard Drawings no. SD/008 and /009 (URL:
http://asdiis/sebiis/2k/MAIN%20DOC/std_draw/index.htm), and Explanatory
Notes on the Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2004 (URL:
http://asdiis/sebiis/2k/MAIN%20DOC/info_paper/upload/cop2004_ep.pdf)
further contains the corresponding discussion on the minimum requirements.
Project officer should note that the above minimum provisions are conservative,
as Eurocode 2 now specifies a smaller minimum thickness (Table 4)
irrespective of the cover and percentage of reinforcement for non-load bearing
partition walls.
BSI (1985), BS 8110-2: 1985 - Structural Use of Concrete: Code of Practice for
Special Circumstances (London: BSI).