Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Wulf D. Hund
1
Cf. Robert Bernasconi: Kant as an Unfamiliar Source of Racism; Sara Eigen, Mark
Larrimore (eds.): The German Invention of Race; Charles W. Mills: Kants Untermen-
schen.
70 Wulf D. Hund
2
Cf. Wulf D. Hund: [Lemma] Rassismus; id.: Negative Societalisation; id.: Rassismus.
3
Cf. Lewis Hanke: Aristotle and the American Indians; David J. Weber: Brbaros.
4
Cf. the illustrations in Gereon Sievernich (ed.): America de Bry, pp. 268 f. and Urs
Bitterli: Die Wilden und die Zivilisierten, p. 351 concerning the background see
John Block Friedman: The Monstrous Races in Medieval Art and Thought; Debra Higgs
Strickland: Saracens, Demons, Jews.
5
Cf. Richard Bernheimer: Wild Men in the Middle Ages; Roger Bartra: Wild Men in the
Looking Glass; Gustav Jahoda: Images of Savages; Kay Anderson: Race and the Crisis
of Humanism.
72 Wulf D. Hund
6
Cf. Max Sebastin Hering Torres: Rassismus in der Vormoderne; Mara Elena Martnez:
Genealogical Fictions.
7
Jean Delumeau: Angst im Abendland; Jorge Caizares-Esguerra: Puritan Conquista-
dors; Fernando Cervantes: The Devil in the New World; Joshua Trachtenberg: The Devil
and the Jews.
8
Julia V. Douthwaite: Homo ferus, p. 178; see Carolus Linnaeus: Systema Natur, pp. 28
f. (Americanus etc., Ferus, Monstrosus), 33 (Troglodytes).
9
Although the Enlightenment and racism have for a long time been constructed as op-
posites, there are a number of relevant contributions on their interrelations now cf.
among others Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze (ed.): Race and the Enlightenment; Gudrun
Hentges: Schattenseiten der Aufklrung; Harold E. Pagliaro (ed.): Racism in the Eight-
eenth Century; Pierre Pluchon: Ngres et Juifs au XVIIIe sicle; Richard H. Popkin: The
Philosophical Basis of Eighteenth-Century Racism; Kaija Tiainen-Anttila: The Problem
of Humanity.
10
Immanuel Kant: Immanuel Kants physische Geographie, p. 315 (Pliny) and 316
(monkey tail) all Kant quotations have been translated into English in accordance
with the relevant German editions AA and WW. I wish to thank Nadine Anumba for
the translation of my essay and Silvana Jenkins for her precise reading of the text.
It must come from Europe 73
11
Immanuel Kant: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, p. 671; on Girtanner, see
among others Hans-Peter Trnkle: Der rhmlich bekannte philosophische Arzt und
politische Schriftsteller Hofrath Christoph Girtanner (for his biography); Timothy
Lenoir: Kant, Blumenbach, and Vital Materialism in German Biology, pp. 9699.
12
Christoph Girtanner: Ueber das Kantische Prinzip fr die Naturgeschichte, pp. 254
268 (tailed humans), 275281 (sex with monkeys); the following quotations are on
pp. 266 f. (tail humans), 279 f. (monsters).
13
Immanuel Kant: Immanuel Kants physische Geographie, p. 313 (Mulattoes); id.: Ent-
wrfe zu dem Colleg ber Anthropologie, p. 878 (mix); id.: Reflexionen zur Anthro-
pologie, p. 598 (half-breeds) Giverno (ibid., p. 601) serves as proof of this thesis:
a bastard from a half-breed of a Negro with an American Indian as father and a Negro
and a mulatto as mother who is said to be so malicious that one chases off their
parents when one knows that they have copulated.
14
Robert Ian Moore: The Formation of a Persecuting Society, p. 95; for the following
see Rainer Walz: Der vormoderne Antisemitismus, pp. 740 f. (limpieza and breast-
feeding); Mara Elena Martnez: Genealogical Fictions, pp. 56, 138 (native or black
wet nurses in Creole families), 159 (natal alienation).
74 Wulf D. Hund
15
Jorge Caizares-Esguerra: Puritan Conquistadors, p. 27.
16
Cf. Immanuel Kant: Immanuel Kants physische Geographie, p. 313 (jump-backwards
children); see also Christoph Girtanner: Ueber das Kantische Prinzip fr die
Naturgeschichte, pp. 60 ff., who devotes several pages to the enumeration of the dif-
ferent mixtures. On the sistema de castas, see Ilona Katzew: Casta Painting.
17
Cf. David M. Goldenberg: The Curse of Ham; Stephen R. Haynes: Noahs Curse; John-
son, Sylvester A.: The Myth of Ham in Nineteenth-Century American Christianity;
David M. Whitford: The Curse of Ham in the Early Modern Era.
18
See Joshua Trachtenberg: The Devil and the Jews. Such ideological operations have
rightly been described as a racist doctrine: The curses on Jews for the killing of
Christ and on blacks for the sin of Ham could serve as supernaturalist equivalent of
biological determinism for those seeking to deny humanity to a stigmatized group
It must come from Europe 75
holders still develop the story further in the eighteenth (and nineteenth)
century, Kant rejects it as a legend. The black colour is not a sign
of the curse but an expression of the heat of the climate.19 The di-
chotomy of the chosen and the cursed seems to have been overcome. In
actual fact, however, it has migrated to anthropology. There, its revenant
announces the historico-philosophical message of the white races cho-
senness.
In his anthropology, Kant concludes that the human being has a charac-
ter which he himself creates by being capable of perfecting himself
according to ends which he himself adopts.20
These thoughts are committed to a humanism of the species: With
all other animals, the individual reaches its destiny; with humans only
the species [reaches] the entire destiny of human nature. In this respect
then, one must consider the human species as a whole, and it is not
about whether humans of a certain race, e.g. that of whites [. . . ] with
the exclusion of the Negroes or Americans are blessed with this advan-
tage, [. . . ] hence not about whether all humans progress, but whether they
progress as a whole; some may well stay behind.
In all the progress of humankind is staged according to a script of
social discrimination.21 The leading parts are played by rich white men.
The supporting roles are reserved for the weaker sex, the lower classes
and the inferior races. Woman [i]n the raw state of nature is a domes-
tic animal and can only develop her weaknesses, called feminini-
ties, in civilised times and dependence on the man. The skillfulness
[. . . ] of the human species must be achieved by means of inequality
anyway, as many take care of the necessities while a few, provided
with leisure, develop science and art. Thus humanity is at its great-
est perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians already have
a lesser talent. The Negroes are much lower, and lowest of all is a part of
the American peoples.22
When the Kantian human gets down to self-development, this work
is divided by the big three of social discrimination: gender, class and
race.
Furthermore, humans have to surmount the huge obstacle of their
supposedly innate laziness. For in Kant, it is not only the savage, who
loves his lazy independence, not only the humans in the hottest zone,
thus the Negro or the inhabitants of the Moluccas, who are lazy
Tartars, Hottentots, Turks, Spaniards or noble peoples are lazy,
too. And laziness not only refers to bodily but also mental indolence.
The fainthearted way of thinking which awaits external help as well as
lazy philosophy and even the lazy reason are idle, so that the only
general conclusion left is the insight that the human being is lazy by
nature.23
For the human being to work his way up and ascend from the low-
est level [. . . ] to the highest level of humanity under such conditions, na-
ture has not relied upon his drive for action.24 It is rather the antago-
nism of antisocial sociality which cures humans of their tendency to-
wards laziness and through ambition, imperiousness or avarice incites
them to throw themselves into labour and arduousness.25 Moreover,
his reason tells him to patiently shoulder the toil which he hates.
Driven in such a way, he leaves the futile state of the savages behind
and moves through the stages of the hunters and gatherers, shepherds,
farmers and civil society towards perfection.
This conception of progress has class-specific undertones. Kant, who
etymologically connects the terms rabble and idleness, distrusts the
22
Immanuel Kant: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, p. 649 (woman etc.), id.:
Kritik der Urteilskraft, p. 554 (human species etc.), id.: Immanuel Kants physische
Geographie, p. 316 (races).
23
Immanuel Kant: Entwrfe zu dem Colleg ber Anthropologie, p. 878; for the preced-
ing see ibid., pp. 890 (savages), 877 (lazy independence), 882 (Spaniards), 856
(noble peoples); id.: Immanuel Kants physische Geographie, pp. 316 (hottest zone),
389 (Moluccas), 402 (Tartars), 408 (Hottentots), 406 (Turks); id.: Von den ver-
schiedenen Rassen der Menschen, p. 23 (Negro); id.: Die Religion innerhalb der Gren-
zen der bloen Vernunft, p. 709 (fainthearted way of thinking), id.: Trume eines Geis-
tersehers, p. 939 (philosophy), id.: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 596, 654 (reason).
24
Immanuel Kant: Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbrgerlicher Absicht,
pp. 43 (highest level), 49 (work his way up); id.: ber den Gebrauch teleologischer
Prinzipien in der Philosophie, p. 158 (drive).
25
Immanuel Kant: Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbrgerlicher Absicht,
pp. 37 ff.; for the following see ibid., p. 44 (state of the savages), id.: Mutmalicher
Anfang der Menschengeschichte, pp. 92 (reason etc.), 96 f. (stages).
It must come from Europe 77
populace with its tendency to enjoy and aversion to working for it.
He is, however, ready to make a racist concession to the lower classes.
He follows David Humes idea of a difference between the races which
is supposed to exist in the fact that coloureds, especially blacks, do not
produce any culture, whereas among the whites, there are always some
who swing themselves up from the lowest rabble and gain a reputation in
the world through excellent gifts.26
The theory of the progress of humanity through stages of socio-
economic development is the historico-philosophical foundation of mod-
ern racism. Non-culturalist race theories do not exist. From Linns first
classification attempt onwards, the discussion, now increasingly held
in racial terms, combines the evaluative description of body, mind and
beauty to form an integrated hierarchical concept of the differentiation
between different categories of humans.
This involves the willingness to construct races, at least in theory, as
cross-class categories. In the sixteenth century, it is founded through the
inclusion of the lower classes in colonial land seizure, genocidal settle-
ment policies and a plantation economy based on slavery. Moreover, it is
prepared linguistically as well as ideologically through their admission
to popular stagings of a contrast between black and white skin in Re-
naissance theatre. In the seventeenth century, science combines the views
on human groups of different skin colours with notions of cultural and
intellectual superiority. In the eighteenth century, this concept is system-
atised, synchronised with climate theoretical reflections on the relation-
ship between environment and culture as well as historico-philosophical
ideas about the progress of humanity and finally incorporated in the race
theory formulated by Kant and others.
While progress thought and race theory develop in parallel, they are
systematically interwoven: Progress has a skin colour. It is seen as an
expression of the cultural abilities of the white race. The coloured races,
in contrast, are seen to remain on the lower levels of societal develop-
ment. There is no agreement on whether they can develop further under
the guidance and with the help of Europeans. Sceptical minds rather sup-
pose that they have lost their way into evolutionary impasses from which
there is no escape.
26
Immanuel Kant: ber das Gefhl des Schnen und Erhabenen, p. 880; for the preced-
ing see id.: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, p. 658 (rabble, idler); id.: Der
Streit der Fakultten, p. 293 (populace etc.); for the racism in Hume and the Scottish
moral philosophy cf. Wulf D. Hund: Negative Societalisation, pp. 66 ff., for the follow-
ing see id.: Die weie Norm and especially Gary Taylor: Buying Whiteness.
78 Wulf D. Hund
At any rate, Kant declares that [m]any peoples do not advance fur-
ther by themselves. Development is only driven by the white race.
Therefore, it is in the Occident where we must search for the contin-
uous progress of the human species towards perfection and from where
progress will spread on earth.27
27
Immanuel Kant: Entwrfe zu dem Colleg ber Anthropologie, p. 789.
28
With regard to racism in Kant, the topic Kant and the races has been discussed the
most thoroughly; from the extensive literature, cf. among others Bruce Baum: The Rise
and Fall of the Caucasian Race, esp. pp. 68 ff.; Robert Bernasconi: Kant as an Unfamil-
iar Source of Racism; id.: Who Invented the Concept of Race?; David Bindman: Ape to
Apollo, esp. pp. 151 ff.; Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze: The Colour of Reason; John Gas-
coigne: The German Enlightenment and the Pacific; Gudrun Hentges, Schattenseiten
der Aufklrung, esp. pp. 90 ff. and 209 ff.; Thomas E. Hill jr., Bernard Boxill: Kant
and Race; Wulf D. Hund: Im Schatten des Glcks; Pauline Kleingeld: Kants Second
Thoughts on Race; Raphal Lagier: Les Races humaines selon Kant; Marc Larrimore:
Sublime Waste; Rudolf Malter: Der Rassebegriff in Kants Anthropologie; Thomas A.
McCarthy: On the Way to a World Republic?; Charles W. Mills: Kants Untermen-
schen; Joseph Pugliese: Indigeneity and the Racial Topography of Kants Analytic
of the Sublime; Tsenay Serequeberhan: Eurocentrism in Philosophy; Susan M. Shell:
Kants Conception of a Human Race; Alex Sutter: Kant und die Wilden; John H.
Zammito: Policing Polygeneticism in Germany.
It must come from Europe 79
29
Cf. Wulf D. Hund: Die weie Norm, p. 187.
30
Georges-Louis Leclerc Comte de Buffon: Histoire naturelle, gnrale et particulire,
p. 437, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach: Beytrge zur Naturgeschichte, p. 81, Immanuel
Kant: ber den Gebrauch teleologischer Prinzipien in der Philosophie, p. 144; for the
following cf. ibid., p. 142 (ideas) and id.: Von den verschiedenen Rassen der Men-
schen, p. 25 (prejudice).
31
Immanuel Kant: Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels, p. 387; that
Greenlanders and Hottentots were racist stereotypes became apparent later, when Kant
attributed timidity, laziness and superstition to one of the groups, imputed lazi-
ness to the other as well and accused the latter of being extremely unclean, of smearing
themselves with cow dung and urine and of eating their numerous lice cf. id.: Im-
manuel Kants physische Geographie, p. 317 (Greenlanders), 408 (Hottentots).
32
When Kant wrote down this extraterrestrial comparison, there was an extensive discus-
sion about the relationship between apes and humans. Africans were often brought close
to apes cf. Raymond Corby: The Metaphysics of Apes, pp. 3659; Kaija Tiainen-
Anttila: The Problem of Humanity, pp. 103111. Greenlanders and Hottentots at
that time were common stereotypes to designate people in Greenland and the south
of Africa who were classified as primitive cf. Thomas Nutz: Varietten des Men-
schengeschlechts, pp. 300 ff.
80 Wulf D. Hund
Even before Kant develops his race theory, philosophy and arrogance
have combined to form its culturalist basis. Blacks do not have any
talents according to it and are worlds apart from whites: the differ-
ence between these two human kinds [. . . ] appears to be as big in view
of the mental faculties as when judged by colour.33 The combination
of skin and faculties rather openly refers to the connection between body
and mind which is conjured up in the race sciences from Linn onwards
and which Kant uses as the basis of his theoretical reflections on race as
well.
His first considerations still carry a considerable aesthetic load. The
racial classification of 1775/77 makes use of a system of skin colours
which is not yet complete. The division of humanity into four races
starts from the assumption of two clearly discernible basic races, the
race of the whites and the Negro race, which is characterized by its
black colour. The Hunnish (Mongolian or Kalmuckian) race and the
Hindu or Hindustani race follow. While the latter can supposedly be
identified by its skin colour again, specified as olive yellow, the former
is distinguished by physiognomic traits.34
The reference to blinking eyes and a flattened nose in the de-
scription of Mongols and Kalmucks already suggests an aesthetic preju-
dice which is taken to the fullest with regard to the humans called Ne-
groes: They are said to have a thick turned-up nose and thick lips [liter-
ally: sausage lips]. The disdain this shows is intensified further through
the conviction that all Negroes stink and are lazy, soft and trifling.
When Kant revises and systematises his race concept in 1785, a num-
ber of assumptions and ascriptions are removed. Moreover, Kant now
takes an unequivocal monogenetic position and declares that there are
no different species of humans.35 From this, scholars have wrongly
concluded that [i]n Kants later years [. . . ] the hierarchical [. . . ] con-
cept of race disappears in his published writings.36 For Kant still per-
ceives the odour of Negroes in 1785, and he continues to arrange the
races by their cultural abilities. Three years later, in his argument with
Georg Forster, this finds expression in his assertion that the inhabitants
of America are unfit for any culture and that this race stands far
33
Immanuel Kant: Beobachtungen ber das Gefhl des Schnen und Erhabenen, p. 880.
34
Immanuel Kant: Von den verschiedenen Rassen der Menschen, pp. 16 (basic races),
14 (whites, Negroes), 24 (black colour), 14 (Hunnish and Hindustani race), 16
(physiognomy, olive yellow); for the following see pp. 21 (eyes, nose), 22 (thick
lips, odour).
35
Immanuel Kant: Bestimmung des Begriffs einer Menschenrasse, p. 75.
36
Sankar Muthu: Enlightenment Against Empire, p. 183.
It must come from Europe 81
below the Negro [. . . ], who holds the lowest of all remaining levels by
which we have designated the different races.37
Kants skin colours are taxonomic criteria and cultural stigmata
rolled into one. The division into whites, yellows, blacks and
copper reds is at the same time a description for hierarchically ordered
human capacities for culture. The uneven distribution of these capacities
among the races is not claimed to have always existed. Rather, the first
human phylum, according to Kant, had various germs and natural pre-
dispositions, which in the course of early human history were either
unfolded or restrained. In the development of races, however, the orig-
inal germs of the whole species are held to evolve according to different
environmental conditions. The racial characteristics which thus come into
being then become fixed and obliterate [. . . ] all the remaining germs.38
Races, therefore, are not only external peculiarities but the im-
mutable fixing of the originally universal human capacity for develop-
ment. Together with their differences in skin colour, races also pass on
dissimilar cultural capabilities:
1) The people of the Americans dont embrace culture. It has no
motivating force, for it lacks affect and passion. They [. . . ] do not take
care of anything either and are lazy. 2) The race of the Negroes [. . . ] is
completely the opposite [. . . ]; they are full of affect and passion, [. . . ]
can be cultivated but only as servants, that is they can be trained [. . . ].
3) The Hindus [. . . ] can [. . . ] be cultivated to the highest degree but only
in the arts and not in the sciences. They never achieve the level of ab-
stract concepts, [. . . ] always stay the way they are; they never go further,
though they started to cultivate themselves much earlier. 4) The race of
the whites contains all motivating forces and talents in itself [. . . ]. When-
ever revolutions occurred, they were always brought about by whites, and
the Hindus, Americans, Negroes never had a part in it.39
37
Immanuel Kant: Bestimmung des Begriffs einer Menschenrasse, p. 79 (odour), id.:
ber den Gebrauch teleologischer Prinzipien in der Philosophie, p. 159 f. (America).
38
Immanuel Kant: Von den verschiedenen Rassen der Menschen, pp. 25 (human phy-
lum), 19 (germs etc.); id.: Bestimmung des Begriffs einer Menschenrasse, p. 82
(obliterate); for the racist consequences of Kants germ theory cf. among others
Thomas McCarthy: On the Way to a World Republic?, pp. 228, 231: It seems that
Kants chief motivation in developing this theory of race was to defend monogenesis
[. . . ]. The costs of doing so via a theory of biologically based racial differentiation
were [. . . ] much too high. [. . . ] [T]he subdivision of the races for biological purposes
is linked with fateful differences at the level of mental powers and culture.
39
Immanuel Kant: Die Vorlesung des Wintersemesters 1781/82 [?], pp. 1187 f.; for the
preceding see id.: Bestimmung des Begriffs einer Menschenrasse, pp. 67 f. (whites
etc.).
82 Wulf D. Hund
Kant writes little but pertinently about the subject Gypsies.40 He prob-
ably acquired at least part of his knowledge on it from conversations with
his friend Christian Jakob Kraus.41 This includes the conviction that Gyp-
sies stem from India, their social classification as pariahs, the use of their
skin colour as proof of the immutability of races and the reference to their
nomadic lifestyle.42
Kant employs these ideas to synchronise the Gypsy question with the
race question. This is a thoroughly modern operation and shows that he
was a supporter of the new race-oriented Gypsy stereotype, based on a
decisive paradigmatic change. The conception it supersedes was sum-
marised in the entry Ziegeuner [Gypsies] from Zedlers Universal En-
cyclopaedia as late as in 1749. The article states that in the fifteenth cen-
tury, wandering strangers appeared in Europe. However, they either left
again or disappeared into the local rabble. The text concludes that these
Gypsies are nothing but gathered wicked riffraff who do not want to work
but turn idleness, stealing, whoring, gorging, boozing, playing and so on
into a profession.43
This diagnosis of a socially nonconformist character of the Gypsy
is reinforced through the denunciation of two classic ascriptions of
strangeness, appearance and language, as mere pretence. The dark colour
is alleged to be an artificial trait smeared on their skin to deceive and
conceal their true identity. The supposedly incomprehensible language is
claimed to be nothing but a collusive jargon which both serves to appear
strange as well as interesting and enables them to communicate without
being understood by others.
Until the middle of the eighteenth century, the Gypsy stereotype de-
veloped into a category which serves to identify socially nonconformist
behaviour. The accusations of vagabondage and statelessness, which re-
cur again and again and are strained intensely in Zedler, are part of this.
The mere masses of people without a permanent home and subordination
40
There are only a few contributions on the topic Kant and the Gypsies cf. Wulf
D. Hund: Das Zigeuner-Gen; Kurt Rttgers: Kants Zigeuner Rttgers suggests that
Kant kept quiet about (p. 84) the Gypsies, but his diagnosis of a suppression of
knowledge (p. 63) is missing Kants most important statement on the subject.
41
Cf. Werner Stark: Kant und Kraus; Kurt Rttgers: Kants Zigeuner.
42
Cf. Christian Jakob Kraus, quoted in Kurt Rttgers: Kants Kollege und seine
ungeschriebene Schrift ber die Zigeuner, pp. 56 f., 58.
43
[Johann Heinrich Zedler]: Ziegeuner, p. 525; for the following see ibid., pp. 525 f. (skin
colour, language), 538 f. (vagabonds, stray riffraff); see also Wulf D. Hund: Das
Zigeuner-Gen, pp. 23 ff.; Iris Wigger: Ein eigenartiges Volk, pp. 39 f.
It must come from Europe 83
44
Cf. Fernand Braudel: Sozialgeschichte des 15.18. Jahrhunderts. Der Handel.
Mnchen: Kindler 1990, pp. 564 ff.
45
Cf. Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb Grellmann: Die Zigeuner; see Katrin Ufen: Aus Zigeunern
Menschen machen.
46
Letter by Christian Jakob Kraus from 28 December 1784, quoted in Kurt Rttgers:
Kants Kollege und seine ungeschriebene Schrift ber die Zigeuner, p. 57; the following
statements can be found ibid., pp. 63, 55.
47
Immanuel Kant: Von den verschiedenen Rassen der Menschen, pp. 24 (olive yellow),
14 f. (Hindustani race) and id.: Bestimmung des Begriffs einer Menschenrasse, p. 81
(Gypsies etc.).
84 Wulf D. Hund
race) do not get off lightly. In Kants hierarchy of human races, the
boundary between creative and uncreative races runs between whites
and coloureds, and [t]he Asian nations have reached a standstill where
the development of their perfections had to come from concepts and not
merely from intuitions. Prefiguring the Aryan myth, Kant thus supposes
that their skills originated from a northern race.48 Moreover, he adds
class-specific arguments to race-related discrimination. Gypsies are not
only claimed to stem from India but also from a socially degraded con-
dition. They are said to be descendents of pariahs and come from the
scum of the earth.
Against such a background, Kant discusses the relationship between
external racial features and cultural capacities. In this case, the outward
appearance is the Indian skin colour, which the Gypsies have kept
even though they have been in Europe for centuries. This skin colour,
however, is merely a sign of the specific development of original predis-
positions. They existed as possibilities in the first humans, and then de-
veloped in relation to the world regions in which their descendents came,
thus contributing to the formation of different races. Fixed in this way,
the predispositions became immutable hereditary traits.49
Among these traits, according to Kant, is not only outward appear-
ance but also the unequal capacity for culture. This capacity for culture
is maintained to be as immutable as skin colour. In order to underline
this, the philosopher points to members of those races which were driven
from a warm to a cold climate. Their descendents, Kant claims, did not
lose their original characteristics. As proof, he cites the Creole Negroes
in America and the Indians who are called Gypsies in Europe: They
have never been able to bring about a type that would be fit for local
farmers or manual labourers. If one allows them to act freely, he asserts,
they remain good-for-nothings, among whom none shows any signs of
that which one could properly call work.
48
Immanuel Kant: Reflexionen zur Anthropologie, p. 597; for the following see id.: Die
Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloen Vernunft, p. 804 (pariahs).
49
Cf. Immanuel Kant: ber den Gebrauch teleologischer Prinzipien in der Philosophie,
pp. 155 (skin colour), 148 (fixing of race differences); the following quotations can
be found ibid., pp. 157 (farmers, labour), 158 (drive to activity), 159 (America).
Christoph Girtanner: Ueber das Kantische Prinzip fr die Naturgeschichte, p. 119, in
full accordance with Kant, cited the Gypsies as proof of the halt of history which is
contained in the race concept they serve as evidence [. . . ] that all later transplanta-
tions and relocations to another climate cannot change a race once it has developed.
On Kants germ theory, which asserts that the original human phylum contained the
capacity for diverse developments as the potential to adapt to different environments,
cf. Susan Meld Shell: The Embodiment of Reason, pp. 194 ff.
It must come from Europe 85
50
Cf. Raphal Lagier: Les Races humaines selon Kant, pp. 128 ff.
86 Wulf D. Hund
devaluation in relation with them.51 The Turks, for instance, are treated
similarly; they belong to the race of whites but are nonetheless bar-
barians (which is why they cannot achieve civil liberty) and members of
the oriental peoples (who are not able to perfect themselves). Further-
more, like the Jews, they are characterised by religious arrogance and
believe that all others are cursed.52
The (barbarous) inability to attain true liberty as well as the (oriental)
inability to perfect themselves are at least as suspicion also applied
to Jews. Kant once even goes so far as to mention them (together with
Gypsies and the Chinese) in the context of his Asian race.53 What is
meant is made clear by Christoph Girtanner when he extensively draws
on Kant verbatim in his reflections on the immutability of human races:
the Gypsies [. . . ] have not yet become farmers and manual labourers
[. . . ] in almost four hundred years now; of the Negroes [. . . ] in England
and America, not a single one [. . . does] a business [. . . ] which one could
properly call work; the Jews, a type of white humans habituated to the
oriental clime, even now in Europe and notwithstanding their long stay
among us, remain disinclined to all real work and appear to be wholly
incapable of it.54
According to an account by the theologian Johann Friedrich Abegg,
Kant correspondingly argues in one of his table talks that Jews are vam-
pires of society and cannot, as long as the Jews are Jews and get
circumcised, become useful members of civil society.55 From Kants
own hand, this reads only a little more moderately. He accuses Jews of
busy idleness and declares them to be a nation of cheaters and mer-
chants, who belong to the non-producing members of society.56
51
The topic Kant and the Jews has been examined from different perspectives cf.
among others Klaus L. Berghahn: Grenzen der Toleranz; Micha Brumlik: Deutscher
Geist und Judenha; Michael Mack: German Idealism and the Jew; Paul Lawrence
Rose: Revolutionary Antisemitism in Germany from Kant to Wagner; Bettina
Stangneth: Antisemitische und antijudaistische Motive bei Immanuel Kant?
52
Immanuel Kant: Die Vorlesung des Wintersemesters 1781/82 [?], pp. 1188 (whites),
1181 (oriental); id.: Reflexionen zur Anthropologie, pp. 595 f. (barbarians), 590
(cursed); id.: Bemerkungen zu den Beobachtungen ber das Gefhl des Schnen und
Erhabenen, p. 115 (religious arrogance).
53
Cf. Immanuel Kant: Entwrfe zu dem Colleg ber Anthropologie, p. 878.
54
Christoph Girtanner: Ueber das Kantische Prinzip fr die Naturgeschichte, p. 157 (like
Kant, Girtanner sees Gypsies as members of the olive-yellow race, ibid., p. 76, Ne-
groes as members of the black race, ibid., p. 74, and Jews as members of the white
race, ibid., p. 70).
55
Johann Friedrich Abegg: Reisetagebuch von 1798, p. 190; cf. Rudolf Malter: Kants
Tischgesellschaft nach dem Bericht von Johann Friedrich Abegg.
56
Immanuel Kant: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, p. 438 (idleness) as well
as id.: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (AA), pp. 205 f. (this long antisemitic
It must come from Europe 87
The diagnosis which the philosophy of progress implies, that real hu-
mans are only those who develop through their own work, which has been
synchronised with the hierarchy of race theory through the culturalist-
racist discrimination of vagabonding Gypsies, lazy Negroes and In-
dians unfit for work, makes the unproductive Jews appear in a flat light
despite their whiteness. In addition, Kant calls Jews [t]he Palestinians
who live among us in this context and thereby turns them into members
of a foreign nation, whose home he situates in the Orient.
Jews are white in Kants race theory, but culturalist arguments sep-
arate them from whites and maintain that they can only rank among
them when they renounce their cultural identity. On the one hand, Kant
asserts what will considerably later be integrated into race theory, that is,
the suspicion that Jews are not quite white or not white enough.57 On the
other hand, he demonstrates the flexibility of a race theory which appears
naturalist by opening the seemingly clear boundary between the races in
a culturalist manner.58
Theoretically, this does not only hold good for groups constructed as
in-between peoples, such as the Jews, but also for American Indians, for
example, who are clearly conceptualised as a single race. Kants contem-
porary Thomas Jefferson, for instance, makes extensive use of this way
of race thinking. He judges blacks to be incompatible with whites,
who are his yardstick, whereas reds are said to have good prospects of
merging into them. Therefore, blacks should only be freed from slavery
provided that one can completely separate them from whites. Reds, in
contrast, are called upon to adopt the lifestyle of whites and in return
enjoy being allowed to mix with them. If they refuse to do so, they are
footnote has been omitted in the WW edition without comment); for the following cf.
ibid. (Palestinians) at the same time, Kant talks about the futile plan to moralise
this people with regard to the point of deceit and honesty (ibid.) and thus expresses
fundamental scepticism about the policy of the emancipation of the Jews.
57
Cf. Karen Brodkin: How Jews Became White Folks and Eric L. Goldstein: The Price
of Whiteness; for the inbetweenness mentioned in the following, see also David R.
Roediger: Working Toward Whiteness, esp. pp. 50 ff., 70 ff., 119 ff.
58
In addition, Kant was not averse to letting the difference between Jews and other
whites, which he based on culturalist arguments, hold good with respect to phys-
iognomy as well. This was not unusual among his enlightened contemporaries. Even
Johann Friedrich Blumenbach opined that the Jewish race [. . . ] can easily be recog-
nized everywhere and that the nation of the Jews [. . . ], under every climate, remain
the same as far as the fundamental configuration of the face goes (quoted in Jonathan
M. Hess: Jewish Emancipation and the Politics of Race, p. 206). Kant himself, when
he was not satisfied with a portrait of him that a Jewish artist had painted, quoted a
good connoisseur of paintings with the words: a Jew always paints another Jew,
whose nose he recreates (Immanuel Kant: Brief an Carl Leonhard Reinhold vom 12.
5. 1789).
88 Wulf D. Hund
also referred to the logic of the racially tinged theory of progress they
will be chased by whites and their civilisation and have to perish.59
The racially white but culturally suspicious Jews are given a simi-
lar option: the euthanasia of Judaism.60 In order to achieve it, Judaism
has to become a religion and engage in the formation of a close re-
lationship with Christianity. Up to now, Judaism is not a religion but
merely an association of people under political laws who belong to
a special tribe. Therefore, Jews constitute only a political, not an ethi-
cal community.61
By Kants standards, this is a cultural degradation of Judaism. As re-
ligion can ultimately only be based on reason and only in this way make
moral behaviour possible, Jews are both unrepentant and unreasonable.
Moreover, as they conceive their God as a mere political sovereign and
at the same time wait for the re-establishment of their merely worldly
state without moralising themselves, their superstition and their usu-
rious spirit enable the outwitting of the nations among which they
live.
In combination with the alleged Jewish hope to one day rule over
all nations (goyim), this results in the image of a people which despite
its whiteness, is limited orientally. This not only fails to perfect itself
but instead maintains itself parasitically and above all strives for world
domination. The predominantly culturalist nature of this construct shows
that even during the development of the race paradigm, racism is not
restricted to the biological stigmatisation of others which this paradigm
involves.
59
Cf. Thomas Jefferson: Notes on the State of Virginia, who with respect to African slaves
explains that their emancipation is only possible if they can at the same time be brought
beyond the reach of mixture (p. 270). In regard to American Indians, he states that
they will in time either incorporate with us as citizens of the United States, or remove
beyond the Mississippi (id.: Letter to Governor William H. Harrison, p. 1118).
60
Immanuel Kant: Der Streit der Fakultten, p. 321; by euthanasia, Kant understands a
gentle death and among other things metaphorically speaks of the euthanasia [. . . ]
of all morals (id.: Die Metaphysik der Sitten, p. 506) or the euthanasia of pure reason
(id.: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, p. 401). The remark that euthanasia at that time was
seen as a self-determined as well as happy way of dying (cf. Kurt Flasch: Was hie
bei Kant Euthanasie des Judentums?, pp. 358 ff.) misses the heart of the problem: the
demand for cultural self-abandonment. The shock of this metaphor consists in the
fact that it is about death (Klaus J. Berghahn: Grenzen der Toleranz, p. 220).
61
Immanuel Kant: Vorarbeiten zum Streit der Fakultten, p. 441 (religion, formation
of a close relationship); id.: Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloen Vernunft,
pp. 790 f. (association etc.); for the following see ibid., pp. 772 (political sovereign),
790 (worldly state); id.: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, pp. 205 f. (su-
perstition, usurious spirit); id.: Vorarbeiten zur Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der
bloen Vernunft, p. 112 (goyim).
It must come from Europe 89
62
Immanuel Kant: ber Pdagogik, p. 729.
63
Immanuel Kant: Der Streit der Fakultten, p. 293.
64
Immanuel Kant: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, p. 553; the pertinent com-
parison between lhomme Sauvage et lhomme polic is drawn in Jean-Jacques
Rousseau: Discours sur lorigine et les fondemens de lingalit parmi les hommes,
pp. 192 f.; see also Bernard R. Boxill: Rousseau, Natural Man, and Race; Francis Moran
III: Between Primates and Primitives.
90 Wulf D. Hund
been just as good to have this island populated with happy sheep and
cattle as with human beings who are happy with mere pleasure.65
According to Kant, the inhabitants of Otaheite remain children all
their lives.66 They are thus relegated to the early times of humanity and
constructed as humans without history. Since they do not advance, they
fail to follow their actual vocation as humans. Concomitantly, they serve
as a deterring example of what happens when humans give in to their
latent laziness and shirk their duty to develop themselves.
In this sense, Kant uses Otaheite to denounce all criticism of alien-
ation, which he decries as empty longing and the shadowy image of
[. . . ] the Golden Age that promises contentment with the mere sat-
isfaction of natural needs, the complete equality of human beings and
everlasting peace. To Kant, this is nothing but the imagination of the
pure enjoyment of a carefree life, dreamt away in laziness or trifled away
in childish play; a longing which makes [. . . ] voyages to the South Sea
Islands so attractive.67
The South Sea Islands and their chimera Otaheite on the one hand
serve as a distorted panorama. Against this background, Kant stages his
ontology of a human nature that develops through alienated labour. The
coercion this involves is legitimised with reference to the sheepish nature
of those who do not want to force themselves. On the other hand, this
comparison is racialised and made the crux of the Kantian race theory.
This theory in fact knows only one race which is able to fully develop the
human powers: white Europeans. According to Kant, all human history
certainly goes [back] to the race of whites only. This is even truer for
the future: It must come from Europe.
The optimistic version of this projection of the future of humanity is
the Enlightenment programme of progress. Human history perfects itself
in Europe and through Europeans and this part of the world will prob-
65
Immanuel Kant: Rezension zu Johann Gottfried Herders Ideen, p. 805; see Vanessa Ag-
new: Pacific Island Encounters and the German Invention of Race; Harry Liebersohn:
The Travelers World.
66
Immanuel Kant: ber Pdagogik, p. 712. Part of the interrelationship between different
types of discrimination in this context is the comparison with groups who are alleged to
have similar dispositions. It results in such enumerations as children, savages, women
(id.: Reflexionen zur Anthropologie, p. 101), children, the common people, savages
(id.: Entwrfe zu dem Kolleg ber Anthropologie, p. 693) or children, savages, stupid
people (id.: Reflexionen zur Metaphysik, p. 713).
67
Immanuel Kant: Mutmalicher Anfang der Menschengeschichte, pp. 100 f.; the fol-
lowing quotations are from id.: Entwrfe zu dem Colleg ber Anthropologie, pp. 879
(history), 781 (Europe).
It must come from Europe 91
ably one day give laws to all others.68 What is not certain, however, is if
the rest of the world will be able to follow them. Therefore, there is also
a pessimistic variant of the theory of progress. Whites do not appear as
patriarchal teachers of coloureds in it but nolens volens assume the role
of Nemesis, who has to tell the other races that they have missed their
vocation as humans by their own fault.
Since Tahiti is an island, Kant considers it an ideal setting for this
variant of human history. He symbolically lets the island sink in the sea:
Humans have such a drive to perfect themselves that they even consider
a people which has finished its development and merely enjoys itself to be
superfluous and think that the world would lose nothing if Otaheite went
down.69 The idea of races that are doomed to extinction, which would be
supported by supposed natural laws through social Darwinism, is in fact
already included in the formation of race theory. From the start, it argues
in such a hierarchical manner that the identification of historical progress
and white supremacy contains the possibility that the others vanish. Kant
put this into words at least as a note: All races will become exterminated
[. . . ], except for the whites.
References
(All quotations from non-English sources have been translated. Emphases in the
originals are not included. All italics are mine).
Abegg, Johann Friedrich: Reisetagebuch von 1798. Eds. Walter and Jolanda
Abegg in cooperation with Zwi Batscha. Frankfurt: Insel 1976.
Agnew, Vanessa: Pacific Island Encounters and the German Invention of Race. In:
Islands in History and Representation, ed. by Rod Edmond, Vanessa Smith.
London etc.: Routledge 2003, pp. 8194.
Anderson, Kay: Race and the Crisis of Humanism. London etc.: Routledge 2007.
Barkhaus, Annette: Rasse Zur Genese eines spezifisch neuzeitlichen Ord-
nungsbegriffs. In: Die Ordnung der Kulturen. Zur Konstruktion ethnischer,
nationaler und zivilisatorischer Differenzen 17501850, ed. by Hansjrg Bay,
Kai Merten. Wrzburg: Knigshausen und Neumann 2006, pp. 3352.
Bartra, Roger: Wild Men in the Looking Glass. The Mythic Origins of European
Otherness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1994.
Baum, Bruce: The Rise and Fall of the Caucasian Race. A Political History of
Racial Identity. New York etc.: New York University Press 2006.
Berghahn, Klaus L.: Grenzen der Toleranz. Juden und Christen im Zeitalter der
Aufklrung. Kln etc.: Bhlau 2000.
68
Immanuel Kant: Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbrgerlicher Absicht,
p. 48.
69
Immanuel Kant: Entwrfe zu dem Colleg ber Anthropologie, p. 785; the following
quotation can be found ibid., p. 878.
92 Wulf D. Hund
Goldenberg, David M.: The Curse of Ham. Race and Slavery in Early Judaism,
Christianity, and Islam. Princeton etc.: Princeton University Press 2003.
Goldstein, Eric L.: The Price of Whiteness. Jews, Race, and American Identity.
Princeton etc.: Princeton University Press 2006.
Grellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb: Die Zigeuner. Ein historischer Versuch
ber die Lebensart und Verfassung, Sitten und Schicksahle dieses Volks in
Europa, nebst ihrem Ursprunge. Dessau etc.: Buchhandlung der Gelehrten
1783.
Hanke, Lewis: Aristotle and the American Indians. A Study in Race Prejudice in
the Modern World. London: Hollis and Carter 1959.
Haynes, Stephen R.: Noahs Curse. The Biblical Justification of American Slav-
ery. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press 2002.
Hentges, Gudrun: Schattenseiten der Aufklrung. Die Darstellung von Juden und
Wilden in philosophischen Schriften des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts. Schwal-
bach: Wochenschau Verlag 1999.
Hering Torres, Max Sebastin: Rassismus in der Vormoderne. Die Reinheit des
Blutes im Spanien der Frhen Neuzeit. Frankfurt etc.: Campus 2006.
Hess, Jonathan M.: Jewish Emancipation and the Politics of Race. In: The Ger-
man Invention of Race, ed. by Sara Eigen, Mark Larrimore. New York: State
University of New York Press 2006, pp. 203212.
Hill jr., Thomas E., Bernard Boxill: Kant and Race. In: Race and Racism, ed. by
Bernard Boxill. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press 2001, pp. 448471.
Hintikka, Jaakko, Heiki Kannisto: Kant on The Great Chain of Being or the
Eventual Realization of All Possibilities. A Comparative Study. In: Reforging
the Great Chain of Being, ed. by Simo Knuuttila. Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer
1981, pp. 287308.
Horkheimer, Max, Theodor W. Adorno: Dialektik der Aufklrung. Amsterdam:
Querido 1947.
Hund, Wulf D.: Das Zigeuner-Gen. Rassistische Ethik und der Geist des Kapita-
lismus. In: id., Rassismus. Die soziale Konstruktion natrlicher Ungleichheit.
Mnster: Westflisches Dampfboot 1999, pp. 7593.
: Die weie Norm. Grundlagen des Farbrassismus. In: Cuerpos Anmalos, ed.
by Max S. Hering Torres. Bogot: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2008,
pp. 171203.
: Im Schatten des Glcks. Philosophischer Rassismus bei Aristoteles und Kant.
In: id., Rassismus. Die soziale Konstruktion natrlicher Ungleichheit. Mn-
ster: Westflisches Dampfboot 1999, pp. 110126.
: [Lemma] Rassismus. In: Enzyklopdie Philosophie, ed. by Hans Jrg Sand-
khler. New ed. in 3 vol. Hamburg: Meiner 2010, pp. 21912200.
: Negative Societalisation. Racism and the Constitution of Race. In: Wages of
Whiteness & Racist Symbolic Capital (Racism Analysis Yearbook 1), ed.
by id., Jeremy Krikler, David Roediger. Berlin etc.: Lit 2010, pp. 5796.
: Negative Vergesellschaftung. Dimensionen der Rassismusanalyse. Mnster:
Westflisches Dampfboot 2006.
94 Wulf D. Hund
: Rezension zu Johann Gottfried Herders Ideen. In: WW, vol. 6, pp. 779806.
: Trume eines Geistersehers, erlutert durch Trume der Metaphysik. In: WW,
vol. 1, pp. 919989.
: ber den Gebrauch teleologischer Prinzipien in der Philosophie. In: WW,
vol. 5, pp. 137170.
: ber Pdagogik. In: WW, vol. 6, pp. 691761.
: Von den verschiedenen Rassen der Menschen. In: WW, vol. 6, pp. 730.
: Vorarbeiten zum Streit der Fakultten. In: AA, vol. 23, pp. 421464.
: Vorarbeiten zur Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloen Vernunft. In: AA,
vol. 23, pp. 87124.
Katzew, Ilona: Casta Painting. Images of Race in Eighteenth-Century Mexico.
New Haven etc.: Yale University Press 2004.
Kleingeld, Pauline: Kants Second Thoughts on Race. In: The Philosophical
Quarterly, 57, 2007, 229, pp. 573592.
Lagier, Raphal: Les Races humaines selon Kant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de
France 2004.
Larrimore, Marc: Sublime Waste. Kant on the Destiny of Races. In: Civiliza-
tion and Oppression, ed. by Catherine Wilson (supplement volume 25 of the
Canadian Journal of Philosophy). Calgary: University of Calgary Press 1999,
pp. 99125.
Lenoir, Timothy: Kant, Blumenbach, and Vital Materialism in German Biology.
In: Isis, 71, 1980, 1, pp. 77108.
Liebersohn, Harry: The Travelers World. Europe to the Pacific. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press 2006.
Linnaeus, Carolus (Caroli Linn): Systema Natur. 12th ed., vol. 1. Holmius:
Laurentius Salvius 1766.
Mack, Michael: German Idealism and the Jew. The Inner Anti-Semitism of Phi-
losophy and German Jewish Responses. Chicago etc.: University of Chicago
Press 2003.
Malter, Rudolf: Der Rassebegriff in Kants Anthropologie. In: Die Natur des Men-
schen. Probleme der Physischen Anthropologie und Rassenkunde (1750
1850), ed. by Gunter Mann, Franz Dumont. Stuttgart etc.: Gustav Fischer
1990, pp. 113122.
: Kants Tischgesellschaft nach dem Bericht von Johann Friedrich Abegg. In:
Knigsberg und Riga (Zentren der Aufklrung, vol. 2), ed. by Heinz Ischreyt.
Tbingen: Niemeyer 1995, pp. 143167.
Martnez, Mara Elena: Genealogical Fictions. Limpieza de Sangre, Religion, and
Gender in Colonial Mexico. Stanford: Stanford University Press 2008.
McCarthy, Thomas: On the Way to a World Republic? Kant on Race and Devel-
opment. In: Politik, Moral und Religion Gegenstze und Ergnzungen, ed.
by Lothar R. Waas. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2004, pp. 223242.
McLaughlin, Peter: Soemmering und Kant. ber das Organ der Seele und den
Streit der Fakultten. In: Samuel Thomas Soemmering und die Gelehrten der
96 Wulf D. Hund
Goethezeit, ed. by Gunter Mann, Franz Dumont. Stuttgart etc.: Gustav Fischer
1985, pp. 191201.
Meek, Ronald L.: Social Science and the Ignoble Savage. London etc.: Cam-
bridge University Press 1976.
Mills, Charles W.: Kants Untermenschen. In: Race and Racism in Modern Phi-
losophy, ed. by Andrew Valls. Ithaca etc.: Cornell University Press 2005,
pp. 169193.
Moore, Robert Ian: The Formation of a Persecuting Society. Authority and De-
viance in Western Europe 9501250. 2nd ed. Malden etc.: Blackwell 2007.
Moran III, Francis: Between Primates and Primitives: Natural Man as the Miss-
ing Link in Rousseaus Second Discourse. In: Philosophers on Race. Critical
Essays, ed. by Julie K. Ward, Tommy L. Lott. Oxford etc.: Blackwell 2002,
pp. 125144.
Muthu, Sankar: Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton etc.: Princeton Univer-
sity Press 2003.
Nutz, Thomas: Varietten des Menschengeschlechts. Die Wissenschaften vom
Menschen in der Zeit der Aufklrung. Kln etc.: Bhlau 2009.
Pagliaro, Harold E. (ed.): Racism in the Eighteenth Century. (Studies in
Eighteenth-Century Culture, 3). Cleveland etc.: The Press of Case Western
Reserve University 1973.
Pluchon, Pierre: Ngres et Juifs au XVIIIe sicle. Le racisme au sicle des Lu-
mires. Paris: Tallandier 1984.
Popkin, Richard H.: The Philosophical Basis of Eighteenth-Century Racism. In:
Racism in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Harold E. Pagliaro. Cleveland etc.:
The Press of Case Western Reserve University 1973, pp. 245262.
Pugliese, Joseph: Indigeneity and the Racial Topography of Kants Analytic of
the Sublime. In: Indigeneity: Construction and Re/Presentation, ed. by James
N. Brown, Patricia M. Sants. New York: Nova Science Publishers 1999,
pp. 1531.
Roediger, David: Working Toward Whiteness. How Americas Immigrants Be-
came White. The Strange Journey from Ellis Island to the Suburbs. New York:
Basic Books 2005.
Rttgers, Kurt: Kants Kollege und seine ungeschriebene Schrift ber die Zigeu-
ner. Heidelberg: Manutius 1993.
: Kants Zigeuner. In: Kant-Studien, 88, 1997, 1, pp. 6086.
Rohbeck, Johannes: Die Fortschrittstheorie der Aufklrung. Franzsische und
englische Geschichtsphilosophie in der 2. Hlfte des 18. Jahrhunderts. Frank-
furt etc.: Campus 1987.
Rose, Paul Lawrence: Revolutionary Antisemitism in Germany from Kant to
Wagner. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1990.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques: Discours sur lorigine et les fondemens de lingalit
parmi les hommes. In: id., uvres compltes, ed. by Bernard Gagnebin, Mar-
cel Raymond et al. Vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard 1964, pp. 109223.
It must come from Europe 97