Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
- traffic buffering and management is done for each request whereas CTD are established at the switching
class separately, node. The causes and variations of delays are:
- priorities may be respected. - statistical multiplexing on bearer circuits,
The given approach has disadvantages because ad- - holding in ATM switching,
equate parameters for single traffic modes (e.g. video - network management cell insertion,
traffic) have not been developed and there are prob- - "physica l overhead in the lowest level of ATM".
lems in parallel association of certain transport
When cells from several ATM connections are
modes. multiplexed to the common link, then the cells of one
The developed Markov's and non-Markov's mod-
connection can wait due to cell insertion of the other
els from the queuing theory allow description of con nection. Similarly, some cells can have a delay due
buffer influence on the traffic flows [1 ]. However, a to the insertion of management (OAM) cells. This re-
number of other questions regarding precise descrip- sults in the introduction of a component in cells delay
tion of traffic flow, bund ling, service quality, required which can lead to problematic delay and special delay
capacities, allowed errors, etc. remain unanswered.
hesitation.
Fo ll owing the tendencies of systemic description of
A parameter expressing cell delay variation and
traffic in ATM (BISDN) network, we tend to intro-
tolerance (CDTV) is set at the ATM switching node.
duce generic traffic descriptors related to the basic is-
The application can require guaranteed limits of vari-
sues of service quality management.
ations or specified tolerance.
Connection traffic descriptors (CTD) necessarily
3. ATM TRAFFIC PARAMETERS include CDTV so that in formal expression the follow-
ing holds:
Systemic approach to the study of ATM parame- CDTATM = ( STDATM, CDTV, Rem) (2)
ters requires identification of relevant ATM traffic pa- where:
rameters and the relatio ns between them from a cer- STDATM- source traffic descriptor,
tain viewpoint. ATM traffic parameters are closely CDTV- cell delay variation and tolerance,
connected to the type of service and requirements of
Rem - relations between CTD parameters.
the transfer qua lity. Concrete traffic parameters are
subject of contract between the user and the network. Not all the indicated traffic parameters are always
Traffic contract between the user and the network is relevant for all categories of services. Only PCR is
negotiated by specifying characteristics of the user in- used in all types of ATM services (according to
formation, requirements regarding allowed network ATM-Forum):
delay and transfer quality that should be supported by - CBR (Constant Bit Rate), corresponding to A ser-
the ATM network. If the user does not comply with vice class;
the co ntracted ob ligatio ns, e.g. if too many cells are - VBRrt (Variable Bit Rate, real-time), corresponding
sent over a certain time, then the network operator to B service class;
can undertake action to neutralise the negative effects - VBRnrt (Variable Bit Rate, non-real-time) corre-
to other co nnections in the network. sponding to C and D service class;
R elevant traffic characteristics of user information - UBR (Unspecified Bit Rate);
are specified in the ATM so urce traffic descriptor. - ABR (Available Bit Rate);
While connecting to source traffic descriptor (STD) a - GFR (Guaranteed Frame Rate).
set of ATM traffic parameters is specified which can Other traffic parameters are not used in all types of
be forma lly described by the following notation: services, e.g. ACR is used only for VBRrt and
STDATM = VBRnrt; parameter MCR is used for ABR and GFR
= ( ATY , PCR , ACR , MBS , MCR , RsTP) (1) services [7], [8].
where:
ATY- source type or application which gener-
ates traffic, 4. SYSTEMATISATION AND
PCR- peak cell (generating) rate, FORMALISED DESCRIPTION
ACR- average cell (generating) rate, OF THE QUALITY OF SERVICE
MBS - maximum burst size, (QOS) PARAMETERS
MCR- minimum cell rate,
RTSP- relations between parameters STP ATM. What the user considers important is the initial di-
There is a d istinction between source traffic vision of service quality parameters into:
descriptors (STD) and connection traffic descriptors - QoS parameters- "negotiable",
(CTD) since STD originate from the end station ca ll - QoS parameters- "non-negotiable".
The " negotiable" quality of service parameters can The parameter of max. CfD describes maximal
be formally expressed by: time of cell transfer or delay that may still be accepted
QPNo = ( CLR, CfDmax, CDVptp , Rop) (3) regarding service requirements. Cells that arrive after
where: max. CfD are useless for further application and may
be rejected.
QPNG - Negotiable QoS Parameters,
Cell delay variation (CDV) indicates the deviation
CLR - Cell Loss Ratio
from the actual cell delivery time and the expected cell
CfDmax- Maximum Cell Transfer Delay
delivery time. The CDVptp (peak-to-peak CDV) pa-
CDVptp- peak-to-peak Cell Delay Variation rameter is the difference between the maximum CDV
R 0 p - relation between parameters. and minimum CDV. Delay variations are influenced
"Non-negotiable" quality parameters can be for- by the following factors:
mally represented by the expression: - traffic overload,
GPNN = ( CER, SECBR , CMR, Rop) (4) - A TM switch design,
where: - buffer capacity,
QPNN - Non-negotiable QoS Parameters - number of nodes on the transfer route.
CER - Cell Error Rate The scope of CDV values which is contracted
SECBR- Severely Enwed Cell Block Rate ranges from 19 ms to 655350 ms, in increments of 10
CMR- Cell Misinsertion Rate ms.
CLR is defined as the ration of the number of lost The "non-negotiable" parameters are set by the
cells (failed delivery) to the total number of transmit- network operator taking into consideration the ser-
ted cells on the virtual channel I route (VCNP), i.e. it vice requirements.
holds: Relative frequency of cells that have been trans-
Lost cells ferred with an error (CER- Cell Enor Rate) is deter-
CLR=------------- (5)
Totaltransmitted cells mined by the expression:
Graphical illustration of the CLR problem is given Errored cells
6
in Figure 1. CER Succesfully transfered cells+Errored cells ( )
SECBR parameter is calculated according to the
Cells In Cells Out
expression:
Severely errored cell blocks
'
c::::::::J
(Lost cells)
~
c::::::::J
SECBR .
Totaltransmllted cell blocks
(7)
c=======~~ ~
between certain influencing factors and quality pa-
rameters has been indicated in Table 1. The following
influencing factors have been considered:
Jton
X
~ s
Number of Nodes
CDV
X
CTD
X
CLR
X
CER CMR
X
SECBR
Traffic Load X
Propagation Delay X X X X
Media Errors X X X
Switch Design X X X X
Buffer Capacity X X X X X
Network Failures X X X
ing service quality with efficient, rational and safe traf- The management part of the network needs to
fic flow . This is a generic requirement imposed on all control operatively the flow of traffic entities- ATM
network operators, including ATM network operator. cells, so as to insure good quality of cell transfer a nd
ATM network allows a number of alternative pos- delivery to the destination. In case need arises, the
sibi lities related to service provision, i.e. operative network can require that the source slows down cell
management and control. Adequate management transmission, i.e. it may reject cells of low priority.
(decisions and actions) can satisfy the quality parame- For the traffic control needs ITU-T has specified
ters for single applications. The engaged network re- the generic cell rate algorithm (GCRA) technique,
sources and functions differ in single phases of the which defines relations between the parameters:
call: from request to final cell delivery at the destina- - PCR,
tion. From the user's aspect it is crucial to insure ade- - CDTV,
quate functions and end-to-end quality control, as - MCR,
presented in Figure 3. - MBS.
For every oncoming cell it is checked whether it
end-to-end QoS
has arrived in accordance with the traffic contract re-
segment
6. CONCLUSION SAZETAK