Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
_______________
A Thesis
Presented to the
Faculty of
_______________
In Partial Fulfillment
Master of Sciences
in
Electrical Engineering
_______________
by
Jing Xiao
Summer 2010
iii
Copyright 2010
by
Jing Xiao
DEDICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................v
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................x
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1
1.1 Introduction of Wireless Communication ..........................................................1
1.2 Overview of OFDM and MIMO ........................................................................2
1.3 Motivation of Research and Contributions of Thesis ........................................4
1.4 Outline of Thesis ................................................................................................4
2 OVERVIEW OF THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION CHANNEL .......................6
2.1 Multi-path Spread ..............................................................................................7
2.2 Flat and Frequency Selective Fading .................................................................7
2.3 Rayleigh Fading .................................................................................................8
2.4 Doppler Fading ..................................................................................................8
2.5 Slow and Fast Fading .......................................................................................11
3 INTRODUTION OF OFDM MIMO ...........................................................................13
3.1 Overview of OFDM Techniques .....................................................................13
3.2 Overview of MIMO Techniques ......................................................................16
3.3 Introduction of MIMO OFDM.........................................................................18
4 DIVERSITY COMBINING TECHNIQUES ..............................................................20
4.1 Selection Diversity ...........................................................................................20
4.2 Alamouti Scheme .............................................................................................22
4.2.1 Two-transmitter-One-Receiver Alamouti Scheme .................................22
4.2.2 Two-Transmitter-Two-Receiver Alamouti Scheme ...............................24
4.3 Beamforming Technique .................................................................................25
4.4 Maximal-Ratio Receiver Combining (MRRC) ................................................28
5 CHANNEL ESTIMATION .........................................................................................31
5.1 Single Channel Estimation ...............................................................................31
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My deepest gratitude to Professor Santosh Nagaraj for always being there offering
suggestions and guidance. The thesis would not have been completed without his help. My
special thanks to Professor Sridhar Seshagiri and Professor Samuel K. Kee S. Moon for their
great patience to go through my thesis. Finally, I want to give my heartfelt thanks to my
husband for his support and encouragement, also I want to give my thanks to my parents and
my beloved baby Leo.
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
coverage calls for innovative techniques that improve spectral efficiency and link reliability,
more technologies in wireless communication are introduced, like OFDM and MIMO.
802.11a standard uses the same core protocol as the original standard, operates at 5 GHz
band, and uses a 52-subcarrier orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) with a
maximum raw data rate of 54 Mbit/s, which yields realistic net achievable throughput in the
mid-20 Mbit/s. Since the 2.4 GHz band is heavily used to the point of being crowded, using
the 5 GHz band gives 802.11a a significant advantage [6].OFDM is also applied in 802.16
and WiMAX technologies. IEEE 802.16 standard is the IEEE Standard for Wireless
Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs), also known as WiMAX and WirelessLAN [7].
Wimax is an acronym that stands for Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access. It is
a telecommunications technology that provides wireless data in a variety of ways, from
point-to-point links to full mobile cellular type access [8].
MIMO has been developed for many years for wireless systems. One of the
earliest MIMO to wireless communications applications came in mid 1980 with the
breakthrough developments by Jack Winters and Jack Saltz of Bell Laboratories [9]. They
tried to send data from multiple users on the same frequency/time channel using multiple
antennas both at the transmitter and receiver. Since then, several academics and
engineers have made significant contributions in the field of MIMO. Now MIMO
technology has aroused interest because of its possible applications in digital television,
wireless local area networks, metropolitan area networks and mobile communication.
Comparing to the Single-input-single-output (SISO) system MIMO provides enhanced
system performance under the same transmission conditions. First, MIMO system
greatly increases the channel capacity, which is in proportional to the total number of
transmitter and receiver arrays. Second, MIMO system provides the advantage of spatial
variety: each one transmitting signal is detected by the whole detector array, which not
only improved system robustness and reliability, but also reduces the impact of ISI (inter
symbol interference) and the channel fading since each signal determination is based on N
detected results. In other words, spatial diversity offers N independent replicas of
transmitted signal. Third, the Array gain is also increased, which means SNR gain
achieved by focusing energy in desired direction is increased [10].On the other hand,
MIMO also cost more energy including both the transmission energy and the circuit
energy consumption. Energy-efficiency analysis of MIMO system is important topic in
MIMO research.
4
these impairment mechanisms and error probability of the different schemes are analyzed
under the condition that CSI (channel state information) are fully or partially known over
these fading channels.
In chapter 4, if channel state information is unknown, there are two methods used in
this thesis to get channel information. One is single channel estimation, another is joint
channel estimation,, these two estimation methods could be applied to the schemes shown in
chapter 2, then the error probability of analysis will be found and the results will be
compared to previous ones.
In chapter 5, new schemes will be introduced in this chapter. 1FFT schemes will be
applied, and there are different ways to improve these schemes, like adding weight,
convolutional coding and Viterbi decoding, then the comparison between the new scheme
with MRRC and selection diversity are discussed.
Finally, Chapter 6 summarizes the main conclusions and provides suggestions for
further work in this area.
6
CHAPTER 2
Tx Rx
multi-path fading
Frequency selective fading will induce inter-symbol interference, which can be undone by
digital processing. In other words, assuming a single transmitted impulse, whose time
duration Tm is the duration between the first and last received component that possesses the
maximum delay spread, therefore the coherence bandwidth f c is 1/ Tm. As we all know,
symbol time is Ts. A channel is said to frequency selective fading if Tm>Ts and it is said to
flat fading if Tm<Ts. [12].
Let us consider BPSK signals in a slow, Rayleigh fading channel with additive white
Gaussian noise. We define the number of channel taps as L, meaning that there are L taps to
represent the fading channel. After simulation with Matlab using simply one transmitter
antenna and one receiver antenna, the results of which are shown in Figure 2.2, we see that
when the tap is 1 in the fading channel, the bit error rate is the best; when the tap is 5, the bit
error rate is the worst, which is simply because more taps mean more fading within the
channel, and thus the worse the performance becomes.
For waves which do not require a medium, such as light or gravity in special
relativity, only the relative difference in velocity between the observer and the source needs
to be considered [14]. For wireless communication, when electromagnetic wave is traveling
towards or away from the receiver, the carrier frequency will be shifted, causing Doppler
shift. It is noticed that Doppler shift is usually prominent when the transmit antenna is far
from receive antenna.
As we can see from Figure 2.3, the phase difference between two transmission paths
is:
Because the detected frequency increases as objects moving toward the observer, the
source's velocity must be subtracted when motion is moving toward the observer. (This is
because the source's velocity is in the denominator.) Conversely, detected frequency
decreases when the source moves away, and so the source's velocity is added when the
motion is away.
Figure 2.4. SISO simulation under Rayleigh and Doppler fading channel,
fd is Doppler shift factor.
T c 1/ f d
If the symbol time duration T s is smaller than T c, the fading is slow fading; otherwise, the
channel fading is fast fading [17].
13
CHAPTER 3
After transmitted through the channel (in wireless communications, channel means
the route through which the message is sent), when the frequency signals reach the
receiver, the receiver has to perform Synchronization (both timing and frequency),
Channel Estimation, Demodulation and Decoding. The data processing at receiver end
14
reverses that at the transmitter side, that is, at the receiver, an FFT block is firstly used to
transfer the received time-domain signal into frequency-domain. Ideally, the output of the
FFT block should be identical to the transmitted symbols before the IFFT block.
Assuming channel information is known, the symbols will be demodulated and
estimated based on these channel information.
The basic structure of OFDM receiver is shown in Figure 3.2.
When there are more than one transmission path between the transmitter and the
receiver, or received signal is the sum of many versions of the transmitted signal with
varying delay and attenuation, the multi-path effect occur, among which ISI effect is the
most important. To reduce this effect, two methods are generally used in the OFDM
scheme: parallel data transmission and cyclic prefix. Usually the length of the cyclic
prefix is no shorter than the length of the channels impulse response. The basic idea is
to replicate part of the OFDM time-domain waveform from the back to the front to create
a guard period. The duration of the guard period Tg should be longer than the worst-case
delay spread of the target multi-path environment. In Figure 3.3, the structure of cyclic
prefix is illustrated [19].
We will better understand this concept through the following example, which
shows OFDM signals in frequency domain (BPSK signals such as 1,-1). After cyclic
prefix is applied, the number of subcarriers increase from 64 to 80, in which the last 16
subcarriers as we can see from Figure 3.4 is exactly the same with the first 16 subcarriers.
For illustration purpose, let us consider BPSK signals in slow, frequency non-
selective fading channels with additive white Gaussian noise. 64 subcarriers in frequency
domain are set, illustrated in the top curve in Figure 3.4. The signals are then transferred
to time domain and the cyclic prefix is added, the results of which are shown in the bottom
curve in Figure 3.4.
In Figure 3.5, we show the OFDM signals with cyclic prefix in frequency domain
after channel distortion. , As we can see the last 16 subcarriers from Figure 3.5 is exactly the
same with the first 16 subcarriers.
16
After we get the demodulated signals, we need equalize them. Figure 3.6 shows the
equalized OFDM subcarriers in time domain without cyclic prefix.
r1=h11x1+h12x2++h1NxN
2=h21x1+h22x2++h2NxN
rM=hM1x1+hM2x2++hMNxN
17
where hij is a weight coefficient that represents the impact of the jth transmitting signal xj on
the jth receiver signal strength. We define a channel matrix H as:
MIMO system can provide two types of gains: diversity gain and spatial
multiplexing gain. And in past work, it is known that there is a fundamental tradeoff
between these two gains: higher spatial multiplexing gain comes at the price of sacrificing
diversity [20].
Diversity is used in MIMO to combat channel fading. Since in MIMO each pair of
transmitting and receiving antennas provides a signal path from the transmitter to the
receiver and each path carry the same information simultaneously, the signal achieved in the
receive antenna is more reliable and the fading can be effectively decreased. If the path
gains between individual transmitreceive antenna pairs fade independently, in this case
multiple parallel spatial channels are created. By transmitting independent information
streams in parallel through the spatial channels, the data rate can be increased. This effect is
also called spatial multiplexing [21].
So the benefit of diversity is lower error probability and the benefit of multiplexing is
higher rate though the difference between them is that the requirement of diversity is
sending the same information and the requirement of multiplexing is send independent
information. Obviously, the conflicts between the two suggest fundamental tradeoff
between benefits obtained from diversity and multiplexing.
advantage of the multipath properties of environments using base station antennas that do
not have LOS. By combining both techniques, MIMO-OFDM can offer both robustness and
high throughput. In a multiuser scenario where many users communicate with a central
station (base station or access point), MIMO-OFDM becomes even more appealing because
it provides an additional opportunity to exploit due to many users.
In Figure 3.8, the basic structure of MIMO OFDM is demonstrated. In this figure, the
signals are modulated by OFDM modulator, then they are transmitted by MIMO system,
finally, the signals are recovered by the OFDM demodulator.
Therefore, MIMO OFDM achieves spectral efficiency, increased throughput and the
inter-symbol interference (ISI) can thus be prevented.
20
CHAPTER 4
selects the one with the highest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this case, the strongest signal
is picked up and other signals that have undergone deep fades are unlikely to be picked by
the receiver, which can avoid the deep fading effect. Therefore, the more the channels are,
the more accurate the recovered would be. There is also no need for any addition of the
fading channel outputs, which further decreases the complexity. Since Selection diversity
does not require any knowledge of the phases, it is usually used in non coherent or
differential coherent modulation schemes. The structure of selection diversity is shown in
Figure 4.1: the signals from the transmitter antenna are sent through multiple channels,
selected by the detector system and finally received by the receive antenna.
Figure 4.2. Result of selection diversity when the number of the transmit
antennas are 1, 2 and 4.
the same time from the two transmitting antennas In this case, x1, x2 are baseband complex
symbols carrying the information. The time and transmit sequence are shown as the
following:
Time Antenna1 Antenna2
T X1 x2
T+T -x2* x1*
. Symbols x1 and x2 are sent with the first beam at time t, while -x2*and x1* (* stands
for complex conjugate) are transmitted through the second beam at time t+T, where T is the
symbol duration [24].
The channel model is
At the receiver of the Alamouti scheme, the signals are respectively received at
times t and t+T, where
r1= h1x1+h2x2+n1
r2= -h1x2*+h2x1*+n2
Here r1, r2 are the received signals and n1, n2 are the complex random variables representing
the noise and interference. The received symbols are then combined and processed by the
decoder. The receivers obtain the signals s1, s2 through the following matrix after computing
the estimates of the complex channel gains, that is,
s1=h1*r1+h2r2*
s2=h2*r1-h1r2*
The transmitting signals at the transmitting antennas are shown as the following::
The receiving signals at the receiving antennas are shown in the following format::
t+T R3 r4
There exist four communication channels between the two transmitter antennas and
two receiver antennas, which are defined as h1, h2, h3, h4, respectively. The relationship
between the receiving and transmitting signals can be represented as:
r1=h1x1+h2x2+n1
r2=-h1x2*+h2x1*+n2
r3=h3x1+h4x2+n3
r4=-h3x2*+h4x1*+n3
Where x1, x2 represent the transmitted signals, r1 , r2 , r3, r4 are the received signals and n1
n2 n3 n4 are complex random variables representing the noise and interference. The
receivers then obtain the signals s1, s2 after computing the estimates of the complex channel
gains, that is,
s1=h1*r1+h2r2*+ h3*r3+h4r4
s2=h2*r1-h1r2*+ h4*r3-h3r4*
In this case, the results of this scheme are equivalent to those obtained by the 4-branch
(MRRC) scheme, which is going to be discussed in Section 3.4. Figure 4.4 denotes
performance of BPSK signals using Two Transmitters with Two Receivers Alamouti
scheme in slow, Rayleigh fading channel with additive white Gaussian noise. As we can
see, the result is equivalent to the one obtained with the 1 transmitter 4 receiver MRRC
scheme [25].
h1= a1ej1
h2= a2ej2
Therefore the signal transmitted by the first transmitting antenna is xh1* and the signal
transmitted by the second transmitting antenna is, xh2.*
After going through the channels, signals that are received by the receivers could be
represented as:
r1= xh1*h1+n1= a12x+n1
Where r1, r2 are the received signals and n1, n2 are complex random variables representing
the noise and interference.
The combining scheme for two-branch Beamforming is:
Then after equalizing the a12+ a22 coefficient, we can get the final signal after decision
making.
The benefits of MIMO Beamforming is that the power gain and array gain get
increased and that the co-channel inter-cell interference are reduced; also the diversity gain
get increased, because Beamforming can combat the fading effects of the channel. With
Per- subcarrier Beamforming reducing spectral nulls, the multipath effect mitigates.
In Figure 4.6 the performance of BPSK signals using One Transmit antenna and One
Receive antenna Beamforming scheme, Two Transmit antenna and One Receive antenna
Beamforming scheme, Four Transmit antenna and One Receive antenna Beamforming
scheme, in slow, Rayleigh fading channel with additive white Gaussian noise are illustrated.
As we can see, the performance of Beamforming scheme is not as good as MRRC scheme.
28
slightly more complex than Selection Diversity, the performance is especially good in the
case of independent fading channels.
MRRC selects all the branches and gets the average square value of each branch to
decrease Rayleigh fading. The basic structure of Maximal-ratio Receiver Combining
scheme is illustrated in Figure 4.7.
Let us first consider a one-transmitter-two-receiver MRRC model. At a given time, a
signal x is sent from the transmitter. The channel between the transmit antenna and the
29
receive antenna one is denoted by h1 and between the transmit antenna and the receive
antenna two is denoted by h2 where
h1= a1ej1
h2= a2ej2
Considering the noise and interference added at the two receivers, the resulting
received signals could be written as:
r1=h1x+n1
r2=h2x+n2
Where r1, r2 are the received signals and n1, n2 are complex random variables representing
the noise and interference.
The receiver combining scheme for a two-branch MRRC is as following:
S=h1*r1+ h2*r2
= h1*(h1x+n1) + h2*(h2x+n2)
= (a12+ a22) x+ h1*n1 +h2*n2
Then after equalizing the a122+ a22 coefficient, we can get the final signal after decision
making.
Figure 4.8 illustrates the performance of BPSK signals using One Transmit antenna
with One Receive antenna MRRC scheme, One Transmit antenna with Two Receive
antenna MRRC scheme, One Transmit antenna with Four Receive antenna MRRC scheme,
30
Figure 4.8. Performance of Max Ratio Combining when the number of the
receiving antenna are 1,2 and 4.
CHAPTER 5
CHANNEL ESTIMATION
The discussions and investigations in Chapter 4 are based on the fact that the channel
state information is known either by transmitter or receiver, which is not always true in
reality. In this chapter, we will discuss the channel estimation technique when the channel
information is not available. We then study the performance of the communication schemes
discussed in Chapter 3 with channel estimation technique. Channel information detector will
be introduced. Some popular detection algorithms and the modulation result in OFDM
MIMO will also be discussed in this chapter.
A known sequence of bits is generally used in channel estimation. The bit-sequence is
unique for a certain transmitter and is repeated in every transmission burst. Thus, the channel
estimator is able to estimate channel impulse response for each burst separately by exploiting
the known transmitted bits and the corresponding received samples.
Dynamic estimation of channel is necessary before the demodulation of OFDM
signals since the radio channel is frequency selective and time-varying for wideband mobile
communication systems. In this chapter, binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) modulation in a
Rayleigh fading and Doppler fading channel will be applied in Matlab simulations to
illustrate and compare the performance difference of each communication scheme, using the
above- mentioned channel estimation techniques.
denoted as h1 and between the transmit antenna and the receive antenna 2 is denoted as h2
where
h1= a1ej1
h2= a2ej2
After convolving with the channel, noise and interference are added to the preamble
symbols. The resulting received preamble signals are
p-received1= h1p+n1
p-received2= h2p+n2
Where p-received1, p-received2 are the received preamble signals and n1, n2 are
complex random variables representing the noise and interference.
Since the receiver has already known the preamble sequence p, the channel can be
estimated as following:
estimated-h1= p-received1/ p estimated-h2= p-received1/ p
Then at a given time, a signal x is sent from the transmitter after is channel estimation is
completed. After convolving with the channel, noise and interference are added to the
symbols. The resulting received baseband signals are
r1=h1x+n3
r2=h2x+n4
Where r1, r2 are the received signals and n3, n4 are complex random variables representing the
noise and interference.
33
Figure 5.3. Performance of single transmitter and single receiver when the rate
between energy and noise of the preamble is 0dB, 5dB and 10dB.
36
antennas, namely, p(1), p(2), p(3), p(4), p(5)p(64) , which can be splitted into two parts: odd
part and even part:
Then 0 will be inserted in the rest even and odd part of these two sequences, so
the preamble sequences become
p(1), 0, p(3), 0, p(5)p(63), 0 and 0, p(2), 0, p(4), 0, p(6)0, p(64).
Then these two preamble sequences will be individually transmitted through the channel
and be estimated at the same time to increase the efficiency. The procedure is shown at
Figure 5.4.
Let us consider applying the joint channel estimation technique in the Beamforming
scheme.. Here preamble sequence p is separated into two parts: p1 and p2, where p1 is sent
from the first transmitter to the receiver, p2 is sent from the second transmitter to the receiver.
The channel between the transmit antenna one and the receive antenna is denoted as
h1 and between the transmit antenna two and the receive antenna is denoted as h2 where
h1= a1ej1
h2= a2ej2
After convolving with the channel, noise and interference are added to the preamble
symbols. The resulting received preamble signals are
p-received1= h1p1+n1
p-received2= h2p2+n2
37
Where p-received1, p-received2 are the received preamble signals and n1, n2 are
complex random variables representing the noise and interference.
Since the receiver has already known the preamble sequence p, the channel can be
estimated as following:
estimated-h1=odd- p-received1/odd- p1
estimated-h2= even-p-received2/even- p2
Where odd- p-received1 is the odd part of p-received1, even-p-received1 is the even
part of p-received2, odd- p1 is the odd part of p1, even- p2 is the even part of p. After being
resampled, estimated-h1 and estimated-h2 will turn from 32 to 64, which can be denoted as
resample- h1 ,resample- h2.
Then at a given time, a signal x is sent from the transmitter after is channel estimation
is completed. After convolving with the channel, noise and interference are added to the
symbols. The resulting received baseband signals are
r1=h3x+n3
r2=h4x+n4
Where r1, r2 are the received signals, h3, h4 are channel information and n3, n4 are
complex random variables representing the noise and interference.
Consider the estimated channel state information resample-h1 and ressample-h2,
The final signal after decision making is
In the Figure 5.5, we compared the performance between one transmit antenna one
receive antenna using single channel estimation and two transmit antennas one receive
antenna using joint channel estimation through slow, Rayleigh fading channel with additive
38
Figure 5.5. Joint channel estimation in two transmit antennas one receive
antenna compare to single channel estimation 1 transmit antenna and 1
receive antenna.
this time, the performance of singlet channel estimation one transmit antenna one receive
antenna system is better.
40
CHAPTER 6
Figure 6.1. Two transmitters and one receiver scheme with one FFT.
41
h2= a2ej2
After convolving with the channel, noise and interference are added to the
transmitting symbols. The resulting received preamble signals are
r1= h1x+n1
r2= h2 x+n2
Where r1, r2 are the received signals and n1, n2 are complex random variables
representing the noise and interference.
Assuming that 64 subcarriers are used in each channel, which are denoted as
42
Figure 6.2. Performance about single FFT combining sum abs 1Transmit antenna
1,2,3,4 Receive antenna.
44
Figure 6.3. Performance about single FFT combining sum square 1Transmit antenna
1,2,4 Receive antenna.
45
Figure 6.4. Performance comparison of single FFT combing sum abs, sum square
and sum square with weight.
46
h2= a2ej2
47
Figure 6.5. Performance comparison between sum square single FFT combing
with weight and MRRC.
48
After convolving with the channel, noise and interference are added to the preamble
symbols. The resulting received preamble signals are
p-received1= h1p+n1
p-received2= h2p+n2
Where p-received1, p-received2 are the two received preamble signals and n1, n2 are complex
random variables representing the noise and interference.
The channel can be estimated as following based on the received preamble signals
and the know preambles:estimated-h1= p-received1/ p estimated-h2= p-received1/ p.
On the other hand, the received signals when transmitting a general signal x are
r1=h1x+n3
49
r2=h2x+n4
Where n3, n4 denote noise and interference.
The signal estimation of the originally transmitted signal could then be defined during
the following process:
S= (W1* r1+ W2* r2)/ (W1* h1+ W2* h2)
=( sum1/( sum1+sum2)* r1+ sum2/( sum1+sum2)* r2)/ (sum1/( sum1+sum2)* h1+ sum2/(
sum1+sum2)* h2)
= (sum1* r1+ sum2* r2)/ (sum1* h1+ sum2* h2)
=( sum1*( estimated-h1x+n1) + sum2*( estimated-h2x+n2))/ (sum1* h1+ sum2* h2)
=( sum1* estimated-h1x+ sum1*n1 + sum2* estimated-h2x+ sum2*n2) / (sum1* h1+ sum2* h2)
=(sum1* estimated-h1+ sum2* estimated-h2) *x /(sum1* h1+ sum2* h2)+ (sum1*n1 +
sum2*n2)/ (sum1* h1+ sum2* h2)
Where W1 and W2 are the channel weight as defined in the previous section, note that
the sum1 and sum2 in the formula can be both magnitude-sum or square-sum We apply the
above signal estimation scheme in the 1 transmitter 1 receiver, 2 receivers and 4 receivers
with square- sum weight principle, the results of which are shown in Figure 6.7.
Viterbi decoding has the advantage that it has a fixed decoding time, which is well suited to
hardware decoder implementation. Viterbi decoding eliminates least likely trellis path at each
transmission stage and reduces decoding complexity with early rejection of unlike path [27].
So it is more efficient than Maximal Likelihood via concentrating on survival paths of the
trellis.
51
Figure 6.9. Performance comparison between single FFT combining sum abs with
coding and without coding.
52
Also we can find better performance when weight is added. Figure 6.11 compares the
performance of 1-FFT combining scheme using weighted square-sum technique in the 1
transmitter and 1 receiver, 2 receivers, 4 receivers configurations respectively, with and
without coding. In this set of simulation, we assume known channel condition.
We conduct the same simulation in the unknown channel condition. In this case,
channel estimation is conducted based on sending known preambles. Simulation results are
shown in Figure 6.12. We note that when convolutional encoder and Viterbi decoder are
introduced, the performance increases by more than 5dB.
Finally, as a reference, we also compare MRRC to the single FFT combining scheme
using coding + square-sum weight + preamble. The performance is shown in Figure 6.13. It
is also illustrated in Figure 6.14 about the performance comparison of selection diversity with
the single FFT combining scheme using coding + square-sum weight + preamble. As we can
see, the performance degrades when using single FFT structure, which is, again, the trade-off
53
Figure 6.11. Performance comparison between single FFT combining sum square
plus weight with coding and without coding.
Figure 6.12. Performance comparison between single FFT combining sum square
with weight, preamble plus coding and sum square with weight and preamble.
55
Figure 6.13. Performance comparison between single FFT combining sum square
with weight, preamble plus coding and MRRC with preamble and coding.
56
Figure 6.14. Performance comparisons between sum square with weight, preamble
plus coding and selection diversity with preamble and preamble.
57
CHAPTER 7
space -time trellis according to the characteristic of the channel to improve the signal
estimation process.
Research on the possibility of further reducing MIMO system complexity and
developing corresponding coding and decoding schemes, without significantly impact
the system performance.
Design some pre-coding/framing mechanism which can be employed to translate a
MISO or SIMO system into a mathematically equivalent SISO channel, furthermore
to translate a MIMO channel into a mathematically equivalent SiMO or MOSI
channel.
Explore more channel estimation methods to get better and more accurate channel
state information, these methods may include coherent detection, equalization or
pilot-symbol-aided estimation.
59
REFERENCES