Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CA
Flores filed a Motion to Dismiss on the ground of lack of jurisdiction claiming that since
the complaint stemmed from the employer-employee relations between the parties, the
labor arbiter had jurisdiction. The RTC denied the Motion to Dismiss for lack of merit.
1. Whether or not the Labor Arbiter has jurisdiction over the instant case.
In order to be cognizable by the labor arbiter, the claim for damages arising from
employer-employee relations under paragraph 4, Article 217 of the Labor Code must
have a reasonable causal connection with any of the claims provided for in that article. [2]
Only if there is such a connection with the other claims can the claim for damages be
considered as arising from employer-employee relations.[3]
In the instant case, the damages claimed by Eco-Triangle do not have a reasonable
causal connection with any of the claims enumerated under Article 217 of the Labor
Code. The allegations in the complaint unequivocally reveal that the action was based
on Articles 19 and 21 of the Civil Code and does not involve the adjudication of a labor
dispute. Plainly, the employer-employee
relationship between Eco-Triangle and Flores is merely incidental and does not negate
the jurisdiction of the trial court.