# MODERATOR

Good morning ladies and gentlements. Today we will have a debate between team A as
the affirmative team and team B as the opposite team. I am Siska Anggita will be the
moderator for this session and Ms. Ayumi Paramitha will be the time keeper to checking
and report the duration of each speech.
Okay, let me introduce both of the team

The first Team is the affirmative team from Nursing department of polytechnic of health
Denpasar with :
Mrs. Luh Putu Sugiartini as the first speaker.
Ms. Sri Utami Devi as the second speaker, and
Ms. Yuliantari Dewi as the third speaker.
The reply speech will be delivered by Ms. Dewi Danasuari

The Negative Team is from Nursing department of polytechnic of health Denpasar with :
Ms. Sintha Yulianasari as the first speaker.
Ms. Hera Wahyu as the second speaker, and
Ms. Githa Mayaswari as the third speaker.
The reply speech will be delivered by Ms. Wahyu Wandhini
The Role for this debate session :
During the debate, please silence your mobile phone or any device that may produce
disturbing sounds.
During the course of each speech, the audience is not allowed to come or get out or to
talk.
For Substantive Speeches, the time keeper will knock once at the minute of four to
remind the speaker that the time is one minute left, and will knock twice at the minute
of five to show that time is up, and twenty seconds after that, the time keeper will knock
continuously, and the speaker must stop the speech.
For Reply Speeches, the time keeper will knock once at the minute of two to remind
the speaker that the time is one minute left, and will knock twice at the minute of three
to show that time is up, and twenty seconds after that, the time keeper will knock
continuously, and the speaker must stop the speech.
The time keeper will announce each speakers duration of speech after the speaker has
finished the speech.

Okay ladies and gentlement , Id like to show you about todays motion. Today we have
This House Would Banned Death Penalty. as todays motion. So, ladies and gentlemen
lets start our debate. So each team has finished up their building and now they are
ready to debate. So Ill call the first speaker from the affirmative team to deliver the
opinions.

For the first speaker of the affirmative team, time is yours !

# MODERATOR

Well thanks for the first speaker of the affirmative team. Next Ill call the first
speaker of the opposite team to deliver the opinion. Time is yours !

# MODERATOR

Well thats the first arguments from the opposite team. What do you think about
the motion ? To the second of affirmative team , time is yours !

# MODERATOR

Well thanks for the second speaker of the affirmative team , next Ill call the
second speaker from opposite team to give the rebuttal for the second arguments of
affirmative team. Time is yours !

# MODERATOR

Thanks for the second speaker of the opposite team , thats a good opinion.
Okay ladies and gentlemen, next Ill call the third speaker of affirmative team to deliver
the conclution. Time is yours !

# MODERATOR

Well thats the conclution of the affirmative team. Next Ill call the third speaker
of the opposite team to deliver the conclution. Time is yours !

# MODERATOR

Well thats the conclution of opposite team. Now Ill call the reply of affirmative
team to deliver the conclution. Time is yours!

# MODERATOR

Well thats the conclution of opposite team. Now Ill call the reply of opposite
team to deliver the conclution. Time is yours!

# MODERATOR

Desak Vania as the time keeper. Okay Desak time is yours

 # MODERATOR

Well thanks for our time keeper. So, ladies and gentlements , I think thats all
our debate today. Thanks for your attention and see you.
 # THE 1st OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Good morning madam chair, ladies and gentleman now I would like to introduce
our team, I as first speaker from affirmative team and Sri Utami As our second
speaker Yuliantari as third speaker and Dewi As last speaker.

I completely agree with the motion that this house believes terrorism can get death
penalty. Before I deliver my arguments I will be deliver the definition about death
penalthy. Death penalty, also called capital punishment, is when a government or
state executes (kills) someone, usually but not always because they have
committed a serious crime. A crime that can be punished with the death penalty is
called a capital crime or a capital offense. Executions in most countries have
become rarer in recent centuries. The death penalty is a disputed and controversial
topic.

Ladies and gentleman beside there, that I will deliver some arguments
about the motion. My argument are :

- terrorist attack or other war crime is a political inconvenience, affects the work
day of many citizens, and shifts the populations focus from productivity to
protection.

- Terrorism is coordinated attacks aimed evoke a feeling of terror against a group

of people

- Terrorism, treason, and other war related crimes, involve mass casualties and
affect the international community.

I think that,s all my arguments. And I completely agree with the motion.
And that time I give back to the moderator.

# THE 1st OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Thank for the time that given to me. Good afternoon Madam chair and
ladies and gentlements. Im (sebut nama), dan memperkenalkan anggota
klompok. I personally think I do not agree with the motion that this house
believes terrorism can get death penalty.

- because it could be violate human rights

- they believe humans should not abolish human life

So, ladies and gentlemen based on my opinion that I have been delivered. I
still stand up on my opinion that I disagree with the motion. And that time I give
back to the moderator.

# THE 2nd SPEAKER OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Good afternoon madam chair, ladies and gentlemen. I want to give my rebuttal for
the first argument of negative team. The first negative speaker said terrorism can
get death penalty because it could be violate human rights, in fact they are abolish
human life too, so they are violate human rights. If they are willing to kill
hundreds or thousands of people, to the point they'd give up their own life to do
so, surely we can't be blamed for wanting to rid ourselves of such dangers?

Ladies and gentleman beside there, that I will deliver some arguments about the
motion. My argument are :

If the penalty is not severe, the act is bound to be repeated more

frequently. The penalties for any crime are only a deterrent, there is no
way to stop it 100%; but effective curtailment is crucial, so the
consequence of breaking any law (secular/moral/religious) must be
relative to the desired impact(in this case these highest)

# THE 2nd OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Good afternoon madam chair, ladies and gentlemen. I want to give my rebuttal for
the second argument of affirmative team . No one deserves the death penalty, even
terrible people who wish to only do us harm. We all have our believes and way of
living and even though theirs is not right and causes problems and hurts others, it
is not right to stoop to their level than turn around and say we are better than them
when we just did the same thing.
Ladies and gentleman beside there, that I will deliver some arguments about the
motion. My argument are :

I personally think I do not agree with the motion that this house believes terrorism
can get death penalty because it prohibited religion

# THE 3rd SPEAKER OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Good afternoon madam chair, ladies and gentlemen. I want to give my rebuttal for
the second argument of negative team. She said the religion is one of reason to
prohibited terrorism to get death penalty. But I dont think so cause you know
terrorism kill much person from child until adult who innocent one. Why
terrorism didnt killer without see the religion?

Ladies and gentleman beside there, that I will deliver some arguments about the
motion. My argument are :

The penalty for the terrorism must do it. Without see about religion.
Because if like this much terrorism will be reign in everywhere. And this
is one reason and one penalty make terrorism be curred.

# THE 3rd SPEAKER OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Good afternoon madam chair, ladies and gentlemen. I want to give my rebuttal for
the third argument of affirmative team. She said the penalty must do it, but you
know in some country like Prancis cannot do it cause about the human right. And
every human have human right.

Ladies and gentleman beside there, that I will deliver some arguments about the
motion. My argument are :

I personally think I do not agree with the motion that this house believes
terrorism can get death penalty because it prohibited human right and
religion
 # THE REPLY OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Good afternoon madam chair, ladies and gentlemen. Here I want to deliver the
conclusion of our opinion. In conclusion :

terrorist attack or other war crime is a political inconvenience, affects the

work day of many citizens, and shifts the populations focus from
productivity to protection.
If the penalty is not severe, the act is bound to be repeated more
frequently. The penalties for any crime are only a deterrent, there is no
way to stop it 100%; but effective curtailment is crucial, so the
consequence of breaking any law (secular/moral/religious) must be
relative to the desired impact(in this case these highest)

Thats the conclusion of our team, so ladies and gentlemen based on the definition,
limitation, and opinion of our team. We are still stand up on our opinion that This house
believes terrorism can get death penalthy. I am (sebut nama) the time I give back to
the moderator.

# THE REPLY SPEAKER OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Good afternoon madam chair, ladies and gentlemen. Here I want to deliver the
conclusion of our opimion. In conclusion :

terrorism can get death penalty because it could be violate human rights

terrorism can get death penalty because it psrohibited religion

Thats the conclusion of our team, so ladies and gentlemen based on the definition,
limitation, and opinion of our team. We are still stand up on our opinion that we are
disagree with the motion This house believes terrorism can get death penalthy. I am
(sebut nama) the time I give back to the moderator
 # THE TIME KEEPER

(TK: The first speaker of the Affirmative team

spent............................minutes................................seconds)

(TK: The first speaker of the Negative team

spent............................minutes................................seconds)

(TK: The second speaker of the Affirmative team

spent............................minutes................................seconds)

(TK: The second speaker of the Negative team

spent............................minutes................................seconds)

(TK: The third speaker of the Affirmative team

spent............................minutes................................seconds)

(TK: The third speaker of the Negative team

spent............................minutes................................seconds)

(TK: The Reply speaker of the Affirmative team

spent............................minutes................................seconds)

(TK: The Reply speaker of the Negative team

spent............................minutes................................seconds)