Sie sind auf Seite 1von 11

Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS.

For personal use only; all rights reserved

Bowel Wall Thickening on Transabdominal Sonography
Hans Peter Ledermann 1, Norbert Brner 2, Holger Strunk 3, Georg Bongartz 1, Christoph Zollikofer 4, Gerd Stuckmann 4

T he potential value of transabdom-

inal sonography in the diagnosis
of bowel diseases is often not suf-
bowel segment in context with the clinical in-
formation often leads to a limited differential
diagnosis or to the correct diagnosis.
gastrointestinal tract. If intestinal wall thick-
ening is found, detailed evaluation of the dis-
eased segment is performed with a linear or
ficiently appreciated and is even underesti- The differential diagnoses of small- curved high-frequency (7.513 MHz) trans-
mated. Bowel gas artifacts and the somewhat bowel wall thickening and of colonic wall ducer. When the affected bowel segment is
confusing sonographic appearance of the gas- thickening are shown in Appendixes 1 and far from the abdominal surface and when the
trointestinal tract may render orientation and 2, respectively. patient is obese, a fair amount of pressure
interpretation of sonographic structures diffi- This article provides a systematic overview must be applied to the transducer to get ac-
cult. Bowel wall thickening, the main sono- of diseases that may cause bowel wall thick- ceptable images. For optimal results, it may
graphic correlate of bowel disorders, seems at ening. Typical sonographic features of these be necessary to change the patients position
first glance a very nonspecific sign, which disorders are discussed and compared. A re- several times during the examination. Only
may explain why inexperienced investigators view of the literature further summarizes the careful methodic examination of the entire
do not feel confident in the sonographic eval- reported diagnostic potential of sonography abdomen leads to acceptable results; the ac-
uation of the gastrointestinal tract. However, and its limitations. curacy of the examination depends largely
it has been shown that transabdominal sonog- on the radiologists experience and patience
raphy achieves good to excellent results as a [5]. Ideally, patients fast overnight before the
directed tool for evaluating potential bowel Technique examination, but at least 45 hr of fasting are
disorders: appendicitis can be diagnosed with Examination of the intestinal tract usually needed to avoid excessive gas in the intesti-
a sensitivity ranging from 80% to 93% and a begins with a systematic standardized survey nal lumen.
specificity between 94% and 100% [1, 2]. using a curvilinear 3.55-MHz transducer. In
Reported sensitivity rates for evaluating in- patients with localized abdominal pain, how-
flammatory bowel disease range between ever, it may be helpful and timesaving to let Normal Sonographic Bowel Wall
67% and 96%, with specificities of 7997% patients indicate the position of maximum Anatomy
[3, 4]. Equal diagnostic accuracy of 84% was pain with their fingers on the abdominal wall The typical sonographic appearance of the
found for CT and for sonography in the and begin the examination there. In case of normal bowel wall consists of five concen-
workup of diverticulitis, with sensitivities of diffuse abdominal pain, the frame of the co- tric, alternately echogenic and hypoechoic
91% and 85%, respectively, and specificities of lon is identified by its strong gas artifacts and layers that we describe from the lumen out-
84% and 77%, respectively [5]. Although the is screened from the cecum to the sigmoid ward (Fig. 1). First, a small echogenic layer
sonographic appearance of bowel wall thick- colon. The rest of the abdomen is examined is seen that reflects the superficial mucosal
ening of different diseases sometimes over- in an individual standardized fashion to interface. The deep mucosa, including the
laps, careful examination of the thickened assure complete coverage of the entire muscularis mucosa, is seen as a second hyper-
Received January 27, 1999; accepted after revision June 7, 1999.
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. Address correspondence to H. P. Ledermann.
Gastroenterologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Parcusstr. 8, 55116 Mainz, Germany.
Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitt Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstr. 15, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland.
AJR 2000;174:107117 0361803X/00/1741107 American Roentgen Ray Society

AJR:174, January 2000 107

Ledermann et al.

echoic layer. A third hyperechoic layer is Inflammatory Bowel Disease ers, which results in a thick hypoechoic rim on
produced by the submucosa and the muscu- The classic sonographic feature of Crohns axial images. Strictures are shown as marked
laris propria interface. The muscularis pro- disease is the target sign (Fig. 2) on trans- thickening of the gut wall with a fixed hyper-
pria is seen as a fourth hypoechoic layer. verse images, which means a strong echogenic echoic narrowed lumen (Fig. 3A), dilatation,
Finally, the marginal interface to the serosa is center surrounded by a relatively sonolucent and hyperperistalsis of the proximal gut. Peri-
seen as the fifth small hyperechoic layer. The rim of more than 5 mm. This transmural in- intestinal inflammation leads to the creeping
average thickness of the normal gut wall is flammation or fibrosis can lead to complete fat sign, which appears as a uniform hyper-
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

24 mm [6]. circumferential loss of the typical gut wall lay- echoic mass typically seen around the ileum
and cecum. Mesenteric lymphadenopathy is
Fig. 1.4-year-old girl with gastroenteritis. Sagittal seen as multiple oval hypoechoic masses, usu-
sonogram shows normal gut wall layering of rectum ally in the right lower quadrant. In contrast to
(RE) from lumen outward. Note small echogenic layer
in lumen that reflects superficial mucosal interface
other forms of colitis, Crohns disease is sug-
(short thin arrow ). Deep mucosa, including muscu- gested by skip areas and involvement of the
laris mucosa, is seen as second hypoechoic layer distal ileum [7]. Possible complications of
(long thin arrow ). Third broad hyperechoic layer is Crohns disease comprise fistulas, abscess for-
produced by submucosa and muscularis propria inter-
face (open arrow ). Muscularis propria is seen as mation, mechanical bowel obstruction, and
fourth hypoechoic layer (short thick arrow ). Marginal perforation [8]. Abscesses are seen as poorly
interface to serosa is seen as small fifth hyperechoic defined, mostly hypoechoic focal masses that
layer (curved arrow ). ASC = ascites in retrovesical
space, B = bladder. can contain hyperechoic gas (Fig. 3B). Fistulas
are a hallmark of Crohns disease and are seen
in as many as one third of patients with ad-
vanced disease as hypoechoic tracts with gas
inclusions connecting bowel loops or adjacent


Fig. 2.25-year-old woman with Crohns disease who presented with new onset of crampy abdominal pain.
A, Transverse sonogram shows concentric echolucent wall thickening producing typical target sign.
B, Close-up longitudinal sonogram of same segment as A shows circular hypoechoic wall thickening and loss of
stratification that, together with clinical information, led to diagnosis of Crohns disease.
C, Small-bowel contrast-enhanced enema shows segmental bowel wall edema (arrow ) with thumbprinting and
narrowing of jejunal lumen in left lower abdomen. Diagnosis of Crohns disease was later clinically confirmed.

108 AJR:174, January 2000

Sonography of Bowel Wall
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Fig. 3.Complications of Crohns disease.
A, Stricture with obstruction in 52-year-old man. Transverse sonogram of ileum (arrows) shows severe narrowing of small hyperechoic central lumen caused by exces-
sively echolucent wall thickening and loss of stratification, indicating scarring of entire bowel wall.
B, Hypoechoic ileal abscess (A) in highly hypertrophic and inflamed hyperechoic fat of mesentery of 25-year-old woman.
C, Sonogram obtained at time of suspected relapse of 31-year-old woman shows hypoechoic fistula with small hyperechoic gas inclusion (arrow ).

structures (bladder, abdominal wall, vagina, assessment of the extent of the inflammatory lution equipment using 510-MHz broadband
psoas muscle) (Fig. 3C). Detection of gas bub- lesion is requested [3]. linear transducers. In ulcerative colitis, sensitiv-
bles in abnormal locations raises the possibil- Determination of disease activity by sonog- ity reaches 89% and specificity reaches 100%
ity of fistulous communication. raphy is controversial. Whereas some investiga- [11]. Differentiation between Crohns disease
In expert hands, the distribution of frank tors showed correlation with disease activity [4, and ulcerative colitis based on sonographic find-
lesions of inflammatory bowel disease can 10, 11], others found only a loose correlation ings includes the location of the disease, the
be determined with a sensitivity of 7387% between bowel wall thickening and disease ac- presence of skip lesions, and the presence of
on sonography [3, 9, 10]. However, mild le- tivity [9]. The ranges of reported sensitivities pericolic abscesses [14]. Bowel wall thickening
sions that produce less bowel wall thicken- and specificities in the diagnosis of Crohns dis- is usually less marked in ulcerative colitis with
ing are frequently not diagnosed, and the ease are 6796% and 7997%, respectively [4, preserved stratification [15] (Fig. 4). However,
sensitivity for these lesions drops to 52% 1214]. The relatively wide range in the values definite differential diagnosis is difficult on
[3]. These results indicate that sonography of sensitivity and specificity may be explained transabdominal sonography [4, 16].
cannot replace a contrast-enhanced exami- by the use of low-frequency transducers (3.5
nation or endoscopy when highly accurate MHz) in older studies and the use of high-reso-
Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma of the
Gastrointestinal Tract
The gut is the most commonly involved ex-
tranodal site of lymphoma [17]. The most
common sites, in order of descending fre-
quency, are stomach, small intestine, and co-
lon, especially cecum [17]. Eighty percent of
gastrointestinal lymphomas are of B-cell ori-
gin. In patients with underlying celiac disease,
however, T-lymphocyte origin predominates.
Sonography classically shows transmural cir-
cumferential, profoundly hypoechoic wall
thickening up to 4 cm in diameter [18], with
loss of normal stratification (Fig. 5A). This
pattern, also known as the pseudokidney
sign in longitudinal views, is observed in 70%
of patients [19] (Fig. 5B). The pseudokidney
sign is often seen in lymphoma because of ex-
Fig. 4.26-year-old man with ulcerative colitis and new onset of bloody diarrhea. tensive hypoechoic bowel wall thickening, but
A, Sagittal sonogram of descending colon reveals only subtle thickening of bowel wall (4.2-mm-thick submucosa it can be seen in any bowel disorder leading to
between crosses) with preserved stratification and normal echo texture of adjacent mesenteric fat.
B, Large-bowel enema with fine granularity of mucosa reflecting hyperemia and edema confirms suspected marked bowel wall thickening [20, 21]. Other
sonographic diagnosis of early changes in ulcerative colitis. findings include nodular or bulky tumor spread

AJR:174, January 2000 109

Ledermann et al.

and 10 mm with hypoechoic swollen ileal

folds in the edematous mucosa [24, 25]. Hypo-
echoic enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes rang-
ing from 7 to 21 mm in diameter were found in
most patients. Color Doppler sonography in
patients with infectious ileitis shows increased
flow centrally rather than peripherally (as in
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

appendicitis) [26].
Tuberculous enteritis and Behets syn-
drome also predominantly affect the ileoce-
cal region [27]. In a series of 45 patients
suffering from ileocecal tuberculosis, sonog-
raphy showed segmental predominantly con-
A B centric thickening of the terminal part of the
ileum and cecum in 43 patients [13], with en-
largement of the regional mesenteric lymph
nodes in 50% of these patients.

The typical finding of acute appendicitis in
transverse sonograms is the target sign with a
hypoechoic center, an inner hyperechoic ring,
and an external thicker hypoechoic ring (Fig.
6A). In sagittal images, the inflamed appendix
is seen as a blind-ending noncompressible tu-
bular structure (Fig. 6B). Focal or circumferen-
C D tial loss of the inner layer of echoes usually
indicates gangrenous inflammation and ulcer-
Fig. 5.Four typical sonographic variants of non-Hodgkins lymphoma. ation of the submucosa. Several studies
A, Most common circular involvement of entire wall with preserved peristalsis in 45-year-old man with unchar- achieved sensitivities of 8093% and specifici-
acteristic abdominal pain. Transverse sonogram reveals profound hypoechoic wall thickening.
B, Pseudokidney sign in ileocecal region: marked hypoechoic thickening of bowel wall resembling form of kid- ties of 94100% in the sonographic workup of
ney in longitudinal sonogram of cecum. Patient is 57-year-old woman. acute appendicitis [1, 2]. On the other hand, CT
C, Bulky disease in cecum in 63-year-old woman. Axial sonogram reveals large eccentric hypoechoic mass with has shown sensitivities of 90100% with speci-
compression of hyperechoic lumen.
D, Isolated mucosal involvement in 43-year-old man. Transverse sonogram of ileum with marked hyperechoic gy-
ficities of 8398% [2830]. In one study with a
ral thickening of mucosa and preserved layering of bowel wall. low (76%) sensitivity for sonography, CT was
found to be more accurate than sonography in
the diagnosis of acute appendicitis [28].
caused by extraluminal involvement [18] (Fig. bowel [23]. The most commonly involved Graded compression sonography gained wide-
5C). Mesenteric tumor spread and bulky tumor nodal groups in non-Hodgkins lymphoma of spread acceptance as a useful technique to
growth need biopsy for definite diagnosis be- the gastrointestinal tract are the celiac, retro- examine patients with atypical signs of appen-
cause they cannot be reliably differentiated crural, perirenal, perisplenic, perihepatic, and dicitis [31]. In a prospective study, the pro-
from other diseases such as primary bowel tu- mesenteric nodes [22]. posed treatment after clinical examination
mors or metastases. Isolated mucosal in- changed in 26% of all patients after sono-
volvement is rare and leads to hyperechoic graphic examination [2]. The diagnosis can be
thickening of the mucosa (Fig. 5D). Sono- Acute Terminal Ileitis established with confidence if the appendix is
graphic patterns favoring the diagnosis of a The clinical symptoms of acute ileitis are noncompressible, shows no peristalsis, and
non-Hodgkins lymphoma over adenocarci- right-sided lower abdominal pain, diarrhea, measures more than 6 mm in diameter [32] on
noma are transmural circumferential, pro- and nausea, with an accelerated erythrocyte axial images, and if compression leads to a lo-
foundly hypoechoic wall thickening with sedimentation rate, positive C-reactive protein, calized pain response. The surrounding mesen-
preserved peristalsis; lack of intestinal obstruc- and leukocytosis. Only careful evaluation in tery is often inflamed, which can be seen as a
tion, because narrowing of the lumen is un- the preoperative workup for suspected appen- hyperechoic diffuse halo sign around the ap-
common; involvement of a long stretch of the dicitis can prevent an unnecessary operation pendix (Fig. 6A). If an appendicolith is identi-
gut; and the presence of multiple prominent [24]. Acute ileitis is caused by Yersinia species fied in an appendix of any size, the findings of
regional lymph nodes [22]. Typical complica- but Campylobacter and Salmonella species the examination are always considered positive
tions are mucosal ulceration leading in 10 may also be cultured. Reported sonographic [33] (Fig. 6C). A simple additional color Dop-
50% of patients to bleeding, perforation of the features include hypoechogenic mural thicken- pler examination may be helpful in the diagno-
small intestine, and intussusception of the ing of the terminal ileum and cecum between 6 sis of early acute appendicitis [34]. The

110 AJR:174, January 2000

Sonography of Bowel Wall

Fig. 6.Sonographic findings in acute appendicitis.

A, Target sign (curved arrows) in acute appendicitis
in 12-year-old girl. On transverse image, inflamed ap-
pendix is seen with hypoechoic center, inner hyper-
echoic ring, and outer hypoechoic ring. Note
hyperechoic circular area (straight arrows) of in-
flamed mesentery (halo sign).
B, Longitudinal sonogram of inflamed appendix in
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

same patient shows blind-ending tubular structure

(arrow ) of at least 6 mm in diameter.
C, Multiple appendicoliths in 6-year-old girl. Longitudi-
nal section of inflamed appendix reveals five round
hyperechoic appendicoliths with acoustic shadows.
D, Perforating appendicitis in 6-year-old girl. Longitu-
dinal sonogram of inflamed appendix shows typical
blind-ending tubular structure and hypoechoic collec-
tion around tip, indicative of perforation.


presence of visible hyperemia or increased ficult to diagnose on sonography. Because CT amyloid is frequently seen [41]. Marked hypo-
flow in the hypoechoic muscular layer of the has been shown to be more accurate in staging echoic thickening of the affected bowel seg-
bowel wall may be a marker of appendicitis, periappendiceal inflammation and abscesses ments is found [42, 43].
whereas increased flow in the mucosal layer [5, 28, 36], CT may be preferred in patients Eosinophilic enteritis is a rare disease charac-
most likely represents enteritis [26]. Increased with suspected perforation or abscess; CT reli- terized by infiltration of the stomach or bowel
flow in the fat surrounding the appendix is in- ably differentiates phlegmon from abscess and wall with eosinophilic leukocytes. In three re-
dicative of transmural extension of the inflam- serves as an accurate road map for potential ported cases, hypoechoic thickening of multiple
mation with mesenteric response. An inflamed abscess drainage. ileal loops, narrowing of the lumen, and loss of
appendix rarely measures more than 15 mm in layer structure were described [44, 45].
transverse diameter [33], which usually allows Small-Bowel Diseases
differentiation from ileitis. A markedly en- Mesenteric infarction in its late stages
larged or perforating appendix or dilated fallo- leads to small-bowel wall thickening [37, 38].
pian tubes may lead to interpretive pitfalls [33]. In the early stages, however, no bowel wall
Perforation occurs in 2030% of young pa- thickening may be seen. Doppler sonography
tients with appendicitis (Fig. 6D). A statisti- can aid in differentiating ischemic and in-
cally significant association exists between flammatory bowel wall thickening. In ap-
perforation and two sonographic findings: loc- proximately 90% of cases, small-bowel
ulated pericecal fluid and loss of the echogenic infarctions are due to arterial hypoperfusion;
submucosa [35]. Abscess formation is the ma- only 10% are caused by mesenteric vein oc-
jor complication of perforating appendicitis. clusion. Acute intramural intestinal he-
Abscesses may extend into the pelvis or into matoma leads typically to a homogeneous
the peritoneal spaces of the upper abdomen. hypoechoic symmetric thickening of a long
They may be sonolucent or appear as a com- stretch of the affected bowel segment, with
plex mass. Advantages of sonography are wide reduced or absent peristalsis and marked lu-
availability, lack of radiation, and lack of con- minal narrowing [39] (Fig. 7). In the subacute Fig. 7.72-year-old woman with intramural hematoma
trast administration. Limitations of sonogra- stage, strong internal echoes caused by due to anticoagulant drug therapy. Patient was sent for
phy occur in obese and extremely meteoristic sonography to rule out atypical appendicitis. Trans-
thrombi may mimic an abscess [40]. verse sonogram of small-bowel segment discloses cir-
patients and in patients with severe pain due to Amyloidosis is a rare condition; however, cumferential hypoechoic thickening of bowel wall with
peritonitis. Retrocecal appendicitis may be dif- gastrointestinal involvement in patients with loss of stratification and compression of lumen.

AJR:174, January 2000 111

Ledermann et al.
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Fig. 8.50-year-old man with Whipples disease (intestinal lipodystrophy) presenting with steatorrhea.
A, Longitudinal sonogram depicts marked hyperechoic jejunal fold thickening.
B, Transverse sonogram shows jejunal thickening and hyperechoic lobulated lymph node (arrow ).
C, CT scan shows prominent jejunal folds and enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes. (Courtesy of Disler M, Kantonsspital Liestal, Switzerland)

The sonographic features of primary lym- may lead to irregular wall thickening with the the distal ileum (Fig. 9). All small-bowel carci-
phangiectasia have been described in four pa- typical contraction of several bowel loops to a noids are considered malignant because they
tients [46, 47]. Diffuse hypoechoic small-bowel conglomerate. Most frequent primary tumors eventually grow, invade, and metastasize. Me-
wall thickening, ascites, mesenteric edema, and originate from the ovary, stomach, colon, pan- tastases will occur in 10% of lesions smaller
thickened walls of the gallbladder and urinary creas, gallbladder, lung, and uterus. Primary than 1 cm and 95% of lesions larger than 2 cm
bladder are found. small-bowel tumors constitute only 36% of [53]. Only 4% of patients present with the typi-
One case report describes the sonographic gastrointestinal neoplasms. Abdominal symp- cal carcinoid syndrome [54]. In a series of six
findings of nontropical sprue (celiac disease) toms are usually vague and poorly defined, and patients, small bowel carcinoids presented as
as diffuse hypoechoic thickening of the entire conventional radiography of the upper and hypoechoic, homogeneous predominantly
small-bowel wall that disappears completely lower intestinal tract often has normal results. intraluminal masses with smooth intralumi-
after 3 months of a gluten-free diet [48]. These factors may lead to a delayed diagnosis. nal contour [54]. The tumors were attached to
Sonographic findings in a patient with Carcinoid tumor is the most frequent small- the wall by a broad base, with interruption of
Whipples disease (intestinal lipodystrophy) bowel tumor [52] and occurs in 80% of cases in the submucosa and thickening of the muscularis
disclosed hyperechoic concentric thickening
of the small bowel with enlarged hyper-
echoic lymph nodes [49]. The hyperechoic
structure of the intestinal wall and the en-
larged lymph nodes are explained by fat ac-
cumulation in these structures [50] (Fig. 8).
Markedly thickened hypoechoic bowel loops,
preferentially in the distal ileum, were found in
intestinal anisakiasis, a parasitic disease of the
gastrointestinal tract caused by ingestion of
Anisakis larvae in raw or undercooked fish [51].
Hypoechoic small-bowel wall thickening
reaching 11 mm and revealing a pseudokid-
ney appearance was found in a patient suffer-
ing from intestinal Behets disease [21].
Cytomegalovirus enteritis in AIDS patients
leads to wall thickening of the small and
large bowels with preserved stratification. A B
Fig. 9.57-year-old man with ileal carcinoid tumor presenting with mechanical small-bowel obstruction.
Tumors of the Small Intestine Other A, Transverse sonogram of terminal ileum reveals hypoechoic, homogeneous intraluminal mass with smooth in-
Than Lymphomas traluminal contour and broad-based hypoechoic infiltration of submucosa posteriorly. Note fluid-distended
small-bowel segments ventral to tumor, indicating mechanical obstruction.
Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the most fre- B, CT scan reveals strongly enhancing mass (arrow ) in terminal ileum, with infiltration of mesenteric fat dorsally
quent malignant lesion of the small bowel and and mechanical obstruction of small bowel.

112 AJR:174, January 2000

Sonography of Bowel Wall

propria in all cases. Carcinoid tumors of the ap- Colitis 10B), intramural or pericolic abscess (Fig.
pendix were described in two cases [55] as hy- The sonographic features of pseudomembra- 10C), and (usually) severe local tenderness in-
poechoic, well-delineated elongated masses in nous colitis have been described in a number of duced by graded compression. Diverticula are
the distal lumen and the tip of the appendix. reports [61, 62]. Striking thickening of the co- round or oval echogenic foci seen in or right
Lipomas are the second most common tumors lonic wall with a wide inner circle of heteroge- next to the gut wall, mostly with internal
of the small intestine and occur with greatest fre- neous medium echogenicity surrounded by a acoustic shadowing. Thickening of the bowel
quency in the distal ileum and at the ileocecal wall is usually considered present when the
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

narrow hypoechoic muscularis propria is found

valve. The location of these tumors is submu- in all patients, reflecting the gross submucosal distance from the echogenic lumen interface to
cosal, or, less frequently, is subserosal. In three edema. The lumen of the colon is almost com- the hyperechogenic serosa and pericolic fat ex-
fourths of cases, the tumors are clinically silent pletely effaced by the mural edema, and 64 ceeds 4 mm [5]. Inflammatory changes in the
[56]. If the lipoma becomes larger than 4 cm, 77% of the patients have ascites [61, 62]. The pericolic fat are seen as ill-defined echogenic
chronic hemorrhage caused by ulceration of the presence of these sonographic features in a pa- areas surrounding the thickened colon seg-
mucosa or intestinal obstruction resulting from in- tient with watery diarrhea and a history of anti- ment. Pericolic abscesses typically present as
tussusception may cause symptoms [57, 58]. Typ- biotic therapy strongly suggests the diagnosis hypoechoic masses adjacent to the inflamed
ical sonographic features are a well-circumscribed of pseudomembranous colitis. Pseudomembra- bowel. The major sonographic finding in pa-
hyperechoic round or oval mass with deformation nous colitis shows typically a strong folding or tients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis
under compression. Leiomyomas and schwanno- gyral pattern of the swollen submucosa. of the right colon has been found to be a hypo-
mas are seen as hypoechoic intramural round Ischemic colitis cannot be differentiated echoic round or oval focus protruding from the
structures with smooth boundaries [52, 58, 59]. solely by sonography from inflammation or any segmentally thickened colonic wall and repre-
Ulceration of the mucosa may cause gastrointesti- other form of colonic wall thickening. However, senting small abscesses in the pericolic fat
nal hemorrhage of varying severity. Leiomyosar- duplex and color Doppler sonography may be [68]. The sensitivity of sonography in the diag-
comas were described as large irregular masses helpful in differentiating between ischemic and nosis of acute colonic diverticulitis ranges in
with a heterogeneous echo pattern [58]. Adeno- inflammatory bowel wall thickening [63]. Ab- the literature from 84% to 100% [5, 6971]. In
carcinoma is the second most common small in- sence of or barely visible color Doppler flow a recent study comparing sonography and CT
testine malignancy and the peak incidence is in and absence of arterial signal suggest ischemia. in the evaluation of acute colonic diverticulitis,
the seventh decade of life [52]. A series of four On the other hand, readily visible color Doppler both techniques reached a similar sensitivity
cases with duodenal adenocarcinomas showed flow and a stratified echo texture suggest in- (85% and 91%, respectively) and specificity
moderately large intraluminal masses with me- flammation. Various case reports have described (84% and 77%, respectively) [5]. False-nega-
dium echogenicity [58]. The authors report im- colonic wall thickening in different forms of in- tive results may occur if inflammatory bowel
proved sonographic detection of small-bowel fectious and noninfectious colitis [24, 6467]. wall thickening is only mild [3]. False-positive
tumors by intermittent observation of the small- results are reported in adenocarcinoma, lym-
bowel lesions during the first hour after water phoma, Crohns disease, ischemic colitis, and
ingestion. Transabdominal sonography reached Diverticulitis extracolic inflammatory conditions adjacent to
excellent sensitivity in detecting small-bowel Sonographic features of diverticulitis in- the colonic wall [69, 71]. False-positive results
tumors in unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding clude visualization of diverticula (Fig. 10A), may be reduced with Doppler sonography
[59] and in small-bowel obstruction [60]. In thickening of the bowel wall, inflammatory [63]. Potential pitfalls in diagnosing pericolic
most cases, the tumors were seen as round and changes in the pericolic fat (typically on the abscesses are collections smaller than 2.5 cm
smoothly delineated hypoechoic masses. mesenteric side of the colonic wall) (Fig. in diameter [5], interloop abscesses, and ab-

Fig. 10.Sonographic features of diverticulitis.
A, Diverticulum of sigmoid colon in 63-year-old man is seen as focal hyperechoic intramural structure with acoustic shadow.
B, Massive hyperechoic inflammatory infiltration in 76-year-old woman is seen on mesenteric side of sigmoid colon.
C, Echolucent fistula in 67-year-old woman is seen in mesentery with small, hyperechoic, gas-containing abscess (arrow ).

AJR:174, January 2000 113

Ledermann et al.

scesses with gas inclusions [69]. CT is more colonic obstruction. Rectum carcinomas are inal sonography is not an effective screening
accurate than sonography in revealing ab- seen only when the bladder is well-filled (Figs. technique in the diagnosis of colonic cancer.
scesses [5, 28, 36] and is helpful in planning 11B and 11C). Sonography enables localiza-
percutaneous drainage by exactly delineating tion of large-bowel obstruction in 85% of Intussusception
the bowel loops [5]. patients and diagnosis of the cause of large- Only 510% of all intussusceptions occur in
bowel obstruction in 81% of patients [76]. adults [78, 79]. The clinical symptoms may sug-
Colonic Carcinoma Shirahama et al. [77] described four sono- gest partial obstruction of the intestine, but diag-
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Abdominal sonography may be the first im- graphic patterns that allowed correct diagnosis nosis may be difficult because symptoms are
aging method that patients with colonic cancer of colonic carcinoma in 90% of patients: local- often nonspecific [79]. The ileocecal region is
undergo when they present with nonspecific ized irregular thickening of the colonic wall the most commonly affected area in children,
gastrointestinal symptoms. Careful sono- with heterogeneous low echogenicity; irregu- whereas there is no clearly preferred anatomic
graphic evaluation of the bowel may disclose a lar contour; lack of movement or change in site in adults. Most intussusceptions in children
focal mass or mural thickening. Sonographic configuration on real-time scanning; and ab- are idiopathic and are presumed to be the result
diagnosis of colonic carcinoma has been de- sence of a layered appearance of the colonic of enlarged lymphoid follicles in the terminal il-
scribed by several authors [7274]. Colonic wall. Other findings include lymphadenopathy eum. An organic cause can be shown in as many
carcinomas have two typical sonographic ap- in most patients and abscess formation in 10% as 90% of cases in adults [78, 79]. The leading
pearances [75]. The first type is seen as a local- of patients. In a recent publication, malignant mass is nearly always a tumor of the intestinal
ized hypoechoic mass up to 10 cm or more conditions of the colon showed the following wall, usually malignant in intussusceptions of
with an irregular shape and a lobulated con- characteristics: loss of stratification, absence of the colon [80] and benign in intussusceptions of
tour. The intraluminal gas, seen as a cluster of perigut findings, and involvement of a short the small intestine [57, 78]. The sonographic
high amplitude, is usually eccentrically located bowel segment with significantly greater wall hallmark of intussusception has been described
around the mass (Fig. 11A). The second type thickness than is present in benign processes as the target [81], doughnut, or bulls-eye
shows segmental eccentric or circumferential [62]. However, negative findings on sono- sign [82]. Typically, one finds two hypoechoic
thickening of the colonic wall. The mural graphic examinations do not rule out the diag- rings separated by a hyperechoic ring or crescent
thickening may be irregular but not as severe nosis of colonic carcinoma because small on axial images (Fig. 12). On longitudinal im-
as in the first type (Fig. 11B). The central echo masses and overlying bowel gas can lead to ages, a pseudokidney structure or layering of hy-
clusters are small because the diseased lumen false-negative results [72, 76]. Because of poechoic lines with hyperechoic areas is
is usually narrow. This type leads frequently to these limitations, mainly in sensitivity, abdom- observed. The outer hypoechoic ring is formed


Fig. 11.Sonographic features of colonic carcinoma.

A, Eccentric type in 52-year-old man. Transverse sonogram shows typical irregular eccentric thickening of cecum
wall and loss of stratification. Note eccentrically located intraluminal air (arrow ).
B, Circumferential type in 66-year-old man. Longitudinal sonogram of sigmoid colon with irregular circumferential
thickening (arrows) of short colonic wall segment.
C, Polypoid rectal carcinoma in 59-year-old man. Transvesical transverse sonogram of rectum shows endoluminal
round polypoid tumor measuring 3 cm in diameter (between crosses).
D, CT correlation of lesion in C.

114 AJR:174, January 2000

Sonography of Bowel Wall

13. Lim JH, Ko YT, Lee DH, Lim JW, Kim TH.
Sonography of inflammatory bowel disease: find-
ings and value in differential diagnosis. AJR
14. Worlicek H, Lutz H, Heyder N, Matek W. Ultra-
sound findings in Crohns disease and ulcerative
colitis: a prospective study. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

15. Bozkurt T, Richter F, Lux G. Ultrasonography as a

primary diagnostic tool in patients with inflamma-
tory disease and tumors of the small intestine and
large bowel. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:8591
16. Hata J, Haruma K, Yamanaka H, et al. Ultrasono-
graphic evaluation of the bowel wall in inflamma-
tory bowel disease: comparison of in vivo and in
vitro studies. Abdom Imaging 1994;19:395399
17. Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Pantongrag-Brown L,
A B Buck JL, Herlinger H. Non-Hodgkins lymphoma
of the gastrointestinal tract: radiographic findings.
Fig. 12.57-year-old man with intussusception of anastomosed jejunum into remaining stomach after a Billroth
II procedure (subtotal gastrectomy). AJR 1997;168:165172
A, Transverse sonogram shows hypoechoic kidney-shaped mass reflecting remnant of stomach with intussus- 18. Goerg C, Schwerk WB, Goerg K. Gastrointestinal
ception in its lumen. Small hyperechoic ring formed by invaginated mesentery divides intussuscipiens (gastroje- lymphoma: sonographic findings in 54 patients.
junal anastomosis) on outside from intussusceptum (jejunum) and leads to a ring-in-ring structure. AJR 1990;155:795798
B, CT correlation confirms intussusception. 19. Sener RN, Alper H, Demirci A, Diren HB. A differ-
ent sonographic pseudokidney appearance
diology 1987;163:1114 detected with intestinal lymphoma: hydronephrotic-
by the intussuscipiens and the everted returning 2. Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, et al. A pro- pseudokidney. J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17:209212
limb of the intussusceptum, with their mucosal spective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis 20. Dorak AC, Alp E, Deviren MU. Hydronephrotic
surfaces face to face [83]. The center of the intus- of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 1987;317:666669 pseudokidney sign: is it specific for intestinal
susception varies with the scan level. At the 3. Pradel JA, David XR, Taourel P, Djafari M, Vey- lymphoma? J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:561563
apex, the center is hypoechoic because of the en- rac M, Bruel JM. Sonographic assessment of the 21. Akhan O, Haliloglu M, Ozmen M. Diagnosis of
tering limb of the intussusceptum. At the base, normal and abnormal bowel wall in nondiverticu- enterobehcets disease from a pseudo-kidney ap-
lar ileitis and colitis. Abdom Imaging 1997;2: pearance in ultrasonography (letter). J Clin Ultra-
the entering bowel wall forms a hypoechoic cen-
167172 sound 1991;19:451452
ter that is surrounded by the hyperechoic mesen- 4. Hata J, Haruma K, Suenaga K, et al. Ultrasono- 22. Smith C, Kubicka RA, Thomas CR Jr. Non-
tery [83]. In a case of surgically proven triple graphic assessment of inflammatory bowel dis- Hodgkin lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract.
jejunojejunocolonic intussusception [84], three ease. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:443447 RadioGraphics 1992;12:887899
hypoechoic rings separated by two hyperechoic 5. Pradel JA, Adell JF, Taourel P, Djafari M, Monnin 23. Rubesin SE, Gilchrist AM, Bronner M, et al.
rings were found on sonography. DE, Bruel JM. Acute colonic diverticulitis: pro- Non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the small intestine.
spective comparative evaluation with US and CT. RadioGraphics 1990;10:985998
Radiology 1997;205:503512 24. Puylaert JB, Van der Zant FM, Mutsaers JA. In-
6. Fleischer AC, Muhletaler CA, James AE Jr. Sono- fectious ileocecitis caused by Yersinia, Campylo-
Conclusion graphic assessment of the bowel wall. AJR 1981; bacter, and Salmonella: clinical, radiological and
Sonography of the gastrointestinal tract 136:887891 US findings. Eur Radiol 1997;7:39
should be included in abdominal sonography 7. DiCandio G, Mosca F, Campatelli A, Bianchini 25. Puylaert JB. Mesenteric adenitis and acute termi-
of patients presenting with abdominal pain of M, DElia F, Dellagiovampaola C. Sonographic nal ileitis: US evaluation using graded compres-
unknown origin to look for potential bowel detection of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn dis- sion. Radiology 1986;161:691695
ease. AJR 1986;146:523526 26. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ. Appendicitis in children: color
disorders. Careful analysis of the sonographic 8. Sarrazin J, Wilson SR. Manifestations of Crohn Doppler sonography. Radiology 1992;184:745747
changes of a thickened bowel segment in con- disease at US. RadioGraphics 1996;16:499520 27. Lee DH, Ko YT, Yoon Y, Lim JH. Sonographic
text with the clinical information often leads to 9. Maconi G, Parente F, Bollani S, Cesana B, Bian- findings of intestinal tuberculosis. J Ultrasound
a limited differential diagnosis or even to the chi PG. Abdominal ultrasound in the assessment Med 1993;12:537540
correct diagnosis. If a bowel disorder is de- of extent and activity of Crohns disease: clinical 28. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ,
tected, targeted use of barium enemas, CT, en- significance and implication of bowel wall thick- Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and
ening. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:16041609 US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994;
doscopy, or biopsy can be performed if
10. Brignola C, Belloli C, Iannone P, et al. Compari- 190:3135
additional workup is needed. son of scintigraphy with indium-111 leukocyte 29. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA,
More large-scale studies are needed to scan and ultrasonography in assessment of X-ray- McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the
compare the use of sonography with other demonstrated lesions of Crohns disease. Dig Dis appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospi-
methods for imaging the various diseases of Sci 1993;38:433437 tal resources. N Engl J Med 1998;338:141146
the gastrointestinal tract. 11. Arienti V, Campieri M, Boriani L, et al. Manage- 30. Balthazar EJ, Rofsky NM, Zucker R. Appendici-
ment of severe ulcerative colitis with the help of tis: the impact of computed tomography imaging
high resolution ultrasonography. Am J Gastroen- on negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
terol 1996;91:21632169 Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:768771
References 12. Sonnenberg A, Erckenbrecht J, Peter P, Niederau 31. Yacoe ME, Jeffrey RB Jr. Sonography of appen-
1. Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Lewis FR. Acute appen- C. Detection of Crohns disease by ultrasound. dicitis and diverticulitis. Radiol Clin North Am
dicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings. Ra- Gastroenterology 1982;83:430434 1994;32:899912

AJR:174, January 2000 115

Ledermann et al.

32. Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute ap- sponse to treatment. Clin Radiol 1997;52:244245 66. Mathis G, Metzler J. Sonography in Salmonella
pendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 49. Bruggemann A, Burchardt H, Lepsien G. Sono- enterocolitis. Ultraschall Med 1992;13:106109
cases. Radiology 1988;167:327329 graphical findings in Whipple's disease: a case re- 67. Hussain S, Dinshaw H. Ultrasonography in ame-
33. Jeffrey RB, Jain KA, Nghiem HV. Sonographic port with regard to the literature. Surg Endosc bic colitis. J Ultrasound Med 1990;9:385388
diagnosis of acute appendicitis: interpretive pit- 1992;6:138140 68. Wada M, Kikuchi Y, Doy M. Uncomplicated
falls. AJR 1994;162:5559 50. Carroccio A, Soresi M, Montalto G, et al. Whip- acute diverticulitis of the cecum and ascending
34. Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim TH, Namgung S, Lee SJ, ples disease: a non-invasive approach for suspected colon: sonographic findings in 18 patients. AJR
Lim JH. Appendicitis: usefulness of color Dop- diagnosiscase report. Ital J Gastroenterol 1996; 1990;155:283287
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

pler US. Radiology 1996;201:221225 28:229231 69. Wilson SR, Toi A. The value of sonography in the
35. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ, Coffin CM. Acute appendi- 51. Shirahama M, Koga T, Ishibashi H, Uchida S, diagnosis of acute diverticulitis of the colon. AJR
citis in children: value of sonography in detecting Ohta Y, Shimoda Y. Intestinal anisakiasis: US in 1990;154:11991202
perforation. AJR 1992;159:12651268 diagnosis. Radiology 1992;185:789793 70. Zielke A, Hasse C, Nies C, et al. Prospective eval-
36. Jasinski RW, Glazer GM, Francis IR, Harkness 52. Ashley SW, Wells SA. Tumors of the small intes- uation of ultrasonography in acute colonic diver-
RL. CT and ultrasound in abscess detection at tine. Semin Oncol 1988;15:116128 ticulitis. Br J Surg 1997;84:385388
specific anatomic sites: a study of 198 patients. 53. Moertel CG. Karnofsky memorial lecture: an od- 71. Schwerk WB, Schwarz S, Rothmund M. Sonog-
Comput Radiol 1987;11:4147 yssey in the land of small tumors. J Clin Oncol raphy in acute colonic diverticulitis: a prospective
37. Clautice ET, Jeffrey RB Jr, Li KC, Barth RA. 1987;5:15021522 study. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:10771084
Power Doppler imaging of focal lesions of the 54. Rioux M, Langis P, Naud F. Sonographic appear- 72. Schwerk W, Braun B, Dombrowski H. Real-time ul-
gastrointestinal tract: comparison with conven- ance of primary small bowel carcinoid tumor. Ab- trasound examination in the diagnosis of gastrointes-
tional color Doppler imaging. J Ultrasound Med dom Imaging 1995;20:3743 tinal tumors. J Clin Ultrasound 1979;7:425431
1996;15:6366 55. Rioux M, Duchesne N, Langis P. Carcinoid tumor 73. Bluth EI, Merritt CR, Sullivan MA. Ultrasonic
38. Siegel MJ, Friedland JA, Hildebolt CF. Bowel of the appendix: ultrasound findings in two cases. evaluation of the stomach, small bowel, and co-
wall thickening in children: differentiation with J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:129133 lon. Radiology 1979;133:677680
US. Radiology 1997;203:631635 56. Taylor AJ, Stewart ET, Dodds WJ. Gastrointesti- 74. Price J, Metreweli C. Ultrasonographic diagnosis
39. Lee TG, Brickman FE, Avecilla LS. Ultrasound nal lipomas: a radiologic and pathologic review. of clinically non-palpable primary colonic neo-
diagnosis of intramural intestinal hematoma. J AJR 1990;155:12051210 plasms. Br J Radiol 1988;61:190195
Clin Ultrasound 1977;5:423424 57. Urbano J, Serantes A, Hernandez L, Turegano F. 75. Lim JH. Colorectal cancer: sonographic findings.
40. Chau WK, Na AT, Loh IW, Chang CW, Wong Lipoma-induced jejunojejunal intussusception: AJR 1996;167:4547
KB. Real-time ultrasound diagnosis of intramural US and CT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 1996;21: 76. Lim JH, Ko YT, Lee DH, Lee HW, Lim JW. De-
intestinal hematoma. J Clin Ultrasound 1989;17: 522524 termining the site and causes of colonic obstruc-
382384 58. Bin W, Jianguo L, Baowei D. The sonographic tion with sonography. AJR 1994;163:11131117
41. Ectors N, Geboes K, Kerremans R, Desmet V, appearances of small bowel tumors. Clin Radiol 77. Shirahama M, Koga T, Ishibashi H, Uchida S,
Janssens J. Small bowel amyloidosis, pathology 1992;46:3033 Ohta Y. Sonographic features of colon carcinoma
and diagnosis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1992;55: 59. Bozkurt T, Butsch B, Schmiegelow P, Lux G. Ultra- seen with high-frequency transabdominal ultra-
228238 sound imaging of mesenchymal small intestine tu- sound. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:359365
42. Shirahama M, Morita S, Koga T, et al. Gas- mors in diagnosis of unexplained gastrointestinal 78. Weilbaecher D, Bolin JA, Hearn D, Ogden W. In-
trointestinal amyloidosis associated with multiple hemorrhage. Ultraschall Med 1993;14:264268 tussusception in adults: review of 160 cases. Am J
myeloma: sonographic features. J Clin Ultra- 60. Ko YT, Lim JH, Lee DH, Lee HW, Lim JW. Surg 1971;121:531535
sound 1991;19:493497 Small bowel obstruction: sonographic evaluation. 79. Prater JM, Olshemski FC. Adult intussusception.
43. Whitby EH, Peck RJ. Case report: ultrasound of Radiology 1993;188:649653 Am Fam Physician 1993;47:447452
primary generalised AL amyloid of the small 61. Downey DB, Wilson SR. Pseudomembranous coli- 80. Kojima Y, Tsuchiyama T, Niimoto S, Nakagawara
bowel. Clin Radiol 1996;51:447448 tis: sonographic features. Radiology 1991;180:6164 G. Adult intussusception caused by cecal cancer
44. Tuncali K, Erzen C, Gurmen N, Tuzuner N, Ulusoy 62. Truong M, Atri M, Bret PM, et al. Sonographic and diagnosed preoperatively by ultrasonography.
NB. Eosinophilic gastroenteropathy: ultrasono- appearance of benign and malignant conditions of J Clin Ultrasound 1992;20:360363
graphic features and the role of ultrasonography in the colon. AJR 1998;170:14511455 81. Weissberg DL, Scheible W, Leopold GR. Ultra-
follow-up. J Clin Ultrasound 1992;20:475478 63. Teefey SA, Roarke MC, Brink JA, et al. Bowel sonographic appearance of adult intussusception.
45. Seelen JL, You PH, de VA, Puylaert JB. Eosino- wall thickening: differentiation of inflammation Radiology 1977;124:791792
philic enteritis presenting as acute abdomen: US from ischemia with color Doppler and duplex US. 82. Holt S, Samuel E. Multiple concentric ring sign
features of two cases. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; Radiology 1996;198:547551 in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of intussuscep-
17:1920 64. Matsumoto T, Iida M, Matsui T, et al. Ultrasonic and tion. Gastrointest Radiol 1978;3:307309
46. Dorne HL, Jequier S. Sonography of intestinal lym- CT findings in penicillin-induced nonpseudomem- 83. Del Pozzo G, Albillos JC, Tejedor D. Intussuscep-
phangiectasia. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:1316 branous colitis. Gastrointest Radiol 1990;15:329332 tion: US findings with pathologic correlationthe
47. Maya MM, Friedwald J. Intestinal lymphan- 65. Suarez B, Kalifa G, Adamsbaum C, Saint MC, crescent-in-doughnut sign. Radiology 1996;199:
giectasia: ultrasound evaluation of a case simulat- Barbotin LF. Sonographic diagnosis and follow- 688692
ing appendicitis. Abdom Imaging 1993;18:2728 up of diffuse neutropenic colitis: case report of a 84. Rapaccini GL, Grattagliano A. Echographic diag-
48. Peck RJ, Jackson A, Gleeson D. Case report: ultra- child treated for osteogenic sarcoma. Pediatr Ra- nosis of bowel intussusception. Am J Gastroen-
sound of coeliac disease with demonstration of re- diol 1995;25:373374 terol 1993;88:21432144

116 AJR:174, January 2000

Sonography of Bowel Wall

APPENDIX 1: Differential Diagnosis of Small-Bowel Wall Thickening

Common: Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohns disease and backwash ileitis)
Acute ileitis (Yersinia, Campylobacter species)
Postoperative edema
Peritoneal carcinomatosis
Mesenteric infarction (arterial, venous)
Downloaded from by on 07/20/17 from IP address Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Extraintestinal inflammatory conditions adjacent to bowel wall

Less common: Intestinal hematoma
Cytomegalovirus enteritis in AIDS patients
Carcinoid and other malignant tumors
Benign tumors (lipoma, adenoma, and schwannoma)
Rare: Tuberculosis
Celiac disease
Whipples disease
Eosinophilic enteritis
Behets disease

APPENDIX 2: Differential Diagnosis of Colonic Wall Thickening

Common: Diverticulitis
Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohns disease and ulcerative colitis)
Postoperative edema
Peritoneal carcinomatosis
Less common: Extracolic inflammatory conditions adjacent to the colonic wall
Rare: Lymphoma

AJR:174, January 2000 117